21 Adisa
21 Adisa
21 Adisa
SUMMARY
The study aimed to establish the common reasons for non-adherence to drug
treatment among breast cancer patients at the Obafemi Awolowo University
Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria over a ten-year period (Jan 1993 -
Dec 2002). Patients’ adherence and reasons for non-adherence to chemotherapy
were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Two hundred and twenty-five breast
cancer patients including 199 females and 6 males with breast cancer were
recruited. 12(5.3%) patients had Stage I disease while 126 (56%) were in stage
IV. The non-adherence rate was 80.9% and 111(73%) of the non-adherent
patients were eventually not seen again. Of the one hundred and one patients
who gave reasons for non-adherence, 45% complained of financial difficulties;
18% thought they were well enough; 15% were fearful of subsequent operation
and 11% were unable to further bear the drug side effects. In conclusion, the
study demonstrated poor economic status of the patients as one of the major
reasons for non-adherence to cancer chemotherapy in Nigeria. Government
subsidy of breast cancer treatment, improved health education and advocacy
complemented by home visiting to encourage hospital attendance would be
required for better adherence to chemotherapy.
22 African Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 15, Number 1, January- March 2008
influence this among breast cancer patients in another eleven refused chemotherapy even
our environment. after adequate counselling. On the whole, 188
of the 225 patients had chemotherapy. Of
Materials and Methods these, 59 (31.4%) had neo-adjuvant
chemotherapy alone, 81 (43.1%) had adjuvant
A review of the clinical records of chemotherapy while 48 (25.5%) had both neo-
histologically proven cases of breast cancer adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. CMF
seen over a ten year period of January 1993 combination chemotherapy
through December 2002 at the Ife Hospital (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate and 5-
Unit of the Obafemi Awolowo University Fluorouracil) was used in 149 patients, while
Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAUTHC), Ile- CAF (Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-
Ife, South-West Nigeria was carried out. Fluorouracil) was used in combination for 21
Those whose hospital records were incomplete patients. CMF with Vincristine (CMFV) was
were excluded. Demographic and clinical used in 12 patients. 92 (48.9%) patients had
information including treatment records were Tamoxifen prescribed along with their
studied. Chemotherapeutic agents received, chemotherapy. (Table II)
the numbers of courses, patient’s adherence as The non-adherence rate was 80.9%
well as details of non-adherence were further (152 of 188) and a pattern of non-adherence
studied. was seen across all age groups, chemotherapy
A patient was considered to be non- combinations and disease stage. Forty (21.3%)
adherent if they did not present for two patients defaulted before the end of the first
consecutive doses of chemotherapy. Patients course while 95 (50.5%) patients defaulted
who had dose reduction and/ or omission due within the first three courses of chemotherapy.
to inadequate haematological profile or poor Also, we found that at one year after
clinical condition were not included as defaulting, 111(73%) of these patients had not
defaulters. The patients who missed their returned for further treatment and many were
medications due to no fault of theirs either subsequently lost to follow up. Only 7 patients
because of unplanned public holidays or other came back to continue treatment within a
reasons beyond their control were excluded month of defaulting.
from the study. The data were subjected to The reasons for non-adherence were
descriptive analyses. available in only 101 cases. Of these, 45
(45%) were noted to have defaulted due to
financial constraints, 18 (18%) patients
Results because they felt well; 15 (15%) because of
fear of subsequent operation; 11 (11%) did so
There were 225 cases of breast cancer seen because of unbearable drug side effects, while
during the study period. Majority (97.3%) 19(19%) patients defaulted for various other
were females and 6 were males. The ages reasons.
