Histamine and Antihistamines Histamin I Antihistam PDF
Histamine and Antihistamines Histamin I Antihistam PDF
Histamine and Antihistamines Histamin I Antihistam PDF
MEDICAE NAISSENSIS
Review article
3Doctor of Medicine
SUMMARY
In recent years, there has been a steady increase in the prevalence of allergic diseases. Allergic
immune response represents a complex network of cellular events involving numerous immune
cells and mediators. It represents the interaction of innate and acquired immune response. The key
role in the immune cascade is taken by histamine, a natural component of the body, which in the
allergic inflammatory response is releasesd by the mast cells and basophils. The aim of this study
was to highlight the role of histamine in allergic immunological events, their effect on Th1 and Th2
subpopulation of lymphocytes and the production of the corresponding cytokines, as well as the
role of histamine blockers in the treatment of these conditions.
Histamine achieves its effect by binding to the four types of its receptors, which are widely
distributed in the body. Histamine blockers block a numerous effects of histamine by binding to
these receptors. As a highly selective second-generation antihistamine, cetirizine not only achieves
its effects by binding to H1 receptors, but also attenuates numerous events during the inflammatory
process. Knowledge of the effects of histamine blockers, including cetirizine, may lead to the
selection of proper therapy for the treatment of allegic diseases.
Corresponding author:
Nikola Stojković
phone: +381643455599
e-mail: [email protected]
7
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
INTRODUCTION IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13) with strong inflows of
inflammatory granulocytes (eosinophils, basophils,
Over the last 30 years, the prevalence of allergic neutrophils and lymphocytes), except for eosinophils
diseases (asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis which have a particular role because they secrete
etc.) has been rapidly growing. The goal of treatment several substances that promote the chronic late-
of these conditions represents a blocking effect of phase inflammatory reaction. During the late phase of
histamine release from basophils and mast cells and is allergic inflammatory response, which is
considered to be the key cause of all the symptoms characterized by inflammation and tissue injury, there
associated with allergic inflammatory response. is a return of symptoms in the early stage.
Antihistamines are drugs that are widely used in Allergic diseases represent complex innate and
dealing with this type of disease. The aim of this adaptive immune responses to environmental
paper was to provide the insight into the mechanism antigens leading to inflammatory reactions with a T–
of allergic immune responses and highlight the helper-2 type cell and allergen-specific IgE
possibility of using histamine blockers, including predominance (3,4). Allergy is essentially an
cetirizine, a second generation antihistamine, in inflammatory disease. Our knowledge of the cells and
solving many problems in allergy caused by intracellular mediators that are involved in the allergic
communication and numerous mediators. inflammation has increased immensely during the
last decade. This knowledge provides the basis of a
more rational way for the development of therapeutic
ALLERGY principles and prevention of allergic symptoms. The
allergic inflammation involves a large number of cells.
An immune cascade of allergic conditions is However, three types of cells seem to be of particular
the interactions between numerous cell types and importance. These are the eosinophil granulocyte, the
inflammatory mediators (1). Allergic inflammatory mast cell and the T-lymphocyte of the Th2-type. The
response has three distinct phases: sensitization, cytokines and other molecules and the cells present in
early-phase responses and late-phase responses. The the microenvironment are the main factors which
sensitization phase begins with the production of determine differentiation of naive T cells into distinct
allergen-specific IgE-antibodies that bind to the subsets such as Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17 and Th22 type
surfaces of mast cells, basophils and antigen memory and effector cells (5). In conditions of allergic
presentation cells (APC), causing degranulation and diseases, effector Th2 cells produce not only
subsequent mediator release. Just before that occurs a traditional Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and
differentiation and clonal expansion of allergen- IL-13 (6,7), but also novel cytokines such as IL-25, IL-
specific CD4+Th2 cells, with the capability of 31 and IL-33 which have proinflammatory functions
producing IL-4 and IL-13, which are the key events in (8-14). These cytokines induce eosinophilia, mucus
induction of IgE. Engagement of IgE on effector cells production, producing of allergen-specific IgE and the
leads to sensitization of patients to specific allergen recruitment of inflammatory cells to inflamed tissues.
