A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
Hospitality Leadership
A Time of Change in
Hospitality Leadership
Chris Sheppardson
A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Keywords
chief executive officer (CEO); chief operating officer (COO); chief
financial officer (CFO); chief marketing officer (CMO); human resources
director (HRD); managing director (MD); millennials; baby boomers;
silent generation; Gen Z; artificial intelligence (AI); C-suite; diversity &
inclusion (D&I); mergers & acquisitions (M&A); sustainability
Contents
Appendix��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������209
References�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������231
About the Author��������������������������������������������������������������������������������239
Index�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������241
Success is Never Final
“Success is Never Final. Failure is Never Fatal. It’s Courage that Counts.(1)”
—Sir Winston Churchill
“The years of leadership by the baby boomer generation are moving toward
their natural conclusion. It will result in a shift from the one of the most suc-
cessful business generations ever to that of the millennial’s generation: a gener-
ation that has been heavily critiqued and is seen to be unproven, untested. Yet
there this an exciting prospect as they are progressive and aspiring to see a bet-
ter world. They have a belief in sustainability in communities, in culture, in
business, and environment. Both generations should work together to ease the
way, but the chasm between the generations is currently too large. Strangely
enough, the differences are not as large as they may appear. The millennials,
in truth, are only a reflection of the baby boomers who have heavily influ-
enced them. Both generations began their journeys with strong ideals. The
baby boomers compromised in line with the challenges that they faced, but
still raised another generation stressing the ideals that they still held close to
them, so a bridge should be able to be built. How can this be achieved?” —by
Chris Sheppardson, Edited by Lauran Bush MA, Research support by
Iwona Drozdz, 2020
Acknowledgements
It is only correct that I acknowledge a number of their support, guidance
and friendship during the writing of this book including:
Thank you to all the above and to all those interviewed during the process
from all across the world.
Our thanks.
Introduction
There are many who argue that leaders are born, that leaders will possess
the natural attributes to be destined for the role. It is true that there are
those who are very naturally suited to leadership, and in a simpler age,
this ethos had more truth in it. It is an old-fashioned perspective and has
less substance for today’s world. Everyone has a view upon leadership, but
very few understand it.
Leadership today is not as simple as being solely about character. The
world is evolving at such pace that leaders need to be prepared to live
in a world which will constantly be uncertain and that will be almost
consistently vulnerable. Some will argue that 9/11 changed the world.
Others that the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution and the globalization
attached changed traditional models and approaches. The pace of change
that has been generated has certainly created new possibilities. Many will
argue that the demands of shareholders have seemed to be ever-more
demanding and have placed increased pressures upon leadership teams.
Society too has changed, and the emerging generations have grown
up in arguably the safest ever environment, which has naturally meant
that they too will think differently to previous generations. In previous
eras, making a good living was the primary objective. The old saying that
“mortgages make mice of men” existed for good reason. Many talk today
about the fear of failure, but in previous generations, one expected to
compromise on one’s aspirations and hopes. Past generations were focused
on lower expectations. One leading Industry CEO started his career as a
chef so as to escape the fate of his brothers in going down the old coal
xvi Introduction
mines. He was driven by a desire to build a life as far away from having to
face that choice and today, having been a very successful leader, he sees his
wealth as the basis for his children to have security and choice; to never
have to face the choices he had to make. This is not an isolated example.
The greatest success of the baby boomer generation has lain in building
wealth and safe environments for their children to have the freedom to
aspire for greater. The irony, of course, is that this has also created the fault
lines and tensions that many have struggled to understand.
Today’s generations are more ambitious and free in their aspirations.
This has had its own consequences as real economics create their own
barriers, but the social change, which has taken place over the last 20
years, needs recognizing. Many of today’s problems have been thirty years
in the making. One can argue that a safe world and strong economies
have allowed poor behaviours to thrive. The traditional pillars, on which
many companies were founded, have been eroded as leaders focused on
a combined focus of increased profit and reduced investment in the core
pillars. Many of the problems that business face today have become an
inevitability of that dual focus.
All the preceding arguments have a level of merit and all have impacted
to create a complex landscape for leaders to navigate.
The millennial generation has come to force as the largest group in
employment today. They have often felt disappointed in the last decade
by the leadership they have experienced, and they have a desire for better.
They are the most educated, diverse, and inclusive generation to emerge
yet, and they are naturally making the arguing for greater change. They
have strong ideals, and they are coming into positions of influence. This
should lead to a far more progressive agenda emerging.
