3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam 3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 146

3 Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

3.
BENDING OF HOMOGENEOUS BEAMS
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
S G O
DESIGN OF TENSION
S O REINFORCED
O C REC.
C BEAMS
S
DESIGN AIDS
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN
REC. BEAMS WITH TEN. AND COMP. REBAR
T BEAMS

447.327
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab. I
Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam

Typical Structures

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
BENDING OF HOMOGENEOUS BEAMS

Concrete is homogeneous?
Reinforced Concrete is homogeneous?

The fundamental principles in the design and analysis of


reinforced concrete are the same as those of homogeneous
structural material.

Two components
Internal forces normal to the section - flexure
at any cross section tangential to the section - shear

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

1. A cross section that was plane before loading remains


plane under load
F unit strain in a beam above and below the neutral
axis are proportional to the distance from that axis;
strain distribution is linear G Bernoulli’s hypothesis
( not true for deep beams)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

2. Concrete is assumed to fail in compression,


when εc = εcu (limit state) = 0
0.003
003

3. Stress-strain relationship
p of reinforcement is assumed to
be elastoplastic (elastic-perfectly plastic).
G Strain hardening effect is neglected

4. Tensile strength of concrete is neglected for calculation


of flexural strength.
strength

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design
cf.)
f ) Typicall s-s curve off h
homogeneous materiall

proportional

not proportional

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Basic Assumptions in Flexural Design

5. Compressive stress-strain relationship for concrete


may be assumed to be any shape (rectangular
(rectangular,
trapezoidal, parabolic, etc) that results in an
acceptable
p prediction
p of strength.
g
G Equivalent rectangular stress distribution

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Behavior of RC beam under increasing load

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Behavior of RC beam under increasing load
ent
Mome

ε M
φ= =
y EI
Curvature

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Elastic uncracked Section
not homogeneous homogeneous

uncracked
transformed
section

As (n-1)As
In elastic range
fc fs Es
εc = = εs = F fs = f c = nff c
Ec Es Ec
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Example 3.1 (SI unit)
250
A rectangular beam
As = 1,520 mm2
fcu = 27 MPa (cylinder strength)
600
fr = 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) 650

fy = 400 MPa

Calculate the stresses caused by a D25


bending moment M = 60 kN kN·m
m (unit: mm)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Solution
250

Es 2.0 ×105
n= = = 7.84
7 84 ≈ 8
Ec 8,500 3 f cu
650 600

(n − 1) As = 7 ×1,520 = 10, 640 mm 2


transformed area of rebars

D25
transformed section

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Solution
Assuming the uncracked section
section,
250
neutral axis
bh 2
+ (n − 1) As d
Qx ∫ ydA
dA
y= = = 2
650 600
A ∫ dA bh + (n − 1) As
= 342 mm
3
bh ⎛h ⎞
I x = ∫ y 2 dA = + ⎜ − y ⎟ bh
12 ⎝ 2 ⎠
D25 + (d − y ) 2 (n − 1) As
transformed section = 6, 477 × 106 mm 4
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Solution
Compressive stress of concrete 250
at the top fiber
M
fc = y = 3.17 MPa
Ix
650 600
Tension stress of concrete
at the bottom fiber
M
f ct = (h − y ) = 2.85 MPa < fr
Ix
D25
Assumption of uncracked, transformed section is justified !!

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Solution
Stress in the tensile steel 250

M
f s = n (d − y ) = 19.12
19 12 MPa
MP
Ix

650 600
Compare fc and fs with fcu and
fy respectively!!!

D25

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Elastic Cracked Section

This situation is under service load state


1
• ctf > f r • f c < f ck • fs < f y
2
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Elastic Cracked Section
To determine neutral axis
kd (1)
b(kd ) − nAs (d − kd ) = 0
2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Elastic Cracked Section
Tension & Comp. force
fc
C = b((kd
kd ) T = As f s (2)
2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Elastic Cracked Section
Bending moment about C
M = T ( jd ) = As f s ( jd ) (3)
M
F fs = (4)
As ( jd )
Bending moment about T
fc
M = C ( jd ) = b(kd )( jd ) (5)
2
22M
M
F fc = (6) How to get k and j ?
kjbd 2
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Elastic Cracked Section
As
Defining ρ= Then, As = ρbd (7)
bd
kd
Substitute (7) into (1) and solve for k b(kd ) − nAs (d − kd ) = 0
2
k = ( ρn) 2 + 2 ρn − ρn (8)

cf.)
f) jdd = d − kd / 3

k See Handout #3
#3-3
3
F j = 1−
3 Table A.6
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Example 3.2 (Quiz)
The beam of Example 3.1 is subjected to a bending
moment M=120 kN·m (rather than 60 kN·m as previously).

Calculate the relevant properties and stress right away!!

