Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics PDF

Manual of
RETAINERS IN
ORTHODONTICS
Manual of
RETAINERS IN
ORTHODONTICS
Prithiviraj Jeyaraman
MDS Orthodontics
Fellowship in oral Implantology (Switzerland)
Fellow and Master in Oral Implantology (ICOI)
Professor and Head
Department of Orthodontics
Faculty of Dentistry
Melaka Manipal Medical College
Melaka, Malaysia
Forewords
Thierry Vuillemin
Vijayalakshmi K
JAYPEE BROTHERS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (P) LTD

New Delhi • London • Philadelphia • Panama
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
Headquarters
4838/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj
New Delhi 110 002, India
Phone: +91-11-43574357
Fax: +91-11-43574314
Email: [email protected]
Overseas Offices
J.P. Medical Ltd Jaypee-Highlights Medical Publishers Inc
83 Victoria Street, London City of Knowledge, Bld. 237, Clayton
SW1H 0HW (UK) Panama City, Panama
Phone: +44 20 3170 8910 Phone: +1 507-301-0496
Fax: +44 (0)20 3008 6180 Fax: +1 507-301-0499
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
Jaypee Medical Inc Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
The Bourse 17/1-B Babar Road, Block-B, Shaymali
111 South Independence Mall East Mohammadpur, Dhaka-1207
Suite 835, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA Bangladesh
Phone: +1 267-519-9789 Mobile: +08801912003485
Email:[email protected] Email: [email protected]
Bhotahity, Kathmandu, Nepal
Phone: +977-9741283608
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.jaypeebrothers.com
Website: www.jaypeedigital.com
© 2014, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
The views and opinions expressed in this book are solely those of the original contributor(s)/author(s) and do not
necessarily represent those of editor(s) of the book.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers.
All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Medical knowledge and practice change constantly. This book is designed to provide accurate, authoritative
information about the subject matter in question. However, readers are advised to check the most current
information available on procedures included and check information from the manufacturer of each product to be
administered, to verify the recommended dose, formula, method and duration of administration, adverse effects
and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the practitioner to take all appropriate safety precautions. Neither
the publisher nor the author(s)/editor(s) assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property
arising from or related to use of material in this book.
This book is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in providing professional medical services. If
such advice or services are required, the services of a competent medical professional should be sought.
Every effort has been made where necessary to contact holders of copyright to obtain permission to reproduce
copyright material. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, the publisher will be pleased to make the necessary
arrangements at the first opportunity.
Inquiries for bulk sales may be solicited at: [email protected]
Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics
First Edition: 2014
ISBN 978-93-5152-358-1
Printed at
Dedicated to
My beloved Grandfather
Dr Chittrambalam G
Foreword
Orthodontic treatment has experienced a wide acceptance within

the normal population in the last few decades and mainly younger
people seek for a perfect smile. The appliances turned to become
more and more sophisticated, therefore, mild as well as severe
dental malocclusions could be treated with a high success rate.
Conversely numerous publications describe remarkable relapses
in several occlusal traits, especially the alignment of the anterior
teeth. The relapse in orthodontic treatment is associated to various
aspects, including periodontal and occlusal factors, pressure from
the oral soft tissue and growth. Therefore, orthodontic retainers
have the substantial function of providing stability for the outcome
achieved at the end of the treatment. Several devices are used for
orthodontic retention either they are removable or fixed. This book
reviews the principles for the use of retention following orthodontic
treatment and describes all the different types of retainers currently
used for this purpose. As healthcare professionals, we should always
consider the patient‘s desire for improvement of the quality of life,
but we should also keep the achieved results over a long period of
time. Retainers are certainly not the attractive part of the orthodontic
treatment, but they are the key for a long lasting beautiful smile.
Thierry Vuillemin Dr Med Dr Med Dent

Specialist of Maxillofacial Surgery
Fribourg, Switzerland
Foreword
I am delighted to write this Foreword to the Manual of Retainers in

Orthodontics authored by Dr Prithiviraj, an Orthodontist.
This book is an outstanding presentation in specialty of
Orthodontics by Dr Prithiviraj. This book is the original work of the
author and reflects his dedicated contribution in this field.
The language used is simple and lucid. All the chapters are well
referenced with case reports/figures and well-defined illustrations
for much easy understanding of the subject. Advanced techniques
on the clinical management in orthodontics are well projected with
distinguishing features on research. The book delivers a deep rooted
knowledge on the subject.
In short, it is a standard textbook useful for undergraduates, post-
graduates and the practitioners as well.
I am sure that the book will be widely received and the student’s
fraternity will greatly benefit.
Vijayalakshmi K mds Orthodontics

Professor and Head
Department of Orthodontics
Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital
Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India
Preface
This Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics is an all-inclusive primer,

which is essentially deemed to provide dental students and
practitioners an insight into orthodontic retainers. It also provides
expedient information on a wide array of retainers that have been
used in the past with no intent of remarking the benefits of one over
the other.
Given that there is a dearth of a comprehensive account of
orthodontic retainers, the theme harbored interest, which stemmed
the idea behind the conception of this manual. This manual presents
various clinical scenarios with supporting literature substantiation,
assisting the reader with easier preferences during their clinical
practice.
With the future of orthodontics hurtling at a swift pace, there
would be a need to revise this manual to expand prospects for
readers of orthodontics.
Prithiviraj Jeyaraman
Acknowledgments
I am extremely happy to bring out my first book. I thank His Holiness

Sri Sri Ganapathi Sachidananda Swamiji, my Lord and my Guru
for leading my way through difficult times and making this book
happen. I am indebted to my parents who brought me to this world;
especially my father Dr Jeyaraman C who introduced me into the
wonderful world of dentistry.
My sincere thanks to all my teachers especially my Principal
Dr Srinivasan B, my guide Dr Vijayalakshmi K, for being patient
with me all through my student years and making me what I am
now. I thank Dr Vuillemin who is an inspiration and model to me
and whom I follow in everyday practice.
My heartfelt thanks to Dr Dhanasekhar and Dr Aparna for their
help and support in bringing out this book, and also to Dr Saptarishi
for his help.
My sincere thanks to Shri Jitendar P Vij (Group Chairman),
Mr Ankit Vij (Group President) and Mr Tarun Duneja (Director-
Publishing) of M/s Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd,
New Delhi, India and all staffs of the Bengaluru Branch.
Contents
1. Introduction 1
Retention 1
2. Retention 3
Factors 3
Types 4
3. Stability 6
School of Thoughts on Retention 6
Theorems on Retention 6
Occlusal and Soft Tissue Factors 11
Facial Growth and Occlusal Development 11
4. Relapse 13
5. Retainers 14
Types of Retainers 14
6. Removable Retainers 16
Hawley Retainer 16
Wrap-around Retainer 18
Non-acrylic Removable Retainer 19
Positioner Appliance 19
Organic Polymer Wire for Esthetic
Maxillary Retainers 22
Invisible Retainers 23
Essix Retainers 24
xvi Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics
7. Active Retainers 26
Realignment of Irregular Incisors 26
Activatable Retention Technique 28
Types of Active Retainers 28
8. Functional Appliances 31
Andresen Appliance 31
Activator 31
Bionator Appliance 33
Functional Regulator 33
Removable Plastic Herbst Retainer 34
9. Fixed Retainers 36
Bonded Retainers 36
Third-generation Mandibular Bonded
Lingual 3–3 Retainer 37
Prefabricated Retainer 41
In Vivo Studies of Bonded Retainers 45
Index 51
Introduction
Retention
1
One of the most important aspects in orthodontic treatment is
retention. Orthodontic treatment results are potentially unstable
and therefore, retention is necessary for three reasons.
The three reasons are as follows:
1. The gingival and periodontal tissues are affected by orthodontic
tooth movement and require time for reorganization when the
appliances are removed.
2. Changes produced by growth may alter the orthodontic
treatment results.
3. The teeth may be in inherently unstable position after the
treatment, so that soft tissue pressures constantly produce a
relapse tendency.
The tendency of the teeth to move back from post-treatment to
the pretreatment position is relapse. Orthodontists have long since
been aware of the fact that teeth that have been moved in or through
the bone by mechanical appliances have a tendency to return to
their former position.
Retention in relation to orthodontics can be defined as the
holding of teeth in ideal esthetic and functional positions. The type
of retentive measures and the duration of their use are determined
by how many teeth have been moved and how far, the occlusion and
age of the patient, the cause of a particular malocclusion, the rapidity
of correction, the length of cusps and health of tissues involved.
Retention Planning
Retention planning is divided into three categories depending on
the type of treatment instituted:
2 Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics
1. Limited retention.
2. No retention.
3. Prolonged or permanent retention.
Retainer
Many appliance types have been used for the retention of post-
treatment tooth position. The first appliances proposed were
bonded or banded fixed appliances, then removable retainers were
advocated. Most recently the uses of bonded fixed retainers have
been introduced:
1. The retainers can be classified into removable, fixed or a
combination of both. The fixed retainer provides a greater degree
of support and control than a removable retainer.
2. A fixed retainer is commonly bonded to the lingual of the lower
anterior teeth following a fixed appliance treatment, while
a removable retainer remains the retainer of choice for the
maxillary arch.
The purpose of this book was to obtain detailed information
about retention, stability, relapse and mainly on various type of
retainers used in orthodontics.
Retention 2
Retention is one of the controversies of modern orthodontics, with
uncertainty being the only certainty. Angle stated that “the problem
involved in retention is so great as to test the utmost skill of the most
competent orthodontist, often being greater than the difficulties
being encountered in the treatment of the case up to this point”.
Retention according to Joondeph and Riedel is the holding of teeth
in ideal esthetic and functional position.
Joondeph and Riedel attempted to rationalize the problem and
summarized his findings in three statements:
1. Teeth moved through bones by orthodontic appliances, often
have a tendency to return to their former positions.
2. Arch form, particularly mandibular arch form cannot be
permanently altered by appliance therapy.
3. Bone and adjacent tissues must be allowed time to reorganize
after treatment.
Planning for and executing retention are the most difficult
elements of the clinical orthodontic practice. No means are yet
available to help predict relapse or to give objective advice about
duration of retention. It is apparent that our knowledge of the variables
contributing to post-treatment relapse remains incomplete, but any
attempt at planning the retention phase requires some semblance of
rationality in so far as possible.
Factors
The six factors important in the planning of this phase of treatment:
1. Obtaining informed consent.
2. The original malocclusion and the patient’s growth pattern.
3. The type of treatment performed.
4. The need for adjunctive procedures to enhance stability.
5. The type of retainer.
6. The duration of retention.
The type of retentive measures and the duration of their use

