Cap Goods Comparison Spark - Dec 19
Cap Goods Comparison Spark - Dec 19
Cap Goods Comparison Spark - Dec 19
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Analyst Certification and Required Disclosures begin on last two pages – Click
Page 1
here
CAPITAL GOODS - COMPARATIVE STUDY
We have undertaken a comparative study of five large capital goods companies across key parameters including growth prospects
(macro/micro driven), end-market diversity, competitive intensity in the industry in which they are present, export potential and INDUSTRY UPDATE
import/indigenization efforts. The following are the key takeaways from an overall industry and individual stock perspective. December 27, 2019
Core industrial demand stays muted - Core industrial demand environment continues to stay sluggish with industrial capacity utilization, as per Market data
RBI data continuing to remain low at ~70%. Similarly, other parameters including industrial investment intention, coal based thermal power
capacity addition and captive power market remains largely stagnant. While we believe that these markets have largely bottomed out in terms of BSE SENSEX 41,682
demand, a full-fledged recovery is some time away (atleast 1-2 years).
Certain segments like automation/energy efficiency motors continues to grow irrespective of end-market weakness – Certain segments like NIFTY 12,266
automation have displayed healthy growth over the past few years even during a weak capex cycle. This had been driven by increased adoption of
automation by end-user clients to improve productivity/efficiency and de-bottlenecking the existing facility before going for fresh capex. Similarly, Performance (%)
increasing demand for energy efficient motors (of rating IE2 and above) is leading to structural growth for these products inspite of end market
capex being subdued. We would prefer players like ABB and SIEM who offers these product range over those who are solely dependent on the 1M 3M 12M
capex cycle recovery for order inflow improvement.
Sensex 3% 10% 15%
ABB, SIEM score high in terms of end market diversity – ABB, SIEM score high over other players in terms of end market diversity, granularity of
orders (KKC also scores high), and end-sector outlook. Whereas, BHEL and TMX score lower in the ranking in this parameter. CG Index -4% -5% -9%
Prefer players operating in MNC space, KKC score low here – While competitive intensity is high across all industries in the capital goods space
given the lack of demand recovery over the past few years, we prefer companies like ABB and SIEM which operates in segments/sub-segments ABB -2% 1% 8%
where they are a higher presence of MNC competitors. This is because of the relatively better pricing discipline that persists in segments where
BHEL -20% -10% -36%
there is a higher share of MNC players than industries dominated by Indian companies.
Potential for increased exports exists for ABB and SIEM, similar to Honeywell - Honeywell Automation (HWN) has increased the share of its KKC -2% -7% -33%
exports revenue from 32% in FY14 to ~45% in FY19, while that of ABB and SIEM is lower at 13% and 18% respectively. While we do not expect the
share of exports to go upto HWN’s level in the near term given the diverse segments in which these two players are present, increased sourcing SIEM -1% 15% 53%
by the parent especially in automation segment can lead to better exports growth/revenue mix.
TMX 2% -4% -6%
Indigenization initiatives to lower import dependence – ABB and SIEM have a higher share of imports (>55% and >40% as a % of raw material
respectively) vs. other players, with a large portion of it driven by high imports for the automation segment. Increased indigenization efforts in the
long term can lead to better pricing, improved margins and lower forex fluctuation risk. Imports for KKC, BHEL and TMX is relatively lower.
RESEARCH ANALYSTS
Views and top picks - Given the current backdrop of continued weakness in the capex cycle, we prefer companies which can grow inspite of an
absence of a capex momentum, with a wide end-market diversity and who are favorably placed in a better pricing environment which points RAVI SWAMINATHAN
towards ABB and SIEM as our top picks over the other players (TMX, BHEL and KKC). [email protected]
+91 44 4344 0058
BHEL Downgrade – Based on our interaction with players in the coal based thermal power equipment value chain including players like L&T-
MHI, JSW-Toshiba, etc, we believe that the demand scenario in the BTG/EPC market is unlikely to materially improve in the next 1-2 years and UTTHAM KUMAR R
overall ordering is likely to remain at ~3-4GW per annum. Given the muted ordering environment and continued stretched working capital [email protected]
cycle we downgrade BHEL from a “Buy” to “Reduce” rating assigning 6x multiple on Sept-21 earnings to arrive at TP of Rs.42. +91 44 4344 0023
find SPARK RESEARCH on Bloomberg [RESP SPAK <go>] | FACTSET | REFINITIV EIKON Page 2
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Capacity utilization levels across manufacturing sector remains low at ~70% Industrial investment proposal too continues to stay muted
Indian Manufacturing Companies Capacity Utilisation Trend (%) Investment Proposal Trend Across Industries (Rs.bn)
79.0 77.9 18,000
77.7
78.0 16,000 15,239
77.0
14,000
77.0
12,000 10,403
76.0 75.2
74.5 10,000
8,342 8,073
75.0 73.9 8,000 7,612
73.5
74.0 73.1 6,000 4,237 4,474 3,702 4,011 3,758
72.4 72.5 72.3 4,000 2,722 3,374
73.0 2,477
72.0 71.3 2,000
-
71.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
70.0 (Till
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 1HFY20 Oct)
Source: RBI, OBICUS Survey, Spark Capital Research Source: SIA Statistics, Spark Capital Research
Thermal power capacity addition has witnessed declining trend due to subdued
Domestic captive power market has remained stagnant over the past few years
demand environment
Net Coal based Thermal Plant Addition Trend (In GW) Domestic Captive Power Market (0-30MW)
1800 1700
25.0
20.5 1600 1400
19.4
20.0 18.1 18.2 1400
15.1 1200
15.0 900
In MW 1000 800 750 740
9.7 800 700 700 650
615
10.0
7.0 600
5.0 400
5.0 3.5
2.5
200
0.0 0
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 1HFY20 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Source: CEA, Spark Capital Research Source: Industry, Spark Capital Research
Page 3
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Growth drivers – Certain industries like industrial automation has grown at a healthy pace even during a muted capex cycle
Industrial automation growth majorly driven by efficiency improvement initiatives Sectors such as packaging, food & beverages and pharmaceuticals are driving
by user sectors growth
Industry Drivers
Industrial Automation Revenue Trend
1,20,000 12.6% 14%
The need for manufacturers to deliver more products in less time, lowering
10.9% Packaging down the cost of packaging, helping decrease the labor cost and to
12%
1,00,000 minimize damages during material handling.
