00001

View Online
Published on 01 January 2002 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781847551009-00001
Chapter 1
Principles and Concepts of Green

Chemistry
Downloaded by zz557 on 16 September 2010
1.1 INTRODUCTION
During the twentieth century chemistry changed for ever the way we live.
Perhaps the greatest perceived benefits, to the general public, have come
from the pharmaceuticals industry with developments of painkillers, anti-
biotics, heart drugs and, more recently, Viagra. However, it is difficult to
think of an important facet of modern life which has not been transformed
by products of the chemical and related industries, for example:
Transportation - production of gasoline and diesel fiom petroleum,

fuel additives for greater efficiency and reduced emissions, catalytic
converters, plastics to reduce vehicle weight and improve energy
efficiency.
Clothing - man-made fibres such as rayon and nylon, dyes, water-
proofing and other surface finishing chemicals.
Sport - advanced composite materials for tennis and squash rackets,
all-weather surfaces.
Safety - lightweight polycarbonate cycle helmets, fire-retardant
furniture.
Food - refrigerants, packaging, containers and wraps, food processing
aids, preservatives.
Medical - artificial joints, ‘blood bags’, anaesthetics, disinfectants,
anti-cancer drugs, vaccines, dental fillings, contact lenses, contra-
ceptives.
Office - photocopying toner, inks, printed circuit boards, liquid-
crystal displays.
Home - material and dyes for carpets, plastics for TVs and mobile
phones, CDs, video and audio tapes, paints, detergents.
Farming - fertilizers, pesticides.
1
View Online
2 Chapter 1
500
3
g 400 -j
.-
300 I
g! 200
%
-
%t 100 ’
0 : I 1
UK EU USA Japan
Figure 1.1 Chemical industry turnover
The value of the chemical industry is shown in Figure 1.1. In the UK

over 450000 people are employed by the industry (including pharmaceu-

ticals and plastics) and the industry is manufacturing’s number one
exporter.
In many countries, however, the chemical industry is often viewed, by
the general public, as causing more harm than good. There are several
reasons for this, including general ignorance of the end use and value of
the industry’s products; however, a major reason is that the industry is
perceived as being polluting and causing significant environmental
damage. There is a certain amount of truth in this view with well-
publicized disasters such as Bhopal causing both environmental damage
and loss of life. As well as specific disasters, general pollution which came
to the public’s attention in the 1960s and 70s through eutrophication,
foaming rivers, the discovery of persistent organic pollutants and the
famous ‘burning’ Cuyahoga river, have all played a part in formulating
this view of the chemical industry.
Chemists and engineers engaged in development of chemical products
and processes have never set out to cause damage to the environment or
human health. These have occurred largely through a lack of knowledge,
especially of the longer-term effects of products entering the environment
and possibly an over-reliance on procedures to ensure operations are
carried out safely. The challenge for the chemical industry in the twenty-
first century is to continue to provide the benefits we have come to rely on,
in an economically viable manner, but without the adverse environmental
side effects.
1.2 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN

CHEMISTRY
Current thinking on sustainable development came out of a United Nations
Commission on Environment and Development in 1987 (Bruntland
View Online
Principles and Concepts of Green Chemistry 3
Commission), which defined sustainable development as: ‘. . . meeting the

needs of the present without compromising the ability of future genera-
tions to meet their own needs.’ Although the ideals on which sustainable
development is based are not new, indeed Thomas Jefferson made similar
comments in 1789, the Bruntland Commission did catalyse the sustain-