(2). At the early stage of the reaction from the mast Th2 cells are the leader of the process. The main
cells and basophils are released many inflammatory effector cells are the eosinophils and mast cells.
mediators such as tryptase, eosinophil chemotactic Predominance of Th2 cells might be caused by an
factor in addition to histamine as well as newly increased tendency to activate induced cell death of
synthesized molecules (PGD2, LCT4, bradykinin). The high IFN-gama producing Th1 cells as it is commonly
process of secretion of these mediators is crucial observed in patients with atopic disorders (15). Th1
characteristic of the early stages of the response. cells induce apoptosis of keratinocytes in atopic
About half of all patients who exhibit an early-phase dermatitis and epithelial cells and/or smooth muscle
allergic response experience a late phase cells in asthma in the effector phase of these allergic
inflammatory reaction approximately 4-24 hours diseases (16-20). As the major consequences of the
following allergen exposure. Late phase response is activation of mast cells, the release of histamine and
manifested by activation of endothelial cells and other mediators occur, which leads to acute allergic
secretion of many inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, reaction. Activation of eosinophils lead to the
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, extracellular release of a number of potent cytotoxic
proteins. These proteins play a very important role in This treatment shows varying degrees of
the development of subacute and chronic symptoms success and there are many reasons for this
of allergy. Macrophages, epithelial cells, neutrophil variability. One of the very important reasons for this
granulocytes and endothelial cells also play an may be the fact that we are not seeing the mechanisms
important role in allergic diseases. Antigen-induced that underlie the individuality of the patient. It is clear
immunological cascade is presented in Figure 1. that there are large differences in terms of
Treatment of allergic diseases still has stereotyped inflammatory cells and mediators that are crucial for
character and consists of international and national allergic diseases.
recommendations.
Figure 1: The allergic cascade. Mast cell mediators, including cytokines, cause degranulation and contribute to
the bidirectional messaging with other inflamatory cells or their precursors, leading to lymphocyte activity,
and migration of immune cells to inflamatory sites (21) (source: Canonica GW, Blaiss M. Antihistaminic, anti-
inflammatory, and antiallergic properties of the nonsedating second-generation antihistamine desloratadine: a
review of the evidence. World Allergy Organ J 2011;4(2):47-53.)
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
Table 1. Histamine receptors, the localization of their expression and mechanism of action (53) (source: Akdis
CA, Simons FER. Histamine receptors are hot in immunopharmacology. Eur J Pharmacol 2006; 533:69-76.)
11
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
and pharmacodynamics characteristics is important for patients belonging to extreme age groups, pregnant
the correct usage of such drugs, particularly in women, or subjects with concomitant diseases.
Figure 2: Drugs of the first and second generation of antihistamines (61) (source: Simons FER, Simons KJ.
The pharmacology and use of H1-receptor antagonist drugs. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1663-1670)
After oral application, most antihistamines cytohrome system performs metabolization and
show a good degree of absorption. The effective detoxification of most antihistamines. Only acrivastine,
concentration of antihistamines is achieved three levocetirizine, desloratadine and fexofenadine (62)
hours after application, which confirms the above avoid this metabolic passage through the liver to an
thesis. These molecules have the characteristic of important degree, which makes them more predictable
liposolubility, which enables them to pass through in terms of their desirable and undesirable effects.
cell membranes with extreme ease. Concomitant Fexofenadine is eliminated in stool, while cetirizine and
administration with food can change the plasma levocetirizine are eliminated in urine. Fexofenadine is
concentrations of these drugs, which can be eliminated without metabolic changes while cetirizine
explained by the presence of P glycoprotein across and levocetirizine are eliminated in unaltered form.
cell membranes and the organic anion transporter Other antihistamines undergo the transformation in
polypeptides. These proteins function as active the liver, thereby resulting in metabolites which may
transport systems for other molecules, showing be active or inactive. Their concentrations in plasma
affinity for them. Antihistamine shows a good depend on the activity of the P450 enzyme system.
degree of binding to plasma proteins (78% to 99%). Metabolism of antihistamines and drug interaction are
The group of enzymes belonging to the P450 given in Table 2.
