E-Book Tunicate
E-Book Tunicate
E-Book Tunicate
Pelagic Tunicates
This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no
part may be reproduced by any process or stored in any retrieval system or database
without prior written permission from the copyright holder.
The intent of this report is to be used as a field guide for the identification of midwater
invertebrates of South-eastern Australia. It is envisioned that this report will lead to
further editions as a published field guide; comments toward improving the presentation
and usability are appreciated. This work was supported by CSIRO Wealth from Oceans
Flagship.
Gershwin, L., Lewis, M., Gowlett-Holmes, K., and Kloser, R. 2014. The Pelagic Tunicates. In: Pelagic
Invertebrates of South-Eastern Australia: A field reference guide. Version 1.1. CSIRO Marine and
Atmospheric Research: Hobart.
http://zoobank.org/References/9A9676DD-F5AB-42D6-8349-3B1D93D7A47A
596.20994
Acknowledgments
Figures were drawn by Ellen Lund Jensen / copyright CSIRO, unless otherwise noted. Trawl images
were taken by Mark Lewis aboard the Southern Surveyor in trans-Tasman research voyages and are
the copyright of CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research. We sincerely thank the following people
for use of their images:
David Wrobel: cover and pp. 7, 10, 11, 16, 18, 20. Richard Herrmann: cover.
Guido & Philippe Poppe: cover, pp. 13, 16, 21, 22. Cronodon.com: p. 3.
Alice Alldredge: p. 6. Russ Hopcroft: p. 8.
Mick Baron: p. 10. Mailie Gall: pp. 11, 19, 21.
Briony Hutton: p. 11. Gregory Dellavalle: p. 21.
Cover montage
Clockwise, from upper left: Oikopleura sp. (copyright Guido & Philippe Poppe), Thalia democratica
(copyright David Wrobel), Salpa fusiformis (copyright David Wrobel), Doliolum denticulatum
(copyright L. Gershwin), Pegea confoederata (copyright Richard Herrmann), Soestia zonaria
(copyright David Wrobel), Cyclosalpa bakeri (copyright David Wrobel).
Mouth
Body
Tail
Notochord
The appendicularians (also called ‘larvaceans’) belong to the Class Appendicularia; these are tiny
tadpole-shaped organisms that create a disposable mucous house for feeding. Their body consists of
a short oval trunk and a broad, flat tail. Sitting in or under their house that is many times their own
size, the animal undulates its tail to create a feeding current through the windows in the house.
Discarded houses provide an important substrate and food source of planktonic debris known as
‘marine snow’. Appendicularians are hermaphrodites.
The salps belong to the Class Thaliacea and Order Salpida. In general, salps look like transparent
gelatinous barrels encircled with numerous strong muscle bands: water is pumped in one end (the
incurrent siphon) and out the other (the excurrent siphon), providing both a feeding current over a
mucous net and jet propulsion. The internal body organs include a ciliated gill bar for driving the
mucous net toward the oesophagus and a tight compact ‘nucleus’ near the posterior end of the
body that contains the guts and gonads.
Salps feed with the aid of the mucous net to capture tiny particles. They are mostly herbivores,
feeding on vast quantities of phytoplankton. Salps are easy prey for pelagic snails such as
heteropods, jellyfish, sea turtles, sea birds, and many types of fish. They also provide travelling
homes for hyperiid amphipods, pelagic octopus, and some species of fish.
Salps have a complex life cycle that alternates between solitary and aggregate generations. The
solitary individual (or oozooid) develops a stolon that elongates with asexually developing
aggregates. The aggregates (or blastozooids, which bear sexual gonozooids) are sequentially
hermaphroditic: young females are fertilised by older males from other chains.
Thaliaceans get their name from their propensity to proliferate rapidly when environmental
conditions are favourable (thalia means ‘blooming’ in Greek). Some salps are able to grow at the
extraordinary rate of more than 10% of their body length per hour, and can complete an entire
generation in a matter of hours (Heron, 1972a). These blooms exploit short-lived bursts of
phytoplankton productivity, exerting tremendous pressure on the ecosystem. These massive
aggregations may span hundreds of kilometres and interfere with human enterprise such as clogging
up fishing nets and cooling water intake pipes of power plants.
