Delta Module One June 2010 Paper 2 PDF
Delta Module One June 2010 Paper 2 PDF
Delta Module One June 2010 Paper 2 PDF
PAPER 2
Additional materials:
Answer booklet
PV1
© UCLES 2010 Delta Module One
2
The text for this task is reproduced on the opposite page. It is being used in the following situation.
E works for a large company giving investment advice. She uses English daily in her
contacts with clients over the telephone, in conference calls and when giving
presentations. She is at upper intermediate (CEFR B2) level and has booked a short
tailor-made one-to-one English course to improve her speaking skills for work. Her
teacher has decided to give her this test to find out her needs at the start of the course.
Using your knowledge of relevant testing concepts, evaluate the effectiveness of the tasks in this test
for this learner in this situation.
Make a total of six points. You must include both positive and negative points.
Turn over Ź
4
The text for Tasks Two and Three is reproduced on pages 5, 6 and 7.
The purpose of the extract as a whole is to teach the functional language of requests and appropriate
responses to upper intermediate (CEFR B2) level learners.
a Identify the purpose of the exercises in the box below in relation to the purpose of the extract as a
whole.
Exercise 14
Exercise 15
Exercise 17
Exercise 18a
18b
b Identify a total of six key assumptions about language learning that are evident in the exercises in
the box above and explain why the authors might consider these assumptions to be important for
language learning. State which exercise or exercises each assumption refers to.
Comment on the ways in which the exercises 19, 21 and 22 combine with the exercises discussed in
Task Two.
Just Right Upper Intermediate Student’s Book, Jeremy Harmer and Carol Lethaby, 2005, Marshall Cavendish,
p20-21
Turn over Ź
6
7
Tapescript p3
Turn over Ź
8
Enjoy yourselves!
Paul Bress suggests (seven) ways to teach enjoyable and memorable grammar lessons.
There might be a number of reasons for students' reactions to grammar. For example, some
students' brain chemistry might be more (or less) pre-programmed for learning grammar. If the
latter is the case, the teacher has limited power to promote the enjoyment of grammar. But it's
also possible that students have had a negative learning experience with grammar - they might
be used to listening to lectures about grammar and doing long, esoteric exercises on one
particular area of target language.
In order to make grammar more interesting for students, I recommend a more inductive
approach, ie students should be allowed to work out the rules of the grammar for themselves. I
also think that the teachers' metalanguage (the technical language used to talk about the target
structures) should be kept to an absolute minimum.
a Bress suggests that ‘students should be allowed to work out the rules of grammar for themselves’.
What are the possible benefits of this approach, for the students and the teacher?
Enjoy Yourselves, Paul Bress, English Teaching Professional, November 2007, Issue 53, p30