Doctrine of Colourable Legislation Part 3

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

INTRODUCTION:-

Doctrine of Colorable Legislation like any other constitutional law is a tool devised and applied
by the Supreme Court of India to interpret various constitutional provisions. It is a guiding
principle of immense utility while construing provisions relating to legislative competence.

Before knowing what this doctrine is and how it is applied in India, let us first understand the
genesis of Doctrine of Colorable Legislation.

Doctrine of Colorable Legislation is built upon the founding stones of the Doctrine
of Separation of Power. Separation of Power mandates that a balance of power is to be struck
between the different components of the State i.e. between the Legislature, the Executive and the
Judiciary. The primary function of the legislature is to make laws. Whenever Legislature tries to
shift this balance of power towards itself then the Doctrine of Colorable Legislation is attracted
to take care of Legislative Accountability.
The literal meaning of Colorable Legislation is that under the ‘colour’ or ‘guise’ of the power
conferred for one particular purpose, the legislature cannot seek to achieve some other purpose
which it is otherwise not competent to legislate on.

COLOURABLE LEGISLATION IN INDIA:-

 In India ‘Doctrine of Colorable Legislation’ signifies only a limitation of the law-making


power of the legislature. It comes to know while the legislature purporting to act within its power
but in reality, it has transgressed those powers.
 The doctrine of Colorable Legislation becomes applicable whenever legislation seeks to
do in an indirect manner what it cannot do directly.
 In India, legislative powers of parliament and the state legislatures are conferred
by Article 246 and distributed by List I, II, and III, in the seventh schedule of the Indian
Constitution. The parliament have the power to make laws respect to any of the matters of the
List II and the parliament and the state legislatures both have the power to make laws with
respect to any of the matters of the List III and the residuary power of legislation is vested in the
Parliament by virtue of Article 248, and List I.
 For making any law or of that law’s validity legislative competency is an issue that
relates to how legislative powers must be shared between the centre and the state or it focuses
only on the relationships between both of them. The main point is that the legislature having
restrictive power cannot step over the field of competency. It is termed as the “fraud on the
Constitution”.
 The whole Doctrine is based upon the maxim that “you cannot do what you cannot do
directly”. “Colorable legislation” is thus bound up with incompetency and not tainted with bad
faith or evil motive. A thing is colorable which in appearance only and not only in reality, what it
purports to be.
 The Supreme Court of India in different judicial pronouncement has laid down the certain
tests in order to determine the true nature of the legislation impeached as colorable:-
 The court must look to the substance of the impugned law, as distinguished from its form
or the label which the legislature has given it. For the purpose of determining the substance of
the impugned law, the court will examine two things, i.e. effect of the legislature and the object
and purpose of the act.
 The Doctrine of Colorable Legislation has nothing to do with the motive of the
legislation, it is in the essence a question of vires or power of the legislature to enact the law in
question.
 The doctrine does not involve any question of bona fides or mala fides intention on the
part of legislature. If the legislature is competent enough to enact a particular law, then whatever
motive which impelled it to act are irrelevant.

LIMITATIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF DOCTRINE OF COLORABLE


LEGISLATION:-

 The Doctrine has no application where the powers of a legislature are not fettered by any
Constitutional limitation.
 The Doctrine is also not applicable to Subordinate Legislation.
 The Doctrine does not involve any question of bona fides or mala fides on the part of the
legislature. The whole doctrine revolves itself into the, question of competency of a particular
legislature to enact a particular law.
 A logical corollary of the above-mentioned point is that the legislature does not act
on Extraneous Considerations. There are always a presumption of constitutionality in favor of
the statute. The principle of presumption of constitutionality was succinctly enunciated by
constitutional bench in Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S.R. Tendolkar and Ors.
 When a legislature has the power to make law with respect to a particular subject, it also
has all the ancillary and incidental power to make that law an effective one.
 The transgression of constitutional power by legislature may be patent, manifest or direct,
but may also disguised, covert and indirect and it is only to this latter class of cases that the
expression “colorable Legislation” is being applied.

You might also like