Materiality of Cultural Construction

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that the author argues for understanding culture as embodied practices involving things rather than just discourse, and that the study of material culture examines how people interact with and imbue meaning in objects through their use and circulation.

Some examples of material culture discussed in the text include things, feelings, values, fears, obsessions, practices, objects, environments, histories, words, and ideas.

The author defines material culture as any aspect of world-making activity that happens in material form, including both things as well as feelings, values, fears, and obsessions that inform one's understanding and use of things.

Material Religion

The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief

ISSN: 1743-2200 (Print) 1751-8342 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rfmr20

The materiality of cultural construction

David Morgan

To cite this article: David Morgan (2008) The materiality of cultural construction, Material Religion,
4:2, 228-229, DOI: 10.2752/175183408X328334

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175183408X328334

Published online: 01 May 2015.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 127

View related articles

Citing articles: 7 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rfmr20

Download by: [Ashesi University College] Date: 24 March 2017, At: 01:47
felt-knowledge that looking, touching, shopping,
the materiality of cultural revering, or praying constitutes. The context for
construction understanding things, in other words, is practice.
But practice understood as the cultivation of
david morgan embedded or embodied ways of knowing.
What do I mean by material culture? If
The appeal of the turn to material culture culture is the full range of thoughts, feelings,
consists at a theoretical level in the opportunity objects, words, and practices that human beings
to understand in much more concrete ways use to construct and maintain the life-worlds in
how the cultural construction of everyday life which they exist, material culture is any aspect
actually happens. Hitherto, cultural construction of that world-making activity that happens
meant something imprisoned in the “discourse” in material form. That means things, but it
on culture. The product of literary studies, also includes the feelings, values, fears, and

The Materiality of Cultural Constuction


cultural studies, gender and feminist analysis, obsessions that inform one’s understanding and
culture often tended to be understood as what use of things. But that’s not all. As I understand
people said or wrote about themselves or it, the study of material culture gives special
others. Analysts spent their time scrutinizing attention to the scrutiny of practices, that is,
discourse and writing as the principal artifacts of what people do with things. As a field of inquiry,
culture, which they imagined as a kind of mental material culture assumes that meaning does
substance—religion as a web of meanings, a not inhere in things, but is activated by them.
cultural system, to paraphrase Clifford Geertz; Meaning is a complex process of interaction in

David Morgan
or scholarship focused on the poetics of which people, objects, environments, histories,
ethnography, to invoke a major work by James words, and ideas take part. To be sure, some
Clifford and George Marcus. Think of the legacy objects seem to function only as denotations
of structuralism’s analysis of stories and myths of codes. Like traffic signs: once you know the
or the complicated verbiage of semiotics, where code, the signifier is devoid of interest. The sign
the anatomy of discourse is analyzed in terms of tells you to stop or go, nothing more. But most
signs and signifiers. things aren’t so ancillary to meaning-making.
Without question, what people say and They enter into it much more integrally, messily.
write is very powerful and deserving of the Most objects acquire their significance through
most careful study. The degree to which the engagement with people and an object user’s
nomenclature and methods of semiotics and interaction with other people and objects.
structuralism, not to mention the work of Geertz, This means at least two very important
have been absorbed not only by anthropologists, things for the study of material culture. First,
but also by art historians and other scholars it foregrounds the study of exchange and
suggests just how useful they have proven to its complicated and varied forms since the
be. The challenge, it seems to me, is to think value of an object will draw powerfully from
about the relationship of words to actions and its social career, that is, its circulation among
things. The point is not to extract ideas from people. As an object moves from one person
what people do, which returns us to the spirit to the next, from one social setting or one
versus matter model of studying religion. But culture to the next, it acquires different values
the turn to materiality today does not mean a re- and associations, negotiating differences and
turn to an object-centered study like traditional carrying with it veneers of significance that will
models of art history or archaeology, where tell us much about what objects do. Second,
classifying objects according to taxonomies rather than understanding objects as projectiles
Volume 4
Issue 2

of taste or technological achievement was bearing the intentions of their makers, it is more
228 the principal concern. Nowadays scholars of productive to study the response to objects as
material culture are much more intrigued by the they are displayed, exchanged, destroyed, and
circulated in order to determine what they mean
to people, that is to say, how they build and
maintain life-worlds. Meaning is not only abstract
and discursive, but embodied, felt, interactive,
David Morgan is Professor of Religion at Duke University.
and cumulative. This means that the cultural
He is author most recently of The Lure of Images: A History
of Religion and Visual Media in America (Routledge, 2007) construction of reality is not a wispy evocation
and editor of Key Words in Religion, Media, and Culture of words about objects, but a concrete process
that invites us to take a careful look at objects.
Material Religion

(Routledge, 2008).
In Conversation

Material Religion volume 4, issue 2, pp. 228–229


DOI: 10.2752/175183408X328334
Material culture is a fruitful way to analysis. This tends to exclude popular
understand how religion works since many imagery and any kind of pictures that do not
scholars have come to regard belief as shifting conform to the canonical constraints that art
sets of practices, as what people do rather than history traditionally imposed on its subjects
only or primarily the creeds or doctrines and practitioners. Film, cartoons, television,
to which they assent. Even when some pornography, posters, photography, popular
believers castigate, proscribe, or destroy prints, commercial advertising, and many
objects such as images we have the other kinds of images were commonly ignored
opportunity to see material culture at work. or included only insofar as they illuminated
Visual culture is a vital subset of material the understanding of fine art. But the study
culture and conforms as a focus of study to of material culture, to which visual culture
everything I’ve said here about material culture. belongs as a subfield, has moved beyond such
As an art historian, I find traditional approaches limitations. People make their worlds from
to the study of images of limited value since anything at hand, so if we wish to understand
they tend to scrutinize images as message- the architecture of their lives, we must consider
bearing devices whose meanings can be everything they use to build it and keep it in
extracted by iconographical and stylistic working order.

229

You might also like