Pelagic tunicates are of great interest to marine biologists for two primary reasons. First, they are
good indicators of different types of water masses and act as early warning systems for changing
water chemistry. Second, they play an important role in carbon recycling and sequestration.
Only recently the phylogeny of the Thaliacea has been studied based on molecular sequences
(Govindarajan, 2011). Most of the lineages interpreted through conventional taxonomy were
mirrored in the molecular data, the notable exceptions being that the Cyclosalpa are nested within
the Salpidae and that Iasis (Weelia) is distinct from the genus Salpa. The pyrosomes appear to be the
sister group to the salps and doliolids. Currently at least 22 appendicularians and 26 species of
thaliaceans and are known from Australian waters; most are cosmopolitan and none are endemic.
Species of appendicularians are distinguished based on body shape and characteristics of the
endostyle, pharyngeal perforations, stomach wall, oikoplast epithelium, and tail. These
characteristics are beyond the scope of this guide, so these species are treated at the family level.
Species recognition of thaliaceans is based on the number and arrangement of muscle bands that
encircle the body: the muscle bands are counted starting at the oral opening (i.e., away from the
visceral nucleus) and usually expressed as MI – MVII or as applicable. For the most part, salps are
easy to tell apart and all are treated herein. Definitive identification of some species requires counts
of the muscle fibres, which are beyond the scope of this guide.
ANNOTATED CLASSIFICATION
PHYLUM CHORDATA: SUBPHYLUM TUNICATA
CLASS APPENDICULARIA: the tail is joined at 90° to the body
Family Oikopleuridae: body oval in shape and on same axis as tail ................................................. 7
Family Fritillaridae: body flattened or spindle-shaped; tail orientated at right angle to body ........ 8
Family Kowalevskiidae: body short, tail fusiform or spindle-shaped in outline ............................... 8
CLASS THALIACEA: Body barrel-shaped and open at both ends
Family Doiliolidae: Small; body muscles in complete parallel rings around the body
Doliolum: intestine forming a coil ............................................................................................... 9
Dolioletta: intestine forming an arch .......................................................................................... 9
Family Pyrosomidae: Colonial; zooids embedded in a common, tube-shaped matrix
Pyrosoma: firm cartilaginous test .............................................................................................. 10
Pyrostremma: test is soft and easily fragments ......................................................................... 10
Family Salpidae: Large-ish; body muscles often incomplete and approaching or fusing
Subfamily Cyclosalpinae: gut linear, at an oblique angle across the body
Cyclosalpa: aggregate zooids bilateral, arranged radially in whorls .......................................... 11
Helicosalpa: aggregate zooids asymmetrical, arranged in chains ............................................. 11
Subfamily Salpinae: gut in a compact nucleus in posterior of the body
Brooksia: with a long anterior rostrum ..................................................................................... 12
Iasis: body elongate, rounded in front, blunt in back, with 9 body muscles ............................. 13
Ihlea: body elongate, cylindrical, with 7 very broad muscles .................................................... 14
Metcalfina: body cylindrical and firm, with two long posterior processes; 9-12 muscle bands.15
Pegea: developing stolon coiled flatly around the gut mass ..................................................... 16
Ritteriella: elongated and cylindrical, flabby, with 9-31 nearly parallel muscles ...................... 17
Salpa: thick and firm with pointy ends, with 9 muscle bands lacking ventrally ........................ 18
Soestia: body terminates squarely in front, to point in rear, with 6 wide muscle bands .......... 19
Thalia: small, barrel-shaped, with two long posterior processes; with 5 muscle bands ........... 20
Thetys: body large, sole-shaped, with 16-22 parallel muscle bands and two short ‘tails’ ......... 21
Traustedtia: body globular with numerous projections; 5 muscle bands lacking ventrally ...... 22
Csirosalpa: body globular; 4 muscles; nucleus horizontal, with long ‘tentacle’ ..................... 23
The best identification resources for pelagic tunicates include the following:
Bone, Q. 1998. The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates, Oxford University Press.
Godeaux, J. E. A. 2003. History and revised classification of the order Cyclomyaria (Tunicata,
Thaliacea, Doliolida). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie
73: 191−222.