13
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
Table 2:Antihistamines, their metabolism and interaction with other drugs (63) (modified from del Cuvillo A,
Mullol J, Bartra J, Davila I et al. Comparative pharmacology of the H1 antihistamines.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006; 16(1):3-12.)
Generation of
Drug Liver metabolization Drug interactions
antihistamines
Chlorpheniramine
Yes Possible
Diphenhydramine
Yes Possible
First Doxepin
Yes Possible
Hydroxyzine
Yes Possible
Acrivastine <50%
Cetirizine <40% -
Loratadine Yes -
Ebastine Yes -
Second Fexofenadine <8% Possible
Mizolastine Yes Yes (P glycoprotein)
Levocetirizine <15% Possible
Desloratadine Yes -
Rupatadine Yes
14
the body, although it does not pass the blood-brain particular, it highlights the role of fibroblasts in the
barrier easily. 70% of the cetirizine is eliminated via respiratory system, where they play an important
urine, and about 10% through the digestive tract in role in allergic and inflammatory diseases of the
the feces. This H1 antagonist has a low degree of respiratory system, not only in the formation of
interaction with other drugs, since it avoids the fibrosis, because they have the ability to respond to
metabolic pathway through the liver. Th2 cytokines. Cetirizine may have a very significant
The consensus of the British Society for antifibrotic effect for its ability to reduce the level of
Allergology and Clinical Immunology confirmed the profibrotic cytokine, transforming growth factor beta
anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory properties of (TGF-β), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and IL-6 (99).
cetirizine in vitro and in vivo. Antihistamine agents It has been shown that the fibroblasts of the airways
such as cetirizine do not act only through H1 have functional receptors for IL-4 and IL-13.
receptors, but may attenuate many events during the Numerous studies have shown that cetirizine results
inflammatory process. Cetirizine shows some in a reduction of the expression of CD54 induced by
modulation effects on the inflammatory response. It IFN-γ.
leads to reduction of the migration of eosinophils
that is induced by inflammatory mediators in atopic
and nonatopic individuals (78-87). In addition to the CONCLUSION
classic role in antagonizing the H1 receptor,
cetirizine induces reduction of the expression of Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the
adhesion molecules associated with the migration of allergic reaction, records a constant growth and tells
eosinophils and eosinophil cells in in vitro studies us about the complex network of cells and
(88-90) and in atopic patients (91-94), so that the mediators, which are at the core of allergic
recipients and the effect of cetirizine consists of the inflammatory response. Through its receptors,
inhibition of eosinophil infiltration into tissues. It has histamine as an important chemical messenger plays
a lipophilic and ionizing properties enabling it to act an important role in the physiological response,
directly on the cell membrane leading to its including neurotransmission, allergic inflammation
stabilization. Cetirizine inhibits binding of NF-kB, and immunomodulation. Drugs that have the
inhibits the expression of adhesion molecules histamine receptors as target for their activity can be
(ICAM-1) on immune cells and endothelial cells. It considered as a very good choice for the treatment of
also inhibits migration of inhibitory factor (MIF) (95) allergic conditions. Pharmacodynamic and
as well as the production of IL-8, and leukotriene B4 pharmacokinetic differences between the first and
production of two very potent chemoattractans. second generation of antihistaminics should be well
Cetirizine leads to the release of PGE2, suppressors known, because it can help when choosing the right
of expression of antigen and presentation of MHC drug. Cetirizine is a potent second-generation
class II on monocytes and reducing macrophages antihistamine which shows remarkable
(96), reducing the chemotaxis of monocytes and T immunoregulatory properties. It influences the
lymphocytes (97). Cetirizine reduces the number of interaction of mediator cells with all systems. It
tryptase-positive mast cells at sites of inflammation affects the interaction of eosinophils, mast cells and
(98). An increasing number of data points to the fibroblasts and thus may participate in the
importance of fibroblasts in many organs. In regulation of the internal environment
References
15
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
3. Akdis CA. Allergy and hypersensitivity: 13. Kakkar R, Lee RT. The IL-33/ST2 pathway:
mechanisms of allergic disease. Curr Opin therapeutic target and novel biomarker. Nat Rev
Immunol 2006; 18(6):718-26. Drug Discov 2008; 7(10):827-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2006.09.016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd2660
4. Akdis M, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of allergen- 14. Liew FY, Pitman NI, McInnes IB. Disease-
specific immunotherapy. J Allergy ClinImmunol associated functions of IL-33: the new kid in the
2007; 119(4):780-91. IL-1 family. Nat Rev Immunol 2010; 10(2):103-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2692
5. Akdis M,Burgler S, Crameri R et al. Interleukins, 15. Akkoc T, de Koning PJ, Ruckert B et al. Increased
from 1 to 37, and interferon-gamma: Receptors, activation-induced cell death of high IFN-gamma-
functions, and roles in diseases. J Allergy producing T(H)1 cells as a mechanism of T(H)2
ClinImmunol 2011; 127(3):701-21, e70. predominance in atopic diseases. J Allergy Clin
