Baumann 2020
Baumann 2020
Baumann 2020
Review
Continuous Flow Photochemistry for the Preparation
of Bioactive Molecules
Mara Di Filippo, Cormac Bracken and Marcus Baumann *
School of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Science Centre South, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland;
[email protected] (M.D.F.); [email protected] (C.B.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +353-01-617-2117
Abstract: The last decade has witnessed a remarkable development towards improved and new
photochemical transformations in response to greener and more sustainable chemical synthesis
needs. Additionally, the availability of modern continuous flow reactors has enabled widespread
applications in view of more streamlined and custom designed flow processes. In this focused review
article, we wish to evaluate the standing of the field of continuous flow photochemistry with a
specific emphasis on the generation of bioactive entities, including natural products, drugs and their
precursors. To this end we highlight key developments in this field that have contributed to the
progress achieved to date. Dedicated sections present the variety of suitable reactor designs and
set-ups available; a short discussion on the relevance of greener and more sustainable approaches;
and selected key applications in the area of bioactive structures. A final section outlines remaining
challenges and areas that will benefit from further developments in this fast-moving area. It is hoped
that this report provides a valuable update on this important field of synthetic chemistry which may
fuel developments in the future.
1. Introduction
The last decade has witnessed a much-welcomed renaissance and subsequent exploitation of
photochemical transformations within the chemistry community. This renewed interest in utilizing light
to bring about chemical reactions is largely fueled by a desire to realize more sustainable approaches
for target molecule synthesis, along with significant advances in the field of photoredox catalysis
where both transition metals and organic dyes have been exploited. The availability of suitable
light sources, ranging from light-emitting diodes (LED) to continuous fluorescent lamps (CFL) and
powerful UV lamps (e.g., medium-pressure mercury lamp), furthermore, has driven this development.
Consequently, a plethora of known and newly developed photoreactions has been reported in the
literature, rendering facile access to diverse chemical entities through selective transformations that
oftentimes offer orthogonal approaches to the synthetic chemist [1–6].
In addition, continuous flow technology [7–13] has had a major impact on popularizing
photochemical reactions, as it not only provides the tools to effectively perform photochemical
reactions, but moreover helps overcoming limitations that are inherent to photochemistry. As such, the
short path lengths provided by narrow, light-permeable tubing ensure that light can easily penetrate
the substrate solution, thereby mitigating limitations commonly arising from the Beer–Lambert law.
Furthermore, by placing the light source near the reactor coil or microchip of the flow set-up, very
efficient and uniform radiation of the substrate can be achieved. Oftentimes low-energy, tunable
light sources are favored in combination with suitable cooling mechanisms to effectively control
both temperature and energy input. Finally, continuous flow processing allows for simple reaction
scale-up of the resulting photoreaction without alteration of reaction parameters and the short residence
times within the photoreactor reduce the likelihood of decomposition of substrate or product due
to over-radiation.
As a consequence of the successful union of flow reactor technology with modern photochemical
applications, a growing body of literature has emerged, including topical reviews by leading experts
in the field [14–17]. As the field of continuous flow photosynthesis is moving forward at fast pace,
we wish to provide a focused review on its impact on generating bioactive molecules [18–20]. This
appears both timely and paramount, as the last ten years have provided the foundations to now apply
continuous photochemistry to the syntheses of various biologically active entities—drugs, natural
products and their precursors. In addition, we wished to evaluate whether there had been significant
uptake of this technology by chemists outside traditional academic laboratories and whether flow
photochemistry had advanced to be a viable option to generating bioactive molecules in industrial
settings. To accomplish this, we first review the design of various reactor types and outline innovative
aspects that aid in overcoming traditional bottlenecks. The second section investigates progress on
continuous photochemical approaches targeting greener and more sustainable synthesis means. That is
then followed by a dedicated section reviewing recent applications of photochemical transformations
to enable the formation of bioactive species, before an assessment of the feasibility of readily integrating
photochemical transformations into advanced multistep sequences in flow mode.
Figure 1. Images of a falling film reactor plate (reproduced with permission from [25]) and the Corning
G3 photoreactor [26].
Figure 2. Image of the nebulizer-based photo-reactor (reproduced with permission from [27]).