Kim, S., J.-H. Won and C.-B. Kim. 2012. Taxonomic Study of Genus Cyclosalpa (Thaliacea:
Salpida: Salpidae) from Korea. Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity 28(4): 261-268.
O'Sullivan, D. 1983. A guide to the Pelagic Tunicates of the Southern Ocean and adjacent
waters. Kingston, Tasmania, Antarctic Division.
Thompson, H. 1948. Pelagic Tunicates of Australia. Melbourne, Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research.
Wrobel, D. Jellies Zone. http://jellieszone.com/
Megalocercus (the whitish tadpole-like creature in the centre) inside its mucous house. This photo
was taken by using carmine dye. This particulate dye was filtered into the house as if it was
phytoplankton to help make the house show up better. Image copyright Alice Alldredge.
MAY BE CONFUSED WITH: Fritillariidae: see Oikopleura in house – redrawn from Emily Damstra
comparative notes therein.
NOTES: With the exception of Bathochordeus, which is huge (~7cm) in comparison to the others, the
oikopleurids are unlikely to be recognised in a typical midwater sample because of their small size.
Appendicularians (also called larvaceans) secrete mucus from a special gland to make a feeding net
(called a ‘house’); the organism sits inside the house, producing water currents with undulations of
the tail, thus filtering food particles. When the house becomes clogged with particles, it is discarded
and a new one is built; more than 10 houses may be built in a day, depending upon feeding
conditions.
Larvaceans develop rapidly and have a short generation time; these features make them able to
quickly produce dense blooms. As discussed in the Introduction, discarded appendicularian houses
slowly drift toward the seafloor as ‘marine snow’. These houses serve as substrate for midwater
microbes and as an important source of food for other zooplankton.
Keys to the species of Larvaceans may be found in: Fenaux, R. 1998. The classification of
Appendicularia. The biology of pelagic tunicates. Q. Bone. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 295-306.
FIELD MORPHOLOGY: Less than 5mm total Fritillaria borealis -- Copyright Russ Hopcroft.
length, usually more on the order of 1-2mm.
Body elongated or flattened dorso-ventrally;
tail short and broad, indented in median part
of front edge in some species.
NOTES: As with most other appendicularians, the fritillarids are unlikely to be recognised in a
standard midwater sample due to their small size (typically about 1mm). However, they can at times
be extremely common and comprise an important part of the food web, both as living organisms
and in their contribution to the marine snow by their discarded mucous houses.
In its normal undisturbed drifting mode, Fritillaria sits below the house, whereas Oikopleura sits
within the house.
NOTES: Doliolids are typically found in the euphotic zone of tropical and temperate shelf waters
around the world. Both Doliolum and Dolioletta are common in SE Australian waters. They have the
most complex life history of any thaliacean, with up to six distinct body forms among two life stages.
Like pyrosomes, doliolids move and feed by means of ciliary currents pumping water into the body,
through a mucous feeding filter, and then passing out of the body. Unlike salps, which must contract
the body wall to swim and feed, doliolids generally only contract the body wall for rapid escape.
When algal food is plentiful, a single oozooid can produce thousands of gonozooids within a few
days; in these conditions, there may be up to 500 individuals per cubic metre of water.
Cyclosalpa affinis (Chamisso, 1819) CAAB35 103001 Cyclosalpa polae Sigl, 1912 35 103004
Cyclosalpa bakeri Ritter, 1905 35 103002 Helicosalpa virgula (Vogt, 1854) 35 103006
Cyclosalpa floridana (Apstein, 1894) 35 103003
C. affinis - Copyright David Wrobel Cyclosalpa sp. – ss2011 Copyright Mailie Gall
FIELD MORPHOLOGY: The test is soft, smooth, and lacking serrations or projections, except in the
aggregates of Helicosalpa, which are firm and smooth, with a posterior-pointing projection. The
taxonomy of Cyclosalpa was recently reviewed by Kim et al. (2012).
Solitary form: The gut mass is long and straight rather than coiled into a tight nucleus; the 7 body
muscles form almost complete loops, with luminous organs on or between some of the bands. Body
length: both genera to about 15cm, depending on species (e.g., C. floridana reaches 12mm).