ability debate. Since 1987 Governments, NGOs, society in general and
industry sectors have considered what sustainable development really
means and how best to start to achieve it from their own standpoint. Issues
that will have a significant impact on how the move towards sustainability
is approached, include time-scale, likely future technology developments
and population forecasts. Two of the key aspects of sustainable develop-
ment from a chemicals and energy perspective are: ‘how fast should we
use up fossil fuels?’ and ‘how much “waste” or pollution can we safely
release to the environment?’ Whilst there are no agreed answers to these
questions there is general agreement to develop more renewable forms of
energy and to reduce pollution.
The Natural Step, an international movement, started in Sweden,
dedicated to helping society reduce its impact on the environment has
developed four system conditions for sustainability:
Materials from the Earth’s crust (e.g. heavy metals) must not system-
atically increase in nature.
Persistent substances produced by society (e.g. DDT, CFCs) must not
systematically increase.
The physical basis for the Earth’s productive natural cycles must not
be systematically deteriorated.
There must be fair and efficient use of resources with respect to
meeting human needs.
This approach recognizes that the Earth does have a natural capacity for
dealing with much of the waste and pollution which society generates; it is
only when that capacity is exceeded that our lifestyle becomes unsustain-
able.
During the early 1990s the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
coined the phrase Green Chemistry ‘To promote innovative chemical
technologies that reduce or eliminate the use or generation of hazardous
substances in the design, manufacture and use of chemical products.’ Over
the last 10 years Green Chemistry has gradually become recognized as
both a culture and a methodology for achieving sustainability. The 12
Principles of Green Chemistry (Box 1.1) help show how this can be
achieved. Many of these 12 principles, e.g. catalysis and increased use of
renewable resources, are expanded on in later chapters. When looking at
View Online
4 Chapter 1
Green Chemistry from an industrial perspective it is important to take the

costs of implementing green technology into account; from this point of
view it is helphl to look at Green Chemistry as a reduction process
(Figure 1.2). From this perspective it becomes obvious that through
application of Green Chemistry concepts significant savings can be made,

arising from reduced raw material use, lower capital expenditure, lower
costs of waste treatment and disposal, etc. The fundamental challenge for
the chemical industry is to continue to provide the benefits to society
without overburdening or causing damage to the environment, and all this
must be done at an acceptable cost.
Figure 1.2 Green chemistry as a reduction process
Box 1.1 The 12 Principles of Green Chemistry

(Reproduced with permission from P.C. Anastas and J.C. Warner ‘Green
Chemistry Theory and Practice’, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998)
continued on p . 5
View Online
Box 1.1 continued

1. Prevention
It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it has been
created.
2. Atom Economy
Synthetic methods should be designed to maximize the incorporation of all
materials used in the process into the final product.
3. Less Hazardous Chemical Synthesis

Wherever practicable, synthetic methods should be designed to use and gen-
erate substances that possess little or no toxicity to people or the environment.
4. Designing Safer Chemicals

Chemical products should be designed to effect their desired function while
minimizing their toxicity.
5. Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries

The use of auxiliary substances (e.g., solvents or separation agents) should be
made unnecessary whenever possible and innocuous when used.
6. Design for Energy Efficiency

Energy requirements of chemical processes should be recognised for their
environmental and economic impacts and should be minimized. If possible,
synthetic methods should be conducted at ambient temperature and pressure.
7. Use of Renewable Feedstocks

A raw material or feedstock should be renewable rather than depleting
whenever technically and economically practicable.
8. Reduce Derivatives
Unnecessary derivatization (use of blocking groups, protectiodde-protection,
and temporary modification of physicalkhemical processes) should be mini-
mized or avoided if possible, because such steps require additional reagents
and can generate waste.
9. Catalysis
Catalytic reagents (as selective as possible) are superior to stoichiometric
reagents.
10. Design for Degradation

Chemical products should be designed so that at the end of their function they
continued on p. 6
View Online
6 Chapter 1
Box 1.1 continued

break down into innocuous degradation products and do not persist in the
environment.
11. Real-time Analysis for Pollution Prevention

Analytical methodologies need to be further developed to allow for real-time,
in-process monitoring and control prior to the formation of hazardous
substances.
12. Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention

Substances and the form of a substance used in a chemical process should be
chosen to minimize the potential for chemical accidents, including releases,
explosions, and fires.
1.3 ATOM ECONOMY

One of the fundamental and most important principles of Green Chemistry
is that of atom economy. This essentially is a measure of how many atoms
of reactants end up in the final product and how many end up in by-
products or waste. The percentage atom economy can be calculated as 100
times the relative molecular mass (RMM) of all atoms used to make
wanted product divided by the RMM of all reactants, Box 1.2. The real
benefit of atom economy is that it can be calculated at the reaction
planning stage from a balanced reaction equation. Taking the following
theoretical reaction:
X+Y=P+U (1.1)
the reaction between X and Y to give product P may proceed in 100%

yield with 100% selectivity but because the reaction also produces
unwanted materials U its atom economy will be less than 100%.
Box 1.2 Measures of Reaction Eficiency
actual quantity of products achieved

% yield = 100 X
theoretical quantity of products achievable
yield of desired product

% selectivity = 100 x
amount of substrate converted
continued on p . 7
View Online
Box 1.2 continued
% Atom Economy = 100 X

Relative molecular mass desired products
Relative molecular mass of all reactants
~~ -1
Traditionally chemists are taught to maximize the yield of a reaction.

