Sea Fastening PDF

GEC CHENNAI

TPIL – SUBSEA – INTERNAL MEMORANDUM

Project No.
Project Shell Perdido Phase 2
078268C
Revision:
Ref. No. Memo‐078268C‐GECC‐SUBSEA‐STR‐287
A

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF RESTING FRAME AND SEAFASTENING
DESIGN MEMO

A 22‐May‐2020 Issued for Review MDG NPR / KNL FSI
Rev. Date Revision Description Issued by Reviewed by Approved by

This document and all information contained herein are the confidential and exclusive property of TechnipFMC,
and may not be reproduced, disclosed, or made public in any manner prior to express written authorization by TechnipFMC.

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF RESTING FRAME
Page 2 of 57
Perdido Phase 2 AND SEAFASTENING DESIGN MEMO

CONTENT
1 OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................................... 3
2 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Contractor Document ................................................................................................................. 4
2.2 Code and Standards .................................................................................................................... 4
3 TECHNICAL DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................. 5
3.1 Resting Frame Data .................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Resting Frame Dimensions ......................................................................................................... 5
3.3 Materials ..................................................................................................................................... 5
4 DESIGN METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Model Description ...................................................................................................................... 6
4.2 Boundary Condition .................................................................................................................... 6
4.3 Load Description ......................................................................................................................... 7
4.3.1 Lifting Load Case: .......................................................................................................... 7
4.3.2 Transit Load Case: ......................................................................................................... 8
5 RESULT SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 13
5.1 Lifting Condition ....................................................................................................................... 13
5.2 Transportation Condition ......................................................................................................... 14
APPENDIX A ACCELERATION CALCULATION .................................................................................. 15
APPENDIX B SEAFASTENING CALCULATION .................................................................................. 17
APPENDIX C ANGLE STOPPER CALCULATION FOR GOOSENECK FRAME BOTTOM BASE PLATE ...... 23
APPENDIX D STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF COLUMN STIFFENER PLATE ..................... 30
APPENDIX E RESULT SUMMARY OF GOOSENECK FRAME ............................................................. 38
APPENDIX F STRUCTURAL FABRICATION DRAWINGS ................................................................... 52

Page 3 of 57

1 OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this document is to:

 Design and analysis of the resting frame that will be used to transport the Gooseneck with handling
frame assembly.
 Design checks for the gooseneck base plate angle stopper calculations.
 Design checks for column supporting stiffener for chain lashing arrangement from the adjustment
yoke to latch on the frame.

A general assembly of the Gooseneck frame with resting frame is shown in the Figure 1‐1.

This design memo summarizes the analysis results in accordance with industry codes and standards.

Figure 1‐1 Resting Frame General Arrangement

Page 4 of 57

2 REFERENCES
2.1 CONTRACTOR DOCUMENT

Ref. Title Document Number
[1]. Engineering Task Description 078268C ‐ETD‐007
[2]. Shell Perdido Basis of Design PD‐105‐AA‐7704‐0000001‐000_002
[3]. 12in Gooseneck General Arrangement Drawing DU100327146
[4]. 6in Gooseneck General Arrangement Drawing 1 DU100325677
[5]. 6in Gooseneck General Arrangement Drawing 2 DU100342940
2.2 CODE AND STANDARDS

Ref. Title Document Number
AISC – Manual of steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design; 14th AISC 360‐16
[6].
Edition
Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing
[7]. API RP 2A – WSD
Fixed Offshore Platforms – Working Stress Design, 21st Edition.
[8]. Structural Design of Offshore ships DNVGL‐OS‐C102

Page 5 of 57

3 TECHNICAL DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS
3.1 RESTING FRAME DATA
The resting frame assembly (refer Figure 3‐1) is designed to hold the gooseneck frame assembly refer Figure 1‐1
during the transportation in the Deep Star vessel.

Figure 3‐1 Base Resting Frame
3.2 RESTING FRAME DIMENSIONS
The resting frame is designed such that the gooseneck frame assemblies can fit and to hold it during the
transportation of all three gooseneck assemblies. Refer [3],[4] and [5] for the overall dimensions of the gooseneck
for all three assemblies (6in two and a 12in).

Dimension Value Reference
Length 4241.8mm
Width 3708.4mm Appendix E
Height 3969.9mm
Table 3‐2 – Resting Frame Dimensions
3.3 MATERIALS
Table 3‐3 lists the material properties considered for the resting frame.
Material Minimum Yield
Items
Specification Strength
SHST 8X8x0.5 ASTM A500 50 ksi
STIFFENER PLATE ASTM A36 36 ksi
Table 3‐3 ‐ Materials List

Page 6 of 57

4 DESIGN METHODOLOGY
The structural verification of the resting frame has been performed in SACS finite element analysis.
4.1 MODEL DESCRIPTION
The resting frame has been designed for lifting and transportation of the gooseneck frame assembly for all three
gooseneck (2 off 6in Gooseneck and one 12in Gooseneck). The resting frame is modelled as linear structural
beam elements and the same is shown in Figure 4‐1.

Figure 4‐1 Isometric View of Resting Frame
4.2 BOUNDARY CONDITION
The base resting frame is restrained at the location where seafastening gusset are welded. The boundary
conditions are considered as showed in the Figure 4‐2.

Figure 4‐2 Boundary Condition

Page 7 of 57

4.3 LOAD DESCRIPTION
The analysis and design of the resting frame has been performed by considering the vessel acceleration and the
reactions considered from the reactions loads of goose neck frame assembly as referred Appendix E.

Refer Appendix – A for the detailed acceleration calculations.

There are two load cases considered in the design of the resting frame:

4.3.1 Lifting Load Case:
The resting frame will be handled on the vessel with a 4 points lifting scheme. According to reference [7] the factor
for offshore lifting is 2.0, which is applied to the total applied load.

The lifting analysis has been performed by considering the self‐weight of members and the lifting reactions
from Gooseneck frame analysis

Figure 4‐2 shows the lifting reactions from Gooseneck frame analysis.

For detailed calculations refer Appendix E.

Figure 4‐3 Transit and Lifting Reaction of Gooseneck Frame

The lifting hook is assumed as fixed and soft springs are added on all corners of the frame to keep the model
stable and allow it to converge. A spring constant of 1 kN/m is assumed and it is negligible. The lifting load plots
are shown in Figure 4‐4.

Page 8 of 57

Figure 4‐4 Lifting Load Plot for Resting Frame
Note:
The hook point connected to the spreader bar is modelled as dummy member and those stress value are not
required for the calculations and hence we can skip those results.

4.3.2 Transit Load Case:
The transit analysis has been performed by considering the maximum reactions load forces from gooseneck
frame are considered on top of the column of resting frame and vessel motion acceleration forces calculated as
per Appendix A.

Figure 4‐2 shows the reaction load forces of the Gooseneck frame. For detailed calculations refer Appendix E.

The load plots showed in Figure 4‐5 to 4‐7 are the maximum reactions forces from Gooseneck frame to resting
frame.

Page 9 of 57

Figure 4‐5 Maximum Reaction @X from Gooseneck Frame

Figure 4‐6 Maximum Reaction @Y from Gooseneck Frame

Page 10 of 57

Figure 4‐7 Maximum Reaction @Z from Gooseneck Frame

Table 4‐1 shows the summary load combinations considered in the transit analysis.

Vertical Load Longitudinal Load Transverse Load
Load Case
kN kN kN
Min Heave + Transverse ‐ 71.5
25.4
(LC1)
Max Heave + Transverse ‐ 71.5
40.7
(LC2)
Min Heave + Longitudinal ‐
19.7 42.7
(LC3)
Min Heave + Longitudinal ‐
46.3 42.7
(LC4)
Table 4‐1 ‐ Transportation Forces on Resting Frame

Figure 4‐8 to Figure 4‐11 shows the load plots of load combinations considered during transportation analysis.