8.7% 10%
7.8% 7.6% 7.7%
80,000
5.9% 8% Major automation is happening in the supply chain and logistics part of the
60,000 6% business where scale of businesses is growing very fast. Also companies
64,783
96,476 4% Food & Beverage need to package products at a very high scale, carton it & distribute it and
40,000 80,917 85,702
69,815 75,104 manage the whole warehousing concept automatically which is leading to
59,874 65,077 2%
54,012 implementation of automation.
20,000
0%
- -0.5% -2%
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Ever evolving regulations and new standards of quality compliance are
Pharmaceuticals driving the industry to adopt the latest technologies in machine
Market Size (Rs.mn) YoY growth (%) - RHS manufacturing, packaging and various other related aspects.
Automation is sweeping across India's manufacturing space Siemens to equip Bajaj Energy plant in India with digitalization Flipkart is automating its supply chain with robotics,
Indian shop floors are going smart. Manufacturing, a typically labour- solutions machine learning
intensive process, is adopting technology to boost productivity and Siemens will provide a complete thermal twin for the LPGCL coal-fired As it seeks to bring the next 200 million consumers online,
save costs. It is automating core processes to improve quality and stay power plant, enabling improvements in the plant’s performance. Walmart-owned Flipkart, which competes with US rival Amazon,
competitive. This is Industry 4.0 at its most granular. Siemens experts, in close collaboration with plant operations team, will is betting big on robots as part of its technology-led initiatives.
An example, the new Thermax plant at Dahej in Gujarat. At the ion provide remote performance monitoring and diagnostics from the The company already sells products across over 80 categories,
exchange resins unit, the company has removed workers from its recently launched Siemens MindSphere Application Center in Gurgaon. servicing all 20,000 pin codes in the country.
chemical mixing process. Instead, it has created an algorithm for each R. S. Sharma, Managing Director, Bajaj Power Ventures, said, “We are “If you have to scale business, the amount of space needed for
‘recipe’. delighted to partner with Siemens in our digitalization journey. The sorting millions of packages, is humongous. Doing that manually
Thermax plans to upgrade 13 other plants, some of which are nearly digital solutions are aimed at improving power plant performance and is also prone to error. The idea behind using cobots is to work at
four decades old. Its new facility in Sri City, Andhra Pradesh, is already optimizing operations. The solutions, once executed, will result in scale and provide faster service to the customers,” said Pranav
highly automated and the company has cut the production cycle to 15 sustainable and efficient power generation.” Saxena, head of robotics at Flipkart.
days from 40 earlier. Source: News Article Source: News Article
Source: News Article
Page 4
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Growth drivers - Companies commentary across industries indicate automation initiatives undertaken to improve operating efficiency
Page 5
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Growth drivers - Industrial motor (major power consumer in industries) demand is on the rise led by transition towards energy efficiency products
Industrial sector accounts for majority of the power consumption in India; Motors
India’s ban on IE1 and below motors a positive trigger for organized players
consume most power in that
Source: CEA, Spark Capital Research Source: News Article, Spark Capital Research
Shift towards IE2 & IE3 products to happen; Cheap/low efficiency motor import Further scope for growth remains for companies like ABB & Siemens with ~35% of
can come down the market still using less energy efficient motors
Efficiency Class Comparison Industrial Motor Market Mix Industrial Electric Motors Mix Industrial Electric Motors Mix
(2016) (2019)
Efficiency
Source: ICAI, Spark Capital Research Source: News Article, Spark Capital Research
Page 6
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
End-market diversity - ABB, Siemens, and Cummins have diversified portfolio compared to Thermax & BHEL
ABB Revenue Split: CY18 SIEM Revenue Split: FY19 TMX Revenue Split: FY19 KKC Revenue Split: FY19 BHEL Revenue Split: FY19
Unallocated Others Chemicals
Portfolio of
5% 1% 7%
Companies Power
9% PGBU
Environment Exports 80%
Gas and 29%
Power 14% 30%
Industy
36%
Electrificati Digital 20%
Robotics on Products Industries
and Motion 37% 19%
36%
Mobility
8%
IBU
Energy 17%
DBU
Industrial Smart Infrastructure 79%
24%
Automation 27%
22%
▪ Wide product portfolio, smaller ticket size of orders and better end market outlook
ABB (automation and motors) are key positives
▪ Wide product portfolio, smaller ticket size of orders and better end market outlook
SIEM (automation and motors) are key positives
▪ Concentration of orders driven by power sector, dependence of large orders and muted near
BHEL term outlook are concerns
▪ While revenue diversity and order granularity are healthy, end market demand (real estate)
KKC continues to be a major drag
▪ Dependence on large orders and core sector industrial demand revival are a near/medium
TMX term concern.