ranged from 26 to 86 years with a mean of 48 The group of patients (N= 18) who
(SD: 12.3) years. More than one quarter of the were non-adherent because they felt well were
patients were under 40years of age, with aged between 30-45years and 16 of them had
69(30.6%) being 40-49years old, and stage I and II diseases. Nine had neo-adjuvant
13(5.8%) 70years and above. There were more chemotherapy with very good response and
lesions on the right (47.1%) than the left indeed 5 out of them had a dramatic response
(44.1%). Twenty patients (8.9%) had bilateral with non-palpable tumours after the first
breast involvement at presentation. Using the course of chemotherapy. The remaining 9 had
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) mastectomy but defaulted before, during or
staging system, 12 (5.3%) patients presented after the first course of adjuvant
in Stage I, 28 (12.4%) in stage II, 59 (26.2%) chemotherapy. Twelve patients of this group
in stage III and 126 (56%) in stage IV (Table were lost to follow up while 6 re-presented
I). Presentation at advanced stage was again with stage IV disease.
recorded for all age groups. In the final analysis, 51patients
Twenty-six patients who presented in (22.6%) died during the course of treatment,
very poor clinical condition died before 22 (9.8%) patients were referred for
chemotherapy could be instituted while radiotherapy, 15 (6.7%) re-presented with
African Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 15, Number 1, January- March 2008 23
recurrence after initial treatment, 5 (2.3%) 5years without any recurrence), while 132
were adjudged to be cured of the disease (58.7%) patients were lost to follow-up.
(having attended follow-up clinic for over
Table 1: Age and Stage at Presentation of Women with Breast Cancer in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Age Stage at Presentation
(Yr) N StageI StageII StageIII StageIV
<30 6 2 - 1 3
30-39 50 1 6 14 29
40-49 69 4 11 14 40
50-59 49 4 7 15 23
60-69 38 1 3 8 26
70-79 11 - 1 6 4
≥80 2 - - 1 1
Reason No Percentage
Financial Difficulty 45 45%
Feels Well 18 18%
Fear of Operation 15 15%
Drug Side Effects 11 11%
Others 19 19%
(No reasons were given for non-adherence in 51 patients)
24 African Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 15, Number 1, January- March 2008
the tumour preparatory for surgery while 130 recurrent nausea and vomiting that
patients had adjuvant chemotherapy. This is necessitated admission for rehydration and
largely due to the fact that a large number of they subsequently defaulted.
the patients presented late thus precluding It is of interest that 15 patients
initial surgery. Combination chemotherapy defaulted after counselling for mastectomy. In
was used in all the patients. The combination Africa, many women find it difficult to accept
of Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate and 5- the option of mastectomy [27]. A study in
Fluorouracil (CMF) was used in most of the Egypt observed that most of the women were
patients in this study. Anthracycline-based primarily concerned with keeping their breasts
combinations, which are common in regardless of the disease stage [28]. It is
developed countries, were used in only 11% of possible that the relatively young age of many
the patients in this study largely due to its high of the women in this study, lack of
cost. Similarly patients were not placed on understanding by their spouses, the general
newer chemotherapeutic agents such as the fear of surgery and anaesthesia as well as the
Taxanes as they were largely unavailable and relatively low rate of breast reconstruction
unaffordable to most of our patients. surgeries were responsible for not readily
Since there is no health welfare consenting to mastectomy. Furthermore
scheme in place in Nigeria during the period because most of the patients present with
of the study, the burden of procuring advanced disease, the option of breast
expensive chemotherapeutic agents was borne conserving surgeries is not usually available
by the patients and their relations. Significant for them.
proportion of the patients being agrarian and It is also worthy of note that the group
generally poor, could not afford the estimated of 18 patients that defaulted for reason of
average cost of US$100 for procuring a course being better were young adults with operable
of CMF chemotherapy. This probably affected disease stages. One half of them were on neo-
patients’ adherence to the chemotherapy adjuvant chemotherapy with significant effects
schedule in most instances. Indeed 45% of including complete regression in five patients.
patients who gave reasons for non-adherence The paradox of wellness and non-adherence is
to chemotherapy cited financial constraint as a difficult problem, as these patients would
the problem. In the experience of the authors, probably have benefited more from
many of the patients in the environment are chemotherapy use. It is possible that religious
unable to procure more than the first course of belief in faith healing that is common in the
chemotherapy and are usually not able to environment and the initial tumour
continue with the schedule. Perhaps if cancer disappearance led to default based on bad
treatment were to be subsidized again by the advice.
