NGS GrafoilEngineeringDesignManual
NGS GrafoilEngineeringDesignManual
NGS GrafoilEngineeringDesignManual
FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE
®
Table of Contents
A BRIEF HISTORY OF NEOGRAF......................................................................... 6
PREFACE.......................................................................................................... 7
2
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
3
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
List of Figures
FIGURE 1 Crystal Structure of Graphite.......................................................................................................................................... 8
FIGURE 2 Manufacturing Process for Flexible Graphite Sheet Products ..................................................................................... 9
FIGURE 3 Manufacturing Processes for GRAFOIL Sheet and Laminates.................................................................................... 10
FIGURE 4 Stress vs. Strain of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite............................................................................................................ 15
FIGURE 5 R
elative Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite
(Thermal Conductivity Through the Thickness).......................................................................................................... 17
FIGURE 6 Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite
(Thermal Conductivity along Length and Width)........................................................................................................ 17
FIGURE 7 Specific Heat of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite ................................................................................................................ 18
FIGURE 8 Total Emissivity vs. Temperature of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite................................................................................ 18
FIGURE 9 GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Electrical Resistivity Through Thickness........................................................................ 19
FIGURE 10 Oxidation in Air of Various Grades of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite............................................................................. 21
FIGURE 11 Surface Area for Various Densities of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite............................................................................ 23
FIGURE 12 Photograph Showing How Inhibited GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Grade GT™J Reduces Pitting Corrosion........... 26
FIGURE 13 Representation of Compressibility and Recovery Measurement ............................................................................ 30
FIGURE 14 Variation of Compressibility and Recovery with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Density ............................................ 30
FIGURE 15 S
pringback Resilience of 85 lb/ft3 Density GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite......................................................................... 31
FIGURE 16 Compressive Stress Versus Strain of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (All Grades Except Grades GH™E and GH™O) .... 31
FIGURE 17 Compressive Stress Versus Strain for GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Grades GHE and GHO.......................................... 31
FIGURE 18 Gasket Load Bearing Ability: Compressive Stress versus Temperature...............................................................................32
FIGURE 19 Thermal Conductivities............................................................................................................................................... 57
FIGURE 20 U-Heat Transfer............................................................................................................................................................ 58
FIGURE 21 Variation of Heat Transmission with Load................................................................................................................. 58
FIGURE 22 Gasket Deflection......................................................................................................................................................... 71
FIGURE 23 Actual Stress vs. Tightness Parameter....................................................................................................................... 73
4
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
List of Tables
TABLE I Essential Characteristics of Graphite ............................................................................................................................... 8
TABLE II The Effect on Other Properties of Increasing GRAFOIL Sheet Density......................................................................... 13
TABLE III Typical Room Temperature Properties of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Sheets........................................................... 14
TABLE IV Coefficient of Friction of GRAFOIL Laminate on Stainless Steel.................................................................................. 16
TABLE V Heat Transfer Through GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Joints ........................................................................................... 17
TABLE VI Oxide Impurities in GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite............................................................................................................ 19
TABLE VII Typical Quantitative Analysis of Grades GT™A and GT™B ......................................................................................... 20
TABLE VIII Wetting Angle of Molten Metals................................................................................................................................... 22
TABLE IX Shore Durometer Hardness for GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite ........................................................................................ 23
TABLE X Mechanical Properties of Radiated GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite................................................................................... 24
TABLE XI Galvanic Series................................................................................................................................................................ 26
TABLE XII Typical Functional Test Results for GRAFOIL Sheets and Laminates......................................................................... 28
TABLE XIII Creep Relaxation for 1/16" (1.6 mm) Thick GRAFOIL Laminates............................................................................... 29
TABLE XIV “m” & “Y” Values for GRAFOIL Products...................................................................................................................... 32
TABLE XV PVRC Gasket Constants for GRAFOIL Products........................................................................................................... 33
TABLE XVI Strong Oxidizers (Not recommended with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite) .................................................................. 41
TABLE XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite......................................................................... 42
TABLE XVIII Typical Contact Resistance of Graphite.................................................................................................................... 59
TABLE XIX Thermal Conductivity Conversion Factors................................................................................................................. 59
TABLE XX Temperature Limits of Polymers.................................................................................................................................. 61
TABLE XXI Joint Performance Factors.......................................................................................................................................... 62
TABLE XXII Nonmetallic GRAFOIL Laminates............................................................................................................................... 63
TABLE XXIII Semimetallic GRAFOIL Laminates ........................................................................................................................... 63
TABLE XXIV Spiral Wound and Double Jacketed GRAFOIL Gaskets............................................................................................ 63
TABLE XXV Minimum Gasket Width............................................................................................................................................... 66
TABLE XXVI “m” & “Y” Factors for Various Gasket Materials....................................................................................................... 67
TABLE XXVII Bolt Length Comparison.......................................................................................................................................... 68
TABLE XXVIII Notation Symbols and Definitions......................................................................................................................... 70
TABLE XXIX Volumetric Equivalents for 1mg/sec ........................................................................................................................ 72
TABLE XXX Bolt Torque Requirements for GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite GH™R and GHE.......................................................74-75
TABLE XXXI Torque Values to Obtain 50,000 PSI Tensile Stress for Various Size Bolts..............................................................78
TABLE XXXII Common Gasket Factors for PVRC Design Calculations ........................................................................................78
TABLE XXXIII Bolt Torque Required to Produce Bolt Stress........................................................................................................79
TABLE XXXIV Various Metallic Gasket Materials Information .....................................................................................................80
TABLE XXXV Pressure-Temperature Ratings of Flanges .............................................................................................................81
5
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Flexible graphite’s flexibility, resilience, and conformability enables NeoGraf to commercially manufacture a variety of
materials and products, providing its customers with individually designed products and solutions for diverse applications
in a wide range of industries. NeoGraf’s rich history of innovation, technical expertise, and a dedication to quality and
customer service will serve its customers well into the 21st century.