Page 7
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Competition - While competition is fierce across sub-sectors, we prefer companies in MNC space due to its reach and better pricing
Gas and Power ABB, GE T&D, Chinese players and Triveni Turbine
L&T, Schneider Electric, ABB, Emerson, Bosch, United
Smart Infrastructure
Technologies ▪ While SIEM participates in a competitive market, given the
high MNC players dominance, we believe pricing power is
SIEM Mobility Alstom, Bombardier, Toshiba, Medha Servo, ABB High
better.
Export Potential - Similar to Honeywell, ABB & Siemens too has significant scope for increasing its exports mix
HWN Exports Mix (%) ABB Exports Mix (%) SIEM Exports Mix (%)
▪ HWN’s increased sourcing from the parent
50.0% 15.0% 20.0% driven by lucrative overseas demand had led
18.7%
46.0% to significant increase in HWN India exports
45.0% 13.4% over the past few years.
17.5%
12.6% 16.0%
40.0% 12.5% ▪ ABB’s & SIEM’s exports mix currently is
~12.5% and 18.7% respectively, there is
15.0% enough scope for increasing its exports share
35.0%
32.1% which will positively impact both growth and
margin.
30.0% 10.0% 12.5%
FY14 FY19 FY14 FY19 FY14 FY19
Page 9
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Imports and Service income - Imports for ABB and Siemens are high; Indigenization efforts underway which should lead to better margin prospects
in the long run
RM Imports and Service Revenue Trend Commentary
Page 10
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Corporate Governance - ABB, BHEL, TMX come out largely clean; SIEM and KKC score lower
Management Alignment of interest Related party transaction No. of unlisted entities
Page 11
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
B/S (Rs.mn) CY17 CY18 CY19E CY20E CY21E CY17 CY18 CY19E CY20E CY21E 3) Higher indigenization efforts taken, especially in
key segments like industrial automation (where
Equity 36,069 40,073 36,364 46,669 51,992 - 6,795 9,611 12,848 16,330 more than 90% of the RM are imported) can
Debt 6,041 20 - - - - - - - - lead to significant margin expansion.
Total Networth 42,110 40,094 36,364 46,669 51,992 - 6,795 9,611 12,848 16,330
Creditors 27,131 18,745 20,325 21,542 24,410 - 11,806 11,887 12,458 13,082 Negative Triggers:
Others 19,639 31,930 10,363 10,503 10,649 - 9,422 9,294 9,759 10,247 1) Continued slowdown in key industrial sectors
Total Liabilities 88,881 90,769 67,052 78,714 87,051 - 28,022 30,792 35,065 39,659 like automobiles and infrastructure spending
can lead to subdued revenue growth.
Net fixed assets 2) Sharp rupee depreciation can impact margins
(incl. CWIP & Intg. 13,351 9,762 9,781 9,753 9,678 - 4,357 4,818 5,180 5,515 given higher share of imports.
assets)
Investments 2,706 2 2 2 2 - - - - -
Inventories 11,536 9,279 10,163 10,771 12,205 - 4,194 4,194 4,403 4,623
Debtors 27,878 16,869 19,309 20,465 23,190 - 14,000 14,000 14,700 15,435
Cash & bank
14,917 14,751 13,756 23,050 26,640 - -65 2,244 4,969 7,982
balance
Others 18,493 40,107 14,042 14,673 15,336 - 5,537 5,537 5,814 6,104
Total Assets 88,881 90,769 67,052 78,714 87,051 - 28,022 30,792 35,065 39,659
Page 12
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
EPS (Rs.) 25.1 30.5 37.1 41.7 48.3 3) Higher share of services and exports in the Gas and Power
segment can contribute to overall growth and margins
B/S (Rs.mn) FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
4) Higher indigenization efforts taken, especially in key
Equity 83,054 90,436 1,00,638 1,12,465 1,26,636 segments like digital industries can lead to significant
margin expansion
Debt - - - - -
Total Networth 83,054 90,436 1,00,638 1,12,465 1,26,636 5) Cost rationalization efforts taken in “portfolio of
companies” segment, where currently margins are low,
Creditors 41,609 44,617 49,079 53,987 59,385 can lead to better overall margin/profitability
Others 17,829 17,051 18,756 20,632 22,695
Total Liabilities 1,42,492 1,52,104 1,68,473 1,87,083 2,08,716 Negative Triggers:
Page 13
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Page 14
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
EBIT 4,349 5,153 5,686 5,986 6,614 2) Traction in the international markets, both through direct
orders from Middle East and Africa and from the newly
PAT 2,563 4,160 4,187 4,479 4,949 constructed Indonesia facility can add to overall order
PAT margin % 5.7% 7.0% 6.5% 7.4% 8.4% inflow
EPS (Rs.) 20.6 36.9 37.1 39.7 43.9 3) Better pricing in the ongoing/futuristic FGD orders can lead
to potential lucrative order wins for TMX when/if it
B/S (Rs.mn) FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E participates
Equity 27,147 30,143 33,414 36,147 39,740 4) Being a duopolistic market, improved domestic ordering
can lead to better pricing power and cash flows.
