Summary and Analysis of Federal CARES Act Eviction Moratorium
Summary and Analysis of Federal CARES Act Eviction Moratorium
Summary and Analysis of Federal CARES Act Eviction Moratorium
On March 27, 2020, the president signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
Act (“CARES Act”) into law. The law includes important, immediate protections for tenants and
homeowners. The federal eviction moratorium for tenants living in certain types of housing is
summarized below. NHLP is working on a separate analysis regarding the provisions for
homeowners.
The eviction moratorium restricts lessors of covered properties (discussed in more detail below)
from filing new eviction actions for non-payment of rent, and also prohibits “charg[ing] fees,
penalties, or other charges to the tenant related to such nonpayment of rent.” Sec. 4024(b). The
federal moratorium also provides that a lessor (of a covered property) may not evict a tenant after
the moratorium expires except on 30 days’ notice—which may not be given until after the
moratorium period. See Sec. 4024(c).
The moratorium does not explicitly state whether evictions “for nonpayment of rent or other fees
or charges” includes evictions motivated by a tenant’s nonpayment of rent (or other fees or
charges) but formally based on a “no-cause” lease termination notice or refusal to renew a term
tenancy. Sec. 4024(b)(1). However, advocates should assert that the moratorium bars the filing
of any eviction case that is motivated (wholly or in part) by a tenant’s nonpayment of rent or
other fees or charges, whether or not the action is formally based on such non-payment.
Allowing landlords to skirt the moratorium by evicting tenants for “no cause” would frustrate the
purpose of the statute where the reason for the eviction is delinquent rent or fees. And, such a
reading would lead to an absurd result, because a landlord could more quickly and easily evict a
tenant without cause during the moratorium period than after the moratorium expires (at which
point a 30-day notice would be required).
For cases that are not barred (or not clearly barred) by the federal moratorium, advocates should
next check to see whether any state or local eviction moratorium protects the client. Advocates
should also check to see if any state or local moratorium provides more expansive protections
than provided by the federal moratorium.
II. What types of housing are covered by the federal eviction moratorium?
The eviction moratorium applies to “covered dwellings,” which includes those dwellings on or in
“covered properties.” Sec. 4024(a). The Act defines a “covered property” as a property that: (1)
participates in a “covered housing program” as defined by the Violence Against Women Act
(VAWA) (as amended through the 2013 reauthorization); (2) participates in the “rural housing
voucher program under section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949”; (3) has a federally backed
mortgage loan; or (4) has a federally backed multifamily mortgage loan. See Sec. 4024(a)(2).
The eviction moratorium extends to federal housing rental programs covered by VAWA (34
U.S.C. § 12491(a)). The moratorium itself does not impact VAWA housing protections, but
referencing the VAWA statute was presumably a quick way to extend coverage to most federally
assisted rental housing programs. VAWA-covered housing programs include the following1:
2
• McKinney-Vento Act homelessness programs (42 U.S.C. § 11360, et seq.)5
Department of Agriculture
• Section 515 Rural Rental Housing (42 U.S.C. § 1485)
• Sections 514 and 516 Farm Labor Housing (42 U.S.C. §§ 1484, 1486)
• Section 533 Housing Preservation Grants (42 U.S.C. § 1490m)
• Section 538 multifamily rental housing (42 U.S.C. § 1490p-2)
Department of Treasury
• Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) (26 U.S.C. § 42)6
For programs that fund units (rather than tenant-based subsidies), advocates can use resources
such as the National Low-Income Housing Coalition’s searchable map and database of
affordable properties covered by federal eviction moratoriums to determine what type of housing
a client is living in.
The evictions moratorium also extends to “the rural housing voucher program under section 542
of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490r).” Sec. 4024(a)(2)(A)(ii). The separate inclusion
of this program was necessary because the Rural Housing Voucher Program was omitted from
the covered housing programs in the 2013 VAWA reauthorization statute.
Federally backed mortgage loans are defined to include loans secured by any lien on residential
properties having 1-4 units and that are “made in whole or in part, or insured, guaranteed,
supplemented, or assisted in any way, by any officer or agency of the Federal Government or
under or in connection with a housing or urban development program administered by [HUD] or
a housing or related program administered by any other such officer or agency, or is purchased
or securitized by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Federal National
Mortgage Association.” Sec. 4024(a)(4). Note that there is a differently worded definition of the
term "federally backed mortgage loan" in Sec. 4022(a)(2) of the Act where the term is defined in
terms of a finite list of federal agencies and loan programs7 in contrast to the more sweeping
5
Due to what is presumably a drafting error in the VAWA 2013 statute, the VAWA statutory text at 34 U.S.C. §
12491(a)(3)(D) does not refer to a specific program, as there is no program at “subtitle A of title IV of the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act.” However, HUD concluded in 2013 that “it was Congress’s intent to
include the programs found elsewhere in title IV, which include the Emergency Solutions Grants program, the
Continuum of Care program, and the Rural Housing Assistance Stability program.” The Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013: Overview of Applicability to HUD Programs, Notice, 78 Fed. Reg. 47,717, 47,719 n.4
(Aug. 6, 2013).
6
Note that the LIHTC (26 U.S.C. § 42) is distinct from the Historic Tax Credit (HTC) (26 U.S.C. § 47). The HTC,
on its own, is not covered by VAWA.
7
The definition in Sec. 4022(a)(2) -- which applies to the provisions in the Act regarding payment relief and a
foreclosure moratorium for homeowners -- includes all loans that are owned, insured or guaranteed by one of the
following entities: HUD (including Federal Housing Administration loans, reverse mortgages and certain loans
3
language here. It is not entirely clear if these two definitions of the same term are intended to
cover the same set of loans, but the definition of "federally backed mortgage loan" in the eviction
moratorium provisions is arguably much broader, so advocates should assert that a tenant is
protected by the moratorium even if the landlord's mortgage is not known to be a HUD, VA,
USDA or Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loan.
Landlords should know or have access to the information necessary to determine whether their
properties have federally backed mortgage loans. Such resources include the note or mortgage
instruments themselves, other closing documents, servicing notices, account statements, or other
correspondence, as well as loan look-up websites for both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Since
tenants will often not have access to that information, advocates should assert that a landlord
who files an eviction suit (for nonpayment of rent) during the federal moratorium period must
plead and prove that the property is not subject to a federally backed mortgage loan.
A federally backed multifamily mortgage loan has the same definition as “federally-backed
mortgage loan,” but is secured by a property with five or more dwelling units. See Sec.
4024(a)(5).
The federal eviction moratorium took effect on March 27, 2020 and extends for 120 days. See
Sec. 4024(b). Landlords that receive forbearances of federally backed multifamily mortgage
loans must respect identical renter protections for the duration of the forbearance. See Sec.
4023(d).
For more resources and any updates to this memo, please visit NHLP’s COVID-19 Resources
Webpage.
under programs for Native Americans and Native Hawaiians); the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department
of Agriculture and Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.