Related applications that also exploit thin films were recently reported by Poliakoff and George
who used a modified rotary evaporator set up (Figure 3). In this case substrate solutions are delivered
into the rotating flask via the side port of the set-up. LEDs or UV–Vis lamps effectively irradiate the
film generated rendering a system that can be run either continuously or semi-continuously based on
low budget components that are readily available in research laboratories [28].
Figure 3. Image of the photochemical reactor set up (reproduced with permission from [28]).
Raston and Stubbs recently reported on a vortex fluidic device that comprises a
temperature-controlled reactor zone into which the substrate solution can be delivered continuously
(Figure 4). The resulting thin film again provides a high surface-to-volume ratio, and thus enables
effective and uniform irradiation. This was effectively demonstrated for the generation of new C–C
bonds via photo-redox transformations [29].
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 4 of 13
Figure 4. Representations of the vortex fluidic device. (A) A schematic of the vortex fluidic device; (B)
A photograph of the vortex fluidic device; (reproduced with permission from [30]).
In order to enable large scale generation of desired photo-products, Booker-Milburn and co-workers
recently reported on a new photo-flow reactor known as Firefly (Figure 5). In this set-up, several
parallel tubes are interconnected and arranged around a powerful light source (e.g., 400 W Hg-lamp).
Equipped with an effective cooling mechanism, this reactor provides an internal volume of 120 mL
and can deliver multigram quantities of photo-adducts per minute, which can be scaled to kilogram
quantities per day [31].
Figure 5. Representations of the firefly photoreactor. (a) Diagram of reactor; (b) Firefly reactor in
operation; (reproduced with permission from [31]) .
In addition to the above photo-flow reactors that display innovative engineering to uniquely
resolve limitations known from batch applications, a variety of photochemical reactors exist that
are readily integrated with commercial flow modules. These are typically based on reactor coils
made of various fluorinated polymers that are combined with suitable light sources ranging from
LEDs to medium pressure Hg lamps. Examples of these systems include Vapourtec’s UV150 and
high-power LED reactor (e.g., [32–34]) system and Uniqsis’s PhotoSyn (e.g., [35,36]), as depicted in
Figure 6. Due to their modular nature, these systems are easy to use in everyday lab applications, and
can be complemented with broad-band filters or dedicated photo-spectrometers. The popularity and
effectiveness of these continuous flow photoreactors can be seen in many applications that have been
reported over the years.
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 5 of 13
Figure 6. Images of the Vapourtec high-power LED reactor and Uniqsis’s PhotoSyn reactor.
As can be seen from this compilation of continuous photo-reactors, numerous reactor types
have been developed, and their successful application to different types of chemical reactions
(i.e., cycloadditions, photooxygenations, etc.) demonstrates how limitations inherent to batch
photochemistry can be overcome by appropriately engineered devices. All these systems have
short pathlengths in common that result from thin films or small tubing diameters, and thus enable
the effective and uniform irradiation of molecules. In addition, continuous flow processing ensures
homogeneous irradiation profiles without over-irradiating substrates that might otherwise lead to
undesired side reactions and accompanying discoloration of reaction products.
works of Cannizzaro, Paterno and Ciamician); however, the heterogeneity of solar light (≈5% UV, ≈43%
visible, ≈52% IR), together with inconsistent photon flux (seasons, cloud coverage, day/night pattern
and geographical impact), make this approach challenging. In order to mitigate these challenges,
luminescent solar concentrators (LSC, Figure 7) can be used to down-convert solar radiation to
low-energy visible light that matches the absorption of specific photo-redox catalysts (e.g., methylene
blue) which would then enable a given transformation. In such set-ups most of the incoming solar light
is thus down-converted by fluorescent dyes embedded within the LSC, and transported within the
device to microchannels where it is absorbed by a specific photocatalyst that triggers a chemical reaction.
Although this technology is attractive, inevitable fluctuations in solar light input may require this
approach to be coupled with conventional light sources to achieve a consistent photochemical process.
Figure 7. Exploiting solar light for scaled luminescent solar concentrators (LSC) applications
(reproduced with permission from [48]).