Debt 2,337 2,403 0 0 0
Total Networth 29,485 32,546 33,414 36,147 39,740
Negative Triggers:
Creditors 10,605 13,994 15,186 14,110 13,875
Others 19,361 21,460 22,778 24,260 25,922 1) Lack of traction from core industrial sectors (steel,
aluminium, etc) continues to remain a concern
Total Liabilities 59,450 67,999 71,378 74,517 79,537
2) Aggressive participation of Chinese players in certain
segments like Waste Heat Recovery is impacting pricing.
Net fixed assets
(incl. CWIP & Intg. 10,761 13,520 13,552 13,299 13,010
assets)
Investments 14,717 8,293 8,293 8,293 8,293
Inventories 3,666 5,086 5,519 5,128 5,043
Debtors 13,409 14,917 16,187 15,041 14,790
Cash & bank
2,940 3,691 4,333 8,213 12,755
balance
Others 13,958 22,493 23,493 24,544 25,646
Total Assets 59,450 67,999 71,378 74,517 79,537
Page 15
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
EBIT 8,671 10,466 9,119 9,715 10,506 2) Potential pre-buying ahead of CPCB IV implementation in
June-July 2021 can lead to strong growth in the power
PAT 7,085 7,226 6,638 7,203 7,861 generation segment.
PAT margin % 13.9% 12.8% 11.7% 11.9% 12.0% 3) Given the government’s focus on spend on infrastructure, a
EPS (Rs.) 23.5 26.1 23.9 26.0 28.4 recovery in demand created over a low base in FY20 can
surprise from a growth perspective in FY21 and beyond
B/S (Rs.mn) FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
4) Exports have declined by ~20% over the past 5 years and
Equity 39,861 41,305 42,949 44,159 46,028 can potentially surprise positively even if there is a
moderate recovery in end demand. Exports also carry
Debt 2,515 3,092 1,500 0 0
higher margin vs. domestic revenue and therefore can
Total Networth 42,376 44,396 44,449 44,159 46,028 contribute to margin expansion.
Creditors 7,580 8,251 8,541 9,145 9,911
Others 5,356 5,889 6,379 6,918 7,511 Negative Triggers:
Total Liabilities 55,312 58,536 59,369 60,222 63,450 1) Intense competition in the power generation space can
further impact pricing and therefore margins
2) Falling share of high-margin service income (due to
Net fixed assets (incl. CWIP improved power situation) can impact overall margins.
13,261 14,433 16,169 16,330 16,417
& Intg. assets)
Page 16
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Valuations
Page 17
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
CY12 CY13 CY14 CY15 CY16 CY17* CY18* CY19E* CY20E* CY21E*
Growth ratios
Revenue 1.6% 2.1% 0.1% 5.3% 6.2% -29.5% 9.8% 10.9% 6.0% 13.3%
EBITDA -7.0% 39.7% 18.3% 28.3% -2.5% -40.3% 10.4% 33.1% 20.1% 15.4%
Adj PAT -25.5% 30.5% 27.4% 31.3% 24.8% -39.8% 12.7% 61.4% 176.0% -44.0%
Margin ratios
Gross 28.3% 30.1% 32.2% 34.9% 35.0% 32.7% 32.5% 33.0% 33.5% 33.5%
EBITDA 4.4% 6.1% 7.2% 8.8% 8.0% 6.8% 6.8% 8.2% 9.3% 9.5%
Adj PAT 1.8% 2.3% 3.0% 3.7% 4.3% 3.7% 3.8% 5.5% 6.8% 7.1%
Performance ratios
Pre-tax OCF/EBITDA 14.1% 114.7% 88.8% 72.8% 155.5% 254.7% 185.7% 153.2% 98.1% 91.1%
OCF/IC (%) -1.8% 11.4% 15.3% 14.2% 34.5% 36.1% 30.3% 45.1% 29.1% 27.6%
RoE (%) 5.4% 6.8% 8.3% 10.3% 11.9% 6.5% 6.7% 10.7% 12.9% 12.9%
RoCE(%) 6.1% 7.8% 9.2% 10.6% 11.9% 6.7% 7.2% 11.6% 13.6% 13.3%
RoCE (Pre-tax) 9.2% 12.1% 14.3% 16.8% 18.2% 10.0% 11.2% 15.5% 18.2% 17.8%
RoIC (Pre-tax) 9.9% 13.0% 15.1% 18.8% 20.0% 13.3% 17.1% 26.5% 34.1% 37.2%
Fixed asset turnover (x) 5.4 4.8 4.1 4.0 4.1 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.7 4.0