allegedly are determined by:
1. How many teeth have been moved, and how far?
2. The occlusion and age of the patient.
3. The cause of a particular malocclusion.
4. The rapidity of correction.
5. The length of cusp and health of the tissues involved.
6. The relationships of the inclined planes.
7. The size of the arches or arch harmony.
8. The muscular pressure.
9. The approximal contact.
10. The cell metabolism and atmospheric pressure.
The position of teeth in the dental arch is dictated primarily by
the shape and the relationship of the jaws, and by forces from the
surrounding soft tissue. Following a course of orthodontic treatment,
the teeth should be in a position of balance, but a period of retention is
still usually necessary to allow the supporting tissues to adapt. In rare
cases, permanent retention is required. A distinction should be made
between relapse of orthodontic treatment and changes that are a result
of facial growth and occlusal maturation. For the patient, these changes
are undesirable whatever the cause, but the clinician should recognize
their different etiologies. Relapse should be anticipated and avoided,
but the prediction of facial growth changes is much more uncertain.
The clinician should be aware of the possibility of the unfavorable
occlusal changes and should warn the patient accordingly.
Types
Following orthodontic treatment, the occlusion may be self-retentive,
as when an upper incisor is moved over the bite and no retention
appliance will be required. Unless there is positive occlusal retention
of the treatment result, it is usual to fit a retainer at least until the
supporting tissues have reorganized fully. Retention can be short-
term, medium-term and permanent retention.
Short-term Retention
Short-term retention extends from 3 to 6 months, while the
supporting tissues are reorganized. Removable appliances are the
Retention 5
most useful because it can be worn only part time towards the end of
the retention period.
A typical regime would be full-time wear for the first 3 months
followed by nights only wear for a similar period. The advantage of
concluding retention with part-time wear is that if the teeth become
more mobile or if the appliance is difficult to insert after it has been
left out, this indicates that the tooth positions may be not stable.
There is little merit in then extending the retention period in the
hope that things will improve.
Medium-term Retention
Medium-term retention is appropriate where the supporting tissues
will take a longer time to adapt or where it is decided to stabilize
the occlusion during the later stages of the facial growth, so that
dentoalveolar adaptation does not results in adverse occlusal changes
and in particular, in lower incisor crowding. Medium-term retention
may extend from 1 to 5 years. A fixed retainer will generally be used
and although some orthodontists use positioners in this capacity. It
should be used only where there are clear indications that it will be
beneficial and not merely to postpone the inevitable relapse of an
unstable treatment result.
Permanent Retention
Permanent retention (long-term retention) can be justified only
in exceptional circumstances, e.g. in the patient with a cleft of the
lip and palate where a prosthesis can act as retainer and in adult
patients with periodontal problems where there is no alternative, but
to stabilize the teeth permanently.
Clinicians who fully grasp the underlying principles of retention,
who appreciate its difficulties and who are able and willing to devote
to it that high order of mechanical skills, which adequate retaining
devices demand will find few things in dentistry, which bring quite
the satisfaction and permanent pleasure as the branch they have
chosen to practice (orthodontia). —Calvin Case, 1980
Stability
School of Thoughts on Retention
3
Stability is the condition of maintaining equilibrium. This refers to
the condition of being stable.
There are four schools of thoughts on retention:
1. Occlusion school (Kingsley): According to this school, a proper
occlusion of teeth is a potent factor in maintaining the stability of
the teeth. At the end of active treatment, there should be proper
intercuspation and interdigitation. There should be cusp-to-
fossa relationship between maxillary and mandibular teeth.
2. Apical base school (Axel Lundstrom): Apical base is one of
the most important factors in both correction of malocclusion
as well as maintenance of correct occlusion. Intercanine and
intermolar width should not be altered.
3. Mandibular incisor school (Grieve and Tweed): The mandibular
incisors should be placed upright and over the basal bone.
4. Musculature school (Rogers): Establishing proper functional
muscle balance is a must to achieve stable occlusion.
Theorems on Retention
The theorems on retention are as given below.
Theorem 1
Teeth that have been moved tend to return to their former
positions.
There seems to be general agreement that teeth should be held
in their corrected positions for sometimes after changes are made
in their positions. Only a few orthodontists have suggested that
retention is routinely unnecessary.
Stability 7
Theorem 2
Elimination of the cause of malocclusion will prevent
recurrence.
Until more is known about the causative factors that are related
to particular types of malocclusion, little can be done about their
elimination. When obvious habits, such as thumb or finger sucking
or lip biting are causes of malocclusion, little difficulty is presented
in diagnosis. It is important one of the most insidious habits that
operate against satisfactory retention is tongue posture, which
results in anterior and sometimes lateral open bites. The mere fact
that patient has been directed along a course of tongue therapy and
has been able to meet all the exercise requirements of the therapist
on command does not guarantee correction.
Theorem 3
Malocclusion should be over corrected as a safety factor.
It is common practice on the part of many orthodontists to
over correct class II malocclusions into an edge-to-edge incisor
relationship. One must be aware, however, that these over corrections
may be the result of overcoming muscular balance rather than
absolute tooth movement.
One of the most irritating types of relapse is the tendency for
a previously rotated tooth to attempt to rotate toward its former
position. Over rotation has not often been carried out and there
is no evidence to indicate that it is successful in preventing return
to former position. It is often possible to prevent anterior teeth
from erupting in a rotated position by providing space for them to
erupt unimpeded, either by orthodontic appliances or by the early
extraction of deciduous teeth.
Theorem 4
Proper occlusion is a potent factor in holding teeth in their
corrected positions.
From the standpoint of reducing the potential of irritations to
the periodontium, an excellent functional occlusion is certainly to
be desired. Orthodontists often blame over function or pounding of
the mandibular canines by the maxillary canines for relapse in the
mandibular anterior area. The everyday evidence presented by the
tremendous wear that many teeth undergo would indicates that they
do not move in response to repeated grinding and tapping, until bone
has been so thoroughly destroyed as not to prevent their migration
or until fibrous tissues builds up to such a degree that it actually
moves the teeth and function of these teeth is not possible. Certainly
we have all observed instances of mandibular anterior irregularity
of collapse, in which canines, either have not yet erupted or are not
actually in occlusion. Studies evaluating stability of mandibular arch
show no difference in long-term response between patient with
anterior tooth contact when compared to individuals with anterior
open bite malocclusion devoid of canine contact in centric positions
and functional excursions. It is doubtful that proper intercuspation
or interlocking is the most potent factor in retention.
Theorem 5
Bone and adjacent tissues must be allowed time to reorganize
around newly positioned teeth.
Some type of either fixed or rigid appliance only inhibitory in nature
and not dependent on the teeth should be used. Histologic evidence
shows that bone and tissues around teeth that have been moved are
altered and considerable times elapse before complete reorganization
occurs. Present day orthodontic concepts, however, regard bone as
being a plastics substance and considered tooth position to result
from equilibrium of the muscular forces surrounding the teeth. The
placement of retentive appliances, then, is an admission of inadequate
orthodontic correction or of a predetermined decision to place teeth
in relatively unstable positions for esthetic reasons. Whether stability
increases with prolonged retention is the one of the most interesting
points of discussion in regard to retention planning and is the phase
of treatment that is most difficult to quantify.
Theorem 6
If the lower incisors are placed upright over the basal bone, they
are more likely to remain in good alignment.
Therefore attention should be directed to the proper angulation
and placement of the mandibular incisor segment. It is obvious that
the difficulty of evaluating this contention revolves around proof of
the fact that incisors have been placed upright over the basal bone.
Stability 9
We have been able to define upright: perpendicular to the mandibular

plane, 5° or some specified angulation to the occlusal plane or
Frankfort horizontal plane, etc. however, no one can specify where
basal bone begins or ends and there seems to be no satisfactory
method of measuring it.
It has sometimes been assumed that teeth that are upright are
also over the basal bone. However, there are cases in which the roots
of mandibular incisors have been moved labialy to a considerable
degree in the process of uprighting these teeth. It is significant that
many malocclusions present with mandibular incisors upright and
‘over basal bone’ and yet these teeth are both crowded and rotated.
Teeth are supposedly having the very attributes of stability can be in
a state of malocclusion.
If the patient is growing, the mandibular anterior segment may
exhibit a physiologic migration in relation to the mandibular body
in a distal direction that is apart from orthodontic treatment. It can
be readily seen, if the mandibular anterior section is moved lingually
during orthodontic treatment, this movement may be in harmony
with the normal expected migration of these teeth; hence, retentive
care may be minimized. However, we believe that mandibular
arch form plays a more important role in stable mandibular tooth
alignment than does the relative anteroposterior relationship of
mandibular denture to base.
Theorem 7
Corrections carried out during periods of growth are less likely
to relapse.
There seems to be little direct evidence to substantiate this
statement, but it is logical. If orthodontists are in any way able to
influence growth and development of the maxilla or mandible, then
certainly it is logical to presume that growth can be influenced only,
while the patient is growing.
Early diagnosis and treatment planning appear to afford several
advantages in long-term stability. Institution of early treatment can
prevent progressive, irreversible tissue or bony changes, maximize the
use of growth and development with concomitant tooth eruption,
allow interception of the mild occlusion prior to excessive dental
and morphologic compensations and allow correction of skeletal
malrelationships, while sutures are morphologically immature and
more amenable to alteration.
Much has been said about changes in muscle balance established