Aggregate form: The two genera differ in the form of the aggregates, with Cyclosalpa zooids are
bilateral and arranged radially into whorls of up to 15 individuals (length to 10cm), and Helicosalpa
zooids are asymmetrical and arranged in chains without an attachment peduncle (length to 3.5cm).
MAY BE CONFUSED WITH: The solitary form is utterly distinctive with the long rostrum. The strongly
asymmetrical aggregate zooid is similar to that of Helicosalpa virgula, but Helocosalpa has only 4
body muscles and they are hard to distinguish, whereas Brooksia has 7 that are easier to identify.
NOTES: Brooksia rostrata is a rare species about which little is known. It is easily overlooked,
particularly the aggregate stage during dense salp blooms such as those seen with Thalia
democratica. Brooksia rostrata is generally found in warm tropical waters along with its congener B.
berneri, with which it is easily confused (note that B. berneri has not yet been reported from SE
Australian waters). The morphology of Brooksia was reviewed by van Soest (1975a).
A distribution study during non-bloom conditions near Bermuda found that Brooksia rostrata was
consistently present above 30m in relatively high numbers in the afternoon, compared to deeper net
sampling and morning and nighttime dives where it was poorly represented, suggesting a strong
vertical migration pattern (Madin et al., 1996). It was also considerably more common in the spring
than in the autumn.
In SE Australian waters, Brooksia is strongly associated with offshore sub-tropical surface waters to
the extent that its blooms actually track the seasonal southerly shift of sub-tropical conditions
(Thompson, 1948). It peaks in abundance in tropical Queensland waters in December and May
(Russell and Colman, 1935).
Curiously, species of ctenophores in the genus Lampea depend on particular salps as their primary
food source; for example, L. lactea is a highly specific parasite and predator on I. cylindrica
(Harbison, 1998).
Aggregate form: Body barrel-shaped like the Ihlea magalhanica – Copyright CSIRO 1948
doliolids, but with a gelatinous projection on one Top, aggregate form; bottom, solitary form
MAY BE CONFUSED WITH: The reduced posterior diameter and broad muscle bands make this
species distinctive.
NOTES: Despite being typically regarded as rare, this was by far the commonest salp after Thalia
democratica in south-eastern Australian samples from the Warreen survey, with over 130,000
specimens collected from 52 stations between 1938-1941 (Thompson, 1948). In fact, off Tasmania,
Ihlea even surpassed Thalia in density, leading Thompson to conclude that it is a cold-water form
and might be useful as an indicator of southern water masses. Here, Ihlea was found almost entirely
in the top 50m of the water column, with its maximum numbers between October and February.
However, in contrast, New Zealand studies have demonstrated fairly conclusively that Ihlea is in fact
a warm water species rather than a cold-water species (Bary, 1960). The salinity and temperature
profiles coinciding with its occurrence led the author to conclude that Ihlea is associated with and
indicative of water of subtropical origin. Foxton (1971), however, concluded that the species is
circumpolar and generally associated with the subtropical convergence in a narrow range from 34-
44°S in the Atlantic sector, from 39-49°S in the Australia-New Zealand sector, and as far north as
Valparaiso, Chile in the Pacific sector. The closely related I. racovitzai is truly Antarctic and does not
occur north of the Antarctic convergence.
MAY BE CONFUSED WITH: The solitary stage might be confused with that of Thetys, as both grow
very large and have two posterior ‘tails’. However, the 9-12 broad muscle bands of Metcalfina
compared to the 16-22 fine bands of Thetys should help to readily separate the two species.
NOTES: While other salp genera are distributed over the warmer and temperate parts of the three
great oceans, Metcalfina is exceptional in being confined to the warmer waters of the Indo-Pacific.
Indeed, van Soest (1975b) described Metcalfina as an ‘extremely stenothermous’ species (i.e.,
capable of thriving only within a limited temperature range); its lowest temperature limit is 25°C.
Paradoxically, it is typically found in deeper waters and was taken by the Warreen in the wintertime
down to 200m.
