Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 39 views

    Index of Authorities: Legislation

    Uploaded by

    Swarnima
    The document appears to be an index for a legal case making arguments on several issues. It lists the legislation, cases, books, and legal databases referred to for the case. The jurisdiction statement indicates the Supreme Court of India is hearing petitions filed under Articles 132 and 134 of the Indian Constitution regarding a case involving a respondent named Ramesh.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Index of Authorities: Legislation

    Uploaded by

    Swarnima
    39 views4 pages
    The document appears to be an index for a legal case making arguments on several issues. It lists the legislation, cases, books, and legal databases referred to for the case. The jurisdiction statement indicates the Supreme Court of India is hearing petitions filed under Articles 132 and 134 of the Indian Constitution regarding a case involving a respondent named Ramesh.

    Original Title

    Issue 4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document appears to be an index for a legal case making arguments on several issues. It lists the legislation, cases, books, and legal databases referred to for the case. The jurisdiction statement indicates the Supreme Court of India is hearing petitions filed under Articles 132 and 134 of the Indian Constitution regarding a case involving a respondent named Ramesh.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    39 views4 pages

    Index of Authorities: Legislation

    Uploaded by

    Swarnima
    The document appears to be an index for a legal case making arguments on several issues. It lists the legislation, cases, books, and legal databases referred to for the case. The jurisdiction statement indicates the Supreme Court of India is hearing petitions filed under Articles 132 and 134 of the Indian Constitution regarding a case involving a respondent named Ramesh.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Issue 1. Whether the appeal is main tenable ?

    C has rightly acquitted the respondent of all the


    charges ?

    Issue3. Whether the state is justified in seeking permission for .

    INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

    LEGISLATION

    1. THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION ACT, 1950.


    2. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860.
    3. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.

    CASES REFERRED

     Basdev v. State of Pepsu, AIR 1956 SC 488


     Bherusingh v. State, 1956 Madh. BLJ 905
     Brend v. Wood, (1946) 62 TLR 462;
     C. Magesh v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 2768, 49;
     Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana, AIR 1978 SC 1492.
     Garib Singh v. State of Punjab, 1972 Cr LJ 1286.
     Ghurey Lal v. State of UP Criminal Appeal No. 155 of 2006
     Hanuman Prasad vs State of Rajasthan, (2009) 1 SCC 507.
     Harbans Nonia vs State of Bihar, AIR 1992 SC125: 1992 Cr LJ 105.
     Lata singh v.State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2006 SC 2522
     Mehbub Shah vs King Emperor, AIR 1945 PC 148.
     Mepa Dana, (1959) Bom LR 269
     Nandu & Dhaneshwar Naik v. The State, 1976 CrLJ 250.
     Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 43.
     Oswal Danji v. State, (1960) 1 Guj LR 145
     Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad, AIR 1955 SC 216
     Queen vs. Gora Chand Gope & Ors (1866) 5 South WR (Cri) 45.
     R v Parks, (1992) 2 S.C.R. 871
     R v. Prince, L.R. 2 C.C.R. 154 (1875);
     R v. Tolson, (1889) 23 QBD 168
     Ramchander & Ors. v. The State of Rajasthan, 1970 CrLJ 653.
     Shaik China Brahmam v. State of A.P., AIR 2008 SC 610.
     Sohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan, 1990 Cr LJ 2302: AIR 1990 SC 2158.
     State of Bihar v. Lala Mahto A.I.R 1955 pat. 161.
     Suraj Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2008 (11) SCR 286.
     T.J.Edward v. C.A. Victor Immanuel, 2002 Cr LJ 1670 (ker).
     Uma Dutta v. State of Rajasthan, 1990 Cr LJ 2302: AIR 1990 SC 2158.
     Veer Singh v. State of U.P., 2010 (1) A.C.R. 294 (All.)
     William Slaney v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1956 SC 116.
     Woolmington v. D.P.P., 1935 AC 462;

    BOOKS REFERRED

     V.N. SHUKLA, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (12TH ED., 2013).


     DR. D.D. BASU, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA, (8TH ED., 2009).
     P.M. BAKSHI, THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA, (14TH ED., 2017).
     DR. J.N. PANDEY, THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA, (51ST ED., 2014).
     H.M. SEERVAI, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA, (4TH ED., 2010).
     R.S. BEDI, THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA, (10TH ED., 2013).
     DR. S.C. KASHYAP, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA, (1ST ED., 2008).
     DR. J. N. PANDEY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA,54TH EDITION, 2017.
     C.K TAKWANI, LECTURES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, FOURTH EDITION, 2007.
     K D GAUR, TEXTBOOK ON INDIAN PENAL CODE, SIXTH EDITION, 2018.
     UNIVERAL’S CRIMINAL MANUAL, 2017 EDITION.
     SHAILENDER MALIK, THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, TWENTY FIFTH EDITION, 2011.
     RATANLAL AND DHIRAJLAL, THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, THIRTHY FOURTH
    EDITION, 2012

    LEGAL DATABASES

     WWW.YOURARTICLELIBRARY.COM
     WWW.LEGALSERVICEINDIA.COM
     WWW.INDIANKANOON.ORG
     WWW.LAWRATO.COM
     WWW.MANUPATRA.COM
     WWW.INDIANCASELAWS.ORG
     WWW.INDLAW.COM
     WWW.JUDIC.NIC.IN
     WWW.LEXISNEXIS.COM
     WWW.SCCONLINE.CO.IN
     WWW.WESTLAW.COM
     WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV

    IMPORTANT DEIFINITION:
    1. The appellant for the purpose of this memorandum shall be the State.
    2. The respondents for the purpose of all the issue shall be Ramesh .
    STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

    The Petitioner has approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India under Article 132 and
    134 of the Constitution of India,1950.

    The respondents have appeared to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in response to the
    petitions filed by the petitioners.

    You might also like