by changing a position of teeth, which in turn will promote rather
than retard normal growth. Whether malrelations in muscle balance
have as much influence on growth and development as has been
supposed is difficult to say. It might be mentioned that changes in
muscle balance in normal direction would allow for more normal
development of the dentition, in relation to retention, normal muscle
balance should allow for normal arch alignment.
Theorem 8
The further teeth have been moved, the less likelihood there is
of relapse.
When it has been necessary to move teeth a great distance the
patient will probably need less retentive attention or perhaps it is
desirable to move teeth further during the process of orthodontic
treatment.
It is possible that positioning far from the original environment will
produce equilibrium states permitting most satisfactory occlusions.
There is little real evidence to support the statement that the further
teeth have been moved the less relapse tendency they will have. In
fact, the opposite may be true. It may be more desirable through
guidance of eruption and early interception of skeletal dysplasias
to minimize the need for future extensive tooth movement, with
the resultant impact on the functional environment and such local
factors as supracrestal fibers.
Theorem 9
Arch form, particularly in the mandibular arch, cannot be
permanently altered by appliance therapy.
Therefore treatment should be directed toward maintaining
the arch form presented by the malocclusion as much as possible.
The evidence brought to our attention by Hayes Nance and others,
that attempts to alter mandibular arch form in the human dentition
generally meet with failure, has been accepted realistically by some
orthodontists.
Stability 11
Occlusal and Soft Tissue Factors

Soft Tissue Factor
An occlusion before orthodontic treatment is in balance between
occlusal and soft tissues force, unless a new position of balance can
be found, changes will not be stabled. As general rule the size and
the form of the lower arch has to be accepted. Lower arch width is
particularly difficult to alter with the assurance of stability and so
this should not be done without good cause. Cases can be found
where transverse lower arch expansion has been stable, but this is
predictable and so is not sound basis for treatment.
Labiolingual movement of lower incisors is also liable to be
unstable unless other factors are changed at the same time. For
example, retraction of the lower incisors may be stable in a class III
case, if an adequate overbite is established. In a few class II cases, the
lower incisors have been restrained by contact with palate or upper
labial segment or by the thumb sucking habit and so proclination to
a position of true soft tissue balance will be stabled.
However, these changes in the lower incisor position are
problematic and have to be managed skillfully. Retraction of upper
incisors in class II division 1 case will be provided stability their
relationship to the lower lip is changed.
Occlusal Factor
Teeth that are retained by the occlusion will be stable, without
retention appliances. For example, instanding upper incisors that have
been moved over the bite will be provided stability that the overbite
is adequate. Similarly, a unilateral crossbite corrected by upper arch
expansion should be stable, if there is a good intercuspation of the
teeth. The occlusion is also important in maintaining a corrected
anteroposterior arch relationship.
Facial Growth and Occlusal Development

Dentoalveolar adaptation tends to maintain occlusal relationships,
even when skeletal relationship changes with growth. However,
if the intercuspation of the teeth is poor or if the dentoalveolar
compensation is already at its limit, occlusal changes are marked.
For example, a class III occlusion will often deteriorate, if the

underlying class III skeletal relationship becomes more severe
and a skeletal open bite often becomes worse with growth in lower
face height.
Supporting Tissues
In normal circumstances, transient variation in occlusal and
muscular forces will not result in tooth movement. However, when
a tooth has been moved by an orthodontic appliance, the recently
deposited bone is particularly susceptible to resorption. Thus relapse
can occur due to minor imbalances that would normally have no
effect. For this reasons it is prudent to retain most tooth movements
for a period of months until the supporting tissues have adapted
fully. The supporting bone and principal fibers of the periodontal
ligament will be reorganized within 3–6 months, but supra-alveolar
connective tissue takes very much longer. This can produce partial
relapse of rotations and of labial movement of instanding lateral
incisor teeth unless they are held by an overbite. Precision of the free
gingival and transseptal fibers following rotation helps to stabilize
the correction, although it does not eliminate the risk of relapse.
Relapse 4
Relapse is essential after active treatment to establish as perfect a state
of balance as possible and to maintain the teeth until all retrogressive
changes are eliminated or reduced to a minimum. It is essential that
the dentist has a board biological orientation—that he recognizes
not only the predominance of the morphogenetic pattern, but the
role played by the environment, by the functional forces and by the
effect of restorative work on the integrity of the dentition.
Basically, there are morphologic and biologic reasons for relapse.
To better understand the morphologic aspect, an analysis of tooth
movement itself is essential.
The foregoing would seem to imply that the tendency to relapse
is strongest when the tooth is moved quickly. In general, this is true
and rapidity of orthodontic correction is not necessarily a favorable
treatment objective. Indeed, it can enhance the tendency to return to
the original malocclusion.
In the final analysis, one of the important factors in preventing
relapse are the choice of the proper treatment philosophy and
appliance themselves. This means a careful diagnostic routine and
a constant evaluation of treatment progress. The orthodontist must
be willing at all time to reassess and changes treatment, if indicated.
To expand, to extract, to treat now, to treat later; these are important
decisions that must be made, but from a thorough assessment of all
diagnostic criteria.
Retainers
Types of Retainers
5
Retainers are used in orthodontics to hold teeth either actively or
passively. Active retainers are used to move teeth, while passive
retainers are commonly prescribed at the end of active orthodontic
treatment to provide adequate support for the teeth in the post-
treatment phase. They may be removable, fixed or a combination of
both (Table 5.1).
Table 5.1: Types of retainers
Removable retainers Fixed retainers
Hawley retainer Bonded flexible retainer
Wraparound retainer/clip-on Lower lingual bonded retainer
retainer
Non-acrylic removable retainer Active retainer
Positioner retainer Spring retainer
Essix retainer Activable retention technique
Functional appliance
Fixed Retainer
The fixed retainer provides a greater degree of support and control
than a removable retainer. While a removable retainer remains the
retainer of choice for the maxillary arch, fixed retainers are primarily
used to retain derotated teeth and periodontally-involved teeth. One
of the disadvantages of a fixed retainer is the hygienic problem of not
being able to floss or brush.
Retainers 15
Removable Retainers
Removable retainers on the other hand are generally easier to
maintain hygienically and provided greater freedom for later
modification in the case of relapse. But are easily lost or broken by
patient negligence.
Removable
Retainers
Hawley retainer
6
Hawley retainer is constructed with 0.7 mm wire. Flexibility depends
largely on the vertical height of the loops. However, sulcus depth is
limited and because the wire is heavy, these bows are very rigid in the
horizontal plane. Conversely, these are flexible in a vertical direction
and so the stability ratio is poor.
Hawley retainers of all types, classic and modified, remain the
most widely used retainers in orthodontic therapy. In addition to
their role in retention, these can be modified to achieve some limited
active tooth movement through the activation of the labial bow or
incorporation of auxiliary springs embedded into the acrylic base or
soldered to the labial bow or clamps (Figs 6.1A and B).
Hawley retainers can be used to achieve slightly individual tooth
movement. These are especially effective in overbite cases, since
the overbite correction can be maintained or even increased by
building a flat or slightly inclined shelf into the acrylic plate behind
the incisors.
Tweed advised that retainers should normally be worn for at least
5 years to ensure functional adaptation to orthodontic corrections.
Figs 6.1A and B: Removable retainer. A. Hawley retainer; B. After application.

Removable Retainers 17
Passive retainers are used:

1. To maintain the status quo within the dentition (e.g. space
maintainers and retaining appliance).
2. To disclude the dentition during orthodontic treatment.
3. To disclude the teeth prior to registration of bite relationships.
4. As an adjunction to the treatment of temporomandibular
dysfunction.
It is the most common retainer. It incorporates clasps on molar
teeth and characteristic outer bow with adjustment loops, spanning
from canine to canine.
The ability of this retainer to provide some tooth movement was a
particular asset with fully banded fixed appliances, since one function
of the retainer would close band spaces between the incisors. A
common modification of Hawley retainer for use in extraction cases
are bow soldered to the buccal section of Adams clasp on the first
molar, so the action of the bow helps hold the extraction site closed.
It is made of acrylic base with molar clasps and an anterior labial
bow with vertical adjustment loops located in the canine region. The
acrylic may completely cover the palatal mucosa or may be constructed
in a horseshoe shape contacting the palatal surface of teeth and some
of the palatal mucosa. The labial bow (0.508–0.914 mm diameter wire)
is constructed to contact the labial surface of the first premolars or
the first molars in maxillary teeth. This is a classic feature of a Hawley
retainer.
The labial bow crosses the occlusion distal to the canine; it has
a tendency to open spaces at the site, especially in cases where
treatment involved extraction of first premolars. In these instances,
a continuous labial bow that is soldered to the molar clasps or a
wrap-around bow that also acts as clasps should be considered. The
continuous wrap-around bow or a bow soldered to a circumferential
clasp has the advantage of having no wire passing over the occlusal
surface of the teeth and can be adjusted further to maintain closure
of any extraction site.
In another modification of the basic Hawley’s appliance, the
labial bow crosses the occlusal table distal to the lateral incisors and
utilizes a short distal extension soldered to the distal leg of the vertical
loop in order to control canine position. In most cases, replacing a
portion of labial bow with elastic across the incisor teeth is found
to be more acceptable to adult patient. However, what is gained in
esthetics is lost in incisor control.
Hawley retainers are usually worn 24 hours per day for the first
6 months following removal of therapeutic appliance. Exceptions to
the 24-hour constraint are for toothbrushing, swimming, physical
contact sports and eating.
Since Hawley type retainers are fabricated from acrylic, these
are easily modified to include acrylic teeth and thus are used as a
transitional partial denture prior to the construction of fixed and/or
removable partial denture prostheses.
Removal for eating creates the hazard that the appliance will be
thrown out, while wrapped in napkin; patient therefore have to be
admonished that their retainers belong either in their mouth or in
the retainer case.
Wrap-around retainer
A second major type of removable orthodontic retainer is the wrap-
around or clip-on retainer, which consists of plastic bar (usually
wire-reinforced) along the labial and lingual surfaces of the teeth.
It is made up of 0.7 mm stainless steel wire. A variant of the wrap-
around retainer, a canine-to-canine clip-on retainer, is widely used
in the lower anterior region (Figs 6.2A and B).
The wrap-around Hawley is often the clinicians’ alternative when
occlusal inferences exist with a traditional Hawley retainer. The
wrap-around design eliminates occlusal interferences or opening
interproximal contacts. This design is often the second choice
retention appliance due to the long span of the labial arch wire. The
great distance between supports leaves the labial wire susceptible
to distortions, if the patient uses the wire to remove the appliance.
Patients should be instructed to ‘scoop’ the appliance out from the
palate with their thumb or index finger.
Figs 6.2A and B: Wrap-around retainer. A. Wrap-around retainer made up of

plastic bar and stainless steel wire; B. Wrap-around retainer in lower anterior
region.
Figs 6.3A and B: Non-acrylic removable retainer. A. Appliance;

B. After application.
Non-Acrylic removable retainer

Removable appliances with an acrylic base may cause soft tissue
inflammation in patients who tend to accumulate plaque or are
hypersensitive to free monomer, especially when cold-curing acrylic
is used. A non-acrylic removable retainer is a simple, effective
alternative (Figs 6.3A and B).
A special appliance was designed to resolve the inflammation.
The non-acrylic removable retainer was constructed of heavy wire
(0.9 mm) adapted to the gingival palatal surfaces of the upper teeth.
Retention was gained with Adams clasp on the first molars and three-
quarter clasps on the first bicuspids.
Positioner appliance
Positioner appliance is employed in some practices. It could be
found in two forms; the preformed and the custom-made. It acts as a
wonderful interim appliance, bridging the span between the multiband
appliances and the conventional retainers. These appliances have been
available for many years in either rubber or plastic. Their efficacy has
never been suspect; the only questionable aspect is their dependence
upon the cooperation of the patient (Figs 6.4A and B).
Since the introduction of the positioner retainer by Kesling in
1945, various materials including rubber, thermoplastic vinyl and
resin have been described.
In 1977, a high elastic silicone elastomer made of polydimethyl
silicate was introduced. Although the common silicone elastomers
are biologically inert and have excellent mechanical properties, these
have not been widely used in orthodontic practices. Reasons may
Figs 6.4A and B: Positioner retainer. A. Tooth positioner; B. Application of

tooth positioner.
include the time and cost of fabrication, the uncertainty of clinical

performance and the need for patient cooperation.
This is another type of retainer that is frequently used. This is a
flexible splint made from synthetic rubber or plastic material into
which the patient bites.
Custom-made
Custom-made is fabricated on an articulated model in which the teeth
from both arches have been sectioned from their base, realigned and
waxed in an ideal configuration, thus incorporating minor correction
in tooth posture and occlusal inter-relation. It is then fabricated by
forming the rubber or elastomeric material around the teeth and
the coronal portion of the gingiva. When cured or set, the appliance
will have the ability to settle teeth and to achieve some limited tooth
movement because of its inherent elastic properties.
Preformed
Preformed types are available in different sizes and types for non-
extraction, for premolar extraction and maxillary premolar extraction
cases. The sizes are usually based on the sum of mesiodistal diameter
of the maxillary anterior teeth. These should be used only on
temporary basis, because these appliances cannot compensate for
individual variation in the size of the teeth, tooth size discrepancies
and variation in the width of the arch and form.
These appliances are worn nearly 24 hours per day as possible
for the first 2 days. After that, the appliances can be removed and
then wear for 4 hours per day plus during sleeping. For 4 hours
per day during the first 2 days then during the 4 working hours of
wear, the patient is requested to bite and clench into the appliance
for 20 seconds, release for 20 seconds and repeat. If the patient
follows this schedule, after the first 2–3 weeks, all movement that
might occur will have done so and the appliance will become a
true ‘passive’ retainer rather than an active appliance.
It is used for tooth positioning and enhancing the settling or
‘time tuning’. It also can stimulate and massage the gingiva during
the excessive aspect of their use.
It can maintain the occlusal relationship and interarch tooth
position. In patient that has a tendency toward class III relapse, a
positioner made with the jaws rotated somewhat downward and
backward may be useful. It is also clean, unlikely to be broken and
tends to stimulate tissue tone and works constantly toward the
improvement of tooth position.
The cost of fabrication is high because of the extensive laboratory
procedures and the time also being delayed because of the fabrication.
It lacks the ability to maintain the correction of rotated teeth. It is also
allowing the overbite to reassert itself. Its limited time of wear (since
the patient can neither eat nor talk with the positioner in place) and
the possibility that it may keep teeth loose by producing intermittent
forces contrary to natural muscle balance. It is contraindicated in
patient who has a tendency for blocked nasal airways.
It is bulky and can interrupt speech. The pattern of wear of a
positioner does not match the pattern that is usually derived for
retainers. Because of its bulkiness, patient often has difficulty in
wearing a positioner on a full-time basis. In fact, the positioner tends
to be worn less than the recommended 4 hours per day after the first
4 weeks. The preformed types have serious limitations unless one can
be found that fits the occlusion precisely, these may be ineffective
as retainers and may even induce tooth movement. In fabricating a
positioner, it is necessary to separate the teeth by 2–4 mm. This means
that an articulator mounting that records the patient’s hinge axis is
desirable. As a general guideline, the more the patients deviates from
the average normal and the longer the positioner to be worn, the
more important it is to obtain an individualized hinge axis mounting
an adjustable articulator for positioner construction.
Organic polymer wire for

esthetic maxillary retainers
Patients who have worn esthetic ceramic or plastic brackets
during orthodontic treatment are likely to want esthetic retainers
after treatment. Although fixed lingual mandibular retainers are
inconspicuous, the popular Hawley type maxillary retainers include
highly visible labial wires (Figs 6.5A and B).
An organic polymer maxillary retainer wire is made from 1.6 mm
diameter round polyethylene terephthalate. This material can be bent
with a plier, but will return to its original shape unless it is heat treated
for a few seconds at a temperature less than 230°C (melting point). In
prefabricating this QCM retainer wire, the anterior portion of the wire
and the ‘wave’ portion are heat treated at about 150°C immediately
after bending. The anterior portion is left flat to minimize patient
discomfort.
The organic polymer for esthetic maxillary retainer wire showed
a modulus of elasticity similar to that of the flat bow retainer wire.
After heat treatment, it displayed little deformation. The shrinkage
that occurs with heating allows the wire to fit more snugly to the cast
and the reduction in shrinkage of overall length can be compensated
for by extending the ‘waves’.
More was observed in the posterior portions of the wire than that
in the anterior portion. This is because the anterior segment and the
‘waves’ are initially heat treated at 150° to form the retainer.
The organic polymer wire retainer has highly desirable esthetic
characteristic and suitable physical properties. Patients who have
Figs 6.5A and B: Esthetic maxillary retainer. A. Organic polymer wires;

B. Application of maxillary retainer.
worn it to date have been entirely satisfied and hence more likely to
comply with long-term retention.
Wire bending is rarely necessary with the retainer. Since it is
shaped simply by pressing it tightly against the working cast, it
reduces laboratory construction time. The retainers can be made
entirely of this type of wire or with metal posterior segments. For
either type, a maxillary impression is taken and the cast is left to dry
at room temperature. If necessary, activation loops can be added or
spring can be welded to the metal wires.
Organic polymers are used in many orthodontic materials today
because of their esthetic qualities. This polymer can be join with a
metal at the posterior segments, because the polymer is too thick
and it is impossible to be used on terminal molars that have not fully
erupted or are out of occlusion at the end of active treatment.
Organic polymer wires generally have low elasticity and thus
these are easily deformed and do not exert sufficient force for tooth
movement and retention. If the wires are made with a high modulus
of elasticity, these become brittle. Organic polymers also discolor
because of their tendency to absorb liquids. These polymers are
made into wire are thicker than traditional retainers, which can make
it impossible to use on terminal molars that are not fully erupted or
are out of occlusion at the end of active treatment.
Invisible retainers
Invisible retainers usually last for many months to a few years. The
standard appliances made of wire and acrylic or of rubber usually last
for many years. Invisible retainer fits as accurately as the impression
and model permit. Usually, no adjustment needed (Figs 6.6A and B).
Occasionally, the periphery will require reduction for the
attachments of muscles. Heat guns can be used to join cracks,
separations or split areas in the plastic. Usually, it is preferable to
make a new appliance after considerable wear has occurred. The ease
of fabrication, the speed of insertion and almost complete lack of need
for adjustment have amazed all who have used these appliances. It is
usually easier to remake than to repair an invisible retainer.
Periodontists have found invisible retainers valuable for keeping
surgical packs in place with maximum comfort for the patient.
These appliances have been used successfully as splints to stabilize
traumatic and surgical fractures of the maxilla, premaxilla and
mandible until the bony fragments heal.
Figs 6.6A and B: Invisible retainer. A. Appliance; B. After application.
Webbing or folding of the appliance upon itself is a common

