Mistah Kurtz-He Dead. A Penny For The Old Guy
Mistah Kurtz-He Dead. A Penny For The Old Guy
Mistah Kurtz-He Dead. A Penny For The Old Guy
I
We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats' feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar
The epigraphs of the poem- Mistah Kurtz — he dead, and A penny for the Old Guy 79 reflect
the ‘lost violent souls’80 of Kurtz and Guy Fawkes. Eliot brought these characters into this
poem to reflect the sense of what ‘lost violent souls’ mean in the poem. Eliot tries to show the
state of the life of hollow men by comparing them with lost violent souls. The hollow men
are not lost violent souls. They are not capable of any good or bad deeds. The lost violent
souls are those souls condemned in hell for their bad deeds. They are at least capable of evil
actions. The first epigraph, Mistah Kurtz - he dead, is an allusion to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of
Darkness. In the novel, Conrad portrays the empty nature of man through the life of Kurtz.
Mr Kurtz, a German, travels to Congo in Africa to trade slave. Instead, he lost his senses and
exploited the natives. He tyrannized over the African natives and meets his death
unknowingly in the African wilderness. Kurtz, using idealism to rationalize murder and other
such heinous crimes, is the prototypical "hollow" man. (Willard.2000) So, he is one of the
lost violent souls condemned in hell. Guy Fawkes is a real character in English history. In
1605, Guy Fawkes unsuccessfully tried to blow up the Parliament building. But the plan was
foiled and Guy Fawkes was arrested. Later, he was condemned to death. Since then, every
year on the fifth day of November, children make effigies of Guy Fawkes and beg money to
buy fire crackers. The effigies are then burnt with fireworks. Eliot has portrayed him in the
poem to show that he is also one of the lost violent souls. At the same time, the effigy of Guy
Fawkes represents the spiritual emptiness in the life of the hollow men. The epitaph character
works to depict the poet’s thought in an objective manner for it stands for something
meaningful. “It sets up a natural contrast to the hollowness of Modern man, who
fundamentally believes in nothing and is, therefore, empty at the core of his being, like a Guy
Fawkes dummy.” (Brothers Judd. 1998)
Toward heaven, till the tree could bear no more,/ But dipped its top and set me down again./
That would be good both going and coming back./ One could do worse than be a swinger of
birches.
“’Toward heaven’ but never to, never all the way, Frost fears transcendence. Despite all the
apparent moralizing (‘earth’s the right place for love’), this passage is one of the most
skeptical in Frost. He contemplates a moment when the soul may become completely
absorbed into a union with the divine. But he is earthbound, limited, afraid. No sooner does
he wish to get away from earth than he thinks of ‘fate’-- rather than God. And what might be
a mystical experience turns into a fear of death, a fear that he would be snatched away ‘not to
return.’ He rejects the unknown, the love of God, because he cannot know it, and he clings to
the finite: ‘Earth's the right place for love’.” Floyd C. Watkins/ “Going and Coming Back:
Robert Frost’s Religious Poetry” South Atlantic Quarterly 6 (Autumn 1974)
“Frost begins to probe the power of his redemptive imagination as it moves from its playful
phase toward the brink of dangerous transcendence. The movement into transcendence is a
movement into a realm of radical imaginative freedom where (because redemption has
succeeded too well) all possibilities of engagement with the common realities of experience
are dissolved. In its moderation, a redemptive consciousness motivates union between selves
as we have seen in ‘The Generations of Men,’ or in any number of Frost’s love poems. But in
its extreme forms, redemptive consciousness can become self-defeating as it presses the
imaginative man into deepest isolation.
For Frost, however, and for any poet who is rooted in what I call the aesthetics of the fiction,
the simile is the perfect figure of comparison, subtler even than metaphor. Its overtness
becomes its virtue: in its insistence on the disparateness of the things compared (as well as
their likeness) it can sustain a divided vision; can at once transmute the birches--for a brief
moment Nature stands humanized and the poet has transcended the scientific universe--and,
at the same time, can allow the fictive world to be penetrated by the impurities of experience
that resist the trans-mutative process of imagination.
The shrewdness in Frost’s strategy now surfaces. While claiming to have paid homage to the
rigid standards of empirical truth in his digression on the ice-loaded branches, what he has
actually done is to digress into the language of fictions. When he turns to the desired vision of
the young boy swinging birches, he is not, as he says, turning from truth to fiction, but from
one kind of fiction to another kind of fiction: from the fiction of cosmic change and
humanized nature to the fiction of the human will riding roughshod over a pliable external
world. And the motives for all of this fooling? I think there are two: one is that Frost intends
to fox his naturalistically persuaded readers; a second is that this is what his poem is all
about--the thrusting of little fictions within alien, anti-fictive contexts. As he evokes the
image of the boy, playing in isolation, too far from the community to engage in a team kind
of sport, he evokes, as well, his cherished theme of the imaginative man who, essentially
alone in the world, either makes it or doesn’t on the strength of his creative resources. And
now he indulges to the full the desired vision that he could not allow himself in the poem’s
opening lines… One figure seems to imply another--the image of the farm youth swinging
up, out, and down to earth again recalls the boyhood of the poet….