Total asset turnover (x) 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.5
Financial stability ratios
Net Debt to Equity (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 (0.2) (0.2) (0.4) (0.4) (0.5) (0.5)
Net Debt to EBITDA (x) 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.0 (0.8) (2.1) (3.2) (2.3) (3.1) (3.2)
Interest cover (x) (1.2) 3.3 4.3 4.6 9.4 14.0 11.6 32.4 36.7 57.1
Cash conversion days 110 101 98 100 74 74 40 45 45 45
Working capital days 70 71 71 73 52 60 79 57 59 59
Valuation metrics
Fully Diluted Shares (mn) 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212
Market cap (Rs.mn) 3,09,798
P/E (x) 225.5 172.8 104.8 79.8 63.9 106.2 94.2 58.4 44.6 37.8
P/OCF(x) (616.9) 93.9 68.9 74.1 35.9 38.7 49.5 38.3 56.2 54.3
EV (Rs.mn)(ex-CWIP) 2,41,907 2,42,432 2,40,848 2,39,661 2,33,506 2,27,818 2,21,963 2,22,937 2,13,644 2,10,054
EV/ EBITDA (x) 71.9 51.6 43.3 33.6 33.6 55.0 48.5 36.6 29.2 24.9
EV/ OCF(x) (481.7) 73.4 53.5 57.3 27.1 28.5 35.5 27.6 38.8 36.8
FCF Yield -0.7% 0.3% 0.7% 1.1% 2.3% 2.0% 1.2% 2.3% 1.5% 1.5%
Price to BV (x) 11.9 11.6 11.0 10.3 9.4 8.6 7.7 8.5 6.6 6.0
Dividend pay-out (%) 46.3% 35.5% 34.3% 26.1% 20.9% 37.6% 33.3% 20.7% 15.8% 13.4%
Dividend yield (%) 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%
Page 20
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
Growth ratios
Revenue 0.9% -19.2% -22.8% -15.6% 11.6% 1.7% 4.9% -0.6% 9.7% 8.4%
EBITDA -5.2% -51.9% -53.6% -165.1% -177.7% 82.0% 10.9% -2.9% 41.0% 30.3%
Adj PAT -6.0% -47.7% -59.0% -150.0% -169.9% 62.7% 50.7% 13.9% 43.5% 29.8%
Margin ratios
Gross 42.1% 40.8% 42.3% 34.9% 39.9% 44.2% 41.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5%
EBITDA 19.4% 11.6% 7.0% -5.4% 3.7% 6.7% 7.1% 6.9% 8.9% 10.6%
Adj PAT 13.7% 8.8% 4.7% -2.8% 1.7% 2.8% 4.0% 4.6% 6.0% 7.2%
Performance ratios
Pre-tax OCF/EBITDA 54.3% 147.1% 86.0% -47.7% 108.4% 49.0% -161.6% 141.8% 73.0% 194.6%
OCF/IC (%) 8.7% 21.3% 3.6% 1.9% 3.1% 5.6% -17.1% 10.8% 6.0% 29.8%
RoE (%) 23.7% 10.9% 4.3% -2.1% 1.5% 2.5% 3.8% 4.4% 6.1% 7.6%
RoCE (%) 24.7% 11.1% 4.5% -1.6% 2.7% 3.3% 4.7% 5.3% 7.2% 8.8%
RoCE (Pre-tax) 35.2% 16.1% 6.8% -2.7% 3.4% 6.4% 7.9% 7.0% 9.6% 11.7%
RoIC (Pre-tax) 45.1% 16.6% 4.8% -11.6% 1.2% 6.4% 8.3% 7.1% 10.3% 14.1%
Fixed asset turnover (x) 4.7 3.4 2.4 2.0 3.0 5.3 5.2 4.8 4.9 4.9
Total asset turnover (x) 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
Financial stability ratios
Net Debt to Equity (x) (0.2) (0.3) (0.3) (0.3) (0.3) (0.3) (0.2) (0.2) (0.1) (0.3)
Net Debt to EBITDA (x) (0.7) (2.0) (4.6) 7.3 (9.8) (5.8) (2.3) (2.6) (1.6) (2.4)
Interest cover (x) 14.9 34.1 8.5 1.0 1.6 3.9 (13.5) 8.6 5.1 22.9
Cash conversion days 307 370 455 483 384 420 446 450 430 370
Working capital days 124 150 206 193 175 175 229 232 231 187
Valuation metrics
Fully Diluted Shares (mn) 3,671 3,671 3,671 3,671 3,671 3,671 3,482 3,293 3,293 3,293
Market cap (Rs.mn) 1,53,210
P/E (x) 2.4 4.7 11.3 (22.8) 32.6 20.0 12.6 10.5 7.3 5.6
P/OCF(x) 8.2 3.4 19.8 44.2 27.3 15.5 (3.9) 6.2 10.4 2.3
EV (Rs.mn) (ex-CWIP) 90,042 61,029 55,693 53,613 49,188 42,023 1,03,704 99,679 1,05,497 60,999
EV/ EBITDA (x) 1.0 1.4 2.7 (3.9) 4.6 2.2 4.8 4.8 3.6 1.6
EV/ OCF(x) 4.8 1.4 7.2 15.5 8.8 4.2 (2.7) 4.0 7.2 0.9
FCF Yield 5.7% 25.1% 2.1% -1.3% 1.4% 4.6% -28.1% 12.9% 6.3% 39.6%
Price to BV (x) 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4