Page 11 of 57

Figure 4‐8 – Min Heave + Transverse (LC1)

Figure 4‐9 – Max Heave + Transverse (LC2)
Page 12 of 57

Figure 4‐10 – Min Heave + Longitudinal (LC‐3)
Figure 4‐11 – Max Heave + Longitudinal (LC‐4)

Page 13 of 57

5 RESULT SUMMARY
5.1 LIFTING CONDITION

The maximum unity check for the lifting case is 0.51.

Figure 5‐1 – Lifting Condition Unity Check

Page 14 of 57

5.2 TRANSPORTATION CONDITION
The maximum unity check for the transportation case is 0.78

Figure 5‐2 – Transportation Condition Unity Check

Page 15 of 57

APPENDIX A ACCELERATION CALCULATION

Project Number - Project Title BASE RESTING FRAME SEAFASTENING Date: 13-05-20
Ref Inputs by: MDG
Spreadsheet OED-GEP-261-03 Rev 5 - Vessel Motions Checked by: RPR/KNL
Ship Parameters
Vessel name d Service restriction R0
Length btw perp. L 133.0 m k-factor for rolling k 1.0 - Position of Centre of Motion
Max. moulded breadth B 30.0 m Displacement at T Disp 28,322 Te - Longi. from aft perp. x_v 59.85 m
Moulded depth D 8.5 m Metacentric height GM 2.10 m - Vert. above baseline z_v 4.25 m
Moulded summer draft T 7.5 m Roll radius of gyration kr 11.70 m
Max. Service Speed V 10.0 kt Block coefficient Cb 0.92 - Vessel data reviewed by OED
Cargo Parameters
Item 1 1.00 1
Cargo location:
- Longitudinal (from AP) x 1.85 m
- Lateral (from CL) y 12.88 m
- Vertical (from deck) z_c 1.12 m
Base height above deck z_b 0.00 m
Cargo overall dimensions:

- Length (along longi axis) La+Lf 9.60 m
- Width (along trans. axis) Ls+Lp 6.10 m
- Height H 3.97 m
Cargo Mass M 3.6 Te

Derivation of Accelerations to DNV Rules for Ships Pt.3 Ch.1 Sec.4.
B200 Basic parameters B500 Pitch motion and acc. B700 Combined transverse acc.
Wave Coef. CW 8.59 Pitch angle (single amp.) th 0.10 rad. Vert. component RR RRV 5.3707 m
Speed Coef. CV 0.20 CVl 0.87 Period Pitch Tp 6.6 sec Transv. comp. roll acc. ary 0.33 m/s2
2
Com. acc. parameter ao 0.36722 Dist. from CoM to z Rp 58.2 m Combined transv. acc. at 4.31 m/s
Tangential pitch acc. ap 0.09 rad/s2
B300 Surge, sway/yaw and heave acc. B600 Combined vertical acc.
2
Surge acc. ax 0.69212 m/s Horiz. component RR RRH 12.9 m B800 Combined longitudinal acc.
Comb. sway/yaw acc. ay 1.08 m/s2 Horiz. component RP RPH 58.0 m Vert. component RP RPV 5.37 m
Heave acc. az 2.62 m/s2 Vert. comp. roll acc. arz 0.79 m/s2 Long. comp. pitch acc. apx 0.48 m/s2
Vert. comp. pitch acc. apz 5.20 m/s2 Combined longi. acc. al 1.61 m/s
2
B400 Roll motion and acc. Combined vertical acc. av 5.83 m/s2
Period Roll TR 16.1 sec Comb vert. acc. with sway avr 2.739 m/s2 Quartering acc. - DNVGL-ST-N001 Sec. 11.6.4
Roll Angle (Single amp.) ph 0.40 rad. Comb vert. acc. with surge avp 5.83 m/s2 Long. comp. (0.6*al) aql 0.97 m/s2
Dist. from CoM to z RR 13.95 m Trans. comp. (0.8*at) aqt 3.45 m/s2
Tangential roll acc. ar 0.06102 rad/s
2
Heave [(0.8*arz+0.6*apz)2 + az2 ]0.5 avq 4.58 m/s2
Combined Accelerations at CoG User Notes
Accelerations combined to DNV-ST-N001 Section 11.6.5:
Transit region World-wide
Planned operation period TPOP 0 days Design Loads at CoG

C500 reduction on heave C500_v 0.50 - Design method WSD
C500 reduc. on horiz. acc. C500_h 0.67 - Incl. wind pressure of 1.6 kN/m2
2
m/s g kN
Longi. Trans. Vert. Longi. Trans. Vert. Longi. Trans. Vert.
Transv. - Min heave - 2.89 6.97 - 0.29 0.71 Transv. - Min heave - 71.5 25.4
Transv. - Max heave - 2.89 11.18 - 0.29 1.14 Transv. - Max heave - 71.5 40.7
Longi. - Min heave 1.08 - 5.42 0.11 - 0.55 Longi. - Min heave 42.7 - 19.7
Longi. - Max heave 1.08 - 12.72 0.11 - 1.30 Longi. - Max heave 42.7 - 46.3
Quartering - Min heave 0.65 2.31 6.05 0.07 0.24 0.62 Quartering - Min heave 29.8 51.5 22.0
Quartering - Max heave 0.65 2.31 12.10 0.07 0.24 1.23 Quartering - Max heave 29.8 51.5 44.0
Cleats and Corner Loads

Max. reaction force on each cleat for a rectangular box with 2 cleats each side.
Overall dimensions
- La 4.80 m Port & stb cleats (2 each side) (±Heave ±Roll)
- Lf 4.80 m Max. vertical uplift per cleat 4.5 kN
- Ls 3.05 m Max. horizontal shear (transverse) per cleat 35.7 kN
- Lp 3.05 m Fwd & aft cleats (2 each end) ( ± Heave ±Pitch)
Max. vertical uplift per cleat No Uplift
Cleats location Max. horizontal shear (longitudinal) per cleat 21.3 kN
- Oa 2.14 m Compression at corner of item (+Heave, ±Heave ±Roll, ±Heave ±Pitch)
- Of 2.14 m Max. vertical compression at corner 21.1 kN
- Os 2.78 m Quartering Seas
- Op 2.78 m Max. Compression at corner 21.8 kN
Max Uplift at corner 5.3 kN
Max. horizontal shear (transv.) per cleat 25.8 kN
Max. horizontal shear (longi.) per cleat 14.9 kN
Page 17 of 57

APPENDIX B SEAFASTENING CALCULATION

PERDIDO Inputs by:MDG
Inputs checked by:
10/3/2020
Fixity_3 Brackets - hooked over lower flange of seafastened item
INPUTS
Bracket reference
Cargo name DEEP STAR
Bracket reference (name or ID)
Bracket type Custom
Standard bracket number
Bracket geometric properties

dim1 205 mm
dim2 175 mm
dim3 300 mm
dim4 240 mm
dim5 180 mm
dim6 200 mm
dim7 435 mm
dim8 105 mm
Plate thickness (thk) 12 mm
Cargo geometric properties

Cargo flange internal width (b_flange) 203 mm
Cargo flange thickness (t_flange) 203 mm
Gap deck (h_gap) 0 mm
Deck details for under deck checks

Deck plate thickness (t_deck) 20 mm
Under deck weld leg (z_u) 8.0 mm
Forces
Horizontal (Ph) 95.1 kN
Vertical (Pv) 116.8 kN
Weld details (leg length)

Deck weld leg (z_b) 8.0 mm
Weld to base done on vessel deck
Design method (Choice applies to all brackets)

Design code - Above deck DNV-OS-C102 (WSD)
Design code - Below deck DNV Rules for ships (WSD)
Material properties
Steel grade, bracket S 355
Steel grade, base (deck) S 355
Steel grade, cargo / equipment S 355
OUTPUTS
Welds utilisations
Base weld 0.92
Under deck weld 0.86
Brackets utilisations
Maximum stress utilisation 0.93
Bracket bearing utilisation 0.12
Buckling check Pass
Geometry check
Cut out length versus flange width OK(98 mm margin)
TC created by: JMcE

