4 - 610 - ms16 - Sander - 0

MOTOR SUMMIT 2016
Zurich, Switzerland
Efficient Motor Policy for Europe

View from CEMEP
Jürgen Sander, CEMEP President

O c t o b e 1 2 th 2 0 1 6
CEMEP Members Across the
European Member States
Country Association
Belgium Agoria
Denmark Dansk Industri
The Federation of Finnish Technology
Finland
Industries
France GIMELEC
Germany ZVEI
Italy ANIE
Netherland FEDA
Poland PIGE
Portugal ANIMEE
Spain AFBEL
UK GAMBICA
UK BEAMA
• CEMEP is the European Committee of Manufacturers of Electrical Machines and Power
Electronics.
• CEMEP is representing an industry with a market value of 6.3 Bln € and 130.000 employees
• About 30 companies are involved with their experts in the activities of CEMEP
• The members of CEMEP are the National Associations that representing important industries
Markets of CEMEP Products
Uninterruptible power 1,2 Bln € Low voltage motors

supplies
CEMEP
2,0 Bln € CEMEP
share 50% share 70%
2,3 Bln € 0,8 Bln €
Variable speed drive systems High voltage motors
CEMEP CEMEP
share 80% share 90%
Social Responsibility of the CEMEP
Manufacturing Industries
 Unemployment rate in Europe shall be as low as possible. Small and

Medium sized Enterprises, representing more than 70% of the production
 Competitiveness of European industries should be benchmark
 Economic earnings from sold motors and drive systems shall be

competitive for the European industry
 Value added from European manufacturing shall be a brand, understood

as a quality promise
General Principles
 We have to face a global evolution in all areas and our industrial sector in Europe is ready to
compete but also to pay the necessary attention to social responsibility aspects
 We have to evaluate the existing “technical” shifts on social, economic, technical and political
as well as ethical levels. All these processes are sustained by and for people
 To enable this virtuous process we need, as Industry, a new level of quality
 This means that we need a new framework but also considering the competence and
intelligence of the individuals.
 This new approach exists today in the concept of Better Regulation and Circular
Economy
 We as CEMEP are taking part of this innovative process and we need to be involved more and
more. We need Europe
Main Tasks and Activities
 We are working to strengthen Cemep organization to become more representative
 We strongly want to support proactively the qualitative changes in Regulation and

Legislation in Europe in the near future. Cemep is implementing a new Task Force on
Circular Economy with the aim to create common positions of our sector to support the
development of the concept of circular economy at EU level.
 In our Industrial Groups we are discussing about the future requirements in different
fields, for example:
 Ecodesign Lot 30 Motors and Drives
 Digitization (ICT)
 WEEE 2 (Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment )
 REACH (phthalic anhydrides …) (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and
Restriction of Chemicals)
 Standardization aspects (tolerances for motors, new Mandates …)
…
The principle of a better regulation
 CEMEP supports the approach that a European regulation in conjunction with a European standard
lays down the requirements for eco-friendly design of motors
 EU’s product policy should pursue the “better regulation” agenda always! There are however several
contradictory situations
 For example while the Circular Economy Package places a greater emphasis on the availability of
spare parts, the Ecodesign requirements for motors forbid to use spare parts and make it difficult to
repair these products
 Another example is related to the additional Mandate M 543 of the European Commission that already
requests standardization for increasing the raw material efficiency but adversely affects the
component efficiency (Mandates M/470 and M/476) which requires more raw materials
 We are not interested in consuming more material but we strongly want to be more innovative and to
put more intelligence in or products and systems thanks to the competences in our companies
 CEMEP therefore calls the European policy makers for a careful application of the “better
regulation” principle with a coordinated and homogeneous approach. Otherwise the result is
to confuse the market and hinder the Industry
Battle of Materials
A surprising view on
the giant consumption
of material in the field
of „high efficiency
competition“
Photo: wikipedia
Position
Energy savings with line-fed asynchronous motors, even of an IE4 class are poor compared
with the potential (200 TWh) of variable-speed driven equipment, when it benefits from adapting
the speed (e.g. pumps, compressors, fans etc.)
At 11 kW, comparison with a line-fed IE1 motor shows:

IE1 IE4
Energy Savings 0% 5,7%
Material 60 kg 100 kg
At 11 kW, energy savings with variable-speed (PDS) of IES1 class against the IE1 motor
IE1 PDS (IES1)
Energy savings 0% >55%
Material 60 kg 60 kg + 10 kg = 70 kg
Increasing of line-fed IE classes leads to a giant depletion of material (environmental resources)

with low CO2 savings benefit.
This is an unsocial evolution for the upcoming generations. For line-fed use IE3 shall remain as
the economic and ecologic optimum
Ecodesign Process STANDSTILL
Circular
Economy
Refugees
BREXIT
June 2016 - still waiting for reply and