Dividend pay-out (%) 20.0% 20.0% 19.9% -20.7% 57.8% 82.8% 57.3% 47.6% 33.1% 25.5%
Dividend yield (%) 8.2% 4.3% 1.8% 0.9% 1.8% 4.1% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%
Page 21
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Page 22
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
Growth ratios
Revenue 11.5% -13.4% 10.8% 6.9% 7.8% 0.1% 11.3% 0.2% 7.1% 8.4%
EBITDA 19.7% -16.5% 5.5% 5.4% 3.4% -8.7% 18.0% -16.7% 8.0% 8.7%
Adj PAT 30.1% -14.6% 31.0% -4.0% -2.6% -11.2% 10.8% -8.1% 8.5% 9.1%
Margin ratios
Gross 37.1% 39.0% 38.2% 37.1% 35.5% 35.9% 36.1% 34.5% 34.5% 34.5%
EBITDA 18.2% 17.5% 16.7% 16.5% 15.8% 14.4% 15.3% 12.7% 12.8% 12.8%
Adj PAT 15.3% 15.1% 17.8% 16.0% 14.5% 12.8% 12.8% 11.7% 11.9% 12.0%
Performance ratios
Pre-tax OCF/EBITDA 95.1% 85.1% 93.4% 111.1% 116.3% 111.5% 90.5% 117.5% 117.4% 114.3%
OCF/IC (%) 38.6% 18.2% 22.0% 26.6% 27.2% 19.5% 16.1% 18.4% 20.1% 21.4%
RoE (%) 31.7% 24.2% 28.8% 23.7% 20.3% 16.9% 17.8% 15.8% 16.5% 17.4%
RoCE(%) 32.4% 24.0% 28.4% 23.7% 20.0% 16.4% 16.7% 15.0% 16.1% 17.1%
RoCE (Pre-tax) 44.6% 32.7% 33.9% 28.6% 24.7% 21.0% 23.8% 20.1% 21.5% 22.8%
RoIC (Pre-tax) 59.2% 38.4% 30.7% 28.4% 26.9% 21.3% 22.7% 17.2% 18.5% 20.5%
Fixed asset turnover (x) 4.4 3.1 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.4
Total asset turnover (x) 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3
Financial stability ratios
Net Debt to Equity (x) (0.1) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0.0 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Net Debt to EBITDA (x) (0.4) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) 0.2 (0.3) (0.5) (0.7) (0.8) (1.0)
Interest cover (x) 114.7 86.7 110.9 72.2 44.4 42.8 33.7 26.2 77.4 -
Cash conversion days 64 78 83 76 65 79 69 75 75 75
Working capital days 65 93 83 98 86 86 87 89 85 81
Valuation metrics
Fully Diluted Shares (mn) 277 277 277 277 277 277 277 277 277 277
Market cap (Rs.mn) 1,53,846
P/E (x) 21.9 25.6 19.6 20.4 20.9 23.6 21.3 23.2 21.4 19.6
P/OCF(x) 29.1 42.5 30.7 22.2 20.6 24.3 28.2 23.8 22.1 21.1
EV (Rs.mn)(ex-CWIP) 1,44,558 1,48,562 1,48,851 1,50,108 1,48,430 1,46,593 1,47,131 1,46,650 1,44,886 1,42,556
EV/ EBITDA (x) 17.3 21.3 20.3 19.4 18.5 20.0 17.0 20.4 18.6 16.9
EV/ OCF(x) 27.3 41.0 29.7 21.7 19.9 23.1 26.9 22.7 20.8 19.5
FCF Yield 1.9% -0.7% 1.1% 1.3% 3.3% 2.9% 1.7% 2.3% 3.6% 3.8%
Price to BV (x) 6.4 6.0 5.3 4.4 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.3
Dividend pay-out (%) 51.3% 60.1% 49.4% 51.4% 52.8% 59.5% 65.2% 62.6% 69.3% 63.5%
Dividend yield (%) 2.3% 2.3% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 3.1% 2.7% 3.2% 3.2%
Page 23
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Page 24
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Page 25
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Page 26
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
Growth ratios
Revenue -9.8% -7.1% 4.0% -3.0% -12.9% -0.4% 33.8% 8.5% -7.1% -1.7%
EBITDA -17.2% -10.8% 5.5% -7.0% 0.9% -7.4% 14.1% 17.2% 5.0% 4.4%
Adj PAT -22.5% -27.7% -32.6% 90.7% -21.0% 4.1% 40.2% 28.4% 7.0% 10.5%
Margin ratios
Gross 39.6% 43.9% 46.0% 46.7% 49.5% 47.4% 44.1% 44.1% 44.1% 44.1%
EBITDA 8.9% 8.6% 8.7% 8.3% 9.7% 9.0% 7.7% 8.3% 9.3% 9.9%
Adj PAT 5.5% 4.3% 3.7% 5.5% 5.4% 5.2% 6.9% 6.4% 7.4% 8.3%
Performance ratios
Pre-tax OCF/EBITDA 62.7% 119.7% 97.7% 98.7% 113.7% 177.3% 15.6% 118.9% 138.5% 139.9%