Page 1 OED-TC-2302 rev 3.0 TC checked by: MPI
Inputs checked by:
10/3/2020
Cut out versus cargo fastening height OK (2 mm green)
CONCLUSION
Bracket fit for purpose
TC created by: JMcE

Inputs checked by:
10/3/2020
Material Allowable Stresses

For thickness below 40 mm
fu, bracket 490 MPa
fu, deck 490 MPa
fu, cargo 490 MPa
Fyd, bracket 355 MPa
Correlation factor, β w base 0.89
Correlation factor, β w cargo 0.89
Above deck DNV WSD (DNV-OS-C102)

Base weld usage factor η0w 0.52
Bracket usage factor η0w 0.67
Allowable stress, Base weld 286 MPa
Allowable stress, Bracket 238 MPa
Allowable bearing, Bracket 320 MPa
Below deck DNV Rules for Ships WSD method

Material factor for weld 1.42
Allowable shear stress, weld 128 MPa
Maximum permissible stresses

Design resistance, Base weld 286 MPa
Design resistance, Bracket 238 MPa
Bearing resistance, Bracket 320 MPa
Permissible shear stress, under deck w 128 MPa
Preliminary Calculations
Moment at base (M) 5.72E+07 N.mm
Vertical reaction (Pv) 116809 N
Young's modulus (E) 205000 MPa
Horizontal reaction (Ph) 95113 N
Weld to base throat (a_b) 5.7 mm
Under deck weld throat (a_u) 5.7 mm
Bracket and Welds Strength Checks
Weld Stresses
Base (Section 5-5)

Weld length 435 mm
Weld modulus at base 7.76E+07 mm⁴
Normal stress at base 130 MPa
Shear normal at base 130 MPa
Shear at base 19 MPa
Equivalent stress, base 262 MPa
Under deck (Section 5-5)

Underdeck weld length 475 mm
Weld modulus, under deck 1.01E+08 mm⁴
Normal stress, under deck 110 MPa
Shear normal, under deck 110 MPa
TC created by: JMcE

Inputs checked by:
10/3/2020
Plate Stresses
Bearing btw item flange and bracket

Contact area 2436 mm²
Contact stress 39 MPa
Section 1-1
Plate area at cargo 2100 mm
Plate modulus at cargo 5359375 mm²
Axial stress, cargo 0 MPa
Bending stress, cargo 0 MPa
Shear stress, cargo 56 MPa
Equivalent stress, cargo 96 MPa
Section 2-2
Section length 175 mm
Plate area 2100 mm²
Plate modulus 5.36E+06 mm⁴
Bending stress 200 MPa
Shear stress 56 MPa
Equivalent stress 222 MPa
Section 3-3
angle from horizontal 0.64 rad
Section Length 257 mm
Plate modulus 1.70E+07 mm⁴
Local normal force 70085 N
Local shear force 93447 N
Axial stress, 23 MPa
d, horizontal 154 mm
d, vertical 206 mm
Shear stress 30 MPa
Section 4-4
Section length 428 mm
Plate modulus 78586079 MPa
Axial stress 23 MPa
Shear stress 19 MPa
Section 5-5
Plate area at base 5220 mm²
Plate modulus at base 8.23E+07 mm⁴
Axial stress, base 22 MPa
Bending stress, base 151 MPa
Shear stress, base 18 MPa
Equivalent stress, base 176 MPa
Plate section 1-1 (at cargo) 0.41

Plate section 2-2 0.93
Plate section 5-5 (at base) 0.74
Maximum Plate utilisation 0.93
Bracket Buckling Strength
TC created by: JMcE

Inputs checked by:
10/3/2020
Column length (Lcol) 741 mm

Column effective length factor 2.0
Column moment of inertia 3.70E+04 mm⁴
Column section area 3084 mm²
Column radius of gyration 3 mm
Slenderness ratio 428
Width_thickness ratio 21.4
Noncompact limit 11
Additionnal limit 22
Allowable stress red fact (Qs) 0.65

Factor (Ccl) 132
Allowable stress 1 723 MPa
Allowable stress 2 6 MPa
Allowable stress (Fa) 6 MPa
Buckling Utilisation 0.99
Buckling check Pass
TC created by: JMcE

Page 23 of 57

APPENDIX C ANGLE STOPPER CALCULATION FOR GOOSENECK FRAME BOTTOM BASE PLATE


Page 1 of {6}
GOOSENECK ANGLE
STOPPER DESIGN CHECK
PERDIDO PHASE 2
1.0 ANGLE PLATE STOPPER DESIGN:
1.1 Material Properities:

Minimum Yield Strength of Angle Stopper Fy  36.ksi (ASTM A36)
Minimum Yield Strength of Deck (assumed) Fyd  34 ksi
Ultimate Tensile Strength of Welds Fexx  70 ksi
1.2 Allowable Stress:
1.3 Force on angle shear stopper:
Loads from Appendix D, Figure 17

Max load from STAAD pro analysis of Gooseneck frame bottom plate to angle stopper
Page 2 of {6}
GOOSENECK ANGLE
PERDIDO PHASE 2
FAS  103.14kN ( Max load)
1.4 Shear Stopper Geometry:
Length of section L1  12 in L2  24 in
Thickness of section Pthk  0.5in
Height of section L3  12in
Weld size w1  0.375  in w2  0.375in
Fillet throat thickness Th weld  w1  cos( 45deg)
2.0 ANGLE STOPPER DESIGN CHECK:

2.1 Direct Shear in Base metal:
FAS
Shear Stress on angle V_shear 
L1  Pthk V_shear  26.64  MPa
Unity Check V_shear

UC1  UC1  0.27
0.4 Fy
2.2 Bending on Shear Stopper:

L3
Inplane moment BMinp  FAS 
2
2
Pthk L1 3
Section modulus of shear stopper Sx   12 in
6
BMinp
Bending Stress σss  σss  79.93  MPa
Sx
Page 3 of {6}
GOOSENECK ANGLE
PERDIDO PHASE 2
σss
UC2  UC2  0.54
Unity Check 0.6 Fy
2.3 Shear Stopper Welds:

Weld treated as line. See Design of Welded Structures by Omer Blodgett
Inplane moment BMinp  139.12 kip  in

2
L1 2
Inplane section modulus per linear inch Sw   48 in
3
BMinp kip
Inplane bending force per linear inch Fbm   2.9
Sw in
Shear force per linear inch FAS kip

Fss   0.97
2L1 in
Resultant force per Linear inch 2 2 kip

Frss  Fbm  Fss  3.06
in
Frss
Wss 
Minimum weld size leg length 0.707  0.3 Fexx
Unity check Wss

UC3   0.55
w1
Page 4 of {6}
GOOSENECK ANGLE
PERDIDO PHASE 2
3.0 BOLT DESIGN CHECK:
Bolt material type : ASTM A193 B7
Minimum yield strength of bolts : Fy_bolt  720  MPa
Ultimate tensile strength of bolts : Fu_bolt  860  MPa
Minimum yield strength of connector Fy_plate  345MPa

support plate :
Shear load on Bolts Px  FAS
Px  103.14 kN (Max Load )
3.1 Allowable Stresses

Bolt nominal tensile stress Fnt  0.75 Fu_bolt Table J3.2, Ref. [2]
Bolt nominal shear stress Fnv  0.45 Fu_bolt Table J3.2, Ref. [2]
Allowable shear stress for plate τs  0.4 Fy_plate Eqn. G2-1, Ref. [2]
3.2 Bolt Pretension

Bolt type : Bolt_type  "I" (I : Imperial, M: Metric)
Nominal diameter : D  0.393701in ( M10x1 bolts)
Thread pitch : P  0.0393701  in
π 2
Stress Area : (Eqn. A-3-7 of Ref. [2].) As  [ D  ( 0.974  P) ] if Bolt_type = "I"
4
π 2
[ D  ( 0.9382 P) ] if Bolt_type = "M"
4
2
As  64 mm
E  D  0.75 P sin( 60deg) E  9.35 mm