government (as was the case in the early 1980s The clinic attendance by the patients
in our part of the country) perhaps there would was also a problem. More than one-half (132,
be significant improvement in the rate of non- representing 58.7%) of the patients were lost
adherence. to follow-up at different points in the course of
In a study of patients adherence to their treatment. This observation is similar to
chemotherapy for breast cancer carried out at findings in many studies from developing
Sussex, United Kingdom, 55% of patients countries [29-30]. Problems confronting the
receiving chemotherapy were noted not to patients ranging from financial difficulties to
have adhered to medications either the prolonged denial of the illness as well as
unintentionally (due largely to forgetfulness) the strong superstitious belief in the use of
or intentionally (due to drug side effects and traditional and or spiritual healing approaches
difficulty swallowing tablets) [24]. Drug side may contribute to this. The poor follow-up
effects have also been given as reason for non- made it difficult to assess the efficacy of
adherence among women taking Tamoxifen chemotherapy as well as the final outcome in
[25,26]. In the current series, 11 patients many of the patients. Health education and
(5.8%) reported intentional non-adherence advocacy as well as home visiting and tracing
because of drug side effects. Some of these of breast cancer patients may reduce this
were young women who had severe alopecia problem.
and skin hyperpigmentation which were
cosmetically unacceptable. Two of them had
African Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 15, Number 1, January- March 2008 25
Conclusion Geographical Medicine. 1984;
36:249-253.
This study has, in highlighting the severe 9. Ihekwaba FN. The management of
burden of breast cancer in Nigeria male breast cancer in Nigerians.
demonstrated poor economic status of the Postgraduate Medical Journal. 1993;
patients as one of the major reasons for non- 69:562-565.
adherence to cancer chemotherapy. One way 10. Eifel P, Axelson JA, Costa J, Crowley
perhaps of encouraging patients to present and J, Curran WJ Jr., Deshler A, Fulton S,
adhere to chemotherapy treatment is to Hendricks CB, Kemeny M, Komblith
introduce highly subsidized breast cancer AB, Louis TA, Markman M, Mayer R
treatment in government hospitals. Health and Roter D. National institute of
education and advocacy complemented by Health Consensus Development
home visiting to encourage hospital attendance Conference Statement: adjuvant
may be required to improve the rate of therapy for breast cancer, Nov 1-3,
adherence to chemotherapy. 2000. Journal of the National Cancer
Institute. 2001.93:979-989
11. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women
References with node-negative breast cancer. The
Steering Committee on Clinical
1. Anim JT. Breast cancer in sub- Practice Guidelines for the Care and
Saharan African women. African Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian
Journal of Medicine and Medical Medical Association Journal. 1998;
Sciences. 1993; 22:5-10. 158: S43-S51
2. Wabinga HR, Parkin DM, Wabwire- 12. Polychemotherapy for early breast
Mangen F, Nambooze S: Trends in cancer: an overview of the randomised
cancer incidence in Kyadondo County, trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’
Uganda, 1960–1997.British Journal of Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1998;
Cancer. 2000; 82:1585-1592. 352:930-942.
3. Adebamowo CA and Ajayi OO. 13. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women
Breast Cancer in Nigeria. West with node-positive breast cancer. The
African Journal of Medicine. 2000; Steering Committee on Clinical
19:179-191. Practice Guidelines for the Care and
4. Gukas ID, Jennings BA, Mandong Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian
BM, Igun GO, Girling AC, Manasseh Medical Association Journal.1998;
AN, Ugwu BT and Leinster SJ. 158: S52-S64
Clinicopathological features and 14. Othieno-Abinya NA, Nyabola LO,
molecular markers of breast cancer in Abwao HO and Ndege P. Postsurgical
Jos, Nigeria. West African Journal of management of patients with breast
Medicine. 2005; 24:209-213. cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital.
