Enmienda IFRS 17 IFRS2020 PDF

June 2020
IFRS® Standards
Amendments to IFRS 17
Amendments to IFRS 17 is issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (Board).
Disclaimer: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board and the IFRS Foundation
(Foundation) expressly disclaim all liability howsoever arising from this publication or any
translation thereof whether in contract, tort or otherwise to any person in respect of any claims or
losses of any nature including direct, indirect, incidental or consequential loss, punitive damages,
penalties or costs.
Information contained in this publication does not constitute advice and should not be substituted
for the services of an appropriately qualified professional.
ISBN: 978-1-911629-77-1
Copyright © 2020 IFRS Foundation
All rights reserved. Reproduction and use rights are strictly limited. Please contact the Foundation
for further details at [email protected].
Copies of Board publications may be ordered from the Foundation by emailing [email protected]
or visiting our shop at https://shop.ifrs.org.
The Foundation has trade marks registered around the world (Marks) including ‘IAS®’, ‘IASB®’, the
IASB® logo, ‘IFRIC®’, ‘IFRS®’, the IFRS® logo, ‘IFRS for SMEs®’, the IFRS for SMEs® logo, ‘International
Accounting Standards®’, ‘International Financial Reporting Standards®’, the ‘Hexagon Device’, ‘NIIF®’
and ‘SIC®’. Further details of the Foundation’s Marks are available from the Foundation on request.
The Foundation is a not-for-profit corporation under the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, USA and operates in England and Wales as an overseas company (Company number:
FC023235) with its principal office in the Columbus Building, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf,
London, E14 4HD.
AMENDMENTS TO IFRS 17—JUNE 2020
CONTENTS
from page
AMENDMENTS TO IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS 4
AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX A─DEFINED TERMS 22
AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX B─APPLICATION GUIDANCE 25
AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX C─EFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITION 40
AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX D─AMENDMENTS TO OTHER IFRS
STANDARDS 47
APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF AMENDMENTS TO IFRS 17 ISSUED IN
JUNE 2020 55
AMENDMENTS TO ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES ON IFRS 17 56
AMENDMENTS TO BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS ON IFRS 17 78
© IFRS Foundation 3
IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
Paragraphs 4 and 7 are amended, and paragraph 8A is added. New text is underlined and
deleted text is struck through.
Scope
...
4 All references in IFRS 17 to insurance contracts also apply to:
(a) reinsurance contracts held, except:
(i) ...
(ii) as described in paragraphs 60–70A70.
(b) ...
...
7 An entity shall not apply IFRS 17 to:
...
(h) credit card contracts, or similar contracts that provide credit or

payment arrangements, that meet the definition of an insurance
contract if, and only if, the entity does not reflect an assessment of the
insurance risk associated with an individual customer in setting the
price of the contract with that customer (see IFRS 9 and other
applicable IFRS Standards). However, if, and only if, IFRS 9 requires an
entity to separate an insurance coverage component (see
paragraph 2.1(e)(iv) of IFRS 9) that is embedded in such a contract, the
entity shall apply IFRS 17 to that component.
...
8A Some contracts meet the definition of an insurance contract but limit the
compensation for insured events to the amount otherwise required to settle
the policyholder's obligation created by the contract (for example, loans with
death waivers). An entity shall choose to apply either IFRS 17 or IFRS 9 to such
contracts that it issues unless such contracts are excluded from the scope of
IFRS 17 by paragraph 7. The entity shall make that choice for each portfolio of
insurance contracts, and the choice for each portfolio is irrevocable.
Paragraphs 10‒12 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Separating components from an insurance contract

(paragraphs B31–B35)
10 An insurance contract may contain one or more components that would be
within the scope of another Standard if they were separate contracts. For
example, an insurance contract may include an investment component or a
service component for services other than insurance contract services (or both).
4 © IFRS Foundation
An entity shall apply paragraphs 11–13 to identify and account for the
components of the contract.
11 An entity shall:
(a) ...
(b) separate from a host insurance contract an investment component if,

and only if, that investment component is distinct (see paragraphs
B31–B32). The entity shall apply IFRS 9 to account for the separated
investment component unless it is an investment contract with
discretionary participation features within the scope of IFRS 17 (see
paragraph 3(c)).
12 After applying paragraph 11 to separate any cash flows related to embedded

derivatives and distinct investment components, an entity shall separate from
the host insurance contract any promise to transfer to a policyholder distinct
goods or non‑insurance services other than insurance contract servicesto a
policyholder, applying paragraph 7 of IFRS 15. The entity shall account for
such promises applying IFRS 15. In applying paragraph 7 of IFRS 15 to
separate the promise, the entity shall apply paragraphs B33–B35 of IFRS 17
and, on initial recognition, shall:
(a) apply IFRS 15 to attribute the cash inflows between the insurance
component and any promises to provide distinct goods or
non‑insurance services other than insurance contract services; and
(b) attribute the cash outflows between the insurance component and any
promised goods or non‑insurance services other than insurance
contract services, accounted for applying IFRS 15 so that:
...
...
Paragraphs 19 and 24 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Level of aggregation of insurance contracts

...
19 For contracts issued to which an entity does not apply the premium allocation
approach (see paragraphs 53–5459), an entity shall assess whether contracts
that are not onerous at initial recognition have no significant possibility of
becoming onerous:
...
24 An entity shall apply the recognition and measurement requirements of
IFRS 17 to the groups of contracts issued determined by applying paragraphs
14–23. An entity shall establish the groups at initial recognition and add
contracts to the groups applying paragraph 28., and The entity shall not
reassess the composition of the groups subsequently. To measure a group of
contracts, an entity may estimate the fulfilment cash flows at a higher level of
IFRS STANDARD
aggregation than the group or portfolio, provided the entity is able to include
the appropriate fulfilment cash flows in the measurement of the group,
applying paragraphs 32(a), 40(a)(i) and 40(b), by allocating such estimates to
groups of contracts.
Paragraph 27 is deleted and paragraph 28 is amended. Paragraphs 28A–28F and the

heading above paragraph 28A are added. Paragraph 25 is not amended, but is included
for ease of reference. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Recognition
25 An entity shall recognise a group of insurance contracts it issues from the
earliest of the following:
(a) the beginning of the coverage period of the group of contracts;
(b) the date when the first payment from a policyholder in the group
becomes due; and
(c) for a group of onerous contracts, when the group becomes onerous.
...
27 [Deleted]An entity shall recognise an asset or liability for any insurance

acquisition cash flows relating to a group of issued insurance contracts that the
entity pays or receives before the group is recognised, unless it chooses to
recognise them as expenses or income applying paragraph 59(a). An entity
shall derecognise the asset or liability resulting from such insurance
acquisition cash flows when the group of insurance contracts to which the
cash flows are allocated is recognised (see paragraph 38(b)).
28 In recognising a group of insurance contracts in a reporting period, an entity

shall include only contracts that individually meet one of the criteria set out
in paragraph 25issued by the end of the reporting period and shall make
estimates for the discount rates at the date of initial recognition (see
paragraph B73) and the coverage units provided in the reporting period (see
paragraph B119). An entity may includeissue more contracts in the group
after the end of a reporting period, subject to paragraphs 14–22paragraph 22.
An entity shall add a contractthe contracts to the group in the reporting
period in which that contract meets one of the criteria set out in
paragraph 25the contracts are issued. This may result in a change to the
determination of the discount rates at the date of initial recognition applying
paragraph B73. An entity shall apply the revised rates from the start of the
reporting period in which the new contracts are added to the group.
Insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraphs B35A‒

B35D)
28A An entity shall allocate insurance acquisition cash flows to groups of insurance
contracts using a systematic and rational method applying paragraphs B35A‒
B35B, unless it chooses to recognise them as expenses applying
paragraph 59(a).
28B An entity not applying paragraph 59(a) shall recognise as an asset insurance
acquisition cash flows paid (or insurance acquisition cash flows for which a
liability has been recognised applying another IFRS Standard) before the
related group of insurance contracts is recognised. An entity shall recognise
such an asset for each related group of insurance contracts.
28C An entity shall derecognise an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows when
the insurance acquisition cash flows are included in the measurement of the
related group of insurance contracts applying paragraph 38(c)(i) or
paragraph 55(a)(iii).
28D If paragraph 28 applies, an entity shall apply paragraphs 28B‒28C in

accordance with paragraph B35C.
28E At the end of each reporting period, an entity shall assess the recoverability of
an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows if facts and circumstances
indicate the asset may be impaired (see paragraph B35D). If entity identifies an
impairment loss, the entity shall adjust the carrying amount of the asset and
recognise the impairment loss in profit or loss.
28F An entity shall recognise in profit or loss a reversal of some or all of an

impairment loss previously recognised applying paragraph 28E and increase
the carrying amount of the asset, to the extent that the impairment
conditions no longer exist or have improved.
Paragraph 29 and the heading above it are amended. New text is underlined and deleted
text is struck through.
Measurement (paragraphs B36–B119FB119)

29 An entity shall apply paragraphs 30–52 to all groups of insurance contracts
within the scope of IFRS 17, with the following exceptions:
(a) ...
(b) for groups of reinsurance contracts held, an entity shall apply

paragraphs 32–46 as required by paragraphs 63–70A70.
ParagraphParagraphs 45 (on insurance contracts with direct participation
features) and paragraphs 47–52 (on onerous contracts) do not apply to
groups of reinsurance contracts held.
...
IFRS STANDARD
The heading for paragraph 32 is amended. Paragraphs 34 and 38–39 are amended. New
text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Measurement on initial recognition (paragraphs B36–

B95FB95)
...
Estimates of future cash flows (paragraphs B36–B71)

...
34 Cash flows are within the boundary of an insurance contract if they arise from
substantive rights and obligations that exist during the reporting period in
which the entity can compel the policyholder to pay the premiums or in
which the entity has a substantive obligation to provide the policyholder with
insurance contract services (see paragraphs B61–B71). A substantive obligation
to provide insurance contract services ends when:
(a) ...
(b) both of the following criteria are satisfied:
(i) ...
(ii) the pricing of the premiums for coverage up to the date when
the risks are reassessed does not take into account the risks
that relate to periods after the reassessment date.
...
Contractual service margin

38 The contractual service margin is a component of the asset or liability for
the group of insurance contracts that represents the unearned profit the
entity will recognise as it provides insurance contract services in the
future. An entity shall measure the contractual service margin on initial
recognition of a group of insurance contracts at an amount that, unless
paragraph 47 (on onerous contracts) or paragraph B123A (on insurance
revenue relating to paragraph 38(c)(ii)) applies, results in no income or
expenses arising from:
(a) ...
(b) any cash flows arising from the contracts in the group at that date;
(c)(b) the derecognition at the date of initial recognition of:
(i) any asset or liability recognised for insurance acquisition

cash flows applying paragraph 28C27; and
(ii) any other asset or liability previously recognised for cash

flows related to the group of contracts as specified in
paragraph B66A.
(c) any cash flows arising from the contracts in the group at that date.
39 For insurance contracts acquired in a transfer of insurance contracts or in a

business combination within the scope of IFRS 3, an entity shall apply
paragraph 38 in accordance with paragraphs B93–B95FB95.
Paragraphs 44–45 and the heading above them are amended. New text is underlined and
Contractual service margin (paragraphs B96–B119BB119)

...
44 For insurance contracts without direct participation features, the carrying amount of
the contractual service margin of a group of contracts at the end of the
reporting period equals the carrying amount at the start of the reporting
period adjusted for:
...
(e) the amount recognised as insurance revenue because of the transfer of

insurance contract services in the period, determined by the allocation
of the contractual service margin remaining at the end of the
reporting period (before any allocation) over the current and
remaining coverage period applying paragraph B119.
45 For insurance contracts with direct participation features (see paragraphs

B101–B118), the carrying amount of the contractual service margin of a group
of contracts at the end of the reporting period equals the carrying amount at
the start of the reporting period adjusted for the amounts specified in
subparagraphs (a)–(e) below. An entity is not required to identify these
adjustments separately. Instead, a combined amount may be determined for
some, or all, of the adjustments. The adjustments are:
(a) ...
(b) the change in the amount of the entity’s share of the change in the fair
value of the underlying items (see paragraph B104(b)(i)), except to the
extent that:
(i) ...
(ii) the decrease in the amount of the entity’s share of a decrease in

the fair value of the underlying items exceeds the carrying
amount of the contractual service margin, giving rise to a loss
(see paragraph 48); or
(iii) the increase in the amount of the entity’s share of an increase

in the fair value of the underlying items reverses the amount in
(ii).
...
IFRS STANDARD
(e) the amount recognised as insurance revenue because of the transfer of

insurance contract services in the period, determined by the allocation
of the contractual service margin remaining at the end of the
reporting period (before any allocation) over the current and
remaining coverage period, applying paragraph B119.
...
Paragraphs 47–48 and 50 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Onerous contracts
47 An insurance contract is onerous at the date of initial recognition if the
fulfilment cash flows allocated to the contract, any previously recognised
insurance acquisition cash flows and any cash flows arising from the contract
at the date of initial recognition in total are a net outflow. Applying
paragraph 16(a), an entity shall group such contracts separately from
contracts that are not onerous. To the extent that paragraph 17 applies, an
entity may identify the group of onerous contracts by measuring a set of
contracts rather than individual contracts. An entity shall recognise a loss in
profit or loss for the net outflow for the group of onerous contracts, resulting
in the carrying amount of the liability for the group being equal to the
fulfilment cash flows and the contractual service margin of the group being
zero.
48 A group of insurance contracts becomes onerous (or more onerous) on

subsequent measurement if the following amounts exceed the carrying
amount of the contractual service margin:
(a) unfavourable changes relating to future service in the fulfilment cash

flows allocated to the group, arising from changes in estimates of
future cash flows and the risk adjustment for non-financial
riskrelating to future service; and
(b) for a group of insurance contracts with direct participation features,

the decrease in the amount of the entity’s share of a decrease in the
fair value of the underlying items.
Applying paragraphs 44(c)(i), 45(b)(ii) and 45(c)(ii), an entity shall recognise a

loss in profit or loss to the extent of that excess.
...
50 After an entity has recognised a loss on an onerous group of insurance

contracts, it shall allocate:
(a) ...
(b) solely to the loss component until that component is reduced to zero:
(i) any subsequent decrease relating to future service in fulfilment

cash flows allocated to the group arising from changes in
estimates of future cash flows and the risk adjustment for non-
financial risk;relating to future service and
(ii) any subsequent increases in the amount of the entity’s share

ofin the fair value of the underlying items solely to the loss
component until that component is reduced to zero.
Applying paragraphs 44(c)(ii), 45(b)(iii) and 45(c)(iii), an entity shall

adjust the contractual service margin only for the excess of the
decrease over the amount allocated to the loss component.
...
Paragraphs 53 and 55–56 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Premium allocation approach

53 An entity may simplify the measurement of a group of insurance contracts
using the premium allocation approach set out in paragraphs 55–59 if, and
only if, at the inception of the group:
(a) ...
(b) the coverage period of each contract in the group (including insurance
contract servicescoverage arising from all premiums within the
contract boundary determined at that date applying paragraph 34) is
one year or less.
...
55 Using the premium allocation approach, an entity shall measure the liability
for remaining coverage as follows:
(a) on initial recognition, the carrying amount of the liability is:
...
(iii) plus or minus any amount arising from the derecognition at

that date of:
1. any asset for insurance acquisition cash flows applying

paragraph 28C; and the asset or liability recognised for
insurance acquisition cash flows applying paragraph 27.
2. any other asset or liability previously recognised for

cash flows related to the group of contracts as specified
in paragraph B66A.
IFRS STANDARD
(b) at the end of each subsequent reporting period, the carrying amount of
the liability is the carrying amount at the start of the reporting period:
...
(v) minus the amount recognised as insurance revenue for

servicescoverage provided in that period (see paragraph B126);
and
(vi) ...
56 If insurance contracts in the group have a significant financing component, an

entity shall adjust the carrying amount of the liability for remaining coverage
to reflect the time value of money and the effect of financial risk using the
discount rates specified in paragraph 36, as determined on initial recognition.
The entity is not required to adjust the carrying amount of the liability for
remaining coverage to reflect the time value of money and the effect of
financial risk if, at initial recognition, the entity expects that the time
between providing each part of the servicescoverage and the related premium
due date is no more than a year.
...
Paragraphs 60, 62, 65–66 and 69 are amended, paragraph 62 is bifurcated creating new
paragraph 62A, paragraph 65 is bifurcated creating new paragraph 65A, paragraphs
66A–66B and 70A are added. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Reinsurance contracts held

60 The requirements in IFRS 17 are modified for reinsurance contracts held, as
set out in paragraphs 61–70A70.
...
Recognition
62 Instead of applying paragraph 25, an entity shall recognise a group of
reinsurance contracts held from the earlier of the following:
(a) the beginning of the coverage period of the group of reinsurance

contracts held; and
(b) the date the entity recognises an onerous group of underlying

insurance contracts applying paragraph 25(c), if the entity entered into
the related reinsurance contract held in the group of reinsurance
contracts held at or before that date.
62A Notwithstanding paragraph 62(a), an entity shall delay the recognition of a

group of reinsurance contracts held that provide proportionate coverage until
the date that any underlying insurance contract is initially recognised, if that
date is later than the beginning of the coverage period of the group of
reinsurance contracts held.
62 Instead of applying paragraph 25, an entity shall recognise a group of

reinsurance contracts held:
(a) if the reinsurance contracts held provide proportionate coverage—at

the beginning of the coverage period of the group of reinsurance
contracts held or at the initial recognition of any underlying contract,
whichever is the later; and
(b) in all other cases—from the beginning of the coverage period of the
group of reinsurance contracts held.
Measurement
...
65 The requirements of paragraph 38 that relate to determining the contractual

service margin on initial recognition are modified to reflect the fact that for a
group of reinsurance contracts held there is no unearned profit but instead a
net cost or net gain on purchasing the reinsurance. Hence, unless
paragraph 65A applies, on initial recognition: (a) the entity shall recognise any
net cost or net gain on purchasing the group of reinsurance contracts held as
a contractual service margin measured at an amount equal to the sum of:
(a) the fulfilment cash flows;,
(b) the amount derecognised at that date of any asset or liability

previously recognised for cash flows related to the group of
reinsurance contracts held;, and
(c) any cash flows arising at that date; and
(d) any income recognised in profit or loss applying paragraph 66A.;

unless
65A If (b) the net cost of purchasing reinsurance coverage relates to events that
occurred before the purchase of the group of reinsurance contracts held, in
which case, notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph B5, the entity
shall recognise such a cost immediately in profit or loss as an expense.
66 Instead of applying paragraph 44, an entity shall measure the contractual

service margin at the end of the reporting period for a group of reinsurance
contracts held as the carrying amount determined at the start of the reporting
period, adjusted for:
...
(ba) income recognised in profit or loss in the reporting period applying

paragraph 66A;
(bb) reversals of a loss-recovery component recognised applying

paragraph 66B (see paragraph B119F) to the extent those reversals are
not changes in the fulfilment cash flows of the group of reinsurance
contracts held;
IFRS STANDARD
(c) changes in the fulfilment cash flows, measured at the discount rates
specified in paragraph B72(c), to the extent that the change relates to
future service, unless:
(i) relates to future service; unless
(i)(ii) the change results from a change in fulfilment cash flows

allocated to a group of underlying insurance contracts that
does not adjust the contractual service margin for the group of
underlying insurance contracts; or.
(ii) the change results from applying paragraphs 57‒58 (on onerous
contracts), if the entity measures a group of underlying
insurance contracts applying the premium allocation approach.
...
66A An entity shall adjust the contractual service margin of a group of reinsurance
contracts held, and as a result recognise income, when the entity recognises a
loss on initial recognition of an onerous group of underlying insurance
contracts or on addition of onerous underlying insurance contracts to a group
(see paragraphs B119C‒B119E).
66B An entity shall establish (or adjust) a loss-recovery component of the asset for
remaining coverage for a group of reinsurance contracts held depicting the
recovery of losses recognised applying paragraphs 66(c)(i)‒(ii) and 66A. The
loss-recovery component determines the amounts that are presented in profit
or loss as reversals of recoveries of losses from reinsurance contracts held and
are consequently excluded from the allocation of premiums paid to the
reinsurer (see paragraph B119F).
...
Premium allocation approach for reinsurance contracts held

69 An entity may use the premium allocation approach set out in paragraphs
55–56 and 59 (adapted to reflect the features of reinsurance contracts held
that differ from insurance contracts issued, for example the generation of
expenses or reduction in expenses rather than revenue) to simplify the
measurement of a group of reinsurance contracts held, if at the inception of
the group:
(a) ...
(b) the coverage period of each contract in the group of reinsurance

contracts held (including insurance coverage from all premiums
within the contract boundary determined at that date applying
paragraph 34) is one year or less.
...
70A If an entity measures a group of reinsurance contracts held applying the

premium allocation approach, the entity shall apply paragraph 66A by
adjusting the carrying amount of the asset for remaining coverage instead of
adjusting the contractual service margin.
Paragraph 71 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Investment contracts with discretionary participation

features
71 An investment contract with discretionary participation features does not
include a transfer of significant insurance risk. Consequently, the
requirements in IFRS 17 for insurance contracts are modified for investment
contracts with discretionary participation features as follows:
(a) the date of initial recognition (see paragraphs 25 and 28paragraph 25)
is the date the entity becomes party to the contract.
...
Paragraphs 72 and 76 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Modification and derecognition
Modification of an insurance contract

72 If the terms of an insurance contract are modified, for example by agreement
between the parties to the contract or by a change in regulation, an entity
shall derecognise the original contract and recognise the modified contract as
a new contract, applying IFRS 17 or other applicable Standards if, and only if,
any of the conditions in (a)–(c) are satisfied. The exercise of a right included in
the terms of a contract is not a modification. The conditions are that:
(a) if the modified terms had been included at contract inception:
(i) the modified contract would have been excluded from the
scope of IFRS 17, applying paragraphs 3–8A8;
(ii) ...
...
Derecognition
...
76 An entity derecognises an insurance contract from within a group of contracts

by applying the following requirements in IFRS 17:
...
(c) the number of coverage units for expected remaining insurance

contract servicescoverage is adjusted to reflect the coverage units
derecognised from the group, and the amount of the contractual
service margin recognised in profit or loss in the period is based on
that adjusted number, applying paragraph B119.
...
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraphs 78–79 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Presentation in the statement of financial position

78 An entity shall present separately in the statement of financial position the
carrying amount of portfoliosgroups of:
(a) insurance contracts issued that are assets;
(b) insurance contracts issued that are liabilities;
(c) reinsurance contracts held that are assets; and
(d) reinsurance contracts held that are liabilities.
79 An entity shall include any assets or liabilities for insurance acquisition cash
flows recognised applying paragraph 28B27 in the carrying amount of the
related portfoliosgroups of insurance contracts issued, and any assets or
liabilities for cash flows related to portfoliosgroups of reinsurance contracts
held (see paragraph 65(b)65(a)) in the carrying amount of the portfoliosgroups
of reinsurance contracts held.
Paragraphs 83, 86 and 88‒89 are amended and paragraph 87A is added. New text is
underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Recognition and presentation in the statement(s) of financial

performance (paragraphs B120–B136)
...
Insurance service result

83 An entity shall present in profit or loss insurance revenue arising from the
groups of insurance contracts issued. Insurance revenue shall depict the
provision of coverage and other services arising from the group of
insurance contracts at an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those services. Paragraphs
B120–B127 specify how an entity measures insurance revenue.
...
86 An entity may present the income or expenses from a group of reinsurance

contracts held (see paragraphs 60–70A70), other than insurance finance
income or expenses, as a single amount; or the entity may present separately
the amounts recovered from the reinsurer and an allocation of the premiums
paid that together give a net amount equal to that single amount. If an entity
presents separately the amounts recovered from the reinsurer and an
allocation of the premiums paid, it shall:
(a) ...
(b) treat amounts from the reinsurer that it expects to receive that are not
contingent on claims of the underlying contracts (for example, some
types of ceding commissions) as a reduction in the premiums to be
paid to the reinsurer; and
(ba) treat amounts recognised relating to recovery of losses applying

paragraphs 66(c)(i)‒(ii) and 66A‒66B as amounts recovered from the
reinsurer; and
(c) not present the allocation of premiums paid as a reduction in revenue.
Insurance finance income or expenses (see paragraphs

B128–B136)
...
87A An entity shall apply:
(a) paragraph B117A to insurance finance income or expenses arising

from the application of paragraph B115 (risk mitigation); and
(b) paragraphs 88 and 89 to all other insurance finance income or

expenses.
88 In applying paragraph 87A(b), unlessUnless paragraph 89 applies, an entity

shall make an accounting policy choice between:
...
89 In applying paragraph 87A(b), forFor insurance contracts with direct
participation features, for which the entity holds the underlying items, an
entity shall make an accounting policy choice between:
...
Disclosure
...
Paragraphs 97, 99–101, 103–105, 106‒107 and 109 are amended, paragraphs
105A–105B, and 109A are added. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Explanation of recognised amounts

97 Of the disclosures required by paragraphs 98–109A109, only those in
paragraphs 98–100, 102‒103, 105‒105B and 109A and 102–105 apply to
contracts to which the premium allocation approach has been applied. If an
entity uses the premium allocation approach, it shall also disclose:
...
99 An entity shall provide enough information in the reconciliations to enable
users of financial statements to identify changes from cash flows and amounts
that are recognised in the statement(s) of financial performance. To comply
with this requirement, an entity shall:
IFRS STANDARD
(a) disclose, in a table, the reconciliations set out in paragraphs 100–

105B105; and
(b) for each reconciliation, present the net carrying amounts at the
beginning and at the end of the period, disaggregated into a total for
portfoliosgroups of contracts that are assets and a total for
portfoliosgroups of contracts that are liabilities, that equal the
amounts presented in the statement of financial position applying
paragraph 78.
100 An entity shall disclose reconciliations from the opening to the closing
balances separately for each of:
...
(c) the liabilities for incurred claims. For insurance contracts to which the
premium allocation approach described in paragraphs 53–59 or 69–
70A70 has been applied, an entity shall disclose separate
reconciliations for:
...
101 For insurance contracts other than those to which the premium allocation
approach described in paragraphs 53–59 or 69–70A70 has been applied, an
entity shall also disclose reconciliations from the opening to the closing
balances separately for each of:
...
103 An entity shall separately disclose in the reconciliations required in
paragraph 100 each of the following amounts related to insurance services, if
applicable:
...
(c) investment components excluded from insurance revenue and

insurance service expenses (combined with refunds of premiums
unless refunds of premiums are presented as part of the cash flows in
the period described in paragraph 105(a)(i)).
104 An entity shall separately disclose in the reconciliations required in

paragraph 101 each of the following amounts related to insurance services, if
applicable:
(a) ...
(b) changes that relate to current service, ie:
(i) ...
(ii) the change in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk that
does not relate to future service or past service; and
(iii) experience adjustments (see paragraphs B97(c) and B113(a)),

excluding amounts relating to the risk adjustment for non-
financial risk included in (ii).
(c) ...
105 To complete the reconciliations in paragraphs 100–101, an entity shall also

disclose separately each of the following amounts not related to insurance
services provided in the period, if applicable:
...
105A An entity shall disclose a reconciliation from the opening to the closing
balance of assets for insurance acquisition cash flows recognised applying
paragraph 28B. An entity shall aggregate information for the reconciliation at
a level that is consistent with that for the reconciliation of insurance
contracts, applying paragraph 98.
105B An entity shall separately disclose in the reconciliation required by

paragraph 105A any impairment losses and reversals of impairment losses
recognised applying paragraph 28E–28F.
106 For insurance contracts issued other than those to which the premium
allocation approach described in paragraphs 53–59 has been applied, an entity
shall disclose an analysis of the insurance revenue recognised in the period
comprising:
(a) the amounts relating to the changes in the liability for remaining
coverage as specified in paragraph B124, separately disclosing:
(i) ...
(ii) the change in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk, as

specified in paragraph B124(b); and
(iii) the amount of the contractual service margin recognised in

profit or loss because of the transfer of insurance contract
services in the period, as specified in paragraph B124(c); and.
(iv) other amounts, if any, for example, experience adjustments for

premium receipts other than those that relate to future service
as specified in paragraph B124(d).
(b) the allocation of the portion of the premiums that relate to the
recovery of insurance acquisition cash flows (see paragraph B125).
entity shall disclose the effect on the statement of financial position
separately for insurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held that
are initially recognised in the period, showing their effect at initial
recognition on:
...
entity shall disclose an explanation of when it expects to recognise the
contractual service margin remaining at the end of the reporting period in
profit or loss, either quantitatively, in appropriate time bands, or by providing
qualitative information. Such information shall be provided separately for
insurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held.
IFRS STANDARD
109A An entity shall disclose quantitatively, in appropriate time bands, when it

expects to derecognise an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows applying
paragraph 28C.
...
Transition amounts
114 An entity shall provide disclosures that enable users of financial statements to
identify the effect of groups of insurance contracts measured at the transition
date applying the modified retrospective approach (see paragraphs C6–
C19AC19) or the fair value approach (see paragraphs C20–C24BC24) on the
contractual service margin and insurance revenue in subsequent periods.
Hence an entity shall disclose the reconciliation of the contractual service
margin applying paragraph 101(c), and the amount of insurance revenue
applying paragraph 103(a), separately for:
...
Significant judgements in applying IFRS 17