Thompson (1948) reported that Metcalfina was one of the rarest forms of all in his extensive
sampling from 1938-1941, and was only taken at times when other species were less abundant.
However, Hereu et al. (2010) found that sometimes the abundance of Metcalfina (49%) surpassed
even that of Thalia democratica in dominance in the Mexican Pacific.
FIELD MORPHOLOGY:
Test smooth, thick, not
very firm. Both solitary
and aggregate have only
four body muscles which
form into two X-shaped
groups; the muscles only
cover the dorsal surface
of the body.
NOTES: Three species are recognised in the genus, two of which are found in Australian waters. Both
are relatively uncommon. Some authors have considered R. retracta to be a junior synonym of R.
picteti, but van Soest (1974b) demonstrated sufficient morphological grounds for recognising R.
retracta as a distinct species. Moreover, it appears from van Soest’s same work that Indo-Pacific R.
retracta may be further divided into two subspecies.
NOTES: Salpa fusiformis is among the most abundant salp species and has the widest distribution,
from 70°N to 45°S worldwide. S. maxima is not uncommon in the tropical and subtropical world’s
oceans and seas.
Curiously, the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus has been reported to switch its prey
preference from macroalgae to Salpa fusiformis during times of salp blooms (Duggins, 1981).
Soestia zonaria, solitary form, left; aggregate form, right - Copyright Mailie Gall
Aggregate form: Body oval, tapering to pointed or Thalia democratica – copyright CSIRO 1948
rounded posterior process. The test is thick, with both Top, aggregate form; bottom, solitary form
openings dorsal. Body muscles 4, continuous dorsally
but broadly interrupted ventrally. Length to 12mm,
more commonly 6mm.
Three other species in the genus, namely Thalia cicar Van Soest, 1973, Thalia rhinoceros Van Soest,
1975, and Thalia rhomboides (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824), also occur in Australia but have only been
reported from Queensland and do not seem to have made it further south yet (Kott, 2009).
Copepods of the genus Sapphirina are often found in association with salps, particularly Pegea and
Thalia (Harbison, 1998).
v. 1.1 ~ April 2014 Page 20
Pelagic Tunicates
Thetys vagina, solitary -- MIDOC SS2011_T02 – Thetys vagina, aggregate -- SS2011 TO2 – Copyright
OP31_MIDOC5. Note two posterior tails. Mailie. Note thickened tuberculated region over gut.
MAY BE CONFUSED WITH: For most people familiar with salps, mention of a large salp brings to
mind Thetys; however, several other species can also grow quite large. For example, species of
Cyclosalpa and Pegea can reach 15cm in length. However, the numerous parallel muscles and two
posterior projections make Thetys difficult to mistake.
NOTES: Thetys tolerates colder water than most other salps and is most often found in far southern
waters, e.g., off the Tasmanian shelf; it is also known from California, Japan, and the Eastern
Atlantic. Sometimes it occurs in large swarms off Tasmania and New South Wales.
Aggregate form: Test soft and globular, with 3 long Traustedtia multitentaculata – copyright CSIRO 1948
Top, aggregate form; bottom, solitary form.
posterior projections, i.e., paired tentacles and a
median projection from the nucleus. Body muscles
4 on dorsal and lateral surfaces, arranged in two
groups of two. Length 16-20mm, excluding
projections.
It is found in warm waters of the three great oceans from 40°N to 30°S. Thompson (1948) found its
greatest abundance in the latitudes between Sydney and southern Queensland, with only a single
specimen taken in the waters off Tasmania. No specimens were taken by the Great Barrier Reef
Expedition (Russell and Colman, 1935). It is commonest in spring.
The curious long posterior filament is worthy of discussion. In life, it flows with colony movement as
if it were a fine thread. However, as it is encased within a thick gelatinous extension of the tunic, it is
not a filament as such. Its function is unknown.
Aboral – literally, ‘away from the mouth’, or in salps, the end closest to the nucleus; the term is used
for orientation. See also ‘oral’.
Aboral processes – finger-like extensions of the body on the aboral end, particularly obvious in
Metcalfina, Thalia and Thetys.
Aggregate stage – the sexual stage of salps, developed asexually; compare with ‘solitary stage’.