Whilst this is a worthy goal and is an effective measure of the efficiency
of a particular reaction it is not a particularly good measure for comparing
efficiencies between different reactions. Taking two of the production
routes for maleic anhydride as an example (Scheme 1. l), it is evident that
the butene oxidation route is considerably more atom efficient and avoids
'wasting' two carbon atoms as C02. Comparison of the two routes is

interesting since both occur under similar reaction conditions of 400 "C in
the presence of a promoted vanadium pentoxide catalyst. Initial processes
were based on benzene but for a while butene oxidation became the
preferred route since it involved simpler separation technology.
Today most plants use butane as a feed stock because of the lower raw
material price. Whilst, at the design stage, the choice of butene over
benzene would appear obvious, the two routes do have differing selectiv-
ities, negating some of the atom economy benefits of the butene route.
0
Benzene oxidation //
'0
Formula weights
78 4 5 x 3 2 = 144 98
YOatom economy = 1OOx 981(78 + 144) = 100x98/222 = 44.1%
Butene oxidation 0
Formula weights
56 3 x 3 2 = 96 98
% atom economy = 1OOx 98/(56 + 96) = 1OOx 981152 = 64.5%
Scheme 1.1 Atom economy for maleic anhydride production routes

View Online
8 Chapter 1
Table 1.1 Some atom economic and atom un-economic reactions
Atom economic reactions Atom un-economic reactions
Rearrangement Substitution
Addition Elimination
Diels- Alder Wittig
Other concerted reactions Grignard
Using benzene typical selectivities of around 65% are obtained commer-

cially whilst for butene it is approximately 55%. If we multiply the
theoretical atom economies by these figures we obtain practical atom
economies of 28.7% for the benzene route and 35.6% for butene. This is a
useful illustration of how the atom economy concept is a valuable

additional tool in measuring overall reaction efficiency, and how good
atom economy can compensate for poorer yields or selectivities.
By taking the atom economy of various synthetic routes into account at
the planning stage the chosen strategy is likely to produce a greater weight
of products per unit weight of reactants than might otherwise have been
the case. There are, however, a number of common reaction types which
are inherently atom efficient and a number which are not (Table 1.1).
Although the reactions under the ‘Atom Economic’ heading are generally
atom efficient, each specific reaction should be considered individually
since, for example, unrecoverable ‘catalysts’ sometimes need to be used in
significant amounts. On the other hand some atom un-economic reactions
may involve, for example, elimination of water, which does not signifi-
cantly detract from the greenness.
1.4 ATOM ECONOMIC REACTIONS

1.4.1 Rearrangement Reactions
Rearrangements, especially those only involving heat or a small amount of
catalyst to activate the reaction, display total atom economy. A classic
example of this is the Claisen rearrangement, which involves the
rearrangement of aromatic ally1 ethers as shown in Scheme 1.2. Although
Scheme 1.2 Claisen rearrangement

View Online
ortho-substituted products usually predominate, some para-alkylated pro-

ducts are also formed, reducing overall yield. The reaction may however
be both high yielding and atom economic when di-ortho-substituted
aromatic ally1 ethers are used.
The Fries rearrangement of phenolic esters (Scheme 1.3) is normally

‘catalysed’ by stoichiometric amounts of a Lewis acid such as A1C13. The
requirement for this large amount of ‘catalyst’ is due to it complexing with
the product; work-up with water hydrolyses the complex producing
copious amounts of aluminium waste. This significantly reduces the atom
economy of the reaction as the A1Cl3 should be considered a reagent rather
than a catalyst since it is not recovered in a reusable form.
A useful solution to this problem is the photo Fries rearrangement. Here
UV light is used to generate RCOO. radicals and the reaction proceeds via
an intermolecular free radical route rather than through nucleophilic attack
as in the conventional process. The selectivity of these reactions may be
improved by imposing steric control through carrying out the reactions in
zeolite or cyclodextrin cages.
Another valuable rearrangement reaction that is usually ‘catalysed’ by
stoichiometric amounts of catalyst is the Beckmann rearrangement
(Scheme 1.4)- This reaction is used commercially for converting cyclohex-
anone oxime into caprolactam, a key intermediate for nylon 6; 20% oleum
is the usual catalyst. A wide range of heterogeneous catalysts have been
explored, which avoid the need for using oleum. In particular, certain
J
OAICI, OH RCO’
I I
COR COR
Scheme 1.3 Fries rearrangement
Scheme 1.4 Beckmann rearrangement