6. Akkoc T, Akdis M, Akdis CA: Update in the Immunol 2008; 121(3):652-8, e1.
mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotheraphy. 16. Meyer N, Zimmermann M, Burgler S et al. IL-32 is
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2011; 3(1):11-20. expressed by human primary keratinocytes and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2006.06.003 modulates keratinocyte apoptosis in atopic
7. Akdis M: Healthy immune response to dermatitis. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2010; 125(4):858-
allergens.T regulatory cells and more.Curr Opin 65, e10.
Immunol 2006; 18(6):738-44. 17. Solarewicz-Madejek K,Basinski TM Crameri R et
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2006.06.003 al. T cells and eosinophils in bronchial smooth
muscle cell death in asthma. ClinExp Allergy
8. Iwakura Y,Ishigame H, Saijo S, Nakae S.
2009; 39(6):845-55.
Functional specialization of interleukin-17 family
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03244.x
members. Immunity 2011; 34(2):149-62.
18. Trautmann A, Akdis M, Kleemann D et al. T cell-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.012
mediated Fas-induced keratinocyte apoptosis
9. Wang YH, Angkasekwinai P, Lu N et al. IL-25 plays a key pathogenetic role in eczematous
augments type 2 immune responses by enhancing dermatitis. J Clin Invest 2000; 106(1):25-35.
the expansion and functions of TSLP-DC- http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI9199
activated Th2 memory cells. J Exp Med 2007;
19. Trautmann A, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Kruger K
204(8):1837-47.
et al. T cells and eosinophils cooperate in the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070406
induction of bronchial epithelial cell apoptosis in
10. Goswami S,Angkasekwinai P, Shan M et al. asthma. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2002; 109(2):329-
Divergent functions for airway epithelial matrix 37.
metalloproteinase 7 and retinoic acid in http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.121460
experimental asthma. Nat Immunol 2009;
20. Zimmermann M, Koreck A, Basinski T et al. TNF-
10(5):496-503.
like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1719
TNF-alpha cooperate in the induction of
11. Bilsborough J, Leung DY, Maurer M et al. IL-31 is keratinocyte apoptosis. J Allergy ClinImmunol
associated with cutaneous lymphocyte antigen- 2011; 127(1):200-7, 207 e1-10.
positive skin homing T cells in patients with
21. Canonica GW, Blaiss M. Antihistaminic, anti-
atopic dermatitis. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2006;
inflammatory, and antiallergic properties of the
117(2):418-25.
nonsedating second-generation antihistamine
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.10.046
desloratadine: a review of the evidence. World
12. Dillon SR, Sprecher C, Hammond A et al. Allergy Organ J. 2011;4(2):47-53.
Interleukin 31, a cytokine produced by activated T http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182093e19
cells, induces dermatitis in mice. Nat Immunol
2004; 5(7):752-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni1084
16
22. Haas H, Panula P. The role of histamine and the 30. Johnson HH Jr, DeOreo GA, Lascheid WP,
tuberomamillary nucleus in the nervoussystem. Mitchell F. Skin histamine levels in chronic atopic
Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:121-30. dermatitis. J. Invest.Dermatol. 1960; 34:237–8
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1034 (1960).