As a global supplier, NeoGraf’s success hinges on its reputation for quality... quality in its products and services, its
people, and its relationships with customers, vendors and suppliers. Beginning in the early 1980’s, NeoGraf embarked
on an ambitious program of continuous quality improvement in every facet of its operations. It was among the first in its
industry to adopt Statistical Process Control (SPC) manufacturing methods. NeoGraf employs the latest (SPC) methods to
reduce product variation. At every stage of its manufacturing process -from raw materials to final finishing - rigid programs
and procedures produce the highest quality flexible graphite products in the world. NeoGraf was also among the first to
embrace a philosophy of Total Quality that extends throughout its organization, achieving ISO-9002 certification in 1996
and QS-9000 in 2000. NeoGraf’s philosophy of Total Quality permeates the total organization from its stringent product
and process standards to its innovative management methods and training programs. It is this constant quest for Total
Quality, to meet the needs of its customers, that assures NeoGraf’s continuing success as a world leader in its industry.
NeoGraf has a proud heritage of more than a century of industry leadership and product innovation. Today, no other
company in the world is better positioned to serve the needs of the growing global marketplace for high quality natural
graphite-based products and solutions. With this knowledge and technology base, NeoGraf will continue to identify new
growth opportunities.
6
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Preface
In 1965 NeoGraf (formerly Union Carbide Corp/UCAR Carbon/GrafTech International) introduced GRAFOIL flexible
graphite. It was the first fluid sealing product made exclusively from pure, natural graphite. GRAFOIL flexible graphite
was created by a unique NeoGraf process. GRAFOIL flexible graphite was invented in the United States and the patents
on GRAFOIL products are held by NeoGraf LLC.
This special material exhibits outstanding fluid sealing characteristics that continue to solve the most challenging
gasketing and packing problems in industry. Like its forerunner, pyrolytic graphite, GRAFOIL flexible graphite is resistant
to heat, has no water of crystallization, is naturally lubricious, is chemically inert, and is an excellent conductor of heat
and electricity.
Unlike manufactured pyrolytic graphite, GRAFOIL material is flexible, compactible, conformable and resilient. GRAFOIL
flexible graphite can be made into an infinite variety of shapes to fit virtually any fluid sealing application.
The intent of this engineering design manual is to assist the engineer in using GRAFOIL flexible graphite by providing
technical data regarding GRAFOIL sheet and gasketing materials. For specific guidelines on gasket requirements and
design, the reader is encouraged to follow the recommendations put forth by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Some of these recommendations are included in Appendix 5. In addition, the pamphlet.Optimum Gasketing with GRAFOIL
Flexible Graphite. by Henry S. Raub, is available on request from NeoGraf LLC.
Since pioneering the development of GRAFOIL flexible graphite, NeoGraf has been committed to finding new ways to
make this unique product work for fluid processing industries. As time and technology create new problems, NeoGraf
will continue to provide users of GRAFOIL flexible graphite with the ultimate design control in fluid sealing products.
NeoGraf LLC makes no warranty, expressed or implied, concerning the information or statements set forth in this manual and
expressly disclaims any liability for incidental and consequential damages arising out of damage to equipment, injury to
persons or products, or any other harmful consequences resulting from the use of the information or reliance on any statement
set forth in this manual.
7
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
GRAFOIL flexible graphite is a distinctive material with the essential characteristics of graphite plus some unique properties
which make it a valuable material for packings and gaskets. Standard properties of manufactured graphite include thermal
stability, thermal conductivity, natural lubricity and chemical resistance to fluids. GRAFOIL flexible graphite combines these
properties with the added characteristics of flexibility, compactibility, con-formability and resilience. These characteristics
differentiate GRAFOIL flexible graphite from other forms of graphite, making it a superior, high-performance sealing material.
