Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 196 views

    From Jerusalem To Mecca and Back

    Uploaded by

    JerusalemInstitute
    Since 1967, when Israel took over East Jerusalem with its Old City and sacred places, the Islamic perspective of Jerusalem has changed dramatically. A Muslim campaign for liberating Jerusalem from Israeli control was launched in August 1969 following the fire, which was started by an Australian non-Jewish tourist to the structure of the al-Aqsa Mosque. Over the last decade, this campaign has been conducted under the banner “Al-Aqsa is in Danger” with the claim that Jerusalem is “captive” of Jews and therefore Jihad should be carried out to liberate it. This campaign aims to influence the religious emotions and the political awareness the Arab and Muslim communities in the world and mobilize them for political ends. The campaign, which began in Jerusalem, was disseminated to the heart of the Muslim world, which is symbolized by Mecca, and rebounded back by an echo from “Mecca” influencing the political struggle over Jerusalem in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the struggle for “cognition” over Jerusalem, one particular space — the Temple Mount/al-Aqsa compound is in the eye of the storm. This space epitomizes the national strife between two peoples, two nations, which to a great extent is also an ideological battle between two cultures and two religions. Although this most sacred place is administered in practical terms by the Muslim Waqf authorities, Muslims view it as being continuously threatened by the Israeli-Jewish side of the conflict. Jews as well as Muslims regard it as a bone of contention, because it is such a central symbol of identity. Contact the Jerusalem Institute at [email protected]

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    From Jerusalem To Mecca and Back

    Uploaded by

    JerusalemInstitute
    196 views7 pages
    Since 1967, when Israel took over East Jerusalem with its Old City and sacred places, the Islamic perspective of Jerusalem has changed dramatically. A Muslim campaign for liberating Jerusalem from Israeli control was launched in August 1969 following the fire, which was started by an Australian non-Jewish tourist to the structure of the al-Aqsa Mosque. Over the last decade, this campaign has been conducted under the banner “Al-Aqsa is in Danger” with the claim that Jerusalem is “captive” of Jews and therefore Jihad should be carried out to liberate it. This campaign aims to influence the religious emotions and the political awareness the Arab and Muslim communities in the world and mobilize them for political ends. The campaign, which began in Jerusalem, was disseminated to the heart of the Muslim world, which is symbolized by Mecca, and rebounded back by an echo from “Mecca” influencing the political struggle over Jerusalem in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the struggle for “cognition” over Jerusalem, one particular space — the Temple Mount/al-Aqsa compound is in the eye of the storm. This space epitomizes the national strife between two peoples, two nations, which to a great extent is also an ideological battle between two cultures and two religions. Although this most sacred place is administered in practical terms by the Muslim Waqf authorities, Muslims view it as being continuously threatened by the Israeli-Jewish side of the conflict. Jews as well as Muslims regard it as a bone of contention, because it is such a central symbol of identity. Contact the Jerusalem Institute at [email protected]

    Original Title

    From Jerusalem to Mecca and Back

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Since 1967, when Israel took over East Jerusalem with its Old City and sacred places, the Islamic perspective of Jerusalem has changed dramatically. A Muslim campaign for liberating Jerusalem from Israeli control was launched in August 1969 following the fire, which was started by an Australian non-Jewish tourist to the structure of the al-Aqsa Mosque. Over the last decade, this campaign has been conducted under the banner “Al-Aqsa is in Danger” with the claim that Jerusalem is “captive” of Jews and therefore Jihad should be carried out to liberate it. This campaign aims to influence the religious emotions and the political awareness the Arab and Muslim communities in the world and mobilize them for political ends. The campaign, which began in Jerusalem, was disseminated to the heart of the Muslim world, which is symbolized by Mecca, and rebounded back by an echo from “Mecca” influencing the political struggle over Jerusalem in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the struggle for “cognition” over Jerusalem, one particular space — the Temple Mount/al-Aqsa compound is in the eye of the storm. This space epitomizes the national strife between two peoples, two nations, which to a great extent is also an ideological battle between two cultures and two religions. Although this most sacred place is administered in practical terms by the Muslim Waqf authorities, Muslims view it as being continuously threatened by the Israeli-Jewish side of the conflict. Jews as well as Muslims regard it as a bone of contention, because it is such a central symbol of identity. Contact the Jerusalem Institute at [email protected]