23. Yokoyama H. The role of central histaminergic 31. Juhlin L. Localization and content of histamine in
neuron system as an anticonvulsive mechanism in normal and diseased skin. ActaDerm.Venereal.
developing brain. Brain Dev 2001; 23:542-7. 1967; 47: 383–91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0387-7604(01)00261-3 32. Greaves MW, Soendergaard J. Urticariapigmentosa
24. Broid DH, Gleich GJ, Cuomo AJ et al. Evidence of and factitious urticaria. Arch Dermatol. 1970;101:
ongoing mast cell and eosinophil degranulation in 418–25.
symptomatic asthma airway. J Allergy Clin http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1970.04000040
Immunol 1991; 88: 637– 48. 040009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(91)90158-K 33. Kaplan AP, Horakova Z, Katz SI. Assessment of
25. Casale TB, Wood D, Richerson HB et al. Elevated tissue fluid histamine levels in patients with
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid histamine levels in urticaria. J. Allergy Clin.Immunol. 1978; 61:350–4.
allergic asthmatics are associated with http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(78)90113-6
methacholine bronchial hyperresponsiveness. J 34. Tuomisto L, Kilpelainen H, Riekkinen P.
Clin Invest. 1987; 79:1197–203. Histamine and histamine‑N‑methyltransferase in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI112937 the CSF of patients with multiple sclerosis. Agents
26. Jarjour NN, Calhoun WJ, Schwartz LB, Busse Actions 1983; 13:255–7.
WW. Elevated bronchoalveolar lavage fluid http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01967346
histamine levels in allergic asthmatics are 35. Petersen LJ, Hansen U, Kristensen JK et al. Studies
associated with increased airway obstruction. Am. on mast cells and histamine release in psoriasis:
Rev.Respir. Dis.1991; 144: 83–7. the effect of ranitidine. ActaDerm.Venereol. 1998;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/144.1.83 78:190–3.
27. Liu MC, Bleecker ER, Lichtenstein LM et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000155598441503
Evidence for elevated levels of histamine, 36. Frewin DB, Cleland LG, Jonsson, JR, Robertson
prostaglandin D2, and other bronchoconstricting PW. Histamine levels in human synovial fluid.
prostaglandins in the airways of subjects with J.Rheumatol.1986; 13:13–4.
mild asthma. Am. Rev.Resp. Dis.1990; 142:126–32.
37. Crisp AJ. Studies of histamine in the rheumatoid
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/142.1.126
joint.Rheumatol.Int. 1984; 4:125–8 (1984).
28. Wardlaw AJ, Dunnette S, Gleich GJ et al.
38. Akdis CA, Blaser K. Histamine in the immune
Eosinophils and mast cells in bronchoalveolar
regulation of allergic inflammation. J Allergy
lavage in subjects with mild asthma. Relationship
ClinImmunol 2003; 112:15-22.
to bronchial hyperreactivity.Am. Rev.Respir. Dis.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mai.2003.1585
1988; 137: 62–9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/137.1.62 39. MacGlashan D Jr. Histamine: a mediator of
inflammation. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2003;
29. Wenzel SE, Fowler AA 3rd, Schwartz LB.
112:Suppl 4:53-9.
Activation of pulmonary mast cells by
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(03)01877-3
bronchoalveolar allergen challenge. In vivo
release of histamine and tryptase in atopic 40. Schneider E, Rolli-Derkinderen M, Arock M, Dy
subjects with and without asthma.Am. M. Trends in histamine research: new functions
Rev.Respir. Dis.1988; 137:1002– 8. during immune responses and hematopoiesis.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1002 Trends Immunol 2002;23:255-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02215-9
17
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
41. Le Coniat M, Traiffort E, Ruat M et al. 51. Bakker RA, Wieland K, Timmerman H, Leurs R.
Chromosomal localization of the human Constitutive activity of the histamine H(1)
histamine H1-receptor gene. Hum Genet receptor reveals inverse agonism of histamine H1
1994;94:186-8. receptor antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00202867 2000;387:R5–R7.