Besides the availability and use of suitable and energy-efficient light sources, a further challenge
impacting the sustainability of photochemical reactions is the excessive use of solvents. An inherent
problem in photochemistry is the requirement for high dilutions to favor productive interactions
between photons and substrate (or catalyst) molecules. Therefore, most photochemical reactions are
run at or below concentrations of 20 mM, which in turn results in the generation of copious amounts of
solvent waste. It is therefore paramount to develop effective photochemical transformations based
on non-hazardous solvents such as water, alcohols, acetone and ethyl acetate. Additionally, future
continuous photoreactions should aim to incorporate solvent recycling systems whilst striving for
processes that are tolerant to higher effective concentrations. Recent progress in this area has already
highlighted the feasibility of performing multi-phasic photoreactions in slug-flow where suspensions
of substrate and/or photocatalyst can be processed through microchannels. Micro-mixing can be
achieved by Taylor flow in between immiscible phases (liquid/liquid, liquid/gas), which enhances the
performance of such systems ([49]).
Figure 8. Structures of complex bioactive molecules featuring flow photochemistry key steps.
Other examples include the photochemical preparation of the anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen
by a photo-Favorskii rearrangement, which highlights an attractive and atom-economical continuous
approach to this important target [57].
More recent examples describe routes towards various poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors
aided by an intramolecular photocyclization reaction [58], unnatural aza-rocaglates via an excited state
intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT)-mediated (3 + 2) photocycloaddition [59] or the preparation of
new derivatives of clausine A via an azide-mediated carbazole formation followed by an arylation
reaction [60] (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Structures of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and natural product analogues prepared
in flow.
Pyocyanin, a small naturally occurring virulence factor, was recently prepared in an effective and
scalable multi-step approach featuring a photochemical oxygenation reaction (Figure 10). This process
was, furthermore, coupled with immobilized reagents to facilitate the purification and isolation of the
target product [61].
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 8 of 13
Figure 10. Continuous photosynthesis of pyocyanin (reproduced with permission from [61]).
In addition to natural products and their analogs, several recent reports detail the use of
continuous photochemical methods for the generation of drug-like heterocyclic scaffolds that hold
interest in medicinal chemistry programs. 2,4-Methanopyrrolidines are an important heterocyclic
class of compounds that display higher hydrophilicity than regular pyrrolidines. Several applications
demonstrate that their continuous photochemical synthesis based on an intramolecular [2 + 2]
cycloaddition (Figure 11A) can be scaled to kilogram quantities in order to facilitate further
derivatization [31,62,63]. The synthesis of 3-hydroxyazetidines via a continuous Norrish–Young
photocyclization reaction (Figure 11B) represents a further demonstration of effectively creating
drug-like structures in a simple and atom-economical fashion, and a recent study reports on the
versatility of this transformation [64]. A final example outlines the combination of photochemical with
thermal processes in a reaction sequence rendering several isoindolin-1-one derivatives in a continuous
manner, in which a photobenzylation of substituted phthalimides features as key step [65] (Figure 11C).
Figure 11. Structures of drug-like heterocyclic entities prepared photochemically and their precursors.
(A) synthesis of 2,4-Methanopyrrolidines; (B) synthesis of 3-hydroxyazetidines; (C) photobenzylation
of substituted phthalimides.
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 9 of 13
In addition, many publications outline collaborative efforts between academics and their industry-based
colleagues, again highlighting the synergy of such joint projects. It can be anticipated that this
development will render further applications of continuous light-driven reactions, enabling the
synthesis of bioactive compounds, and as a consequence, will compensate for the relative scarcity of
drug-based applications at this point through innovative and powerful applications in both medicinal
chemistry settings and the scaled production of drugs.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, writing, editing and reviewing—M.D.F., C.B. and M.B. All authors
have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge support of our research in this area from the School of
Chemistry (PhD demonstratorships to M.D.F. and C.B.) and University College Dublin (SF1606 and SF1609) as
well as SSPC through PharM5.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Bach, T.; Hehn, J.P. Photochemical Reactions as Key Steps in Natural Product Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 1000–1045. [CrossRef]
2. Hoffmann, N. Photochemical Reactions as Key Steps in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1052–1103.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Kärkäs, M.D.; Porco, J.A., Jr.; Stephenson, C.R.J. Photochemical Approaches to Complex Chemotypes:
Applications in Natural Product Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9683–9747.