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Flexural Strength

f av
α= (9)
f ck
fav = ave. compressive
stress on the area bc

C = αf ck bc
b ( )
(10)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Flexural Strength

α
0.72 fck ≤ 28 MPa
decrease by 0.04 for every 7 MPa 28 MPa ≤ fck ≤ 56 MPa
0.56 fck > 56 MPa
β
0.425 fck ≤ 28 MPa
decrease by 0.025 for every 7 MPa 28 MPa ≤ fck ≤ 56 MPa
0.325 fck > 56 MPa
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Flexural Strength
This values apply to compression zone with other cross
sectional shapes (circular, triangular, etc)
However, the analysis of those shapes becomes complex.
Note that to compute the flexural strength of the section
section, it
is not necessary to know exact shape of the compression
stress block. Only need to know C and its location.
These two quantities are expressed in α and β .

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Flexural Strength

G The higher compressive strength, the more brittle.


Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Flexural Strength
Tension failure (εu<0.003, fs =fy)
Equilibrium
C =T αf ck bc = As f s (11)

Bending moment

M = Tz = As f s (d − βc) (12)

or M = Cz = α f ck bc(d − β c) (13)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Tension failure (εu<0.003, fs =fy)
Neutral axis at steel yielding, fs = fy

As f y ρf y d
From Eq.(11) c= = (14)
αf ck b αf ck
Nominal bending moment
⎛ ρ f yd ⎞
M n = As f y ( d − β c ) = ρ bdf y ⎜ d − β ⎟
⎝ α f ck ⎠

2⎛
ρ fy ⎞ 2⎛
ρ fy ⎞
= ρ f y bd ⎜1 − β ⎟ = ρ f y bd ⎜1 − 0.59
0 59 ⎟ (15)
⎝ α f ck ⎠ ⎝ f ck ⎠
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

Flexural Strength
Compression failure (εu=0.003, fs < fy)
Hook’ss law
Hook
f s = ε s Es (16)

from strain diagram


d −c
f s = ε u Es (17)
c
Equilibrium
d −c
α f ck bc = As f s = Asε u Es (18)
c
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Compression failure (εu=0.003, fs < fy)
Solving the quadratic for c

αf ckk bc 2 + Asε u Es c − Asε u Es d = 0 (19)

c= (20)

fs = (21)

N i l bending
Nominal b di momentt

Mn = (22)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR

Flexural Strength
Balanced reinforcement ratio ρb
The amount of reinforcement necessary for beam fail to
by crushing of concrete at the same load causing the
steel to yield; (εu=0.003,
0.003, fs =fy)
• ρ < ρb lightly reinforced, tension failure, ductile
• ρ = ρb balanced, tension/comp. failure
• ρ > ρb heavilyy reinforced, compression
p failure, brittle

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Balanced reinforcement ratio ρb
Balanced condition
fy
fs = f y εy = (23)
Es
d −c
Substitute Eq. (23) into Eq.(17) f s = ε u Es
c
εu
c= d (24)
εu + ε y
Substitute Eq. (24) into Eq.(11) αf ck bc = As f s
αf ck εu
ρb = (25)
f y εu + ε y
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Example 3.3 (SI unit)
250
A rectangular beam
As = 1,520 mm2
fcu = 27 MPa (cylinder strength)
600
fr = 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) 650

fy = 400 MPa

Calculate the nominal moment Mn D25


at which the beam will fail.
fail (unit: mm)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Solution
Check whether this beam fail in tension or compression

As 1 520
1,520
ρ= = = 0.0101
bd (250)(600)
α f ck εu (0.72)(27) 0.003
ρb = = = 0.0292 > ρ
fy εu + ε y 400 0.003 + 0.002

F The beam will fail in tension by yielding of the steel

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHAVIOR
Solution
Using Eq. (15) for tension failure

⎛ ρ fy ⎞
M n = ρ f y bd ⎜1 − 0.59
2

⎝ f ck ⎠
⎛ (0 0101)(400) ⎞
(0.0101)(400)
= (0.0101)(400)(250)(600) ⎜1 − 0.59
2

⎝ 27 ⎠
= 332 kN ⋅ m

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Korea’s design method is Ultimate Strength Design.


called as Limit States Design in the US and Europe
1. Proportioning for adequate strength
2. Checking the serviceability
:deflections/crack width compared against limiting values

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution


is called as Whitney’s Block (Handout #3-1)
What if the actual stress block is replaced by an
equivalent rectangular stress block for compression zone.

Actual Equivalent

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution
Go to Cactual = αf ck bc = γf ck ab = Cequi.
P.25
αc
F γ=
a
G a = β1c
α
γ= γdepends
β1 on α,β
a
= βc
2
G a = β1c
β1 = 2 β
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution
fck, MPa
< 28 35 42 49 56 ≤
α 0.72 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.56
β 0.425 0.400 0.375 0.350 0.325
β1=2 β 0.85 0.801 0.752 0.703 0.654
γ= α/ β1 0.857 0.849 0.851 0.853 0.856

- γ is essentially independent of fck.


- β1 = 0.85 0 007 (fck -28)
0 85 - 0.007×( 28) and
d 0.65
0 65 ≤ β1 ≤ 0.85
0 85

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Equivalent Rectangular Stress Distribution
- KCI 6.2.1(6) allows other shapes for the concrete stress
block to be used in the calculations as long
g as theyy result
in good agreement with test results.
- KCI6.2.1(5) makes a further simplification. Tensile
stresses in the concrete may be neglected in the cals.
G Contribution of tensile stresses of the concrete below
N.A. is very small.