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    196 views7 pages

    From Jerusalem To Mecca and Back

    Uploaded by

    JerusalemInstitute
    Since 1967, when Israel took over East Jerusalem with its Old City and sacred places, the Islamic perspective of Jerusalem has changed dramatically. A Muslim campaign for liberating Jerusalem from Israeli control was launched in August 1969 following the fire, which was started by an Australian non-Jewish tourist to the structure of the al-Aqsa Mosque. Over the last decade, this campaign has been conducted under the banner “Al-Aqsa is in Danger” with the claim that Jerusalem is “captive” of Jews and therefore Jihad should be carried out to liberate it. This campaign aims to influence the religious emotions and the political awareness the Arab and Muslim communities in the world and mobilize them for political ends. The campaign, which began in Jerusalem, was disseminated to the heart of the Muslim world, which is symbolized by Mecca, and rebounded back by an echo from “Mecca” influencing the political struggle over Jerusalem in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the struggle for “cognition” over Jerusalem, one particular space — the Temple Mount/al-Aqsa compound is in the eye of the storm. This space epitomizes the national strife between two peoples, two nations, which to a great extent is also an ideological battle between two cultures and two religions. Although this most sacred place is administered in practical terms by the Muslim Waqf authorities, Muslims view it as being continuously threatened by the Israeli-Jewish side of the conflict. Jews as well as Muslims regard it as a bone of contention, because it is such a central symbol of identity. Contact the Jerusalem Institute at [email protected]

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 7

    The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies

    Founded by the Charles H. Revson Foundation

    From Jerusalem to Mecca and Back


    The Islamic Consolidation of Jerusalem

    Yitzhak Reiter

    2005
    The JIIS Studies Series, no. 105

    From Jerusalem to Mecca and Back


    The Islamic Consolidation of Jerusalem

    Yitzhak Reiter

    This book was made possible by funds granted by The Gass Foundation and
    The Charles H. Revson Foundation

    The Statements made and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of
    the author

    © 2005, The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies


    The Hay Elyachar House
    20 Radak St., 92186 Jerusalem

    http://www.jiis.org.il
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Contents

    1. Introduction

    2. Elevation of the Sanctity of al-Aqsa and al-Quds


    2.1 Dynamic Sacredness
    2.2 From al-Haram al-Sharif to al-Aqsa
    2.3 Ancient al-Aqsa
    2.4 Jerusalem as the First Direction of Prayer before the Hijra
    2.5 Muhammad’s Nocturnal Journey and Ascension to Heaven
    2.6 The Obligation to Visit al-Aqsa
    2.7 Jerusalem — Cradle of the Prophets
    2.8 Jerusalem — The Stronghold to Defend Islam
    2.9 Eschatological and Apocalyptical Traditions of Jerusalem

    3. Denial of Authentic Jewish Affiliation to Jerusalem and its Holy Places


    3.1 Brief Jewish Presence
    3.2 The “Alleged” Temple
    3.3 Islamization of the Western Wall and Rejection of Jewish Affiliation

    4. Creating a New Islamic Ethos of Jerusalem


    4.1 Islamization and Arabization of the Pre-Islamic History of the City
    4.2 The ‘Umar Conquest
    4.3 The City’s Continuous Islamic Character
    4.4 Saladin’s Liberation
    4.5 The Link Between al-Quds and Filastin

    5. Islamizing the Struggle over Jerusalem and the Entire Arab-Israeli Conflict
    5.1 The Role of Jewish Actors and the Mirror Syndrome
    5.2 “Al-Aqsa is in Danger” — A Strategy of Political Empowerment
    5.3 Jerusalem Belongs to the Entire Muslim Nation
    5.4 Jihad
    5.5 The Current Saladin’s Myth
    5.6 An Attempt to Construct a Muslim-Christian Alliance
    5.7 The Actors and Agents of Dissemination
    5.8 The Achievements of the Campaign for al-Aqsa and al-Quds
    5.8.1 Raising the Awareness in the Muslim World
    5.8.2 The Activity and Influence of Arab States and of Inter-Arab
    and Inter-Islamic Bodies

    6. Conclusion: Evaluating the Islamic Religious Barrier in the Conflict

    Notes

    Bibliography

    Index
    Abstract

    Since 1967, when Israel took over East Jerusalem with its Old City and sacred
    places, the Islamic perspective of Jerusalem has changed dramatically. A Muslim
    campaign for liberating Jerusalem from Israeli control was launched in August
    1969 following the fire, which was started by an Australian non-Jewish tourist to
    the structure of the al-Aqsa Mosque. Over the last decade, this campaign has been
    conducted under the banner “Al-Aqsa is in Danger” with the claim that Jerusalem
    is “captive” of Jews and therefore Jihad should be carried out to liberate it. This
    campaign aims to influence the religious emotions and the political awareness the
    Arab and Muslim communities in the world and mobilize them for political ends.
    The campaign, which began in Jerusalem, was disseminated to the heart of the
    Muslim world, which is symbolized by Mecca, and rebounded back by an echo
    from “Mecca” influencing the political struggle over Jerusalem in the context of
    the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    In the struggle for “cognition” over Jerusalem, one particular space — the
    Temple Mount/al-Aqsa compound is in the eye of the storm. This space epitomizes
    the national strife between two peoples, two nations, which to a great extent is
    also an ideological battle between two cultures and two religions. Although this
    most sacred place is administered in practical terms by the Muslim Waqf authorities,
    Muslims view it as being continuously threatened by the Israeli-Jewish side of the
    conflict. Jews as well as Muslims regard it as a bone of contention, because it is
    such a central symbol of identity. For Jews, the Temple Mount is the utmost sacred
    place, with its outer Western Wall (Hakotel) symbolizing the original structure of
    the Second Temple (destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE). In their daily ritual and
    liturgy, it is a place that during 2000 years of exile they have aspired to return to
    and re-build. For the Muslims al-Aqsa is mentioned in the Quran as the destination
    of the Prophet Muhammad’s nocturnal journey and being interpreted and identified
    with the place of the rock (or foundation stone) in Jerusalem. According to tradition
    Muhammad ascended to heaven from this place, and the first direction of prayer
    before Mecca. Nowadays, for both communities, Jewish Israelis and Palestinian
    Muslims regardless of the level of their religious observation this compound has
    become a central symbol of identity which both political and religious actors seek
    to mobilize to achieve their political ends.