The essential characteristics of graphite and GRAFOIL flexible graphite are described in Table I.
Thermally Stable X X
Thermally Conductive X X
Naturally Lubricious X X
Flexible X
Compactible X
Conformable X
Resilient X
8
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The calendering involves only mechanical interlocking of Rolled Sheet Flat Sheet
the expanded flakes, and no added binders are required.
The resulting sheet product is essentially pure graphite: at
least 98% elemental carbon by weight, and having a highly
aligned structure. All of the chemicals added to the flake to Rolls of GRAFOIL flexible graphite are available in sheet
promote expansion are removed during the high temperature thicknesses of 0.003" to 0.065" (0.08 to 1.65 mm) and widths
expansion process. Only naturally occurring minerals (from of 24", 39.4" or 60" (61, 100, 152.4 cm). The standard roll
the raw materials) remain as part of the product in the form length is 100" (30.48 m), although other lengths up to 4000
of oxides of metals, typically referred to as ash. Premium (1200 m) are available upon request.
sheet products (such as those required for nuclear service)
are specially processed with extremely low levels of
potential impurities (typically 99.9% carbon). Added
corrosion and oxidation resistance can be introduced as
an integral part of the sheet material.
GRAFOIL sheet can also be laminated with metallic and nonmetallic materials to improve its handling, blowout resistance
and mechanical strength. The use of these laminating materials may alter the physical, thermal, chemical and electrical
properties of the laminate. Even though the inherent sealing ability of GRAFOIL flexible graphite can be reduced when the
non-graphite laminating materials are on the external surfaces of the gasket, such GRAFOIL laminates have some important
gasketing applications.
The manufacturing processes for producing GRAFOIL laminates are shown in Figure 3. Specific composites can be tailored
to meet many difficult sealing requirements.
9
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The different grades of GRAFOIL sheet and GRAFOIL laminate products are shown in Appendix 1.
10
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The ASTM Standard F-104 “Standard Classification System for Nonmetallic Gasket Materials” classifies flexible graphite
as a Type 5 nonmetallic gasket material. The type is further divided into Class 1 for homogeneous sheet and Class 2 for
laminated sheet.
GRAFOIL flexible graphite is an ideal replacement for asbestos-based gaskets. GRAFOIL flexible graphite can also be used in
high-temperature applications where asbestos is not suitable. The common asbestos fiber, chrysotile, begins to decompose
at 900°F (480°C), and organic elastomeric binders in typical gasket materials begin to decompose at even lower temperatures.
GRAFOIL products can be used at temperatures as high as 5400°F (3000°C) in reducing environments. Oxidation of graphite
occurs above 850°F (455°C) in the presence of oxygen or air. However, the temperature and rate of oxidation and consequent
useful life is a complex phenomenon depending on many variables, such as extent of exposure to temperature, gas velocity,
and oxygen concentration. GRAFOIL gasketing products are seldom exposed in bulk form. The .thin edge. exposure of
GRAFOIL packing and gasketing has successfully withstood extended periods of exposure to air at process fluid temperatures
up to 1500°F (815°C). GRAFOIL material is available in special grades with oxidation inhibitors which significantly reduce bulk
graphite oxidation rates at temperatures up to 1560°F (850°C). The chemical resistance and thermal stability of GRAFOIL
flexible graphite makes it an effective sealing material where fire-safe sealants are required.
GRAFOIL flexible graphite is compatible with most organic and inorganic chemicals that are non-oxidizing. Flexible
graphite should not be used in highly oxidizing chemicals such as mixtures of sulfuric acid and nitric acid or in very strong
mineral acids. In each application, the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) of the chemical should be reviewed. If there are
compatibility questions, contact NeoGraf Solutions.
The gasketing performance of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is superior to conventional elastomeric bonded gasketing. GRAFOIL
flexible graphite is more thermally stable and chemically inert with considerably less creep relaxation than elastomeric bonded
gasketing materials. GRAFOIL flexible graphite gaskets are also superior to other nonasbestos type sheet gaskets. When
nonasbestos fillers such as aramids, fiberglass, and mica have been used to replace asbestos, the elastomeric component
of the gasket has been increased to maintain saturation and bonding. The elastomer typically reduces gasket thermal
stability and increases creep, often resulting in poor performance under load.
A growing number of research papers show that GRAFOIL flexible graphite not only provides better sealing performance in
those applications where asbestos has traditionally been used, but that it offers excellent sealing capability over a wider
range of chemical and temperature conditions. As in all gasket applications, however, the equipment and flange design
must be adequate in order to achieve a seal. GRAFOIL flexible graphite is not a “cure all” gasket material, and should not be
depended on to compensate for poorly designed or poorly maintained sealing systems.