View Online
10 Chapter 1
zeolites, notably [B]-MFI, have been shown to give excellent yields (up to
94% in fluidized-bed reactors), and good stability and ease of regenera-
tion.
One other 100% atom economic rearrangement is worth mentioning
briefly. When vinylcyclopropanes are heated they readily undergo ring

expansion to cyclopentenes. The temperature required varies significantly,
depending on the molecule; for example 1-phenyl-2-vinylcyclopropane
may be converted to phenylcyclopentene in reasonable yield at 200 "C.
Many other versatile so-called rearrangements involve elimination of
water. Whilst this does reduce the atom economy these reactions are worth
considering when devizing a green synthesis. The pinacol rearrangement
of vic diols into aldehydes or ketones is catalysed by acids: frequently
sulfuric acid is used, but there are also many examples of supported acid
catalysts such as FeCl, on silica being used. The mechanism involves
protonation of one of the hydroxyl groups followed by loss of water, alkyl
migration to give the more stable carbocation and final regeneration of the
proton (Scheme 1.5). All compounds in which a carbocation can be
generated a to a carbon atom bearing a hydroxyl group may undergo
similar rearrangements.
1.4.2 Addition Reactions

As the name suggests, these reactions involve addition of a regent to an
unsaturated group and as such nominally display 100% atom economy.
A=A + B-C --+ AB-AC (1.2)
When the addition is initiated by attack of the n-electrons in an

unsaturated bond on an electrophile to form a carbocation the reaction is
an electrophilic addition, a very common class of reactions for alkenes.
The reaction is governed by Markovnikov's rule, which states that in
addition of HX to a substituted alkene, the H will form a bond to the
carbon of the alkene carrying the greater number of hydrogen atoms.
Scheme 1.5 Pinacol rearrangement

View Online
Another way of expressing this is that the most stable carbocation will be
formed (Scheme 1.6).
The Michael reaction involving addition to carbon-carbon double bonds
containing an electron-withdrawing group is catalysed by base. A variety
of heterogeneous bases which can be reused are known, including alumina,

KF on alumina and phenolates supported on silica, the last having proved
particularly effective for addition of P-keto esters to enones (Scheme 1.7).
Addition reactions to carbonyl groups are also important atom economic
reactions. By using chiral ligands (see Chapter 4) catalytic hydrogenation
can be carried out enantioselectively, adding to the overall greenness. This
technology is becoming increasingly used in the pharmaceutical industry;
for example S-naproxen (Scheme 1.8) can be made in high entioselectivity
using chiral ruthenium phosphine catalyst.
R
)c- + H-Br - R
R
F C H , + Br- - R
kCH,
Br
Carbocation stability: 3" > 2" =- 1"
Scheme 1.6 Electrophilic addition and Markovnikov b rule
Catalyst =
Scheme 1.7 Michael addition reaction
& c o 2 y y e . 0 2 H
/ / / /
Me0 Me0
Scheme 1.8 Enantioselective hydrogenation route to S-naproxen

View Online
12 Chapter I
I . 4.2.1 Diels-Alder reactions

Diels-Alder reactions provide one of the few general methods of forming
two carbon-carbon bonds simultaneously. The main features of these
reactions are described in Box 1.3. The reaction finds widespread
industrial use; for example hardeners for epoxy resins are made by
reaction of maleic anhydride with dienes such as 2-methyl- 1,4-butadiene.
Box 1.3 Main features of the Diels-Alder reaction