Concrete Stress Distribution in Ultimate Strength Design”


“Concrete Design
Handout #3-2 by Hognestad
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Balanced Strain Condition


steel strain is exactly equal to εy and
concrete simultaneouslyy reaches εu =0.003

Eq. (24)
εu
c= d
εu + ε y

Equilibrium C=T

As f y = ρbbd f y = 0.85 f ck ab = 0.85 f ck β1cb

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS

Balanced Strain Condition

Balanced reinforcement ratio


f ck c f ck ε u
ρb = 0.85β1 = 0.85β1 (26)
f yd f y εu + ε y

Apply εu =0.003 and Es=200,000 MPa


f ck 0.003 f ck 600
ρb = 0.85β1 = 0.85β1 (27)
fy fy f y 600 + f y
0 003 +
0.003
Es
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Underreinforced Beams
In actual practice, ρ should be below ρb for the reasons,
1. Exactly ρ= ρb, then concrete reaches the comp. strain limit and steel
reaches its yield stress
stress.
2. Material properties are never known precisely.
failure, although ρ may be
3 Strain hardening can cause compressive failure
3.
somewhat less than ρb.
4. The actual steel area provided, will always be equal to or larger than
required based on ρ.
5. The extra ductility provided by low ρ provides warning prior to failure.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
By the way, how to guarantee underreinforced beams?
F KCI Code provides,
(1) The minimum tensile reinforcement strain allowed at
nominal strength
g in the design
g of beam.
(2) Strength reduction factors that may depend on the
tensile strain at nominal strength.
g
Note Both limitations are based on the net tensile strain εt
of the rebar farthest from the compression face at the
depth dt. (d ≤ dt)
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
(1) For nonprestressed flexural members and members with factored
axial compressive load less than 0.1fckAg, εt shall not be less than 0.004
((KCI 6.2.2(5))
( ))

Substitute dt for d and εt for εy


εu dt − c
c= d F εt = εu
εu + ε y c
f ck ε u f ck ε u
ρb = 0.85β1 F ρ = 0.85β1
f y εu + ε y f y εu + εt
The reinforcement ratio to
produce a selected εt
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
Maximum reinforcement ratio (KCI 2007)
f ck ε u f εu
ρ max = 0.85β1 = 0.85β1 ck (29)
f y εu + εt f y ε u + 0.004

Cf.) (prior to KCI 2007 ρ max = 0.75ρb (28)


& ACI 2002)
F εt = 0.00376 at ρ= 0.75ρb for fy=400 MPa.
F 0.00376 < 0.004 ,i.e., KCI 2007 is slightly conservative.
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
εu = 0.003 εu = 0.003 εu = 0.003

dt

εt = 0.002 εt = 0.004 εt = 0.005


c 0 003
0.003 c 0 003
0.003 c 0 003
0.003
= = 0.600 = = 0.429 = = 0.375
dt 0.003 + 0.002 dt 0.003 + 0.004 dt 0.003 + 0.005

Compression Minimum Tension


controlled net strain controlled
member for flexural member
member
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
(2) Compression Transition Tension
controlled zone controlled

Φ = 0.85

Spiral
Φ = 0.70 + (εt - 0.002) 0.85

Φ = 0.70
0 70 Other Φ = 0.65 + (εt - 0.002)) 200/3
/

Φ = 0.65

εt = 0.002 εt = 0.005

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
Nominal flexural strength

⎛ a⎞
M n = As f y ⎜ d − ⎟ (30)
⎝ 2⎠
As f y
a= (31)
0.85 f ck b
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Example 3.4 (the same as Ex.3.3)
250
A rectangular beam
As = 1,520 mm2
fcu = 27 MPa (cylinder strength)
600
fr = 3.5 MPa (modulus of rupture) 650

fy = 400 MPa

Calculate the nominal strength Mn D25


using the equivalent stress block. (unit: mm)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Maximum reinforcement ratio
f ckk εu
ρ max = 0.85β1
f y ε u + 0.004
(27) 0.003 As
= (0.85)(0.85)
(0 85)(0 85) = 00.0209
0209 > 00.0101
0101 =
(400) 0.003 + 0.004 bd

F This beam is underreinforced (tension controlled)


and will fail yielding of the steel

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Depth of stress block
As f y (1520)(400)
a= = = 106 mm
0.85 f ck b (0.85)(27)(250)

Nominal Strength
⎛ a⎞ ⎛ 106 ⎞
M n = As f y ⎜ d − ⎟ = (1520)(400) ⎜ 600 − ⎟ = 333 kN ⋅ m
⎝ 2⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
C
Compare this
thi with
ith Example
E l 3.3
3 3 !!!
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Nominal flexural strength (Alternative)
Eq(31) can be written w.r.t. ρ

ρ f yd
a= (32)
0.85 f ck

Nominal flexural strength

⎛ ρ f yd ⎞ 2⎛
ρ fy ⎞
M n = ( ρ bd ) f y ⎜ d − ⎟ = ρ f y bd ⎜1 − 0.59 ⎟ (33)
⎝ 1.7 f ck ⎠ ⎝ f ck ⎠
A s
a/2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Nominal flexural strength (Alternative)
simplified expression of Eq.(33)