The baby boomer generation, in contrast, has been one of the finest
business generations ever. They have faced a lot of criticism in how they
have struggled to nurture the millennials through. Some of this has been
fair; some not so. The irony is the millennials are a reflection of the baby
boomers and the previous generation, the so called Silent Generation, just
their more personal ideology. The millennials want to live without the
compromises made by their parents. In their mind, that was their choice
and they view a different way forward.
Introduction xvii
as success. The two often run hand-in-hand with one another. If one
aspires to leadership, then it is important to understand this simple fact.
You will need to accept failure and be able to learn from it. From failure
will come success.
Abigail Tan, Chief Executive of the St. Giles Group of Hotels, which runs
hotels in New York, London, Europe, and Malaysia, and who is viewed to
be an emerging leadership voice, noted in an interview for this book that:
concerned about how their own natural weaknesses may be portrayed and
withdrew a step, creating a chasm between leadership and many teams. It
has taken time to learn that most are very forgiving of those weaknesses
and can often relate with something not so far removed from the real
world: a fact that Boris Johnson found during the UK General Election of
2019 when his popularity almost grew within the more sustained attacks
on his character. It did show a gulf between the media and the person on
the street.
It is certainly true that many media reporters have moved from
being commentators on events to being opinion leaders, as this attracts
increased levels of listener, and therefore, impacts on the commercial per-
formance of a media outlet. Media outlets have encouraged their jour-
nalists to develop a voice of their own, which does fly in the face of the
job of reporting on the facts. Opinion has become more important than
objectivity. Is it right that a journalist with very little experience in leader-
ship has the power to influence public opinion against someone who does
carry the burden of responsibility?
It is interesting that during COVID-19, many have turned away from
some of the leading journalists, as trust in their motives have become
questioned.
Of course, leaders need to possess many admirable personal character-
istics, but leadership, quite rightly, is a deeper topic than merely behavior.
It is how leaders are able to bring people together, how they are able to
build trust, and how they are able to gain knowledge in order to be able
to make accurate decisions.
There has been a major debate quietly taking place in the background,
as many do feel that the baby boomer generation has failed in the way,
in that it has not nurtured and developed the millennials and Generation
Z as they themselves were once nurtured. There is a rising voice for a less
self-interested approach to business and a greater focus on building sus-
tainable business for the long term.
Whether this is a fair accusation or not will be debated in the pages
to follow. It is certainly fair to argue that the average age of leaders has
increased, and there does appear to have been a growing distrust of
empowering and more importantly, enabling the young. The average age
of chief executive officers (CEOs) has increased in recent years, and the
xxii Introduction
Abigail Tan’s comments are very apt as once we strip everything back; the
differences between generations are not as great as they may appear, but
the challenge that we face today is to ensure that once again, the emerg-
ing generations are nurtured effectively, and that a marriage between the
generations can be found. Both can learn from one another, and as Abi-
gail Tan notes, if we can build the bridge, then this will lead to dynamic
change.
The role of leadership is posing new questions to all. In hospitality,
there are many new challenges that have emerged from how the role
of asset managers, shareholders, and venture capitalists have impacted
increasingly in the last 20 years to how the customer’s expectations have
changed; employees too.
The following is based on over 100 interviews and discussions with
leading hospitality figures from all across the world during the opening
months of 2020. We would like to thank all those that gave up their time
to give us their thoughts, insights, and opinions.
The aim is to be thought provoking, ask questions of you (the reader)
to reflect upon and represent the views, not of scholars, but of real leaders
from the hospitality industry. There may be much that you do not agree
with in the following and also much that you do. The aim is to challenge
your own understanding of leadership and provide an insight into how
many leaders view the industry and its challenges.
One of the prevailing arguments of many leaders today is that the
knowledge base of many of those emerging is not as strong as it once was.
The argument is that many younger talents are naturally brighter and
even more educated, but the overall knowledge of business and people has
fallen. Whether this is right or wrong will be debated in the pages to fol-
low, but regardless, it is important to help challenge the thinking of each
reader, to help challenge and develop each reader’s own understanding
and confidence in how they view leadership.
The need to develop strong leaders is as central an issue today as it
ever has been, maybe even of more importance. We will argue that often
business in recent years has failed talent, and we ask what more needs to
be done—would what you do to create change?
Has the business environment changed so much in recent years that
infrastructures are struggling to meet that change and are less effective?
xxiv Introduction
“I absolutely believe this is the right message for this time and the
right way that we should behave” (4).
