Contract of Agency: Submitted To
Contract of Agency: Submitted To
Contract of Agency: Submitted To
Section: 01
Submitted to
Fariha Abedin
Senior Lecturer
Department of Law
East West University
Report On:
Contract of Agency
Submitted by
Tamim Rahman
ID: 2017-3-10-011
INTRODUCTION: Section- 182 of the Contract Act, 1872 states that an agent is employed to
do any act to represent principle in dealings with third person regarding business or other
activities. The contract which creates this relationship between a principal and an agent is the
contract of agency.
Related case: Carr v. Hunt (Dallas 1983)
Illustration: Suppose “A” has a manufacturing company in Bangladesh and through “B” a is
doing all the sales around Bangladesh. Over here “B” is an agent of ‘A’. real estate agent,
securities agent, insurance agent also falls under this category.
Types of agency:
By express authority: A contract of agency can be made orally or in writing. Example of
a written contract of agency gives a right to an agency to act on behalf of his principal in
according to terms and conditions. If agent acts outside the scope of his given powers, the
agent will be liable for any losses.
By implied authority: It is an authority that is neither express or written into a contract,
but it is authority an agent is considered to have in order to transact the business for his
principal. For example, an agent can odder goods from a third party on behalf of the
principle.
Related Case: Chan Yin Tee v William Jacks and Co.
By necessity: The origins of the doctrine of necessitous by a person to act on behalf of
the principal without receiving authorization by in an urgent situation, for example, if a
person gets lunatic his family member or lawyer can take decisions on behalf of him.
Related case: Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield
Competency of being an agent:
Sound mind of age: Section 183, states that, any person who is of the age of majority
and sound minded can be employed as an agent. These two elements are a necessity
because an agent has to answer to the Principal for his activities. Agents rational
judgment has a huge impact on principle.
Related Case: K.S. Ramachandra Rao vs state of A. Pradesh (2009)
Unsound minded and Minor Agent: Section 184 states that, a minor or unsound
minded can also become and agent. But, in this case a principle has to bear a risk.
Because he will be liable of agent’s activity. For example: A lunatic patient, who has at
intervals of sound mind. And during that unsound interval period if we make any agency
contract, for any un rational judgement the principle will be liable.
Related Case: Madon Gopal V/S Hindu Biscuit
Consideration: Section 185 states that “Consideration not necessary”. No consideration
is necessary to create an Agency”. An agent can do any activities on principle as a gift,
charity, favor, Bailment and in good will. Even without an expression of consideration
agents are expected to get paid for the performance of service.
Related Case: Kuthari Carpet V/s Income tax officer (1984)