problem encountered in the use of these thermoformed materials.
Usually this fault comes from excessive temperature when the
appliance is being formed.
Essix Retainers
Essix retainers have nothing to adjust; the only thing that could be
done on a recall visit would be to check the patient’s compliance
and listen to any comments. Telephone supervision is a time- and
money-saving service to the patients and is sincerely appreciated.
Essix thermoplastic copolyester retainers change the rules of
permanent retention. Essix retainers are thinner, but stronger,
cuspid-to-cuspid version of the full arch, vacuum formed devices
(Figs 6.7A and B).
Advantages include:
1. The ability to supervise without office visit.
2. Absolute stability of the anterior teeth.
3. Durability and the ease of cleaning.
4. Low cost and ease of fabrication.
5. Minimal bulk and thickness (0.381 mm).
6. The brilliant appearance of the teeth caused by light reflection.
Since Essix retainers are placed only on the anterior teeth, these
were particularly monitored for signs and symptoms of open bite.
After hundreds of observations, there were few signs and a complete
absence of symptoms.
Figs 6.7A and B: Essix retainers. A. For both jaws; B. For single jaw.
This retainer has proven quite versatile. Their flexibility and

positioner effect makes them an alternative to spring retainers. These
also can serve as a temporary bridge and night guards for bruxism
and as bite planes to relieve bracket impingement until the bite can
be opened.
The use of Essix retainer in combination with telephone
monitoring opens the way to a practical, patient-friendly method of
true permanent retention.
Active
Retainers 7
‘Active retainers’ are contradictions in terms, since a device cannot
be actively moving teeth and at the same time, serving as a retainer.
It does happen, however that a relapse or growth changes after the
orthodontics treatment will lead to a need for some tooth movement
during retention. This is usually accomplished with a removable
appliance that continues as a retainer after it has repositioned the
teeth, hence the name. A typical Hawley retainer, if used initially to
close a small amount of band space, can be considered as an active
retainer. But the term is usually reserved for two specific situations;
realignment of irregular incisors and functional appliance (refer
Chapter 8, Functional Appliances) to manage class II or class III
relapse tendencies.
Realignment Of irregular incisors

Recrowding of lower incisors is the major indication for an active
retainer to correct incisor position. If late crowding has developed, it
is often necessary to reduce the interproximal width of lower incisors
before realigning them, so that the crowns do not tip labial into an
obviously unstable position. Not only does this approach reduce the
mesiodistal width of the incisors, decreasing the amount of space
required for their alignment but also it flattens the contact areas,
increasing the inherent stability of the arch in this region.
Spring Retainers
Spring retainers or spring aligners seem to offer the best of all worlds
combining some of the principles of Hawley type retainers with those
of the tooth positioners (Fig. 7.1A).
They utilize the same principles and procedures as those described
for positioners, aligning the incisor teeth on a working model and
Active Retainers 27
Figs 7.1A and B: Active retainers. A. Appliance; B. Spring retainer on a model.
fabricating an acrylic and wire spring to move the patient’s incisors

to that positions (Fig. 7.1B).
Many orthodontists use a spring retainer in conjunction with
proximal reduction to correct tooth size discrepancies where an
excess of mandibular tooth size exists. The proximal reduction ideally
should be performed prior to the fabrication of a working model.
A continuous piece of 0.711 mm diameter wire is contoured to
the labial and lingual surfaces of the incisors with vertical loops
overlaying the buccal and lingual surfaces of the canines similar in
design to the vertical loops of Hawley’s appliance. Acrylic is added on
the lingual and labial wire overlaying the four incisors and contoured
to follow the incisal edges occlusally and the gingival contour apically.
When placed in mouth, the retainer will ‘spring’ to engage slightly
malpositioned teeth and move them into the alignment established
on the working model. Because of the potential hazard of a patient
swallowing or even aspirating a spring retainer, many orthodontists
now use modified Hawley retainer. In this appliance, flanges extend
lingually to the distal of the first and second molars, and incorporated
an occlusal rest to prevent settling of the appliance. The flanges join
the lingual clip via the 0.711 mm wire and thus do not interfere with
the spring action of the appliance.
Removable Spring Retainers

Removable spring retainers can be used to correct rotations and
buccolingual malpositions. But it sometimes fails to position incisors
ideally no matter how well they are adjusted.
Activatable Retention technique

Activatable retention technique is a complementary to orthodontic
treatment. It should never be used to substitute an incomplete
treatment. They have the capacity to be constructed as inactive
retainers and in accordance with requirements of the corrected
malocclusion. They may be activated in cases where there is a
sporadic irregularity in some tooth or teeth.
Types of active retainers

Upper Retainer
The activatable upper retainer is basically in the upper incisor area.
It is built on the base of an acrylic palate, which supports a vestibular
arch, four lingual springs for upper incisors and two or four clasps of
Adams type (Figs 7.2A and B).
The vestibular arch is of 0.7 mm; caliber wire comes out from the
interproximal space between the canines and the first premolars
conforms to the gingival curve of the upper canine and comes down
to the middle third of the vestibular side of upper canine.
The vestibular arch bends distally at the interproximal space
between the upper lateral incisor and canine, reaching the distal
arm of the vestibular loops. It recurves over itself and touching the
afferent wire segment, runs toward mesial along the vestibular wall
of the canine and upper incisors, which it touches.
The recurved portion of the wire passing in front of the upper
canines has the effect of controlling the position of these teeth on the
vestibular side.
Figs 7.2A and B: Upper retainers. A. Metal parts making up the semiactive
retainer; B. Occlusal view of the finished semiactive upper retainer.
Active Retainers 29
On the lingual side, four lingual springs are made of 0.7 mm

round wire. The springs are passively placed in contact with lingual
wall of incisors, producing a passive retention effect and at the same
time are activable. This has the advantage of recovering the small
irregularities in the position that could appear in upper incisors. The
Adams clasp consists of 0.7 mm wire.
The acrylic body is made as thin as possible for comfort and a
hole is made in the middle part of the palate, at the level of canines
that acts as a reference and serves to encourage the instructions,
such as correct repositioning of the tongue, given to the patient in
case it is deemed necessary.
Lower Retainer
The activatable mandibular retainer is made up of two small acrylic
bodies that are to lingual of the first molars and support the ends of
the wires that shape the devices. The central body made of 1.1 mm
diameter wire, joining both sides of the retainer. The central body
starts at the occlusal fossa of the lower molar where it acts as an
occlusal stop. It has a bend toward gingival and descend along the
lingual sides of molar and 2 mm below the gingival border, bends to
the mesial and runs along the inner side 1.0 mm from the alveolar
mucosa, passing to the opposite side, then circles under the lingual
frenum, which it eludes with a ‘U’ bend and repeats the same course
to the counter lateral molar. The appliance is retained by two Adams
clasps that are made of 0.7 mm wire (Figs 7.3A and B).
Figs 7.3A and B: Lower retainers. A. Set of metal elements making up the
semiactive lower retainer; B. Occlusal view of the finished semiactive lower
retainer.
The activatable components are made of two arms whose ends

are embedded in the acrylic bodies of the molars and are projected
toward mesial, passing through the middle third of lingual side of the
premolars and contacting them. When these arms reach the distal
part of the canines, they recurve upon themselves and run toward
distal at a distance of one premolar and all along the recurved stretch;
both wires are in longitudinal contact.
In the interproximal space of both premolars, the wire descends
toward gingiva and shaping the tooth in wide, round loop, ascends
again toward the lingual side of the lower canine and in its middle
third, bends in a sharp angle toward mesial to run in a harmonious
curve along the lingual wall and above the cingulum of the lower
canines and incisors.
It is easy to make and repair, and possesses no hygienic problem.
Comfort of use makes it highly acceptable to patient.
Functional
Appliances
Andresen appliance
8
The principle action of these appliances is the dentoalveolar tooth
movement particularly of the upper incisors, often with favorable
change in the molar occlusion from class II to class I.
There are no specific requirements for retention following
Andresen appliance therapy and there is no need to construct formal
retainers. It is advisable, however to be cautious in the immediate
post-treatment period. When satisfactory tooth movement has been
achieved, it is wise to withdraw the appliance slowly over some
months by asking the patient to reduce wear by degrees, finishing
by wearing it only one or two nights per week. At this point the
appliance can be finally abandoned and suitable records taken to
monitor future changes (Fig. 8.1).
Activator
Activator is the most widely used derivatives of the Andresen’s original
appliance. Its role is to correct the incisor overjet and overbite and
the molar relationship during a period of active facial growth.
When the activator has been used alone then gradual reduction
in the hours of wear is the first step toward dispensing with the
appliance completely. If the
occlusal change has been
particularly rapid, it is wise to
continue retention on the nights
only basis until it is certain that
the growth spurt is completed.
It is also usual to remove the
occlusal shelves at this stage
so that the posterior teeth can
achieve full intercuspation.
When treatment is completed Fig. 8.1: Andresen appliance
with fixed appliances then the usual guidelines for post-treatment

