Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 168 views

    MODULE 5 Evaluation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    karla saba
    This document provides an evaluation rubric for teachers' LDM implementation portfolios. It evaluates portfolios on criteria such as demonstration of progress, quality of reflection, demonstration of professional standards, language/presentation, organization, and timeliness. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess portfolios as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    MODULE 5 Evaluation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    karla saba
    168 views9 pages
    This document provides an evaluation rubric for teachers' LDM implementation portfolios. It evaluates portfolios on criteria such as demonstration of progress, quality of reflection, demonstration of professional standards, language/presentation, organization, and timeliness. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess portfolios as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory.

    Original Title

    MODULE-5-Evaluation-Rubric (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an evaluation rubric for teachers' LDM implementation portfolios. It evaluates portfolios on criteria such as demonstration of progress, quality of reflection, demonstration of professional standards, language/presentation, organization, and timeliness. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess portfolios as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    168 views9 pages

    MODULE 5 Evaluation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    karla saba
    This document provides an evaluation rubric for teachers' LDM implementation portfolios. It evaluates portfolios on criteria such as demonstration of progress, quality of reflection, demonstration of professional standards, language/presentation, organization, and timeliness. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess portfolios as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    LESSON 2:

    THE
    E VA L U AT I O N
    RUBRIC
    EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
    FOR TEACHERS
    VERY SATISFACTORY
    EXCELLENT (3)
    CRITERIA SATISFACTORY MARGINAL (2 UNSATISFACTORY (1)
    (5) (4)
    DEMONSTRATION The outputs
    OF PROGRESS OF
    The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs
    THE LDM clearly and adequately reflect to a big reflect to a do not
    IMPLEMENTATION adequately
    (30%) captured the extent the limited show the
    captured the
    progress of the progress of progress of extent the progress of
    implementation the the LDM progress of the LDM
    of the LDM, implementati implementatio the LDM implementat
    showing on of the n implementati ion
    innovations that
    LDM on
    contribute to
    its smooth
    implementation
    EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
    For Teachers
    VERY SATISFACTORY
    EXCELLENT (3)
    CRITERIA SATISFACTORY MARGINAL (2 UNSATISFACTORY (1)
    (5) (4)

    QUALITY OF Reflection Reflection Reflection Reflection Reflection


    describes the describes the describes the describes the describes
    REFLECTION experience in the experience in the experience and experience in the experience in the
    (25%) LDM
    LDM relates them to implementation implementation
    implementation,
    implementation, the professional of the LDM with of the LDM with
    shows in-depth
    analysis and shows some standards and limited attempt no attempt to
    synthesis, and analysis, and personal to relate it to the relate it to the
    excellently relates relates it to the development professional professional
    it to the professional goals standards and standards and
    professional standards and to personal personal
    standards and to professional and development development
    professional and personal goals goals
    personal
    development
    development goals
    EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM
    IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
    FOR TEACHERS
    VERY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY (1)
    CRITERIA EXCELLENT MARGINAL (2
    (5) SATISFACTORY (3)
    (4)

    DEMONSTRATION The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs do
    OF PROFESSIONAL clearly clearly clearly clearly not demonstrate
    STANDARDS (20%) demonstrate 5 demonstrate 4 demonstrate 3 demonstrate the any indicator in
    or more indicators of indicators of 2 indicators of the professional
    indicators of relevant strands relevant strands relevant strands standards
    relevant strands in professional in professional in professional
    in professional standards standards standards
    standards
    EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM
    IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
    FOR TEACHERS
    VERY SATISFACTORY
    EXCELLENT (3)
    CRITERIA SATISFACTORY MARGINAL (2 UNSATISFACTORY (1)
    (5) (4)

    LANGUAGE AND The ideas are The ideas are The ideas are The ideas are The ideas are
    OVERALL expressed in clear, expressed in clear expressed well but expressed using jumbled and
    PRESENTATION OF coherent, and language with with incoherence very basic words difficult to
    THE OUTPUT appropriately- very minimal in some areas and and structure with understand; errors
    (15%) worded language errors in structure few errors in incoherence in in structure and
    with no errors in and/or writing structure and/or many areas and writing
    structure and/or conventions writing several errors in conventions are
    writing conventions structure and/or found almost
    conventions writing everywhere in the
    conventions output
    EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM
    IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
    FOR TEACHERS
    VERY SATISFACTORY
    EXCELLENT (3)
    CRITERIA SATISFACTORY MARGINAL (2 UNSATISFACTORY (1)
    (5) (4)

    ORGANIZATION The portfolio The portfolio The portfolio The portfolio The portfolio
    OF PORTFOLIO is logically is logically is generally has 3-4 items does not
    (5%)
    organized, is organized well- not well follow a
    insightful, organized placed in the logical order
    and offers with 1-2 overall
    new items not organization
    perspective well placed in
    and insights the overall
    organization
    EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR THE LDM
    IMPLEMENTATION PORTFOLIO
    FOR TEACHERS
    VERY SATISFACTORY
    EXCELLENT (3)
    CRITERIA SATISFACTORY MARGINAL (2 UNSATISFACTORY (1)
    (5) (4)

    TIMELINESS The output/s The output/s The output/s The output/s The output/s
    (5%) is/are is/are is/are is/are is/are
    submitted submitted 1-2 submitted on submitted 1-3 submitted
    more than 3 days before the day of the days after the more than 3
    days ahead of the deadline deadline deadline days after the
    the deadline deadline

    You might also like