Edtech 270 Course Summary

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

As I am finishing this course I do not believe that I really understood instructional design

when I entered the course. Clearly I designed educational experiences for my students, but
my designing process was haphazard at best. I definitely learned that throwing together a
learning module without a lot of forethought is not a good system. There are systems,
progressions, and logic involved. Using these design methods greatly simplifies the process
of instructional design.

Build Assessments First

SOURCE: http://www.noodlenook.net/addie-and-design/#sthash.6SIRDbRT.dpbs

One of the most helpful things that I learned, and will be applying in my future course
development immediately came from studying the ADDIE model of instructional design. It is
likely that I will never implement the ADDIE model in my instructional design due to time
pressure. Since I usually have a very limited time to create a new class, the ADDIE model is
not feasible. However, there is one aspect of ADDIE that I plan to utilize in all of my course
design work: build the course assessments first. In designing courses in the past, I have
always built the course content first and then built the assessments. This has often proved
problematic because the assessments that I want to use don’t flow easily from the course
content. This usually means that write an assessment and then use it in class. If parts of the
assessment didn’t work, I fix it for the next time I teach the class and try again. Using
students as assessment guinea pigs is probably not the best idea.

Building the assessments at the beginning and using them as a road map to designing the
course content seems a lot more efficient. For example, when I started teaching general
chemistry I spent a lot of time teaching my students why different classes of chemical
reactions work. That is definitely important information but my exams didn’t deal with why at
all. Instead the assessment had the students working out and analyzing chemistry reactions
which I spent much less time on. The course content should have been flowing from the
assessment whereas I had… chaos? Anyways, overtime I changed the instruction to fit
better with the assessment. It would have been nice if those early classes would have had
their instruction laid out from the assessment.

How I Teach

SOURCE: http://www.kristimillertime.com/2012/01/listography-2012.html

Chemistry is a complicated subject. There is A LOT of information I have to get across to


my students. As such I have always kept my classes very basic: a little lecture, work
problems, more lecture, repeat and throw in a few demonstrations here and there.
Assessments are always homework assignments, quizzes, and exams. It’s the way I was
taught. As we learned in this class, this is not the best idea. I have always opposed trying
new of experiences in my courses for fear of losing content that my students will need in the
future. I learned, in this class, that new technology can be used in a variety of ways to
enhance learning. As a simple example, our course had an interactive course calendar and
an course syllabus that was useful. My students rarely look at my syllabi since it is the
standard LR template (just words and a few links). The interactive course calendar was
shocking to me because it seems like such as simple idea but it was SO useful throughout
the term. I still wonder why I never thought of that. That will definitely be included in my
courses starting this fall.

Conclusion
SOURCE: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/sat4.html

On the whole, this course has been an eye opening experience. I learned that there is a
science to instructional design. It is not this haphazard system that I have used in the past.
Instead there are supposed to be steps. Within each of those steps, new technology can be
added, new ideas explored. Overall I think that this course will dramatically change the way
I develop my courses in the future.

You might also like