t138 PDF
t138 PDF
t138 PDF
ABSTRACT
The performance of pavements depends to a large extent on the strength and stiffness of the subgrades. This
paper presents the results of an extensive field and laboratory investigation of fourteen low volume road sections
in the state of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) tests, California Bearing Ratio
(CBR) tests, Field Dry Density (FDD) and Field Moisture Content (FMC) tests were performed to study the
strength properties of the subgrade layer of pavements. The work described herein focuses on exploring the
correlations between the results obtained using the DCP and the results obtained using the CBR method for
subgrade soils at various locations of Northern Districts of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, India. A correlation
between the modified structural number (MSN) of subgrade and DCP penetration index and CBR values were also
established. Regression models were developed as part of this study to enable the prediction of CBR values based
on the average penetration-rates of DCPs performed for field density and field-moisture content.
to be identified and the thickness and strength of each to the CBR of the entire subgrade, rather than any layers into
be determined. These layers are then grouped together into which the subgrade can be divided. A procedure to identify
the pavement layers of base, sub-base and subgrade, guided the layers which have the greatest influence within the
by test pit or as-built records if available. The strengths of subgrade and derive the aggregate subgrade CBR in a
all layers can then be combined into a Structural Number manner which reflects engineering judgement has therefore
for each pavement layer and the entire pavement structure. been devised and is included in UK DCP 3.1. The
The subgrade layer boundaries of all the road sections are
relationship between subgrade CBR and SNG is as follows
shown below in Figure 2.
(Eq. 1).
SNG (or MSN) = 3.51 Log10 (CBR) - 0.85 Log10 (CBR) 2 − 1.43
(1) MSN was calculated for all the road sections with the
help of the UK DCP 3.1 software. MSN values are given in
Table 2.
Table 2: Subgrade Strength Properties
S. Name of DCP CBR Modified
No. Road (mm/blow) (%) Structural
Sections Number (MSN)
1 Kaido 2.49 7.39 2.08
2 Galhotha 13.96 1.03 1.18
3 Harrakhed 8.71 3.78 1.74
4 Roopri 22.3 0.41 0.79
5 Shahpur 7 4.41 1.57
6 Gulaoti 23.37 0.7 1.17
Fig. 2: Subgrade Layer Boundaries of Section 1- 14 7 DK By Pass 12.28 1.56 1.6
The strengths of Test layers are calculated by 8 Haridwar 16.175 0.62 1.42
converting the penetration rate (mm per blow) to a 9 Dehradun 3.075 6.54 2.08
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value and then from the 10 Hat Hat 9.13 2.12 1.65
CBR value to a strength coefficient and finally to a 11 Nazarpur 9.04 3.51 1.82
Structural Number. The default is the TRL relationship for Ronda
a 60° cone. 12 Dhunayya 4.98 5.87 2.03
13 Sitarganj 3.12 6.87 2.08
Many different characteristics can be measured for
14 Ramnagar 4.29 5.91 2.08
subgrade layer: thickness, modulus, CBR and so on. These
values can be combined in many different ways. The concept 5. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
of a Structural Number (SN) was developed during the
AASHO Road Test research as a single number which DCP – CBR Relationship
would indicate the strength and durability of an entire The relationship developed between field DCP value and
pavement and which would be internationally recognised. the laboratory CBR (field condition) obtained from the study
The concept was developed for the analysis of flexible is given in Eq. (2). The relationship is plotted in Figure 3.
pavements; rigid pavements are not analysed using
Structural Numbers. Over time, the concept has expanded. CBR = 35.476 (DCP)-1.28 (2)
The original term, SN, was calculated from the imported R2 = 0.8817
surface, base and sub-base layers. The modified Structural Many relationships have been developed to estimate
Number (MSN) was then introduced to include the effect the CBR value from the DCP penetration index. Some of
of the subgrade. However, it was realised that because the them are listed in Table 3.
subgrade contribution to MSN is independent of its depth,
redefining subgrade material as sub-base gives a higher Table 3: CBR - DCP Relationships by Different Researchers
MSN. Tests were carried out and the adjusted Structural S. Name of Relationship
Number (SNP) was developed. This adjusts the contribution No. Researcher
of the sub-base and subgrade according to their depth and 1 Kleyn (1975) Log (CBR) = 2.62 - 1.27 Log (DCP)
eliminates this potential source of error. 2 Livneh Log (CBR) = 2.56 - 1.16 Log (DCP)
The contribution of the Subgrade to the Structural (1987)
3 Harrison Log (CBR) = 2.55 - 1.14 Log (DCP)
Number of a pavement is referred to as SNG (same as MSN)
(1987)
and is calculated directly from CBR without the need for 4 Sahoo et al. CBR = 67.687 (DCP)-1.1029
an intermediate strength coefficient. SNG is a function of (2009)
1022 A. Gupta, P. Kumar and R. Rastogi