Raju Final
Raju Final
Raju Final
SEMINAR REPORT
ON
Submitted By
j.raju 07H61A0818
Department
of Chemical Engineering
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
HYDERABAD
2007-2011
\1
CERTIFICATE
CONTENTS
\2
ABSTRACT
DEFINITION
CLASSIFICATION
EXPLANATION
SOURCES AND CHARACTERISTICS
EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENT
CONTROL TECHNIQUES
CONCLISION
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT:-
\3
The source and characteristic of pollutants in petrolium and
petro chemical indusssssssss
Classification of pollutants:-
\4
Pollutants
1. Primary pollutants:
These pollutants emitted directly from identifiable sources.
2. Secondary pollutants:
These pollutants produce in the air by interaction among to or from primary
pollutants or by reaction with normal atmosphere constituents.
Examples of these pollutants are formation of sulphuric acid mist, smoke etc.
1. Sulfur compounds
2. Hydrocarbons
3. Nitrogen oxides
5. Carbon monoxide
Other emissions
1. Aldehydes
2. Ammonia
3. Odors
All these factors have a bearing in varying degrees on the quantities of emissions
from each refinery. Consequently it is desirable to undertake individual refinery
measurements or calculations to estimate factors for this purpose.
POLLUTANTS EMISSION
\6
S.NO TON/DYY
Carbon monoxide 13
1
Hydrocarbons 7
2
Aldehydes, organic acids 1
3
Sulphur dioxide 5
4
Nitrogen oxides 4
5
1. Sulphur compound:
Sulphur dioxide constitutes the maximum proportion of sulphur compound emitted
from refineries.
The main sources of sulphur dioxide are fuel combustion which are emitted from
combustion operations, such as fires heaters, boilers and catalytic cracking
regenerators and from sulphur dioxide extraction plants.
The amount of sulphur dioxide emission depends upon the type and amount of fuel
burnt and its sulphur content.
Emissions of oxides of sulphur are expressed in terms of sulphur dioxide knowing the
quantity of fuel used based either on flow meter reaching or actual tank gauges, and
the sulphur content of the fuel from actual laboratory analysis, the emissions of
sulphur dioxide may be easily calculated. Actual monitoring of stack gases on such
cases may not n[be necessary.
\7
Refinery flares incinerators and decoking operations are other minor sources.
Other sulphur components emitted from refineries hydrogen sulphide, sulphur trioxide
and mercaptants from treatment processes. However, these emissions are in from
evaporation of leaks and vent losses from storage facilities.
2. Hydrocarbons:
The emissions of hydrocarbons result mainly from evaporation of light oil during
storage and handling of crude and petroleum products and from leaks.
The major sources of hydrocarbon emission however, are evaporation losses from
storage tanks and from oil separators. These losses can only be estimated by
empherical formulae based on extensive testing and experience.
3. Oxides of nitrogen:
Combustion of fuel in fired heaters and boilers and internal combustion engines used
to drive compressors and electric generators are the main sources of nitrogen oxides
are also released from catalytic cracking regenerators and from “co” boilers.
Combustion of fossil fuels produces nitrogen oxides partly from the combination of
atmospheric nitrogen with excess oxygen in the furnace atmosphere, and partly from
combination of nitrogen oxides is mainly dependent on the flame temperature. The
residence time at this temperature and the excess air present in the flame.
4. Particulates:
\8
The major sources of emission of particulates in the petroleum refineries are catalytic
cracking regenerators.
The minor sources include internal combustion engines used to drive compressors and
electrical generators and incinerators.
The only significant source of carbon monoxide is the catalytic cracking regenerator.
When co boiler is not employed. No emissions of carbon monoxide are released.
When “co” boilers does not exist the emissions can be accurately calculated based on
stock gas analysis for carbon monoxide content and the quantity of air used for
regeneration, which is measured and controlled.
5. Carbon monoxide:
The only significant source of carbon monoxide in refineries is the catalytic cracking
regenerators. This, however is eliminated in units a CO boiler.
The minor sources include internal combustion engines used to drive compressors and
electric generators and incinerators. Incomplete combustion in furnaces and boiler and
also in generates CO emissions.
\9
2. Damage to the material
3. Damage to vegetarian
5. Physiological effects
The control of air pollution is an expensive and complex problem because the
character and quantity of refinery atmospheric emissions vary greatly from
refinery to refinery.
Refinery air pollution control techniques exist which should permit refineries to
operate in any community without constituting a serious air pollution problem. A
realistic control strategy, size of the installation, cost benefits, commercial and
possibility of creating other disposal problems.
Minimize sox emission either through desulfurization of fuels to the extent feasible
or by directing the use of high sulfur fuels to units equipped with so x emission
controls.
Nearly all refineries process generates gases which generally contain hydrogen
sulphide or other low molecular weight sulphur compounds. These gases are
normally used as fuel in fired heaters and reboilers.