Appendicularian – mucous-house-building, tadpole-shaped pelagic tunicate resembling the larvae of
other tunicates.
Dorsal tubercle – in the cyclosalps, a raised gelatinous design on the outer surface over the gill bar,
near the oral opening; the pattern of the dorsal tubercle is highly diagnostic.
Excurrent siphon – the opening where water is expelled; in salps, used for jet propulsion.
Gill bar – a ciliated internal structure in salps and doliolids; the cilia drive the mucous net to the
oesophageal opening.
Hermaphrodite – an individual that is both male and female; hermaphroditic organisms may be
either simultaneous hermaphrodites (male and female at the same time), or sequential
hermaphrodites (male first, then female, or vice versa).
Holopelagic – spending one’s entire life drifting in the open ocean.
Incurrent siphon – the opening where water is taken in; this current of water passes through a
mucous net, which filters out food particles.
Marine snow – small, sinking organic particles that concentrate carbon, acting both as an important
food source for organisms in the deep sea, and also to help transport and sequester carbon
Muscle bands – prominent bands of muscle tissue that encircle the salp body and are used in
locomotion and feeding; the number and arrangement of the muscle bands are highly diagnostic.
Nucleus – the gut mass; globular in most salps, but linear in the cyclosalps.
Notochord – a flexible, rod-like body found in the embryo stage of all chordates, including tunicates;
notochords served as the first ‘backbone’ support structures in early chordates.
Solitary stage – also called the ‘nurse’ stage of salps, the solitary individual develops a stolon of
asexually developing aggregates; compare with ‘aggregate stage’.
Tunic – a layer of cellulose integumentary tissue that covers the epidermis, found in benthic and
pelagic tunicates and unique to this group; the tunic of salps is often lost during collection.
Tunicate – invertebrates in the subphylum Urochordata.
GENERAL
Bary, B. M. 1960. Notes on Ecology, Distribution, and Systematics of Pelagic Tunicata from New
Zealand. Pacific Science 14(2): 101-121.
Berrill, N. J. 1950. The Tunicata. Vol. 133, Ray Society Publications.
Bone, Q. 1998. The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates, Oxford University Press.
Kott, P. 2006. Tunicata. Australian Faunal Directory, Last modified: 21 November 2008. 13 June
2012. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-
resources/fauna/afd/taxa/TUNICATA.
Russell, F. S. and J. S. Colman. 1935. The zooplankton. IV. The occurrence and seasonal distribution
of the Tunicata, Mollusca, and Coelenterata (Siphonophora). Scientific Reports of the Great
Barrier Reef Expedition 11(7): 203-276, 30 text figs.
Thompson, H. 1948. Pelagic Tunicates of Australia. Melbourne, Council for Scientific and Industrial
Research.
Tokioka, T. 1960. Studies on the distribution of appendicularians and some thaliaceans of the north
Pacific, with some morphological notes. Publications of the Seto Marine Biology Laboratory
8: 351-443.
APPENDICULARIA
Aida, T. 1907. Appendicularia of Japanese waters. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial
University of Tokyo 23(5): 1-25, plates i-iv.
Alldredge, A. 1978. Appendicularians. Scientific American 235: 95-102.
Deibel, D. 1998. Feeding and metabolism of Appendicularia. pp. 139-150 in Bone, Q. (ed.). The
Biology of Pelagic Tunicates. New York : Oxford University Press 340 pp.
Essenberg, C.E. 1926. Copelata from the San Diego Region. University of California Publications in
Zoology 28(22): 399-521.
Fenaux, R. 1993. The classification of the Appendicularia (Tunicata): History and current state.
Mémoires de l'Institut Océanographique, Monaco 17: 1-123.
Fenaux, R., Galt, C.P. & Carpino-Lancre, J. 1990. Bibliographie des Appendiculaires (1821–1989).
Mémoires de l'Institut Océanographique, Monaco 15: 1-129.
Flood, R. & Deibel, D. 1998. The appendicular house. pp. 105-124 in Bone, Q. (ed.). The Biology of
Pelagic Tunicates. New York : Oxford University Press 340 pp.