Page 5 of {6}
GOOSENECK ANGLE
PERDIDO PHASE 2
Secant 30° : S  sec( 30deg)  1.155
Across flat width : H  1.5 D  3.175mm H  18.18  mm
Nut internal chamfer : K  3.175mm
Bolt pre-tension:
Reduction coefficient of the yield stress: cf  50% ( assumed)
Fpre  cf  Fy_bolt As Fpre  23 kN

Tightening torque - lubricated bolt :
Mean friction coefficient : μ  0.13
Torque factor : (Refer, Annexure D of [1])

Tf 

E P  π μ E S   μ  H  D  K 
 
2  π E  P μ S  4 
Torque : T_bolt2  Tf Fpre T_bolt2  43 N m
T_bolt2  32 lbf  ft
3.3 Bolt Checks

Force acting on the bolt connection is see shear load only.
ASD factor Ωb  2.0 Eqn. J3-1, Ref. [2]
Bolt pull out shear check:
Tapped hole length : Len  12.7mm( Gooseneck bottom plate thickess)
Pitch circle diameter of thread d p  D  0.64952  P  9.35 mm
2
Thread shear area Ass  0.5 π d p  Len  186.53 mm
Page 6 of {6}
GOOSENECK ANGLE
PERDIDO PHASE 2
Shear stress on tapped hole thread: Fpre

τbolt  τbolt  123.49 MPa
Ass
τbolt
Unity check : UC4  UC4  0.89
τs
Shear on bolts
It is assumed that a stopper plate (has 4 bolt) itself resist the connector lateral loads during jumper
transportation.
No.of bolts under shear/tension: NBs  10
Fnv As
Fs.bolt 
Available shear capacity per bolt Ωb
Fs.bolt  12.38  kN
2
Px
Actual shear per bolt Ps.bolt 
NBs
Ps.bolt
Unity Check - Shear UC5  UC5  0.83
Fs.bolt
4.0 ANGLE STOPPER SUMMARY:

UC1  0.27
Direct shear stress Unity check of plate
UC2  0.54
Bending stress in plate Unity check of plate
UC3  0.55
Shear stress on weld Unity check of plate
Bolt pull out shear Unity check UC4  0.89
Shear Unity Check of bolts UC5  0.83

Page 30 of 57

APPENDIX D STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF COLUMN STIFFENER PLATE


Shell Perdido STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF COLUMN STIFFENER Page 31 of 57
Phase 2
1 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this memo is to determine the structural assessment for column supporting stiffener for chain
lashing arrangement from the adjustment yoke to latch on the frame.
2 TECHNICAL DATA
2.1 GOOSENECK FRAME DETAILS

The structural assessment of column supporting stiffener for chain lashing arrangement from the adjustment
yoke to latch on the frame with loads referred from Appendix E.
Figure 2-1 shows the isometric view of Gooseneck frame.
Figure 2-1 Isometric View of Gooseneck Frame
Figure 2-2 shows the side view of Gooseneck frame.
Figure 2-2 Side View of Gooseneck frame

Phase 2
2.2 MATERIAL
Table 3-2 list the material of the gooseneck frame column stiffener
Items Material Minimum Yield Strength

Stiffener Plate A572 Gr50 345MPa (50Ksi)
Table 2-1 Material Properties
2.3 DESIGN ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

The design requirement and stress criteria applied in the analysis are in accordance with DNVGL, Ref. [9]
σA = ɳiσy
Where:
σA = Allowable Von Mises stress
ɳi = Design load factor for specified load condition
σy = Specified minimum yield stress of pile material
The summarized design factors are given as load factor (ɳi) = 0.8 as per Table 6 of Ref. [8]
The allowable stress (σA) =276MPa
Phase 2
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 MODEL DESCRIPTION

The column stiffener plate is utilized to secure the hold down rigging from the adjustable frame. The lashing to
be redirected to the opposite side of the frame in order to make it easier to remove when the frame is at a 45
deg position as per Figure 2-2. The structural integrity assessment has been performed using ANSYS 19.2 FEA
software.
The Figure 3‐1 shows the FE model mesh.
Figure 3-1 Meshed Stiffener Model
3.2 LOAD CASE CONSIDERATION

Analysis is performed against the maximum load case of 45 degree seafastening as shown in Table 3-1. The
rigging pull down loads are referred from Appendix D which is showed in Table 3-1. The loads and boundary
conditions applied to the STAADpro model are shown in Figure 3-2.
Figure 3-2 Load and Boundary Condition for Column Stiffener Lashing Plate in STAADpro Model
Phase 2
Rigging Pull Down Force from Appendix D
Model Fx (kN)
45 degree seafastening 89.72
45 degree lift to hook 76.00
Horizontal seafastening 52.24
Horizontal lift to hook 51.01
Vertical seafastening 8.16
Vertical lift to hook 0.00
Horizontal lift to trolleys 41.72
45 Lift to trolleys 76.11

Table 3-1 Rigging Pull Down Loads
3.3 BOUNDARY CONDITION AND LOADING

To simulate the actual behaviour of the column stiffener during rigging of lashing arrangement from the
adjustment yoke. The FE model is restrained in the bottom and side face of stiffener and the maximum
load case is considered as 89.72 kN in an out of plane of 45 degree to make the design conservative as
per Table 3-1.
Figure 3-3 shows the boundary Condition and loading.
Figure 3-3 Load and Boundary Condition

Phase 2
4 RESULTS AND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 FE ANALYSIS RESULTS
The following figures shows the Von Mises stress distribution and total deformation of column stiffener during the
proposed rigging down loads.
Figure 4-1 Von Mises Stress Distribution for Plate
The peak von-mises stress in the stiffener plate is observed is 315.61 MPa, however the peak stresses
(1)
appear in the weld area where the weld material propery is higher than the base material. Further the peak
stress is appear to be in the skin of the element, hence this peak stress at this element can be ignored. The
next higher equivalent stress is considered as the max stress on the stiffener plate. Figure 4-2 shows the
stresses in the hole where the stress are actually need to be assessed where the lashing arrangement is going
to be connected.
Figure 4-2 Von Mises Stress Distribution for Hole Area

Phase 2
Figure 4-3 Total Deformation
4.2 UNITY CHECK RESULTS

The unity check result of the Column stiffener shown in Table 4-1.
Load Case Allowable Observed Unity

Stress (MPa) Stress (MPa) Check
Load Case 276 202.95 0.73
Table 4-1 Unity Check Values
Phase 2
5 CONCLUSION
From the above results it is conclusive that the structural assessment of column stiffener plate is fit for the
rigging pull down loads for the gooseneck handling frame.
Page 38 of 57

APPENDIX E RESULT SUMMARY OF GOOSENECK FRAME

PERDIDO ‐ ETD 005 GOOSE NECK HANDLING FRAME – INITIAL DESIGN ASSESMENT
Overall Frame Analysis and Local Loads
Introduction
This document will present the initial overall assessment for the Gooseneck Handling Frame. The objective
of the document is to provide data for project decision regarding steel section to be used and to provide
detailed local load data for the secondary local analysis to be undertaken.
The analysis is performed using finite element software STAAD pro, using only beam elements.
Input Data/MODEL
INFORMATION SOURCE
All geometrical information was extracted from Teams Folder space claim model:
TECHNIPFMC\ETDs Perdido 078268C ‐ ETD 005 Gooseneck Handling Frame\1.0 ETD‐Goby‐

Inputs\NAM_Inputs\Final_DesignConcept
The main sections used are as per the space claim dimensions and in accordance with for the BOM.docx.
Steel grade is considered in line with the 50 ksi (345 MPa) yield stress.
SECTIONS CONSIDERED
Main Beams:

Trunnions:

Yoke Beam (probably will be modified during the YOKE detail design to support the lateral padeyes and
loads):

The above sections typology are the only ones to be structurally analyzed in accordance with AISC WSD
methodology.
The remaining model is uses other elements, such as cables (2 cm diameter for all rigging) and dummy
elements for the contacts and for the gooseneck body. The padeye plates were designed considering 200
mm x 20 mm element that is not structurally analyzed but should have appropriate stiffness for load
transfer paths to be simulated by the model.