4. Ravelli, D.; Protti, S.; Fagnoni, M. Carbon-Carbon Bond Forming Reactions via Photogenerated Intermediates.
Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9850–9913. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Romero, N.A.; Nicewicz, D.A. Organic Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10075–10166. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
6. Skubi, K.L.; Blum, T.R.; Yoon, T.P. Dual Catalysis Strategies in Photochemical Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2016,
116, 10035–10074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Gutmann, B.; Cantillo, D.; Kappe, C.O. Continuous-Flow Technology—A Tool for the Safe Manufacturing of
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6688–6729. [CrossRef]
8. Movsisyan, M.; Delbeke, E.I.P.; Berton, J.K.E.T.; Battilocchio, C.; Ley, S.V.; Stevens, C.V. Taming hazardous
chemistry by continuous flow technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4892–4928. [CrossRef]
9. Baumann, M.; Baxendale, I.R. The synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) using continuous
flow chemistry. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 1194–1219. [CrossRef]
10. Britton, J.; Raston, C.L. Multi-step continuous-flow synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 1250–1271. [CrossRef]
11. Jensen, K.F. Flow chemistry—Microreaction technology comes of age. AIChE J. 2017, 63, 858–869. [CrossRef]
12. Fitzpatrick, D.E.; Ley, S.V. Engineering chemistry for the future of organic synthesis. Tetrahedron 2018, 74,
3087–3100. [CrossRef]
13. Baumann, M. Integrating continuous flow synthesis with in-line analysis and data generation. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2018, 16, 5946–5954. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Cambie, D.; Bottecchia, C.; Straathof, N.J.W.; Hessel, V.; Noël, T. Applications of Continuous-Flow
Photochemistry in Organic Synthesis, Material Science, and Water Treatment. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116,
10276–10341. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Sambiago, C.; Noël, T. Flow Photochemistry: Shine Some Light on Those Tubes! Trends Chem. 2019.
[CrossRef]
16. Knowles, J.P.; Elliott, L.D.; Booker-Milburn, K.I. Flow photochemistry: Old light through new windows.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 2025–2052. [CrossRef]
17. Elliott, L.D.; Knowles, J.P.; Koovits, P.J.; Maskil, K.G.; Ralph, M.J.; Lejeune, G.; Edwards, L.J.; Robinson, R.I.;
Clemens, I.R.; Cox, B.; et al. Batch versus Flow Photochemistry: A Revealing Comparison of Yield and
Productivity. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 15226–15232. [CrossRef]
18. Politano, F.; Oksdath-Mansilla, G. Light on the Horizon: Current Research and Future Perspectives in Flow
Photochemistry. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 1045–1062. [CrossRef]
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 11 of 13
19. Staveness, D.; Bosque, I.; Stephenson, C.R.J. Free Radical Chemistry Enabled by Visible Light-Induced
Electron Transfer. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 2295–2306. [CrossRef]
20. Bogdan, A.R.; Organ, M.G. Flow Chemistry as a Drug Discovery Tool: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective.
In Flow Chemistry for the Synthesis of Heterocycles; Sharma, U., Van der Eycken, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham,
Switzerland, 2018; p. 56.
21. Rehm, T.H. Reactor technology concepts for flow photochemistry. Chem. Photo. Chem. 2019. [CrossRef]
22. Shvydkiv, O.; Jähnisch, K.; Steinfeldt, N.; Yavorskyy, A.; Oelgemöller, M. Visible-light photooxygenation of
α-terpinene in a falling film microreactor. Catal. Today 2018, 308, 102–118. [CrossRef]
23. Elgue, S.; Aillet, T.; Loubiere, K.; Conté, A.; Dechy-Cabaret, O.; Prat, L.E.; Horn, C.R.; Lobet, O.; Vallon, S.
Flow photochemistry: A meso-scale reactor for industrial applications. Chimica. Oggi. 2015, 33, 58–62.
24. Emmanuel, N.; Mendoza, C.; Winter, M.; Horn, C.R.; Vizza, A.; Dreesen, L.; Heinrichs, B.; Monbaliu, J.-C.M.
Scalable Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methionine under Continuous-Flow Conditions. Org. Process Res. Dev.
