Quieting of Title
Quieting of Title
Quieting of Title
The remedy of quieting of title is governed by Article 476 and 477 of the Civil
Code, which state:
“Art. 476. Whenever there is a cloud on title to real property or any interest
therein, by reason of any instrument, record, claim, encumbrance or proceeding
which is apparently valid or effective but is in truth and in fact invalid, ineffective,
voidable, or unenforceable, and may be prejudicial to said title, an action may be
brought to remove such cloud or to quiet the title.
An action may also be brought to prevent a cloud from being cast upon title to
real property or any interest therein.
Art. 477. The plaintiff must have legal or equitable title to, or interest in the real
property which is the subject-matter of the action. He need not be in possession
of said property.”
An action to quiet title has two indispensable requisites, namely: “(1) the plaintiff
or complainant has a legal or an equitable title to or interest in the real property
subject of the action; and (2) the deed, claim, encumbrance or proceeding
claimed to be casting cloud on his title must be shown to be in fact invalid or
inoperative despite its prima facie appearance of validity or legal efficacy.”
(Spouses Caldito v. Obado, G.R. No. 181596, January 30, 2017)
The first requisite is based on Article 477 of the Civil Code which requires that the
plaintiff must have legal or equitable title to, or interest in the real property which
is the subject matter of the action. “Legal title denotes registered ownership,
while equitable title means beneficial ownership, meaning a title derived through
a valid contract or relation, and based on recognized equitable principles; the
right in the party, to whom it belongs, to have the legal title transferred to him.”
(Salvador v. Patricia, Inc., G.R. No. 195834, November 9, 2016)
The concept of a cause of action in ordinary civil actions does not apply to
quieting of title. In declaratory relief, the subject-matter is a deed, will, contract
or other written instrument, statute, executive order or regulation, or ordinance.
The issue is the validity or construction of these documents. The relief sought is
the declaration of the petitioner’s rights and duties thereunder. Being in the
nature of declaratory relief, this special civil action presupposes that there has yet
been no breach or violation of the instruments involved.
In an action for quieting of title, the subject matter is the title sought to have
quieted. “Title” is not limited to the certificate of registration under the Torrens
System (i.e., OCT or TCT). Pursuant to Article 477 of the Civil Code, the plaintiff
must have legal or equitable title to, or interest in, the real property subject of the
action for quieting of title. The plaintiff need not even be in possession of the
property. (Republic v. Mangotara, G.R. Nos. 170375, 170505, 173355-56, 173401,
17356-64, 178779 & 178894, July 7, 2010)
“An action to quiet title or remove the clouds over the title is a special civil action
governed by the second paragraph of Section 1, Rule 63 of the Rules of Court.
Specifically, an action for quieting of title is essentially a common law remedy
grounded on equity. The competent court is tasked to determine the respective
rights of the complainant and other claimants, not only to put things in their
proper place, to make the one who has no rights to said immovable respect and
not disturb the other, but also for the benefit of both, so that he who has the
right would see every cloud of doubt over the property dissipated, and he could
afterwards without fear introduce the improvements he may desire, to use, and
even to abuse the property as he deems best.” (Salvador v. Patricia, Inc., G.R. No.
195834, November 9, 2016)
The concept of a cause of action in ordinary civil actions does not apply to
declaratory relief as this special civil action presupposes that there has been no
breach or violation of the instruments involved. Consequently, unlike other
judgments, the judgment in an action for declaratory relief does not essentially
entail any executional process as the only relief to be properly granted therein is a
declaration of the rights and duties of the parties under the instrument, although
some exceptions have been recognized under certain situations. (Republic v.
Mangotara, G.R. Nos. 170375, 170505, 173355-56, 173401, 17356-64, 178779 &
178894, July 7, 2010)