In its simplest form the Diels-Alder reaction is a cycloaddition reaction

between a conjugated diene and alkene (dienophile).
The reaction follows a concerted mechanism and hence displays a high

degree of regio- and stereoselectivity e.g. cis dienophiles give cis-substitu-
ents in the product.
Unsubstituted alkenes are relatively poor dienophiles and dienes, high

temperatures being required to force the reaction. However dienophiles
having electron-withdrawing groups, and dienes having electron-donating
groups, are considerably more reactive.
The diene needs to be able to adopt the S-cis conformation in order to react,
e.g. no reaction is observed for 2,4-hexadiene because of steric hindrance.
0 Cyclic dienes give mainly endo-products through kinetic control.
An atom economic route to the insecticide aldrin (Scheme 1.9) was

developed some fifty years ago. This very potent insecticide was later
banned in most countries owing to its toxicity to wild life. This example
illustrates the need to look at the whole product lifecycle, not just the
synthetic route.
View Online
I
Relative molecular masses CI

66 62.5 40 273 363
Atom economy = 100 x 363466 + 62.5 + 40 + 273)= 100 x 363/441.5= 82.2%
Scheme 1.9 Manufacture of Aldrin via Diels-Alder reactions
1.5 ATOM UN-ECONOMIC REACTIONS

1.5.1 Substitution Reactions
Substitutions are very common synthetic reactions; by their very nature

they produce at least two products, one of which is commonly not wanted.
As a simple example 2-chloro-2-methylpropane can be prepared in high
yield by simply mixing 2-methylpropan-2-01 with concentrated hydro-
chloric acid (Scheme 1.10). Here the hydroxyl group on the alcohol is
substituted by a chloride group in a facile SNl reaction. Whilst the by-
product in this particular reaction is only water it does reduce the atom
economy to 83%.
Most substitutions have lower atom economies than this and produce
more hazardous and a greater variety of by-products. Hexanol is much less
reactive than 2-methylpropan-2-01 in substitution reactions; one way of
converting this to the chloride involves reaction with thionyl chloride
(Scheme 1.11); here the unwanted by-products are HC1 and SO2 reducing
the overall atom economy to 55%. This readily illustrates how, even in
-t OH + HCI
Relative molecular masses

74 36.5
-
Atom economy = 100 x 92.5/(74
+ 92.5
C1
+ 36.5)= 83.7%
+ H20
18
Scheme 1.10 2-Chloro-methyl propane by SNI substitution
CH,(CH2),CH20H 4- SOCI,- CH,(CH2)4CH2CI + SO2 i- HCI

1 02 119 120.5 64 36.5
Atom economy = 100 x 120.5(102+ 119)= 54.5%
Scheme 1.1 1 An atom un-economic substitution

View Online
14 Chapter 1
simple reactions, half of the valuable atoms in a reaction can be lost as

waste.
For many years phenol was made on a large industrial scale from the
substitution reaction of benzene sulfonic acid with sodium hydroxide. This
produced sodium sulfite as a by-product. Production and disposal of this

material, contaminated with aromatic compounds, on a large scale con-
tributed to the poor economics of the process, which has now been
replaced by the much more atom economic cumene route (see Chapter 2,
Schemes 2.2 and 2.3).
1S.2 Elimination Reactions

Elimination reactions involve loss of two substituents from adjacent atoms;

as a result unsaturation is introduced. In many instances additional
reagents are required to cause the elimination to occur, reducing the
overall atom economy still further. A simple example of this is the E2
elimination of HBr from 2-bromopropane using potassium t-butoxide
(Scheme 1.12). In this case unwanted potassium bromide and t-butanol are
also produced reducing the atom economy to a low 17%.
The Hofmann elimination is useful synthetically for preparing alkenes
since it gives the least substituted alkene. The reaction involves thermal
elimination of a tertiary amine from a quaternary ammonium hydroxide;
these are often formed by alkylation of a primary amine with methyl
iodide followed by reaction with silver oxide. The mechanism of the
elimination is shown in Scheme 1.13; in this synthesis of l-methyl-l-
BuO-K+
L H L l p - -/cH. + '- + KBr

JIBr
112 122 42
Atom economy = 100 x42 /( 112 + 122) = 17.9%
Scheme 1.12 Base catalysed elimination from 2-bromopropene
Scheme 1.13 Hofmann elimination

View Online
vinylcyclohexane the atom economy is reduced to 62% through loss of

trimethylamine and water.
Hofmann elimination reactions from bi- and tri-cyclic systems can,
however, be used to create ‘internal’ unsaturation without loss of a trialkyl
amine as shown in Scheme 1.14 for the synthesis of the hexahydrothieno

