Argamassa Construction Materials: Case Study
Argamassa Construction Materials: Case Study
Argamassa Construction Materials: Case Study
1. Table of Contents
1. CURRENT SITUATION..................................................................................................................3
1.1 Argamassa and Leandro Giuntini................................................................................................3
1.2 Leandro Giuntini and Eduardo Santiago...................................................................................3
2. IDENTIFYING The PROBLEMS..................................................................................................4
2.1 Increase in costs................................................................................................................................4
2.2 Cutting down employee benefits...................................................................................................4
2.3 Lack of trust......................................................................................................................................4
2.4 Loosing good relationship...............................................................................................................4
3. POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................................5
3.1 Reduction in Overtime Hours........................................................................................................5
3.3 Competitive Pricing.........................................................................................................................6
4. RESOLVING THE ISSUES.............................................................................................................6
5. RECOMMENDATION.....................................................................................................................7
6. REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................8
1. CURRENT SITUATION
1.1 Argamassa and Leandro Giuntini
After learning the cement mortar business from his father’s company, Leandro Giuntini and his
brother Flavio founded Argamassa in 2003. With the help of their father, who provided the
connections of the industry. By having Flavio focused on sales, Leandro Giuntini focused on
manufacturing operations and new product formulas. It guaranteed a on time delivery with great
quality. By 2010, Argamassa owned 3 manufacturing plants and employed over 90 people. All
other companies at that time never treated their employees well but Giuntini was not like that, he
helped his employees in building homes and used to lent money for their purchases. Their Sales
increased by 86% in 2005 and another 48% in 2006. Giuntini celebrated the company’s
anniversaries and Christmases by giving gifts and bonus to their employees which gained a good
Eduardo Santiago is an old friend of Giuntini who had done finance at the University of
Pernambuco and looking to work in business administration which was his dream. When he first
joined Argamassa his duty was to solve the rampant disorganization and inefficiency. At that
time Production was using 55% of its capacity, whereas employees were working overtime.
Costs were increased which decreased the profits, but Santiago managed the situation by
appointing a new competent manager and monitoring the key performance indicators he reduced
the material wastage. By the end of 2008, there was no overtime pay which balanced the
situation of loss and profit. Then to increase the profit Giuntini surged the prices without
informing Santiago at the time whereas two new entrants joined the market with reduced prices
which diminished the sales by 10% and stopped all employees’ additional benefits.
Variable costs increased by 15% and fixed costs by 10% in 2007, which resulted 81% drop in the
company profits. So, to rise the profits Leandro Giuntini soared the price of the products without
consulting Santiago when there are two new companies started business by providing the same
products with low prices. Thereby the sales of Argamassa dropped by 10%
Since the sales are dropped by the increase in the price of the products. Leandro Giuntini reduced
the employee benefits to just above the minimum required by law without consulting Santiago.
He also stopped paying for lunches or groceries of the employees, which played a large part of
the reason why some employees came to work with Argamassa than from working in other
companies.
Even after the reduction in the employee benefits, employees agreed with Giuntini because
Santiago promised them that they will again give their benefits when profits did. So, they trusted
Leandro Giuntini as he was the person who helped the workers a lot. But Giuntini broke their
trust on him when the profits started by cost reduction, he invested the money on buying new
Since there is no change in benefits even after seeing the profits, there started a toxic relationship
between the labour and the management. Sales representatives who normally pushed Argamassa
products started dedicating more time to other companies’ products which dropped the growth in
sales and even employees started being less productive to stay longer than the expected time and
3. POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES
Though the factory was running on half of its capacity, the employee continued to work
overtime. This led to more burden on the company which incurred more loss. Therefore, it was
necessary for the administration to decrease the expenditure. For example, without raising any
worries about the future of the organization, the organization should disclose the situation to the
workers, or split the overtime into different groups that can contribute to expenditure control,
Result:
Decreasing the expenditure will consequently stabilize the situation. The organisation should
have applied the rule to prevent such an issue, as there is a basic financial concept requiring the
concepts. For example, leveraging the capital available for manufacturing, providing consumers
Result:
When a business has different variety of resources and assets available, it will have the ability to
Any company's management must consider conducting a market analysis. A cheaper price does
not necessarily mean the quality of the commodity is inferior. In comparison, the higher price
applies to the higher quality for certain clients. Thus, price is also a key factor in improving
sales.
Result:
The organisation will be able to make the most of its profits and keep the sales as high as
First, we discussed the decision of Giuntini to invest in trucks and manufacturing instead of
returning workers' former benefits as company turned to profitability. The bond between labour
and management was impaired by this promise infringement. This argument drew our attention
process and performance, such as rate of revenue, net income and retention of the employees. As
we learnt trust towards management are based on 3 categories: ability, goodwill and honesty.
Clearly, Giuntini did good on the first two factors. His dedication and willingness to perform
several tasks at the same time reflected the trust of employees in his leadership expertise and
abilities. In addition, at the start, the compensation and respectful treatment of the employees
reflected his caring nature, consideration for their needs, and made them feel that the
management will help them in any difficulties. The breach of promise has had a significant effect
on management and workplace attitudes. Present employees have become less active and poor
habits have been followed by new hires. In order to preserve employee trust in the company,
The current situation at Argamassa has also raised us questions regarding internal
process, he spends more time to deal the relationship with workers and front-line staff. Also due
to his competitive management style and good employee benefits, the employees were firmly
committed to the company. They were ready to accept the cuts and get along with him through
the difficulties. This created undoubted leadership among the employees. Eduardo Santiago then
discovered two possible complications from the cutback judgement of Giuntini. First, after
Giuntini wanted to cut costs by abandoning the different perks for employees, he avoided
working with Eduardo Santiago, who played a major role in the problem-solving process in
2007. This resulted in discontinued function of Santiago’s role. Furthermore, it confused the
leadership recognition towards workers which passively affects the productivity of the workers
and the quality of management. As we learned in this course we would apply “rational decision-
making process” to the Argamassa’s case. When an issue is identified, we should start to collect
channel. A number of parties that share the interest of the company should be considered by the
decision maker. In this situation, before deciding to increase the costs, Giuntini should consult
with the consumers, estimate the potential competitors and determine the implications. On the
other side, he should devote more time getting input from front line staff, consulting
management peers, and encouraging subordinates to plan consequential impacts before choosing
5. RECOMMENDATION
Firstly, Giuntini should restrain himself from interfering in Santiago role and stop his
micromanaging. This will offer flexibility to Santiago and other executives to introduce new
ideas and will give workers a strong view about who they can listen to and follow. Secondly, the
marketing budget should be increased in order to retrieve the sales growth of the company. This
will bring new clients to Argamassa for Business. Lastly, gain back the trust of employee and
create a new compensation structure. This would decrease the toxic relation between employees
and management, improve the work efficiency and reduces overtime costs.
6. REFERENCES
[1]. Johns, G., & Saks, A. M. (2019). Organizational behaviour: understanding and managing life