retention can be adherent to (Fig. 8.2).
However, some class II or headgear force should again be
maintained until the growth spurt has been passed. If there is concern
that the lower labial segment has been proclined excessively, then
it is possible to ease the lingual acrylic away from the lower incisor
contact or indeed to remove this section completely.
A typical use for an activator as an active retainer would be a male
adolescent patient who had slipped back 2–3 mm toward a class
II relationship after early correction. If the patient is still growing
actively, it may be possible to recover the proper occlusal position
of the teeth. Differential anteroposterior growth is not necessary to
correct a small occlusal discrepancy tooth movement is adequate,
but some vertical growth is required to prevent downward and
backward rotation of the mandible. For all practical purposes, this
means that a functional appliance as an active retainer can be used
in teenagers, but is of no values in adults. Stimulating skeletal growth
with a device of this type simply does not happen in adults, at least to
a clinically useful extent.
The use of an activator as an active retainer differs somewhat from
its use to guide skeletal growth during the mixed dentition or when
it is used as a pure retainer. In the latter circumstances, the object
is to control growth and tooth movement is largely an undesirable
side effect. In contrast, an activator as an active retainer is expected
primarily to move teeth—no significant skeletal change is expected.
An activator as an active retainer is not indicated if more than 3
mm of occlusal correction is sought and over this distance, tooth
movement as a means of correction is a possibility. The correction
is achieved by restraining the eruption of maxillary teeth posteriorly
and directing the erupting mandibular teeth anteriorly.
The whole family of modified
activators designed to produce
tooth movement is most useful in
this active retention mode, not in
early mixed dentition treatment
where tooth movement for
the most part is undesirable.
On the other hand, the more
flexible a removable appliance
becomes the less suited it is
for the retention part of active Fig. 8.2: Activator appliance
Functional Appliances 33
Figs 8.3A and B: Bionator. A. After application; B. Appliance.
retention and the more likely it would be to require replacement with

another type of retainer when the occlusal relationship had been
reestablished. An activator or bionator with an acrylic framework
that contacts most teeth, therefore, is usually the best compromise
when this type of active retention is needed.
Bionator Appliance
Bionator appliance was developed in the 1950s by Balters, who
lay considerable stress on the importance of the tongue in the
development of open bites, and class II and class III malocclusions.
It is a light appliance with minimum bulk and as it is relatively easy
to speak with the appliance in the mouth, it can therefore be worn
virtually full time. The retention phase usually requires the removal
of all the occlusal shelves to allow full intercuspation of the posterior
teeth and a reduction in the hours of wear (Figs 8.3A and B).
Functional regulator
Functional regulator of Frankel is a flexible appliance, the design
of which is based upon rather different principles to the rigid
acrylic functional appliance.
Its originator claims that it is
an exercise appliance and that
by retraining the facial muscles
and the muscles of mastication
to occupy new positions, the
mandible and the maxilla will
be influenced to grow into
corrected positions (Fig. 8.4). Fig. 8.4: Frankel appliance
It does not require any modification to enter a retention period. All

that is required is for it to be worn for a reduced period of time. If this
is the sole method of treatment, it may be necessary to maintain part-
time wear until the maximum pubertal growth spurt has passed.
Frankel and Bionator type appliances have been used as dual-
arch retainers to prevent anteroposterior relapse, but these are less
predictable than single-arch retainers in maintaining intra-arch
stability.
Removable plastic Herbst retainer

Removable plastic Herbst retainer is full upper and lower plastic
splints function as conventional single-arch retainers (Fig. 8.5A).
At the same time, the removable splints are connected on each side
by the telescoping Herbst mechanism, which acts as a dual arch
anteroposterior retainer.
The feature of this retainer is the same as the Herbst appliance.
Upper and lower plastic splints are fabricated over a supporting wire
framework and connected by the Herbst mechanism (Fig. 8.5B).
The principle difference between the retainer and the treatment
appliance is that the retainer has full occlusal coverage on all teeth,
including the upper incisors. This maintains tooth positions and
prevents passive eruption.
If full-time wear is indicated, instruct the patient to remove
the retainer twice daily for brushing, flossing and fluoride mouth
rinsing. The appliance can be worn while eating, drinking, speaking
or sleeping. Part-time wear can also be prescribed.
It can also be used to replace a fixed appliance as a finishing
appliance if patient’s compliance with class II elastics, headgear,
Figs 8.5A and B: Herbst retainer. A. Upper and lower occlusal splints; B. After
application, connected by the Herbst mechanism.
Functional Appliances 35
diet or hygiene occasionally becomes unsatisfactory near the end of

treatment. It can be used as a retreatment appliance in cases that
have a tendency toward anteroposterior relapse. These patients can
benefit from retreatment with this retainer. The removable plastic
Herbst retainer may have an application as a postsurgical retainer
in preventing skeletal relapse. Early clinical trials suggest that this
appliance may be useful in protruding the lower jaw to maintain an
airway in patients who suffer from episodes of obstructive sleep apnea.
A form of the appliance has been used as an anterior repositioning
splint for treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder.
The effectiveness of removable plastic Herbst retainer as a
retreatment or finishing appliance in promoting skeletal changes
is probably limited to patients who have the potential to adapt
to orthopedic changes. Such adaptive ability can decrease with
advancing age. In the absence of this potential, changes resulting
from this appliance are probably dental rather than skeletal.
Fixed
Retainers
Introduction
9
The acid etch technique heralded a new era in dentistry, however, it was
some time before acid etching of enamel was applied in orthodontics.
The bonded fixed retainers consist of a length of orthodontic wire
bonded to the teeth with acid etch retained composite.
Bonded retainers
There is much variation in the design of bonded fixed retainers.
These include different wire types with differing diameters, different
composites, the use of mesh pads, intracoronal wire ligation with
composite placed over the wires, use of mesh alone with composite
and the use of resin fiberglass strips.
Types
Early bonded fixed retainers were made with plain, round or
rectangular orthodontic wire, but Zachrisson proposed the potential
advantages of the use of multi-stranded wire for their construction.
Artun and Zachrisson first described the clinical technique for the
use of a multi-strand wire canine-to-canine bonded fixed retainer. In
this retainer, the wire was bonded to the canine teeth only. In 1983,
Zachrisson reported the use of multi-stranded wire in a bonded fixed
retainer in which the wire was bonded to all the teeth, in the labial
segment.
Bonded fixed retainers using multi-strand wires can be further
divided into two different types:
1. Canine-to-canine bonded fixed retainer.
2. Flexible wire bonded fixed retainer.
In the former, a relatively rigid, large diameter multi-strand wire,
usually 0.8128 mm is bonded to the canines only. In the latter type,
Fixed Retainers 37
a smaller diameter multi-strand wire, usually 0.4445 mm or 0.5461

mm is bonded to each tooth in the labial segment. In this situation,
advantage is taken of the flexibility of this wire, in addition to the
surface roughness of the wire.
Third-Generation mandibular
bonded lingual 3–3 retainer
Since their introduction in 1977, direct bonded 3–3 retainers have
been used to improve the long-term stability of orthodontic treatment
results. Because of technological improvements, the design of the
retainer bar has changed over the years.
The first-generation retainer was a plain, round 0.8128–0.9144
mm wire with a loop at each end. In 1983, this design was replaced
by a twisted, 3-stranded 0.8128 mm wire. The second-generation
retainer did not have terminal loops, since adequate retention was
provided by the wire spirals and was thus, neater and easier to fit.
The introduction of miniature sandblaster enables the design of
the third-generation bonded retainer (Figs 9.1 and 9.2). It is consisted
Fig. 9.1: Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3–3 retainer

(SB, sandblasted end)
Fig. 9.2: Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3–3 retainer

(cemented in lower arch)
of a plain, round stainless steel wire of 0.762–0.8128 mm in

diameter, which is sandblasted at both ends (area to be bonded with
composite). Sandblasting provide a quick, inexpensive and simple
method of increasing the micromechanical retention surface.
Bonded Lingual Retainer

The multi-stranded flexible wire (0.381–0.508 mm), was useful to
prevent space reopening in different clinical situations. The twist
in the spiral wire gave undercut areas for mechanical retention and
the flexibility of the resilient wire was thought to allow physiologic
movement, during the period of retention.
The flexible spiral wire retainers (Figs 9.3A and B) were found to
be excellent in the following situations:
1. Closed median diastemas.
2. Spaced anterior teeth.
3. Adult cases with potential postorthodontic tooth migration.
4. Accidental loss of maxillary incisors, requiring the closure and
retention of large anterior spaces.
5. Space reopening, following mandibular incisor extractions.
6. Severely rotated maxillary incisors.
7. Palatally impacted canines.
The retainer is prefabricated of two mesh-backed attachment
bases, joined by a lingual bar with interbase lengths in four sizes
—20, 22, 24 and 26 mm. The attachment bases are constructed of a
stainless steel shield on a welded wire mesh and are joined to the
lingual bar with silver solder. The lingual bar may be constructed of
gold, brass or stainless steel, with a diameter range of 0.635–0.9144 mm
Figs 9.3A and B: Bonded lingual retainer. A. Upper arch; B. Lower arch.
Fixed Retainers 39
small gauge wire is preferable. The only drawback of using brass wire is
that, it may tarnish in patients with poor hygiene. The only drawback
to stainless steel is that, it takes more time and is more difficulty to
adjust. Both were used successfully on patients in this study. Gold
wire is probably the ideal wire for this retainer, since it is strong,
tarnish resistant, easy to adjust and a smaller, more comfortable
wire can be used. It was found that 0.8128 mm brass wire can resist
40 ounces of pulling force without distortion, while 0.7112 mm
gold wire can resist 52 ounces. In normal circumstances, 40 ounces
should be strong enough to retain mandibular incisors and resist the
force of mastication.
Retentive Staples
In this study, a staple (Figs 9.4A and B) is used to retain the teeth
after they have been moved together by orthodontic means. Cavity
is drilled in the proximal of the teeth (lingual or palatal) that is to be
used in the retention. It is formed by drilling a retention hole, using
a pin drill (2 mm in depth). A soft 0.6096 mm stainless steel wire in
the shape of a staple is placed into the two holes and cemented with
composite. This composite will both cement and cover the metal
color of the wire. Retentive staples are so placed that they will not
interfere with occlusal relations.
Resin Fiberglass Bonded Retainer

Three major problems exist with most bonded cuspid-to-cuspid
retainers—holding the lingual arch in position during bonding, adapting
the arch to the contours of the teeth and repairing a broken arch in
the mouth. The author developed a direct technique that solves these
Figs 9.4A and B: Retentive staples on upper arch. A. Before cementing;

B. After cementing with composite.
Fig. 9.5: Resin fiberglass retainer on lower arch
problems and takes 20 minutes or less, with no previsit preparation.