    v
    This study addresses the question of whether the issue of Jerusalem and the
    holy places are an unsolvable component in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It also
    asks: to what extent religious symbols and the religion per se are obstacles
    hampering the accomplishment of peace. Using 62 academic and semi-academic
    books published in Arabic in nine countries, most of them from the Middle East,
    as well as Islamic internet web sites, legal opinions (fatwas) and the press leads to
    the conclusion that in the last 35 years a new Islamic ethos of Jerusalem was
    developed in the Muslim World.
    The current ethos is based on three processes which have developed
    simultaneously : first, there is a strong trend of elevating the sacredness of the al-
    Aqsa compound and Jerusalem as a whole in contemporary Islam; second, the
    denial of the Jewish “ “other’s” theological and historical affiliation to the city
    and to its sacred places; and third, constructing and “imagining” a new Jerusalem-
    based ancient history as a primordial element of identity according to which the
    ancient Yebusites who established Jerusalem as “Yevus” were Arab (some say:
    Palestinian) tribes who roamed the country, thousands of years before the Hebrews
    arrived in Canaan - ancient Palestine. One of the new myths developed in this
    Islamic discourse is a belief in the cyclic trend of history of which Saladin is an
    image for an Islamic re-liberation of Jerusalem from the new “Jewish Crusaders”.
    Some of the phenomenon of using religious symbols for political consolidation
    reflects a mirror image of the Israeli Jewish side, and the study also points to
    Jewish challenges that exacerbated the Islamic campaign for Jerusalem. However,
    the author concludes that whereas in the Israeli camp this process characterizes
    only radical Jewish groups, analyzing the current public discourse of religious
    figures, politicians, academics and journalists in the Muslim World leads to the
    conclusion that the new ethos today reflects the mainstream in many Islamic
    communities around the world.
    Is Jerusalem an obstacle to achieving peace? From the Islamic point of view,
    there are four main factors: first, the consistent Palestinian position which rejects
    any attempt to introduce Jewish worship on any inch of the Temple Mount/al-
    Aqsa compound; second, the Palestinian-formed message according which
    Jerusalem belongs to the entire Muslim nation; third, the position expressed by
    many Islamic religious organizations that there can be no compromise on Jerusalem;
    and finally, the mis-evaluation of both Israelis and Palestinians of the position of

    vi
    the other side, of the supreme esteem the “other” feels toward its sacred places as
    not only a place of worship but as a central symbol of identity, and of the expectation
    that the “ other’s real position is more flexible, whereas, in reality, it is not.
    Palestinian politicians believe that in the final analysis, Israelis would agree to a
    trade-off between Jewish administration of the Western Wall and the Jewish Quarter
    in exchange for complete Muslim sovereignty over the al-Aqsa compound and
    the rest of the Old City. Israelis, on the other hand believe that the Clinton parameters
    of July 2000 of a residual Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount or a spatial
    division could be accepted by the Palestinians. The fact that Israelis raised this
    option at the second Camp David summit is one example of the Israeli mis-
    evaluation of the Palestinian preparedness to compromise, which is almost zero.
    Therefore, a spatial or a functional division of the Temple Mount/al-Aqsa compound
    between Israelis and Palestinians is apparently not possible.
    Having said this, one should remember that in the precedents of signing peace
    accords between Israel and Arab entities, there were always Islamic high-ranking
    religious figures, who have supported political decisions with a theological legal
    opinion. The author concludes by recommending further investigation in two
    directions which he sees as a key to resolve the conflict: one, the involvement of a
    third party in monitoring or controlling the Old City for at least a transitional
    period; two, the development and public dissemination of texts, traditions and
    beliefs that give legitimacy to the importance of Jerusalem and its holy places to
    all three great religions.

    vii

    You might also like