117 An entity shall disclose the significant judgements and changes in judgements
made in applying IFRS 17. Specifically, an entity shall disclose the inputs,
assumptions and estimation techniques used, including:
...
(c) to the extent not covered in (a), the approach used:
...
(iii) to determine discount rates; and
(iv) to determine investment components; and.
(v) to determine the relative weighting of the benefits provided by

insurance coverage and investment-return service or by
insurance coverage and investment-related service (see
paragraphs B119–B119B).
...
Paragraphs 128–129 and 132 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is
struck through.
Nature and extent of risks that arise from contracts within

the scope of IFRS 17
...
Insurance and market risks—sensitivity analysis

128 An entity shall disclose information about sensitivities to changes in
risk variablesexposures arising from contracts within the scope of IFRS 17. To
comply with this requirement, an entity shall disclose:
(a) a sensitivity analysis that shows how profit or loss and equity would
have been affected by changes in risk variablesexposures that were
reasonably possible at the end of the reporting period:
(i) ...
(ii) for each type of market risk—in a way that explains the
relationship between the sensitivities to changes in
risk variablesexposures arising from insurance contracts and
those arising from financial assets held by the entity.
...
129 If an entity prepares a sensitivity analysis that shows how amounts different
from those specified in paragraph 128(a) are affected by changes in risk
variablesexposures and uses that sensitivity analysis to manage risks arising
from contracts within the scope of IFRS 17, it may use that sensitivity analysis
in place of the analysis specified in paragraph 128(a). The entity shall also
disclose:
...
Liquidity risk—other information

132 For liquidity risk arising from contracts within the scope of IFRS 17, an entity
shall disclose:
(a) ...
(b) separate maturity analyses for portfoliosgroups of insurance contracts

issued that are liabilities and portfoliosgroups of reinsurance contracts
held that are liabilities that show, as a minimum, net cash flows of the
portfoliosgroups for each of the first five years after the reporting date
and in aggregate beyond the first five years. An entity is not required
to include in these analyses liabilities for remaining coverage
measured applying paragraphs 55–59 and paragraphs 69–70A. The
analyses may take the form of:
...
(c) the amounts that are payable on demand, explaining the relationship
between such amounts and the carrying amount of the related
portfoliosgroups of contracts, if not disclosed applying (b) of this
paragraph.
IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to Appendix A—Defined terms
The definitions of ‘contractual service margin’, ‘coverage period’, ‘group of insurance

contracts’ and ‘insurance acquisition cash flows’ are amended. New text is underlined and
contractual service A component of the carrying amount of the asset or liability for
margin a group of insurance contracts representing the unearned
profit the entity will recognise as it provides insurance
contract servicesservices under the insurance contracts in the
group.
coverage period The period during which the entity provides insurance
contract servicescoverage for insured events. This period
includes the insurance contract services that relatecoverage
that relates to all premiums within the boundary of the
insurance contract.
...
group of insurance A set of insurance contracts resulting from the division of a
contracts portfolio of insurance contracts into, at a minimum, contracts
issuedwritten within a period of no longer than one year and
that, at initial recognition:
(a) are onerous, if any;
(b) have no significant possibility of becoming onerous

subsequently, if any; or
(c) do not fall into either (a) or (b), if any.
insurance acquisition Cash flows arising from the costs of selling, underwriting and
cash flows starting a group of insurance contracts (issued or expected to
be issued) that are directly attributable to the portfolio of
insurance contracts to which the group belongs. Such cash
flows include cash flows that are not directly attributable to
individual contracts or groups of insurance contracts within
the portfolio.
...
A new definition is added after the definition of ‘insurance contract’. New text is
underlined.
insurance contract The following services that an entity provides to a policyholder

services of an insurance contract:
(a) coverage for an insured event (insurance coverage);
(b) for insurance contracts without direct participation

features, the generation of an investment return for the
policyholder, if applicable (investment-return service);
and
(c) for insurance contracts with direct participation

features, the management of underlying items on
behalf of the policyholder (investment-related service).
...
The definitions of ‘investment component’, ‘liability for incurred claims’ and ‘liability for
remaining coverage’ are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
investment The amounts that an insurance contract requires the entity to

component repay to a policyholder in all circumstances, regardless of
whether an insured event occurseven if an insured event does
not occur.
...
liability for incurred An entity’s obligation to:
claims
(a) investigate and pay valid claims for insured events that
have already occurred, including events that have
occurred but for which claims have not been reported,
and other incurred insurance expenses; and.
(b) pay amounts that are not included in (a) and that relate
to:
(i) insurance contract services that have already

been provided; or
(ii) any investment components or other amounts

that are not related to the provision of insurance
contract services and that are not in the
liability for remaining coverage.
liability for remaining An entity’s obligation to:

coverage
(a) investigate and pay valid claims under existing
insurance contracts for insured events that have not
yet occurred (ie the obligation that relates to the
unexpired portion of the insurance coveragecoverage
period); and.
(b) pay amounts under existing insurance contracts that

are not included in (a) and that relate to:
IFRS STANDARD
(i) insurance contract services not yet provided (ie

the obligations that relate to future provision of
insurance contract services); or
(ii) any investment components or other amounts

that are not related to the provision of insurance
contract services and that have not been
transferred to the liability for incurred claims.
...
Amendments to Appendix B—Application guidance
Paragraph B1 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
B1 This appendix provides guidance on the following:
...
(ba) asset for insurance acquisition cash flows (see paragraphs B35A–B35D);
(c) measurement (see paragraphs B36–B119FB119);
...
Paragraphs B5 and B12 are amended. New text is underlined.
Definition of an insurance contract (Appendix A)

...
Uncertain future event

...
B5 Some insurance contracts cover events that have already occurred but the
financial effect of which is still uncertain. An example is an insurance
contract that provides insurance coverage against an adverse development of
an event that has already occurred. In such contracts, the insured event is the
determination of the ultimate cost of those claims.
...
The distinction between insurance risk and other risks

...
B12 The definition of an insurance contract refers to an adverse effect on the

policyholder. This definition does not limit the payment by the entity to an
amount equal to the financial effect of the adverse event. For example, the
definition includes ‘new for old’ insurance coverage that pays the policyholder
an amount that permits the replacement of a used and damaged asset with a
new one. Similarly, the definition does not limit the payment under a life
insurance contract to the financial loss suffered by the deceased’s dependants,
nor does it exclude contracts that specify the payment of predetermined
amounts to quantify the loss caused by death or an accident.
...
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraphs B33‒B35 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Promises to transfer distinct goods or non-insurance

services other than insurance contract services
(paragraph 12)
B33 Paragraph 12 requires an entity to separate from an insurance contract a
promise to transfer distinct goods or non-insurance services other than
insurance contract services to a policyholder. For the purpose of separation,
an entity shall not consider activities that an entity must undertake to fulfil a
contract unless the entity transfers a good or service other than insurance
contract services to the policyholder as those activities occur. For example, an
entity may need to perform various administrative tasks to set up a contract.
The performance of those tasks does not transfer a service to the policyholder
as the tasks are performed.
B34 A good or non-insurance service other than an insurance contract service

promised to a policyholder is distinct if the policyholder can benefit from the
good or service either on its own or together with other resources readily
available to the policyholder. Readily available resources are goods or services
that are sold separately (by the entity or by another entity), or resources that
the policyholder has already got (from the entity or from other transactions or
events).
B35 A good or non-insurance service other than an insurance contract service that
is promised to the policyholder is not distinct if:
(a) ...
(b) the entity provides a significant service in integrating the good or non-
insurance service with the insurance components.
Paragraphs B35A–B35D and the heading above paragraph B35A are added. New text is
underlined.
Insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraphs 28A‒28F)

B35A To apply paragraph 28A, an entity shall use a systematic and rational method
to allocate:
(a) insurance acquisition cash flows directly attributable to a group of

insurance contracts:
(i) to that group; and
(ii) to groups that will include insurance contracts that are

expected to arise from renewals of the insurance contracts in
that group.
(b) insurance acquisition cash flows directly attributable to a portfolio of

insurance contracts, other than those in (a), to groups of contracts in
the portfolio.
B35B At the end of each reporting period, an entity shall revise amounts allocated
as specified in paragraph B35A to reflect any changes in assumptions that
determine the inputs to the method of allocation used. An entity shall not
change amounts allocated to a group of insurance contracts after all contracts
have been added to the group (see paragraph B35C).
B35C An entity might add insurance contracts to a group of insurance contracts

across more than one reporting period (see paragraph 28). In those
circumstances, an entity shall derecognise the portion of an asset for
insurance acquisition cash flows that relates to insurance contracts added to
the group in that period and continue to recognise an asset for insurance
acquisition cash flows to the extent that the asset relates to insurance
contracts expected to be added to the group in a future reporting period.
B35D To apply paragraph 28E:
(a) an entity shall recognise an impairment loss in profit or loss and

reduce the carrying amount of an asset for insurance acquisition cash
flows so that the carrying amount of the asset does not exceed the
expected net cash inflow for the related group of insurance contracts,
determined applying paragraph 32(a).
(b) when an entity allocates insurance acquisition cash flows to groups of

insurance contracts applying paragraph B35A(a)(ii), the entity shall
recognise an impairment loss in profit or loss and reduce the carrying
amount of the related assets for insurance acquisition cash flows to the
extent that:
(i) the entity expects those insurance acquisition cash flows to

exceed the net cash inflow for the expected renewals,
determined applying paragraph 32(a); and
(ii) the excess determined applying (b)(i) has not already been
recognised as an impairment loss applying (a).
Paragraphs B64–B66 and B71–B72 are amended and paragraph B66A is added. New
Measurement (paragraphs 29–71)
Estimates of future cash flows (paragraphs 33–35)

...
Cash flows within the contract boundary (paragraph 34)

...
B64 Paragraph 34 refers to an entity’s practical ability to set a price at a future

date (a renewal date) that fully reflects the risks in the contract from that
date. An entity has that practical ability in the absence of constraints that
prevent the entity from setting the same price it would for a new contract
with the same characteristics as the existing contract issued on that date, or if
IFRS STANDARD
it can amend the benefits to be consistent with the price it will charge.
Similarly, an entity has that practical ability to set a price when it can reprice
an existing contract so that the price reflects overall changes in the risks in a
portfolio of insurance contracts, even if the price set for each individual
policyholder does not reflect the change in risk for that specific policyholder.
When assessing whether the entity has the practical ability to set a price that
fully reflects the risks in the contract or portfolio, it shall consider all the
risks that it would consider when underwriting equivalent contracts on the
renewal date for the remaining servicecoverage. In determining the estimates
of future cash flows at the end of a reporting period, an entity shall reassess
the boundary of an insurance contract to include the effect of changes in
circumstances on the entity’s substantive rights and obligations.
B65 Cash flows within the boundary of an insurance contract are those that relate
directly to the fulfilment of the contract, including cash flows for which the
entity has discretion over the amount or timing. The cash flows within the
boundary include:
...
(ka) costs the entity will incur:
(i) performing investment activity, to the extent the entity

performs that activity to enhance benefits from insurance
coverage for policyholders. Investment activities enhance
benefits from insurance coverage if the entity performs those
activities expecting to generate an investment return from
which policyholders will benefit if an insured event occurs.
(ii) providing investment-return service to policyholders of

insurance contracts without direct participation features (see
paragraph B119B).
(iii) providing investment-related service to policyholders of

insurance contracts with direct participation features.
...
B66 The following cash flows shall not be included when estimating the cash flows
that will arise as the entity fulfils an existing insurance contract:
...
(f) income tax payments and receipts the insurer does not pay or receive
in a fiduciary capacity or that are not specifically chargeable to the
policyholder under the terms of the contract. Such payments and
receipts are recognised, measured and presented separately applying
IAS 12 Income Taxes.
...
B66A Before the recognition of a group of insurance contracts, an entity might be
required to recognise an asset or liability for cash flows related to the group of
insurance contracts other than insurance acquisition cash flows either
because of the occurrence of the cash flows or because of the requirements of
another IFRS Standard. Cash flows are related to the group of insurance
contracts if those cash flows would have been included in the fulfilment cash
flows at the date of initial recognition of the group had they been paid or
received after that date. To apply paragraph 38(c)(ii) an entity shall
derecognise such an asset or liability to the extent that the asset or liability
would not be recognised separately from the group of insurance contracts if
the cash flow or the application of the IFRS Standard occurred at the date of
initial recognition of the group of insurance contracts.
Contracts with cash flows that affect or are affected by cash flows to
policyholders of other contracts
...
B71 After all insurance contract services havethe coverage has been provided to
the contracts in a group, the fulfilment cash flows may still include payments
expected to be made to current policyholders in other groups or future
policyholders. An entity is not required to continue to allocate such fulfilment
cash flows to specific groups but can instead recognise and measure a liability
for such fulfilment cash flows arising from all groups.
Discount rates (paragraph 36)

B72 An entity shall use the following discount rates in applying IFRS 17:
...
(c) to measure the changes to the contractual service margin applying

paragraphs B96(a)‒B96(b) and B96(d)paragraph B96(a)–B96(c) for
insurance contracts without direct participation features—discount
rates applying paragraph 36 determined on initial recognition;
...
Paragraphs B93–B95 are amended, paragraph B95 is bifurcated creating new

paragraph B95A. Paragraphs B95B–B95F and the heading above paragraph B95E are
added. New text is underlined.
Initial recognition of transfers of insurance contracts and

business combinations (paragraph 39)
B93 When an entity acquires insurance contracts issued or reinsurance contracts
held in a transfer of insurance contracts that do not form a business or in a
business combination within the scope of IFRS 3, the entity shall apply
paragraphs 14–24 to identify the groups of contracts acquired, as if it had
entered into the contracts on the date of the transaction.
B94 An entity shall use the consideration received or paid for the contracts as a
proxy for the premiums received. The consideration received or paid for the
contracts excludes the consideration received or paid for any other assets and
liabilities acquired in the same transaction. In a business combination within
the scope of IFRS 3, the consideration received or paid is the fair value of the
contracts at that date. In determining that fair value, an entity shall not apply
paragraph 47 of IFRS 13 (relating to demand features).
IFRS STANDARD
B95 Unless the premium allocation approach for the liability for remaining
coverage in paragraphs 55–59 and 69–70A applies, on initial recognition the
contractual service margin is calculated applying paragraph 38 for acquired
insurance contracts issued and paragraph 65 for acquired reinsurance
contracts held using the consideration received or paid for the contracts as a
proxy for the premiums received or paid at the date of initial recognition.
B95A If acquired insurance contracts issued are onerous, applying paragraph 47, the
entity shall recognise the excess of the fulfilment cash flows over the
consideration paid or received as part of goodwill or gain on a bargain
purchase for contracts acquired in a business combination within the scope of
IFRS 3, or as a loss in profit or loss for contracts acquired in a transfer. The
entity shall establish a loss component of the liability for remaining coverage
for that excess, and apply paragraphs 49–52 to allocate subsequent changes in
fulfilment cash flows to that loss component.
B95B For a group of reinsurance contracts held to which paragraphs 66A–66B apply,
an entity shall determine the loss-recovery component of the asset for
remaining coverage at the date of the transaction by multiplying:
(a) the loss component of the liability for remaining coverage of the
underlying insurance contracts at the date of the transaction; and
(b) the percentage of claims on the underlying insurance contracts the

entity expects at the date of the transaction to recover from the group
of reinsurance contracts held.
B95C The entity shall recognise the amount of the loss-recovery component
determined applying paragraph B95B as part of goodwill or gain on a bargain
purchase for reinsurance contracts held acquired in a business combination
within the scope of IFRS 3, or as income in profit or loss for contracts acquired
in a transfer.
B95D Applying paragraphs 14‒22, at the date of the transaction an entity might
include in an onerous group of insurance contracts both onerous insurance
contracts covered by a group of reinsurance contracts held and onerous
contracts not covered by the group of reinsurance contracts held. To apply
paragraph B95B in such cases, an entity shall use a systematic and rational
basis of allocation to determine the portion of the loss component of the
group of insurance contracts that relates to insurance contracts covered by the
Asset for insurance acquisition cash flows

B95E When an entity acquires insurance contracts issued in a transfer of insurance
contracts that do not form a business or in a business combination within the
scope of IFRS 3, the entity shall recognise an asset for insurance acquisition
cash flows at fair value at the date of the transaction for the rights to obtain:
(a) future insurance contracts that are renewals of insurance contracts

recognised at the date of the transaction; and
(b) future insurance contracts, other than those in (a), after the date of the
transaction without paying again insurance acquisition cash flows the
acquiree has already paid that are directly attributable to the related
portfolio of insurance contracts.
B95F At the date of the transaction, the amount of any asset for insurance
acquisition cash flows shall not be included in the measurement of the
acquired group of insurance contracts applying paragraphs B93‒B95A.
Paragraphs B96–B97 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Changes in the carrying amount of the contractual

service margin for insurance contracts without direct
participation features (paragraph 44)
B96 For insurance contracts without direct participation features, paragraph 44(c)
requires an adjustment to the contractual service margin of a group of
insurance contracts for changes in fulfilment cash flows that relate to future
service. These changes comprise:
(a) experience adjustments arising from premiums received in the period

that relate to future service, and related cash flows such as insurance
acquisition cash flows and premium-based taxes, measured at the
discount rates specified in paragraph B72(c).;
(b) changes in estimates of the present value of the future cash flows in
the liability for remaining coverage, except those described in
paragraph B97(a), measured at the discount rates specified in
paragraph B72(c).;
(c) differences between any investment component expected to become

payable in the period and the actual investment component that
becomes payable in the period. Those differences are determined by
comparing (i) the actual investment component that becomes payable
in the period with (ii) the payment in the period that was expected at
the start of the period plus any insurance finance income or expenses
related to that expected payment before it becomes payable. measured
at the discount rates specified in paragraph B72(c); and
(ca) differences between any loan to a policyholder expected to become

repayable in the period and the actual loan to a policyholder that
becomes repayable in the period. Those differences are determined by
comparing (i) the actual loan to a policyholder that becomes repayable
in the period with (ii) the repayment in the period that was expected at
the start of the period plus any insurance finance income or expenses
related to that expected repayment before it becomes repayable.
(d) changes in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk that relate to
future service. An entity is not required to disaggregate the change in
the risk adjustment for non-financial risk between (i) a change related
to non-financial risk and (ii) the effect of the time value of money and
IFRS STANDARD
changes in the time value of money. If an entity makes such a

disaggregation, it shall adjust the contractual service margin for the
change related to non-financial risk, measured at the discount rates
specified in paragraph B72(c).
B97 An entity shall not adjust the contractual service margin for a group of
insurance contracts without direct participation features for the following
changes in fulfilment cash flows because they do not relate to future service:
(a) the effect of the time value of money and changes in the time value of
money and the effect of financial risk and changes in financial risk.
These effects comprise: (being
(i) the effect, if any, on estimated future cash flows;
(ii) the effect, if disaggregated, on the risk adjustment for non-

financial risk; and
(iii) the effect of a change in discount rate.);
(b) changes in estimates of fulfilment cash flows in the liability for

incurred claims.; and
(c) ...
...
Paragraphs B104, B107, B112, B115–B116 and B118 are amended. Paragraph B117A is
added. Paragraph B101 is not amended, but is included for ease of reference. New text is
Changes in the carrying amount of the contractual

service margin for insurance contracts with direct
participation features (paragraph 45)
B101 Insurance contracts with direct participation features are insurance contracts
that are substantially investment‑related service contracts under which an
entity promises an investment return based on underlying items. Hence, they
are defined as insurance contracts for which:
(a) the contractual terms specify that the policyholder participates in a

share of a clearly identified pool of underlying items (see paragraphs
B105–B106);
(b) the entity expects to pay to the policyholder an amount equal to a

substantial share of the fair value returns on the underlying items (see
paragraph B107); and
(c) the entity expects a substantial proportion of any change in the

amounts to be paid to the policyholder to vary with the change in fair
value of the underlying items (see paragraph B107).
...
B104 The conditions in paragraph B101 ensure that insurance contracts with direct
participation features are contracts under which the entity’s obligation to the
policyholder is the net of:
(a) ...
(b) a variable fee (see paragraphs B110–B118) that the entity will deduct
from (a) in exchange for the future service provided by the insurance
contract, comprising:
(i) the amount of the entity’s share of the fair value of the
underlying items; less
(ii) ...
...
B107 Paragraph B101(b) requires that the entity expects a substantial share of the
fair value returns on the underlying items will be paid to the policyholder and
paragraph B101(c) requires that the entity expects a substantial proportion of
any change in the amounts to be paid to the policyholder to vary with the
change in fair value of the underlying items. An entity shall:
(a) ...
(b) assess the variability in the amounts in paragraphs B101(b) and

B101(c):
(i) over the duration of the insurance contractgroup of insurance

contracts; and
(ii) ...
...
B112 Changes in the amount of the entity’s share of the fair value of the underlying
items (paragraph B104(b)(i)) relate to future service and adjust the contractual
service margin, applying paragraph 45(b).
...
Risk mitigation
B115 To the extent that an entity meets the conditions in paragraph B116, it may
choose not to recognise a change in the contractual service margin to reflect
some or all of the changes in the effect of the time value of money and
financial risk on: the entity’s share of the underlying items (see
paragraph B112) or the fulfilment cash flows set out in paragraph B113(b).
(a) the amount of the entity’s share of the underlying items (see
paragraph B112) if the entity mitigates the effect of financial risk on
that amount using derivatives or reinsurance contracts held; and
(b) the fulfilment cash flows set out in paragraph B113(b) if the entity
mitigates the effect of financial risk on those fulfilment cash flows
using derivatives, non-derivative financial instruments measured at
fair value through profit or loss, or reinsurance contracts held.
IFRS STANDARD
B116 To apply paragraph B115, an entity must have a previously documented risk-
management objective and strategy for mitigating financial risk as described
in paragraph B115.using derivatives to mitigate financial risk arising from the
insurance contracts and, in In applying that objective and strategy:
(a) the entity uses a derivative to mitigate the financial risk arising from
the insurance contracts.
(a)(b) an economic offset exists between the insurance contracts and the
derivative, non-derivative financial instrument measured at fair value
through profit or loss, or reinsurance contract held (ie the values of the
insurance contracts and those risk mitigating itemsthe derivative
generally move in opposite directions because they respond in a
similar way to the changes in the risk being mitigated). An entity shall
not consider accounting measurement differences in assessing the
economic offset.
(b)(c) credit risk does not dominate the economic offset.
...
B117A If the entity mitigates the effect of financial risk using derivatives or non-
derivative financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss,
it shall include insurance finance income or expenses for the period arising
from the application of paragraph B115 in profit or loss. If the entity mitigates
the effect of financial risk using reinsurance contracts held, it shall apply the
same accounting policy for the presentation of insurance finance income or
expenses arising from the application of paragraph B115 as the entity applies
to the reinsurance contracts held applying paragraphs 88 and 90.
B118 If, and only if, any of the conditions in paragraph B116 ceaseceases to be met,
an entity shall:
(a) cease to apply paragraph B115 from that date. ; and
(b) An entity shall not make any adjustment for changes previously
recognised in profit or loss.
Paragraph B119 is amended and paragraphs B119A–B119B are added. New text is
Recognition of the contractual service margin in profit or

loss
B119 An amount of the contractual service margin for a group of insurance
contracts is recognised in profit or loss in each period to reflect the insurance
contract services provided under the group of insurance contracts in that
period (see paragraphs 44(e), 45(e) and 66(e)). The amount is determined by:
(a) identifying the coverage units in the group. The number of coverage
units in a group is the quantity of insurance contract servicescoverage
provided by the contracts in the group, determined by considering for
each contract the quantity of the benefits provided under a contract
and its expected coverage periodduration.
(b) allocating the contractual service margin at the end of the period
(before recognising any amounts in profit or loss to reflect the
insurance contract services provided in the period) equally to each
coverage unit provided in the current period and expected to be
provided in the future.
(c) recognising in profit or loss the amount allocated to coverage units

provided in the period.
B119A To apply paragraph B119, the period of investment-return service or

investment-related service ends at or before the date that all amounts due to
current policyholders relating to those services have been paid, without
considering payments to future policyholders included in the fulfilment cash
flows applying paragraph B68.
B119B Insurance contracts without direct participation features may provide an

investment-return service if, and only if:
(a) an investment component exists, or the policyholder has a right to

withdraw an amount;
(b) the entity expects the investment component or amount the

policyholder has a right to withdraw to include an investment return
(an investment return could be below zero, for example, in a negative
interest rate environment); and
(c) the entity expects to perform investment activity to generate that

investment return.
Paragraphs B119C–B119F and the heading above paragraph BC119C are added. New
Reinsurance contracts held—recognition of recovery of

losses on underlying insurance contracts (paragraphs
66A−66B)
B119C Paragraph 66A applies if, and only if, the reinsurance contract held is entered
into before or at the same time as the onerous underlying insurance contracts
are recognised.
B119D To apply paragraph 66A, an entity shall determine the adjustment to the
contractual service margin of a group of reinsurance contracts held and the
resulting income by multiplying:
(a) the loss recognised on the underlying insurance contracts; and
(b) the percentage of claims on the underlying insurance contracts the

entity expects to recover from the group of reinsurance contracts held.
B119E Applying paragraphs 14‒22, an entity might include in an onerous group of

insurance contracts both onerous insurance contracts covered by a group of
reinsurance contracts held and onerous insurance contracts not covered by
the group of reinsurance contracts held. To apply paragraphs 66(c)(i)‒(ii) and
paragraph 66A in such cases, the entity shall apply a systematic and rational
IFRS STANDARD
method of allocation to determine the portion of losses recognised on the

B119F After an entity has established a loss-recovery component applying

paragraph 66B, the entity shall adjust the loss-recovery component to reflect
changes in the loss component of an onerous group of underlying insurance
contracts (see paragraphs 50–52). The carrying amount of the loss-recovery
component shall not exceed the portion of the carrying amount of the loss
component of the onerous group of underlying insurance contracts that the
Paragraphs B121, B123, B124 and B126 are amended and paragraph B123A is added.
New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Insurance revenue (paragraphs 83 and 85)

...
B121 Paragraph 83 requires the amount of insurance revenue recognised in a period

to depict the transfer of promised services at an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those
services. The total consideration for a group of contracts covers the following
amounts:
(a) amounts related to the provision of services, comprising:
(i) insurance service expenses, excluding any amounts relating to

the risk adjustment for non-financial risk included in (ii) and
any amounts allocated to the loss component of the liability for
remaining coverage;
(ia) amounts related to income tax that are specifically chargeable

to the policyholder;
(ii) the risk adjustment for non-financial risk, excluding any

amounts allocated to the loss component of the liability for
remaining coverage; and
(iii) ...
(b) ...
...
B123 Applying IFRS 15, when an entity provides services, it derecognises the
performance obligation for those services and recognises revenue.
Consistently, applying IFRS 17, when an entity provides services in a period, it
reduces the liability for remaining coverage for the services provided and
recognises insurance revenue. The reduction in the liability for remaining
coverage that gives rise to insurance revenue excludes changes in the liability
that do not relate to services expected to be covered by the consideration
received by the entity. Those changes are:
(a) changes that do not relate to services provided in the period, for
example:
...
(iia) changes resulting from cash flows from loans to policyholders;
...
B123A To the extent that an entity derecognises an asset for cash flows other than
insurance acquisition cash flows at the date of initial recognition of a group of
insurance contracts (see paragraphs 38(c)(ii) and B66A), it shall recognise
insurance revenue and expenses for the amount derecognised at that date.
B124 Consequently, insurance revenue for the period can also be analysed as the
total of the changes in the liability for remaining coverage in the period that
relates to services for which the entity expects to receive consideration. Those
changes are:
(a) insurance service expenses incurred in the period (measured at the

amounts expected at the beginning of the period), excluding:
...
(iii) amounts that relate to transaction-based taxes collected on

behalf of third parties (such as premium taxes, value added
taxes and goods and services taxes) (see paragraph B65(i)); and
(iv) insurance acquisition expenses (see paragraph B125); and.
(v) the amount related to the risk adjustment for non-financial

risk (see (b)).
...
(d) other amounts, if any, for example, experience adjustments for

premium receipts other than those that relate to future service (see
paragraph B96(a)).
...
B126 When an entity applies the premium allocation approach in paragraphs

55–58, insurance revenue for the period is the amount of expected premium
receipts (excluding any investment component and adjusted to reflect the
time value of money and the effect of financial risk, if applicable, applying
paragraph 56) allocated to the period. The entity shall allocate the expected
premium receipts to each period of insurance contract servicescoverage:
...
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraphs B128 and B134 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is
struck through.
Insurance finance income or expenses (paragraphs 87–92)