Figure 1 – Overall Model Rendering
MODEL DETAILS/CONSIDERATIONS
The model is designed considering a series of non‐linearities, such as contact only and tension only
elements.
The tension element will simulate the two‐rigging elements that will “restrain” the gooseneck down
locking the adjustable frame and yoke in position. A third tension only element will simulate the cargo
strap/chain that will secure the main body of the gooseneck to the frame (back lashing).
Compression only element will be used at the base of the gooseneck, to simulate the bearing load of the
gooseneck due to weight. Two specific ones will be placed on the diagonal directions at the back and will
simulate the two Shear Stops at the base of the frame.
Compression only elements are also used at the top of the frame, in combinations with hinges to simulate
the rail, where the adjustable frame and yoke will slide in. The hinges will allow all the potential (Y in
picture below) loads to flow into the tension only elements, and to the base of the frame.
A hinge is also added on the padeye location to simulate the pin. Please note that a connecting padeye
between the YOKE and the adjustment frame was also added as per Fernando’s suggestion shared on the
general Teams discussion.
The Yoke beam is pinned at both ends (where it engages the adjustment frame).

Figure 2 – Non Linearity location on the main frame.
Load Cases Presented
The load cases that were studied are in accordance with the package request. Therefore, the analysis
compromises:
‐ Seafastening and Lift (1 point lift as it is the worst case for lifting) for the horizontal and vertical
position.
‐ Seafastening and Lift (2 point lift) for the 45 deg position.
A total number of 6 models were developed.
LIFT LOAD FACTORS
All lift cases were performed with an overall factor of 2.0 acting on top of the gravity action. For the one
lift point rigging arrangements a skew effect of 40/60% was considered between diagonal slings.
SEAFASTENING LOAD FACTORS
The seafastening was performed considering DEEP STAR, with the accelerations extracted from OED‐GEP‐
261‐03 Rev5 acceleration spreadsheet. The input for the spreadsheet is accordance with Thomas Skeels
email FW: 078382C004‐ETD‐FU‐010 ‐ Barracuda ‐ EDM Sea Fastening Layout (LT to TT) available on the Teams project files.
The accelerations were taken on the aft port or starboard, in order to create a worst case scenario.

Figure 3 – Vessel Accelerations 10^‐8
The maximum vertical accelerations 8,28 m/s2 was factored with gravity to an overall factor of
(g+8.28)/g=1.84.
The lateral maximum acceleration 4,61 m/s2 was factored by gravity to an overall factor of 4.61/g = 0.47.

These loads will be applied over the structure mass, as a factor of g constant which is also applied in the
horizontal directions.
Gravity is applied directly into the structure frame highlighted below, using the profiles that are defined
above. This gravity is not applied on any dummy or connecting element.
The Gooseneck weight is applied at a COG node, in the gooseneck dummy beams. This COG node is
modeled 1.9 meters above the base of the gooseneck, which is conservatively higher than the COG of the
12’’ gooseneck cog (1.6 meters). This will magnify the reaction loads on the yoke, and adjustable frame
mechanism.
The Gooseneck has modeled with a nominal weight of 100 kN (10 mTE). The COG and weight of the
gooseneck are these same for all the models, including lifts.
These loads were then combined as below to the to the critical seafastening loading conditions.

Figure 4 – Seafastening Load Combinations
Critical Design Loads Presented for Detailed Analysis
This report will present the critical design loads for the design of:
1 ‐ Yoke (maximum moments on main beam, loads on connecting padeye and loads at connection
to adjustment frame)
2 ‐ Adjustment Frame (maximum moments on frame, loads on connecting padeye and loads at
connection to main frame)
3 ‐ Pull Down Rigging Maximum Tension (Rigging connecting the adjustment frame and the base
of the main frame).
4 ‐ Bottom Shear Stops (Shear stops at the base of the gooseneck)
5 ‐ Maximum Tension on the Gooseneck “back” lashing. (Connecting the pedestal of the
gooseneck to the frame).

Unity ratios for all structural member is presented for all the six models. No failure was achieved using
the preliminary design/concept sections defined in the input data. Unity ratios are low, in some cases.
Especially for the resting frame so there is margin for reduction.
MODEL 1 & 7– 45 Deg (Resting Frame) Sea fastening Condition

Figure 5 – AISC ASD Unity Ratios for the MODEL 1
MODEL 2 – 45 Deg 2 Point Lift – Extended Trunnion

Figure 6 ‐ AISC ASD Unity Ratios for the MODEL 2
MODEL 3 – Horizontal Seafastening Condition

MODEL 4 – Horizontal 1 Point Lift Condition Extended Trunnion


MODEL 5 – Vertical Seafastening Condition

Figure 9 – AISC ASD Unity Ratios for the MODEL 5
MODEL 6 – Vertical 1 Point Lift Condition


YOKE MAXIMUM DESIGN LOADS
The reaction presented in this section are just the max envelop of all load cases. The excel file. Detailed
Reaction Output Yoke + Handling Frame.xslx is to be provided with this memo.
The detailed information may allow for a least conservative, and more refined design.

Figure 11 – Local Axis, Beam and Node Identification
YOKE MAIN BEAM:
Mx My Mz

Fx (kN) Fy (kN) Fz (kN)
MODEL Load Case (kN*m) (kN*m) (kN*m)
1 Max Envelope 38.589 31.827 54.864 0 73.060 41.384
2 Max Envelope 40.525 43.639 56.191 0 75.204 57.945
3 Max Envelope 30.543 17.821 52.735 0 69.831 24.374
4 Max Envelope 65.493 25.317 88.827 0 119.225 34.812
5 Max Envelope 21.139 5.637 9.851 0 12.861 5.072
6 Max Envelope 3.099 4.161 3.204 0 4.406 2.810
YOKE Lower Padeyes (to gooseneck) :
Mx My Mz

1 Max Envelope 103.945 34.271 20.764 17.356 8.380 17.135
2 Max Envelope 149.147 35.463 0 0 0 17.731
3 Max Envelope 61.466 32.554 15.995 13.381 6.421 16.277
4 Max Envelope 96.527 56.293 0 0 0 28.147
5 Max Envelope 16.940 5.904 9.038 7.557 2.968 2.952
6 Max Envelope 14.938 2.159 0 0 0 1.080
YOKE Main Padeye :
Mx My Mz

1 Max Envelope 47.208 68.543 1.530 0 0 17.135
2 Max Envelope 67.859 70.927 0 0 0 17.731
3 Max Envelope 27.774 65.110 1.376 0 0 16.277
4 Max Envelope 43.362 112.589 12.346 0 2.973 28.147
5 Max Envelope 6.238 11.808 3.128 0 0 2.952
6 Max Envelope 6.512 4.319 0 0 0 1.080

ADJUSTMENT FRAME DESIGN LOADS

Figure 12‐ Local Axis, Beam and Node Identification
ADJUSTABLE FRAME MAIN UPPER BEAM:
Mx Mz
MODEL Load Case (kN*m) (kN*m)
1 Max Envelope 26.451 25.109 34.271 8.597 19.333
2 Max Envelope 13.723 35.464 35.233 8.864 47.867
3 Max Envelope 13.586 14.631 32.555 8.132 11.175
4 Max Envelope 12.646 13.795 56.421 10.140 15.582
5 Max Envelope 9.362 5.048 5.904 1.476 3.333
6 Max Envelope 35.176 3.259 2.117 1.860 1.664
ADJUSTABLE FRAME LATERAL BEAM UPPER SECTION:
Mx My Mz

1 Max Envelope 25.164 32.766 30.019 0 14.156 8.597
2 Max Envelope 35.278 34.163 40.525 0 20.262 8.864
3 Max Envelope 14.625 30.861 24.098 0 9.003 8.132
4 Max Envelope 13.784 54.580 34.588 0 3.385 10.140
5 Max Envelope 3.352 5.471 8.928 0 3.333 1.476
6 Max Envelope 1.415 2.117 3.099 0 1.550 1.860
ADJUSTABLE FRAME LATERAL BEAM LOWER SECTION:
Mx My Mz