42. Gantz I, Schaffer M, DelValle J, et al. Molecular http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00803-1
cloning of a gene encoding the histamine H2 52. Labella FS, Brandes LJ. Interaction of histamine
receptor. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 1991;88:429-33. and other bio-amines with cytochromes P450:
[Erratum, ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 1991;88:5937.] implications for cell growth modulation and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.13.5937a chemopotentiation by drugs. Semin. Cancer
43. Oda T, Morikawa N, Saito Y et al. Molecular Biol2000; 10:47–53.
cloning and characterization of a novel type of http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/scbi.2000.0307
histamine receptor preferentially expressed in 53. Akdis CA, Simons FER. Histamine receptors are
leukocytes. J BiolChem 2000;275:36781-6. hot in immunopharmacology. Eur J Pharmacol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006480200 2006; 533:69-76.
44. Lovenberg TW, Roland BL, Wilson SJ et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.044
Cloning and functional expression of the human 54. Schmelz M, Schmidt R, Bickel A et al. Specific C-
histamine H3 receptor. Mol Pharmacol receptors for itch in human skin.J Neurosci 1997;
1999;55:1101-7. 17:8003-8.
45. Bakker RA, Schoonus SB, Smit MJ et al. Histamine 55. Spitaler MM, Hammer A, Malli R, Graier WF.
H1-receptor activation of nuclear factor-kappa B: Functional analysis of histamine receptor
roles for G beta gamma- and G alpha(q/11)- subtypes involved in endotheliummediated
subunits in constitutive and agonist-mediated relaxation of the human uterine artery.
signaling. MolPharmacol 2001;60:1133-42. ClinExpPharmacolPhysiol 2002;29: 711-6.
46. Arrang JM, Garbarg M, Schwartz JC et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03704.x
Autoinhibition of brain histamine release 56. Sugimoto Y, Iba Y, Nakamura Y et al. Pruritus-
mediated by a novel class (H3) of histamine associated response mediated by cutaneous H3
receptor. Nature 1983; 302:832–7. receptors. ClinExp Allergy 2004;34:456-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/302832a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01876.x
47. Hall IP. Pharmacogenetics of asthma.EurRespir J 57. McLeod RL, Mingo GG, Herczku C, et al.
2000;15:449-51. Combined histamine H1 and H3 receptor
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15.04.x blockade produces nasal decongestion in an
48.Banu Y, Watanabe T. Augmentation of antigen experimental model of nasal congestion. Am J
receptor-mediated responses by histamine H1 Rhinol 1999;13:391-9.
receptor signaling. J Exp Med 1999;189:673-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/105065899781367483
50. Leurs R, Church MK, Taglialatela M. H1- 59. Jutel M, Watanabe T, Akdis M et al.Immune
antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti-inflammatory regulation by histamine.Curr.Opin.Immunol.2002;
actions and cardiac effects. ClinExp Allergy. 14, 735-740.
2002;32:489– 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0952-7915(02)00395-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0954-7894.2002.01314.x
18
19
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
84. van Steekelenburg J, Clement PA, Beel MH. 92. Campbell A, Chanal I, Czarlewski W et al.
Comparison of five new antihistamines (H1- Reduction of soluble ICAM-1 levels in nasal
receptor antagonists) in patients with allergic secretion by H1-blockers in seasonal allergic
rhinitis using nasal provocation studies and skin rhinitis. Allergy 1997; 52 (10): 1022-5.
tests. Allergy 2002; 57 (4): 346-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02425.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.1s3426.x 93. Fasce L, Ciprandi G, Pronzato C et al. Cetirizine
85. Okada C, Eda R, Miyagawa H, et al. Effect of reduces ICAM-I on epithelial cells during nasal
cetirizine on human eosinophil superoxide minimal persistent inflammation in asymptomatic
generation, eosinophil chemotaxis and eosinophil children with mite-allergic asthma. Int Arch
peroxidase in vitro. Int Arch Allergy Immunol Allergy Immunol 1996; 109 (3): 272-6.