5. Ikpatt OF, Ndoma-Egba R and Collan East African Medical Journal. 2002;
Y. Influence of age and prognosis of 79:156-162.
breast cancer in Nigeria. East African 15. Taylor SE, Lichtman RR and Wood
Medical Journal. 2002; 79:651-657 JV. Compliance with chemotherapy
6. Adesunkanmi AR, Lawal OO, among breast cancer patients. Health
Adelusola KA and Durosimi MA. The Psychology. 1984; 3:553-562.
severity, outcome and challenges of 16. De Maio E, Gravina A, Pacilio C,
breast cancer in Nigeria. Breast. 2006; Amabile G, Labonia V, Landi G,
15:399-409. nuzzo F, Rossi E, D’Aluto G, Capasso
7. Anyanwu SN. Survival following I, Rinaldo M, Morrica B, Elmo M, Di
treatment of primary breast cancer in Maio M, Perrone F and de Matteis A.
eastern Nigeria. East African Medical Compliance and toxicity of adjuvant
Journal. 2000; 77:539-543. CMF in elderly breast cancer patients:
8. Chiedozi LC. Breast carcinoma in a single-center experience. BMC
young Nigerian women. Tropical Cancer. 2005; 5:30
26 African Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 15, Number 1, January- March 2008
17. Olivotto A, Coldman AJ, Hislop TG, (Royal College of Radiologists). 1991;
Trevisan CH, Kula J, Goel V and 3:78-80.
Sawka C. Compliance with practice 28. Nour A. Breast-conserving therapy in
guidelines for node-negative breast low-literacy patients in a developing
cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. country. Breast Journal. 2003; 9:71-
1997; 15:216-222. 73
18. Steiner JF and Earnest MA. The 29. Nyirenda M, Sinfield R, Haves S,
language of medication-taking. Annals Molyneux EM and Graham SM. Poor
of Internal Medicine. 2000; 132:926- attendance at a child TB contact clinic
930. in Malawi. The International Journal
19. Osterberg L and Blaschke T. of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.
Adherence to Medication. New 2006; 10:585-587
England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 30. Yeats JR. Attendance compliance for
353:487-497 short-course tuberculosis
20. Okobia MN, Bunker CH, Okonofua chemotherapy at clinics in Estcourt
FE and Osime U. Knowledge, attitude and surroundings. South African
and practice of Nigerian women Medical Journal. 1986; 70:265-266.
towards breast cancer: A cross-
sectional study. World Journal of
Surgical Oncology. 2006; 4: 11.
21. Kidmas AT, Ugwu BT, Manasseh
AN, Iya D and Opaluwa AS. Male
breast malignancy in Jos University
Teaching Hospital. West African
Journal of Medicine. 2005; 24:36-40.
22. Ikpatt OF, Kuopio T, Ndoma-Egba R
and Collan Y. Breast cancer in Nigeria
and Finland: epidemiological, clinical
and histological comparison.
Anticancer Research. 2002; 22:3005-
3012.
23. Vorobiof DA, Sitas F and Vorobiof G.
Breast Cancer Incidence in South
Africa. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
2001; 19:125S-127S
24. Atkins L and Fallowfield L.
Intentional and non-intentional non-
adherence to medication amongst
breast cancer patients. European
Journal of Cancer. 2006; 42:2271-
2276
25. Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS, Sikka P and
Mittal S. Adherence beliefs among
breast cancer patients taking
tamoxifen. Patient Educational and
Counselling. 2005; 59:97–102.
26. Lash TL, Fox MP, Westrup JL, Fink
AK and Silliman RA. Adherence to
tamoxifen over the five-year course.
Breast Cancer Research and
Treatment. 2006; 99:215-220.
27. Ajekigbe AT. Fear of Mastectomy: the
most common factor responsible for
late presentation of carcinoma of the
breast in Nigeria. Clinical Oncology
African Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 15, Number 1, January- March 2008 27