SEARLE, Humphrey. Schoenberg and Music Today PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Schoenberg and Music Today

Author(s): Humphrey Searle


Source: Perspectives of New Music, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Autumn - Winter, 1974), pp. 56-57
Published by: Perspectives of New Music
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/832369
Accessed: 19/02/2009 17:51

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=pnm.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Perspectives of New Music is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Perspectives
of New Music.

http://www.jstor.org
SCHOENBERG AND MUSIC TODAY

HUMPHREY SEARLE

I never met Schoenberg, unfortunately: I was only nineteen when he


left Europe for America, and I did not get an opportunity of going to the
States until many years after his death. But we did correspond toward the
end of his life: I was writing a new article about him for the fifth edition
of Grove's Dictionary, and in a letter giving me information about his
latest works he wrote: "It should be mentioned, that in my opinion, in the
formula: the method of composing with 12 tones, the accent does not lie
so much on 12 tones, but on the art of composing." It is interesting to
think what he might have said about the mathematical methods of some
present-day composers. I was able to arrange the British publication of his
books Style and Idea and Structural Functions of Harmony, and shortly
before his death the BBC asked me to find out if he would be willing to
record a talk for the weekly Sunday radio program "Music Magazine." His
reply was characteristic:
Your message has suggested to me at once a subject: Advice for Begin-
ners in Composition with Twelve Tones. Unfortunately when I con-
ceived this idea, I had forgotten that television is not so general in use
in England than in America. Thus I don't know whether this lecture
which will use many musical examples, coming into effect only if one
reads them, is acceptable for the BBC. There would still be a possibility
to print in a cheap manner sheets containing these examples, if the BBC
can distribute them in time. Namely the examples will bring so many
changes the improvement of which is perhaps less easily to realize by the
ear than by the eye.
I must admit that this lecture will be very technical and direct itself to
the higher educated musician, to those who can apply the advice I give
them in their composition. Thus it is much less theoretical or aesthetical
than technical-compositorial. Of course musicologists might profit there-
from and add much of the knowledge I procure them to their tools of
criticism. Besides, it will clarify many problems of this technique and
* 56?
SCHOENBERG AND MUSIC TODAY

prove how much inspiration must contribute in order to create a real


work of art.

Schoenberg did begin this lecture-it is numbered 137 in Josef Rufer's


catalogue of his articles-and it is sad that it was never finished.
In an earlier letter I had suggested that it might be a good idea to form
some kind of an association of 12-tone composers, who in 1948 were few
and far between. Schoenberg was very interested in the idea and wrote:
"it might be possible to produce a book in which all members of the associ-
ation describe their own approach to 12-tones." Something of the sort was
in fact done in the appendix to the first edition of Rufer's Composition
with Twelve Notes.
And what of Schoenberg today? One critic wrote: "Stockhausen is as
far from Schoenberg as Schoenberg was from Schumann" and this may
well be true. Also Stockhausen can often fill a concert hall with a program
of his works, especially with young people, whereas Schoenberg cannot
always: does this invalidate Schoenberg? I don't think so. What people
are looking for-and getting-in Stockhausen is quite different from what
they expect from Schoenberg, and these two composers are bound to
appeal to different audiences. In spite of his new ideas which revolution-
ized the whole of modern music, Schoenbergbelieved in the traditional art
of composition: he did not leave things to chance or to his interpreters,
and his works cover an enormous range of musical expression. In the first
two letters quoted above he laid great stresson "the art of composing" and
on "how much inspiration must contribute in order to create a real work
of art." That is why I feel that his music will have a permanent and highly
important place in musical history when many present-day experiments
are forgotten. He was one of the great geniuses of our age.

* 57 0

You might also like