[blazecine.
1S.3 Wittig Reactions

Wittig reactions are versatile and useful for preparing alkenes, under mild
conditions, where the position of the double bond is known unambigu-
ously. The reaction involves the facile formation of a phosphonium salt
from an alkyl halide and a phosphine. In the presence of base this loses
HX to form an ylide (Scheme 1.15). This highly polar ylide reacts with a
carbonyl compound to give an alkene and a stoichiometric amount of a
phosphine oxide, usually triphenylphosphine oxide.
It is the formation of this material which makes the reaction have a low
atom economy and, owing to the cost of disposal (usually by conversion to
calcium phosphate and disposal as hazardous waste), has limited its
commercial usefulness to high value products. Several methods have been
developed to recycle (Ph)3P0 into (Ph)3P but these have proved more
complex than might be expected. Typically the oxide is converted to the
chloride which is reduced by heating with aluminium. Overall this
recovery is expensive and also produces significant amounts of waste.
Scheme 1.14 Internal Hofmann elimination
- /=\ph + (Ph),PO
Scheme 1.15 Wittig reaction

View Online
16 Chapter 1
1.6 REDUCING TOXICITY

One of the underpinning principles of green chemistry is to design chemical
products and processes that use and produce less-hazardous materials. Here
hazardous covers several aspects including toxicity, flammability, explosion
potential and environmental persistence. Historically there have been two

factors which governed our approach to toxic materials. First it is only since
the 1960s that our knowledge of the toxicity of chemicals has been handled
scientifically. Before then we tended to know about the toxic effects only
after the event, usually entailing ill health or death amongst those working
with the substance. One early example of this was the early production of
nickel from its carbonyl; it was only after several strange deaths amongst
workers that it was finally realized that nickel carbonyl is highly toxic. This
is only one of many examples where we have learned through ‘trial and
error’ of the toxic nature of chemicals. This is not a criticism of the early
chemical industry since there was little knowledge regarding toxicity or
how to measure it. It may be argued that industry at the time did not take
adequate precautions to prevent exposure of workers to chemicals with
unknown hazards. However, this must be viewed in relation to the attitude
of the pioneering society at the time to risk in all walks of life. Following
discovery that a material was toxic, the ‘natural’ way to deal with it was to
somehow prevent workers from coming into contact with the material. This
philosophy led to the second factor in how we dealt with toxicity until
recently, namely one of limiting exposure. More and more elaborate ways of
limiting exposure have been developed over the years, including use of
breathing apparatus and handling of chemicals remotely.
A hazard can be defined as a situation which may lead to harm, whilst
risk is the probability that harm will occur. From the point of view of
harm being caused by exposure to a chemical, Equation 1.3 is applicable.
RISK = (function) HAZARD X EXPOSURE (1 *3)
As stated above our traditional approach to reducing the risk of some harm
being caused has been to limit the exposure by some physical means, or by
introduction of systems and working practices. Whilst this has worked
relatively well, no control measure or system can be 100% perfect. The
alternative way to minimize risk, which is the Green Chemistry approach, is
to reduce the hazard. This approach gets to the root cause of the problem and
is based on the principle of ‘what you don’t have can’t harm you’. Recent
legislation is starting to reflect this change of approach. The COSHH
(Control Of Substances Hazardous to Health) regulations require that
assessments be made of all laboratory and production work where potentially
View Online
harmhl chemicals are used. As part of this assessment, alternative proce-

dures that avoid the use of hazardous materials must be considered, and the
use of personal protective equipment to prevent worker exposure should only
be used when all other possibilities have been thoroughly considered.
The whole area of designing synthetic procedures using low-hazard

reagents is now attracting much attention. Carbon-carbon bond formation
via free radical chemistry is a very versatile method of producing a range
of materials of interest to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately the
traditional way of generating free radicals is to use highly neurotoxic
organotin compounds, especially tributyl tin hydride, an excellent radical
chain carrier. Whilst handling this compound is a significant hazard there
is also the slight but real possibility that trace amounts of organotin
compounds may be left in the product at the end of the reaction and
purification stages. This is completely unacceptable for any product
destined for ingestion by humans. Replacement of organotin compounds
has therefore been the subject of much recent research. One possible
alternative is to use an easily oxidized sulfide which could transfer an
electron to an electrophile to give a radical anion (Equation 1.4). This in
turn could fragment to give an organic radical.
One of the most readily available easily oxidized sulfides is tetrathiafulva-

lene (TTF) and this material readily transfers electrons to good electro-
philes such as arene diazonium salts. This reaction has been used to form
the tricyclic precursor to the natural product aspidospermidine, stereospe-
cifically (Scheme 1.16). Since water is very inert towards attack by free
I H,O/acetone
m ms ms
ms = methanesulphonyl Wheland Intermediate
aspidosperrnidine ms
Scheme 1.16 Radical generation without using BuJnH