1994; 103 (4): 384-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000237249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000236658 94. Boone M, Lespagnard L, Renard N et al. Adhesion
86. Michel L, De Vos C, Dubertret L. Cetirizine effects molecule profiles in atopic dermatitis vs. allergic
on the cutaneous allergic reaction in humans. Ann contact dermatitis: pharmacological modulation
Allergy 1990; 65 (6): 512-6 by cetirizine. J EurAcadDermatolVenereol 2000;
87. Michel L, De Vos C, Rihoux JP, et al. Inhibitory 14 (4): 263-6.
effect of oral cetirizine on in vivo antigen-induced http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00017.x
histamine and PAF-acether release and eosinophil 95. 9Bennion SD, Middleton MH, David-Bajar KM et
recruitment in human skin. J Allergy al. In three types of interface dermatitis, different
ClinImmunol 1988; 82 (1): 101-9. patterns of expression of intercellular adhesion
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(88)90058-9 molecule-1 (ICAM-1) indicate different triggers of
88. Mincarini M, Cagnoni F, Canonica GW et al. disease. J Invest Dermatol 1995: 105 (1 Suppl.): 71–
Quantitative flow cytometric analysis of the 9.
effects of cetirizine on the expression of ICAM- 96. Shimizu T, Nishihira J, Watanabe H et al.
1/CD54 on primary cultured nasal cells. Allergy Cetirizine, an H1-receptor antagonist, supresses
2000; 55 (3): 226-31. the expression of macrophage migration
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00213.x inhibitory factor: its potential anti-inflammatory
action. ClinExp Allergy. 2004;34 (1): 103–9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01836.x
20
97. Namazi MR. Cetirizine and allopurinol as novel 99. Hemmati AA, Mikaili P, Khodayar MJ et al. The
weapons against autoimmune disorders. J protective effect of Cetirizine against Bleomycine
IntImmunopharmacol 2004: 4 (3): 349– 53. induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats. Pak J Med Sci
98. Pestelli E, Caproni M, Giomi B et al. Cetirizine 2008: 24 (6): 813–20.
reduces the number of tryptase-positive mast cells
in psoriatic patients: a double-blind controlled
study. Int J Tissue React 2001: 23(3): 97–103.
21
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/23/15 8:49 AM
Review article
Histamin i antihistamini
Nikola Stojković1, Snežana Cekić2, Milica Ristov3, Marko Ristić1, Davor Đukić1, Maša Binić1,
DraganVirijević1
SAŽETAK
Poslednjih godina beleži se kontinuirani rast prevalencije alergijskih oboljenja. Alergijski imunski
odgovor predstavlja jednu kompleksnu mrežu ćelijskih događaja u kojoj učestvuju mnogobrojne imunske
ćelije i medijatori. On predstavlja interakciju urođenog i stečenog imunskog odgovora. Ključnu ulogu u
imunološkoj kaskadi zauzima histamin, prirodni sastojak tela, koga u alergijskom inflamatornom odgovoru
oslobađaju mastociti i bazofili. Cilj ovog rada bio je naglasiti ulogu histamina u alergijskim imunološkim
događajima, njegov efekat na Th1 i Th2 subpopulaciju limfocita i produkciju odgovarajućih citokina, kao i
ulogu blokatora histamina u tretmanu ovih stanja. Histamin ostvaruje svoj efekat vezivanjem za četiri tipa
svojih receptora koji su široko distribuirani u organizmu. Blokatori histamina blokiraju mnogobrojne efekte
histamina vezivanjem za ove receptore. Cetirizin, visoko selektivni antihistaminik druge generacije, ne
ostvaruje svoje efekte samo vezivanjem za H1 receptore već dovodi do atenuisanja mnogobrojnih zbivanja
tokom inflamacijskog procesa. Dobro poznavanje efekata histaminskih blokatora, među njima i cetirizina,
može dovesti do pravog odabira terapije u tretmanu alergijskih oboljenja.
22