Herdman, W.A. 1882. Report on the Tunicata collected during the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger
during the years 1873–1876. Pt I, Ascidiae simplices. Report on the Scientific Results of the
Voyage of the H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76 (Zoology) 6(17): 1-296.
Huxley, T.H. 1851. Remarks upon Appendicularia and Doliolum, two genera of the Tunicata.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 2: 595-605 pl. xviii.
Tokioka, T. 1940. Some additional notes on the Japanese appendicularian fauna. Records of the
Oceanographic Works in Japan 11(1): 1-26.
Tokioka, T. 1960. Studies on the distribution of appendicularians and some thaliaceans of the North
Pacific, with some morphological notes. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological
Laboratory 8(2): 351-443.
THALIACEA
Baker, A. N. 1971. Pyrosoma spinosum Herdman, a giant pelagic tunicate new to New Zealand
waters. Records of the Dominion Museum (Wellington) 7(12): 107-117.
Berner, L. D. 1967. Distributional Atlas of Thaliacea in the California Current region. California
Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Atlas 8: 1-322.
Duggins, D. O. 1981. Sea urchins and kelp: The effects of short term changes in urchin diet.
Limnology and Oceanography 26(2): 391-394.
Everett, J. D., M. E. Baird and I. M. Suthers. 2011. Three-dimensional structure of a swarm of the salp
Thalia democratica within a cold-core eddy off southeast Australia. J. Geophys. Res. 116:
C12046.
Foxton, P. 1971. On lhlea magalhanica and Ihlea racovitzai. Discovery Reports 35: 179-198.
Fraser, J. H. 1947. Thaliacea — I. Family: Salpidae. Fiches d'Identification du Zooplancton, 9.
Kopenhagen, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer: 1-4.
Fraser, J. H. 1947. Thaliacea — II. Family: Doliolidae. Fiches d'Identification du Zooplancton, 10.
Kopenhagen, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer: 1-4.
Glaubrecht, M. and W. Dohle. 2012. Discovering the alternation of generations in salps (Tunicata,
Thaliacea): Adelbert von Chamisso’s dissertation “De Salpa” 1819 – its material, origin and
reception in the early nineteenth century. Zoosyst. Evol. 88(2): 317-363.
Godeaux, J.E.A., 2003. History and revised classification of the order Cyclomyaria (Tunicata,
Thaliacea, Doliolida). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie,
73, 191−222.
Govindarajan, A. F., A. Bucklin and L. P. Madin. 2011. A molecular phylogeny of the Thaliacea.
Journal of Plankton Research 33(6): 843-853.
Griffin, D. J. G. and J. C. Yaldwyn. 1970. Giant colonies of pelagic tunicates (Pyrosoma spinosum)
from SE Australia and New Zealand. Nature 226: 464.
Harbison, G. R. 1998. The parasites and predators of Thaliacea. The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates. Q.
Bone. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 187-214.
Harbison, G. R. and R. W. Gilmer. 1976. The feeding rates of the pelagic tunicate Pegea confederata
and two other salps. Limnology and Oceanography 21: 517-528.
Henschke, N., J. D. Everett, M. E. Baird, M. D. Taylor and I. M. Suthers. 2011. Distribution of life-
history stages of the salp Thalia democratica in shelf waters during a spring bloom. Marine
Ecology Progress Series 430: 49-62.
Herdman, W.A. 1888. Report upon the Tunicata collected during the voyage of H.M.S. 'Challenger',
during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of the H.M.S.
Challenger during the years 1873-76 (Zoology) 27(76): 1-166, plates i-xi.
Hereu, C. M., B. E. Lavaniegos and R. Goericke. 2010. Grazing impact of salp (Tunicata, Thaliacea)
assemblages in the eastern tropical North Pacific. Journal of Plankton Research 32(6): 785-
804.
Heron, A.C. 1972a. Population ecology of a colonizing species: the pelagic tunicate Thalia
democratica. I. Individual growth rate and generation time. Oecologia (Berlin) 10: 289-293.
Heron, A.C. 1972b. Population ecology of a colonizing species: the pelagic tunicate Thalia
democratica. II. Population growth rate. Oecologia (Berlin) 10: 294-312.