M n = Rbd 2 (34)

where,, ρ fy
R = ρ f y (1 − 0.59
0 59 ) (35)
f ck

flexural resistance factor R depends on


1. reinforcement ratio
2. material properties (Handout #3-3)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Design flexural strength
KCI Code Provisions
a
φ M n = φ As f y (d − )
2
ρ fy
= φρ f y bd (1 − 0.59
2
0 59 ) (36)
f ck

= φ Rbd 2 (37)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code Provisions for Underreinforced Beam
Compression Transition Tension
controlled zone controlled

Φ = 0.85

Spiral
Φ = 0.70 + (εt - 0.002) 0.85

Φ = 0.70
0 70 Other Φ = 0.65 + (εt - 0.002)) 200/3
/

Φ = 0.65

εt = 0.002 εt = 0.005

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Example 3.4 (continued)
Calculate the design moment capacity for the beam
analyzed in Example 3.4

Hint net tensile strain should be known.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
a 106
c= = = 125 mm
β1 0.85
dt − c 600 − 125
F εt = εu = 0.003 = 0.0114 > 0.005
c 125
F strength reduction factor is 0.85!!!

Design strength φ M n = (0.85)(333) = 283 kN ⋅ m

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Minimum Reinforcement Ratio
; very lightly reinforced beams will also fail without warning
warning.
so, lower limit is required.
Rectangular cross section

0.15 f ck (38)
As.min = bd
fy

Proof
Equating the cracking moment to the flexural strength, based under
the assumptions,
assumptions h=1.1d
h=1 1d and internal lever arm = 0.95d
0 95d

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Proof
• cracking moment Mcr
M cr = z ⋅ f r = As ⋅ f y ⋅ (internal lever arm)

⎛ bh 2 ⎞
F ⎜
⎝ 6 ⎠
( )
⎟ 0.63 f ck = As f y ( 0.95d )

b(1.1d ) 2 (0.63 f ck )
F As.min =
(0 95d ) f y (6)
(0.95

0.134 f ck bd 0.15 f ck bd
= ≈
fy fy
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Minimum Reinforcement Ratio
Similarly, T cross secton

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Similarly, T cross secton
Flange in compression
0 22 f ck
0.22
As ,min = bw d (39)
fy

Flange in tension

0 50 f ck
0.50
As ,min = bw d (40)
fy

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code provisions (6.3.2)

0.25 f ck 1.4
As ,min = bw d ≥ bw d (41)
fy fy
,where bw=b, if rectangular cross section.

Exception (KCI 6.3.2 (2)) ~statically determinate T beam


with a flange in tension, Eq.(41) replaced bw by either b
(effective flange width) or 2bw, whichever is smaller.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
KCI Code provisions (6.3.2)
cf.) can be expressend w.r.t. reinforcement ratio

0 25 f ck
0.25 1.44
1
ρ min = ≥
fy fy

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Example 3.5 (analysis problem)
Rectangular beam b=300 mm, d=440 mm
Reinforced with four D29 in a row.
fy=400 MPa, fck=27 MPa
What is the maximum moment that will be utilized
in design, according to the KCI code?

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
From Table A.2 of Handout #3-3 As = 2,570 mm 2

ρ = 2,570 /(300)(440)
/( )( ) = 0.0195

f ck εu
ρ max 0 85β1
= 0.85
f y ε u + 0.004
27 0 003
0.003
= (0.85)(0.85) = 0.0209 > ρ
400 0.003 + 0.004
F Thi b
This beam will
ill fail
f il by
b tensile
t il yielding
i ldi
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Nominal strength for this underreinforced beam

As f y (2,570)(440)
(2 570)(440)
a= = = 149 mm
0.85 f ck b (0.85)(27)(300)

⎛ a⎞ ⎛ 149 ⎞
M n = As f y ⎜ d − ⎟ = (2,570)(400) ⎜ 440 − ⎟ = 376 kN ⋅ m
⎝ 2⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Strength reduction factor φ?

a149
c= = = 175 mm
β1 0.85
dt − c 440 − 175
F εt = εu = 0.003 = 0.00454 < 0.005
c 175
F strength reduction factor is not 0.85!!!
200
F φ = 0.65
0 65 + (ε t − 00.002)
002) = 00.82
82
3
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Design strength

φ M n = (0.82)(376)
(0 82)(376) = 308 kN ⋅ m

Check minimum reinforcement ratio

0.25 f ck 1.4
ρ min = ≥
fy fy
0.25 27 1.4
= ≥ = 0.0035 < 0.0195 = ρ
400 400
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Overreinforced Beams
Occasionally it is necessary to calculate the flexural
strength of an overreinforced (fs<fy) beams.
Such as, analysis of existing structures.

fs

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Overreinforced Beams

steel strain
d −c
ε s = εu (42)
c
equilibrium
0.85β1 f ck bc = As ⋅ f s = ρ bd ⋅ ε s Es

substitute Eq.(42) into above Eq. and define ku=c/d


k u 2 + m ρ ku − m ρ = 0

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Overreinforced Beams
where, ρ=As/bd and m is material parameter
Es ε u
m= (43)
0.85β1 f ck

solving the quadratic equation

mρ 2 mρ
ku = m ρ + ( ) −
2 2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Overreinforced Beams

neutral axis depth c


c = ku d

stress-block
stress block depth a
a = β1c

nominal flexural strength


a a
M n = As f s (d − ) = As ( Esε s )(d − ) (44)
2 2
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN AIDS
In practice, AIDS is very useful for both analysis & design