At the end of the day, all leaders are judged by their tenure. How peo-
ple feel safe, economically prosperous, motivated, inspired, cared for—it
is the challenge for all leaders. Reputations are made and lost by how a
leader can bring all this together. It can be fickle, often pressurized, but
few leaders would miss out on the opportunity to lead.
xxvi Introduction
been fast to see weakness as a problem. The result is that often the wrong
characters have become leaders rather than those with real empathy, emo-
tional intelligence, strong value set and understanding of communities
and culture. It is for good reason that trust has been so eroded. It does not
just happen by accident. It is the result of a major fault line.
There are numerous contradictions when it comes to the topic of
“leadership” as leadership is often about a moment in time when one
person brings a group together in pursuit of a common goal. The leader
is the glue and the inspiration to achieve something which is beyond
the norm. Hence why it is often easier to admire the sports captain than
the business or political leader as it is a far simpler landscape to navigate
and understand. Sport is as black and white as winning or losing. Busi-
ness leadership today includes overseeing a large variety of topics from
business performance to diversity to sustainability (economic, cultural,
social, and environmental) to managing the customer experience to talent
development.
Just as life is not as clear cut as black or white so it is with the topic
of leadership. There are many leaders who have been an inspiration for a
short period of time; others who only became leaders when a moment in
time arrived, which brought the best out of them. The heart of leadership
lies in character and it is often developed over time. One could compare
leadership to a fine wine—it improves and matures with age, if nurtured
well, but all can be lost with a simple mistake. However, this is only part
of the overall picture.
Understanding the heart and essence of leadership is part of the learn-
ing. Maybe one of the best examples has been the learning that most have
to do in the field of diversity and inclusion. It has taken a long time to
break down barriers and to educate a broader, more progressive approach
which has delivered strong results. This area alone has not been an
easy journey, but one which has been important as many teams today are
multicultural as well as being multi-disciplined and skilled. That is the
essence of hospitality: a meritocracy and home for all.
Strong managers are often confused with leaders and yet the two skill
sets are very much separate. Management is about detail and organiza-
tion. Leadership is about seeing something which others cannot see and
then leading a team to achieve an objective.
Why Is Leadership of Such Importance? 5
energy to see real change take place. They also believe in the importance
of communities to a greater extent than the baby boom generation. Inter-
estingly, they have been quiet and respectful, waiting for their moment to
be able to create change.
They have lost faith in leadership from the top and instead opted to
find leadership which is more local and more personal. This can help
explain the #MeToo campaign which was, in many ways, a rebellion
against the behaviors of the old school. It also helps to explain why the
“Black Lives Matter” campaign took off with such energy and gathered
such momentum during 2020.
When did this Change take place?
Everyone has a different moment that they can point to. In the UK,
many will point toward the start of the Blair Government (1997–2000)
when so many held a firm belief that Blair would create a genuine momen-
tum of change; that politics would change. When it became clear that this
would not happen, so a disillusionment set in which then came to the fore
with the fallout from the Iraq War.
In the United States, one can argue that the 2000 Election left a
feeling of disillusionment and of course, the Iraq War confirmed this to
many. The Obama presidency promised much but still the much hoped
for change did not quite manifest itself.
It is no coincidence that the genuine movements of the last few years
have had no clear leader: #MeToo, The Extinction Rebellions, even Black
Lives Matter. The cause is championed but there appears to be no figure-
head as was the case in the days of Martin Luther King or with the great
CND marches in London at the start of the 1980s. Does this illustrate
the desire to be part of a community rather than the need to lead? Does it
illustrate the desire for social change but with a difference?
Suddenly what matters is not leadership but real social issues which
do impact on daily life. It was one of the contradictions of the emerging
generations in that they hold a global view but also a very local one.
They want their communities to feel strong, their schools, their hospi-
tals but it is less about the nation as a whole as they have lost trust in
leaders.
They are also more forgiving and want to be led by those who are gen-
uine and authentic so they can find that elusive trust once again. Maybe
Why Is Leadership of Such Importance? 9
many people find trust in those that have weaknesses and are human?
Maybe those who have failed have learnings that can make them better
leaders? Was the world a safer place under Bill Clinton or George W
Bush? How was it that Churchill could achieve something that was clearly
beyond his very able predecessor, Neville Chamberlain (6)?
Why is it that George W Bush has been seen as more friendly, acces-
sible, considered, genuine and almost statesmanlike post being president
than Bill Clinton?
