Consensual Contract - Reaction Paper 1 ACC 312 (5006)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Altaya, Alyssa Paula C.

ACC 312 (5006)

CONSENSUAL CONTRACT

(Reaction Paper)

The first clip (John Wick 1) pertains no perfection of contract of sale in which there is
no consensus between the owner of the Mustang Car and the person who is willing to buy
that car. Accordingly, consent is an essential requisite of a contract of sale being perfected
by mere consent and meeting of minds in binding a thing as an object with a vendor willing
to sell and a vendee willing to buy upon the agreed price equivalently as to consent on the
part of the seller to transfer and deliver and the buy willing to pay. On the other hand, the
second clip inculcate that the contract of sale is voidable since it shows threats and
intimidation (the buyer threatens the seller with a gun forcing him to sell those crabs) that
clearly defected the contract. It was saddening for the fact that the other man wanted to do
was to run honest business but the buyer was a greedy and selfish thug looking in on the
deed.

The video presented an illustrative point in differentiating the forms of unperfected


contract of sale that makes it easier to determine of how a consensual contract is ought to
be. You can’t force someone to sell their things especially if it is not intended for sale and
which are not proposed to sell just for you. It happens that we have a law that depicts the
importance of “consent” between the seller and the buyer to be in good faith and is
essential for the existence of a contract. In addition, these videos are headlock in learning
law on sale in which it displays a clearer view of having consensus that is vitiated by error;
freedom by violence, intimidation or undue influence; and spontaneity by fraud. Thus, a
contract where consent is given through mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence or
fraud is voidable. Thus, the videos are great help for me to understand and come up with a
conclusion wherein the contract of sale is not valid so long as the consents of both parties
are not intelligent, free and spontaneous.

You might also like