OCF/IC (%) 7.6% 18.5% 19.9% 21.1% 24.9% 45.4% -6.4% 27.6% 37.2% 41.1%
RoE (%) 16.3% 10.6% 9.0% 12.2% 9.7% 8.8% 14.5% 13.1% 12.8% 13.0%
RoCE (%) 14.0% 8.7% 7.3% 12.6% 11.8% 9.7% 13.9% 13.8% 13.7% 13.8%
RoCE (Pre-tax) 22.2% 15.5% 15.7% 18.2% 18.4% 16.0% 17.5% 18.4% 18.3% 18.5%
RoIC (Pre-tax) 41.1% 23.9% 19.8% 25.8% 27.6% 25.3% 24.5% 24.2% 26.1% 29.0%
Fixed asset turnover (x) 5.1 3.4 2.8 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.8
Total asset turnover (x) 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0
Financial stability ratios
Net Debt to Equity (x) 0.0 0.1 0.1 (0.1) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.1) (0.2) (0.3)
Net Debt to EBITDA (x) 0.2 0.7 0.4 (0.3) (0.2) (0.2) (0.3) (0.8) (1.5) (2.2)
Interest cover (x) 5.2 11.8 3.8 20.7 34.5 41.5 (8.1) 55.9 - -
Cash conversion days 68 85 79 86 81 53 37 37 37 37
Working capital days 18 15 9 18 26 1 30 29 26 22
Valuation metrics
Fully Diluted Shares (mn) 119 119 119 113 113 113 113 113 113 113
Market cap (Rs.mn) 1,17,667
P/E (x) 40.9 56.7 63.0 41.7 48.9 50.7 28.4 28.2 26.3 23.8
P/OCF(x) 135.7 36.6 37.9 46.6 35.2 22.1 (101.9) 23.3 18.5 17.7
EV (Rs.mn) (ex-CWIP) 1,14,119 1,13,515 1,11,490 1,07,140 1,08,101 1,04,236 1,08,086 1,05,041 1,01,161 96,619
EV/ EBITDA (x) 23.3 26.0 24.2 25.0 25.0 26.0 23.6 19.6 18.0 16.5
EV/ OCF(x) 131.6 35.3 35.9 42.4 32.3 19.5 (93.6) 20.8 15.9 14.6
FCF Yield -2.2% 0.4% 2.4% 1.0% 1.8% 2.8% -2.3% 3.4% 4.8% 5.0%
Price to BV (x) 5.9 5.4 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.5 3.3 3.0
Dividend pay-out (%) 27.4% 32.5% 42.2% 25.3% 29.7% 30.8% 17.2% 18.1% 32.4% 22.7%
Dividend yield (%) 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 1.2% 1.0%
Page 27
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Spark Disclaimer
Spark Disclaimer
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited (Spark Capital) and its affiliates are engaged in investment banking, investment advisory and institutional equities. Spark Capital is registered with SEBI as a Stock Broker, corporate
member on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange and Category I Merchant Banker. We hereby declare that our activities were neither suspended nor we have defaulted with any stock exchange authority
with whom we are registered in the last five years. We have not been debarred from doing business by any Stock Exchange/SEBI or any other authorities, nor has our certificate of registration been cancelled by SEBI at any point
of time.
Spark Capital has two wholly owned subsidiaries (1) Spark Family Office and Investment Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the services of providing investment advisory services and is registered with SEBI as
Investment Advisor and (2) Spark Alternative Asset Advisors India Private Limited engaged in the business of Category II Alternate Investment Fund. Spark Capital have two more subsidiaries (1) Spark Fund Managers Private
Limited which is engaged in the business of Portfolio Management Services and is registered with SEBI (2) Spark Fund Advisors LLP registered with SEBI as Category III Alternate Investment Fund which was originally an associate
entity and became subsidiary with effect from August 01, 2018. Spark Capital also has an associate company Spark Infra Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the business of providing infrastructure advisory
services.
Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of companies referred to in this document (including the merits
and risks involved), and should consult its own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. This document is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced, redistributed or
passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, copied, in whole or in part, for any purpose. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident
of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject Spark Capital and/or its affiliates to any
registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document
may come are required to inform themselves of and to observe such applicable restrictions. This material should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such
an offer or solicitation would be illegal.
Spark Capital makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Spark Capital , its affiliates, and the employees of
Spark Capital and its affiliates may, from time to time, effect or have effected an own account transaction in, or deal as principal or agent in or for the securities mentioned in this document. They may perform or seek to perform
investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company referred to in this report.
This report has been prepared on the basis of information, which is already available in publicly accessible media or developed through an independent analysis by Spark Capital. While we would endeavour to update the
information herein on a reasonable basis, Spark Capital and its affiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also, there may be regulatory, compliance or other reasons that prevent Spark Capital and its affiliates
from doing so. Neither Spark Capital nor its affiliates or their respective directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be responsible or liable in any manner, directly or indirectly, for views or opinions expressed in this
report or the contents or any errors or discrepancies herein or for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on the report or the inability to use or access our service in this report or for any loss or damages whether direct or
indirect, incidental, special or consequential including without limitation loss of revenue or profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of or reliance on this report.
Spark Capital and/or its affiliates and/or employees may have interests/positions, financial or otherwise in the securities mentioned in this report. To enhance transparency, Spark Capital has incorporated a disclosure of interest
statement in this document. This should however not be treated as endorsement of views expressed in this report:
Details of Financial Interest of Research Entity [Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited] and its Associates No
Details of Financial Interest of covering analyst/ and his relatives No
Disclosure of interest statement
Page 28
Capital Goods - Comparative Study
Spark Disclaimer
Analyst Certification of Independence
The views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the analyst’s personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and no part of the research analyst’s compensations was, is or will be, directly or
indirectly, related to the specific recommendation or views expressed in the report.
Additional Disclaimer for US Institutional Investors
This report was prepared, approved, published and distributed by Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd a company located outside of the United States (a “non-US Group Company”). This report is distributed in the U.S. by LXM
LLP USA, a U.S. registered broker dealer, on behalf of Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd only to major U.S. institutional investors (as defined in Rule 15a-6 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”))
pursuant to the exemption in Rule 15a-6 and any transaction effected by a U.S. customer in the securities described in this report must be effected through LXM LLP USA.
Neither the report nor any analyst who prepared or approved the report is subject to U.S. legal requirements or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) or other regulatory requirements pertaining to research
reports or research analysts. No non-US Group Company is registered as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act or is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. or any other U.S. self-regulatory organization.
Analyst Certification. Each of the analysts identified in this report certifies, with respect to the companies or securities that the individual analyses, that (1) the views expressed in this report reflect his or her personal views about
all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly dependent on the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. Please bear in mind that
(i) Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd is the employer of the research analyst(s) responsible for the content of this report and (ii) research analysts preparing this report are resident outside the United States and are not
associated persons of any US regulated broker-dealer and that therefore the analyst(s) is/are not subject to supervision by a US broker-dealer, and are not required to satisfy the regulatory licensing requirements of FINRA or
required to otherwise comply with US rules or regulations regarding, among other things, communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies. This material was produced by Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd solely for information purposes and for the use of the recipient. It is not to be reproduced under
any circumstances and is not to be copied or made available to any person other than the recipient. It is distributed in the United States of America by LXM LL P USA and elsewhere in the world by Spark Capital Advisors (India)
Pvt. Ltd or an authorized affiliate of Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd . This document does not constitute an offer of, or an invitation by or on behalf of Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd or its affiliates or any other
company to any person, to buy or sell any security. The information contained herein has been obtained from published information and other sources, which Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd or its Affiliates consider to be
reliable. None of Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd accepts any liability or responsibility whatsoever for the accuracy or completeness of any such information. All estimates, expressions of opinion and other subjective
judgments contained herein are made as of the date of this document. Emerging securities markets may be subject to risks significantly higher than more established markets. In particular, the political and economic
environment, company practices and market prices and volumes may be subject to significant variations. The ability to assess such risks may also be limited due to significantly lower information quantity and quality. By
accepting this document, you agree to be bound by all the foregoing provisions.
LXM LLP USA assumes responsibility for the research reports content in regards to research distributed in the U.S. LXM LLP USA or its affiliates has not managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for the subject
company in the past 12 months, has not received compensation for investment banking services from the subject company in the past 12 months, does not expect to receive and does not intend to seek compensation for
investment banking services from the subject company in the next 3 months. LXM LLP USA has never owned any class of equity securities of the subject company. There are not any other actual, material conflicts of interest of
LXM LLP USA at the time of the publication of this research report. As of the publication of this report LXM LLP USA, does not make a market in the subject securities.
BUY Stock expected to provide positive returns of >15% over a 1-year horizon REDUCE Stock expected to provide returns of <5% – -10% over a 1-year horizon
Absolute Rating
Interpretation
ADD Stock expected to provide positive returns of >5% – <15% over a 1-year horizon SELL Stock expected to fall >10% over a 1-year horizon
Page 29