Quieting of Title

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that an action to quiet title requires the plaintiff to have legal or equitable title to the property and show that the instrument casting doubt is invalid. It is a special proceeding governed by Rule 63 that seeks to remove doubts about the plaintiff's title.

The two requisites of an action to quiet title are 1) the plaintiff has title to or interest in the property and 2) the instrument casting doubt must be shown to be invalid.

The subject of an action for quieting of title is the title to the property that the plaintiff seeks to have quieted or confirmed.

What is the legal basis for an action of quieting of title?

The remedy of quieting of title is governed by Article 476 and 477 of the Civil
Code, which state:

“Art. 476. Whenever there is a cloud on title to real property or any interest
therein, by reason of any instrument, record, claim, encumbrance or proceeding
which is apparently valid or effective but is in truth and in fact invalid, ineffective,
voidable, or unenforceable, and may be prejudicial to said title, an action may be
brought to remove such cloud or to quiet the title.

An action may also be brought to prevent a cloud from being cast upon title to
real property or any interest therein.

Art. 477. The plaintiff must have legal or equitable title to, or interest in the real
property which is the subject-matter of the action. He need not be in possession
of said property.”

What are the requisites of an action to quiet title?

An action to quiet title has two indispensable requisites, namely: “(1) the plaintiff
or complainant has a legal or an equitable title to or interest in the real property
subject of the action; and (2) the deed, claim, encumbrance or proceeding
claimed to be casting cloud on his title must be shown to be in fact invalid or
inoperative despite its prima facie appearance of validity or legal efficacy.”
(Spouses Caldito v. Obado, G.R. No. 181596, January 30, 2017)

What is the the meaning of “title”?

The first requisite is based on Article 477 of the Civil Code which requires that the
plaintiff must have legal or equitable title to, or interest in the real property which
is the subject matter of the action. “Legal title denotes registered ownership,
while equitable title means beneficial ownership, meaning a title derived through
a valid contract or relation, and based on recognized equitable principles; the
right in the party, to whom it belongs, to have the legal title transferred to him.”
(Salvador v. Patricia, Inc., G.R. No. 195834, November 9, 2016)

What is the subject of an action for quieting of title?

The concept of a cause of action in ordinary civil actions does not apply to
quieting of title. In declaratory relief, the subject-matter is a deed, will, contract
or other written instrument, statute, executive order or regulation, or ordinance.
The issue is the validity or construction of these documents. The relief sought is
the declaration of the petitioner’s rights and duties thereunder. Being in the
nature of declaratory relief, this special civil action presupposes that there has yet
been no breach or violation of the instruments involved.

In an action for quieting of title, the subject matter is the title sought to have
quieted. “Title” is not limited to the certificate of registration under the Torrens
System (i.e., OCT or TCT). Pursuant to Article 477 of the Civil Code, the plaintiff
must have legal or equitable title to, or interest in, the real property subject of the
action for quieting of title. The plaintiff need not even be in possession of the
property. (Republic v. Mangotara, G.R. Nos. 170375, 170505, 173355-56, 173401,
17356-64, 178779 & 178894, July 7, 2010)

When is there a “cloud on a title”?

“A cloud on a title exists when: (a) there is an instrument (deed, or contract) or


record or claim or encumbrance or proceeding; (b) which is apparently valid or
effective; (c) but is, in truth and in fact, invalid, ineffective, voidable, or
unenforceable, or extinguished (or terminated) or barred by extinctive
prescription; and (d) and may be prejudicial to the title.” (Heirs of Tappa v. Heirs
of Bacud, G.R. No. 187633, April 4, 2016)

Who may file an action for quieting of title?


“Generally, the registered owner of a property is the proper party to bring an
action to quiet title. However, it has been held that this remedy may also be
availed of by a person other than the registered owner because, in [Article 476 of
the Civil Code], ‘title’ does not necessarily refer to the original or transfer
certificate of title. Thus, lack of an actual certificate of title to a property does not
necessarily bar an action to quiet title.” (Spouses Portic v. Cristobal, G.R. No.
156171, April 22, 2005)

What is the prescriptive period for an action to quiet title?

“There is no prescription when in an action for reconveyance, the claimant is in


actual possession of the property because this in effect is an action for quieting of
title:

‘[S]ince if a person claiming to be the owner thereof is in actual possession of the


property, as the defendants are in the instant case, the right to seek
reconveyance, which in effect seeks to quiet title to the property, does not
prescribe. The reason for this is that one who is in actual possession of a piece of
land claiming to be the owner thereof may wait until his possession is disturbed
or his title is attacked before taking steps to vindicate his right, the reason for the
rule being, that his undisturbed possession gives him a continuing right to seek
the aid of a court of equity to ascertain and determine the nature of the adverse
claim of a third party and its effect on his own title, which right can be claimed
only by one who is in possession.'” (Philippine National Bank v. Jumamoy, G.R.
No. 169901, August 3, 2011, 670 PHIL 472-484)

Under what rule is an action for quieting of title filed?

An action for quieting of title is a special proceeding, specifically governed by Rule


63 of the Rules of Court on declaratory relief and similar remedies. Actions for
declaratory relief and other similar remedies are distinguished from ordinary civil
actions because in declaratory relief, the subject-matter is a deed, will, contract or
other written instrument, statute, executive order or regulation, or ordinance.
The issue is the validity or construction of these documents. The relief sought is
the declaration of the petitioner’s rights and duties thereunder. (Republic v.
Mangotara, G.R. Nos. 170375, 170505, 173355-56, 173401, 17356-64, 178779 &
178894, July 7, 2010)

“An action to quiet title or remove the clouds over the title is a special civil action
governed by the second paragraph of Section 1, Rule 63 of the Rules of Court.
Specifically, an action for quieting of title is essentially a common law remedy
grounded on equity. The competent court is tasked to determine the respective
rights of the complainant and other claimants, not only to put things in their
proper place, to make the one who has no rights to said immovable respect and
not disturb the other, but also for the benefit of both, so that he who has the
right would see every cloud of doubt over the property dissipated, and he could
afterwards without fear introduce the improvements he may desire, to use, and
even to abuse the property as he deems best.” (Salvador v. Patricia, Inc., G.R. No.
195834, November 9, 2016)

How is an action to quiet title different from an action for reconveyance?

An action for reconveyance is based on Section 55 of Act No. 496, otherwise


known as the Land Registration Act, as amended, which states “[t]hat in all cases
of registration procured by fraud the owner may pursue all his legal and equitable
remedies against the parties to such fraud, without prejudice, however, to the
rights of any innocent holder for value of a certificate of title.” (Republic v.
Mangotara, G.R. Nos. 170375, 170505, 173355-56, 173401, 17356-64, 178779 &
178894, July 7, 2010)

The concept of a cause of action in ordinary civil actions does not apply to
declaratory relief as this special civil action presupposes that there has been no
breach or violation of the instruments involved. Consequently, unlike other
judgments, the judgment in an action for declaratory relief does not essentially
entail any executional process as the only relief to be properly granted therein is a
declaration of the rights and duties of the parties under the instrument, although
some exceptions have been recognized under certain situations. (Republic v.
Mangotara, G.R. Nos. 170375, 170505, 173355-56, 173401, 17356-64, 178779 &
178894, July 7, 2010)

You might also like