For anyone but Frost the ‘pathless wood’ is trite. But for him it carries a complex of meaning
fashioned elsewhere. The upward swinging of the boy becomes an emblem for imagination’s
swing away from the tangled, dark wood; a swing away from the ‘straighter, darker trees’; a
swing into the absolute freedom of isolation, the severing of all ‘considerations.’ This is the
transcendental phase of redemptive consciousness, a game that one plays alone. The
downward movement of redemptive imagination to earth, contrarily, is a movement into
community, engagement, love--the games that two play together….
One really has no choice but to be a swinger of birches. In the moment when, catapulting
upward, the poet is half-granted his wish, when transcendence is about to be complete and the
self, in its disdain for earth, has lofted itself into absolute autonomy, nothing having any
claim upon it, and no return possible, then, at that moment,, the blessed pull of the earth is
felt again, and the apocalypse desired by a transcending imagination, which seemed so
imminent, is repressed. At the end of ‘Birches’ a precious balance has been restored between
the claims of a redeeming imagination in its extreme, transcendent form, and the claims of
common-sense reality. To put it in another way, the psychic needs of change--supplied best
by redemptive imagination--are balanced by the equally deep psychic need--supplied by
sceptical ironic awareness--for the therapy of dull realities and everyday considerations.”
Frank Lentricchia/ Robert Frost: Modern Poetics and the Landscapes of Self (Duke 1975)
Such a return or reconciliation would, for Blake or Shelley, amount to surrender. But Frost,
like most other American nature writers, does not posit Blake’s or Shelley’s kind of
inevitable struggle to the death between imaginative perception and natural fact. Like
Thoreau (with certain exceptions), like Emerson in his more restrained moods, Frost believes
that, in the final analysis, the two forces are capable of cooperating to achieve meaning.”
George F. Bagby/ Frost and the Book of Nature (U Tennessee 1993)
In the writings that we have read so far, we have frequently seen the intense pressures and
tensions that the Civil War forged in Whitman’s work, often leaving him with no recourse but
to celebrate his oxymoronic reactions to the mix of “sweetness” and “sadness” he found in
his war experiences, or the blend of beauty and horror, love and death, he experienced in the
war hospitals. This 1865 poem embodies another of those irresolvable tensions—the way the
war made Whitman want to escape to a solitary rural retreat far from the urban space he
inhabited, with its continual noise and incessant reminders of the war, and the way the war
simultaneously made him want to even more fully embrace the militarized city and its
raucous sociability. Oddly, he feels an equally strong pull toward silence and noise, toward
“solitude” and “faces and streets,” and he is drawn toward composing his own “spontaneous
songs” written “for my ears only” at the same time that he wants to record and broadcast the
“strong voices, passions, pageants” and the very public “powerful throbs” of “Manhattan
streets.”
The mood of the writer changes in the second part of poem which is the praise of city life that
keep your splendid silent sun. he is so deeply routed in city life that he was accustomed of the
habitat of city. If someone is away from city life he is just like a fish out of water. He loves
and adores the busting life of Manhattan. There is hustle and bustle in the city life. The poet
did not wants that blessings and beauties of nature. He tells that villagers can keep everything
by their own selves and did not give to anybody. He loves the crowded scenes of Manhattan
of America where streets are thronging with people and thickly appreciated. They rub
shoulders to each other while passing from any street. He is in habit of interaction of men and
women. He wanted pavements of cities rather than footpaths of village. He is of the view that
those who are in habit of city life would not adjust in village life. He wanted those eyes
which are countless in large number. He was accustomed to the city life where he wanted
moral liberal society. He wishes to live in that place where people can change their partners.
He had longings for sexual appetites. People living in city wants change. He desires for the
sound of trumpets and drums of soldiers. He wanted life full of charm, solitude and repletion.
Having bar rooms, huge hotels, dancing clubs and saloons on ship. At night torch-light
procession was held which is another mean of heavy traffic which creates rush and make city
noisy. The people wounded by rustle was also seen in Manhattan and chorus was varied. He
loves every part of Manhattan and he is devoted to it. In fact he is idol worshipper
of Manhattan. As city was known for its ostentations and artificiality so he is in praises of this
city. At the end he wants all the things of Manhattan and he never leave it.