1st approach for design


1 Set
1. S t th
the required
i d strength
t th equall to
t th
the d
design
i strength
t th
M u = φ M n = φ Rbd 2
2. Select an appropriate reinforcement ratio between
ρmin and ρmax from Table A.4
Often a ratio of about 0.5 ρb will be an economical
and practical choice.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN AIDS
1st approach for design
3. Find the flexural resistance factor from Table A.5, then
Mu
bd =
2

φR
4. Choose b and often an effective depth
p about 2~3 times is
appropriate
5. Calculate the required steel area
As = ρ bd

6 Choose the size and number of bars from Table A


6. A.2
2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN AIDS
1st approach for design
7. Check that the selected beam will provide room for the
bars chosen, with adequate concrete cover and
spacing

2nd approach for design


1 Select b and d. Then calculate the required R
1.
Mu
R=
φ bd 2
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN AIDS
2nd approach for design
2. Find reinforcement ratio to meet the required R from
Table A.5.
3. Calculate the required steel area.
As = ρ bd

4. Select the size and number of bars from Table A.2.


5 Check
5. Ch k that
th t th
the b
beam width
idth is
i sufficient
ffi i t to
t contain
t i the
th
selected reinforcement.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN
Concrete Protection for Reinforcement

cover thickness
; thickness of concrete cover outside of the outermost steel

minimum concrete cover (KCI Code 5.4)


; To provide the steel with adequate concrete protection
against
g fire and corrosion.

Make a hard copy of KCI Code 5.4 and


attach
h it
i on the
h next page!!
!!
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN
Concrete Protection for Reinforcement
40mm min.

D13 stirrup

40mm min.
D13 ~ D32

65 mm
25 mm 20mm min.
40mm min.
D10 or D13
65 mm

Beam with stirrups Slab


Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN
Concrete Proportions
Maximum material economy ;
p d = 2~3 times the width b
effective depth

but, not always satisfy maximum structural economy

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN
Selection of Bars and Bar Spacing
- Often desirable to mix bar sizes to meet As more closely.
; limiting the variation in diameter of bars in a single layer
- Clear distance between adjacent bars shall not be less
than the nominal bar diameter or 25mm ((KCI Code 5.3.2))
- Max. number of bars in a beam of given width is limited.
; Table A.7 is limiting the maximum width of beam for a
single layer of bars based on bar size and stirrup size.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN

Selection of Bars and Bar Spacing


- The minimum number of bars in a single layer
to control the flexural crack width. Table A.8
- In large girders and columns, it is sometimes
advantageous to bundle rebars with two, three, or four
bars. (KCI Code 5.3.2)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Example 3.6 (design problem)
Find the cross section of concrete and area of steel
required for a simply supported rectangular beam.
- span = 4.5 m
- dead load = 19 kN/m
/
- live load = 31 kN/m
- fck = 27 MPa
- fy = 400 MPa

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
load combination (KCI 3.3.2(1))

wu = 1.2 D + 1.6 L = (1.2)(19) + (1.6)(31) = 72.4 KN / m

wu l 2 (72.4)(4.5)
(72 4)(4 5) 2
Mu = = = 183.3 KN ⋅ m
8 8

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
determination of cross section
; depends on designer
designer’ss choice of reinforcement ratio
; to minimize the concrete section, select the maximum
permissible ρ
; to maintain φ=0.85, the maximum reinforcement ratio
corresponding
di to
t a nett ttensile
il strain
t i off 0
0.005
005 will
ill be
b
selected Why do not use ρmax with εt=0.004 ?

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
1. reinforcement ratio for εt=0.005
f ck εu 2 27 0 003
0.003
ρ = 0.85β1 = (0.85) = 0.0183
f y ε u + 0.005 400 0.003 + 0.005

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
2. Setting the required flexural strength equal to
the design flexural strength
ρ fy
M u = φ M n = φρ f y bd (1 − 0.59
2
)
f ck
⎛ (0.0183)(400) ⎞
F (183.3)(10 ) = (0.85)(0.0183)(400)bd ⎜1 − 0.59
6 2

⎝ 27 ⎠
F bd 2 = 35, 070, 000 mm3

be careful at UNIT!
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
3. Select an adequate width and height, as
b=220 mm and d=400 mm bd2=35,200,000
, , mm2
b=200 mm and d=420 mm bd2=35,280,000 mm2
.
.
.
See calculation.xls

F b=200 mm and d=420 mm are selected.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
determination of the reinforcement amount
A
1. s
1 = ρ bd = (0
(0.0183)(200)(420)
0183)(200)(420) = 1,537
1 537 mm 2

2. 4@D22=1,548 mm2
3@D25=1,520 mm2
2@D32=1,522 mm2 See Handout #3-3 Table A.2

3 assuming
3. i concrete
t cover = 70mm,
70 then
th h=490mm
h 490

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Check cover and bar spacing
40mm min
min.