B128 Paragraph 87 requires an entity to include in insurance finance income or
expenses the effect of the time value of money and financial risk and changes
thereinin assumptions that relate to financial risk. For the purposes of
IFRS 17:
(a) assumptions about inflation based on an index of prices or rates or on

prices of assets with inflation-linked returns are assumptions that
relate to financial risk; and
(b) assumptions about inflation based on an entity’s expectation of

specific price changes are not assumptions that relate to financial risk;
and.
(c) changes in the measurement of a group of insurance contracts caused

by changes in the value of underlying items (excluding additions and
withdrawals) are changes arising from the effect of the time value of
money and financial risk and changes therein.
...
B134 Paragraph 89 applies if an entity, either by choice or because it is required to,

holds the underlying items for insurance contracts with direct participation
features. If an entity chooses to disaggregate insurance finance income or
expenses applying paragraph 89(b), it shall include in profit or loss expenses or
income that exactly match the income or expenses included in profit or loss
for the underlying items, resulting in the net of the two separately presented
items being nil.
...
Paragraph B137 and its heading are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is
struck through.
The effect of accounting estimates made in interimInterim

financial statements
B137 If an entity prepares interim financial statements applying IAS 34 Interim
Financial Reporting, the entity shall make an accounting policy choice as to
whether to change the treatment of accounting estimates made in previous
interim financial statements when applying IFRS 17 in subsequent interim
financial statements and in the annual reporting period. The entity shall apply
its choice of accounting policy to all groups of insurance contracts it issues
and groups of reinsurance contracts it holds.Notwithstanding the requirement
in IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting that the frequency of an entity’s reporting
shall not affect the measurement of its annual results, an entity shall not
change the treatment of accounting estimates made in previous interim
financial statements when applying IFRS 17 in subsequent interim financial

statements or in the annual reporting period.
IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to Appendix C—Effective date and transition
Paragraph C1 is amended. Paragraph C2 is not amended, but is included for ease of

reference. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Effective date
C1 An entity shall apply IFRS 17 for annual reporting periods beginning on or
after 1 January 20232021. If an entity applies IFRS 17 earlier, it shall disclose
that fact. Early application is permitted for entities that apply IFRS 9 Financial
Instruments and IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers on or before the
date of initial application of IFRS 17.
C2 For the purposes of the transition requirements in paragraphs C1 and C3–C33:
(a) the date of initial application is the beginning of the annual reporting
period in which an entity first applies IFRS 17; and
(b) the transition date is the beginning of the annual reporting period
immediately preceding the date of initial application.
Paragraphs C3‒C5 are amended and paragraphs C5A‒C5B are added. New text is
Transition
C3 Unless it is impracticable to do so, or paragraph C5A applies, anAn entity shall
apply IFRS 17 retrospectively unless impracticable, except that:
(a) ...
(b) an entity shall not apply the option in paragraph B115 for periods
before the transition datedate of initial application of IFRS 17. An
entity may apply the option in paragraph B115 prospectively on or
after the transition date if, and only if, the entity designates risk
mitigation relationships at or before the date it applies the option.
C4 To apply IFRS 17 retrospectively, an entity shall at the transition date:
(a) ...
(aa) identify, recognise and measure any assets for insurance acquisition
cash flows as if IFRS 17 had always applied (except that an entity is not
required to apply the recoverability assessment in paragraph 28E
before the transition date);
...
C5 If, and only if, it is impracticable for an entity to apply paragraph C3 for a
group of insurance contracts, an entity shall apply the following approaches
instead of applying paragraph C4(a):
(a) the modified retrospective approach in paragraphs C6–C19AC19,

subject to paragraph C6(a); or
(b) the fair value approach in paragraphs C20–C24BC24.
C5A Notwithstanding paragraph C5, an entity may choose to apply the fair value
approach in paragraphs C20–C24B for a group of insurance contracts with
direct participation features to which it could apply IFRS 17 retrospectively if,
and only if:
(a) the entity chooses to apply the risk mitigation option in

paragraph B115 to the group of insurance contracts prospectively from
the transition date; and
(b) the entity has used derivatives, non-derivative financial instruments

measured at fair value through profit or loss, or reinsurance contracts
held to mitigate financial risk arising from the group of insurance
contracts, as specified in paragraph B115, before the transition date.
C5B If, and only if, it is impracticable for an entity to apply paragraph C4(aa) for an
asset for insurance acquisition cash flows, the entity shall apply the following
approaches to measure the asset for insurance acquisition cash flows:
(a) the modified retrospective approach in paragraphs C14B–C14D, subject

to paragraph C6(a); or
(b) the fair value approach in paragraphs C24A–C24B.
Paragraphs C7‒C9, C11 and C15–C16 and C17 are amended. Paragraphs C9A, C14A‒
C14D, C16A‒C16C and C17A are added. New text is underlined and deleted text is stuck
through.
Modified retrospective approach

...
C7 Paragraphs C9–C19AC19 set out permitted modifications to retrospective

application in the following areas:
...
C8 To achieve the objective of the modified retrospective approach, an entity is
permitted to use each modification in paragraphs C9–C19AC19 only to the
extent that an entity does not have reasonable and supportable information to
apply a retrospective approach.
Assessments at inception or initial recognition

C9 To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, an entity shall determine the
following matters using information available at the transition date:
(a) ...
(b) whether an insurance contract meets the definition of an insurance

contract with direct participation features, applying paragraphs
B101–B109; and
IFRS STANDARD
(c) how to identify discretionary cash flows for insurance contracts

without direct participation features, applying paragraphs B98–B100;
and.
(d) whether an investment contract meets the definition of an investment

contract with discretionary participation features within the scope of
IFRS 17, applying paragraph 71.
C9A To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, an entity shall classify as a liability
for incurred claims a liability for settlement of claims incurred before an
insurance contract was acquired in a transfer of insurance contracts that do
not form a business or in a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3.
...
Determining the contractual service margin or loss component for

groups of insurance contracts without direct participation features
C11 To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, for contracts without direct
participation features, an entity shall determine the contractual service
margin or loss component of the liability for remaining coverage (see
paragraphs 49–52) at the transition date by applying paragraphs C12–
C16CC16.
...
C14A Applying paragraph B137, an entity may choose not to change the treatment
of accounting estimates made in previous interim financial statements. To the
extent permitted by paragraph C8, such an entity shall determine the
contractual service margin or loss component at the transition date as if the
entity had not prepared interim financial statements before the transition
date.
C14B To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, an entity shall use the same
systematic and rational method the entity expects to use after the transition
date when applying paragraph 28A to allocate any insurance acquisition cash
flows paid (or for which a liability has been recognised applying another IFRS
Standard) before the transition date (excluding any amount relating to
insurance contracts that ceased to exist before the transition date) to:
(a) groups of insurance contracts that are recognised at the transition

date; and
(b) groups of insurance contracts that are expected to be recognised after

the transition date.
C14C Insurance acquisition cash flows paid before the transition date that are
allocated to a group of insurance contracts recognised at the transition date
adjust the contractual service margin of that group, to the extent insurance
contracts expected to be in the group have been recognised at that date (see
paragraphs 28C and B35C). Other insurance acquisition cash flows paid before
the transition date, including those allocated to a group of insurance contracts
expected to be recognised after the transition date, are recognised as an asset,
applying paragraph 28B.
C14D If an entity does not have reasonable and supportable information to apply
paragraph C14B, the entity shall determine the following amounts to be nil at
the transition date:
(a) the adjustment to the contractual service margin of a group of

insurance contracts recognised at the transition date and any asset for
insurance acquisition cash flows relating to that group; and
(b) the asset for insurance acquisition cash flows for groups of insurance
contracts expected to be recognised after the transition date.
C15 If applying paragraphs C12–C14DC14 results in a contractual service margin

at the date of initial recognition, to determine the contractual service margin
at the date of transition an entity shall:
...
C16 If applying paragraphs C12–C14DC14 results in a loss component of the
liability for remaining coverage at the date of initial recognition, an entity
shall determine any amounts allocated to the loss component before the
transition date applying paragraphs C12–C14DC14 and using a systematic
basis of allocation.
C16A For a group of reinsurance contracts held that provides coverage for an
onerous group of insurance contracts and was entered into before or at the
same time that the insurance contracts were issued, an entity shall establish a
loss-recovery component of the asset for remaining coverage at the transition
date (see paragraphs 66A–66B). To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, an
entity shall determine the loss-recovery component by multiplying:
(a) the loss component of the liability for remaining coverage for the
underlying insurance contracts at the transition date (see paragraphs
C16 and C20); and
(b) the percentage of claims for the underlying insurance contracts the
C16B Applying paragraphs 14‒22, at the transition date an entity might include in
an onerous group of insurance contracts both onerous insurance contracts
covered by a group of reinsurance contracts held and onerous insurance
paragraph C16A in such cases, an entity shall use a systematic and rational
C16C If an entity does not have reasonable and supportable information to apply
paragraph C16A, the entity shall not identify a loss-recovery component for
the group of reinsurance contracts held.
IFRS STANDARD
Determining the contractual service margin or loss component for

groups of insurance contracts with direct participation features
C17 To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, for contracts with direct
participation features an entity shall determine the contractual service margin
or loss component of the liability for remaining coverage at the transition date
as:
(a) the total fair value of the underlying items at that date; minus
(b) the fulfilment cash flows at that date; plus or minus
(c) an adjustment for:
...
(iv) insurance acquisition cash flows paid (or for which a liability
has been recognised applying another IFRS Standard) before the
transition date that are allocated to the group (see
paragraph C17A).
(d) if (a)–(c) result in a contractual service margin—minus the amount of

the contractual service margin that relates to services provided before
that date. The total of (a)–(c) is a proxy for the total contractual service
margin for all services to be provided under the group of contracts,
ie before any amounts that would have been recognised in profit or
loss for services provided. The entity shall estimate the amounts that
would have been recognised in profit or loss for services provided by
comparing the remaining coverage units at the transition date with
the coverage units provided under the group of contracts before the
transition date; or
(e) if (a)–(c) result in a loss component—adjust the loss component to nil

and increase the liability for remaining coverage excluding the loss
component by the same amount.
C17A To the extent permitted by paragraph C8, an entity shall apply paragraphs
C14B‒C14D to recognise an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows, and any
adjustment to the contractual service margin of a group of insurance
contracts with direct participation features for insurance acquisition cash
flows (see paragraph C17(c)(iv)).
Paragraph C19A is added. New text is underlined.
Insurance finance income or expenses

...
C19A Applying paragraph B137, an entity may choose not to change the treatment
of accounting estimates made in previous interim financial statements. To the
extent permitted by paragraph C8, such an entity shall determine amounts
related to insurance finance income or expenses at the transition date as if it
had not prepared interim financial statements before the transition date.
Paragraphs C20A‒C20B and C22A are added and paragraph C21 is amended. New text
is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Fair value approach

...
C20A For a group of reinsurance contracts held to which paragraphs 66A–66B apply
(without the need to meet the condition set out in paragraph B119C), an entity
shall determine the loss-recovery component of the asset for remaining
coverage at the transition date by multiplying:
(a) the loss component of the liability for remaining coverage for the
underlying insurance contracts at the transition date (see paragraphs
C16 and C20); and
(b) the percentage of claims for the underlying insurance contracts the
C20B Applying paragraphs 14‒22, at the transition date an entity might include in
an onerous group of insurance contracts both onerous insurance contracts
covered by a group of reinsurance contracts held and onerous insurance
paragraph C20A in such cases, an entity shall use a systematic and rational
C21 In applying the fair value approach, an entity may apply paragraph C22 to
determine:
(a) ...
(b) whether an insurance contract meets the definition of an insurance

contract with direct participation features, applying paragraphs
B101–B109; and
(c) how to identify discretionary cash flows for insurance contracts

without direct participation features, applying paragraphs B98–B100;
and.
(d) whether an investment contract meets the definition of an investment

contract with discretionary participation features within the scope of
IFRS 17, applying paragraph 71.
...
C22A In applying the fair value approach, an entity may choose to classify as a
liability for incurred claims a liability for settlement of claims incurred before
an insurance contract was acquired in a transfer of insurance contracts that
do not form a business or in a business combination within the scope of
IFRS 3.
...
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraphs C24A‒C24B and the heading above paragraphs C24A‒C24B are added. New
text is underlined.
Asset for insurance acquisition cash flows

C24A In applying the fair value approach for an asset for insurance acquisition cash
flows (see paragraph C5B(b)), at the transition date, an entity shall determine
an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows at an amount equal to the
insurance acquisition cash flows the entity would incur at the transition date
for the rights to obtain:
(a) recoveries of insurance acquisition cash flows from premiums of

insurance contracts issued before the transition date but not
recognised at the transition date;
(b) future insurance contracts that are renewals of insurance contracts

recognised at the date of the transaction and insurance contracts
described in (a); and
(c) future insurance contracts, other than those in (b), after the date of the
transaction without paying again insurance acquisition cash flows the
acquiree has already paid that are directly attributable to the related
portfolio of insurance contracts.
C24B At the transition date, the entity shall exclude from the measurement of any
groups of insurance contracts the amount of any asset for insurance
acquisition cash flows.
Paragraph C34 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Withdrawal of other IFRS Standards

C34 IFRS 17 supersedes IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts, as amended in 20202016.
Amendments to Appendix D—Amendments to other IFRS

Standards
This appendix sets out the amendments to other Standards that are a consequence of the
International Accounting Standards Board amending IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts in June
2020. An entity shall apply these amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
IFRS 3 Business Combinations
In the amendments to IFRS 3 Business Combinations, paragraphs 31A and 64N are
amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
...
Insurance contracts
31A The acquirer shall measure a group of contracts within the scope of IFRS 17
Insurance Contracts acquired in a business combination, and any assets for
insurance acquisition cash flows as defined in IFRS 17, as a liability or asset in
accordance with paragraphs 39 and B93–B95FB95 of IFRS 17, at the acquisition
date.
...
Effective date
...
64N IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraphs 17, 20, 21, 35 and B63, and
after paragraph 31 added a heading and paragraph 31A. Amendments to IFRS 17,
issued in June 2020, amended paragraph 31A. An entity shall apply the
amendments to paragraph 17 to business combinations with an acquisition
date after the date of initial application of IFRS 17. An entity shall apply the
otherthose amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
...
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
In the amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, paragraphs 3 and 44DD

are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Scope
3 This IFRS shall be applied by all entities to all types of financial instruments,
except:
...
IFRS STANDARD
(d) insurance contracts as defined incontracts within the scope of IFRS 17

Insurance Contracts or investment contracts with discretionary
participation features within the scope of IFRS 17. However, this IFRS
applies to:
(i) derivatives that are embedded in contracts within the scope of

IFRS 17, if IFRS 9 requires the entity to account for them
separately.; and
(ii) investment components that are separated from contracts

within the scope of IFRS 17, if IFRS 17 requires such separation,
unless the separated investment component is an investment
contract with discretionary participation features.
(iii) an issuer’s rights and obligations arising under insurance

contracts that meet the definition ofMoreover, an issuer shall
apply this IFRS to financial guarantee contracts, if the issuer
applies IFRS 9 in recognising and measuring the contracts.
However, the issuer, but shall apply IFRS 17 if the issuer elects,
in accordance with paragraph 7(e) of IFRS 17, to apply IFRS 17
in recognising and measuring the contractsthem.
(iv) an entity’s rights and obligations that are financial instruments

arising under credit card contracts, or similar contracts that
provide credit or payment arrangements, that an entity issues
that meet the definition of an insurance contract if the entity
applies IFRS 9 to those rights and obligations in accordance
with paragraph 7(h) of IFRS 17 and paragraph 2.1(e)(iv) of
IFRS 9.
(v) an entity’s rights and obligations that are financial instruments

arising under insurance contracts that an entity issues that
limit the compensation for insured events to the amount
otherwise required to settle the policyholder’s obligation
created by the contract, if the entity elects, in accordance with
paragraph 8A of IFRS 17, to apply IFRS 9 instead of IFRS 17 to
such contracts.
(e) ...
...
Effective date and transition

...
44DD IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraphs 3, 8 and 29 and deleted
paragraph 30. Amendments to IFRS 17, issued in June 2020, further amended
paragraph 3. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
In the amendments to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, paragraphs 2.1 and 7.1.6 are
amended. A new heading and paragraphs 7.2.36–7.2.42 are added. New text is
Chapter 2 Scope
2.1 This Standard shall be applied by all entities to all types of financial
instruments except:
...
(e) rights and obligations arising under an insurance contract as

defined ina contract within the scope of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts,
other than an issuer’s rights and obligations arising under an
insurance contract that meets the definition of a financial
guarantee contractor an investment contract with discretionary
participation features within the scope of IFRS 17. However, this
Standard applies to:
(i) derivativesa derivative that areis embedded in contractsa

contract within the scope of IFRS 17, if the derivatives are
not themselves contractsderivative is not itself a contract
within the scope of IFRS 17.; and
(ii) investment componentsan investment component that areis

separated from contractsa contract within the scope of
IFRS 17, if IFRS 17 requires such separation, unless the
separated investment component is an investment contract
with discretionary participation features within the scope of
IFRS 17.
(iii) an issuer’s rights and obligations under insurance contracts

that meet the definition of a financial guarantee contract.
HoweverMoreover, if an issuer of financial guarantee
contracts has previously asserted explicitly that it regards
such contracts as insurance contracts and has used
accounting that is applicable to insurance contracts, the
issuer may elect to apply either this Standard or IFRS 17 to
such financial guarantee contracts (see paragraphs
B2.5–B2.6). The issuer may make that election contract by
contract, but the election for each contract is irrevocable.
(iv) an entity’s rights and obligations that are financial

instruments arising under credit card contracts, or similar
contracts that provide credit or payment arrangements, that
an entity issues that meet the definition of an insurance
contract but which paragraph 7(h) of IFRS 17 excludes from
the scope of IFRS 17. However, if, and only if, the insurance
coverage is a contractual term of such a financial
IFRS STANDARD
instrument, the entity shall separate that component and

apply IFRS 17 to it (see paragraph 7(h) of IFRS 17).
(v) an entity’s rights and obligations that are financial

instruments arising under insurance contracts that an entity
issues that limit the compensation for insured events to the
amount otherwise required to settle the policyholder’s
obligation created by the contract, if the entity elects, in
accordance with paragraph 8A of IFRS 17, to apply IFRS 9
instead of IFRS 17 to such contracts.
(f) ...
...
Chapter 7 Effective date and transition
7.1 Effective date

...
7.1.6 IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraphs 2.1, B2.1, B2.4, B2.5 and
B4.1.30, and added paragraph 3.3.5. Amendments to IFRS 17, issued in June 2020,
further amended paragraph 2.1 and added paragraphs 7.2.36‒7.2.42. An entity
shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
...
7.2 Transition
...
Transition for IFRS 17 as amended in June 2020

7.2.36 An entity shall apply the amendments to IFRS 9 made by IFRS 17 as amended
in June 2020 retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8, except as specified in
paragraphs 7.2.37–7.2.42.
7.2.37 An entity that first applies IFRS 17 as amended in June 2020 at the same time
it first applies this Standard shall apply paragraphs 7.2.1–7.2.28 instead of
paragraphs 7.2.38–7.2.42.
7.2.38 An entity that first applies IFRS 17 as amended in June 2020 after it first
applies this Standard shall apply paragraphs 7.2.39–7.2.42. The entity shall
also apply the other transition requirements in this Standard necessary for
applying these amendments. For that purpose, references to the date of initial
application shall be read as referring to the beginning of the reporting period
in which an entity first applies these amendments (date of initial application
of these amendments).
7.2.39 With regard to designating a financial liability as measured at fair value

through profit or loss, an entity:
(a) shall revoke its previous designation of a financial liability as

measured at fair value through profit or loss if that designation was
previously made in accordance with the condition in paragraph 4.2.2(a)
but that condition is no longer satisfied as a result of the application of
these amendments; and
(b) may designate a financial liability as measured at fair value through

profit or loss if that designation would not have previously satisfied
the condition in paragraph 4.2.2(a) but that condition is now satisfied
as a result of the application of these amendments.
Such a designation and revocation shall be made on the basis of the facts and
circumstances that exist at the date of initial application of these
amendments. That classification shall be applied retrospectively.
7.2.40 An entity is not required to restate prior periods to reflect the application of
these amendments. The entity may restate prior periods only if it is possible to
do so without the use of hindsight. If an entity restates prior periods, the
restated financial statements must reflect all the requirements in this
Standard for the affected financial instruments. If an entity does not restate
prior periods, the entity shall recognise any difference between the previous
carrying amount and the carrying amount at the beginning of the annual
reporting period that includes the date of initial application of these
amendments in the opening retained earnings (or other component of equity,
as appropriate) of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial
application of these amendments.
7.2.41 In the reporting period that includes the date of initial application of these
amendments, an entity is not required to present the quantitative information
required by paragraph 28(f) of IAS 8.
7.2.42 In the reporting period that includes the date of initial application of these
amendments, the entity shall disclose the following information as at that
date of initial application for each class of financial assets and financial
liabilities that was affected by these amendments:
(a) the previous classification, including the previous measurement

category when applicable, and carrying amount determined
immediately before applying these amendments;
(b) the new measurement category and carrying amount determined after
applying these amendments;
(c) the carrying amount of any financial liabilities in the statement of

financial position that were previously designated as measured at fair
value through profit or loss but are no longer so designated; and
(d) the reasons for any designation or de-designation of financial liabilities

as measured at fair value through profit or loss.
IFRS STANDARD
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
In the amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements paragraphs 54 and

139R are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Information to be presented in the statement of financial position

54 The statement of financial position shall include line items that present the
following amounts:
...
(da) portfoliosgroups of contracts within the scope of IFRS 17 that are

assets, disaggregated as required by paragraph 78 of IFRS 17;
...
(ma) portfoliosgroups of contracts within the scope of IFRS 17 that are

liabilities, disaggregated as required by paragraph 78 of IFRS 17;
...
Transition and effective date

...
139R IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraphs 7, 54 and 82. Amendments to
IFRS 17, issued in June 2020, further amended paragraph 54. An entity shall
apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
...
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
In the amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation paragraphs 4 and 97T

Scope
4 This Standard shall be applied by all entities to all types of financial
instruments except:
...
(d) insurance contracts as defined incontracts within the scope of

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts or investment contracts with
discretionary participation features within the scope of IFRS 17.
However, this Standard applies to:
(i) derivatives that are embedded in contracts within the scope

of IFRS 17, if IFRS 9 requires the entity to account for them
separately.; and
(ii) investment components that are separated from contracts

within the scope of IFRS 17, if IFRS 17 requires such
separation, unless the separated investment component is an
investment contract with discretionary participation
features within the scope of IFRS 17.
(iii) an issuer’s rights and obligations arising under insurance

contracts that meet the definition ofMoreover, an issuer
shall apply this Standard to financial guarantee contracts, if
the issuer applies IFRS 9 in recognising and measuring the
contracts. However, the issuer, but shall apply IFRS 17 if the
issuer elects, in accordance with paragraph 7(e) of IFRS 17, to
apply IFRS 17 in recognising and measuring the
contractsthem.
(iv) an entity's rights and obligations that are financial

instruments arising under credit card contracts, or similar
contracts that provide credit or payment arrangements, that
an entity issues that meet the definition of an insurance
contract if the entity applies IFRS 9 to those rights and
obligations in accordance with paragraph 7(h) of IFRS 17 and
paragraph 2.1(e)(iv) of IFRS 9.
(v) an entity's rights and obligations that are financial

instruments arising under insurance contracts that an entity
issues that limit the compensation for insured events to the
amount otherwise required to settle the policyholder's
obligation created by the contract if the entity elects, in
accordance with paragraph 8A of IFRS 17, to apply IFRS 9
instead of IFRS 17 to such contracts.
...
Effective date and transition

...
97T IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraphs 4, AG8 and AG36, and added
paragraph 33A. Amendments to IFRS 17, issued in June 2020, further amended
paragraph 4. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
IFRS STANDARD
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets
In the amendments to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets paragraphs 2 and 140N are amended.
New text is underlined.
Scope
2 This Standard shall be applied in accounting for the impairment of all
assets, other than:
...
(h) contracts within the scope of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts that are
assets and any assets for insurance acquisition cash flows as defined
in IFRS 17; and
...
Transition provisions and effective date

...
140N IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraph 2. Amendments to IFRS 17,
issued in June 2020, further amended paragraph 2. An entity shall apply those
amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
IAS 38 Intangible Assets
In the amendments to IAS 38 Intangible Assets paragraphs 3 and 130M are amended.
New text is underlined.
Scope
...
3 If another Standard prescribes the accounting for a specific type of intangible

asset, an entity applies that Standard instead of this Standard. For example,
this Standard does not apply to:
...
(g) contracts within the scope of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and any assets
for insurance acquisition cash flows as defined in IFRS 17.
(h) ...
...
Transitional provisions and effective date

...
130M IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraph 3. Amendments to IFRS 17,
issued in June 2020, further amended paragraph 3. An entity shall apply those
amendments when it applies IFRS 17.
Approval by the International Accounting Standards Board of

Amendments to IFRS 17 issued in June 2020
Amendments to IFRS 17 was approved for issue by all 14 members of the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman

Suzanne Lloyd Vice-Chair
Nick Anderson
Tadeu Cendon
Martin Edelmann
Françoise Flores
Gary Kabureck
Jianqiao Lu
Darrel Scott
Thomas Scott
Chungwoo Suh
Rika Suzuki
Ann Tarca
Mary Tokar
IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to Illustrative Examples on IFRS 17
Paragraph IE3A is added. New text is underlined.
Introduction
...
IE3A In June 2020, the International Accounting Standards Board (Board) amended
IFRS 17 and made the following amendments to these examples:
(a) Example 12C was added;
(b) Examples 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16 were amended; and
(c) some amendments were made to improve the explanations in

Examples 2B, 3B, 6, 8 and 9.
Footnote (b) to the table after paragraph IE28 is amended. New text is underlined and
Example 2B—Changes in fulfilment cash flows that create

an onerous group of insurance contracts
...
IE28 ...
...
(b) This example illustrates the amounts recognised in the statement of profit or
loss. Example 3B3A illustrates how these amounts could be presented.
The table after paragraph IE40 and the related footnote are amended. New text is
Example 3B—Changes in fulfilment cash flows that create

an onerous group of insurance contracts
...
IE40 ...
Liability for Loss component Liability for Insurance

remaining of the liability for incurred contract
coverage, remaining claims liability
excluding loss coverage
component
CU CU CU CU
Opening balance 404 113 – 517
Insurance finance expenses 16 5 (b) – 21 (d)
Insurance revenue (320) (a) – – (320)
Insurance service expenses – (118) (b) 350 (c) 232
Investment component (100) – 100 –
Insurance finance expenses 16 5 (b) – 21 (d)
Cash flows – – (450) (450)
Closing balance – – – –
(a) ...
(b) Applying paragraph 50(a), the entity allocates on a systematic basis the
subsequent changes in the fulfilment cash flows of the liability for remaining
coverage between the loss component of the liability for remaining coverage and
the liability for remaining coverage, excluding the loss component. In this
example the allocation is based on the 22 per cent proportion of the loss
component of the liability for remaining coverage of CU113 to the total liability
for remaining coverage of CU517 (CU404 + CU113). Consequently, the entity
allocates subsequent changes in fulfilment cash flows to the loss component of
the liability for remaining coverage as follows:
continued...
IFRS STANDARD
...continued
(i) insurance finance expenses of CU5 are determined by multiplying the

total insurance finance expenses of CU21 by 22 per cent. The allocation
is based on the 22 per cent proportion of the loss component of the
liability for remaining coverage of CU113 to the total liability for
remaining coverage of CU517 (CU404 + CU113).
(ii)(i) the change of the loss component of CU118 is the sum of:
1 the estimates of the future cash flows released from the liability
for remaining coverage for the year of CU94CU99, calculated by
multiplying the expected insurance service expenses for the
incurred claims for the year of CU350 by 27 per centplus the
investment component of CU450 (CU350 + CU100) by 22 per cent;
and
2 the change in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk caused

by the release from risk of CU24CU19, calculated by multiplying
the total such change of CU88 by 2722 per cent.
The allocation of the amounts described in 1 and 2 to the loss component

of CU118 is determined after the insurance finance expenses and
investment component have been allocated. The insurance finance
expenses are allocated as described in (i). The investment component is
allocated solely to the liability for remaining coverage excluding the loss
component, because it is not included in insurance revenue or insurance
service expenses. After those allocations, the loss component of the
liability for remaining coverage is CU118 (CU113 + CU5) and the liability
for remaining coverage excluding the investment component is CU438
(CU517 + CU21 – CU100). Hence, the allocations in (ii) are determined as
the ratio of CU118 to CU438, which is 27 per cent.
(ii) the insurance finance expenses of CU5 is determined by multiplying the

total insurance finance expenses of CU21 by 22 per cent.
See Example 8 for a more detailed calculation of losses in a group of insurance

contracts subsequent to initial recognition.
...
Paragraph IE50 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Example 4—Separating components from a life insurance

contract with an account balance
...
Separating the asset management component

IE50 The asset management activities, similarsimilarly to claims processing
activities, are part of the activities the entity must undertake to fulfil the
contract, and the entity does not transfer a good or service other than
insurance contract services to the policyholder because the entity performs
those activities. Thus, applying paragraph B33, the entity would not separate
the asset management component from the insurance contract.
The title of Example 6, paragraphs IE58 and IE62 and the tables after paragraphs IE70
and IE71 and the related footnotes are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text
is struck through.
Example 6—Additional features of the contractual service

margin (paragraphs 44, 87, 101, B96–B99 and B119–
B119B)
...
IE58 The contracts in this example:
(a) ...
(b) do not meet the criteria for insurance contracts with direct
participation features applying paragraph B101(a) because a pool of
assets is not specified in the contracts.
(c) provide an investment-return service applying paragraph B119B.
(d) provide both insurance coverage and investment-return service evenly

over the coverage period of three years.
...
IE62 On initial recognition of the group of contracts, the entity:
...
(d) estimates the risk adjustment for non-financial risk to be CU30 and
expects to recognise it in profit or loss evenly over the coverage period.
Applying paragraph 81, the entity does not disaggregate the changes in
the risk adjustment for non-financial risk between the insurance
service result and insurance finance income or expenses.
...
IFRS STANDARD
IE70 ...
Changes in the estimates of future cash flows in Year 2 Estimates of Estimates of the
future cash flows present value of
future cash
flows(a)
CU CU
Beginning of Year 2 (present value discounted at 10% for
(a)(b) (b)
2 years) 3,414 2,824
The effect of changes in financial assumptions (and interest
accretion) (186) (c) 195193 (d)
RevisedEnd of Year 2, revised for changes in financial