The most common procedure for removal of hydrogen sulphide and light
mercaptants involves scrubbing the gases with an solution. Solvent such as
aqueous amine solution. The amine solution extracts the hydrogen sulphide and id
then regenerated by stripping hydrogen sulphide with heat and/or steam. The
regenerated solution is reused for further absorption. The hydrogen sulphide
\10
recovered from this process can be converted to either sulphuric acid or elemental
sulphur.
\11
1. Consider reformate and other octane boosters instead of tetraethyl
lead and other organic lead compounds for octane boosting.
2. Use non-chrome-based inhibitors in cooling water, where
inhibitors are needed.
2. WATER POLLUTANTS:
Water pollution due to discharge of industrial wastes has already become a serious
problem in certain areas of the country. The current practices adopted for the
disposal of industrial wastes in the country include discharge into public sewers,
rivers or sea through creeks and estuaries and on land.
Water is used in petroleum refineries for a variety of purposes. Since water does
not enter into the final product, it can be expected that 80-90% of the water
supplied to the refinery comes out as waste water. The characteristics of waste
water from petroleum refineries in India and their pollutant. It indicates that large
volumes of waste water are being discharged containing a variety of objectionable
and toxic organic and inorganic substances. If these waste water are not treated to
the desired degree, the pollutants reach the water course and bring out a number of
chances in the quality of the receiving water, which ultimately render the water
unsafe for aquatic life and for domestic and industrial use.
\12
\13
]CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE WATER AND POLLUTANTS/TOIX
CONSTITUENTS:
6 BOD/COD ------
“
7 BOD load, gm/unit product 0.3
“
1. PHYSICAL POLLUTION
2. CHEMICAL POLLUTION
3. PHYSIOLOGICAL POLLUTION
4. BIOLOGICAL POLLUTION
1. PHYSICAL POLLUTION:
\14
This is due to temperature, turbidity, suspended matter. Color, foam and
froth and radioactivity
Waters with higher temperature are usually encountered from thermal power
stations, cooling systems, etc. A mere rise of temperature by a few degrees
centigrade decreases the solubility of oxygen in water and this can affect the
receiving stream in two ways. It will increase the biological activity vis-à-vis
decrease the dissolved oxygen (DO) content and secondly, it will make the fish
migrate to other areas because of low DO and higher temperature. Because of
this, tolerance limits for temperature are prescribed for waste water for
discharge into inland surfaces waters.
2. CHEMICAL POLLUTION:
Some of the metals accumulate in ecosystems and reach man and animals.
Soluble salts commonly found in streams include chlorides, sulphates and
bicarbonates of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron and manganese.
Sources of oil pollution are from waste waters discharged from ships and oil
tankers, oil refineries, industrial plants handling oil and grease, lubrication of
machinery, metal reduction works, petroleum production spills and wastes.
3. PHYSIOLOGICAL POLLUTION:
\15
Taste and odour constitute physiological pollution. Several industrial wastes
contain chemicals which impart characteristic and unpleasant taste to water.
Salts of iron and manganese, chlorine, hydrogen sulphide, phenols, can be cited
as examples. Water pollution by industrial wastes containing taste-producing
substances may damage the value of fisheries.
4. BIOLOGICAL POLLUTION:
The uses of water can be categorized as drinking, cooling, boiler feed, direct
processing, sanitary and fire protection. The effluent waste originated can be
classified under:
b. Sanitary sewage
c. Process effluents.
The water free from oil includes storm water from oil free catchment areas,
water treatment plant effluent, boiler blown down etc. The process effluents are
basically oily waters originating from different sources, such as drainage from
pump houses, blow down from cooling systems, desalter water, overhead
condensate water from process units, spent caustic etc.
For effective treatment of the effluent water, the streams are segregated through
separate drainage systems and treated accordingly. The effluent treatment is
usually divided into three categories, i.e., primary, secondary and tertiary
\16
This treatment consists of oil removal in two stages by physical methods.
Various physical methods are available and these can be classified as baffling,
floatation, skimming, stripping, stripping and extraction.
The first stage of oil removal is done in small pond or basin where major
portion of oil is removed by using baffling, floatation and skimming methods.
a. Chemical method
b. Biological method
The main purpose of chemical method is to remove emulsified oil with addition
of flocculating agents and also to remove suspended solids and toxic substances
and thereby condition of effluents for further treatment by biological method.
Biological treatment aims at the removal of all oxidizable and organic matter
from the waste water. This method of treating waste water employs the use of:
2. Trickling filters
3. Oxidation ponds
4. Aerated lagoons
\17
tank. In this process high concentrations of newly grown and recycled microbial
biomass are suspended uniformly throughout holding tank to which raw
wastewaters are added.
The tricking filter is a packed media covered with biological slime through
which water is percolated.