40+10+32+32+32+10+40
D13 stirrup
=196
196 mm < 200 mm O.K.
OK
40mm min.
D13 ~ D32

65 mm

40mm min.

65 mm

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution

<Iterative Method>
1. assuming a reasonable value of a is equal to 135 mm

a
M u = φ M n = φ As f y (d − ) (36)
2
(183.3)(106 )
F As = = 1,529mm 2
(0.85)(400)(420 − 135 / 2)
Compare with 1
1,537mm
537mm2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution

2. checking the assumed a See calculation.xls


As f y (1529)(400)
a= = = 133 mm ≈ 135 mm
0.85 f ck b (0.85)(27)(200)

Note
1. A d a is
1 Assumed i very close
l to the
h calculated
l l d
2. No further calculation require
3 This method converges very rapidly
3.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Solution
Note
• Infinite number of solutions exist.
exist
• ρ min ≤ ρ ≤ ρ max
• LLarger cross section
ti + less
l reinforcement
i f t can be
b
economical and reduce deflection.
• Simplicity of construction should be considered
in selection of reinforcement.
0 50 ρ max ≤ ρ ≤ 00.75
• Economical design typically have 0.50 75ρ max

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
DESIGN OF TENSION REINFORCED REC. BEAMS
Example 3.7 ~ 3.11

Example_Solution_1.pdf

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
SUMMARY
Under Reinforced Section
Steel may reach its yield strength before
f the concrete
reaches its maximum. (f ’=f , ε ’= ε )
c ck c u

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
SUMMARY
Balanced Section
Steel reaches yield at same time as concrete reaches
ultimate strength. (fc’=fck, εc’= εu)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
SUMMARY
Over Reinforced Section
Concrete may fail
f before
f the the yield off steel due to the
presence of a high percentage of steel in the section.
(fc’=f
’ fck, εc’=
’ εu)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
SUMMARY

most desirable

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Why Compression Steels are Needed?

1. To increase the compression resistance of a beam of


which dimension is limited by architectural or the
other consideration.
2 To reduce long-term
2. long term deflections of members.
members
; transferring load to compression steel induces the
reduction
educt o of o compressive
co p ess e ststress
ess in co
concrete
c ete a
and
d less
ess
creep.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Why Compression Steels are Needed?

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Why Compression Steels are Needed?

3. For minimum-moment loading (Sec 12.2)


; according to the applied load,
load occasionally negative
moment can occur.
4 To increase ductility
4. ductility.
; additional steel reduces stress block depth, along
with
t tthe
e increase
c ease o of stee
steel st
strain.
a
F larger curvature

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Why Compression Steels are Needed?

5. For the ease of fabrication


; a role as stirrup
stirrup-support
support bars continuous throughout
the beam span.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Comparison Singly RB and Doubly RB
ε cu

A's c2
c1

As As

ε s1
Section 1 Section 2
ε s2
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Comparison Singly RB and Doubly RB
Section 1 Section 2

As f s As f s − As' f s'
c1 = c2 =
0.85 f ck bβ1 0.85 f ck bβ1

Additional As’ strengthens compression zone so that less


concrete is needed
d d to resist a given force.
f
F N.A. goes up and steel strain increases.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Failure Types of Doubly Reinforced Beams
1. Both tension and compression steels yield.
2 Tension
2. T i steel
t l yields
i ld but
b t compression
i steel
t l does
d not.
t
3. Tension steel does not yield but compression steel does.
4. Neither tension nor compression steel yield.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Tension and Comp. Steel Both at Yield Stress

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Tension and Comp. Steel Both at Yield Stress
If ρ ≤ ρb Effect of compression steel can be disregarded,
since such a beam will be controlled byy steel
yielding.
G Internal lever arm of the resisting moment is little
affected by the presence of the compression bar

If ρ > ρb Beam should be considered as a doubly


reinforced beam.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Tension and Comp. Steel Both at Yield Stress
The total resistance force (Mn)
= Mn1 by As’ + Mn2 by (As – As’))

M n1 = As' f y (d − d ' ) (45)


a
M n2 = ( As − A ) f y (d − )
'
s (46)
2
the depth of stress block
( As − As' ) f y
a= ( )
(47)
0.85 f ck b
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Tension and Comp. Steel Both at Yield Stress
apply As= ρbd and As’= ρ’bd
(ρ − ρ ' ) f y d
a= (47)
0.85 f ck

total nominal resisting moment

M n = M n1 + M n 2
a
= As' f y (d − d ' ) + ( As − As' ) f y (d − ) (48)
2
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Tension and Comp. Steel Both at Yield Stress
balanced reinforcement ratio
ρb = ρb + ρ ' (49)

,where ρb is balanced reinforcement ratio of singly reinforced beam.