(a)(b) (b)
assumptions (present value discounted at 7% for 1 year) 3,228 3,0193,017
The effect of the exercise of discretion (present value
discounted at 7% for 1 year) 61 (e) 57
Revised in Year 2 for changes in financial assumptions and
the exercise of discretion (present value discounted at 7% (a)(b) (b)
for 1 year) 3,289 3,0763,074
Payment of cash flows (32) (a)(b) (32)
End of Year 2 3,257 3,0443,042
(a) See the table after paragraph IE69.The entity calculates the estimates of the
present value of the future cash outflows using a current discount rate that
reflects the characteristics of the future cash flows, determined applying
paragraphs 36 and B72(a).
(b) The entity calculates the estimates of the present value of the future cash
outflows using a current discount rate that reflects the characteristics of the
future cash flows, determined applying paragraphs 36 and B72(a). All the cash
flows—other than the death benefit payable at the end of Year 2—are payable at
the end of Year 3.See the table after paragraph IE69.
(c) ...
(d) The change in estimates of the present value of the future cash flows of
CU195CU193 is the difference between the estimates of the present value of the
future cash flows at the end of Year 2 (revised for changes in financial
assumptions) of CU3,019CU3,017 and the estimates of the present value of the
future cash flows at the beginning of Year 2 (before changes in financial
assumptions) of CU2,824. Hence, it reflects the effect of the interest accretion
during Year 2 and the effect of the change in financial assumptions.
(e) ...
IE71 ...
Estimates of the Risk adjustment Contractual Insurance

present value of for non-financial service contract
future cash flows risk margin liability
CU CU CU CU
Opening balance 2,824 20 258 3,102
Insurance finance expenses 197195 (a) – 10 (b) 207205

Changes related to future
service: exercise of
discretion 55 (c) – (55) (c) –
Changes related to current
service – (10) (107) (d) (117)
Cash outflows (32) – – (32)
Closing balance 3,0443,042 10 106 3,1603,158
(a) Applying paragraph B97, the entity does not adjust the contractual service
margin for a group of contracts for changes in fulfilment cash flows related to
the effect of the time value of money and financial risk and changes therein,
comprising (being(i) the effect, if any, on estimated future cash flows; (ii) the
effect, if disaggregated, on the risk adjustment for non-financial risk; and (iii)
the effect of a change in discount rate). This is because such changes do not
relate to future service. Applying paragraph 87, the entity recognises those
changes as insurance finance expenses. Consequently, the insurance finance
expenses of CU197CU195 are the sum of:
(i) the effect of interest accretion and the effect of the change in financial
assumptions of CU195CU193 (see the table after paragraph IE70IE69);
and
(ii) ...
...
Paragraph IE76 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Example 7—Insurance acquisition cash flows

(paragraphs 106, B65(e) and B125)
...
IE76 In this example for simplicity, it is assumed that:
...
(c) there is no investment component; and
IFRS STANDARD
(d) the insurance acquisition cash flows directly attributable to the

portfolio to which the contracts belong of CU90 are directly
attributable to the group of contracts to which the contracts belong
and no renewals of those contracts are expected; and
(e)(d) all other amounts, including the effect of discounting, are ignored for
simplicity.
Paragraph IE82 and the tables after paragraphs IE94–IE98 and the related footnotes are
Example 8—Reversal of losses in an onerous group of

insurance contracts (paragraphs 49–50 and B123–B124)
...
IE82 An entity issues 100 insurance contracts with a coverage period of three years.
The coverage period starts when the insurance contracts are issued and the
services are provided evenly over the coverage period. It is assumed, for
simplicity, that no contracts will lapse before the end of the coverage period.
...
IE94 ...

CU CU CU CU
Insurance finance expenses 37 (a) – – 37

Changes related to future
service (286) (b) – 103 (b) (183)
(c)
service – (80) (52)– (132)(80)
Closing balance 94 80 51103 225277
...
(c) Applying paragraph B119(b), the entity allocates the contractual service margin
at the end of the period (before recognising any amounts in profit or loss)
equally to each coverage unit provided in the current period and expected to be
provided in the future. Applying paragraph B119(c), the entity recognises in
profit or loss the amount allocated to coverage units provided in the period of
CU52, which is CU103 divided by two years.
IE95 ...

component
CU CU CU CU
Insurance finance expenses 22 15 (a) – 37 (b)
Insurance revenue (341)(289) (a) – – (341)(289)

Insurance service expenses:
incurred expenses – (191) (a) 400 209
Insurance service expenses:
reversal of loss on onerous
contracts – (183) (c) – (183)
Cash flows – – (400) (400)
Closing balance 225277 – – 225277
...
IE96 ...
Liability for Loss component Total

remaining of the liability for
coverage, remaining
component
CU CU CU
Release of expected insurance service
expenses for the incurred claims for the year (241) (159) (a) (400)
Change in the risk adjustment for non-financial
risk caused by the release from risk (48) (32) (a) (80)
Contractual service margin recognised in profit
or loss for the year (52) – (52)
Insurance revenue (341)(289) (b) –
Insurance service expenses – (191)
Insurance finance expenses 22 (b) (15) (a)
(a) ...
continued...
IFRS STANDARD
...continued
(b) Insurance revenue of CU341CU289 is:
(i) determined by the entity applying paragraph B123 as the difference

between the opening and closing carrying amounts of the liability for
remaining coverage, excluding changes related to the loss component
of CU319 (CU544 – CU225)CU267 (CU544 – CU277), further excluding
insurance finance expenses of CU22, ie CU341 = CU319 + CU22CU289 =
CU267 + CU22; and
(ii) analysed by the entity applying paragraph B124 as the sum of the
insurance service expenses for the incurred claims for the year of
CU400, and the change in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk
caused by the release from risk of CU80 and the amount of the
contractual service margin recognised in profit or loss in the period of
CU52 minus the reversal of the loss component of the liability for
remaining coverage of CU191 (CU159 + CU32), ie CU341CU289 = CU400 +
CU80 + CU52 – CU191.
IE97 ...

CU CU CU CU
Opening balance 94 80 51103 225277
Insurance finance expenses 5 (a) – 35 (b) 810

service – (80) (54)(108) (c) (134)(188)
Rounding difference 1 – – 1
(a) ...
(b) Applying paragraph 44(b), the entity calculates interest accreted on the carrying
amount of the contractual service margin of CU3CU5 by multiplying the
opening balance of CU51CU103 by the discount rate of 5 per cent determined
applying paragraphs 44(b) and B72(b).
(c) ...
IE98 ...

component
CU CU CU CU
Opening balance 225277 – – 225277
Insurance revenue (233)(287) (a) – – (233)(287)
Insurance service expenses – – 100 100
Insurance finance expenses 810 (b) – – 810
Cash flows – – (100) (100)
(a) Insurance revenue of CU233CU287 is:
(i) determined by the entity applying paragraph B123 as the difference

between the opening and closing carrying amounts of the liability for
remaining coverage, excluding changes related to the loss component of
CU225 (CU225–CU0)CU277 (CU277– CU0), further excluding insurance
finance expenses of CU8CU10, ie CU233 = CU225 + CU8CU287 = CU277 +
CU10; and
(ii) analysed by the entity applying paragraph B124 as the sum of the
insurance service expenses of CU100, the change in the risk adjustment
for non-financial risk caused by the release from risk of CU80 and the
contractual service margin recognised in profit or loss of CU54CU108, ie
CU233CU287 = CU100 + CU80 + CU54CU108 – CU1 rounding difference.
(b) ...
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraph IE99 is moved to after the title of Example 9. Paragraphs IE104 and IE105, and
footnote (a) to the table after paragraph IE111 are amended. New text is underlined and
Measurement of groups of insurance contracts with direct

participation features
IE99 This example illustrates the measurement of groups of insurance contracts
with direct participation features.
Example 9—Measurement on initial recognition and

subsequently of groups of insurance contracts with
direct participation features (paragraphs 45 and
B110–B114)
IE99 This example illustrates the measurement of groups of insurance contracts
with direct participation features.
...
IE104 On initial recognition of the contracts, the entity:
...
(c) estimates the risk adjustment for non-financial risk to be CU25 and
expects to recognise it in profit or loss in Years 1–3 as follows: CU12,
CU8 and CU5; and
(d) estimates the time value of the guarantee inherent in providing a

minimum death benefit;1 and
(e)(d) expects that one insured person will die at the end of each year and
claims will be settled immediately.
IE105 During the coverage period, there are changes in the time value of the
guarantee and changes in the fair value returns on underlying items, as
follows:
...
IE111 ...
...
(a) Applying paragraphs B110–B113, the entity adjusts the contractual service
margin for the net of changes in:
(i) the amount of the entity’s share ofin the fair value of the underlying
items; and
...
1 There is no prescribed method for the calculation of the time value of a guarantee, and a
calculation of an amount separate from the rest of the fulfilment cash flows is not required.
The title of Example 11 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Example 11—Measurement on initial recognition of

groups of reinsurance contracts held (paragraphs 63–
65A65)
...
The title of Example 12 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Examples 12A and 12BExample 12—Measurement

subsequent to initial recognition of groups of reinsurance
contracts held (paragraph 66)
...
Paragraphs IE138A‒IE138O and their related headings are added. For ease of reading,
this new example is not underlined.
Example 12C—Measurement of a group of reinsurance

contracts held that provides coverage for groups of
underlying insurance contracts, including an onerous
group (paragraphs 66A–66B and B119C–B119F)
IE138A This example illustrates the initial and subsequent measurement of
reinsurance contracts held when one of the groups of underlying insurance
contracts is onerous.
Assumptions
IE138B At the beginning of Year 1, an entity enters into a reinsurance contract that in
return for a fixed premium covers 30 per cent of each claim from the groups
of underlying insurance contracts. The underlying insurance contracts are
issued at the same time as the entity enters into the reinsurance contract.
IE138C In this example for simplicity it is assumed:
(a) no contracts will lapse before the end of the coverage period;
(b) there are no changes in estimates other than that described in

paragraph IE138J; and
(c) all other amounts, including the effect of discounting, the risk
adjustments for non-financial risk, and the risk of non-performance of
the reinsurer are ignored.
IE138D Some of the underlying insurance contracts are onerous on initial recognition.
Thus, applying paragraph 16, the entity establishes a group comprising the
onerous contracts. The remainder of the underlying insurance contracts are
expected to be profitable and, applying paragraph 16, in this example the
entity establishes a single group comprising the profitable contracts.
IFRS STANDARD
IE138E The coverage period of the underlying insurance contracts and the
reinsurance contract held is three years starting from the beginning of Year 1.
Services are provided evenly across the coverage periods.
IE138F The entity expects to receive premiums of CU1,110 on the underlying

insurance contracts immediately after initial recognition. Claims on the
underlying insurance contracts are expected to be incurred evenly across the
coverage period and are paid immediately after the claims are incurred.
IE138G The entity measures the groups of underlying insurance contracts on initial
recognition as follows:
Profitable group Onerous group of Total

of insurance insurance
contracts contracts
CU CU CU
Estimates of present value of future cash
inflows (900) (210) (1,110)
outflows 600 300 900
Fulfilment cash flows (300) 90 (210)
Contractual service margin 300 – 300

Insurance contract liability on initial
recognition – 90 90
Loss on initial recognition – (90) (90)
IE138H Applying paragraph 61, the entity establishes a group comprising a single
reinsurance contract held. The entity pays a premium of CU315 to the
reinsurer immediately after initial recognition. The entity expects to receive
recoveries of claims from the reinsurer on the same day that the entity pays
claims on the underlying insurance contracts.
IE138I Applying paragraph 63, the entity measures the estimates of the present value
of the future cash flows for the group of reinsurance contracts held using
assumptions consistent with those used to measure the estimates of the
present value of the future cash flows for the groups of underlying insurance
contracts. Consequently, the estimate of the present value of the future cash
inflows is CU270 (recovery of 30 per cent of the estimates of the present value
of the future cash outflows for the groups of underlying insurance contracts
of CU900).
IE138J At the end of Year 2, the entity revises its estimates of the remaining
fulfilment cash outflows of the groups of underlying insurance contracts. The
entity estimates that the fulfilment cash flows of the groups of underlying
insurance contracts increase by 10 per cent, from future cash outflows of
CU300 to future cash outflows of CU330. Consequently, the entity estimates
the fulfilment cash flows of the reinsurance contract held also increase, from
future cash inflows of CU90 to future cash inflows of CU99.
Analysis
IE138K The entity measures the group of reinsurance contracts held on initial
recognition as follows:
Initial
recognition
CU
Estimates of present value of future cash inflows (recoveries) (270)
Estimates of present value of future cash outflows (premiums) 315
Fulfilment cash flows 45

Contractual service margin of the reinsurance contract held (before the loss-recovery
adjustment) (45)
Loss-recovery component (27) (a)
Contractual service margin of the reinsurance contract held (after the loss-recovery
adjustment) (72) (b)
Reinsurance contract asset on initial recognition (27) (c)
Income on initial recognition 27 (a)
(a) Applying paragraph 66A, the entity adjusts the contractual service margin of the
reinsurance contract held and recognises income to reflect the loss recovery.
Applying paragraph B119D, the entity determines the adjustment to the
contractual service margin and the income recognised as CU27 (the loss of CU90
recognised for the onerous group of underlying insurance contracts multiplied
by 30 per cent, the percentage of claims the entity expects to recover).
(b) The contractual service margin of CU45 is adjusted by CU27, resulting in a

contractual service margin of CU72, reflecting a net cost on the reinsurance
contract held.
(c) The reinsurance contract asset of CU27 comprises the fulfilment cash flows of
CU45 (net outflows) and a contractual service margin reflecting a net cost of
CU72. Applying paragraph 66B, the entity establishes a loss-recovery component
of the asset for remaining coverage of CU27 depicting the recovery of losses
recognised applying paragraph 66A.
IFRS STANDARD
IE138L At the end of Year 1, the entity measures the insurance contract liability and
the reinsurance contract asset as follows:
Insurance contract liability Reinsurance

contract asset
Profitable group Onerous group of
contracts contracts
CU CU CU
inflows (recoveries) – – (180)
outflows (claims) 400 200 –
Fulfilment cash flows 400 200 (180)

(a)
Contractual service margin 200 – (48)
Insurance contract liability 600 200
Reinsurance contract asset (228)
(a) Applying paragraphs 66(e) and B119, the entity determines the amount of the
contractual service margin recognised in profit or loss for the service received in
Year 1 as CU24, which is calculated by dividing the contractual service margin
on initial recognition of CU72 by the coverage period of three years.
Consequently, the contractual service margin of the reinsurance contract held
at the end of Year 1 of CU48 equals the contractual service margin on initial
recognition of CU72 minus CU24.
IE138M At the end of Year 2, the entity measures the insurance contract liability and
the reinsurance contract asset as follows:
Insurance contract liability Reinsurance

contract asset
Profitable group Onerous group of
contracts contracts
CU CU CU
inflows (recoveries) – – (99) (a)

outflows (claims) 220 (a) 110 (a) –
Fulfilment cash flows 220 110 (99)
Contractual service margin 90 (b) – (21) (e)
Insurance contract liability 310 110
Reinsurance contract asset (120)
Recognition of loss and recovery of loss (10) (c) 3 (d)
continued...
...continued
(a) The entity increases the expected remaining cash outflows of the groups of
underlying insurance contracts by 10 per cent for each group (CU30 in total) and
increases the expected remaining cash inflows of the reinsurance contract held
by 10 per cent of the expected recoveries of CU90 (CU9).
(b) Applying paragraph 44(c), the entity adjusts the carrying amount of the
contractual service margin of CU200 by CU20 for the changes in fulfilment cash
flows relating to future service. Applying paragraph 44(e), the entity also adjusts
the carrying amount of the contractual service margin by CU90 for the amount
recognised as insurance revenue ((CU200 ‒ CU20) ÷ 2). The resulting contractual
service margin at the end of Year 2 is CU90 (CU200 ‒ CU20 ‒ CU90).
(c) Applying paragraph 48, the entity recognises in profit or loss an amount of
CU10 for the changes in the fulfilment cash flows relating to future service of
the onerous group of underlying insurance contracts.
(d) Applying paragraph 66(c)(i), the entity adjusts the contractual service margin of
the reinsurance contract held for the change in fulfilment cash flows that relate
to future service unless the change results from a change in fulfilment cash
flows allocated to a group of underlying insurance contracts that does not adjust
the contractual service margin for that group. Consequently, the entity
recognises the change in the fulfilment cash flows of the reinsurance contract
held of CU9 by:
(i) recognising immediately in profit or loss CU3 of the change in the

fulfilment cash flows of the reinsurance contract held (30 per cent of the
CU10 change in the fulfilment cash flows of the onerous group of
underlying insurance contracts that does not adjust the contractual
service margin of that group); and
(ii) adjusting the contractual service margin of the reinsurance contract held
by CU6 of the change in the fulfilment cash flows (CU9 ‒ CU3).
(e) Consequently, the contractual service margin of the reinsurance contract held
of CU21 equals the contractual service margin at the end of Year 1 of CU48
adjusted by CU6 and by CU21 of the contractual service margin recognised in
profit or loss for the service received in Year 2 (CU21 = (CU48 – CU6) ÷ 2).
IFRS STANDARD
IE138N A possible format of the reconciliation required by paragraph 100 between the
amounts recognised in the statement of financial position and the statement
of profit or loss for Year 2 is as follows:
Asset for Loss-recovery Asset for Reinsurance

remaining component of incurred contract asset
coverage, the asset for claims
excluding loss- remaining
recovery coverage
component
CU CU CU CU
Opening balance (210) (18) (b) – (228)

Allocation of reinsurance
premiums paid(a) 102 (c) – – 102
Amount recovered from the
reinsurer(a) – 6 (d) (90) (84)
Cash flows – – 90 90
Closing balance (108) (12) – (120)
(a) Applying paragraph 86, the entity decides to present separately the amounts
recovered from the reinsurer and an allocation of the premiums paid.
(b) The loss-recovery component of CU18 at the beginning of Year 2 is calculated as

the loss-recovery component of CU27 on initial recognition less the reversal of
the loss-recovery component of CU9 in Year 1.
(c) The allocation of reinsurance premiums paid of CU102 is:
(i) determined applying paragraph B123 as the difference between the

opening and closing carrying amount of the asset for remaining coverage
of CU102, ie CU210 – CU108.
(ii) analysed applying paragraph B124 as the sum of the recoveries for the
incurred claims of the underlying insurance contracts of CU90 less the
reversal of the loss-recovery component of CU9 and the contractual
service margin of the reinsurance contract held recognised in profit or
loss in the period of CU21 (see the table after paragraph IE138M),
ie CU102 = CU90 – CU9 + CU21.
(d) The amount recovered from the reinsurer relating to the loss-recovery
component of CU6 is the net of the reversal of the loss-recovery component of
CU9 and the additional loss-recovery component of CU3. Applying
paragraph 86(ba), amounts recognised relating to the recovery of losses are
treated as amounts recovered from the reinsurer.
IE138O The amounts presented in the statement of profit or loss corresponding to the
amounts analysed in the tables above are:
Statement of profit or loss Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
CU CU CU CU
Insurance revenue 370 360 380 1,110
Insurance service expenses (360) (280) (290) (930)

(b) (d) (f)
Insurance contracts issued total 10 80 90 180
Allocation of reinsurance premiums
paid(a) (105) (102) (108) (315)
Amount recovered from reinsurer(a) 108 84 87 279

(c) (e) (g)
Reinsurance contracts held total 3 (18) (21) (36)
Insurance service result 13 62 69 144
(a) Applying paragraph 86, the entity decides to present separately the amounts
recovered from the reinsurer and an allocation of the premiums paid.
(b) For Year 1, the profit of CU10 from the groups of underlying insurance
contracts is calculated as follows:
(i) insurance revenue of CU370, which is analysed as the sum of the

insurance service expenses from the claims incurred of CU270 (CU300
minus the reversal of the loss component of CU30) and the contractual
service margin of CU100 recognised in profit or loss in the period (CU370
= CU270 + CU100); minus
(ii) insurance service expenses of CU360, which are the sum of the loss
component of the onerous group of CU90 and the claims incurred in the
period of CU300 minus the reversal of the loss component of CU30
(CU360 = CU90 + CU300 – CU30).
(c) For Year 1, the income of CU3 from the reinsurance contract held is the net of:
(i) the allocation of reinsurance premiums paid of CU105, which is the sum
of the recoveries for the incurred claims from the underlying insurance
contracts of CU90 less the reversal of the loss-recovery component of
CU9 and the contractual service margin of the reinsurance contracts
held of CU24 recognised in profit or loss in the period (CU105 = CU90 –
CU9 + CU24); and
(ii) the amounts recovered from the reinsurer of CU108, which are the
income of CU27 on initial recognition and the recoveries for the incurred
claims from the underlying insurance contracts of CU90 minus the
reversal of the loss-recovery component of CU9 (CU108 = CU27 + CU90 –
CU9).
continued...
IFRS STANDARD
...continued
(d) For Year 2, the profit of CU80 from the groups of underlying insurance

= CU270 + CU90); minus
(ii) insurance service expenses of CU280, which are the sum of the increase
in the loss component resulting from the changes in the fulfilment cash
flows of the onerous group of CU10 and the claims incurred of CU300
minus the reversal of the loss component of CU30 (CU280 = CU10 +
CU300 – CU30).
(e) For Year 2, the expense of CU18 from the reinsurance contract held is the net of:
CU9 and the contractual service margin of the reinsurance contract held
of CU21 recognised in profit or loss in the period (CU102 = CU90 – CU9 +
CU21); and
(ii) the amounts recovered from the reinsurer of CU84, which are the sum of
the recoveries for the incurred claims from the underlying insurance
contracts of CU90 minus the reversal of the loss-recovery component of
CU9 and the additional loss-recovery component of CU3 (CU84 = CU90 –
CU9 + CU3).
(f) For Year 3, the profit of CU90 from the groups of underlying insurance

= CU290 + CU90); minus
(ii) insurance service expenses of CU290, which are the claims incurred of
CU330 minus the reversal of the loss component of CU40 (CU290 =
CU330 – CU40).
continued...
...continued
(g) For Year 3, the expense of CU21 from the reinsurance contract held is the net of:
CU12 and the contractual service margin of the reinsurance contracts
held of CU21 recognised in profit or loss in the period (CU108 = CU99 –
CU12 + CU21); and
(ii) the amounts recovered from the reinsurer of CU87, which are the
recoveries for the incurred claims from the underlying insurance
contracts of CU99 minus the reversal of the loss-recovery component of
CU12 (CU87 = CU99 – CU12).
The heading above Example 13 and footnote (b) to the table after paragraph IE145 are
Measurement of insurance contracts acquired (paragraphs 38 and

B94–B95AB95)

insurance contracts acquired in a transfer from another
entity
...
IE145 ...
...
(b) Applying paragraphs 47 and B95AB95, the entity concludes that the group of
insurance contracts is onerous on initial recognition. This is because the total of
the fulfilment cash flows of a net outflow of CU45 and cash flows arising at that
date (proxy for the premiums of net inflow of CU30) is a net outflow of CU15.
The entity recognises a loss in profit or loss for the net outflow of CU15,
resulting in the carrying amount of the liability for the group of CU45 being the
sum of the fulfilment cash flows of CU45 and the contractual service margin of
zero.
(c) ...
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraphs IE146 and IE147 and footnotes (a) and (b) to the table after paragraph IE151

insurance contracts acquired in a business combination
IE146 This example illustrates the initial recognition of a group of insurance
contracts acquired in a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3
Business Combinations.
Assumptions
IE147 An entity acquires insurance contracts as part of a business combination
within the scope of IFRS 3 and it:
(a) determinesestimates that the transaction results in goodwill applying

IFRS 3 Business Combinations.
(b) ...
...
IE151 ...
...
(a) Applying paragraph 38, the entity measures the contractual service margin on
initial recognition of a group of insurance contracts at an amount that results in
no income or expenses arising from the initial recognition of the fulfilment cash
flows and any cash flows arising from the contracts in the group at that date.
On initial recognition, the fulfilment cash flows areis a net inflow (or asset) of
CU10 (proxy for the premiums received of CU30 minus the fulfilment cash flows
of CU20). Consequently, the contractual service margin equals CU10.
(b) Applying paragraphs 38 and 47, the entity recognises the contractual service
margin as zero because the sum of fulfilment cash flows and cash flows at the
date of initial recognition is a net outflow of CU15. Applying
paragraph B95AB95, the entity recognises the excess of CU15 of the fulfilment
cash flows of CU45 over the consideration received of CU30 as part of the
goodwill on the business combination.
...
The table after paragraph IE184 and the related footnote are amended. New text is
Example 16—Amount that eliminates accounting

mismatches with finance income or expenses arising on
underlying items held (paragraphs 89–90 and B134)
...
IE184 ...
Contractual service margin Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
CU CU CU
Opening balance – 61 33
Change related to future service: new contracts 75 – –

Change in the amount of the entity’s share ofin the fair
value of the underlying items(a) 16 5 5
Change related to current service: recognition in profit or
loss for the service provided (30) (b) (33) (38)
Closing balance 61 33 –
(a) Applying paragraph B112, the entity adjusts the contractual service margin for
the change in the amount of the entity’s share of the fair value of the
underlying items because those changes relate to future service. For example, in
Year 1 the change in the amount of the entity’s share of the fair value of the
underlying items of CU16 is 5 per cent of the change in fair value of the
underlying items of CU311 (CU1,811 – CU1,500). This example does not include
cash flows that do not vary based on the returns on underlying items. For more
details about the changes related to future service that adjust the contractual
service margin see Example 10.
(b) ...
IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to Basis for Conclusions on IFRS 17
Paragraphs BC6A–BC6C and the heading above paragraph BC6A are added. For ease of
reading new text is not underlined.
BC6A After IFRS 17 was issued in May 2017, the Board undertook activities to
support entities and monitor their progress in implementing the Standard.
These activities included establishing a Transition Resource Group for IFRS 17
to discuss implementation questions, and meeting with stakeholders affected
by the changes introduced by IFRS 17, including preparers and users of
financial statements, auditors and regulators. These activities helped the
Board to understand the concerns and challenges that arose for some entities
while implementing the Standard. In the light of these activities, the Board
concluded that the costs of proposing targeted amendments to IFRS 17 to
address concerns and challenges could be justified if those amendments would
not change the fundamental principles of the Standard. The Board considered
suggestions to amend the Standard in relation to 25 topics.
BC6B To maintain the benefits of IFRS 17, the Board decided that any amendments
to IFRS 17 must not:
(a) result in a significant loss of useful information for users of financial

statements compared with the information that would have resulted
from applying IFRS 17 as issued in May 2017; or
(b) unduly disrupt implementation already under way.
BC6C The 2019 Exposure Draft Amendments to IFRS 17 set out the targeted
amendments that the Board proposed, considering the criteria described in
paragraph BC6B. The Board received 123 comment letters about the proposed
amendments. Having considered the feedback on the 2019 Exposure Draft, the
Board issued Amendments to IFRS 17 in June 2020.
Paragraph BC10 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Applying generally applicable IFRS Standards

...
BC10 If the Board extended the scope of existing IFRS Standards to include
insurance contracts, an entity would need to:
...
(d) apply the financial instruments Standards to the investment

component. If an entity accounted for the investment components of
an insurance contract in the same way it accounts for other financial
liabilities, it would, consistent with IFRS 17, not recognise principal
deposited as revenue and would account separately for embedded
options and guarantees when so required by IFRS 9. However, it would
also:
...
(iii) recognise, for investment components measured at fair value

through profit or loss, the costs of originating contracts as an
expense when incurred, with no corresponding gain at
inception. For investment components measured at amortised
cost, incremental transaction costs relating to the investment
component would reduce the initial carrying amount of that
liability. The treatment of insurance acquisition cash flows
applying IFRS 17 is discussed in paragraphs BC175–
BC184KBC184.
Fulfilment cash flows (paragraphs 33–37 of IFRS 17)