1 Max Envelope 57.976 19.127 8.870 0 3.959 9.454
2 Max Envelope 79.772 19.485 0 0 0 9.648
3 Max Envelope 32.441 19.261 6.748 0 3.004 9.507
4 Max Envelope 39.112 34.842 30.906 0 13.908 17.287
5 Max Envelope 3.903 3.534 12.510 0 5.597 1.736
6 Max Envelope 0 0 0 0 0 0

ADJUSTABLE BEAM PADEYE SECTION (as it was the same length it matches exactly all value of the Yoke)
Mx My Mz

1 Max Envelope 47.208 68.544 1.530 0 0 17.136
2 Max Envelope 67.856 70.929 0 0 0 17.732
3 Max Envelope 27.774 65.110 1.376 0 0 16.278
4 Max Envelope 43.362 112.589 12.346 0 3.200 28.148
5 Max Envelope 6.238 11.808 3.128 0 0 2.952
6 Max Envelope 6.512 4.319 0 0 0 1.080
LATERAL BEAM TO RAIL Contact Beam Axis:
(Fy is always 0 as it is hinged to pass the load to the pull down rigging.)
Upper Beam To Rail Contact
Model Fx (kN) – Press Against Frame Fy (kN) Fz (kN) – Lateral Press to rail

1 15,37 0,00 6,63
2 26,80 0,00 3,45
3 12,73 0,00 7,05
4 47,95 0,00 9,07
5 0,00 0,00 1,79
6 38,28 0,00 1,42
Figure 13 – Upper Contact between handling frame
and main frame
LOWER BEAM TO RAIL Contact Beam Axis:
Lower Beam To Rail Contact
Model Fx (kN) – Press Against Frame Fy (kN) Fz (kN) – Lateral Press to rail

1 8,89 0,00 19,18
2 0,00 0,00 19,55
3 6,76 0,00 19,41
4 30,91 0,00 34,91
5 12,53 0,00 3,55
6 0,00 0,00 2,49
Figure 14 – Lower Contact between handling frame
and main frame

RIGGING AND SHEAR STOPS DESIGN LOADS

PULL DOWN RIGGING MAXIMUM TENSION

Figure 15 – Pull Down Rigging
BOTTOM SHEAR STOPS

Figure 16 – Bottom Shear Stops Location at the Gooseneck Pedestal

REACTION LOADS BETWEEN HANDLING FRAME AND SEAFASTENING
FRAME

Figure 17 –Frame to Handling Frame connection and BEAM LOCAL AXIS

TAKE OFF REPORT

Handling Frame

Resting Frame

Page 52 of 57

APPENDIX F STRUCTURAL FABRICATION DRAWINGS

Drawing Number Drawing Title
078268C‐000‐DW‐5811‐0300 GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME SEAFASTENING DECK LAYOUT
BASE RESTING FRAME GENERAL ARRANGEMENT TITLE SHEET AND
078268C‐000‐DW‐5811‐0301
GENERAL NOTES
078268C‐000‐DW‐5811‐0302 BASE RESTING FRAME DETAIL DRAWING
078268C‐000‐DW‐5811‐0303 BASE RESTING FRAME DETAIL DRAWING
GOOSENECK FRAME BOTTOM PLATE ANGLE STOPPER DETAIL
078268C‐000‐DW‐5811‐0304
DRAWING

Note: For all drawings listed above, the latest revision shall be referred for fabrication. The drawings /
sketches presented in this memo are for reference purpose only, to aid review of calculations. Drawing
extracted from memo shall not be used for fabrication.

GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME SEAFASTENING SEAFASTENING BILL OF MATERIALS BILL OF MATERIALS
DIMENSIONS (m) UNITWT. TOTAL WT.
ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL REMARKS S.NO. QTY DESCRIPTION
21.25" (L x B x H) (Te) (Te)
[540mm] A 12 CLEAT TYPE 1, 1/2" THK. PLATE ASTM A572 Gr.50 ITEM: 1 1 1 BASE RESTING FRAME 3.91 x 4.24 x 4.02 3.65 3.65
11.81"
NOTES: [300mm]
1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET [METER] U.N.O. BILL OF MATERIAL ABOVE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.
3. ALL WELDS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TechnipFMC STRUCTURAL WELDING
SPECIFICATION : 000000-000-JSS-3615-0004. LEGEND
4. REMOVE ALL BURRS, SHARP EDGES AND WELD SPATTER.
[380mm]
5. GENERAL FABRICATION TOLERANCES: LINER± 0.08" ANGULAR ± 1°
14.95"
5/16 - CLEAT (ITEM A )
6. N.D.T. INSPECTION: ALL WELDS 100% MPI. 5/16
TYP.
7. GRIND DECK / PLATE SURFACE BEFORE WELDING SEAFASTENING EQUIPMENTS.
[205mm]
[200mm]
8.07"
7.87"
8. CLEAT PLACEMENT LOCATION ON EQUIPMENT MAY BE MODIFIED SLIGHTLY ON SITE AS LONG AS THE NUMBER OF
CLEATS TO BE WELDED ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATION (MINIMUM OF TWO PER SIDE).
9. TO REDUCE POINT LOAD, WOOD SHIMS MAY BE USED WHEREVER REQUIRED.
4.13" 17.12"
[105mm] [435mm]
CLEAT - ITEM A
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 7 1/2" 5'-0 1/2" 3'-7" 4'-1 1/2"
[0.19m] TYP. [1.53m] TYP. [1.09m] TYP. [1.26m] TYP.
A x 12
[1.27m]
4'-2"
1
[1.17m]
3'-10"
[1.17m]
3'-10"
109'-11"
[33.51m]
13'-11"
[4.24m] 40 45
[1.27m]
4'-2"
PORT SIDE
FAN ROOM
DN
STAIR
CRANE BUNKER STATION PILOT
REST UP LADDER
/STORE
DN
SW
L
A
-
DETAIL 01
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
[13.13m]
43'-1"
FLUSH
HATCH
HYD.
HATCH
1000MM
FORWARD SIDE
1
[3.91m]
12'-10"
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
FLUSH
HATCH
HYD. VENT
A
HATCH
1000MM DN
UP
SWL
DECK
STAIR
BUNKER STATION
DN FAN ROOM
STAR BOARD SIDE

SEE DETAIL 01
PLAN VIEW VIEW A ISOMETRIC VIEW
SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
REFERENCE:
SHELL PERDIDO PHASE II
1. GOOSE NECK RESTING FRAME : 078268C-000-DW-XXXX-0005
GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME

SEAFASTENING DECK LAYOUT
DRAWN CHECKED ENGINEER SCALE CLIENT TF DRAWING NUMBER
REV.
APPROVAL
This document and all information herein is confidential, and may not be used, reproduced or distributed
MSR - - AS NOTED 078268C-000-DW-5811-0300
CONFIDENTIALITY
A 22-MAY-2020 MSR ISSUED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW RPA/MWI MDG/KNL FSI DATE DATE DATE SHEET
without prior authorization of Technip USA, Inc. Technip USA, Inc. disclaims any and all liabilities for any CATEGORY: DRAWING NUMBER
A
changes or modifications to this document which are made by any non-Technip party. CONFIDENTIAL REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHKD ENG APRVD 22-MAY-2020 - - 1 OF 1
PLOT: 5/22/2020 9:52 AM LAST SAVE: 5/22/2020 9:51 AM BY: SMOHAMMEDY FILE NAME: C:\SIDDIQ - 7380\00 - AUTOCAD\01 - MY PROJECTS\00 - STRUCTURE\07 - SHELL PERDIDO\DRAWINGS\078268C-000-DW-5811-0300.DWG TECHNIP USA, INC. TBPE FIRM REG. NO. F-3030
TUSA No: DRAWING TITLE: GENERAL NOTES FOR STRUCTURAL FABRICATION
078268C-000-DW-5880-0301 GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME TITLE SHEET AND GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL STEELWORK INCLUDING WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT FABRICATION SPEC. SU.85.00.21 GFS.
078268C-000-DW-5880-0302 GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME SECTIONS AND DETAIL DRAWING 2. ALL STRUCTURAL WELDING AND NDE (INCLUDING VISUAL INSPECTION) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT FABRICATION SPEC. SU.85.00.21 GFS.
078268C-000-DW-5880-0303 GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME ITEM DETAIL DRAWING
3. FABRICATION TOLERANCES TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT FABRICATION SPEC. SU.85.00.21 GFS.
078268C-000-DW-5880-0304 GOOSE NECK FRAME BOTTOM PLATE ANGLE STOPPER DETAIL DRAWING
4. A SINGLE COAT OF PRIMER NEED TO BE PAINTED TO AVOID RUST FORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT FABRICATION.
078268C-000-DW-5811-0300 GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME SEAFASTENING DECK LAYOUT
5. ALL WELDS TO BE FULL PENETRATION U.N.O. How much clearance
do we have either
side of the cradle on
the trunnion?
6. WELD TESTING TO BE AS PER NDE SPEC AWS D1.1.
Do we have an
overall GA with the
7. REMOVE ALL BURRS, SHARP EDGES, AND WELD SPATTER. handing frame on
the resting frame.
this will be required
8. ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN IN BILL OF MATERIAL ARE FOR ONE (1) GOOSE NECK BASE RESTING FRAME U.N.O. however not urgent
now if you can
confirm the
clearance either
side.
ABBREVIATIONS:
C.O.G. - CENTER OF GRAVITY
W.P - WORK POINT
NTS - NOT TO SCALE
OPP - OPPOSITE
U.N.O. - UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
ISOMETRIC VIEW

TITLE SHEET AND GENERAL NOTES
DRAWN CHECKED ENGINEER SCALE CLIENT APPROVAL TF DRAWING NUMBER REV
This document and all information herein is confidential, and may not be used, reproduced or distributed CONFIDENTIALITY MPP AS NOTED 078268C-000-DW-5880-0301
without prior authorization of Technip USA, Inc. Technip USA, Inc. disclaims any and all liabilities for any CATEGORY: A 21 MAY 2020 MPP ISSUED FOR REVIEW RPA/MWI MDG/KNL FSI DATE DATE DATE SHEET DRAWING NUMBER
changes or modifications to this document which are made by any non-Technip party. CONFIDENTIAL REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHKD ENG APRVD 21 MAY 2020 1 OF 1 A
Last Saved: 5/21/2020 10:31:17 By: mpeeterselestin File Name: C:\Vault\SURF\CAD\Perdido Phase 2\Base Resting frame\Drawing\078268C-000-DW-5880-0301.idw TECHNIP USA, INC. TBPE FIRM REG. NO. F-3030
BILL OF MATERIAL
4" [101.6 mm] TYP ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL REMARKS
A
SHS 8 x 1/2
-
SHS 8 x 1/2 1 2 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
1 SHS 8 x 1/2 2 3 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
12'-2" [3708.4 mm] SHS 8 x 1/2
- 3 1 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
4 2 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
11 TYP 5 2 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
11
6 1 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
7 2 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
2 2 OPP.
TYP 4" [101.6 mm] 8 1 SHS 8 x 1/2 ASTM A500
- - 9 2 BEND PLATE -1 , 1/2" THK. ASTM A36
Somewhere 10 4 CAP PLATE, 1/2" THK. ASTM A36
W.P SHS 8 x 1/2
around this TYPICAL WELD DETAIL 11 2 BEND PLATE -2 , 1/2" THK. ASTM A36
location may be
better for lifting
13 TYPICAL WELD DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 12 4 DOUBLER PLATE , 1/2" THK. ASTM A36
Why is this lift mm] SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 13 4 HR-1000CT HEAVY LIFT SWIVEL HOIST RING (BOLT -- STOCK NO-6608139
and lashing.
5 11/16" [144.5 mm]

point here rather 54.6 11 SIZE 7/8" - 9 x 3) WLL 6200 lbs
50
1'-0" [304.8 mm]

1'-0 3/16" [309.5 mm] =10 3/4" [273.1 mm]=
H
8 5 15/16" [151.1 mm]
-
than higher up on 7"[ APPROXIMATE WEIGHT ( BASE RESTING FRAME) = 8097.26 Lbs ( 3672.23 kgs)
'- TYP 2
the diagonal as 16 12 BILL OF MATERIAL ABOVE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE USED AS A CUTTING LIST.
1 3/8" [35.0 mm]

2
35.7
this would be
better for lifting W.P
13'-0 1/4" [3969.4 mm]

position and 1/2" [12.7 mm]
12'-7 7/16" [3846.6 mm]

6 5 90
11 TYP
lashing for 1'-7 5/16" [490.5 mm] 11
10'-8 15/16" [3275.7 mm]
10'-9" [3276.6 mm]

9'-9" [2971.8 mm]
seafastening.
5
mm]
TYP 5
32.5 14
'-1 5 2
11
[46 COG 3/1 11
3/8" 6"
15
'-2
[45
67
.8
DETAIL 1 VIEW H
11 3/4" [298.5 mm] mm SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
] - - 12
7
3'-9 3/8" [1152.2 mm]
5
12 TYP 5
3/8 2 6
Please provide
COG
1'-3 9/16" [395.3 mm] 13 13

3'-11 7/16" [1205.6 mm] W.P clearance to
5 3/4" [145.4 mm] 1
COG 2 the trunnion as
10
45
we may want to 13
B 9
increase
- opening size. 5
9
1'-0" [304.8 mm]

10 7
4 SEAL WELD 10 2
10 1 8
C 1 3/16 TYP 1 4
- 11'-6" [3505.2 mm]
1'-5 7/16" [443.0 mm] 13 12 5
1'-1 1/8" [333.8 mm] 11'-8 11/16" [3574.1 mm] 1'-1 1/8" [333.8 mm]
DETAIL 3 10
3
E
VIEW
-
13'-11" [4241.8 mm] A SCALE: 1"=1'-0" -
1 NO. AS SHOWN 7
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" - 1 NO. OPP. HAND
ELEVATION VIEW =10 15/16" [277.3 mm]= 1/2" [12.7 mm] 2
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" TYP
2 11/16" [67.7 mm] 9
9
90 10 4 12 13 1
7 3/4" [196.9 mm]
1'-1 1/8" [333.8 mm]

1'-1 5/16" [338.9 mm] 12'-8 7/16" [3871.1 mm] 4 3/8 4 2
5
12
45
7 13 12
4 10 7
ISOMETRIC VIEW
10 1
6 3/4" [171.6 mm]
10
4" [101.6 mm]

E 1/4" [6.4 mm] W.P
W.P 1 12 13
- 2" [50.9 mm] 1
W.P 6 1/16" [154.8 mm]
5 SEAL WELD
3/16
6'-1" [1854.2 mm]
11 3/4" [298.5 mm]

COG
1 5/8" [40.8 mm] 1'-1 1/8" [333.8 mm] 1'-5 7/16" [443.0 mm]
3'-11 7/16" [1205.6 mm] TYP 17 2
'-7
COG
11 3/4" [298.1 mm]
1/1
6" VIEW D SECTION E
[53 SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1"=1'-0" - -
10'-10 1/2" [3314.7 mm]
60
3 .8
12'-2" [3708.4 mm]
12'-2" [3708.4 mm]
mm (OTHER PARTS NOT

COG ] SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
8 7
G
15 2
-
2 '-1
11
5/1
6" 2 =10 15/16" [277.3 mm]= m] 1/2" [12.7 mm]
[48 m 8
74
.6 85.4 TYP
9 [2
6'-2 9/16" [1893.6 mm]
mm 2 11/16" [67.7 mm] 9