(Eq (27))
(Eq. ρb = 0.85β1
f ck ε u f
= 0.85β1 ck
600
f y εu + ε y f y 600 + f y

Maximum reinforcement ratio


ρ max = ρ max + ρ ' (50)
f ck εu
ρ max = 0.85β1
f y ε u + 0.004

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress
Eq. (48) is valid only if the compression steel yields at
beam failure.
In many cases, however, compression steel is below the
yyield stress.
Whether the compression steel will yield or not can be
determined as follows.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress

let, εs’ = εy, then from geometry


c εu
= (51)
d εu − ε y
'

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress
check minimum tensile reinforcement ratio ρ̄cy
; to ensure yielding
y g of compression
p steel
f ck d ε u
'
ρcy = 0.85β1 + ρ' (52)
f y d εu − ε y
f ck c f εu
Compare with Eq. (26) ρb = 0.85β1
f yd
= 0.85β1 ck
f y εu + ε y

If ρ<ρ̄cy , neutral axis is sufficiently high that the


compression steel stress at failure is less than the yield
stress. (fs’ < fy)
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress
balanced reinforcement ratio
'
f
ρb = ρb + ρ ' s (53)
fy
Compare with Eq. (49)
⎛ d' ⎞
,where f = E ε = Es ⎜ ε u − ( ε u + ε y ) ⎟ ≤ f y
s
' '
s s (54)
⎝ d ⎠
maximum reinforcement ratio ⎛ d
f = E ⎜ ε − (ε
'
'
+ 0.004 )

⎟ ≤ fy
' s s u u
f ⎝ d ⎠
ρ max = ρ max + ρ ' s
(55)
fy
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress
Note Equations for compression steel stress fs’ apply only
for beams with exact strain values in the extreme
il steell off εy or εt=0.004
tensile 0 004

If tensile reinforcement ratio ρ≤ρ̄b and ρ ≤ ρ̄cy, then the


tensile steel yields at failure, but the compression steel
does not reach the yield.
Therefore,, new equations
q for compression
p steel stress
and flexural strength are needed.
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress
comp. steel stress
ε s' : ε u = c − d ' : c
c − d '
f s' = ε s' Es = ε u Es
c (56)
where c is still unknown
force equilibrium
T = Cc + Cs
c − d'
F As f y = 0.85 f ck β1cb + A ε Es
'
s u (57)
c
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Compression Steel below Yield Stress
solve the quadratic Eq. (57) for c

then
h apply
l a = β1c

nominal flexural strength


⎛ a⎞
M n = 0.85 f ck ab ⎜ d − ⎟ + As' f s' ( d − d ' ) (58)
⎝ 2⎠

Note must ensure that compression steel does not


buckle using lateral ties (KCI 5.5.1)
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Analysis Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beam.
1. Check the tensile reinforcement ratio ρ<ρ̄b (Eq.(53))
using Eq.(54)
2. Calculate ρ̄cy from Eq.(52) determining whether
compression steel yields or not.
3. Compare ρ̄cy with actual tensile reinforcement ratio ρ.
¡) ρ≥ρ
ρ≥ρ̄cy then fs’=f
’ fy F Mn=Eq.(48)
Eq (48)
¡¡) ρ<ρ̄cy then fs’<fy F Mn=Eq.(58)
c should be calculated previously
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Design Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beams
Note
• Direct solution is impossible because,
because
steel areas to be provided depends on the steel stress,
which aare NOT
O KNOWNO before
b o the section
o is
proportioned.
• Assume fs’=ffy but this must be Confirmed.
Confirmed

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Design Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beams
1. Calculate maximum moment can be resisted by ρ = ρmax
or ρ for
o o εt = 0 005 to
0.005 o ensure
u φ φ=0.85
0 85

Corresponding As=ρmaxbd
a
M n = As f y (d − )
2
As f y
with a=
0.85 f ckk b

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Design Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beams
2. Find the excess moment, if any, that must be resisted
and set M2=Mn.
In other words, if Mn (from step 1) < Mu/ φ, then
set M2=MMn
Mu
F M1 = − M2
φ
(cont.)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Design Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beams
2. Now, As from step1 is defined as As2.
Here, As2 is the part of the tension steel area that
Here
works with compression force in the concrete.

F As − As' = As 2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Design Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beams
3. Tentatively assume fs’=fy , then
M1
A =
'
s
f y (d − d ' )

4. Add an additional amount of tensile steel As1=As’.


Thus, As=As2 (step 2) + As1
5. Analyze the doubly reinforced beam to see if fs’=fy ;
that is,, check ρ
ρ>ρ̄
ρcy to ensure yyielding
g of the compression
p
steel at failure.
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Design Procedure of Doubly Reinforced Beams
6. If ρ<ρ̄cy, then fs’<fy and the compression steel must
be increased to provide the needed force as follows.
( As − As' ) f y
a=
0 85 f ck b
0.85 a
G c=
β1
c−d '
f = ε u Es
s
'

c
fy
A '
f =A
' '
fy A '
s , revised =A
'
s ,trial
s , revised s s ,trial
f s'
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Example 3.12 (Analysis)

b = 300 mm
d = 600 mm, d’= 65 mm
As = 4,765 mm2 (6-No.32 in two rows)
As’ = 1,013
1 013 mm2 (2-No.25)
(2 N 25)
fy = 400 MPa, fck = 35 MPa

Calculate the design moment capacity of the beam.


