Team: Loco - Optimitism: Topic: Waste Energy Recovery From Locomotive Engine

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Team: Loco_optimitism 

Topic: Waste energy recovery from Locomotive engine 


 

ABSTRACT 
Working Principle of the proposed idea: 
The idea is to implement the Organic Rankine Cycle(ORC) for recovering the waste heat energy 
between the engine and the radiator. ORC systems use an organic fluid with a high molecular 
mass and a low vaporization point, e.g. silicone oil. These working fluids allow very efficient 
exploitation of low-temperature heat sources, e.g. engine coolant, to produce electricity. Unlike 
the water-steam-cycle, the heat in the coolant can be harnessed for both preheating and 
evaporating the working fluid. 
 
1. Thermal heat rejection 65%, that is 2-2.8 MW of heat rejection for 4500 HP to 6000 HP 
2. 20 to 30 % of heat generated from the power stroke in combustion in the engine is 
wasted and warms the part in contact with the combustion chamber, so the cooling 
system is basically designed to carry away this particular amount of heat from the 
system so that the engine works in the optimal conditions 
3. And around 30-40% of heat gets rejected from the engine exhaust (​Temperature around 
400-800​0​C​) which gets further transmitted to the turbocharger to compress the air used 
for combustion and then released to the atmosphere through the chimney. 
4. In the cooling system in locomotive, where water cooling system is installed, water is 
used to cool the engine blocks, oil, and the components of the turbocharger. 
5. The heated water coming from the engine block comes to the bubble collector where the 
steam and the water gets separated and the steam gets transported to the Extension 
tank and also the heated water that comes from the turbocharger gets transported to 
the steam collector where again the steam gets transported to the Extension tank, in two 
of these cases the water when separated with the steam gets transmitted to the radiator 
where is gets further cooled. 
6. Hereby we are proposing two approaches for implementation of the idea: 

a. First approach: Assuming that if the bubble collector is removed and the heat 
exchanger is being fitted between the radiator and the heated water coming directly 
from the engine blocks, the steam coming from the steam collector is enough to 
regulate the pressure in the whole cooling system since the performance of the 
cooling system greatly depend upon the total pressure in the system. The motive 
here is to recover the maximum amount of heat from the steam and liquid mixture of 
water rather than separating the steam from the mixture and this would not add up 
to any significant changes in the design 

b. Second approach: If removing the bubble collector is having a significant effect in 
the total pressure of the cooling system and its becomes difficult to regulate the total 
pressure in the cooling system then the idea is to fit a heat exchanger between the 
bubble collector and the radiator that will basically collect the heat from heated 
water being transmitted from the bubble collector to the radiator 

7. Along with the above two methods one heat exchanger can be installed to extract the 
heat from the exhaust released from the turbocharger. Since the exhaust temperature 
from the turbocharger is high enough we can use normal Rankine cycle here  

 
 
PROS 
1. Minimum infrastructure change: Implementing this cycle would just require the addition of a 
heat exchanger or removal of the bubble collector. So this makes upgrading of the already 
existing locomotive engine design quite easy.  
2. High cycle efficiency: In theory ORC has a high cycle efficiency of 17%-20%. So even if we 
manage to get an efficiency of 10% we could recover energy in the kW scale considering energy 
loss is in MW scale. 
3. Low operating temperature: Since our coolant temperature will not exceed 120​o​C , using a 
normal Rankine cycle is not feasible for the heat exchangers between the engine radiator 
4. Extensive support: ORC is a well-researched topic and we have optimized the setup for a 
variety of conditions. Thus we can focus the majority of our attention on implementing the 
cycle, rather than doing research on optimizing the cycle as per our needs. 
 
PLAN OF ACTION 
Our main task will be to design a heat exchanger that can extract energy from the system 
connecting the engine to the radiator, and from the exhaust gases released from the 
turbocharger. The energy extracted will be used to bring the working fluid of the respective 
Rankine Cycle to the required input conditions of the turbine. This implies that we must fix a 
turbine that will be used in the cycles(else we won’t know the input conditions of turbine).The 
selection of turbine will involve databasing available turbine for their input conditions, then we 
will look into the feasibility of achieving those conditions from the waste heat that we have and 
from this we can decide an optimal turbine for the cycle. The turbine will be connected to a 
generator that will produce electricity which can be stored or used as per our needs. 
The plan is to simulate the design of the heat exchanger on Ansys to verify our numerical 
estimations. We have planned to run simulations using Ansys or any other suitable software to 
verify our design of the heat exchanger. The plan is to perform the simulation in order to verify 
whether our design is able to achieve the required input conditions of the turbine and optimise 
the design of heat exchanger. Usually, the input conditions of the turbine are superheat, 
pressure, mass flow rate, etc.Two different types of heat exchangers will be designed as one will 
be used to extract heat from exhaust gas and the other will extract heat from the cooling 
system. Along with design optimization economic feasibility will also be a point of focus. 

You might also like