2017, 21, 1435–1438. [CrossRef]
25. Al-Rawashdeh, M.; Hessel, V.; Löb, P.; Mevissen, K.; Schönfeld, F. Pseudo 3-D simulation of a falling film
microreactor based on realistic channel and film profiles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 5149–5159. [CrossRef]
26. CORNING. Available online: https://www.corning.com/emea/en/innovation/corning-emerging-innovations/
advanced-flow-reactors.html (accessed on 18 December 2019).
27. Ioannou, G.I.; Montagnon, T.; Kalaitzakis, D.; Pergantis, S.A.; Vassilikogiannakis, G. A Novel Nebulizer-Based
Continuous Flow Reactor: Introducing the Use of Pneumatically Generated Aerosols for Highly Productive
Photooxidations. ChemPhotoChem 2017, 1, 173–177. [CrossRef]
28. Clark, C.A.; Lee, D.S.; Pickering, S.J.; Poliakoff, M.; George, M.W. A Simple and Versatile Reactor for
Photochemistry. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 1792–1798. [CrossRef]
29. Gandy, M.N.; Raston, C.L.; Stubbs, K.A. Photoredox catalysis under shear using thin film vortex microfluidics.
Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11041–11044. [CrossRef]
30. Britton, J.; Stubbs, K.A.; Weiss, G.A.; Raston, C.L. Vortex fluidic chemical transformations. Chem. Eur. J. 2017,
23, 13270–13278. [CrossRef]
31. Elliott, L.D.; Berry, M.; Harji, B.; Klauber, D.; Leonard, J.; Booker-Milburn, K.I. A small-footprint, high-capacity
flow reactor for UV photochemical synthesis on the kilogram scale. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 1806–1811.
[CrossRef]
32. Chen, Y.; Cantillo, D.; Kappe, C.O. Visible Light-Promoted Beckmann Rearrangements: Separating Sequential
Photochemical and Thermal Phenomena in a Continuous Flow Reactor. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019,
2163–2171. [CrossRef]
33. Grainger, R.; Heightman, T.D.; Ley, S.V.; Lima, F.; Johnson, C.N. Enabling synthesis in fragment-based drug
discovery by reactivity mapping: Photoredox-mediated cross-dehydrogenative heteroarylation of cyclic
amines. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 2264–2271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Corcoran, E.B.; Levesque, F.; McMullen, J.P.; Naber, J.R. Studies Toward the Scaling of Gas-Liquid
Photocycloadditions. ChemPhotoChem 2018, 2, 931–937. [CrossRef]
35. Lima, F.; Grunenberg, L.; Rahman, H.B.A.; Labes, R.; Sedelmeier, J.; Ley, S.V. Organic photocatalysis for
the radical couplings of boronic acid derivatives in batch and flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 5606–5609.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Chen, Y.; May, O.; Blakemore, D.C.; Ley, S.V. A Photoredox Coupling Reaction of Benzylboronic Esters and
Carbonyl Compounds in Batch and Flow. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 6140–6144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Ley, S.V. On being green: Can flow chemistry help? Chem. Rec. 2012, 12, 378–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Dallinger, D.; Kappe, C.O. Why flow means green—Evaluating the merits of continuous processing in the
context of sustainability. Curr. Opin. Green Sust. Chem. 2017, 7, 6–12. [CrossRef]
39. Vaccaro, L.; Lanari, D.; Marrocchi, A.; Strappaveccia, G. Flow approaches towards sustainability. Green Chem.
2014, 16, 3680–3704. [CrossRef]
40. Lummis, J.A.M.; Morse, P.D.; Beingessner, R.L.; Jamison, T.F. Towards more efficient, greener syntheses
through flow chemistry. Chem. Rec. 2017, 7, 667–680. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Verschueren, R.H.; De Borggraeve, W.M. Electrochemistry and photoredox catalysis: A comparative
evaluation in organic synthesis. Molecules 2019, 24, 2122. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 12 of 13
42. Fukuyama, T.; Hino, Y.; Kamata, N.; Ryu, I. Quick execution of [2+2] type photochemical cycloaddition
reaction by continuous flow system using a glass-made microreactor. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1430–1431.