Example_Solution_2.pdf
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Example 3.13 (Design)
What steel area(s) must be provided?
service live load = 37 kN/m
/
calculated dead load = 16 kN/m
simple span length = 5.4
54m
b = 250, h = 500 mm
fy = 400 MPa,
MPa fck = 27 MPa

Example_Solution_2.pdf
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS

- Reinforced concrete floors, roofs, decks are almost


monolithic.
G cast in once
- Upper part of such structures resist longitudinal
compression.
p
- The resulting beam cross section can be considered as
T-shaped
T shaped one.
- We call ‘-’ as flange, while ‘l’ web.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Note
The upper part of T beam is stressed laterally due to
slab action.
Transverse compression at the bottom surface of slab
g
can increase longitudinal compressive
p strength
g byy
25%.
Transverse tension at the top surface of slab can
decrease longitudinal tensile strength.
Neither effect is considered in DESIGN
DESIGN.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Effective Flange width

(a) (b)

In (b) of the above figure,


figure the element of the flange
between the webs are less stressed than the element
directly over the web due to the effect of SHEAR
deformation of the flange.
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
The criteria for effective width (KCI 3.4.8)
; for the convenience of design assuming uniform stress at
maximum value
• For symmetrical T beams, the effective width b should
be selected to be the minimum value out of the follows.
1) 16hf + bw
2)) one-fourth
f h the
h span length
l h off the
h beam
b
3) distance between the center of adjacent slab

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
The criteria for effective width (KCI 3.4.8)

2. For L beams having a slab on one side only, the effective


width shall not be exceed.
exceed
1) 6hf + bw
2) one-twelfth the span length of the beam + bw
3)) one-half the clear distance to the next beam + bw

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
The criteria for effective width (KCI 3.4.8)
3. For isolated T beams in which the flange is used only
for the purpose of providing additional compression
area,
1)) hf ≥ bw//2
2) total flange width ≤ 4bw

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis
- Neutral axis of T beam can either in the flange or in the
web, that is, c ≤ hf or c ≥ hf
- c ≤ hf, then T beam can be analyzed as a rectangular
beam.
c > hf, then the actual T-shaped compression zone
should be considered.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis

• In T beam analysis, equivalent stress block


(Whitney’s block) is still valid throughout the
extensive researches.

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis

As f y ρ f yd
a= =
0 85 f ck b
0.85 0.85
0 85 f ck

- a ≤ hf, then T beam can be treated as

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis (a > hf)
- For the convenience, As can be
divided into TWO parts.
p

(1) for Asf steel amount corresponding to


overhanging portion
0.85 f ck (b − bw )h f
Asf =
fy
⎛ hf ⎞
M n1 = Asf f y ⎜ d − ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis (a > hf)
(2) for remaining As-Asf
( As − Asf ) f y
a=
0.85 f ck bw
⎛ a⎞
M n2 = ( As − Asf ) f y ⎜ d − ⎟
⎝ 2⎠
total nominal moment
M n = M n1 + M n 2

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis (a > hf)
It should be noted that ρw and ρf are defined for
rectangular
g cross section bwd.
ρ w = As / bw d ρ f = Asf / bw d

Maximum reinforcement ratio


ρ w,max = ρ max + ρ f

where ρmax is as p
previouslyy defined for a rectangular
g
cross section.
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Strength Analysis (a > hf)

Minimum reinforcement ratio


As for rectangular beam, Eq.(41) can be applied

0 25 f ck
0.25 1.4
1 4
As ,min = bw d ≥ bw d (41)
fy fy

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Design Procedure of T beams
(1) Determine flange thickness hf based on flexural
requirements of the slab
(2) Determine the effective flange width b according to KCI.
(3) Choose web dimensions bw and d based on either of the
following:
(a) negative bending requirements at the support, if a continuous
T beam
(b) shear requirement (chapter 4)

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
T BEAMS
Design Procedure of T beams
(4) Calculate a trial value of As, assuming that a does not
exceed hf , with beam width equal to flange width b.
using ordinary rectangular beam design method.
(5) For the trial As, check a ≤ hf . If a > hf , revise As using
T beam equation.
(6) Check εt ≥ 0.004
((7)) Check ρw ≥ ρw,min
w min

Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008


3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Example 3.14 (Analysis)
An Isolated T beam
b = 700 mm,
mm hf = 150 mm
bw = 250 mm, h = 750 mm
As = 4,765
4 765 mm2 (6-No.32
(6-No 32 in two rows)
; The centroid of the bar group is 660 mm from the top of the beam
fy = 400 MPa,
MPa fckk = 21 MPa
Calculate the design moment capacity of the beam.
Example_Solution_2.pdf
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008
3. Flexural Analysis/Design of Beam
REC. BEAMS with TEN. & COMP. REBARS
Example 3.15 (Design)
A floor system consists of a 80mm concrete slab supported
by continuous T beams with a span 7.3 m span, 1.2 m on
centers.
Web dimensions, as determined by negative moment
requirements at the supports, are bw = 280 mm and d =
500 mm.
What tensile steel area must be provided at midspan to
resist a factored moment of 723 kN-m?
fy = 400 MPa, fck = 21 MPa Example_Solution_2.pdf
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab I. Spring 2008

You might also like