Edtech 270 Course Summary
Edtech 270 Course Summary
Edtech 270 Course Summary
when I entered the course. Clearly I designed educational experiences for my students, but
my designing process was haphazard at best. I definitely learned that throwing together a
learning module without a lot of forethought is not a good system. There are systems,
progressions, and logic involved. Using these design methods greatly simplifies the process
of instructional design.
SOURCE: http://www.noodlenook.net/addie-and-design/#sthash.6SIRDbRT.dpbs
One of the most helpful things that I learned, and will be applying in my future course
development immediately came from studying the ADDIE model of instructional design. It is
likely that I will never implement the ADDIE model in my instructional design due to time
pressure. Since I usually have a very limited time to create a new class, the ADDIE model is
not feasible. However, there is one aspect of ADDIE that I plan to utilize in all of my course
design work: build the course assessments first. In designing courses in the past, I have
always built the course content first and then built the assessments. This has often proved
problematic because the assessments that I want to use don’t flow easily from the course
content. This usually means that write an assessment and then use it in class. If parts of the
assessment didn’t work, I fix it for the next time I teach the class and try again. Using
students as assessment guinea pigs is probably not the best idea.
Building the assessments at the beginning and using them as a road map to designing the
course content seems a lot more efficient. For example, when I started teaching general
chemistry I spent a lot of time teaching my students why different classes of chemical
reactions work. That is definitely important information but my exams didn’t deal with why at
all. Instead the assessment had the students working out and analyzing chemistry reactions
which I spent much less time on. The course content should have been flowing from the
assessment whereas I had… chaos? Anyways, overtime I changed the instruction to fit
better with the assessment. It would have been nice if those early classes would have had
their instruction laid out from the assessment.
How I Teach
SOURCE: http://www.kristimillertime.com/2012/01/listography-2012.html
Conclusion
SOURCE: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/sat4.html
On the whole, this course has been an eye opening experience. I learned that there is a
science to instructional design. It is not this haphazard system that I have used in the past.
Instead there are supposed to be steps. Within each of those steps, new technology can be
added, new ideas explored. Overall I think that this course will dramatically change the way
I develop my courses in the future.