BC19 The current value of the fulfilment cash flows allocated to a group of
insurance contracts includes:
(a) a current, unbiased estimate of the future cash flows expected to fulfil
the insurance contracts. The estimate of future cash flows reflects the
perspective of the entity, provided that the estimates of any relevant
market variables are consistent with the observable market prices for
those variables (see paragraphs BC147–BC184NBC184).
(b) an adjustment for the time value of money and the financial risks
associated with the future cash flows, to the extent that the financial
risks are not included in the estimate of the future cash flows. For
example, if the cash flows being discounted are an estimate of the
probability-weighted average (the mean), that mean itself does not
include an adjustment for risk, and any financial risk (ie uncertainty
relating to financial risk on whether the ultimate cash flows will equal
the mean) will be included in the discount rate (a risk-adjusted rate). If,
in contrast, the cash flows being discounted are an estimate of the
mean with an adjustment to reflect uncertainty related to financial
risk, the discount rate will be a rate that reflects only the time value of
money (ie not adjusted for risk). The discount rates are consistent with
observable current market prices for instruments whose cash flow
characteristics are consistent with the estimates of the cash flows of
the insurance contracts. The discount rates also exclude the effects of
any factors that influence observable market prices but are not
relevant to the estimates of the cash flows of the insurance contracts
(see paragraphs BC185–BC205BBC205).
...
IFRS STANDARD
A footnote is added to paragraph BC21 after ‘It depicts the profit that the entity expects to
earn by providing the services promised under the contracts in the group over the duration
of the coverage of the group.’ For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to recognise an

amount of the contractual service margin in profit or loss in each period to
reflect the insurance contract services provided in that period (see paragraphs
BC283A‒BC283J).
Subsequent measurement and recognition of profit (paragraphs

40–46 of IFRS 17)
...
BC23 After initial recognition, IFRS 17 also requires an entity to recognise specified
changes in the contractual service margin for a group of insurance contracts.
These changes depict changes in the future profit to be earned from providing
services under the contracts, and include:
(a) changes in the estimates of the fulfilment cash flows that relate to
future service (see paragraphs BC222–BC269CBC269);
(b) the effect of the time value of money on the contractual service
margin (see paragraphs BC270–BC276EBC276) and, for insurance
contracts with direct participation features, changes in the entity’s
share of the underlying items (see paragraphs BC238–BC263);
(c) ...
(d) the profit earned in the period from providing services (see paragraphs
BC279–BC283JBC283).
...
A footnote is added to the end of paragraph BC25(a). For ease of reading new text is not
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended the definition of a liability for remaining
coverage to include amounts for which an entity will provide investment-
return service or investment-related service (see paragraphs BC283A‒BC283J).
A footnote is added to the end of the first sentence of paragraph BC33. For ease of
* In June 2020, the Board amended the definition of an investment component

to clarify that an investment component is the amounts that an insurance
contract requires the entity to repay to a policyholder in all circumstances,
regardless of whether an insured event occurs (see paragraph BC34A).
A footnote is added to the end of paragraph BC33. For ease of reading new text is not
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph B123 of IFRS 17 to clarify that
changes caused by cash flows from loans to policyholders do not give rise to
insurance revenue. This treatment is similar to the treatment of investment
components.
Paragraph BC34A and the heading above that paragraph are added. For ease of reading
new text is not underlined.
Amendments to IFRS 17—definition of an investment component

BC34A In June 2020, the Board amended the definition of an investment component
regardless of whether an insured event occurs (see paragraph BC34). A
discussion at a meeting of the Transition Resource Group for IFRS 17
suggested that the wording of the definition before the amendment did not
capture fully the explanation in paragraph BC34.
Presentation of insurance finance income or expenses

(paragraphs 87–92 and B128–B136 of IFRS 17)
...
BC45 Alternative approaches to the presentation of insurance finance income or

expenses considered but rejected by the Board are discussed in paragraphs
BC340–BC342CBC342.
The level of aggregation

...
BC52 In reaching a decision on the level of aggregation, the Board balanced the loss
of information inevitably caused by the aggregation of contracts with the
usefulness of the resulting information in depicting the financial performance
of an entity’s insurance activities and with the operational burden of
collecting the information (see paragraphs BC115–BC139TBC139).
IFRS STANDARD
Paragraphs BC55‒BC56 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Accounting mismatches
...
BC55 The Board’s decisions on risk mitigation techniques related to insurance

contracts with direct participation features reduce the accounting mismatches
that were introduced by the variable fee approach by providing an option to
align the overall effect of the variable fee approach more closely to the model
for other insurance contracts (see paragraphs BC250–BC256HBC256).
However, the Board concluded that it would not be appropriate to develop a
bespoke solution for all hedging activities for insurance contracts, noting that
such a solution should form part of a broader project. The Board did not want
to delay the publication of IFRS 17 pending finalisation of that broader
project. The Board also concluded that a prospective basis was necessary for
the application of the risk mitigation requirements on transition, for the
reasons set out in paragraph BC393.
BC56 Insurance contracts with direct participation features are measured by

reference to the fair value of the underlying items (see paragraphs BC238–
BC249DBC249). This measurement reflects the investment-related nature of
the contracts. Applying IFRS Standards, many underlying items will also be
measured at fair value. The Board also decided to amend some IFRS Standards
to enable additional underlying items to be measured at fair value (see
paragraph BC65(c)). However, there could still be underlying items that cannot
be measured at fair value applying IFRS Standards; for example, other
insurance contracts or net assets of a subsidiary. The Board noted that all such
mismatches would be eliminated only if all assets and liabilities were
recognised and measured at fair value.
The heading above paragraph BC63 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text
is struck through.
Scope of the Standard and definition of insurance contracts

(paragraphs 3–8A8 and B2–B30 of IFRS 17)
...
Paragraphs BC87‒BC88 and the heading above paragraph BC87 are amended. New text
is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
Scope exclusions (paragraphs 7–8A8 of IFRS 17)

BC87 The scope of IFRS 17 excludes various items that may meet the definition of
insurance contracts, such as:
...
(h) some credit card contracts and similar contracts that provide credit or
payment arrangements (see paragraphs BC94A‒BC94C).
BC88 IFRS 17 also allows an entity a choice of applying IFRS 17 or another IFRS
Standard to some contracts, specifically:
(a) applying IFRS 17 or IFRS 15 to some fixed-fee service contracts (see

paragraphs BC95–BC97); and.
(b) applying IFRS 17 or IFRS 9 to specified contracts such as loan contracts

with death waivers (see paragraphs BC94D‒BC94F).
Paragraphs BC94A‒BC94F and the headings above paragraphs BC94A and BC94D are
added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Amendments to IFRS 17—scope exclusions
Credit card contracts and similar contracts that provide credit or

payment arrangements (paragraph 7(h) of IFRS 17)
BC94A Some contracts that provide credit or payment arrangements meet the
definition of an insurance contract—for example, some credit card contracts,
charge card contracts, consumer financing contracts or bank account
contracts. In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to exclude from the scope
of the Standard such contracts if, and only if, an entity does not reflect an
assessment of the insurance risk associated with an individual customer in
setting the price of the contract with that customer. When the entity does not
reflect such an assessment in the price of the contract, the Board concluded
that IFRS 9 would provide more useful information about those contracts
than would IFRS 17.
BC94B The Board was aware that, applying IFRS 4, most entities separated the
components of such contracts. For example, an entity applying IFRS 4 might
have accounted for the credit card component applying IFRS 9, the insurance
component applying IFRS 4 and any other service components applying
IFRS 15. IFRS 17 has different criteria from IFRS 4 for separating components
of an insurance contract. However, the Board acknowledged that entities had
already identified methods to separate the components of the contracts
described in paragraph BC94A, and concluded that prohibiting such
separation would impose costs and disruption for no significant benefit.
BC94C The Board instead decided to specify that an entity’s rights and obligations
that are financial instruments arising under such contracts are within the
scope of IFRS 9. However, an entity is required to separate and apply IFRS 17
to an insurance coverage component if, and only if, that component is a
contractual term of that financial instrument. In the Board’s view, applying
IFRS 17 to those insurance coverage components will result in the most useful
information for users of financial statements. Applying IFRS 17 to those
components will also increase comparability between insurance coverage
provided as part of the contractual terms of a credit card contract and
insurance coverage provided as a separate stand-alone contract. Other IFRS
Standards, such as IFRS 15 or IAS 37, might apply to other components of the
contract, such as other service components or insurance components required
by law or regulation.
IFRS STANDARD
Specified contracts such as loan contracts with death waivers

(paragraph 8A of IFRS 17)
BC94D In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to allow entities to apply either
IFRS 17 or IFRS 9 to contracts that meet the definition of an insurance
contract but limit the compensation for insured events to the amount
otherwise required to settle the policyholder’s obligation created by the
contract (for example, loan contracts with death waivers).
BC94E The Board noted that an entity would provide useful information about such
contracts whether it applied IFRS 17 or IFRS 9. Hence, the Board concluded
that requiring an entity to apply IFRS 17 to those contracts when the entity
had previously been applying an accounting policy consistent with IFRS 9 or
IAS 39 could impose costs and disruption for no significant benefit.
BC94F An entity is required to choose whether to apply IFRS 17 or IFRS 9 for each
portfolio of insurance contracts described in paragraph BC94D, and this choice
is irrevocable. The Board concluded that such restrictions would mitigate the
lack of comparability that might otherwise arise between similar contracts
issued by the same entity.
Separating components from an insurance contract (paragraphs

10–13 and B31–B35 of IFRS 17)
...
A footnote is added to the end of paragraph BC102, to the end of the heading above
paragraph BC110, to paragraph BC110 after ‘non-insurance services’, and to
paragraph BC111 after ‘non-insurance service,’. For ease of reading new text is not
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 and replaced ‘non-insurance

services’ with ‘services other than insurance contract services’ (see paragraphs
BC283A‒BC283J).
A footnote is added to the end of the first sentence in paragraph BC108. For ease of
* In June 2020, the Board amended the definition of an investment component

regardless of whether an insured event occurs (see paragraph BC34A).
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph 11(b) of IFRS 17 to clarify that an
entity applies IFRS 17 to a separated investment component if that component
meets the definition of an investment contract with discretionary
participation features within the scope of IFRS 17.
A footnote is added to paragraph BC110 after ‘insurance coverage,’. For ease of reading
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require entities to separate only
goods and services that are distinct from the provision of insurance contract
services (see paragraphs BC283A‒BC283J).
A footnote is added to paragraph BC122 after ‘profit relating to the coverage’. For ease of

reflect insurance contract services provided in that period (see paragraphs
BC283A‒BC283J).
Paragraphs BC139A‒BC139T and the headings above paragraphs BC139A, BC139F,

BC139I and BC139T are added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on the level of aggregation

BC139A Entities implementing IFRS 17 raised concerns relating to the level of
aggregation requirements. The Board therefore considered whether to amend
the requirements, and if so, how (see paragraph BC139B). Having considered a
number of possible amendments, the Board reaffirmed its view that the
benefits of the level of aggregation requirements significantly outweigh the
costs. The Board therefore decided to retain the requirements unchanged.
BC139B The Board considered suggestions to:
(a) replace all level of aggregation requirements in paragraphs 14–24 of

IFRS 17 with approaches that reflect an entity’s internal management
(see paragraph BC139C);
(b) reduce the minimum number of groups required by paragraph 16 of

IFRS 17 (profitability groups) from three to two—contracts that are
onerous at initial recognition and contracts that are not onerous at
initial recognition (see paragraph BC139D); and
(c) remove or exempt some groups of insurance contracts from the annual
cohort requirement in paragraph 22 of IFRS 17 (see paragraph BC139E).
BC139C The Board considered but rejected suggestions to replace all level of
aggregation requirements with approaches that reflect an entity’s internal
management, for example approaches based on an entity’s asset and liability
management strategy or risk management strategy. The objective of the level
of aggregation requirements in IFRS 17 is to provide useful information for
users of financial statements. Aspects of internal management such as asset
and liability management strategy or risk management strategy have different
objectives. Hence an approach based on those aspects would not necessarily
achieve the Board’s objective.
IFRS STANDARD
BC139D The Board considered but rejected the suggestion to reduce the minimum
number of profitability groups from three to two (see paragraph BC127) for
the reason set out in paragraph BC130. This suggestion would have removed
the requirement to group separately insurance contracts that at initial
recognition have no significant possibility of becoming onerous from other
insurance contracts that are not onerous at initial recognition. The Board
noted that an entity will generally issue contracts expecting them to be
profitable, and losses will arise subsequently as a result of changes in
expectations. Including all contracts that are profitable at initial recognition
in a single group could significantly delay loss recognition or increase the risk
of losses for onerous contracts never being recognised.
BC139E Some suggestions to remove or exempt some groups of insurance contracts

from the annual cohort requirement related to all insurance contracts issued
(see paragraphs BC139F–BC139H). Other suggestions related to specific types
of insurance contracts—those with intergenerational sharing of risks between
policyholders (see paragraphs BC139I‒BC139S).
Annual cohort requirement—all insurance contracts

BC139F The Board considered but rejected a suggestion to exempt contracts from the
annual cohort requirement if an entity has reasonable and supportable
information to conclude that contracts issued more than one year apart would
be classified in the same profitability group. Such an exemption could result
in a portfolio consisting of only the three groups of contracts described in
paragraph BC127, that would each last for the entire life of the portfolio,
which may be indefinite. The contractual service margin of each group would
average the profitability of all contracts in the group over the life of the
portfolio, resulting in the loss of useful information about trends in
profitability. The contracts placed in any of the three profitability groups
could be significantly more or less profitable than other contracts in the
group. The effect of averaging profits of the contracts in the group could
therefore be substantially increased, leading to a greater likelihood that:
(a) the contractual service margin of a contract would outlast the coverage
period of that contract; and
(b) the continuing profitability of some contracts would absorb the

subsequent adverse changes in expectations that make some contracts
onerous.
BC139G Some stakeholders said that in some circumstances they could achieve at
much less cost the same or a similar outcome without applying the annual
cohort requirement as would be achieved applying that requirement. The
Board concluded that it is unnecessary to amend IFRS 17 to reflect such
circumstances. The Board reaffirmed its view that the requirements specify
the amounts to be reported, not the methodology to be used to arrive at those
amounts (see paragraph BC138). An entity is required to apply judgement and
to consider all possible scenarios for future changes in expectations to
conclude whether it could achieve the same accounting outcome without
applying the annual cohort requirement.
BC139H The Board recognised that entities will incur costs to identify the contractual
service margin for each group of insurance contracts that is an annual cohort.
However, the Board concluded that information about higher or lower profits
earned by an entity from different generations of contracts is sufficiently
useful to justify such costs.
Annual cohort requirement—insurance contracts with intergenerational

sharing of risks between policyholders
BC139I The Board considered but rejected a suggestion to exempt from the annual
cohort requirement insurance contracts with intergenerational sharing of
risks between policyholders. Some stakeholders commented that:
(a) applying the requirement to such contracts requires arbitrary

allocations, and the resulting information is therefore not useful; and
(b) implementing the requirement is particularly costly and complex for

such contracts, and the cost exceeds the resulting benefit.
BC139J Intergenerational sharing of risks between policyholders is reflected in the

fulfilment cash flows and therefore in the contractual service margin of each
generation of contracts applying paragraphs B67−B71 of IFRS 17 (see
paragraph BC171). However, each generation of contracts may be more or less
profitable for an entity than other generations. Applying the variable fee
approach (see paragraphs BC238‒BC249) the profit for a group of insurance
contracts reflects the entity’s share in the fair value returns on underlying
items. The entity’s share in the fair value returns on underlying items is
unaffected by the way the policyholders’ share is distributed among
generations of policyholders. For example, even if all generations of
policyholders share equally in the fair value returns on the same pool of
underlying items, the amount of the entity’s share in those fair value returns
created by each generation may differ. The entity’s share in the fair value
returns depends on the contractual terms of each annual cohort and the
economic conditions during the coverage period of each annual cohort. For
example, a 20 per cent share in fair value returns created by an annual cohort
for which the fair value returns during the coverage period are 5 per cent is
more profitable for an entity than a 20 per cent share in fair value returns
created by an annual cohort for which the fair value returns during the
coverage period are 1 per cent. Removing the annual cohort requirement for
groups of insurance contracts with intergenerational sharing of risks between
policyholders would average higher or lower profits from each generation of
contracts, resulting in a loss of information about changes in profitability over
time.
BC139K Nonetheless, the Board identified two aspects of applying the annual cohort
requirement to some contracts with intergenerational sharing of risks
between policyholders that could increase the costs of applying the
requirement and reduce the benefits of the resulting information:
(a) distinguishing between the effect of risk sharing and the effect of
discretion (paragraph BC139L); and
IFRS STANDARD
(b) allocating changes in the amount of the entity’s share of the fair value
of underlying items between annual cohorts that share in the same
pool of underlying items (paragraph BC139M).
BC139L The aspect set out in paragraph BC139K(a) relates to circumstances in which
an entity has discretion over the portion of the fair value returns on
underlying items that the entity pays to policyholders and the portion that the
entity retains. For example, an entity may be required under the terms of the
insurance contracts to pay policyholders a minimum of 90 per cent of the
total fair value returns on a specified pool of underlying items, but have
discretion to pay more. The Board acknowledged that an entity with such
discretion is required to apply additional judgement compared to an entity
without such discretion to allocate changes in fulfilment cash flows between
groups in a way that appropriately reflects the effect of risk sharing and the
effect of the discretion. However, that judgement is required to measure new
contracts recognised in a period, so would be needed even without the annual
cohort requirement.
BC139M The aspect set out in paragraph BC139K(b) relates to insurance contracts with
direct participation features. For such contracts, an entity adjusts the
contractual service margin for changes in the amount of the entity’s share of
the fair value of underlying items. IFRS 17 does not include specific
requirements for allocating those changes between annual cohorts that share
in the same pool of underlying items. The Board acknowledged that an entity
needs to apply judgement to choose an allocation approach that provides
useful information about the participation of each annual cohort in the
underlying items.
BC139N Nonetheless, in the Board’s view, the information that results from the
judgements an entity makes in determining the allocation approaches
discussed in paragraphs BC139L–BC139M will provide users of financial
statements with useful information about how management expects the
performance of insurance contracts to develop.
BC139O Further, the Board identified specific insurance contracts with

intergenerational sharing of risks for which the information provided by the
annual cohort requirement is particularly useful. Those contracts:
(a) include features such as financial guarantees on the returns on

underlying items or other cash flows that do not vary with returns on
underlying items (for example, insurance claims); and
(b) do not share the changes in the effect of the features in (a) between the
entity and policyholders, or share the changes in the effect between
the entity and policyholders in a way that results in the entity bearing
more than a small share.
BC139P The Board acknowledged that for some insurance contracts with substantial
intergenerational sharing of risks, the effect of financial guarantees and other
cash flows that do not vary with returns on underlying items would rarely
cause an annual cohort to become onerous. However, the Board disagreed
with stakeholders who said that the rarity of such an event makes less useful
the information that results from applying the annual cohort requirement to
such insurance contracts. The Board instead observed the rarity makes the
information particularly useful to users of financial statements when such an
event occurs. The Board identified such information about the effect of
financial guarantees as being particularly important when interest rates are
low.
BC139Q Consequently, the Board concluded the costs of the annual cohort
requirement might exceed the benefits of the resulting information for only a
very limited population of contracts. The population is much smaller than
some stakeholders had suggested.
BC139R Nonetheless, the Board considered whether it could create an exemption from
the annual cohort requirement that would capture only that very limited
population of contracts, without the risk of capturing a wider population.
However:
(a) any focused exemption would be complex because of the interaction

between contract features that increase the costs and reduce the
benefits. An exemption would therefore result in difficulties for
entities and auditors in identifying which contracts would be
exempted, and for users of financial statements in understanding
which contracts had been exempted. A significant difference in
outcomes could arise in some circumstances depending on whether
the annual cohort requirement has been applied, and thus it would be
essential that the scope of an exemption from that requirement is
clear to understand.
(b) the purpose of any exemption would be to balance the costs and
benefits. However, there is no way to specify the scope of the
exemption other than by using arbitrary thresholds because the
balance of costs and benefits for different contracts vary across a range
and there is no clearly identifiable point at which the costs exceed the
benefits. Entities would be able to avoid applying the annual cohort
requirement by structuring contracts to meet those thresholds. The
Board concluded there was a high risk that contracts for which the
benefits of the annual cohort requirement heavily outweigh the costs
would be included in the exemption, resulting in a loss of information
critical for users of financial statements.
BC139S The Board concluded that for all but a very limited population of contracts
there is no question that the benefits of the annual cohort requirement
significantly outweigh the costs. For a very limited population of contracts the
costs and benefits of the requirement are more finely balanced. However, it is
not possible to define that population in a way that does not risk it becoming
too broad. The Board therefore decided to retain the annual cohort
requirement unchanged.
IFRS STANDARD
Annual cohort requirement—group based on issue date

BC139T In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph 28 of IFRS 17 to clarify that an
entity is required to add an insurance contract to a group of insurance
contracts at the date the contract is recognised, instead of the date the
contract is issued (see paragraph BC145A). The Board considered but rejected a
suggestion to also amend the annual cohort requirement in paragraph 22 of
IFRS 17 to base it on the date contracts are recognised, instead of the date they
are issued. The objective of the annual cohort requirement is to facilitate
timely recognition of profits, losses and trends in profitability. The
profitability of a contract is initially set when the contract is issued, based on
facts and circumstances at that date—for example, interest rates,
underwriting expectations and pricing. Hence, the Board concluded that
determining annual cohorts based on the date that contracts are issued is
necessary to provide useful information about trends in profitability.
is struck through.
Recognition (paragraphs 25–28F28 of IFRS 17)

...
A footnote is added to the end of the first sentence of paragraph BC144. For ease of
* In June 2020, the Board amended the definition of a coverage period to be the
period during which the entity provides insurance contract services (see
paragraphs BC283A‒BC283I).
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended the requirements relating to assets for
insurance acquisition cash flows (see paragraphs BC184A‒BC184K). The Board
also specified that an entity recognises an asset for insurance acquisition cash
flows paid (or for which a liability has been recognised applying another IFRS
Standard) (see paragraphs BC184L‒BC184N).
Paragraph BC145A and the heading above that paragraph are added. For ease of reading
Amendments to IFRS 17—recognition

BC145A In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph 28 of IFRS 17 to clarify that an
entity is required to add an insurance contract to a group of insurance
contracts (that is, to recognise an insurance contract) at the date the insurance
contract meets any one of the recognition criteria in paragraph 25 of IFRS 17
(see paragraph BC142). That date may differ from the date on which the
insurance contract is issued—for example, it may be the date that premiums
become due.
Measurement of fulfilment cash flows (paragraphs 29–37 and

B36–B92 of IFRS 17)
BC146 As explained in paragraphs BC19–BC20, IFRS 17 requires an entity to measure
the fulfilment cash flows at a risk-adjusted present value. The sections below
discuss the measurement of the fulfilment cash flows, in particular:
(a) ...
(b) which cash flows should be included in the expected value of cash
flows (see paragraphs BC158–BC184NBC184);
(c) how the cash flows are adjusted to reflect the time value of money and
the financial risks, to the extent that the financial risks are not
included in the estimates of future cash flows (see paragraphs BC185–
BC205BBC205); and
(d) ...
Unbiased use of all reasonable and supportable information

available without undue cost or effort (paragraphs 33(a) and
...
BC150 In principle, determining an expected present value involves the following

steps:
(a) ...
(b) measuring the present value of the cash flows in that scenario—
paragraphs BC185–BC205BBC205 discuss the discount rate; and
...
Paragraph BC158 is amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is stuck through.
The cash flows used to measure insurance contracts

(paragraphs 34–35 and B61–B71 of IFRS 17)
BC158 This section discusses which cash flows should be included in the expected
value of cash flows, including:
...
(ca) cash flows relating to policyholder taxes (see paragraph BC170A);
(d) cash flows that affect or are affected by cash flows to policyholders of
other contracts (see paragraphs BC171–BC174); and
(e) insurance acquisition cash flows (see paragraphs BC175–

BC184KBC184).; and
IFRS STANDARD
(f) pre-recognition cash flows other than insurance acquisition cash flows
(see paragraphs BC184L–BC184N).
A footnote is added to the end of paragraphs BC160(a), BC162(a), BC162(b) and BC163.
For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
paragraphs BC283A‒BC283J).
Paragraph BC170A and the heading above paragraph BC170A are added. For ease of
Amendments to IFRS 17—cash flows relating to policyholder taxes

(paragraphs B65‒B66 of IFRS 17)
BC170A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to resolve an inconsistency between
the description of cash flows within the boundary of an insurance contract in
paragraph B65(m) of IFRS 17 and the description of cash flows outside the
boundary of an insurance contract in paragraph B66(f) of IFRS 17. Before the
amendment, paragraph B66(f) of IFRS 17 required an entity to exclude income
tax payments and receipts not paid or received in a fiduciary capacity from
the estimate of the cash flows that will arise as the entity fulfils an insurance
contract. Some stakeholders said that some income tax payments and receipts,
although not paid or received in a fiduciary capacity, are costs specifically
chargeable to the policyholder under the terms of the contract. Accordingly,
those costs should be included in the boundary of an insurance contract
applying paragraph B65(m) of IFRS 17. The Board agreed that any costs
specifically chargeable to the policyholder are cash flows that will arise as the
entity fulfils an insurance contract. Therefore, the Board amended
paragraph B66(f) of IFRS 17 to avoid excluding from the fulfilment cash flows
income tax payments or receipts specifically chargeable to the policyholder
under the terms of the contract. An entity recognises insurance revenue for
the consideration paid by the policyholder for such income tax amounts when
the entity recognises in profit or loss the income tax amounts. This treatment
is consistent with the recognition of insurance revenue for other incurred
expenses applying IFRS 17 (see paragraph BC37).
underlined.
* When developing the June 2020 amendments to IFRS 17, the Board considered
but rejected suggestions to exempt from the annual cohort requirement
insurance contracts with intergenerational sharing of risks (see paragraphs
BC139I‒BC139S). These considerations were similar to those in developing the
Standard as described in paragraph BC174.
A footnote is added to paragraph BC176 after ‘future cash flows that are included in the
measurement of the contract.’ For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
* An asset for insurance acquisition cash flows is derecognised when those

insurance acquisition cash flows are included in the measurement of the
group of insurance contracts to which they have been allocated. In June 2020,
the Board amended IFRS 17 so that allocation reflects an entity’s expectations
about future contract renewals (see paragraphs BC184A‒BC184K).
A footnote is added to paragraph BC177 after ‘(including amounts received or to be

received by the entity to acquire new insurance contracts).’. For ease of reading new text
is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to clarify that insurance acquisition
cash flows paid before a group of insurance contracts is recognised cannot be
a liability.
A footnote is added to the end of paragraphs BC180 and BC184. For ease of reading new
text is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to include specific requirements

relating to an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows recognised before a
group of insurance contracts is recognised (see paragraphs BC184A‒BC184K).
Paragraphs BC184A‒BC184K and the heading above paragraph BC184A are added. For
ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Amendments to IFRS 17—insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraphs

28A‒28F and B35A‒B35D of IFRS 17)
BC184A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to use a
systematic and rational method to allocate insurance acquisition cash flows
that are directly attributable to a group of insurance contracts:
(a) to that group; and
(b) to groups that will include insurance contracts that are expected to
arise from renewals of insurance contracts in that group (see
paragraph B35A of IFRS 17).
BC184B Before the amendment, an entity was required to allocate insurance

acquisition cash flows directly attributable to a group to only that group. In
contrast, insurance acquisition cash flows directly attributable to a portfolio
of insurance contracts but not directly attributable to a group of insurance
contracts are systematically and rationally allocated to groups of insurance
contracts in the portfolio.
BC184C Stakeholders said an entity that issues an insurance contract with a short
coverage period, such as one year, might incur high up-front costs, such as
commissions to sales agents, relative to the premium the entity will charge for
the contract. The entity agrees to those costs because it expects that some
policyholders will renew their contracts. Often, those costs are fully directly
IFRS STANDARD
attributable to the initial insurance contract issued because those costs are
non-refundable and are not contingent on the policyholder renewing the
contracts.
BC184D In some circumstances, such commissions are higher than the premium
charged and applying IFRS 17 before it was amended would have resulted in
the initial insurance contract being identified as onerous. In the Board’s view,
an entity recognising a loss in that circumstance would provide useful
information to users of financial statements. The information would reflect
that the entity does not have a right to either oblige policyholders to renew
the contracts, or to reclaim the commissions from sales agents if policyholders
choose not to renew the contracts.
BC184E However, the Board was persuaded that an amendment to IFRS 17 requiring
an entity to allocate insurance acquisition cash flows to expected renewal
contracts (expected renewals) would also provide useful information to users
of financial statements. Such a requirement depicts the payment of up-front
costs such as commissions as an asset that an entity expects to recover
through both initial insurance contracts issued and expected renewals. The
asset reflects the right of an entity to not pay again costs it had already paid to
obtain renewals. The Board noted that the information resulting from the
amendment is comparable to the information provided by IFRS 15 for the
incremental costs of obtaining a contract.
BC184F The Board concluded it did not need to develop requirements to specify how
to allocate insurance acquisition cash flows to expected renewals. It concluded
that requiring a systematic and rational method of allocation, consistent with
paragraph B65(l) of IFRS 17, is sufficient.
BC184G The Board noted that if an entity allocates assets for insurance acquisition
cash flows to groups expected to be recognised across more than one reporting
period in the future, an entity would need to update its allocation at the end
of each reporting period to reflect any changes in assumptions about expected
renewals. The Board also decided to clarify that an entity must apply a
consistent method across reporting periods by referring in the requirements
to a systematic and rational method (rather than a systematic and rational
basis).
BC184H Amending IFRS 17 to require an entity to allocate insurance acquisition cash

flows to expected renewals creates assets for insurance acquisition cash flows
that will be recognised for longer than assets would have been recognised
applying the requirements before the amendment. The amendment will
therefore increase the carrying amount of assets for insurance acquisition
cash flows. Accordingly, the Board considered whether it should specify
requirements for:
(a) accretion of interest on assets for insurance acquisition cash flows. The
Board decided against specifying such requirements because doing so
would be inconsistent with IFRS 15.
(b) assessments of the recoverability of assets for insurance acquisition

cash flows. The Board decided to specify such requirements for the
reasons set out in paragraphs BC184I–BC184K.
BC184I When the Board issued IFRS 17 in May 2017, it concluded that requiring an
entity to assess the recoverability of an asset for insurance acquisition cash
flows would be unnecessary. The asset was typically of relatively short
duration and any lack of recoverability would be reflected on a timely basis
when the asset was derecognised and the insurance acquisition cash flows
were included in the measurement of a group of insurance contracts (see
paragraph BC180). As a result of the June 2020 amendment set out in
paragraph BC184A, the Board concluded that it needed to require an entity to
assess the recoverability of an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows at the
end of each reporting period if facts and circumstances indicate the asset may
be impaired.
BC184J Consistent with the impairment test in paragraph 101 of IFRS 15, an entity
recognises an impairment loss in profit or loss and reduces the carrying
amount of an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows so that the carrying
amount does not exceed the expected net cash inflow for the related group.
BC184K The Board noted that an entity measures an asset for insurance acquisition
cash flows at the level of a group of insurance contracts. An impairment test
at a group level compares the carrying amount of an asset for insurance
acquisition cash flows allocated to a group with the expected net cash inflow
of the group. That net cash inflow includes cash flows for contracts unrelated
to any expected renewals but expected to be in that group. The Board
therefore decided to require an additional impairment test specific to cash
flows for expected renewals. This additional impairment test results in the
recognition of any impairment losses when the entity no longer expects the
renewals supporting the asset to occur, or expects the net cash inflows to be
lower than the amount of the asset. Without the additional impairment test,
cash flows from contracts unrelated to any expected renewals might prevent
the recognition of such an impairment loss.
Paragraphs BC184L‒BC184N and the heading above paragraph BC184L are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—pre-recognition cash flows other than

insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraphs 38, B66A and B123A of
IFRS 17)
BC184L In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to address the treatment of assets or
liabilities for cash flows related to a group of insurance contracts that have
been recognised before the group of insurance contracts is recognised. Such
assets and liabilities might have been recognised before the group of
insurance contracts is recognised because the cash flows occur or because a
liability is recognised applying another IFRS Standard. Cash flows are related
to a group of insurance contracts if they would have been included in the
fulfilment cash flows at the date of initial recognition of the group had they
been paid or received after that date.
IFRS STANDARD
BC184M The Board agreed with feedback that such cash flows should be included in
the determination of the contractual service margin and insurance revenue
for the group of insurance contracts. These cash flows should affect profit and
revenue in the same way as the fulfilment cash flows regardless of their
timing (or of the timing of their recognition as a liability).
BC184N The amendment requires an entity to derecognise any asset or liability for
such cash flows when the entity recognises the related group of insurance
contracts to the extent that the asset or liability would not have been
recognised separately from the group of insurance contracts if the cash flows
(or the event that triggered their recognition as a liability) had occurred at the
date of initial recognition of the group of insurance contracts. In addition the
Board concluded that, to be consistent with the recognition of insurance
revenue and incurred expenses required by IFRS 17, to the extent that an asset
is derecognised when the entity recognises the related group of insurance
contracts, insurance revenue and expenses should be recognised. In contrast,
no insurance revenue or expenses arise on the derecognition of a liability at
that date. The derecognition of a liability results either in the amounts
expected to settle the liability being included in the fulfilment cash flows or
the performance obligation depicted by the liability being subsumed within
the recognition of the group of insurance contracts. For example, an entity
that recognised a liability for premiums received in advance of the recognition
of a group of insurance contracts would derecognise that liability when the
entity recognises a group of insurance contracts to the extent the premiums
relate to the contracts in the group. The performance obligation that was
depicted by the liability would not be recognised separately from the group of
insurance contracts had the premiums been received on the date of the initial
recognition of the group. No insurance revenue arises on the derecognition of
the liability.
Discount rates (paragraphs 36 and B72–B85 of IFRS 17)

BC185 This section discusses:
...
(d) disclosure of the yield curve (see paragraph BC198); and
(e) reflecting dependence on underlying items in the discount rate (see

paragraphs BC199–BC205); and.
(f) subjectivity in determining discount rates (see paragraphs BC205A‒

BC205B).
Paragraphs BC205A‒BC205B and the heading above paragraph BC205A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on the subjectivity in

determining discount rates
BC205A When the Board considered feedback from entities implementing IFRS 17, it
also considered feedback from users of financial statements that the principle-
based requirements for determining discount rates could limit comparability
between entities.
BC205B The Board made no amendments to IFRS 17 in response to that feedback. In

the Board’s view, requiring an entity to determine discount rates using a rule-
based approach would result in outcomes that are appropriate only in some
circumstances. IFRS 17 requires entities to apply judgement when
determining the inputs most applicable in the circumstances. To enable users
of financial statements to understand the discount rates used, and to facilitate
comparability between entities, IFRS 17 requires entities to disclose
information about the methods used and judgements applied.
Risk adjustment for non-financial risk (paragraphs 37 and

...
BC207 This section discusses:
(a) ...
(b) the techniques for estimating the risk adjustment for non-financial
risk (see paragraphs BC213–BC214CBC214); and
(c) ...
Paragraphs BC214A‒BC214C and the headings above paragraphs BC214A and BC214B
are added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on the subjectivity in determining

the risk adjustment for non-financial risk
BC214A When the Board considered feedback from entities implementing IFRS 17, it
also considered feedback from users of financial statements that the principle-
based requirements for determining the risk adjustment for non-financial risk
could limit comparability between entities. The Board made no amendments
to IFRS 17 in response to that feedback, for the same reason it made no
amendments in response to similar feedback on discount rates (see
paragraph BC205B).
IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on the risk adjustment for non-

financial risk in consolidated financial statements
BC214B The Transition Resource Group for IFRS 17 discussed an implementation
question on determining the risk adjustment for non-financial risk in the
consolidated financial statements of a group of entities. Transition Resource
Group members held different views. Some members thought the risk
adjustment for non-financial risk for a group of insurance contracts must be
the same in the issuing subsidiary’s stand-alone financial statements as in the
consolidated financial statements of the group of entities. Other members
thought the risk adjustment for non-financial risk may be measured
differently in the issuing subsidiary’s stand-alone financial statements from
how it is measured in the consolidated financial statements of the group of
entities.
BC214C The Board considered whether it should clarify its intention for determining
the risk adjustment for non-financial risk in the consolidated financial
statements of a group of entities in response to those different views. The
Board concluded that doing so would address only some differences that could
arise in the application of the requirements for determining the risk
adjustment for non-financial risk, given the judgement required to apply
those requirements. The Board concluded that practice needs to develop in
this area. If necessary, the Board will seek to understand how the
requirements are being applied as part of the Post-implementation Review of
IFRS 17.
Paragraphs BC220‒BC221 and the heading above paragraph BC218 are amended. New
Measurement of the contractual service margin (paragraphs 38,

43–46 and B96–B119BB119 of IFRS 17)
...
BC220 IFRS 17 requires the carrying amount of the contractual service margin to be
adjusted for (see paragraphs 44 and 45 of IFRS 17):
(a) ...
(b) insurance finance income or expenses (see paragraphs BC270–

BC276EBC276); and
(c) ...
BC221 The resulting carrying amount at the end of the reporting period is allocated
over the current and future periods, and the amount relating to the current
period is recognised in profit or loss (see paragraphs BC279–BC283JBC283).
Paragraphs BC222‒BC223 are amended. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck
through.
Changes in estimates of the future unearned profit

(paragraphs 44, 45 and B96–B118 of IFRS 17)
BC222 The key service provided by insurance contracts is insurance coverage, but
contracts may also provide investment-related or other services. The
measurement of a group of insurance contracts at initial recognition includes
a contractual service margin, which represents the margin the entity has
charged for the services it provides in addition to bearing risk. The expected
margin charged for bearing risk is represented by the risk adjustment for non-
financial risk (see paragraphs BC206–BC214CBC214).
BC223 IFRS 17 requires an entity to measure the contractual service margin, on

initial recognition of the group of insurance contracts, as the difference
between the expected present value of cash inflows and the expected present
value of cash outflows, after adjusting for uncertainty and any cash flows
received or paid before or on initial recognition. IFRS 17 also requires an
entity to update the measurement of the contractual service margin for
changes in estimates of the fulfilment cash flows relating to future service, for
the following reasons:
(a) changes in estimates of the fulfilment cash flows relating to future

service affect the future profitability of the group of insurance
contracts. Thus, adjusting the contractual service margin to reflect
these changes provides more relevant information about the
remaining unearned profit in the group of insurance contracts after
initial recognition than not adjusting the contractual service margin.
Paragraphs BC227–BC237 discuss which changes in estimates relate to
future service for insurance contracts without direct participation
features, and paragraphs BC238–BC256HBC256 discuss which changes
relate to future service for insurance contracts with direct
participation features.
...
A footnote is added to the end of paragraph BC224(d). For ease of reading new text is not
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph B96(d) of IFRS 17 to clarify that if
an entity chooses to disaggregate changes in the risk adjustment for non-
financial risk between the insurance service result and insurance finance
income or expenses, the entity should adjust the contractual service margin
only for the changes related to non-financial risk (and not for changes in the
risk adjustment for non-financial risk that result from the effects of the time
value of money).
IFRS STANDARD
Insurance contracts without direct participation features

(paragraphs 44 and B96–B100 of IFRS 17)
BC227 In determining which changes in estimates relate to future service, IFRS 17
distinguishes two types of insurance contracts: those without direct
participation features and those with direct participation features. Insurance
contracts with direct participation features are discussed in paragraphs
BC238–BC269CBC269.
underlined.
* Paragraph B96(c) of IFRS 17 requires changes in fulfilment cash flows that

arise from differences between any investment component expected to
become payable in the period and the actual investment component that
becomes payable in the period to adjust the contractual service margin. In
June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to specify that paragraph B96(c) of
IFRS 17 does not apply to insurance finance income or expenses that depict
the effect on the investment component of the time value of money and
financial risk between the beginning of the period and the unexpected
payment or non-payment of the investment component.
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended the requirements relating to the effect of
accounting estimates made in interim financial statements (see paragraphs
BC236A‒BC236D).
Paragraphs BC236A‒BC236D and the heading above paragraph BC236A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—the effect of accounting estimates made

in interim financial statements
BC236A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to choose
whether to change the treatment of accounting estimates made in previous
interim financial statements when applying IFRS 17 in subsequent interim
financial statements and in the annual reporting period.
BC236B The requirement relating to accounting estimates made in interim financial

statements as described in paragraph BC236 was developed in response to
feedback during the development of IFRS 17 that recalculating the carrying
amount of the contractual service margin from the beginning to the end of an
annual reporting period, when an entity has prepared interim financial
statements during that period, would be a significant practical burden.
However, some entities implementing IFRS 17 as issued in May 2017 said that
the requirement described in paragraph BC236 would result in a practical
burden that would be more significant than the burden the Board had

intended to alleviate. Some of those entities said that the requirement was a
burden particularly for entities in a consolidated group that report at different
frequencies from each other, because there would be a need to maintain two
sets of records to reflect the different treatments of the accounting estimates.
BC236C The Board concluded that permitting an accounting policy choice as described
in paragraph BC236A would ease IFRS 17 implementation by enabling an
entity to assess which accounting policy would be less burdensome. To avoid a
significant loss of useful information for users of financial statements, an
entity is required to consistently apply its choice to all groups of insurance
contracts it issues and groups of reinsurance contracts it holds (that is, the
accounting policy choice is at the reporting entity level).
BC236D The Board added a relief, related to the amendment, to the transition
requirements for entities applying IFRS 17 for the first time (see paragraphs
C14A and C19A of IFRS 17).
underlined.
* The Board subsequently reaffirmed this view when it considered similar

feedback from entities implementing IFRS 17 (see paragraph BC249C).
Amendments to IFRS 17—scope of the variable fee approach

(paragraphs B101 and B107 of IFRS 17)
BC249A The requirements of IFRS 17 with the additional adjustments to the
contractual service margin described in paragraph BC246 are referred to as
the variable fee approach. Some entities implementing IFRS 17 suggested the
Board expand the scope of the variable fee approach to include:
(a) insurance contracts that some stakeholders view as economically

similar to insurance contracts with direct participation features,
except that these contracts do not meet the criterion in
paragraph B101(a) of IFRS 17; and
(b) reinsurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held, which are
explicitly excluded from the scope of the variable fee approach
applying paragraph B109 of IFRS 17.
BC249B The Board considered but rejected the suggestions described in

paragraph BC249A(a). The additional adjustments to the contractual service
margin in the variable fee approach were designed specifically to faithfully
represent the profit from insurance contracts within the scope of the variable
fee approach. Therefore, if the Board were to amend the scope of the variable
fee approach, it would need to consider amending those adjustments. The
Board also observed that whatever the scope of the variable fee approach,
differences would arise between the accounting for contracts within the scope
and contracts outside the scope.

IFRS STANDARD
BC249C The Board considered but rejected suggestions described in

paragraph BC249A(b). The Board concluded that reinsurance contracts are not
substantially investment-related service contracts. The variable fee approach
was designed specifically so an entity issuing insurance contracts that are
substantially investment-related service contracts would account for profit
similarly to an entity issuing asset management contracts. Some stakeholders
said that excluding reinsurance contracts held from the scope of the variable
fee approach creates an accounting mismatch when a reinsurance contract
held covers underlying insurance contracts that are within the scope of the
variable fee approach. The Board responded to that concern by amending the
risk mitigation option (see paragraphs BC256A‒BC256B).
BC249D In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph B107 of IFRS 17 to replace a
reference to ‘the group of insurance contracts’ with ‘the insurance contract’.
Applying paragraph B101 of IFRS 17, an entity assesses whether an insurance
contract (rather than a group of insurance contracts) is within the scope of the
variable fee approach. The reference to a group of insurance contracts in
paragraph B107 of IFRS 17 was a drafting error and was inconsistent with the
requirements in paragraph B101 of IFRS 17. Some stakeholders said this
amendment would be a major change and disruptive to IFRS 17
implementation. Those stakeholders had assumed that an entity was required
to apply the criteria for the scope of the variable fee approach at a group level.
The Board concluded that it needed to fix the drafting error in paragraph B107
of IFRS 17 to enable consistent application of the requirements. The Board
noted that some stakeholders had interpreted a contract-level assessment as
being more burdensome than it is because they thought an individual
assessment was required for every contract. However, the Board observed that
one assessment should be sufficient for an entity to determine whether the
criteria are met for each contract in a set of homogenous contracts issued in
the same market conditions and priced on the same basis.
A footnote is added to paragraph BC255 after ‘from those fulfilment cash flows:’. For ease
of reading new text is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to clarify that an entity ceases to
apply the risk mitigation option if, and only if, the conditions described in
paragraph BC255 cease to be met.
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 so that the risk mitigation option
also applies in specified circumstances when an entity mitigates financial risk
using reinsurance contracts held or non-derivative financial instruments
measured at fair value through profit or loss (see paragraphs BC256A‒BC256F).

Paragraphs BC256A‒BC256F and the heading above paragraph BC256A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—risk mitigation using instruments other than

derivatives
BC256A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to extend the risk mitigation option
in paragraphs B115−B116 of IFRS 17 to apply when an entity uses:
(a) reinsurance contracts held to mitigate the effect of financial risk on

the amount of the entity’s share of the underlying items or the
fulfilment cash flows set out in paragraph B113(b) of IFRS 17 (see
paragraph BC256B); or
(b) non-derivative financial instruments measured at fair value through

profit or loss to mitigate the effect of financial risk on the fulfilment
cash flows set out in paragraph B113(b) of IFRS 17 (see
paragraph BC256C).
BC256B Some stakeholders said that applying the requirements in IFRS 17 results in
an accounting mismatch when an entity holds a reinsurance contract that
covers insurance contracts with direct participation features. The entity
accounts for the underlying insurance contracts issued, but not the
reinsurance contract held, applying the variable fee approach. Reinsurance
contracts that cover insurance contracts with direct participation features
transfer both non-financial and financial risk to the reinsurer. The Board
considered but rejected a suggestion to permit an entity to apply the variable
fee approach to such reinsurance contracts held (see paragraph BC249C).
However, the Board acknowledged that when an entity mitigates the effect of
financial risk using a reinsurance contract held, an accounting mismatch
could arise that is similar to the mismatch that could arise when an entity
mitigates the effect of financial risk using derivatives (see paragraph BC252).
Accordingly, the Board amended IFRS 17 so that the risk mitigation option
applies in the same way when an entity uses reinsurance contracts held as
when an entity uses derivatives.
BC256C Some stakeholders said that some entities mitigate the effect of some financial
risk on fulfilment cash flows that do not vary with returns on underlying
items (the cash flows set out in paragraph B113(b) of IFRS 17) using non-
derivative financial instruments. The Board was persuaded that if such non-
derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value through profit or
loss, an accounting mismatch could arise, which is similar to the accounting
mismatch for derivatives (see paragraph BC252). Accordingly, the Board
extended the risk mitigation option to apply in such circumstances. The Board
decided to limit the extension to only non-derivative financial instruments
measured at fair value through profit or loss. For such non-derivative financial
instruments, the extension resolves the accounting mismatch in the same way
it resolves the accounting mismatch for derivatives (which are also measured
at fair value through profit or loss).

IFRS STANDARD
BC256D The Board considered but rejected a suggestion that an entity should be
permitted to apply the risk mitigation option when it uses non-derivative
financial instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive
income. The Board observed that in most circumstances the risk mitigation
option would not resolve perceived mismatches between amounts recognised
in profit or loss relating to:
(a) insurance contracts with direct participation features using the other
comprehensive income option in IFRS 17; and
(b) assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
BC256E The amounts described in paragraph BC256D will differ depending on when
the financial assets and the insurance liabilities are acquired or issued and
depending on their duration. Further, the suggestion in paragraph BC256D
would have resulted in any ineffectiveness of the risk mitigation strategy
being recognised in other comprehensive income. That would be inconsistent
with the hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 which result in the
ineffectiveness of hedging strategies having a transparent effect on profit or
loss. The Board observed that an entity could avoid mismatches by applying
together the fair value option in IFRS 9 (to designate financial assets at fair
value through profit or loss) and the risk mitigation option in IFRS 17.
BC256F The Board also considered but rejected a suggestion that an entity should be
permitted to apply the risk mitigation option when it uses non-derivative
financial instruments to mitigate the effect of financial risk on the entity’s
share of the fair value of the underlying items (see paragraph B112 of IFRS 17).
Some stakeholders said that an entity may mitigate such financial risk by
investing premiums in assets other than the underlying items—for example,
fixed rate bonds. The Board concluded that permitting an entity to apply the
risk mitigation option in that circumstance would contradict the principle
that an entity need not hold the underlying items for the variable fee
approach to apply (see paragraph BC246).
Paragraphs BC256G‒BC256H and the heading above paragraph BC256G are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—applying the risk mitigation option and the

other comprehensive income option (paragraphs 87A‒89 and B117A of
IFRS 17)
BC256G In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to specify that paragraphs 88 and 89
of IFRS 17 do not apply to the insurance finance income or expenses that arise
from the application of the risk mitigation option. Instead, the Board specified
that such insurance finance income or expenses are presented in:
(a) profit or loss if the entity mitigates financial risk using financial
instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss; and
(b) profit or loss or other comprehensive income applying the same

accounting policy the entity applies to a reinsurance contract held if
the entity mitigates financial risk using that reinsurance contract held.

BC256H The amendment described in paragraph BC256G resolves a mismatch that

would otherwise have arisen between amounts recognised in profit or loss for
a group of insurance contracts with direct participation features and amounts
recognised in profit or loss on the items used to mitigate financial risk arising
from the insurance contracts. The mismatch would have arisen if an entity
determined the amounts recognised in profit or loss on the group of insurance
contracts by applying both paragraph 89 of IFRS 17 (to include some insurance
finance income or expenses in other comprehensive income) and
paragraph B115 of IFRS 17 (the risk mitigation option).
A footnote is added to the end of paragraphs BC265‒BC269. For ease of reading new text
is not underlined.
* When developing the June 2020 amendments to IFRS 17, the Board noted that
some entities described in practice as mutual entities do not have the feature
that the most residual interest of the entity is due to a policyholder (see
paragraphs BC269A‒BC269C). Paragraphs BC265‒BC269 describe the outcome
of applying IFRS 17 for entities for which the most residual interest of the
entity is due to a policyholder.
Paragraphs BC269A‒BC269C and the heading above paragraph BC269A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on insurers that are mutual entities

BC269A Entities implementing IFRS 17 expressed the following concerns about mutual
entities:
(a) applying IFRS 17 as described in paragraph BC265 would result in a

misleading depiction of the financial position and financial
performance of an entity with the feature that the most residual
interest of the entity is due to a policyholder; and
(b) some entities described in practice as mutual entities do not have the
feature that the most residual interest of the entity is due to a
policyholder.
BC269B The Board reaffirmed its decision that IFRS 17 should not include any specific
requirements or exceptions to requirements in IFRS 17 for entities that issue
insurance contracts under which the most residual interest of the entity is
due to a policyholder because:
(a) a core principle of IFRS 17 applicable to all entities is the requirement

to include in the fulfilment cash flows all the expected future cash
flows that arise within the boundary of insurance contracts, including
discretionary cash flows and those due to future policyholders;
(b) if entities were required to account for the same insurance contract
differently depending on the type of entity issuing the contract,
comparability among entities would be reduced; and
(c) a robust definition of entities to which different requirements would

apply would be difficult to create.

IFRS STANDARD
BC269C In response to the concern described in paragraph BC269A(b), the Board added
the footnote to paragraphs BC265‒BC269.
Paragraphs BC276A‒BC276E and the heading above paragraph BC276A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on discount rates used to

determine adjustments to the contractual service margin
BC276A For insurance contracts without direct participation features, differences arise
between a change in the fulfilment cash flows measured using current
discount rates, and the resulting adjustment to the contractual service margin
measured using discount rates locked in at initial recognition (see
paragraph BC275). Consistent with the feedback set out in paragraph BC274,
entities implementing IFRS 17 continued to express concerns about such
differences.
BC276B Some stakeholders suggested that an amendment to require an entity to

measure adjustments to the contractual service margin using the current
discount rates used for the measurement of the fulfilment cash flows would
reduce the operational burden of applying the Standard. Others said such an
amendment would be conceptually appropriate.
BC276C The fulfilment cash flows and the contractual service margin are the two
components of the measurement of insurance contracts. The fulfilment cash
flows are a current risk-adjusted estimate of future cash flows expected to
arise from a group of insurance contracts. In contrast, the contractual service
margin is the profit expected to arise from future service that an entity will
provide for a group of insurance contracts. The contractual service margin on
initial recognition of a group is the difference between the estimated cash
inflows and estimated cash outflows (adjusted for the effect of the time value
of money, non-financial risk and financial risk). The contractual service
margin is not a future cash flow. When changes in fulfilment cash flows
relate to future service, the expected profit relating to that future service
changes. Accordingly, those changes in estimates adjust the contractual
service margin.
BC276D The Board considered but rejected the suggestions to amend IFRS 17 described
in paragraph BC276B for the reasons that led it to conclude, while developing
IFRS 17, that an entity should determine adjustments to the contractual
service margin using locked-in discount rates (see paragraphs BC273‒BC275).
An entity would measure profit inconsistently if it were to measure the effect
of future cash flows on the contractual service margin at discount rates that
differed depending on when such future cash flows become part of the
expected cash flows. The Board concluded that measuring the contractual
service margin at the discount rates determined at the date of initial
recognition (that is, locked-in discount rates) provides a faithful
representation of the revenue earned as the entity provides services, reflecting
the price set at the contract issue date for that service. In contrast, measuring
changes in the contractual service margin using current rates would result in
arbitrary amounts relating to the effects of changes in discount rates being

reflected in the insurance service result rather than in insurance finance

income or expenses. A core benefit introduced by IFRS 17 is the presentation
of insurance finance income or expenses separately from the insurance service
result.
BC276E The Board disagreed with stakeholders who said that entities would have
difficulty explaining to users of financial statements a gain or loss arising
from the differences between a change in fulfilment cash flows and a change
in the adjustment to the contractual service margin. The Board observed that
the gain or loss provides information about the cumulative amount of
insurance finance income or expenses that had been previously recognised
and should be reversed, or the amount that was not previously recognised and
now is.
The heading above paragraph BC279 is amended. New text is underlined.
Recognition in profit or loss (paragraphs 44(e), 45(e) and

B119‒B119B of IFRS 17)
...
A footnote is added to the end of paragraphs BC279, BC280 and BC283. For ease of
Paragraphs BC283A‒BC283J and the headings above paragraphs BC283A and BC283J
Amendments to IFRS 17—contractual service margin attributable

to investment-return service and investment-related service
BC283A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to:
(a) require an entity to identify coverage units for insurance contracts

without direct participation features considering the quantity of
benefits and expected period of investment-return service, if any, in
addition to insurance coverage. Paragraph B119B of IFRS 17 specifies
criteria for when such contracts may provide an investment-return
service.
(b) clarify that an entity is required to identify coverage units for

insurance contracts with direct participation features considering the
quantity of benefits and expected period of both insurance coverage
and investment-related service.
(c) require an entity to include investment activity costs in the fulfilment

cash flows, to the extent that the entity performs those activities to:
(i) enhance benefits from insurance coverage for policyholders

(see paragraph B65(ka)(i) of IFRS 17);

IFRS STANDARD
(ii) provide investment-return service to policyholders of insurance

contracts without direct participation features (see
paragraph B119B of IFRS 17); or
(iii) provide investment-related service to policyholders of insurance

contracts with direct participation features.
(d) define ‘insurance contract services’ as comprising insurance coverage,

investment-return service and investment-related service.
(e) expand the definitions of a liability for remaining coverage and a

liability for incurred claims to reflect an entity’s obligation to provide
insurance contract services and any other obligations arising from
insurance contracts.
BC283B The Board was persuaded that some insurance contracts without direct
participation features provide an investment-return service (see
paragraph BC283A(a)). Recognising the contractual service margin considering
both insurance coverage and an investment-return service will provide useful
information to users of financial statements, particularly for contracts that
have an insurance coverage period that differs from the period in which the
policyholder benefits from an investment-return service.
BC283C The Board concluded that an investment-return service exists only if the
contract includes an investment component or the policyholder has a right to
withdraw an amount from the entity. Further, those amounts must be
expected to include an investment return that the entity generates by
performing investment activity. The Board concluded that if those conditions
are not met, the policyholder has no right to benefit from investment returns.
In this context, a ‘right to withdraw an amount from the entity’ includes a
policyholder’s right to:
(a) receive a surrender value or refund of premiums on cancellation of a

policy; or
(b) transfer an amount to another insurance provider.
BC283D Without the Standard specifying conditions for the existence of an

investment-return service, entities issuing the same type of contracts might
make different decisions from each other about whether those contracts
provide an investment-return service. Entities might also conclude that an
investment-return service exists in circumstances in which the Board would
conclude otherwise (for example, when an entity provides only custodial
services relating to an investment component). On the other hand, specifying
conditions creates the risk of an inappropriate outcome in some scenarios.
BC283E Balancing the potential risks described in paragraph BC283D, the Board
decided to specify conditions that are necessary to identify, but are not
determinative of, the existence of an investment-return service (see
paragraph B119B of IFRS 17). An entity is required to apply judgement,
considering the facts and circumstances, to determine whether an insurance
contract that meets the conditions provides an investment-return service.