This system uses glass fibers from woven fiberglass fabric (Fig. 9.5).
These fibers are separated into 6 inch strips, sterilized with dry heat
and kept in inventory. The fiberglass strips are soaked in composite
and bonded to acid etched enamel. Although this technique has the
advantage of reducing the bulk of the retainer, it has the disadvantage
of creating a rigid splint, which limits physiologic tooth movement
and contributes to a higher failure rate.
Indications for Bonded Retainers

Bonded retainers are considered the following to be indications for
placement of a bonded canine-to-canine retainer:
1. Severe pretreatment of the lower incisor crowding or rotation.
2. Deliberate alteration in the lower intercanine width.
3. Following advancement of the lower incisors during active
treatment.
4. After non-extraction treatment in mildly crowded cases.
5. Following correction of deep overbite.
The main indications for the canine-to-canine retainer are related
to alteration of the anteroposterior or lateral position of the lower
labial segment during treatment.
Fixed orthodontic retainers are normally used in situations
where intra-arch instability is anticipated and prolonged retention is
planned. There are three major indications.
Maintenance of Lower Incisor Position During Late Growth

The major cause of lower incisor crowding in the late teen years is
late growth of the mandible in the normal growth pattern in both
patients who have undergone orthodontic treatment and those who
have not relapse into crowding, is almost, always accompanied by
Fixed Retainers 41
lingual tipping of the central and lateral incisors, in response to

the pattern of growth. An excellent retainer to hold these teeth in
alignment is a fixed lingual bar, attached only to the canines (or
to canines and first premolars) and resting against the flat lingual
surface of the lower incisors above the cingulum. This prevents
the incisors from moving lingually and is also reasonably effective
in maintaining correction of rotations in the incisor segment.
A fixed lingual canine-to-canine retainer can be fabricated with
bands on the canines or can be bonded to the lingual surface. Since
the labial part of a band, tends to trap plaque against the cervical part
of the labial surface, predisposing this area to decalcification and is
also unsightly, a bonded canine-to-canine retainer is preferred.
Diastema Maintenance
A second indication for a fixed retainer is a situation, where teeth
must be permanently or semi-permanently bonded together, to
maintain the closure of a space between them. This is encountered
most commonly, when a diastema between maxillary central incisors
has been closed. Even if a frenectomy has been carried out, there is
a tendency for a small space to open up between the upper central
incisors. Since this is unsightly, prolonged or permanent retention is
usually needed.
Maintenance of Pontic Space

A fixed retainer is also the best choice to maintain a space, where a
bridge pontic will eventually be placed. Using a fixed retainer for a
few months reduces mobility of the teeth and often makes it easier,
to place the fixed bridge that will serve among other functions, as
a permanent orthodontic retainer. If further periodontal therapy
is needed after the teeth have been positioned, several months or
even years can pass before a bridge is placed and a fixed retainer is
definitely required.
Prefabricated retainer (Figs 9.6A to C)

Techniques for Construction
of Bonded Retainers
Construction of a bonded fixed retainer might appear to be simple,
but if good long-term success is to be ensured, meticulous attention
Figs 9.6A to C: Retainers. A. Prefabricated retainer; B. Adjustable lingual

retainer; C. Modified retainer.
to detail is required. There are two techniques that are employed
to construct the bonded retainers; direct and indirect techniques
(Figs 9.7 to 9.11A to D).
Indirect Technique
The use of an indirect technique (refer Fig. 9.7) has been described to
simplify the clinical procedure. The wire is prepared on the model, an
inlay wax placed in the sites for the composite. A silicone impression
material is placed over this and allowed to set. The wax is removed with
boiling water. The teeth are prepared in the usual way and composite
is placed in the voids left by the wax. The impression is completed
with the retainer wire and composite is then placed over the teeth
and held firmly in position, until the composite has set.
This indirect technique can be modified by placing composite
directly on the model in place of the wax, allowing the composite to
set and then covering this with a vacuum-formed plastic sheet for
subsequent location of the retainer in the mouth. In this technique,
it is an unfilled resin-bonding agent that is then used to bond the
retainer to the enamel.
Fig. 9.7: Indirect technique, wire hold by inlay wax on upper model
Fixed Retainers 43
Direct Technique
The direct technique requires a length of wire to be prefabricated
to accurately fit a recent cast. Loops are not required at the ends of
the wire. The adaptation of the wire is checked clinically to ensure
Figs 9.8A and B: Initial procedures. A. Clinical aspect of the adequate

alignment of the teeth after removal of the fixed appliance; B. Brushing teeth
before bonding.
Figs 9.9A to D: Lingual retainer adaptation and positioning. A. Lingual retainer

fabricated from 0.7-mm stainless steel wire directly adjusts in patient’s mouth;
B. Composite resin increment placed on the stainless steel wire; C. Checking
position of the lingual retainer and resin increment placed on the lingual and
incisal surfaces of lower left central incisor without previous acid etching;
D. Light curing of the composite resin increment placed for holding the wire
in position.
Figs 9.10A to D: Lingual retainer fixation: A. Acid etching of the lingual surface
of the lower canines; B. Washing and drying of the acid etched surfaces;
C. Application of the adhesive system on the acid etched surfaces; D. Placement
of a composite resin increment on the left canine for definite bonding of the
lingual retainer.
that it locates passively, against all tooth surfaces to be retained.

Inadvertent activation of the multi-strand wire is a major concern
and is to be avoided. The teeth are subsequently pumiced and acid
etched as for direct bonding of orthodontic attachments. The wire is
then accurately located on the teeth. The wire is held in that position
by means of dental floss, orthodontic elastics, wire ligatures, wires
Figs 9.11A and B: Completion of lingual retainer fixation. A. Light curing of

the composite resin on the left canine; B. Light curing of the composite resin
on the right canine.
Fixed Retainers 45
Figs 9.11C and D: Completion of lingual retainer fixation (Contd...). C. Removal

of the fixation resin increment using an explorer; D. Aspect of the fixation resin
increment after removal. Note that the increment detached completely from
tooth surface.
tack welded to the retainer wire, localizing devices or fingers. The

composite can be shaped with an instrument dipped in unfilled
resin or alcohol, to produce the desired contour.
In vivo studies of bonded retainers

There are few reports in the literature on the long-term clinical
performance of bonded retainers. They will be considered under three
headings: reports on failure rate, failure type and reports on hygiene
effect.
Failure Rates
Failure rates for bonded retainers are reported to range from 10.3% to
47.0%. The failure rates are approximately twice as greater in maxilla as
the mandible and this is most likely because of occlusal factors. When
placing maxillary retainers, care must be taken to ensure the retainer
is free from occlusal trauma, to reduce the likelihood of failure.
Failure Type
Detachment at the wire/composite interface, is the failure type most
commonly observed. Both placements of insufficient adhesive and
material loss due to abrasion have been implicated in the detachment
of the wire, from the surface of the composite. Abrasive wear of the
composite has been reported in up to 62% of subjects in mandibular,
as well as maxillary retainers. The abrasion of mandibular retainers
has been attributed to mechanical forces such as tooth brushing

and chewing. With regard to the amount of adhesive used,
abrasion resistance should be taken into consideration and the
use of composites with greater abrasion resistance, may result in a
decreased observed failure rate.
Hygiene Status and Bonded Retainers