[CrossRef]
43. Cambie, D.; Noël, T. Solar Photochemistry in flow. Top. Curr. Chem. 2018, 376, 45. [CrossRef]
44. Cambie, D.; Dobbelaar, J.; Riente, P.; Vanderspikken, J.; Shen, C.; Seeberger, P.H.; Gilmore, K.; Debije, M.G.;
Noël, T. Energy-efficient solar photochemistry with luminescent solar concentrator based photomicroreactors.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14374–14378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Oelgemöller, M. Solar photochemical synthesis: From the beginnings of organic photochemistry to the solar
manufacturing of commodity chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9664–9682. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Roth, H.D. The beginnings of organic photochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1989, 28, 1193–1207. [CrossRef]
47. Roth, H.D. Twentieth century developments in photochemistry. Brief historical sketches. Pure Appl. Chem.
2001, 73, 395–403. [CrossRef]
48. Zhao, F.; Cambie, D.; Janse, J.; Wieland, E.W.; Kuijpers, K.P.L.; Hessel, V.; Debije, M.G.; Noël, T. Scale-up of a
luminescent solar concentrator-based photomicroreactor via numbering-up. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018,
6, 422–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Pieber, B.; Shalom, M.; Antonietti, M.; Seeberger, P.H.; Gilmore, K. Continuous heterogeneous photocatalysis
in serial micro-batch reactors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 9976–9979. [CrossRef]
50. Levesque, F.; Seeberger, P.H. Continuous-flow synthesis of the anti-malaria drug artemisinin. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1706–1709. [CrossRef]
51. Gilmore, K.; Kopetzki, D.; Lee, J.W.; Horvath, Z.; McQuade, D.T.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Seeberger, P.H.
Continuous synthesis of artemisinin-derived medicines. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12652–12655. [CrossRef]
52. Fuse, S.; Tanabe, N.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshida, H.; Doi, T.; Takahashi, T. Continuous-flow synthesis of vitamin D3 .
Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8722–8724. [CrossRef]
53. Fuse, S.; Mifune, Y.; Tanabe, N.; Takahashi, T. Continuous-flow synthesis of activated vitamin D3 and its
analogues. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 5205–5211. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Escriba-Gelonch, M.; Noël, T.; Hessel, V. Microflow high-p,T intensification of vitamin D3 synthesis using an
ultraviolet lamp. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 147–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Lainchbury, M.D.; Medley, M.I.; Taylor, P.M.; Hirst, P.; Dohle, W.; Booker-Milburn, K.I. A Protecting Group
Free Total Synthesis of (±)-Neostenine via the [5+2] Photocycloaddition of Maleimides. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
73, 6497–6505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Ralph, M.; Ng, S.; Booker-Milburn, K.I. Short flow-photochemistry enabled synthesis of the cytotoxic lactone
(+)-goniofufurone. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 968–971. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Baumann, M.; Baxendale, I.R. Continuous photochemistry: The flow synthesis of ibuprofen via a
photo-Favorskii rearrangement. React. Chem. Eng. 2016, 1, 147–150. [CrossRef]
58. Fang, Y.; Tranmer, G.K. Continuous flow photochemistry as an enabling synthetic technology: Synthesis
of substituted-6(5H)-phenanthridinones for use as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Med. Chem.
Commun. 2016, 7, 720–724. [CrossRef]
59. Wang, W.; Cencic, R.; Whitesell, L.; Pelletier, J.; Porco, J.A., Jr. Synthesis of aza-rocaglates via ESIPT-mediated
(3+2) photocycloaddition. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12006–12010. [CrossRef]
60. Parisien-Collette, S.; Collins, S.K. Exploiting photochemical processes in multi-step continuous flow:
Derivatization of the natural product Clausine, C. ChemPhotoChem 2018, 2, 855–859. [CrossRef]
61. Mortzfeld, F.B.; Pietruszka, J.; Baxendale, I.R. A simple and efficient flow preparation of pyocyanine a
virulence factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 5424–5433. [CrossRef]
