Iron Core Vs Air Core

Iron-Core Versus Air-Core Harmonic Filter Reactors
Introduction
At the medium voltage level, 2.4kV through 13.8kV, harmonic filters are often designed,
specified, and manufactured with either Iron-core or Air-core reactors. The preference
for one reactor over the other may be from experience, familiarity, misconception, or
some good technical reason. This document should help in presenting the major
differences and benefits that exist between these two types of reactors.
Background
Figure one shows the physical characteristics of typical Iron-Core and Air-Core reactors
utilized in harmonic filters. Iron core reactors usually consist of a copper winding wound
around an iron core that has an air gap. The number of winding turns, area of the air
gap, and length of the gap, determine the reactors inductance. Due to the high
permeability of iron, the magnetic field is confined to the core, and the inductance of
the reactor is accomplished with a low number of turns. The iron-core may be put at
either line or ground potential. At line potential, the core would be supported on post
insulators and the voltage gradient between the core and the winding would be
minimal. When the iron-core is at ground potential, the winding-to-core insulation must
be rated for the line potential.
Figure 1 - Typical iron-core and air-core reactor designs
The air-core reactor consists of either an aluminum or copper winding wound around
and supported by an aluminum structure. The aluminum structure is typically floated at
line potential with post insulators to minimize insulation requirements and cost. The air-
core reactors inductance is primarily determined by the number of turns, height, and
diameter of the reactor. It is usually large and consists of many turns as compared to
and iron-core reactor with equal inductance. Since there is no iron, the stray magnetic
field is quite high and it should be accounted for in the early stages of a harmonic filter
design.
The type of reactor used typically determines the harmonic filter layout. Figure 2 shows
how the type of reactor changes the physical characteristic and design of the filter. Air
core reactors are typically associated with rack mounted capacitor banks and are
mainly placed in substations. Iron-core reactors are usually placed inside enclosures
which may be rated for indoor or outdoor locations.
Figure 2 - Typical Iron-Core and Air-Core Filter Designs
Filter Performance
Issues
The question often arises over which reactor is superior for harmonic filter applications.
Table 1 should help to answer this question. The table shows that there are both benefits
and draw backs to both types of reactors. The major issues in regards to harmonic filters
is primarily limited to stray magnetic fields, saturation, harmonic current rating and
space requirements.
Stray Magnetic Fields

Air-core reactors have high stray magnetic fields. These fields may interfere with other
power system equipment, produce eddy currents (which may cause heating) in nearby
steel structures, and present a health hazard to people with pace makers and other
medical devices. These problems may be reduced or eliminated by providing enough
clearance around the reactor. Where real-estate is an issue, 3/8" aluminum plates may
be placed around the reactors (floor, ceiling, and even sides) to reduce external fields.
Eddy currents can also be reduced by providing isolation (effectively breaking the
current paths). In any case, the solution to stray magnetic fields may increase the cost
of the installation. The reactor manufacturer should be consulted, and informed of
nearby conducting bodies, since they may have an effect on the reactors inductance.
Table 1 - Comparison of Iron and Air Core Reactors
Table 1 – Comparison of Iron and Air Core Reactors

Iron Core Air Core
Can saturate Do not saturate
Low stray magnetic field High stray magnetic field
Compact, low space requirements Large space requirements
Core must be designed for peak harmonic Winding must be designed for RMS current
current (sum of individual harmonic
currents) and winding must be designed
for RMS current.
Higher weight Lower weight
More likely to release audible noise if not Less likely to release audible noise if not
properly constructed properly constructed
Vendor comparison more difficult Vendor comparison simpler
Low number of turns in the winding High number of turns in the winding
Simple to enclose Difficult to enclose due to eddy current
heating from stray magnetic fields
Saturation
Saturation is problem inherent in Iron-core reactors. The amount of flux, or flux density,
that an iron-core reactor can carry is limited, and is dependent upon its cross-sectional
area. The higher the cross-sectional area, the higher the amount of flux it can carry. The
flux density is directly related to the peak current that the reactor will carry, which can
be as high as the fundamental peak current plus the sum of the individual peak
harmonic currents. This is seldom the case, but would lead to a very conservative
reactor design. Less conservative designs assume a coincidence factor, which defines
the peak current as a percentage of the sum of the harmonic peak current plus the
fundamental peak current. The point to be made here, is the concern of saturation in
iron-core reactors can be eliminated by proper design of the reactor. In specifying Iron-
core reactors, the following points should be noted:
• The Iron-core reactor should be designed so that it will not saturate when the
harmonic flux and fundamental flux is totally additive (coincidence factor of 1.0).
• Saturation should be defined as the point in which there is a 10% loss of