Heron, A.C. 1973. A new type of heart mechanism in the invertebrates. Journal of the Marine
Biological Association of the United Kingdom 53: 425-428.
Heron, A.C. 1973. A specialised predator-prey relationship between the copepod Sapphirina angusta
and the pelagic tunicate Thalia democratica. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of
the United Kingdom 53: 429-435.
Heron, A.C. 1975. Advantages of heart reversal in pelagic tunicates. Journal of the Marine Biological
Association of the United Kingdom 55: 959-963.
Heron, A.C. 1976. A new type of excretory mechanism in the tunicates. Marine Biology, Berlin 36:
191-197.
Heron, A.C. & Benham, E.E. 1983. Individual growth rates of salps in three populations. Journal of
Plankton Research 6: 811-828.
Heron, A.C. & Benham, E.E. 1985. Life history parameters as indicators of growth rate in three salp
populations. Journal of Plankton Research 7: 365-379.
Heron, A.C., McWilliam, P.S. & Dal Pont, G. 1988. Length-weight relation in the salp Thalia
democratica and potential of salps as a source of food. Marine Ecology Progress Series 42:
125-132.
Kim, S., J.-H. Won and C.-B. Kim. 2012. Taxonomic Study of Genus Cyclosalpa (Thaliacea: Salpida:
Salpidae) from Korea. Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity 28(4): 261-268.
Kott, P. 2009. Thaliacea. Australian Faunal Directory, Last modified: Thursday, 25 June 2009.
Accessed: 11 May 2012. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-
resources/fauna/afd/taxa/THALIACEA.
Lavaniegos, B. E. and M. D. Ohman. 2003. Long-term changes in pelagic tunicates of the California
Current. Deep-Sea Research II 50: 2473-2498.
Lee, R. F., M. Köster and G.-A. Paffenhöfer. 2012. Ingestion and defecation of dispersed oil droplets
by pelagic tunicates. Journal of Plankton Research 34(12): 1058-1063.
Lohmann, H. 1909. Copelata und Thaliacea. pp. 143-149 in Michaelsen, W. & Hartmeyer, R. (eds).
Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens. 2(10) Jena: Fischer.
Madin, L. P. 1990. Aspects of jet propulsion in salps. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68(4): 765-777.
Madin, L. P., P. Kremer and S. Hacker. 1996. Distribution and vertical migration of salps (Tunicata,
Thaliacea) near Bermuda. Journal of Plankton Research 18(5): 747-755.
Metcalf, M.M. 1919. Metcalf and Bell upon Salpidae. Science (Washington, D.C.) 50(1279): 19-20.
Ritter, W.E. 1905. The pelagic Tunicata of the San Diego Region, excepting the Larvacea. University of
California Publications in Zoology 2(3): 51-112, plates ii, iii.
Tokioka, T. 1960. Studies on the distribution of appendicularians and some thaliaceans of the North
Pacific, with some morphological notes. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological
Laboratory 8(2): 351-443.
Van Soest, R.W.M. 1973. The genus Thalia Blumenbach, 1798 (Tunicata, Thaliacea) with descriptions
of two new species. Beaufortia 20: 193-212.
Van Soest, R.W.M. 1974a. Taxonomy of the subfamily Cyclosalpinae Yount, 1954, with descriptions
of two new species. Beaufortia 22(288): 17-55.
Van Soest, R.W.M. 1974b. A revision of the genera Salpa Forskål, 1775, Pegea Savigny, 1816 and
Ritteriella Metcalf, 1919 (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Beaufortia 22(293): 153-191.
van Soest, R. W. M. 1975a. Observations on taxonomy and distribution of some salps (Tunicata,
Thaliacea), with descriptions of three new species. Beaufortia 23: 105-130.
van Soest, R. W. M. 1975b. Zoogeography and speciation in the Salpidae. Beaufortia 23(307): 181-
215.
Van Soest, R.W.M. 1979. Revised classification of the order Pyrosomatida (Tunicata, Thaliacea) with
the description of a new genus. Steenstrupia 5(11): 197-217.
Van Soest, R.W.M. 1981. A monograph of the order Pyrosomatida (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Journal of
Plankton Research 3(4): 603-631.