View Online
18 Chapter 1
radicals the reaction is thought to proceed via attack by the radical on the
liberated TTFfBF4- complex. In this particular case the reaction is thought
to go via the Wheland intermediate, which, owing to steric hindrance of
the top face, controls the stereochemistry of the hydrolysis reaction.
1.6.1 Measuring Toxicity

Many methods have now been developed for measuring the potential
harmful effects chemicals can have. Common tests include those for
irritancy, mutagenic effects, reproductive effects and acute toxicity.
1.6.1.1 LDSo & LCJo.

LD and LC stand for lethal dose and lethal concentration respectively.

LD50 is the dose of a chemical at which 50% of a group of animals
(usually rats or mice) are killed, whilst LC50 is the concentration in air or
water of the chemical which kills 50% of test animals. These tests are the
most common ways of measuring the acute toxicity of chemicals. LD5o
tests are done by injecting, applying to the skin or giving orally a known
dose of pure chemical. The result is usually expressed in terms of
milligrams of chemical per kilogram of animal, e.g. LD5o (oral, rat) -
10 mg kg-' means that when given orally at the rate of 10 mg kg-' animal
weight the chemical will kill 50% of rats tested. Similarly LC50 tests are
usually carried out by allowing the animal to breathe a known concentra-
tion of the chemical in air, results being expressed in parts per million
(ppm) or milligrams per cubic metre (mgmP3).
Although there is much controversy over using animals in tests such as
these, the information is an essential part of the legal testing required
when new chemicals are introduced onto the market in significant
quantities. These and other toxicity test results are used to help develop
Material Safety Data Sheets, establish Occupational Exposure Limits and
guidelines for use of appropriate safety equipment.
Whilst it is obvious that the lower the LDso or LC50 is the more toxic
the chemical, it is difficult to obtain a feel for how toxic the chemical may
be to humans. Several scales have been developed to help compare toxicity
data, a commonly used one developed by Hodge and Sterner is shown in
Table 1.2.
1.6.1.2 Ames Test

Named after its inventor, Bruce Ames, the test has become one of the
common screening tests for measuring the potential carcinogenic effects of
View Online
Table 1.2 Hodge and Sterner toxicity scale
LDso (oral, rat) Likely LD f o r

Toxicity rating Toxicity term mdkg humans
Extremely toxic <I A taste

Highly toxic 1-50 -4 cm3
Moderately toxic 50-500 -30 cm3
Slightly toxic 500-5000 -600 cm3
Practically non-toxic 5000- 15 000 -1 1
Relatively harmless >15 000 >>I 1
chemicals, largely owing to its simplicity. The test is based on observations

of mutations from the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium that carries a
defective gene making it unable to synthesize histidene from the
ingredients of a culture medium. The theory is that if a chemical is
mutagenic (and therefore a possible human carcinogen) it will cause
mutations in the bacterium, a certain number of which will enable it to
synthesize histidine. Growth in the population of bacteria resulting from
the mutation can be observed directly. Some chemicals may not be
mutagenic themselves but their metabolites might be; the culture medium
therefore contains liver enzymes to include this possibility. The Ames test
has not only been used to identify synthetic chemicals that are possibly
carcinogenic but has indicated the presence of natural mutagens in food.
Two notable discoveries (Formula 1.1) are aflatoxin, found in peanut butter
(from use of mouldy peanuts), and safrole, present for some years in root
beer. The test however is not perfect: dioxin, a known animal carcinogen,
gives a negative Ames test for example.
Aflatoxi n Safrole
Formula 1.1 Natural toxins

View Online
20 Chapter I
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. There are a number of past and present commercial routes to phenol
using benzene as a feed stock. Outline two such processes, writing
balanced equations for the reactions involved. Compare the two
routes in terms of atom economy.