62. Levterov, V.V.; Michurin, O.; Borysko, P.O.; Zozulya, S.; Sadkova, I.V.; Tolmachev, A.A.; Mykhailiuk, P.K.
Photochemical in-flow synthesis of 2,4-methanopyrrolidines: Pyrrolidine analogues with improved water
solubility and reduced lipophilicity. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 14350–14361. [CrossRef]
63. Elliott, L.D.; Booker-Milburn, K.I. Photochemically produced aminocyclobutanes as masked dienes in
thermal electrocyclic cascade reactions. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1463–1466. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Ruggeri, M.; Dombrowski, A.W.; Djuric, S.W.; Baxendale, I.R. Photochemical flow synthesis of
3-hydroxyazetidines. ChemPhotoChem 2019, 3, 1212–1218. [CrossRef]
65. Mumtaz, S.; Robertson, M.J.; Oelgemöller, M. Continuous flow photochemical and thermal multi-step
synthesis of bioactive 3-arylmethylene-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindolin-1-ones. Molecules 2019, 24, 4527. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Molecules 2020, 25, 356 13 of 13
66. Strauss, F.J.; Cantillo, D.; Guerra, J.; Kappe, C.O. A laboratory-scale continuous flow chlorine generator for
organic synthesis. React. Chem. Eng. 2016, 1, 472–476. [CrossRef]
67. Baker, J.R.; Gilbert, J.; Paula, S.; Zhu, X.; Sakoff, J.A.; McCluskey, A. Dichlorophenylacrylonitriles as
AhR ligands that display selective breast cancer cytotoxicity in vitro. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 1447–1458.
[CrossRef]
68. Rehm, T.H. Photochemical fluorination reactions—A promising research field for continuous flow synthesis.
Chem. Eng. Technol. 2016, 39, 66–80. [CrossRef]
69. Bume, D.D.; Harry, S.A.; Pitts, C.R.; Lectka, T. Sensitized aliphatic fluorination directed by terpenoidal
enones: A “visible light” approach. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 1565–1575. [CrossRef]
70. Barthelemy, A.-L.; Dagousset, G.; Magnier, E. Metal-free visible-light-mediated hydrotrifluoromethylation of
unactivated alkenes and alkynes in continuous flow. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019. [CrossRef]
71. Abdiaj, I.; Bottecchia, C.; Alcazar, J.; Noël, T. Visible-light-induced trifluoromethylation of highly
functionalized arenes and heteroarenes in continuous flow. Synthesis 2017, 49, 4978–4985.
72. Beatty, J.W.; Douglas, J.J.; Cole, K.P.; Stephenson, C.R.J. A scalable and operationally simple radical
trifluoromethylation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7919. [CrossRef]
73. Ushakov, D.B.; Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P.H. Consecutive oxygen-based oxidations convert amines to
a-cyanoepoxides. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12649–12651. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
74. Kouridaki, A.; Huvaere, K. Singlet oxygen oxidations in homogeneous continuous flow using a gas–liquid
membrane reactor. React. Chem. Eng. 2017, 2, 590–597. [CrossRef]
75. Radjagobalou, R.; Blanco, J.-F.; Dechy-Cabaret, O.; Oelgemöller, M.; Loubiere, K. Photooxygenation in an
advanced led-driven flow reactor module: Experimental investigations and modelling. Chem. Eng. Process
Process Intensif. 2018, 130, 214–228. [CrossRef]
76. Babra, J.S.; Russell, A.T.; Smith, C.D.; Zhang, Y. Combining C-H functionalisation and flow photochemical
heterocyclic metamorphosis (FP-HM) for the synthesis of benzo[1,3]oxazepines. Tetrahedron 2018, 74,
5351–5357. [CrossRef]
77. Cantillo, D.; Mateos, C.; Rincon, J.A.; de Frutos, O.; Kappe, C.O. Light-induced C-H arylation of (hetero)arenes
by in situ generated diazo anhydrides. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 12894–12898. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
78. Santoro, S.; Ferlin, F.; Ackermann, L.; Vaccaro, L. C–H functionalization reactions under flow conditions.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2767–2782. [CrossRef]
79. Lange, H.; Carter, C.F.; Hopkin, M.D.; Ley, S.V. A breakthrough method for the accurate addition of reagents
in multi-step segmented flow processing. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 765–769. [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).