Character is not the result of navigating life’s challenges safely but
often through failure. As Churchill once famously remarked “Success
is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm” (7),
although it has been rumored that Abraham Lincoln too said these words.
One of the challenges today is asking aspiring leaders to be unafraid
to fail so that they can be better; to think more deeply and passionately
about major issues and to have principles that they are willing to take an
active stand for. There is no doubting their passion for environmental and
global issues, but can they be leaders?
The ethos is simple. Leadership cannot be taught just by textbooks;
it needs to be nurtured and developed through exposure to the world
beyond work and home. Potential leaders need to be prepared to fail in
order to succeed. One needs to feel something deep to be able to lead.
This can be pain; it can be passion. Leadership comes from having a desire
and motivation to create change, to stand for something which is bigger
than just oneself.
It has been a major concern in recent decades, almost since the dawn
of digitalization back in the 1980s, that many leaders became one dimen-
sional, focused only on financial results, on wealth and not enough on
people, communities and that leaders had placed genuine and authentic
principles to one side and focused more on “what is in it for me?”
Worse still is that many neither trust their leaders nor feel safe enough
to be able to express themselves or to take risk.
This is not leadership as defined by what many are seeking. There is
little doubt that the 2008–2009 crash has played a major role in building
the chasm between leadership, teams and in eroding trust. It will be inter-
esting to review how historians write about the years 2008–2020 and how
kind they will be to those in leadership roles.
10 A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
When the financial crash of 2008–2009 took place, many noted at the
time that it would be a time to learn key lessons; that leaders would need
to learn from the errors made. At the time, it was described as a major
heart attack to the system which would create the basis for necessary cor-
rection as behaviors had changed with the long period of prosperity.
It was the financial sectors which took the brunt of the criticism. Busi-
ness faced a turbulent period with the “age of austerity” being announced
but the question remains, were any business or leadership lessons from
the 2008–2009 crash learnt? Did the values of those in leadership posi-
tions change and adapt in response to the crisis?
Arguably, behaviors actually declined further. Many directors pro-
tected themselves during the fallout and it was the lower and middle
income levels that faced the worst. Lost employees were replaced by
automated systems, business processes and the gap between the wealth
of senior players and those in middle management actually got greater.
Research shows that the remuneration of senior players during this period
of time doubled whilst the remuneration of middle management only
grew by between 25 and 30 percent over the same period. The argument
was that senior players were being rewarded via greater bonuses on busi-
ness results and returns to the shareholder. A fair argument even if one
dimensional. It would naturally lead to increased self-interest and one
dimensional thinking which focused almost solely on results. Even if this
was understandable to rebuild from the crash, it was clearly not a long-
term, sustainable approach.
Many leaders have spoken with genuine surprise in recent years over
some of the statistics to emerge about the disengagement of employees
and the erosion in trust in leadership teams. It is surely a natural evolution
from the above? It is also natural that today there is a genuine call for bet-
ter leadership, broader vision and a focus on building a business strategy
that embraces both environmental and social sustainability.
Back in 2008–2009, many believed major errors had been made,
that values had eroded and that a new narrative would come to the fore
alongside most companies making a major correction to their approaches.
However, in truth, this did not happen.
One of the leading perspectives, following the crash, was that it was
those in middle and lower income brackets who took the brunt of the
Why Is Leadership of Such Importance? 11
fallout and that very few directors were affected. The change in those at
board level during this period was only at 1 percent higher than what was
the norm each year yet both the UK and the United States faced high
numbers of job losses.
Were lessons learnt? It certainly changed much in financial services
with greater regulation and stricter policies. One would like to think
that the narrative did change in business and society too but little really
changed as it should have done. However, the counter is that it has laid
the ground for change to come now as the emerging generations do see a
different perspective and landscape.
Hospitality has arguably suffered from the impact of this change with
less visible leaders, less accessible leadership and an erosion of investment
in people. There are many that yearn for more visible leadership again,
hoteliers walking the floor and being with their guests, leaders taking
platforms to talk to their people and hospitality ultimately playing a real
role in society again.
And here lies the core challenge and underlines why leadership is so
important today. Hospitality is all about caring for others. It is about an
act of service. It is also about celebrating togetherness through great food,
wine, experiences, and people. It has arguably a genuine opportunity to
play a bigger social role than ever.