inductance.
• The harmonic current spectrum should account for voltage regulation,

manufacturing tolerances in both the reactors and the capacitors, and
harmonic load growth.
If the above points are specified, saturation should not be of concern for Iron-core
reactors.
Harmonic Current Rating (RMS)
The harmonic current rating is the vector sum of the harmonic currents, and is a
concern in both Iron-core and Air-core reactors. The current rating determines the
winding conductor cross sectional area and should be specified when ordering the
reactor. The current should account for present and future harmonic load growth, plus
increased fundamental and harmonic currents due to voltage regulation and
manufacturing tolerances in the capacitors and the reactors. When specifying the
reactor, the current spectrum should be specified since higher order harmonics have
increased heating effects.
Space Requirements
Space requirements are usually a concern associated with Air core reactors due to the
stray magnetic field. These fields can be reduced by shielding, but shielding can add
cost to the bottom line. If shielding is necessary, it should be specified when ordering
the reactor since it can have an effect on the reactor inductance. The following
practices are usually followed when Air-core reactors are utilized:
• No metallic objects forming closed loops (re-bar, ground grid, ceiling joist, etc.)
shall be within one diameter of the reactor. Typically, this would create a 12 foot
x 12 foot area (assuming the reactors are stacked) with the reactor at the
center. If the reactors are not stacked, more floor area would be necessary.
• Aluminum and sectionalized gasketed steel enclosures can have clearances

down to 1/2 diameter between enclosure walls and the reactor.
• If re-bar directly below the reactor is of concern (or other metal forming loops),
pedestals may be used to raise the reactors away from the floor, ceiling or
ground. If the reactors cannot be raised due to height limitations, a 12 foot x 12
foot x 3/8" thick aluminum plate can be placed directly under the reactor for
shielding. The cost for such a plate would be on the order of $1100.
• If health effects are of concern, the reactor manufacture should be consulted to

determine the distance requirements to meet safe magnetic field levels. As a
general rule, the magnetic field 1/2 diameter from the reactor will be
approximately 30 Gauss. A thin wall enclosure will supply no shielding effect. To
get lower fields, more space can be provided, or a 3/8" Aluminum curtain
(shield) around the reactor could be used. If personnel can come in contact
with the aluminum curtain, a double wall enclosure may be required due to
excessive temperature of the Aluminum and the danger of burns.
Conclusion
Both Iron-core and Air-core reactors have benefits and disadvantages, but when
properly designed, specified and applied, their performance is equivalent.
Northeast Power Systems, Inc.
66 Carey Road
Queensbury, New York 12804
Phone: 518-792-4776
Fax: 518-792-5767
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.nepsi.com
Copyright © 1999 - 2012 Northeast Power Systems, Inc.

Iron Core Vs Air Core

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Iron Core Vs Air Core

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Iron Core Vs Air Core

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Iron-Core Versus Air-Core Harmonic Filter Reactors

Figure 1 - Typical iron-core and air-core reactor designs

Figure 2 - Typical Iron-Core and Air-Core Filter Designs

Stray Magnetic Fields

Table 1 - Comparison of Iron and Air Core Reactors

Table 1 – Comparison of Iron and Air Core Reactors

• Saturation should be defined as the point in which there is a 10% loss of

• The harmonic current spectrum should account for voltage regulation,

• Aluminum and sectionalized gasketed steel enclosures can have clearances

• If health effects are of concern, the reactor manufacture should be consulted to

Copyright © 1999 - 2012 Northeast Power Systems, Inc.

You might also like