BC283F Including an investment-return service in addition to insurance coverage in

determining coverage units for insurance contracts without direct
participation features adds subjectivity and complexity to that determination.
However, the Board noted that entities are required to make similar
assessments for insurance contracts with direct participation features and for
contracts that provide more than one type of insurance coverage.
Furthermore, any additional subjectivity and complexity would be mitigated
by the related disclosure required by paragraph 109 of IFRS 17, which provides
users of financial statements with useful information about the pattern of
service provision.
BC283G Applying IFRS 17 as amended in June 2020, an entity recognises the

contractual service margin in profit or loss over the period the entity provides
insurance contract services. Therefore, as part of the June 2020 amendments,
the Board added ‘insurance contract services’ to the defined terms of IFRS 17
(see paragraph BC283A(d)) and inserted the defined term into the
requirements in IFRS 17 for the recognition of the contractual service margin.
Insurance contract services are the only services that an entity considers when
determining coverage units and hence the recognition of the contractual
service margin in profit or loss.
BC283H The Board decided against inserting that defined term into the requirements
in IFRS 17 relating to the recognition of insurance revenue (for example,
paragraph 83 of IFRS 17). This is not because other services are considered in
determining insurance revenue, but rather because inserting that defined
term there might be interpreted as prohibiting an entity from recognising
insurance revenue unrelated to the contractual service margin before the
coverage period begins. Insurance revenue can be analysed as consisting of the
amount of the contractual service margin allocated to the period, the release
of the risk adjustment for non-financial risk in the period and the expenses
the entity expected to incur in the period. Some insurance contracts include a
pre-coverage period, between the date the contract is recognised and the date
the entity first provides insurance contract services. In contracts with a pre-
coverage period, an entity may be released from non-financial risk, or may
incur expenses before the coverage period begins—in other words, before the
entity starts providing insurance contract services. The Board did not want to
preclude an entity from recognising the related insurance revenue in that pre-
coverage period.
BC283I Investment activity costs that an entity incurs are included in the fulfilment
cash flows to the extent that the entity incurs those costs to provide
investment-return service or investment-related service. The Board
acknowledged that an entity may also incur investment activity costs to
enhance benefits from insurance coverage for policyholders. Therefore, the
Board amended IFRS 17 to specify that an entity is required to include
investment activity costs in the fulfilment cash flows to the extent that the
entity performs those activities to enhance benefits from insurance coverage
for policyholders. The Board also specified when investment activities enhance
benefits from insurance coverage. The Board noted that in determining
whether investment activity costs enhance benefits from insurance coverage

IFRS STANDARD
for policyholders, an entity needs to apply judgement in a similar manner to

when an entity determines whether an investment-return service exists.
Other approaches considered but rejected

BC283J Some stakeholders said the Board should replace the requirements for the
recognition of the contractual service margin in profit or loss with a less
specific requirement based on all services provided by the contract. Applying
this suggestion, an entity would decide what services are provided by the
contract, potentially including services other than insurance coverage or
services related to investment returns. The Board concluded that specifying
that an entity recognises the contractual service margin by considering all
services would result in more subjectivity and complexity than entities
already face when determining the pattern of service provision. Feedback the
Board received when developing IFRS 17 supports that view. Furthermore, the
Board noted that the concerns leading to this suggestion were generally about
services related to investment returns. The Board concluded that the
amendment described in paragraph BC283A(a) responds to feedback that some
insurance contracts without direct participation features have two defining
services—insurance coverage and investment-return service. Thus, the
amendment balances the need for relevant information about the way in
which profit from the contract is earned and the need for comparable
information, as well as the costs of applying the coverage units requirement.
A footnote is added to paragraph BC284 after ‘immediately in profit or loss.’. For ease of
* In June 2020, the Board amended paragraphs 48(a) and 50(b) of IFRS 17 for
measuring onerous insurance contracts to clarify that those paragraphs relate
to both changes in estimates of future cash flows and changes in the risk
adjustment for non-financial risk.
underlined.
Paragraph BC303 and the heading above paragraph BC296 are amended. New text is
Reinsurance contracts (paragraphs 60–70A70 of IFRS 17)

...
BC303 The following paragraphs discuss aspects of the general principles in IFRS 17
in relation to groups of reinsurance contracts held:
...
(c) cash flows (see paragraphs BC307–BC309FBC309); and

(d) contractual service margin (see paragraphs BC310–BC315LBC315).
is stuck through.
Recognition for groups of reinsurance contracts held

(paragraphs 62‒62Aparagraph 62 of IFRS 17)
...
Paragraph BC305A is added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
BC305A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 for reinsurance contracts held when
underlying insurance contracts are onerous at initial recognition (see
paragraphs BC315A‒BC315L). As a consequence of that amendment, the Board
also amended the requirement in paragraph 62 of IFRS 17 (for recognising a
group of reinsurance contracts held) to require an entity to recognise a group
of reinsurance contracts held when the entity recognises onerous underlying
insurance contracts, if it does so earlier than when the entity would otherwise
recognise the group of reinsurance contracts held. The Board concluded such
an amendment was necessary for income to be recognised on a group of
reinsurance contracts held at the same time that losses are recognised on
initial recognition of onerous underlying insurance contracts.
A heading is added above paragraph BC307. For ease of reading new text is not
underlined.
Expected credit losses

...
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on the cash flows in the

boundary of a reinsurance contract held
BC309A Estimates of future cash flows included in the measurement of a group of
reinsurance contracts held include future cash flows that relate to insurance
contracts an entity expects to be covered by the reinsurance contracts held in
the group. Such cash flows include cash flows related to insurance contracts
the entity expects to issue in the future if the entity has a substantive right to
receive reinsurance coverage for those insurance contracts. The Board
considered a suggestion from entities implementing IFRS 17 to amend IFRS 17
to exclude from the measurement of the group of reinsurance contracts held
cash flows that relate to underlying insurance contracts that are yet to be
issued.

IFRS STANDARD
BC309B The Board noted that the suggestion in paragraph BC309A, which is consistent
with feedback during the development of IFRS 17, would achieve an outcome
similar to the practice often used applying IFRS 4 whereby an entity measured
reinsurance contracts held based on the measurement of existing underlying
BC309C The Board reaffirmed its view that the accounting for a reinsurance contract
held should be consistent with the accounting for insurance contracts issued
(see paragraph BC298). Consistent accounting includes measuring the
expected value of all the entity’s rights and obligations arising from a
contract. When an entity holds a reinsurance contract that provides the entity
with a substantive right to receive reinsurance coverage for insurance
contracts it expects to issue, cash flows arising from that substantive right are
included in the measurement of the reinsurance contract held (that is, those
cash flows are within the boundary of the reinsurance contract held applying
paragraph 34 of IFRS 17). In contrast, if a reinsurance contract held provides
an entity with neither substantive rights nor substantive obligations relating
to insurance contracts it expects to issue, those insurance contracts would be
outside the boundary of the reinsurance contract held. The requirements for
expected future cash flows in paragraphs 33−35 of IFRS 17 form a core aspect
of the Standard. The Board identified no reason for these requirements to be
applied inconsistently—they should be applied both to insurance contracts
issued and reinsurance contracts held.
BC309D The Board noted that including all expected future cash flows in the
measurement of the contractual service margin at initial recognition of the
group of reinsurance contracts held reflects the conditions under which the
entity agreed, under specified terms, to receive services from the reinsurer for
future insurance contracts it expects to issue.
BC309E Some stakeholders said that the requirements in IFRS 17 create an accounting
mismatch when an entity has a substantive right to receive reinsurance
coverage relating to insurance contracts it expects to issue. They said such a
mismatch arises because expected future cash flows that relate to the
reinsurance of those insurance contracts will be included in the measurement
of the reinsurance contract held before those underlying insurance contracts
are issued. The Board disagreed that differences between the carrying amount
of the reinsurance contract held and the underlying insurance contracts are
accounting mismatches. The carrying amount of a reinsurance contract held
is nil before any cash flows occur or any service is received. Thereafter any
differences that arise between the carrying amount of the reinsurance
contract held and the underlying insurance contracts are not accounting
mismatches. Rather they are differences caused by:
(a) the provision of coverage—for example, because the reinsurer provides

coverage for less than 100 per cent of the risks the entity covers;
(b) the timing of cash flows; and

(c) interest accreted on the contractual service margin of the reinsurance

contract held from an earlier period than, and at a different discount
rate from, the interest accreted on the contractual service margin of
the underlying insurance contracts, reflecting the different effects of
the time value of money on the contractual service margin and
fulfilment cash flows.
BC309F The Board acknowledged that some entities will incur costs implementing
IFRS 17 for reinsurance contracts held because doing so would be a change
from previous practice. However, the Board concluded that the benefits of
appropriately reflecting an entity’s rights and obligations as the holder of a
reinsurance contract outweigh those costs. Accordingly, the Board rejected the
suggestion to amend the contract boundary requirements in IFRS 17 for
reinsurance contracts held.
is struck through.
Gains and losses on buying reinsurance (paragraphs 65‒

65A, 66A‒66B and B119D‒B119Fparagraph 65 of IFRS 17)
...
Paragraphs BC315A‒BC315L and the headings above paragraphs BC315A and BC315J
Amendments to IFRS 17—recovery of losses on underlying

insurance contracts (paragraphs 66A‒66B and B119D‒B119F of
IFRS 17)
BC315A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to adjust the
contractual service margin of a group of reinsurance contracts held, and as a
result recognise income, when the entity recognises a loss on initial
recognition of an onerous group of underlying insurance contracts or on
addition of onerous contracts to a group. An entity determines the income on
the reinsurance contract held (ie the amount of loss recovered) by multiplying:
(a) the loss recognised on the underlying insurance contracts; and
(b) the percentage of claims on underlying insurance contracts the entity

expects to recover from the reinsurance contracts held.
BC315B As a practical assumption, the amendment treats:
(a) a loss recognised on an underlying insurance contract as the early

recognition of a portion of expected claims; and
(b) a loss recovery recognised on the reinsurance contract held as the early
recognition of a portion of expected claim recoveries.

IFRS STANDARD
BC315C For the amendment described in paragraph BC315A to apply, an entity must
enter into the reinsurance contract held before or at the same time as the
entity recognises the onerous underlying insurance contracts. The Board
concluded it would not be appropriate for an entity to recognise a recovery of
loss when the entity does not hold a reinsurance contract.
BC315D As a consequence of the amendment described in paragraph BC315A, the

Board also:
(a) amended IFRS 17 to require an entity that has entered into a

reinsurance contract held to recognise the related group of
reinsurance contracts held when the entity recognises onerous
underlying insurance contracts, if that is earlier than the date the
entity would otherwise recognise the group of reinsurance contracts
held (see paragraphs 62‒62A of IFRS 17).
(b) added requirements to IFRS 17 relating to recovery of losses from a

reinsurance contract held:
(i) in a transfer of insurance contracts that do not form a business

and in a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3 (see
paragraphs B95B‒B95D of IFRS 17); and
(ii) in applying IFRS 17 for the first time (see paragraphs C16A‒
C16C and C20A‒C20B of IFRS 17).
BC315E The amendment responds to concerns that, applying IFRS 17 before the
amendment, an entity would have recognised a loss on initial recognition of
an onerous group of insurance contracts (or on addition of onerous contracts
to a group), without recognising corresponding income on a reinsurance
contract held that covers that onerous group of insurance contracts. Some
stakeholders said this is an accounting mismatch and suggested the Board
amend IFRS 17 so that income is recognised on the reinsurance contract held
at the same time losses are recognised on initial recognition of onerous
underlying insurance contracts. That income would reflect the entity’s right
to recover those losses.
BC315F The Board was persuaded that such an amendment was justified because:
(a) paragraph 66(c) of IFRS 17 provides a similar exception from the

general measurement requirements for changes in the measurement
of a group of reinsurance contracts held that arise from changes in the
measurement of underlying insurance contracts (see
paragraph BC315).
(b) the amendment provides users of financial statements with useful

information about expected loss recoveries on reinsurance contracts
held that complements the information about expected losses on
underlying insurance contracts. The information provided about
onerous underlying contracts is unchanged. Losses and loss recoveries
are presented in separate line items in the statement(s) of financial
performance and are disclosed separately in the notes to the financial
statements.

BC315G The Board acknowledged, however, that the amendment adds complexity to
IFRS 17 because it requires an entity to track a loss-recovery component. On
balance, the Board concluded that the added complexity is justified given the
strong stakeholder support for the information that will result from entities
applying the amendment. The Board also noted that, applying the
amendment, the loss-recovery component of a reinsurance contract held is
treated similarly to the loss component of insurance contracts issued. That
similarity will help entities to understand how to apply the amendment,
reducing the complexity caused.
BC315H An entity might group together onerous insurance contracts covered by a

reinsurance contract held and onerous insurance contracts not covered by a
reinsurance contract held. To apply the amendment described in
paragraph BC315A in that circumstance, an entity needs to determine
amounts at a level that is lower than the level of the group of insurance
contracts. IFRS 17 does not require an entity to track insurance contracts at a
level lower than the level of the group of insurance contracts. Accordingly, the
Board specified that, in that circumstance, an entity applies a systematic and
rational method of allocation to determine the portion of losses on a group of
insurance contracts that relates to underlying insurance contracts covered by
a reinsurance contract held. Requiring a systematic and rational method of
allocation is consistent with other requirements in IFRS 17.
BC315I The Board noted that specifying that an entity use a systematic and rational
method of allocation in a specified circumstance, such as the one described in
paragraph BC315H, does not prohibit an entity from using a systematic and
rational method of allocation as part of other estimation processes required in
applying IFRS 17 if doing so meets the objective set by IFRS 17 for those
estimation processes. The Board’s decision to specify that an entity use a
systematic and rational method of allocation in the specific circumstance
described in paragraph BC315H was driven by the need to avoid the potential
misinterpretation described in that paragraph. The need for such specification
in this case does not imply that an entity cannot use a systematic and rational
method of allocation in circumstances when it is not specified in the
requirements of IFRS 17.

BC315J In the 2019 Exposure Draft, the Board had proposed limiting the amendment
to a defined population of reinsurance contracts held—those that provide
proportionate coverage. For such contracts, an entity can easily identify the
portion of losses on underlying insurance contracts that the entity has a right
to recover. For other reinsurance contracts held, the Board was concerned that
entities would have difficulty identifying that portion and thus may need to
make arbitrary allocations. However, in the light of feedback on the Exposure
Draft, the Board concluded that it should not impose that limitation.
Respondents to the Exposure Draft reported that if the Board had limited the
amendment in that way, the amendment would apply to few reinsurance
contracts held in practice. Further, respondents said that an entity could
identify the portion of losses the entity has a right to recover for any
reinsurance contract held in a non-arbitrary way based on the expected claim

IFRS STANDARD
recovery cash flows included in the measurement of the reinsurance contract

held. For example, consider a reinsurance contract held that provides cover
over an aggregate amount of claims on 100 underlying insurance contracts—
some of which are in a profitable group and the others in an onerous group.
The entity could determine the portion of losses on the onerous contracts that
the entity has a right to recover by comparing:
(a) total expected claim recoveries from the reinsurance contract held;
and
(b) total expected claims for all underlying insurance contracts.
BC315K The Board considered a view that the amendment described in

paragraph BC315A should apply only when a reinsurance contract held is in a
net gain position—in other words, when an entity expects to receive from the
reinsurer claim recoveries that are higher than the premium the entity pays
to the reinsurer (see paragraph BC310). The Board disagreed with this view
because an entity has a right to recover claims from the reinsurance contract
held regardless of whether claim recoveries are expected to be higher or lower
than the premiums the entity pays to the reinsurer.
BC315L The Board also considered an alternative suggestion to require a loss on a

group of insurance contracts to be treated as a negative contractual service
margin to the extent that the contracts in the group are covered by a
reinsurance contract held on a proportionate basis. The Board disagreed with
this suggestion because it is inconsistent with the Board’s objective to
recognise losses on insurance contracts when expected.
is struck through.
Transfers of insurance contracts and business combinations

(paragraphs 39 and B93–B95FB95 of IFRS 17)
...
A footnote is added to the end of the first sentence of paragraph BC324 and to the end of
paragraph BC325. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to replace references to ‘a business

combination’ in paragraphs 39 and B93‒B95 of IFRS 17 with ‘a business
combination within the scope of IFRS 3’ (see paragraph BC327A).

Amendments to IFRS 17—business combinations outside

the scope of IFRS 3
BC327A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to specify that an entity is required
to apply paragraph 38 of IFRS 17 in accordance with paragraphs B93‒B95F of
IFRS 17 to insurance contracts acquired in a business combination within the
scope of IFRS 3. An entity is not required to apply the measurement
requirements in those paragraphs to insurance contracts acquired in a
business combination outside the scope of IFRS 3 (that is, a business
combination under common control). The Board did not intend to set
requirements for business combinations outside the scope of IFRS 3. Such
business combinations are the subject of a separate Board project.
Paragraphs BC327B‒BC327G and the headings above paragraphs BC327B and BC327E
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on insurance

contracts acquired in a transfer of insurance contracts or
in a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3
Classification as an insurance contract
BC327B Applying IFRS 4, an entity acquiring a contract in a business combination
determined whether that contract met the definition of an insurance contract
based on facts and circumstances at the date the contract was issued, instead
of the date of the business combination transaction (the acquisition date). This
requirement was an exception to the general principles in IFRS 3. In contrast,
entities applying IFRS 17 assess the classification of contracts using the
general principles in IFRS 3.
BC327C When considering feedback from entities implementing IFRS 17, the Board
considered but rejected a suggestion to reinstate that exception in IFRS 3 to
continue to apply when an entity applies IFRS 17 instead of IFRS 4.
BC327D By removing the exception described in paragraph BC327B, IFRS 17 makes the
accounting for the acquisition of insurance contracts consistent with the
accounting for acquisitions of other contracts acquired in a business
combination. Differences in accounting between an acquirer’s financial
statements and an acquiree’s financial statements can arise because of the
requirements in IFRS 3. Such differences reflect changes in facts and
circumstances at the acquisition date compared to facts and circumstances at
the date the acquiree recognised the contracts. Such differences depict the
economics of the acquisition, are not unique to insurance contracts and are
not unusual when applying IFRS Standards.

IFRS STANDARD
Contracts acquired in their settlement period

BC327E The Board also considered but rejected a suggestion to create an exception to
the general classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 17 for
contracts acquired in their settlement period. The Board concluded that an
entity that acquires a contract should, at the acquisition date, apply the
requirements for identifying whether a contract has an insured event and
meets the definition of an insurance contract—just as an entity that issues a
contract applies the requirements at the issue date.
BC327F An acquirer identifies assets and liabilities acquired based on the contractual
terms, rights and obligations and economic conditions at the acquisition date,
including the consideration to which the acquirer agreed at that date. The
Board noted that for a contract to meet the definition of an insurance contract
from the perspective of the acquirer at the acquisition date, the acquirer must
compensate the policyholder for the adverse effect of an uncertain future
event (that is, the acquirer must provide insurance coverage). If the acquirer
provides insurance coverage, the contract is an insurance contract accounted
for applying the requirements of IFRS 17. Contracts acquired in their
settlement period with claim amounts that are uncertain in timing or amount
could meet the definition of an insurance contract at the acquisition date.
BC327G The Board observed that some contracts acquired in their settlement period
will not meet the definition of an insurance contract at the acquisition date.
In some circumstances, all claim amounts are known at the acquisition date
but remain unpaid. In such circumstances, the acquirer is not providing
insurance coverage, the contract does not meet the definition of an insurance
contract and the acquirer would account for the contract as a financial
liability applying IFRS 3 and subsequently IFRS 9. The Board also observed that
for contracts that meet the definition of an insurance contract at the
acquisition date, an entity would need to consider whether any amounts
payable to the policyholder meet the definition of an investment component
(and are therefore excluded from insurance revenue).
Paragraphs BC327H‒BC327I and the heading above paragraph BC327H are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—assets for insurance

acquisition cash flows in a transfer of insurance
contracts and in a business combination within the scope
of IFRS 3 (paragraphs B95E‒B95F of IFRS 17)
BC327H In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity that acquires
insurance contracts in a transfer of insurance contracts that do not form a
business or in a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3 to recognise
an asset measured at fair value at the acquisition date for the rights to obtain:
(a) future insurance contracts that are renewals of insurance contracts

recognised at that date; and

(b) future insurance contracts, other than those in (a), after the
acquisition date without paying again insurance acquisition cash flows
the acquiree has already paid.
BC327I Requiring an entity to recognise such assets at the acquisition date is

consistent with the requirements in IFRS 17 for recognising an asset for
insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraph 28B of IFRS 17). As a result, the
contractual service margin for a group of insurance contracts recognised after
the acquisition date will appropriately reflect the rights relating to that future
group which the entity paid for as part of the consideration for the
acquisition. The Board decided that to achieve consistency between the
requirements at the acquisition date and after the acquisition date, an entity
should determine the rights described in paragraph BC327H(b) by reference to
insurance acquisition cash flows the acquiree has already paid. Otherwise,
broader rights to obtain future contracts from intangible assets such as
customer relationships, unconnected to any previously paid insurance
acquisition cash flows, could be included in the assets for insurance
acquisition cash flows and therefore subsequently included in the contractual
service margin of future groups of insurance contracts. In contrast, the Board
decided that such reference is unnecessary to determine the rights described
in paragraph BC327H(a)—these rights relate only to renewals, so they are
sufficiently constrained.
A footnote is added to the end of paragraphs BC328 and BC329. For ease of reading new
text is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to present

separately portfolios of insurance contracts that are assets and portfolios of
insurance contracts that are liabilities (see paragraphs BC330A‒BC330B).
Paragraphs BC330A‒BC330D and the headings above paragraphs BC330A and BC330C
Amendments to IFRS 17—presentation in the statement

of financial position
BC330A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to present
separately in the statement of financial position the carrying amount of
portfolios of insurance contracts issued that are assets and portfolios of
insurance contracts issued that are liabilities. Before the amendment, IFRS 17
required an entity to present separately groups of insurance contracts issued
that are assets and groups of insurance contracts issued that are liabilities (see
paragraph BC328). The amendment also applies to portfolios of reinsurance
contracts held.
BC330B The presentation requirement prior to the amendment was consistent with
the requirements for recognising and measuring groups of insurance
contracts. However, entities implementing IFRS 17 told the Board that they
would need to allocate some fulfilment cash flows to groups only for the
purpose of presentation (for example, fulfilment cash flows for incurred
claims). These entities said that an amendment to require an entity to present

IFRS STANDARD
insurance contracts at a portfolio level would provide significant operational

relief. Feedback on the 2019 Exposure Draft, including from users of financial
statements, suggested that the amendment would not significantly diminish
the usefulness of information compared to that which would have been
provided without the amendment.

BC330C Some stakeholders suggested the Board require an entity to present one
insurance contract asset or liability for all insurance contracts issued by the
entity (that is, present insurance contracts at an entity level). The Board
rejected that suggestion because such presentation would risk an
unacceptable loss of useful information for users of financial statements.
BC330D Some stakeholders suggested a different, more disaggregated approach to

presentation in the statement of financial position. Applying IFRS 4, some
entities presented separately in the statement of financial position different
amounts arising from an insurance contract, as if those different amounts
were separate assets or liabilities. For example, some entities presented an
insurance contract liability and line items labelled as premiums receivable,
claims payable and deferred acquisition costs. Entities differed in what line
items they presented and in the definitions of those line items. For example,
some entities presented amounts that were not yet billed as premiums
receivable whereas other entities presented only billed amounts that remain
outstanding. Some stakeholders said they would like to continue further
disaggregation because they view such disaggregated line items as providing
meaningful information to users of financial statements. The Board disagreed
with suggestions to permit an entity to continue such disaggregation because
it could result in the presentation of amounts that are not separable assets or
liabilities. For example, premiums receivable for future insurance coverage is
not a gross asset separable from the related liability for the future insurance
coverage.
underlined.

reflect the insurance contract services provided in that period (see
paragraph BC283H).
Paragraphs BC342A‒BC342C and the heading above paragraph BC342A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—insurance finance income or expenses

BC342A In June 2020, the Board amended paragraph B128 of IFRS 17 to clarify that
changes in the measurement of a group of insurance contracts resulting from
changes in underlying items are changes arising from the effect of the time
value of money and assumptions that relate to financial risk for the purposes
of IFRS 17. Otherwise, changes in underlying items could adjust the

contractual service margin of insurance contracts without direct participation

features. The Board considered a view that the effects of changes in cash flows
resulting from the participation in underlying items that are not solely
financial in nature (for example, insurance contracts) should be presented
within the insurance service result, instead of within insurance finance
income or expenses. The Board disagreed with this view because the
requirement to reflect changes from participation in underlying items in
insurance finance income or expenses appropriately depicts the nature of the
participation—as an investment. The Board concluded that policyholder
participation in underlying items, including underlying items that are not
solely financial in nature such as insurance contracts, should have no effect
on the depiction of the entity’s insurance service result. Further, splitting the
effect of changes in cash flows resulting from the participation in underlying
items that are not solely financial in nature into an amount that should be
included in the insurance service result and an amount that should be
included in insurance finance income or expenses would be complex and
could disrupt implementation for some entities.
BC342B Some users of financial statements were concerned that the requirements in
paragraphs 88‒89 of IFRS 17 for disaggregating insurance finance income or
expenses allow an accounting policy choice. They would rather IFRS 17
required one consistent presentation. The Board acknowledged that requiring
entities to report insurance finance income or expenses entirely in profit or
loss instead of permitting the choice in paragraphs 88−89 of IFRS 17 would
improve comparability between entities. However, consistent with the Board’s
previous conclusion explained in paragraph BC340, the Board concluded that
the presentation of insurance finance income or expenses as a systematic
allocation in profit or loss may provide more useful information than total
insurance finance income or expenses in profit or loss for some contracts and
less useful information for other contracts.
BC342C Some stakeholders said that accounting mismatches might arise between
financial assets the entity holds and insurance contract liabilities if an entity
were to apply the option in paragraph 88 of IFRS 17 to recognise some
insurance finance income or expenses in other comprehensive income. That
feedback led to no amendment because the Board noted that an entity can
avoid such mismatches by not applying the option. The Board received similar
feedback about accounting mismatches before IFRS 17 was issued (see
paragraphs BC53‒BC56).
...

IFRS STANDARD
Disclosure (paragraphs 93–132 of IFRS 17)

...
A footnote is added to the end of paragraph BC348(b)(iii). For ease of reading new text is
not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to correct the terminology used in
paragraphs 128‒129 of IFRS 17 by replacing ‘risk exposures’ with ‘risk
variables’.
BC349 In addition, when developing IFRS 17 the Board identified key items it views
as critical to understanding the financial statements of entities issuing
insurance contracts, in the light of the requirement to update the
measurement of insurance contracts at each reporting date. The Board
therefore decided that entities should disclose the following items:
...
(f) to the extent not already included in meeting the requirements in

paragraph 117(a) of IFRS 17, information about the entity’s approach
to determine (see paragraph 117(c) of IFRS 17):
...
(iv) investment components (see paragraphs BC33–BC34ABC34).
...
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to disclose when
it expects to recognise the contractual service margin remaining at the end of
the reporting period in profit or loss quantitatively, in appropriate time bands
(see paragraph BC366B).
A footnote is added to paragraph BC365 after ‘criteria in paragraph B116 are met.’. For
* In June 2020, the Board extended the risk mitigation option to be applicable
when an entity uses reinsurance contracts held or non-derivative financial
instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss to mitigate financial
risk (see paragraphs BC256A‒BC256F).

Paragraphs BC366A‒BC366C and the headings above paragraphs BC366A, BC366B and
BC366C are added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Amendments to IFRS 17—disclosure of amounts recognised
Insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraphs 105A‒105B and 109A of

IFRS 17)
BC366A In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to allocate
insurance acquisition cash flows to future groups of insurance contracts that
are expected to include contracts that are renewals of other contracts (see
paragraphs BC184A‒BC184K). That amendment extends the period for which
an asset for insurance acquisition cash flows exists, and therefore increases
the total amount of such assets at the end of each reporting period. In the
light of the amendment, the Board amended the disclosure requirements in
IFRS 17 to require an entity to disclose a reconciliation from the opening to
the closing balance of any asset for insurance acquisition cash flows
recognised applying paragraph 28B of IFRS 17. An entity is also required to
provide quantitative disclosure, in appropriate time bands, of the expected
inclusion of insurance acquisition cash flows recognised as an asset in the
measurement of the group of insurance contracts to which they are allocated
(see paragraph 105A of IFRS 17).
Recognition of the contractual service margin (paragraphs 109 and 117

of IFRS 17)
BC366B In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require an entity to determine the
quantity of benefits provided by an insurance contract considering either
investment-return service or investment-related service in addition to
insurance coverage (see paragraphs BC283A‒BC283J). That amendment adds
complexity and judgement to the determination of the quantity of benefits
provided by an insurance contract for the purpose of recognising the
contractual service margin in profit or loss. Accordingly, the Board decided to
require an entity to disclose:
(a) quantitative information, in appropriate time bands, about when the

entity expects to recognise in profit or loss the contractual service
margin remaining at the end of the reporting period (instead of
permitting an entity to provide only qualitative information); and
(b) the approach used to assess the relative weighting of the benefits from
insurance coverage and either investment-return service or
investment-related service.
Other additional disclosures

BC366C In June 2020, the Board also amended the disclosure requirements in IFRS 17
to clarify that an entity:
(a) is not required to disclose refunds of premiums separately from

investment components in the reconciliation required by
paragraph 100 of IFRS 17; and

IFRS STANDARD
(b) cannot present separately amounts relating to the risk adjustment for
non-financial risk that are experience adjustments applying paragraph
104(b)(iii) of IFRS 17 if the entity already discloses those amounts
applying paragraph 104(b)(ii) of IFRS 17 (to prevent double counting
those amounts).
...
Applying the Standard for the first time (Appendix C of IFRS 17)
...
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to permit an entity that has the
information to apply a fully retrospective approach to instead apply the fair
value approach for transition for a group of insurance contracts with direct
participation features when specified conditions relating to risk mitigation are
met (see paragraph BC393A).
BC373 The Board developed two alternative transition methods that may be used
when retrospective application is impracticable (see paragraphs BC379–
BC384BBC384 for the alternative transition method referred to as the
‘modified retrospective approach’ and paragraphs BC385–BC386 for the
alternative transition method referred to as the ‘fair value approach’). The
Board decided to permit an entity to choose between the modified
retrospective approach and the fair value approach if the entity cannot apply
IFRS 17 retrospectively. The Board acknowledged a choice of transition
methods results in a lack of comparability of transition amounts but
concluded it was appropriate for the following reasons. The objective of the
modified retrospective approach is to achieve the closest outcome to a
retrospective application of the Standard. The Board noted that the similarity
between a modified retrospective approach and a full retrospective application
would depend on the amount of reasonable and supportable information
available to an entity. If an entity has relatively little reasonable and
supportable information available and, therefore, would need to use many of
the permitted modifications, the cost of the modified retrospective approach
might exceed the benefits.

Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on transition

approaches
BC373A When the Board considered feedback from entities implementing IFRS 17, the
Board also considered feedback from users of financial statements that the
optionality in the transition requirements reduces comparability between
entities—in particular, the option to apply the modified retrospective
approach or the fair value approach. The Board concluded that the choices
provided are appropriate, for the reasons set out in paragraph BC373.
BC373B In the Board’s view, providing practical one-off reliefs to help entities with
their transition to IFRS 17 is worth a limited loss of comparability for a
limited period. The Board therefore decided not to reduce the options
available in the transition requirements, because doing so would be likely to
cause undue disruption to implementation already under way. The Board
noted the reduced comparability that the transition options cause has no
effect on the current value measurement of the fulfilment cash flows. The
Board also noted that entities are required to provide disclosures on the
transition approaches used. Such disclosures assist users of financial
statements in making comparisons between entities, and in understanding the
transition reliefs used and how those reliefs affect reported information.
is struck through.
Retrospective application (paragraphs C3–C5BC5 of

IFRS 17)
...
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to clarify that an entity recognises
and measures any assets for insurance acquisition cash flows as if IFRS 17 had
always applied, except that an entity is not required to assess the
recoverability of any such assets before the transition date (see paragraphs
BC184A‒BC184K).

IFRS STANDARD
Paragraph BC380 and the heading above paragraph BC379 are amended. New text is
Modified retrospective approach (paragraphs C6–

C19AC19 of IFRS 17)
...
BC380 The Board decided to specify some modifications that could be applied if
retrospective application as defined in IAS 8 is impracticable, to address the
issues noted in paragraph BC378. Those modifications are permitted only to
the extent necessary because an entity does not have reasonable and
supportable information to apply the retrospective approach. Those
modifications:
(a) simplify the information necessary for an entity to make assessments

about insurance contracts or groups of insurance contracts that would
be made at the date of inception or initial recognition (see paragraphs
BC381–BC382BBC382).
(b) simplify how an entity determines amounts related to the contractual

service margin (see paragraphs BC383‒BC383Bparagraph BC383).
(c) simplify how an entity determines the information necessary

to determine insurance revenue (see paragraphs BC383‒BC383B
paragraph BC383).
(d) permit an entity to determine insurance finance income and expenses

included in profit or loss using the discount rates at the transition date
if an entity chooses to disaggregate insurance finance income or
expenses into an amount included in profit or loss and an amount
included in other comprehensive income. In addition, the modification
provides an expedient for determining the amount of the accumulated
balance in equity relating to insurance finance income and expenses
(see paragraphs BC384‒BC384Bparagraph BC384).
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on using reasonable and

supportable information and making estimates
BC380A Some entities implementing IFRS 17 suggested that to provide operational
relief, the Board should remove from the modified retrospective approach the
requirements to:
(a) maximise the use of reasonable and supportable information available

without undue cost or effort that would have been used to apply a
fully retrospective approach.
(b) use reasonable and supportable information to apply the

modifications.

BC380B The Board considered but rejected the suggestions in paragraph BC380A
because:
(a) with regards to the suggestion in paragraph BC380A(a), permitting an

entity to ignore reasonable and supportable information available
without undue cost or effort that the entity would have used to apply a
fully retrospective approach would be contrary to the objective of the
modified retrospective approach. The objective is to achieve the closest
outcome to retrospective application possible using reasonable and
supportable information available without undue cost or effort. The
suggestion would also reduce comparability between contracts issued
before and after the transition date.
(b) with regards to the suggestion in paragraph BC380A(b), permitting an

entity to apply a modification when it does not have reasonable and
supportable information to do so would undermine the credibility of
information that results from applying IFRS 17. In the Board’s view,
applying a fair value approach would result in more useful
information for users of financial statements than would applying a
modified retrospective approach without the reasonable and
supportable information necessary to do so.
BC380C Some entities implementing IFRS 17 suggested that the inclusion of specified
modifications implies that an entity cannot make estimates in applying
IFRS 17 retrospectively. The Board noted that paragraph 51 of IAS 8
acknowledges the need for estimates in retrospective application. This
paragraph applies to entities applying IFRS 17 for the first time just as it does
to entities applying other IFRS Standards for the first time. The Board expects
that entities will often need to make estimates when applying a specified
modification in the modified retrospective approach.
BC380D Some stakeholders suggested that the Board could reduce the burden of
applying the transition requirements by specifying methods that could be
used—for example, methods using information from embedded value
reporting or information prepared for regulatory reporting. The Board
rejected this suggestion. The Board concluded that specifying methods would
conflict with the approach in IFRS 17 of establishing measurement objectives
that can be satisfied using various methods. The appropriateness of a method
depends on facts and circumstances. Furthermore, if the Board were to specify
methods, it could risk incorrectly implying that entities cannot use other
methods that would satisfy the requirements of IFRS 17.
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to permit an entity to assess

whether a contract meets the definition of an investment contract with
discretionary participation features either at the date of initial recognition of
the contract or at the transition date. This assessment is consistent with other
assessments described in paragraph BC382.

IFRS STANDARD
Amendments to IFRS 17—classification of contracts acquired in

their settlement period (paragraphs C9A and C22A of IFRS 17)
BC382A In June 2020, the Board considered but rejected a suggestion to create an
exception to the general classification and measurement requirements in
IFRS 17 for contracts acquired in their settlement period (see paragraphs
BC327E‒BC327G). However, the Board amended IFRS 17 to provide reliefs on
transition in response to feedback that to apply IFRS 17 retrospectively to
contracts acquired before the transition date (that is, to classify and measure
those contracts as a liability for remaining coverage) would often be
impracticable. Those reliefs permit an entity applying the modified
retrospective approach or the fair value approach to classify as a liability for
incurred claims a liability for the settlement of claims when:
(a) that liability relates to an insurance contract that was acquired in a

transfer of insurance contracts that do not form a business or in a
business combination within the scope of IFRS 3; and
(b) the acquisition date was before the transition date.
BC382B An entity applying the modified retrospective approach applies the relief in
paragraph BC382A only to the extent permitted by paragraph C8 of IFRS 17.
Amendments to IFRS 17—modifications considered but rejected

BC383A The Board considered a suggestion from entities implementing IFRS 17 to
permit an entity to develop the modifications that it thinks would achieve the
closest possible outcome to retrospective application. The Board disagreed
with this suggestion, because if such modifications were permitted:
(a) an entity could use modifications that would result in an outcome that
the Board would consider insufficiently close to retrospective
application; and
(b) each entity could use different modifications, reducing comparability

and increasing complexity for users of financial statements.
BC383B Paragraph C17 of IFRS 17 provides a modification for determining the

contractual service margin at the transition date for insurance contracts with
direct participation features. An entity applying that modification determines
the carrying amount of the contractual service margin at the transition date
in a more direct way than the entity would by applying the modifications in
paragraphs C11−C16 of IFRS 17 for determining the contractual service
margin at the transition date for insurance contracts without direct
participation features. An entity can determine the contractual service margin
in this more direct way because of the extent to which the contractual service
margin is remeasured for insurance contracts with direct participation

features. Some stakeholders suggested that an entity should be able to apply

the modifications in paragraphs C11−C16 of IFRS 17 to insurance contracts
with direct participation features. The Board disagreed with this suggestion
because applying those modifications to such contracts would be unlikely to
achieve an outcome as close to retrospective application as would applying
paragraph C17 of IFRS 17.
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback relating to the accumulated

balance recognised in other comprehensive income
BC384A Some entities implementing IFRS 17 said they would prefer alternative
modifications to the modifications set out in paragraphs C18‒C19 of IFRS 17
for determining the amount of insurance finance income or expenses
accumulated in other comprehensive income at the transition date. These
entities suggested that for all insurance contracts (insurance contracts with
and without direct participation features), an entity should be required to:
(a) deem as nil the accumulated amount in other comprehensive income

for financial assets accounted for applying IFRS 9 that are related to
insurance contracts; or
(b) deem the accumulated amount of insurance finance income or

expenses in other comprehensive income as equal to the accumulated
amount in other comprehensive income arising on financial assets
accounted for applying IFRS 9 that are related to insurance contracts.
BC384B The Board considered but rejected the suggestions in paragraph BC384A
because:
(a) both suggested amendments involve significant subjectivity in

determining which assets relate to insurance contracts.
(b) both suggested amendments could result in an outcome that the Board
would consider to be insufficiently close to retrospective application of
IFRS 17 requirements.
(c) the suggested amendment to IFRS 9 described in BC384A(a) would

reduce comparability of entities first applying IFRS 9 and IFRS 17 at the
same time choosing this approach with other entities that have already
applied IFRS 9. The Board noted that the amount accumulated in other
comprehensive income relating to financial assets measured at fair
value through other comprehensive income includes amounts that
relate to expected credit losses. Hence, setting the cumulative amount
to nil on transition would affect the accounting for expected credit
losses in future periods.
(d) the suggested amendment to IFRS 17 described in BC384A(b) would

mean that insurance finance income or expenses recognised in profit
or loss in future periods would reflect the historical discount rate for
assets held at the transition date that an entity determines are related

IFRS STANDARD
to insurance contracts. The Board concluded that using that historical

discount rate could result in a significant loss of useful information,
because of the subjectivity in determining which assets relate to
insurance contracts and because comparability for insurance contracts
would be reduced between entities that hold different assets.
is struck through.
Fair value approach (paragraphs C20–C24BC24 of

IFRS 17)
...
underlined.
* An entity applying the fair value approach is permitted to classify as a liability

for incurred claims a liability for the settlement of claims incurred before an
insurance contract was acquired in a transfer of insurance contracts that do
not form a business or in a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3
(see paragraph BC382A).
Paragraph BC389A is added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Comparative information (paragraphs C25–C28 of

IFRS 17)
...
BC389A In June 2020, the Board deferred the effective date of IFRS 17 from 1 January
2021 to 1 January 2023 (see paragraphs BC404A‒BC404F). The Board
considered but rejected a suggestion to provide relief from the restatement of
comparative information, because the Board concluded that restatement of
comparative information is particularly important given the diversity in
previous accounting practices and the extent of change introduced by IFRS 17.
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on applying the level of

aggregation requirements on transition
BC392A In the modified retrospective approach, an entity is permitted to group
together contracts that were issued more than one year apart, to the extent
that the entity does not have reasonable and supportable information to
separately group those contracts—in other words, the entity is permitted not
to apply the annual cohort requirement in paragraph 22 of IFRS 17. In the fair
value approach, an entity is permitted a choice to group together contracts
that were issued more than one year apart. Some stakeholders suggested the
Board provide further relief by permitting an entity a choice to group together
contracts issued more than one year apart in a fully retrospective approach

and in the modified retrospective approach, regardless of whether the entity

has reasonable and supportable information to apply the annual cohort
requirement. The Board disagreed with the suggestion for such transition
relief because permitting an entity not to apply the annual cohort
requirement:
(a) when the entity has the information available to apply a fully
retrospective approach would have the effect that the entity would not
be applying a fully retrospective approach; and
(b) when the entity has reasonable and supportable information to apply
that requirement in the modified retrospective approach would be
inconsistent with the objective of the modified retrospective approach.
A footnote is added to the end of the first sentence of paragraph BC393 and to the end of
the heading above paragraph BC393. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board extended the risk mitigation option to be applicable
when an entity uses reinsurance contracts held and non-derivative financial
instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss to mitigate financial
risk (see paragraphs BC256A‒BC256F).
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17 to require prospective application of

the risk mitigation option from the transition date instead of the date of
initial application (see paragraph BC393A).
Paragraphs BC393A‒BC393E and the heading above paragraph BC393A are added. For
Amendments to IFRS 17—the prohibition from applying the risk

mitigation option retrospectively (paragraphs C3(b) and C5A of IFRS 17)
BC393A In June 2020, the Board amended the transition requirements relating to the
risk mitigation option to:
(a) permit an entity to apply the risk mitigation option in paragraph B115
of IFRS 17 prospectively from the transition date instead of the date of
initial application; and
(b) permit an entity that can apply IFRS 17 retrospectively to a group of

insurance contracts to instead apply the fair value approach if, and
only if:
(i) the entity chooses to apply the risk mitigation option to the
group prospectively from the transition date; and

IFRS STANDARD
(ii) before the transition date, the entity had been using
derivatives, reinsurance contracts held or non-derivative
financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or
loss to mitigate financial risk arising from the group of
BC393B The amendments described in paragraph BC393A respond to concerns that

prohibiting retrospective application of the risk mitigation option reduces
comparability between risk mitigation activities that took place before the
date of initial application and those that take place after that date. Most
stakeholders agreed with the Board that the amendments described in
paragraph BC393A resolve these concerns.
BC393C Nonetheless, some stakeholders suggested the Board amend IFRS 17 to permit
retrospective application of the risk mitigation option, and so the Board
considered whether it should make such an amendment. The Board observed
that if an entity were permitted to apply the option retrospectively, it could
decide the extent to which it reflects risk mitigation activities in the
contractual service margin based on known accounting outcomes. The entity
could apply the option in a way that differs from how the entity would have
applied the option in previous periods without hindsight, had it always
applied IFRS 17. Permitting retrospective application of the option would
therefore affect the credibility of information presented on transition to
IFRS 17 and in subsequent periods in which those groups of insurance
contracts exist. The Board therefore reaffirmed its decision to prohibit
retrospective application of the option because of the risk of the use of
hindsight.
BC393D Some stakeholders suggested the Board amend IFRS 17 to permit an entity to
apply the risk mitigation option retrospectively if, and only if, the entity
applies the option for all risk mitigation relationships that would meet the
conditions in paragraphs B115‒B116 of IFRS 17 (an ‘all or nothing’ approach).
These stakeholders thought such an amendment would avoid the risk of
hindsight. The Board considered what an ‘all or nothing’ approach would be
and whether the Board should add such an approach to the IFRS 17 transition
requirements. The Board noted that an ‘all or nothing’ approach would
require:
(a) ‘all’ to mean all insurance contracts issued by the entity that exist at
the transition date (that is, all would be at a reporting entity level);
(b) ‘all’ to mean all past and current risk mitigation relationships that
meet the criteria in paragraph B116 of IFRS 17 at any point between
initial recognition of a group of insurance contracts and the transition
date;
(c) an entity to hold historical documentation of each of those risk

mitigation relationships described in (b), and that documentation to
have existed at the beginning of the first reporting period that the
entity would have met the criteria in paragraph B116 of IFRS 17; and

(d) an entity to retrospectively determine the effect of applying the risk

mitigation option for all relationships described in (b) at each reporting
date between initial recognition of a group of insurance contracts and
the transition date.
BC393E The Board noted that any approach other than the one described in
paragraph BC393D would involve the risk of hindsight. The approach
described in paragraph BC393D would not involve the risk of hindsight.
However, the Board concluded that applying that approach would be
impracticable in almost all cases. Meeting the conditions necessary for an ‘all
or nothing’ approach would be a high hurdle that entities would overcome in
only a narrow set of circumstances. Accordingly, the Board decided not to add
those requirements to IFRS 17.
Paragraphs BC398A‒BC398F and the headings above paragraphs BC398A and BC398C
Amendments to IFRS 17—feedback on redesignation of financial assets

BC398A The Board considered but rejected a suggestion from entities implementing
IFRS 17 that on initial application of IFRS 17 an entity that:
(a) first applied IFRS 9 before IFRS 17 be permitted to apply the transition
relief in paragraph C29 of IFRS 17 to redesignate financial assets that
were derecognised during the IFRS 17 comparative period; and
(b) first applied IFRS 9 at the same time it first applied IFRS 17 be
permitted to apply IFRS 9 to financial assets that were derecognised
during the IFRS 17 comparative period.
BC398B The Board extensively discussed and consulted on the requirements in IFRS 9
relating to transition when IFRS 9 was being developed. Such requirements
include prohibiting an entity from applying IFRS 9 to derecognised items, and
permitting but not requiring an entity to restate comparative periods in some
circumstances.
Amendments to IFRS 17—transition requirements when an entity

chooses to apply IFRS 9 to contracts specified in paragraph 8A of
IFRS 17 (paragraphs 7.2.36‒7.2.42 of IFRS 9)
BC398C Some entities will first apply IFRS 17 after they first apply IFRS 9. In June
2020, the Board amended IFRS 9 to provide transition requirements for such
entities that apply paragraph 8A of IFRS 17 and choose to apply IFRS 9 to
insurance contracts that limit the compensation for insured events to the
amount otherwise required to settle the policyholder’s obligation created by
the contract (see paragraphs BC94D‒BC94F). The amendment enables those
entities to use the transition requirements in Section 7.2 of IFRS 9 (as issued in
2014) when first applying IFRS 9 to those contracts.
BC398D The Board also considered transition requirements related to the fair value
option in IFRS 9. An entity’s decision to apply IFRS 9 to insurance contracts
that limit the compensation for insured events to the amount otherwise
required to settle the policyholder’s obligation created by the contract could

IFRS STANDARD
change, either partially or in full, the classification and measurement of such

contracts. Such changes may create or eliminate accounting mismatches
between the contracts and financial liabilities an entity might consider to be
related to the contracts. Therefore, the Board amended the IFRS 9 transition
requirements to permit an entity to designate, or require an entity to revoke
its previous designation of, a financial liability at the date of initial application
of these amendments to the extent that a new accounting mismatch is
created, or a previous accounting mismatch no longer exists, as a result of the
application of these amendments.
BC398E Consistent with the transition requirements in IFRS 9 and IFRS 17, the Board
decided to specify that when an entity applies the amendment described in
paragraph BC398C and chooses to apply IFRS 9 to such contracts, the entity:
(a) can choose to restate prior periods to reflect the effect of applying
these amendments only if the entity can do so without the use of
hindsight and if the restated financial statements reflect all the
requirements in IFRS 9 for the affected financial instruments;
(b) will be required to disclose information about the changes in the

classification and measurement of contracts as a result of applying
these amendments in addition to any disclosures required by other
IFRS Standards; and
(c) can choose to not disclose the quantitative information otherwise

required by paragraph 28(f) of IAS 8 for the current period or any prior
period presented.
BC398F The Board added these transition requirements as a consequence of adding

paragraph 8A to the requirements of IFRS 17 (see paragraph BC398C). In June
2020, the Board also added a scope exclusion in paragraph 7(h) of IFRS 17 for
some contracts that provide credit or payment arrangements such as
particular credit card contracts (see paragraphs BC94A‒BC94C). Stakeholders
said that, for such contracts, many entities already apply IFRS 9 to the credit
or payment arrangement component applying the separation requirements in
IFRS 4. However, some may not have. Accordingly, the transition
requirements discussed in paragraphs BC398A‒BC398E will apply if an entity
has already applied IFRS 9 but has not applied IFRS 9 to those components.
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board deferred the effective date of IFRS 17 by two years to
require entities to apply IFRS 17 for annual reporting periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2023 (see paragraphs BC404A‒BC404F).

Amendments to IFRS 17—deferral of the effective date

BC404A In June 2020, the Board deferred the effective date of IFRS 17 by two years to
require entities to apply IFRS 17 for annual reporting periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2023.
BC404B In the 2019 Exposure Draft, the Board proposed a one-year deferral of the
effective date to balance:
(a) providing certainty about the effective date considering the

uncertainty caused by the Board’s decision in October 2018 to explore
possible amendments to IFRS 17 (see paragraphs BC6A–BC6C); and
(b) requiring IFRS 17 implementation as soon as possible because:
(i) IFRS 17 is a Standard urgently needed to address many

inadequacies in previous accounting practices for insurance
contracts; and
(ii) undue delay in the effective date of the Standard may increase
workload and costs, particularly for entities that are advanced
in their implementation projects.
BC404C Feedback on the 2019 Exposure Draft generally supported the proposed
deferral of the effective date. Some stakeholders, particularly users of
financial statements and regulators, expressed concern about any deferral of
the effective date beyond one year, but other stakeholders suggested a longer
deferral was necessary.
BC404D Some stakeholders said a longer deferral was necessary because some entities
required more time to implement IFRS 17, for example because of challenges
in developing systems and determining appropriate accounting policies, and
because of the effect on implementation projects already under way of the
amendments proposed in the 2019 Exposure Draft. The Board acknowledged
that implementing IFRS 17 is a major undertaking. However, it noted that it
had allowed an implementation period of three and a half years when it
issued IFRS 17. Furthermore, given that IFRS 17 is urgently needed, the Board
thought that a year’s deferral of the effective date as proposed in the 2019
Exposure Draft ought to be sufficient to allow for the effects of any disruption
caused by amending the Standard before its effective date. The Board was
careful to propose only targeted amendments and not to reopen fundamental
aspects of the Standard. The Board acknowledged, however, that
implementing the Standard by 2022, as proposed in the 2019 Exposure Draft,
would be demanding, in particular for smaller insurers.
BC404E Some stakeholders suggested a longer deferral was necessary to ensure that
the initial application of IFRS 17 would be aligned in major markets around
the world. These stakeholders were uncertain whether such an alignment
would occur if the Board confirmed a one-year deferral. They commented on
uncertainties and delays in jurisdictional endorsement and adoption processes

IFRS STANDARD
and the consequential uncertainty about the effective dates that might be set
in some jurisdictions. The Board noted that it had set the effective date of
IFRS 17 so that jurisdictions would have sufficient time to adopt the new
Standard. However, the Board acknowledged that considering amendments to
the Standard before its effective date inevitably caused some disruption to
those processes. The Board noted that the initial application of IFRS 17 will
significantly affect insurers’ financial statements and acknowledged that users
of financial statements would benefit if the initial application of IFRS 17 were
aligned around the world.
BC404F Accordingly, although the Board was aware of the costs of delaying the
implementation of IFRS 17, particularly for users of financial statements, the
Board decided to defer the effective date by two years to annual reporting
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. The Board concluded that a two-
year deferral should allow time for an orderly adoption of the amended
IFRS 17 by jurisdictions. It should therefore enable more entities to initially
apply IFRS 17 around the same time for the benefit of users of financial
statements. The additional year’s deferral compared to that proposed in the
2019 Exposure Draft should also assist those entities for whom implementing
IFRS 17 by 2022 would have been challenging, including those entities for
whom implementation projects were affected by the covid-19 pandemic in
2020. The deferral should thereby help to improve the quality of the initial
application of the Standard.
underlined.
* In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17. The reference to IFRS 15 in
paragraph C1 of IFRS 17 was deleted, because IFRS 15 was effective at the time
the June 2020 amendments were issued.

Appendix A
Summary of changes since the 2013 Exposure Draft
A footnote is added to ‘The following table summarises the main differences between the
2013 Exposure Draft and IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts.’ For ease of reading new text is
not underlined.
* This appendix compares IFRS 17 as issued in May 2017 with the 2013 Exposure
Draft. In June 2020, the Board amended IFRS 17. A list summarising the June
2020 amendments, including references to the relevant paragraphs of this
Basis for Conclusions, is included in Appendix C.

IFRS STANDARD
Appendix C is added. For ease of reading new text is not underlined.
Appendix C
List of amendments issued in 2020
Table C lists the main amendments to IFRS 17 issued in June 2020 with a reference to the
rationale for those amendments included in this Basis for Conclusions (see paragraphs
BC6A‒BC6C).
The Board also:
(a) made minor amendments to correct cases in which the drafting of IFRS 17 did not
achieve the Board’s intended outcome; and
(b) considered but rejected other amendments suggested by stakeholders—for

example, suggestions to amend the annual cohort requirement (see paragraphs
BC139A‒BC139T).
Table C Main amendments to IFRS 17 issued in June 2020

Area of amendment Paragraphs in Basis for
Conclusions on IFRS 17
Scope exclusions—credit card contracts and similar contracts BC94A–BC94C
that provide credit or payment arrangements
Scope exclusions—specified contracts such as loan contracts BC94D–BC94F
with death waivers
Insurance acquisition cash flows BC184A–BC184K
BC327H–BC327I
The effect of accounting estimates made in interim financial BC236A–BC236D
statements
Risk mitigation option using instruments other than derivatives BC256A–BC256F
Contractual service margin attributable to investment-return BC283A–BC283J
service and investment-related service
Reinsurance contracts—recovery of losses on underlying BC315A–BC315L
insurance contracts
Presentation in the statement of financial position BC330A–BC330D
Applying the Standard for the first time—classification of BC382A–BC382B
contracts acquired in their settlement period
Applying the Standard for the first time—the prohibition from BC393A–BC393E
applying the risk mitigation option retrospectively
Applying the Standard for the first time—deferral of the BC404A–BC404F
effective date

IAS®
International Financial Reporting Standards® IFRIC®
IFRS Foundation® SIC®
IFRS® IASB®
Contact the IFRS Foundation for details of countries where its trade marks are in use or have been registered.
The International Accounting Standards Board is the

independent standard-setting body of the IFRS Foundation
Columbus Building | 7 Westferry Circus | Canary Wharf

London E14 4HD | United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7246 6410
Email: [email protected] | Web: www.ifrs.org
Publications Department
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7332 2730
Email: [email protected]

Enmienda IFRS 17 IFRS2020 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Enmienda IFRS 17 IFRS2020 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Enmienda IFRS 17 IFRS2020 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

June 2020

Copyright © 2020 IFRS Foundation

Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts

4 All references in IFRS 17 to insurance contracts also apply to:

(a) reinsurance contracts held, except:

(ii) as described in paragraphs 60–70A70.

7 An entity shall not apply IFRS 17 to:

(h) credit card contracts, or similar contracts that provide credit or

Separating components from an insurance contract

(b) separate from a host insurance contract an investment component if,

12 After applying paragraph 11 to separate any cash flows related to embedded

Level of aggregation of insurance contracts

Paragraph 27 is deleted and paragraph 28 is amended. Paragraphs 28A–28F and the

(a) the beginning of the coverage period of the group of contracts;

27 [Deleted]An entity shall recognise an asset or liability for any insurance

28 In recognising a group of insurance contracts in a reporting period, an entity

Insurance acquisition cash flows (paragraphs B35A‒

28D If paragraph 28 applies, an entity shall apply paragraphs 28B‒28C in

28F An entity shall recognise in profit or loss a reversal of some or all of an

Measurement (paragraphs B36–B119FB119)

(b) for groups of reinsurance contracts held, an entity shall apply

Measurement on initial recognition (paragraphs B36–

Estimates of future cash flows (paragraphs B36–B71)

(b) both of the following criteria are satisfied:

Contractual service margin

(c)(b) the derecognition at the date of initial recognition of:

(i) any asset or liability recognised for insurance acquisition

(ii) any other asset or liability previously recognised for cash

39 For insurance contracts acquired in a transfer of insurance contracts or in a

Contractual service margin (paragraphs B96–B119BB119)

(e) the amount recognised as insurance revenue because of the transfer of

45 For insurance contracts with direct participation features (see paragraphs

(ii) the decrease in the amount of the entity’s share of a decrease in

(iii) the increase in the amount of the entity’s share of an increase

(e) the amount recognised as insurance revenue because of the transfer of

48 A group of insurance contracts becomes onerous (or more onerous) on

(a) unfavourable changes relating to future service in the fulfilment cash

(b) for a group of insurance contracts with direct participation features,

Applying paragraphs 44(c)(i), 45(b)(ii) and 45(c)(ii), an entity shall recognise a

50 After an entity has recognised a loss on an onerous group of insurance

(i) any subsequent decrease relating to future service in fulfilment

(ii) any subsequent increases in the amount of the entity’s share

Applying paragraphs 44(c)(ii), 45(b)(iii) and 45(c)(iii), an entity shall

Premium allocation approach

(a) on initial recognition, the carrying amount of the liability is:

(iii) plus or minus any amount arising from the derecognition at

1. any asset for insurance acquisition cash flows applying

2. any other asset or liability previously recognised for

(v) minus the amount recognised as insurance revenue for

56 If insurance contracts in the group have a significant financing component, an

Reinsurance contracts held

(a) the beginning of the coverage period of the group of reinsurance

(b) the date the entity recognises an onerous group of underlying

62A Notwithstanding paragraph 62(a), an entity shall delay the recognition of a

62 Instead of applying paragraph 25, an entity shall recognise a group of

(a) if the reinsurance contracts held provide proportionate coverage—at

65 The requirements of paragraph 38 that relate to determining the contractual

(a) the fulfilment cash flows;,

(b) the amount derecognised at that date of any asset or liability