If one goes back forty or fifty years, local communities were led by the
local priest, the local doctor, the family lawyer, the bank manager, and
the hospitality manager lagging slightly behind. Since that time, bank
managers have been centralized and no longer play a key social role. The
doctor has withdrawn, as has the lawyer. The church has been eroded by
scandal and change. The irony, of course, is that millennials do want to see
a far greater focus on local communities. The pendulum is swinging back.
The one person left standing is the hospitality manager. Hospitality is
a combination at core of care, people, and togetherness, an ethos which
does make it stand tall and apart. There is a strong argument that cultural
and social sustainability will become ever more important in the years
post Covid-19. Hotels and restaurants can represent their communities;
create a voice that does tell the story of the local culture and community
to a far greater extent than has been the case. Hotels and restaurants can
stand tall for their communities.
12 A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
It was quite a statement. In short, it said that they did not believe that
leaders would be able to collaborate well enough as they placed their
own interests before a common goal. They believed that companies
were simply too competitive with each other and that more could be
gained through collaboration. The success of this venture is still to be
seen but this does not detract from the power of the statement. Many
want to see leaders begin to think bigger and act with greater social
compassion.
The Opportunity
One of the genuine opportunities that the Hospitality Industry possesses
is how to be the center point of communities and be able to play a major
social role. Hospitality does have a role to play in bringing these com-
munities together again post Coronavirus. This is a role that it can play
which is ongoing.
14 A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
I have no doubt that hotels play a key social role in the world and
more in local environments. It is essential to increase our focus
Why Is Leadership of Such Importance? 15
This has happened in sport, for example, the All Blacks rugby team
created two mantras as they became arguably the best team in history.
1. Better people = better players. The more the players were exposed to
real life and other interests, the more they thought for themselves.
They expressed themselves and became better decision makers
when they were playing.
2. The “no d*ckheads” policy. A player could not be an egoist off the
pitch and a team player on the pitch. The Captain, the great Richie
McCaw, would sweep the dressing room floor to both illustrate
humility and also to ensure that everyone was grounded in their
principles. If one of the world’s greatest players could take the time
to show care so could everyone else. (9)
It worked for the All Blacks and made them one of the greatest sports
teams in history. However, the real game changer for them was help-
ing the players to think in a calmer manner under pressure. Pressure has
become a bigger issue as many today seem to struggle that bit more in the
big moments, rewards have become bigger so then naturally everything
intensifies.
When the NZ All Blacks lost to France in the RWC 2007, it is
reported that the management team believed that the players were so
intense about their play that, in moments of pressure, they were unable
Why Is Leadership of Such Importance? 19
to see a bigger picture and remain calm. To change this psychology, they
organized for each of the players to have an involvement in an outside
organization with the view of bringing greater perspective and balance to
their lives. This was to illustrate to the players that although rugby was
almost a religion to them, there are other important things in life too.
The result was a more mature approach to the game, and it did impact on
performances in the big moments within games. The team subsequently
went on to win the next two World Cups in 2011 and 2015.
In the final of 2011, their inspirational leader and captain even played
in a number of games with a broken foot as he understood his responsibil-
ity to hold the team together, to show leadership despite his own personal
pain. They all believed in something bigger than themselves and worked
together to achieve that goal, and were prepared to make sacrifices to
achieve that goal.
Steve Hansen, the Coach of the NZ All Blacks in 2011, reflected in
2020 on this period and said of Richie McCaw:
“Remarkably, even though he knew something was wrong, Hansen
told Wales Online he wasn’t aware of the extent of McCaw’s suffering,
because the coaching staff didn’t want to know, and McCaw didn’t want
to fess up.”
“Our skipper had two broken bones in his foot. We didn’t know they
were broken because we didn’t ask. We didn’t want to know, and he didn’t
want to say,” Hansen said.
“What he did in that tournament was phenomenal. Mentally, he
would be the toughest bloke I have had anything to do with in my coach-
ing career. I think he’s the best rugby player the world has ever seen.” (10)
It is arguably the greatest change over the last one hundred years, an
erosion in the central belief and understanding that one should make
sacrifices for a greater good. It is a language that few talk today. Words
such as honor and duty have gradually been eroded until they seem old
fashioned, but the concept behind them does still hold strong and is once
again becoming popular.
Pause for a moment and ask yourself the question, what would you
feel strongly enough about so that you would be prepared to sacrifice
something of real value? What principle or value would you be prepared
to stand up for, argue for, and campaign for?
