ANPC vs. BIR
ANPC vs. BIR
ANPC vs. BIR
Facts: Respondent BIR issued RMC No. 35-2012, entitled "Clarifying the Taxability of
Clubs Organized and Operated Exclusively for Pleasure, Recreation, and Other Non-
Profit Purposes," which was addressed to all revenue officials, employees, and others
concerned for their guidance regarding the income tax and Valued Added Tax (VAT)
liability of the said recreational clubs.
As to the income tax, the BIR asserts that "[c]lubs which are organized and
operated exclusively for pleasure, recreation, and other non-profit purposes
are subject to income tax under the National Internal Revenue Code
[(NIRC)] of 1997. The BIR justified the said interpretation based on the
provision in the [ 1977 Tax Code] which granted income tax exemption to such
recreational clubs was omitted in the current list of tax exempt corporations under [the
1997 NIRC], as amended.
With respect to the VAT component, RMC No. 35-2012 provides that "the gross
receipts of recreational clubs including but not limited to membership fees,
assessment dues, rental income, and service fees are subject to VAT." As
basis, the BIR relied on Section 105, Chapter I, Title IV of the 1997 NIRC, which states
that even a nonstock, nonprofit private organization or government entity is liable to
pay VAT on the sale of goods or services.
The ANPC submitted a position paper to the BIR requesting "the non-application of RMC
[No.] 35-2012 for income tax and VAT liability on membership fees, association dues,
and fees of similar nature collected by [the] exclusive membership clubs from [their]
members which are used to defray the expenses of the said clubs." However, the BIR
did not act upon on the request of the ANPC.
Consequently, the ANPC filed a petition for declaratory relief before the RTC seeking to
declare RMC No. 35-2012 invalid, unjust, oppressive, confiscatory, and in violation of
the due process clause of the Constitution. The ANPC argued that in issuing RMC No.
35-2012, the BIR acted beyond its rule-making authority in interpreting that payments
of membership fees, assessment dues, and service fees are considered as income
subject to income tax, as well as a sale of service that is subject to VAT.
RTC found that given the apparent intent of Congress to subject recreational clubs to
taxes, the BIR, being the administrative agency concerned with the implementation of
the law, has the power to make such an interpretation through the issuance of RMC No.
35-2012. As an interpretative rule issued well within the powers of the BIR, the same
need not be published and neither is a hearing required for its validity.
Issue: whether or not the RTC erred in upholding in full the validity of RMC No. 35-2012
Ruling:
The Court declared as invalid the BIR's interpretation in RMC No. 35-2012 that
membership fees, assessment dues, and the like are part of "the gross receipts of
recreational clubs" that are "subject to VAT.
It is a basic principle that before a transaction is imposed VAT, sale, barter or exchange
of goods or properties, or sale of a service is required.
As ANPC aptly pointed out, membership fees, assessment dues, and the like are not
subject to VAT because in collecting such fees, the club is not selling its service to the
members. Conversely, the members are not buying services from the club when dues
are paid; hence, there is no economic or commercial activity to speak of as these dues
are devoted for the operations/maintenance of the facilities of the organization. As
such, there could be no "sale, barter or exchange of goods or properties, or sale of a
service" to speak of, which would then be subject to VAT under the 1997 NIRC.
Incometax-
In fine, for as long as these membership fees, assessment dues, and the like
are treated as collections by recreational clubs from their members as an
inherent consequence of their membership, and are, by nature, intended for
the maintenance, preservation, and upkeep of the clubs' general operations
and facilities, then these fees cannot be classified as "the income of
recreational clubs from whatever source" that are "subject to income
tax."54 Instead, they only form part of capital from which no income tax may
be collected or imposed.