2. Anthraquinone is widely use in the manufacture of a range of dyes.
Two possible routes for manufacturing anthraquinone are (1) from
the reaction of 1,4-naphthoquinone with butadiene and (2) reaction
of benzene with phthalic anhydride. Describe mechanisms for both
these reactions and identify likely reaction conditions and any other
reagents required. Compare the atom economy of the two routes.
Identify three factors for each route that may influence the commer-
cial viability.
3. Give an example of an s N 1 and an sN2 reaction, explaining the
mechanism and calculating the atom economy of the reaction.
Suggest alternative synthetic routes to your products that are more
atom economic.
4. Show how styrene can be prepared using the following reactions
somewhere in your synthetic procedure, (a) Hofmann elimination, (b)
Grignard reaction, (c) Diels- Alder reaction. Compare the atom
economies of each process. Identify any issues raised by using this
approach to determine the most efficient synthetic route.
FURTHER READING
F?T. Anastas and J.C. Warner, ‘Green Chemistry Theory and Practice’,
Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.
J.A. Murphy, ‘Free Radicals in Synthesis: Clean Reagents Affording

Oxidative or Reductive Termination’, Pure and Applied Chemistry, Special
Topic Issue on Green Chemistry, 2000, 72(7) 1327.
A.S. Matlack, ‘Introduction To Green Chemistry’, Marcel Dekker, New

York, 200 1.
M. Lancaster in ‘Handbook of Green Chemistry and Technology’, eds J.H.

Clark and D.J. Macquarrie, Blackwell Publishing, Abingdon, 2002.

00001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

00001

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

00001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

View Online

Published on 01 January 2002 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781847551009-00001

Principles and Concepts of Green

Transportation - production of gasoline and diesel fiom petroleum,

The value of the chemical industry is shown in Figure 1.1. In the UK

over 450000 people are employed by the industry (including pharmaceu-

1.2 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN

Principles and Concepts of Green Chemistry 3

Commission), which defined sustainable development as: ‘. . . meeting the

comments in 1789, the Bruntland Commission did catalyse the sustain-

Green Chemistry from an industrial perspective it is important to take the

application of Green Chemistry concepts significant savings can be made,

Figure 1.2 Green chemistry as a reduction process

Box 1.1 The 12 Principles of Green Chemistry

Principles and Concepts of Green Chemistry 5

Box 1.1 continued

3. Less Hazardous Chemical Synthesis

4. Designing Safer Chemicals

5. Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries

6. Design for Energy Efficiency

7. Use of Renewable Feedstocks

10. Design for Degradation

Box 1.1 continued

11. Real-time Analysis for Pollution Prevention

12. Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention

explosions, and fires.

1.3 ATOM ECONOMY

the reaction between X and Y to give product P may proceed in 100%

Box 1.2 Measures of Reaction Eficiency

actual quantity of products achieved

yield of desired product

Principles and Concepts of Green Chemistry 7

Box 1.2 continued

% Atom Economy = 100 X

Traditionally chemists are taught to maximize the yield of a reaction.

'wasting' two carbon atoms as C02. Comparison of the two routes is

Scheme 1.1 Atom economy for maleic anhydride production routes

Table 1.1 Some atom economic and atom un-economic reactions

Atom economic reactions Atom un-economic reactions

Using benzene typical selectivities of around 65% are obtained commer-

useful illustration of how the atom economy concept is a valuable

1.4 ATOM ECONOMIC REACTIONS

Scheme 1.2 Claisen rearrangement

Principles and Concepts of Green Chemistry 9

ortho-substituted products usually predominate, some para-alkylated pro-

The Fries rearrangement of phenolic esters (Scheme 1.3) is normally

Scheme 1.3 Fries rearrangement

Scheme 1.4 Beckmann rearrangement

briefly. When vinylcyclopropanes are heated they readily undergo ring

1.4.2 Addition Reactions

A=A + B-C --+ AB-AC (1.2)

When the addition is initiated by attack of the n-electrons in an

Scheme 1.5 Pinacol rearrangement

Principles and Concepts of Green Chemistry 11

of heterogeneous bases which can be reused are known, including alumina,

using chiral ruthenium phosphine catalyst.

Scheme 1.6 Electrophilic addition and Markovnikov b rule

Scheme 1.7 Michael addition reaction

Scheme 1.8 Enantioselective hydrogenation route to S-naproxen