The aerated lagoon is smaller, deeper oxidation pond equipped with mechanical
aerators or diffused air units. The addition of oxygen enables the aerated lagoon
to have a higher concentration of microbes than the oxidation pond. The
retention time in aerated lagoons is usually shorter, between 3 and10 day.
This treatment has been limited to activated carbon filteration process and
ozonation which are effective in removal of the taste and odour and organics
from biologically treated waste waters. The treated water which satisfy the
relevant tolerance limits are finally disposed by controlled dilution into the
neighbouring stream, river or sea.
SUSPENDED SOLIDS:
Suspended solids causing turbidity tend to reduce light penetration. This may or
may not be beneficial depending upon circumstances and water. For instance
turbidity caused by suspended silt and clay retards algal growth and when this
water is used for drinking.
PH:
\18
The hydrogen ion concentration of a raw-water source for domestic water is
important as it affects taste, corrosivity, efficiency of chlorination, treatment
processes such as coagulation and industrial applications.
TEMPERATURE:
In itself, BOD is not a pollutant and exercises no direct harm. However, BOD
does exert an indirect effect by depressing the dissolved oxygen content to
levels that are inimical to fish life and other beneficial uses. BOD effect can be
overcome by reaeration, dilution and/ or photosynthetic effect.
Oil in inland surface waters may interfere with gas exchange, coat bodies of
birds and fish and exert a direct toxic action on some organisms as a result of
water soluble components. Oil in water bodies used as a source of domestic
water supply has the following deleterious effects.
PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS:
\19
In water for domestic use harmful concentrations of phenol are much higher
than taste considerations would allow. The concentration of Phenolic
compounds is limited to 0.001 mg/l in drinking water because of tastes resulting
from the action of chlorine on such waters.
This method however fails in the absence of a catalyst to include some organic
compounds, such as acetic acid which are biologically available to the stream
organism, while including some biological compounds, such as cellulose, which
are not a part of the immediate biochemical load.
Total dissolved solids (TDS). TDS in irrigation water has direct physical effect
in prevention of water uptake by plants (osmotic effect); hence the need to
restrict the TDS in irrigation water. Moreover indirect through changes in soil
structure, permeability and aeration also occurs.
BORON:
Although traces of boron are essential for growth of all plants, more than 0.5
mg/l will be injurious to certain plants, like citrus fruits, plums, apples etc.
crops such as potatoes, tomatoes, wheat etc. can tolerate boron up to 2.0 mg/l.
\20
Sludge is the suspension of solids in process waters and aqueous wastes.
Sludge’s produced includes:
SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS:
SLUDGE CONDITIONING:
CHEMICAL CONDITIONING:
\21
It involves the use of either inorganic or organic chemicals. The most commonly
used inorganic chemicals for conditioning sludges include lime, ferrous and ferric
sulphates, ferric chloride and alum. Organic polyelectrolytes have been used in
sludge conditioning. These fall into three classes: non organic, anionic and
cationic. The chosen polyelectrolyte should have a charge opposite to that on the
sludge particles.
THERMAL CONDITIONING:
\22
CONCLUSION:
REFERENCES:
Alberini, Anna and Alan Krupnick (2000). ‘Cost-of-Illness and WTP Estimates of the
Benefits of Improved Air Quality: Evidence from Taiwan’, Land Economics 76(1).
\23
Asch, P. and Joseph, J. S. (1978). ‘Some Evidence on the Distribution of Air Quality’,
Land Economics, 54, 279-297.
Brainard, J. S., Jones, A.P., Bateman, I. J. and Andrew A. Lovett (2004). ‘Modelling
Environmental Equity: Exposure to Environmental Urban Noise Pollution in
Birmingham, UK’, CSERGE, Working Paper EDM 03-04, University of East
Anglia, Norwich (http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/
edm/edm_2003_04.pdf)
Brajer, Victor, and Jane V. Hall, (1992). ‘Recent Evidence on the Distribution of Air
Pollution Effects’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 10(2): 63-71
Brooks, N. and Rajiv Sethi (1997). ‘The Distribution of Pollution: Community
Characteristics and Exposure to Air Toxics’, Journal of Environmental Economics
and Management, 32: 233-250.
Central Pollution Control Board (2001). ‘Parivesh: Newsletter, Ministry of
Environment and Forests, Delhi.
_____(2002). ‘Toxic Air Pollutants’, Parivesh: Newsletter, Ministry of Environment
and Forests, Delhi.
Cropper, M.L., Simon, N.B., Alberini, A., Arora, S., Sharma, P.K. (1997). ‘The
Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control in Delhi’, American Journal of
Agricultural Economics, 79: 1625-1629.
CSE (1997) ‘Death is in the Air’, Down to Earth, Center for Science and
Environment.
Dave, J. M. (2001). ‘Air Quality Management’ - Dr. Nilay Chaudhury Memorial
Lecture, Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi.
\24