20 A Time of Change in Hospitality Leadership
The decline has only taken place since the mid-1980s. Up to that
time, there had been a consistent regularity of protest marches which were
strong and live examples of freedom of speech in action. It has long been
a core principle in western culture and yet had seen a decline from 1985
through to recent times, bar the Iraq war marches in 2003.
The baby boomers grew up in an age of protest marches but there was
a shift in the mid-to-late 1980s which saw a movement toward greater
interest in the “self ” over the common good. It lay the ground for strong
economic performance and greater wealth but as it is with most things,
has the pendulum swung too far away from a good balance and is there a
need to swing back?
The developments in AI and technology have allowed businesses to
cut costs and be far more efficient and controlled. There is a strong view
that those that emerged into the workforce in the late 1990s and early
2000s came into booming markets and, many found progression and
promotion with ease without the knowledge base of previous generations.
How does this relate to business and to hospitality?
One of the common critiques of the modern business environment
today is that as work is influenced to a far greater extent by technol-
ogy and AI, there are many who are far narrower in their thinking and
approach than in previous eras. It has even been estimated that the actual
knowledge level of a senior executive today is 30 percent less than it was
in previous times (11). Even the Bank of England acknowledged in 2017
that many of its forecasts of the impact of the Brexit referendum in 2016
were inaccurate as their own thinking had been too narrow (12). This
was true of organizations all across the business sector. Perspective and
objectivity have become of increasing value and are in declining evidence.
In Hospitality, it goes another step further as the industry does have
a broad social role to play, and it does, as history has proven, have a need
to be constantly inventive and evolving. It requires a breadth of think-
ing and it does need good leaders as often the teams working within the
industry are multicultural and diverse, and need a leader who can bring
them together.
Index
Abigail Tan, xix, xx, xxii, xxiii, Branson, Richard, 151, 182–184
178–181 Brexit referendum, 20, 79
All Blacks rugby team, 18–19 Bridgeman, Kane, 217
Alpha factor, 3–4, 84 Brogan, Bill, 223
Amadeus, 196–198, 216–219 Bush, George W, 9, 22, 23
Anxiety, 75, 80, 94, 121–123 Business, 105–106
Artificial Intelligence (AI), xv, 17, 20, building, 42–43
24, 25, 27, 33, 67–72, 80–81, models and culture, 35–38
89, 93, 214
and business, 72–75 Cafe X, 69
leading expert commentators and Campbell, Grant, 127
he political elite, 78–79 Capitalism, 123–125
loneliness, 75–76 Carte, Richard D’Oyly, 157, 163–164
relationships, 75 Catering and Allied, 189–190
robotics, 77 Chambers, John, 151
social media, 77–78 Character, xviii, xxi, 3, 4, 9, 15, 17,
Austerity, 10, 28, 32, 46, 125 18, 23, 27, 29, 51, 55, 59, 64,
Automated hotels, 69, 70 85, 119, 157, 161, 167, 193,
194, 196–198, 201, 205–208
Baby boomers, xvi, xvii, xxi, xxii, Chef of the Century, The, 166
16–17, 20, 38, 83, 143, 209, Cheney, Dick, 22–23
224, 225 Chief executive officer (CEO), xv, xxi,
Barbarella, 77 xxii, 6, 14, 15, 21, 22, 25–27,
Bate, Paul, 216, 218 33, 36–38, 41, 46, 57, 62, 63,
Baxter, William, 152 68, 72, 79, 84–86, 89, 111,
Behavior, 115–116 114, 119–121, 127, 129–132,
Bellon, Pierre, 157, 169 138, 139, 145, 151, 178, 179
Benaud, Richie, 143–144 Chief financial officer (CFO), 85, 86
Better people = better players, 18 Chief marketing officer (CMO), 85,
Big Bang of 1987, 32 86
Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Churchill, Winston, 3, 9, 35, 45, 165
(BAME), 100–103 Claridge’s, 162–164
Blair, Tony, xviii, 8, 22, 23, 32, 144 Claridge, William, 168
Bloomberg, Michael, 145 Clark, Paul, 121
Boards, 83–84 Clinton, Bill, 3, 9, 23, 32, 35, 144,
CEO, 84–86 208
HR, 85, 86 Colcutt, Thomas Edward, 164
MDs, 85, 86 Collins, Dean, 222
thinking and talent, 87–90 Communication, 6, 23, 29, 62–63,
Bocuse, Paul, 157, 166–168 67, 72, 79–81, 83, 86, 87,
Boothroyd, Betty, 115 128, 153, 160, 207
Boston Consulting Group study, 107 Community, 45–46
242 Index