] /1 4"
6
47.1 11
90
4
COG
45
4 12 2 12 13
4
4" [101.6 mm]
7
43.7
7 1 2" [50.9 mm] 5
W.P
10
6 3/4" [171.6 mm] 10
1/4" [6.4 mm] 10 1/16" [256.4 mm]

7 3/4" [196.9 mm]
D SEAL WELD 11 3/4" [298.5 mm] 1 1

3/16
- 13 12 5 10 7 W.P
11'-8 11/16" [3574.1 mm] 3/8
1'-1 5/16" [338.3 mm] 1'-1 1/8" [333.8 mm] 1'-5 7/16" [443.0 mm]
SECTION B SECTION C SECTION F SECTION G

SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" - SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1"=1'-0" - -
(OTHER PARTS NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
NOTES:
1.DRAWING NUMBERS REFERENCED ARE TECHNIPFMC NUMBERS. SHELL PERDIDO PHASE II
2.REFERENCE DWG.078268C-000-DW-5880-0301 FOR COMPLETE DRAWING LIST AND GENERAL NOTES.
3.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND INCHES U.N.O.
SECTIONS AND DETAIL DRAWING
13'-11" [4241.8 mm]
14'-7 3/4" [4463.7 mm]
11'-6" [3505.2 mm] 15'-8 7/16" [4785.9 mm]
H
-
5 3/4" [146.1 mm]
4" [101.6 mm]

7 7/16" [188.5 mm] CUT
2'-6 9/16" [776.8 mm]
CUT
7/8-9 UNC - 2B
7/8-9 UNC - 2B THRU HOLE
THRU HOLE FOR ITEM-13 7 7/16" [188.5 mm]
5 3/4" [146.1 mm]
FOR ITEM-13 CUT
SEE NOTE -3
SEE NOTE -3
ITEM 2 ITEM 3 CUT
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
SECTION H SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
ITEM 1 SCALE: 1"=1'-0" ITEM 6
SCALE: 1"=1'-0" -
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
17'-3 13/16" [5279.2 mm]
6 3/4" [171.6 mm]

1 3/8" [35.0 mm]
1 3/8" [35.0 mm] 90
14'-11 1/16" [4548.4 mm] 90
8 3/8" [212.1 mm]
CUT
R1 1/2" [R38.1 mm]
R1 1/2" [R38.1 mm]

8" [203.2 mm] 8 3/8" [212.1 mm]
8" [203.2 mm]
ITEM 7 CUT ITEM 8
CUT
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
CUT
SCALE: 1"=1'-0" ITEM 4
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
H
12'-3 7/16" [3745.0 mm]
12'-2 1/16" [3710.0 mm]

-
7/8-9 UNC - 2B
THRU HOLE
9" [228.6 mm] FOR ITEM-13
9'-11 1/4" [3029.6 mm]

7 1/2" [190.5 mm] SEE NOTE -3
R3/4" [R19.1 mm] =5" [127.0 mm]=
TYP
8 1/4" [208.8 mm]
7 1/2" [190.5 mm]
R1" [R25.4 mm]
=5" [127.0 mm]=

7/8-9 UNC - 2B
8 1/4" [208.8 mm] THRU HOLE
FOR ITEM-13
ITEM 9 ITEM 10 ITEM 12 ITEM 5

SCALE: 2"=1'-0" SCALE: 2"=1'-0" SCALE: 2"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
10 3/4" [273.1 mm] 45.0 9" [228.6 mm]

0
2 3/16" [56.1 mm]
R1 1/2" [R38.1 mm]

9 3/16" [233.4 mm]
1'-1 9/16" [344.5 mm]
7" [177.3 mm]

1'-3 1/16" [382.6 mm]
1'-3 1/16" [382.6 mm]
90
1" [25.4 mm]
R1" [R25.4 mm]

TYP
ITEM 11
SCALE: 2"=1'-0"
NOTES:
1.DRAWING NUMBERS REFERENCED ARE TECHNIPFMC NUMBERS. SHELL PERDIDO PHASE II
3.HOLES SHOULD BE DRILLED OUT SIDE OF THE FRAME FOR SWIVEL HOIST.
ITEM DETAIL DRAWING
BILL OF MATERIAL
ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL REMARKS
1 1 PL.1/2" THK ASTM A36
2 1 PL.1/2" THK ASTM A36
3 2 STIFFENER PL.1/2" THK ASTM A36
APPROXIMATE WEIGHT (GOOSENECK FRAME BOTTOM PLATE ANGLE STOPPER) = 100.71 LBS (45.67 Kgs)
2'-0" [609.6] BILL OF MATERIAL ABOVE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE USED AS A CUTTING LIST
1 1/2" [38.1] 7" [177.8] 7" [177.8] 7" [177.8] 1 1/2" [38.1]
4" [101.6]
3" [76.2]
1'-0" [304.8]
3" [76.2]
PLAN VIEW 10 x 15/32" [ 12.0] HOLES
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" FOR M10 ASTM A193 B7M BOLTS
1
10" [254.0] 1/2" [12.7]
5" [127.0] 1'-2" [355.6]

2" [50.8]
1
3
3/8
TYP
1'-0 1/2" [317.5]

1'-0" [304.8]
1'-0" [304.8]
2x 1/2" STIFFENER 3/8 3
PLATE
10" [254.0]
2" [50.8]
3/8
0 1/2" [12.7]
3 2
3
1'-0" [304.8]
ELEVATION SIDE VIEW

SCALE: 3"=1'-0" SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
ISOMETRIC VIEW
NOTES:
1.DRAWING NUMBERS REFERENCED ARE TECHNIPFMC NUMBERS.
3.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND INCHES U.N.O.
GOOSENECK FRAME
BOTTOM PLATE ANGLE STOPPER
DETAIL DRAWING

Sea Fastening PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sea Fastening PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sea Fastening PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the objective of the structural assessment?

What is the objective of the structural assessment?

What design methodology is used?

What design methodology is used?

GEC CHENNAI

A 22‐May‐2020 Issued for Review MDG NPR / KNL FSI

Rev. Date Revision Description Issued by Reviewed by Approved by

Cargo overall dimensions:

Cargo Mass M 3.6 Te

Transit region World-wide

Planned operation period TPOP 0 days Design Loads at CoG

Cleats and Corner Loads

Fixity_3 Brackets - hooked over lower flange of seafastened item

Bracket geometric properties

Cargo geometric properties

Deck details for under deck checks

Weld details (leg length)

Design method (Choice applies to all brackets)

TC created by: JMcE

TC created by: JMcE

Material Allowable Stresses

Above deck DNV WSD (DNV-OS-C102)

Below deck DNV Rules for Ships WSD method

Maximum permissible stresses

Bracket and Welds Strength Checks

Base (Section 5-5)

Under deck (Section 5-5)

TC created by: JMcE

Bearing btw item flange and bracket

Plate section 1-1 (at cargo) 0.41

Bracket Buckling Strength

TC created by: JMcE

Column length (Lcol) 741 mm

Allowable stress red fact (Qs) 0.65

TC created by: JMcE

1.0 ANGLE PLATE STOPPER DESIGN:

1.1 Material Properities:

Minimum Yield Strength of Deck (assumed) Fyd  34 ksi

Ultimate Tensile Strength of Welds Fexx  70 ksi

1.2 Allowable Stress:

1.3 Force on angle shear stopper:

Loads from Appendix D, Figure 17

FAS  103.14kN ( Max load)

1.4 Shear Stopper Geometry:

Length of section L1  12 in L2  24 in

Thickness of section Pthk  0.5in

Height of section L3  12in

Weld size w1  0.375  in w2  0.375in

Fillet throat thickness Th weld  w1  cos( 45deg)

2.0 ANGLE STOPPER DESIGN CHECK:

Unity Check V_shear

2.2 Bending on Shear Stopper:

2.3 Shear Stopper Welds:

Inplane moment BMinp  139.12 kip  in

Shear force per linear inch FAS kip

Resultant force per Linear inch 2 2 kip

Unity check Wss

3.0 BOLT DESIGN CHECK:

Bolt material type : ASTM A193 B7