New legislation
2014 Sept results from the impact assessment
March 2018 ??
29th.
Design Products
 Electric Motors or Variable Speed Drives are complex products to design
 The balance between technical, economic and environmental feasibility is addressed in the
product design, with the ultimate aim of producing a functional and safe product
 To design products that are complex as well as sustainable requires scope for innovation
 For example for all considerations regarding potential expansion of Ecodesign requirements,
CEMEP calls for consistent attention of the relevance and avoidance of double regulation.
Components like a motor or a VSD are in fact used in many other products
 CEMEP therefore calls the European policy makers to apply the product policies
paying attention without causing restrictions for this trend to innovation
Market surveillance in Europe
 Market Surveillance is one of the key points for the right implementation of all the measures
that touches the competitivity of an industrial sector
 For Cemep sectors market surveillance is mainly related to the Ecodesign Lot 30 Regulation
 Market surveillance is the responsibility of the EU Member States
 At present, market surveillance performs very few checks for cost reasons
 The member states shall designate the authorities responsible for market surveillance and
specify the necessary tasks, powers and organizational arrangements. The market
surveillance itself checks the identification and mandatory information on the product: the
Declaration of Conformity and technical documents and device characteristics (random
samples), particularly the efficiency that is measured in a certified laboratory.
 CEMEP asks the EU and the Member States to fulfill their duty and take care of a fair
competition in Europe. There is no need for further regulation, product database or
additional labels. First, we have to follow the existing system that the authorities are
responsible for market surveillance
European demand for the CEMEP motor market
European market demand of LV Motors
in the range of the Efficiency Classes
IE2 - IE4
Comments:
• The basis are about 3.0 million motors sold p.a. in Europe - many of them are embedded in
machinery, which may be exported outside of Europe.
• The motor manufactures in CEMEP have already invested in new and challenging
technologies. However, the European market demand seems to be ok for IE3 but low for IE4.
• Developing the industrial market acceptance needs a longer process (~ 2 to 3 years) than
just short regulative timing slots (2011, 2015, 2017). The economic situation of the machine
builders as well as the commitment for system improvement are decisive for the evolvement
of the shares of IE2, IE3 and IE4 motors
Conclusion:
• The efficiency of applied motors which are not in the scope of the Ecodesign regulation no
640/200, should be as high as appropriate. Therefore, deeper understanding about
applicative life cycle costs and system efficiency is necessary.
• Persuasive actions are desired in order to support an increasing understanding of the market
mechanism, which may result in an appropriate understanding for the right efficiency classes
on the European market.
Summary and Future Expectations
CEMEP to protect the European social responsibility for 130.000 employees in the motors and
drives manufacturing industries !
CEMEP to strengthen the national market surveillance but balanced to protecting the industrial
expertise and economics !
CEMEP to stop the “battle of materials” and to showing “eco-design” alternatives (e.g.
Extended Product Approach), for improving industrial efficiency !
CEMEP to go through “better regulation” principle with a coordinated and homogeneous

approach. Otherwise the result is to confuse the market and hinder the Industry
CEMEP to defend the industrial trend for innovation avoiding European policies potential cause
of restrictions on the freedom of the designers
CEMEP to collaborate with non-European associations but rejecting new global labelling
programs !
Thank you!
Jürgen Sander
President
European Committee
of Manufacturers of Electrical
Machines and Power Electronics
(CEMEP )

4 - 610 - ms16 - Sander - 0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4 - 610 - ms16 - Sander - 0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

4 - 610 - ms16 - Sander - 0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MOTOR SUMMIT 2016

Efficient Motor Policy for Europe

Jürgen Sander, CEMEP President

Uninterruptible power 1,2 Bln € Low voltage motors

2,3 Bln € 0,8 Bln €

Variable speed drive systems High voltage motors

 Unemployment rate in Europe shall be as low as possible. Small and

 Competitiveness of European industries should be benchmark

 Economic earnings from sold motors and drive systems shall be

 Value added from European manufacturing shall be a brand, understood

 To enable this virtuous process we need, as Industry, a new level of quality

 We are working to strengthen Cemep organization to become more representative

 We strongly want to support proactively the qualitative changes in Regulation and

At 11 kW, comparison with a line-fed IE1 motor shows:

Increasing of line-fed IE classes leads to a giant depletion of material (environmental resources)

June 2016 - still waiting for reply and

 Electric Motors or Variable Speed Drives are complex products to design

 Market surveillance is the responsibility of the EU Member States

CEMEP to go through “better regulation” principle with a coordinated and homogeneous

You might also like