Bonded fixed retention is mechanically satisfactory method of long-
term retention. If these retainers are to be clinically acceptable for
long-term retention, it is important that there are no detrimental
effects on dental health.
Five studies have reported on the hygiene effects of bonded fixed
retainers. The observation periods of these studies vary considerably.
The shortest observation period is 4 months, whereas the longest
observation in any individual subject may be up to 103 months.
None of the reports found any evidence of increased periodontal
disease or enamel decalcification, in relation to lingual bonded
retainers. There was no evidence of greater plaque deposits on multi-
strand wire, when compared with round wire. Two cases have been
reported with surface enamel demineralization, after 2 years of using
labial bonded retainers, in the buccal segments.
Conclusion
In orthodontics, the patient may feel the treatment is complete
when the appliances are removed. But this is absolutely not true.
Orthodontic control on tooth position and occlusal relationships
must be withdrawn gradually, not abruptly, if excellent long-term
results are to be obtained. This is because, orthodontic treatment
results are potentially unstable and therefore retention is necessary.
In reality, retention should be the least troublesome aspect of
orthodontics, because there is simply not much to do. All that need to
be done is just a simple appliance to hold the teeth in position, until
the surrounding tissues have adapted to the new position of the teeth.
There are two most important factors that will affect retention:
responsibility and duration. The patient must have the responsibility
to maintain the retention appliance for good final result. The patient
must wear the appliance as prescribed, maintain the hygiene of the
appliance and oral surrounding and maintain follow-up appointment
Fixed Retainers 47
with the orthodontist. The consequences of non-compliance is

simply annoying, both to the orthodontist and the patient. Duration
of retention is also very important. The duration is according to the
severity of the pretreatment irregularities.
The use of various types of retainers is usually based on cases
that are going to be solved and the knowledge of the operator on
the available retainers. Each type of retainer is usually suitable for
various cases; from easy to most complicated one.
Removable retainer has many advantages like it is cheaper, easy
to handle—by patients and operators. In addition to that, removable
retainer is also more hygienic in a sense that it is easier to clean.
Despite of this, the removable retainer has its own disadvantages.
Patient’s poor compliance may become the major reason for relapse
to occur. On the other hand, a removable retainer will make the
patient comfortable and the result achieved at the end of treatment
will be most satisfactory, if patient gives full cooperation.
On the contrary, the major advantage provided by fixed retainer is,
it is compliance free—except with regard to oral hygiene procedure.
Fixed retainers also provide a good source of retention with less
bulkiness, as compared to the removable retainer. Despite of this, it
has a lot of downturn too. Two of its disadvantages are: its placement
procedure is very technique sensitive and time consuming. In
addition to that, plaque accumulation due to patient’s difficulty to
floss, is also a major disadvantage.
From the information that we gathered from this literature review,
we conclude that the removable retainers are more suitable in certain
cases, where limited retention is required and it is best accepted in the
maxillary arch. However, in cases where permanent or prolonged
retention is a must, a fixed retainer is still the best choice.
Bibliography
1. Andreasen GF, Chan KC. Conservative retention for spaced maxillary
central incisors. Am J Orthod. 1975;67(3):327-8.
2. Binder RE. Retention and post-treatment stability in adult dentition.
Dent Clin North Am. 1988;32(3):621-41.
3. Bjorn U Zachrisson. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing
of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:247-55.
4. Bjorn U Zachrisson. Important aspects of long-term stability. J Clin
Orthod. 1997-31(9):579-80.
5. Bjorn U Zachrisson. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3

retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29(1):39-48.
6. Brin L, Zilberman Y, Tennenhaus H. Non-acrylic removable retainer. J
Clin Orthod. 1984;18(9):641.
7. Chen RS. Prefabricated bonded mandibular retainer. J Clin Orthod.
1978;12(11):788-9.
8. Colin Melrose, Delcan T Millett. Toward a perspective on orthodontic
retention? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(5):507-14.
9. Cureton SL. Correction malaligned mandibular incisors with removable
retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1996;30(7):390-5.
10. David Russell Bearn. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(2):507-14.
11. Diamond M. Resin fiberglass bonded retainer. J Clin Orthod.
1987;21(3):182-3.
12. Donald RJ, Richard AR. Retention, Orthodontics: Current Principles
and Techniques. The CV Mosby Company; pp. 858-96.
13. Ferguson JW. Multistrand wire retainers: an indirect technique. Br J
Orthod. 1988;15(1):51-4.
14. Gazit E, Lieberman MA. An esthetic and effective retainer for lower
anterior teeth. Am J Orthod. 1976;70(1):91-3.
15. Houston, Tulley, Stephens. Retention and Stability, A Textbook of
Orthodontics; 1986. pp. 258-64.
16. Howe RP. Removable plastic Herbs, retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1987
21(8):533-7.
17. Isaacson KG, Reed RT, Stephens CD. The Appliances, Functional
Orthodontic Appliances, 1990. pp. 63-83.
18. Jose Carriere. Activatable Retention Technique, Inverse Anchorage
Technique in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment; pp. 217-22.
19. Lee RJ. The lower incisor bonded retainer in clinical practice: three year
study. Br J Orthod. 1981;8(1):15-18.
20. Ponitz RJ. Invisible retainer. Am J Orthod. 1971;59(3):266-72.
21. Proffit WR. Retention, Contemporary Orthodontics. The CV Mosby
Company; 1986. pp. 456-470.
22. Robert E Moyers. Orthodontic Techniques, Handbook of Orthodontics,
4th Edition. Chicago: Medical Book Publishers;1988. pp. 529-31.
23. Rosenstein SW, Jacobson BN. Retention: an equal partner. Am J Orthod.
1971;59(4):323-32.
24. Schwarz, Gratzinger. The Relapse and Prevention, Removable
Orthodontic Appliances; 1966. pp. 317-26.
25. Sheridan JJ, LeDoux W, McMinn R. Essix retainers: fabrication and
supervision for permanent retention. J Clin Orthod. 1993;27(1):37-45.
Fixed Retainers 49
26. Tondelli PM, Cuoghi OA, Pereira APL, et al. A practical method for
lingual retainer fixation before direct bonding: Clinical suggest.
Orthodontic Waves. 2009;68(4):185-8.
27. Watanabe M, Nakata S, Morishita T. Organic polymer wire for esthetic
maxillary retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1996;30(5):266-71.
index
Page numbers followed by f refer to figure
A Flexible wire bonded fixed retainer

Activator appliance 32f 36
Andresen appliance 31, 31f Frankel
appliance 33f
B functional regulator of 33
Bionator 33f types 36
appliance 33
Bonded flexible retainer 14 H
Bonded lingual retainer 38 Hawley’s
Bonded retainers 36 appliance 17
in vivo studies of 45 retainer 14, 16, 17
techniques for construction of types 36
41
types 36 L
Lingual retainer fixation 44f
C
completion of 44f, 45
Canine-to-canine bonded fixed Lower lingual bonded retainer 14
retainer 36
types 36
Closed median diastemas 38
types 36 M
Maxillary retainer, application of 22
D
types 36
Diastema maintenance 41
types 36 N
E Non-acrylic removable retainer 14,
19
Essix retainer 14, 24
types 36
Esthetic maxillary retainer 22
types 36 O
F Organic polymer wires 22
Facial growth 11 types 36
R modified 42f
Removable plastic Herbst retainer non-acrylic removable 19f
34 prefabricated 41, 42f
Resin fiberglass removable 16, 16f
bonded retainer 39 spring 14
retainer on lower arch 40f types of 3, 14
Retainers 2, 14, 42f wrap-around 14, 18
active 14 Retention
adjustable lingual 42f duration of 3
bonded lingual 38f medium-term 5
essix 25f permanent 5
esthetic maxillary 22f short-term 4
fixed 14, 36 types of 4, 5
Hawley 16f
Herbst 34f T
invisible 23, 24f Tooth positioner, application of 20f

Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual of

JAYPEE BROTHERS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (P) LTD

© 2014, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers

Inquiries for bulk sales may be solicited at: [email protected]

Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics

First Edition: 2014

Orthodontic treatment has experienced a wide acceptance within

Thierry Vuillemin Dr Med Dr Med Dent

I am delighted to write this Foreword to the Manual of Retainers in

Vijayalakshmi K mds Orthodontics

This Manual of Retainers in Orthodontics is an all-inclusive primer,

I am extremely happy to bring out my first book. I thank His Holiness

The type of retentive measures and the duration of their use

We have been able to define upright: perpendicular to the mandibular

Much has been said about changes in muscle balance established

Occlusal and Soft Tissue Factors

Facial Growth and Occlusal Development

For example, a class III occlusion will often deteriorate, if the

Figs 6.1A and B: Removable retainer. A. Hawley retainer; B. After application.

Passive retainers are used:

Figs 6.2A and B: Wrap-around retainer. A. Wrap-around retainer made up of

Figs 6.3A and B: Non-acrylic removable retainer. A. Appliance;

Non-Acrylic removable retainer

Figs 6.4A and B: Positioner retainer. A. Tooth positioner; B. Application of

include the time and cost of fabrication, the uncertainty of clinical

Organic polymer wire for

Figs 6.5A and B: Esthetic maxillary retainer. A. Organic polymer wires;

Figs 6.6A and B: Invisible retainer. A. Appliance; B. After application.

Webbing or folding of the appliance upon itself is a common

This retainer has proven quite versatile. Their flexibility and

Realignment Of irregular incisors

Figs 7.1A and B: Active retainers. A. Appliance; B. Spring retainer on a model.

fabricating an acrylic and wire spring to move the patient’s incisors

Removable Spring Retainers

Activatable Retention technique

Types of active retainers

On the lingual side, four lingual springs are made of 0.7 mm

The activatable components are made of two arms whose ends

with fixed appliances then the usual guidelines for post-treatment

Figs 8.3A and B: Bionator. A. After application; B. Appliance.

retention and the more likely it would be to require replacement with

It does not require any modification to enter a retention period. All

Removable plastic Herbst retainer

diet or hygiene occasionally becomes unsatisfactory near the end of

a smaller diameter multi-strand wire, usually 0.4445 mm or 0.5461

Fig. 9.1: Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3–3 retainer

Fig. 9.2: Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3–3 retainer

of a plain, round stainless steel wire of 0.762–0.8128 mm in

Bonded Lingual Retainer

Resin Fiberglass Bonded Retainer

Figs 9.4A and B: Retentive staples on upper arch. A. Before cementing;

Fig. 9.5: Resin fiberglass retainer on lower arch

problems and takes 20 minutes or less, with no previsit preparation.

Indications for Bonded Retainers

Maintenance of Lower Incisor Position During Late Growth

lingual tipping of the central and lateral incisors, in response to

Maintenance of Pontic Space

Prefabricated retainer (Figs 9.6A to C)

Figs 9.6A to C: Retainers. A. Prefabricated retainer; B. Adjustable lingual