11
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Grade GTA is a high-purity grade (minimum 99.5% graphite) containing less than 50 ppm leachable chlorides, and less than
630 ppm total sulfur.
Grade GTJ is a high-purity grade based on Grade GTA. This grade contains phosphorous oxides as an inorganic, nonmetal-
lic, passivating corrosion inhibitor that also increases resistance to oxidation by about 125°F (70°C). Grade GTJ has a
minimum 99% graphite content. Grade GTJ is recommended for nuclear and other special applications where corrosion of
stainless steel components is of critical concern. Both grades GTA and GTJ meet the General Electric Non Metallic Nuclear
Materials Specification D50YP12 Revision 2. The passivating inhibitor in Grade GTJ is uniformly distributed throughout the
product during its manufacture and significantly reduces possible galvanic corrosion of stainless steel surfaces. This
process eliminates localized .hot spots. of corrosion which can occur with impregnated or coated passivating and
sacrificial inhibitors. Corrosion protection of stainless steel components such as valve stems, pump shafts, and flanges is
comparable with that of the sacrificial metal inhibitors, such as zinc and aluminum.
Grade GTB is the standard industrial grade with oxidation/corrosion inhibitors (minimum 98% graphite) containing less
than 50 ppm leachable chlorides and less than 1000 ppm total sulfur content. Note that Grade GTB has a leachable chloride
level well below most conventional asbestos based gaskets. Grade GTB meets the material requirements of the Naval Sea
Systems (NAVSEA) specification MIL-P-24503.
Grade GTK has the same purity level as Grade GTB and the improved resistance to oxidation and/or corrosion similar to
Grade GTJ.
12
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Bulk Density
The density of a GRAFOIL sheet is obtained from the physical measurements of length, width, thickness, and weight. The
standard density is 70 lbs/ft 3 (1.12 g/cc), although densities from 45 lbs/ft 3 (0.72 g/cc) through 85 lbs/ft 3 (1.36 g/cc) are also
available. Density is controlled in the manufacturing process by the degree of compaction during the calendering
operation. The theoretical density of graphite is 140 lbs/ft 3 (2.26 g/cc). Therefore, the standard GRAFOIL sheet at 70 lbs/ft 3
(1.12 g/cc) density is only one-half the theoretical density. This allows the sheet the compressibility required to produce
an effective seal in gasket applications.
The density of the GRAFOIL sheet also affects other properties. Increasing the density will affect the trend of other
properties as shown in Table II.
RECOVERY Increase
SEALABILITY Increase
FLEXIBILITY Decrease
HARDNESS Increase
As a comprehensive load is applied, the percent strain of the homogeneous sheet is increased. This relationship is
logarithmic, as shown in Figure 4.
13
14
Table III Typical Room Temperature Properties of GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite Sheets
UNITS GRAFOIL SHEET GRADES
PROPERTY ENGLISH ASTM METRIC METHOD GTA GTB GTJ GTK
Bulk Density of GRAFOIL Sheet lbs/ft 3 g/cc F-1315 70/1.12 70/1.12 70/1.12 70/1.12
2
Tensile Strength along Length and Width (1) lbs/in MPa F-152 750/5.2 650/4.5 750/5.2 650/4.5
3 2
Young’s Compress. Modulus Through Thickness 10 lbs/in GPa — 27/0.19 27/0.19 27/0.19 27/0.19
Compression Strength Maximum Usable Unconfined lbs/in2 MPa C-695 24,000/165 24,000/165 24,000/165 24,000/165
Gas Permeability Through Thickness Darcy’s X 10 -6 Darcy’s X 10 -6 C-577 <10/<10 <10/<10 <10/<10 <10/<10
Friction Static Coefficient Coefficient — All from 0.05 to 0.20
Minimum Working Temperature °F °C -400/-240 -400/-240 -400/-240 -400/-240
Maximum Working Temp. (2) °F °C 5400/3000 5400/3000 5400/3000 5400/3000
Thermal Conductivity BTU•in/ hr•ft2• °F W/m•K Fitch Method
Along Length and Width Along Length and Width All at 70°F(21°C) = 960/140
Through Thickness Through Thickness All at 70°F(21°C) = 36/5
Coef. of Ther. Exp. (Linear) 10 -6 10 -6m/m•°C —
Along Length and Width in/in•°F All at 70 to 2000°F (21°C to 1094°C) = -0.2/-0.4
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Leachable Chlorides (Maximum) ppm ppm F-1277 50/50 50/50 50/50 50/50
Notes:
(1) Tensile strength measured with cross-head rate of 0.5 in/min.
(2) Nonoxidizing — In an oxidizing atmosphere, 850°F (445 °C) is the maximum for Grade GTA and 975°F (525°C) is the maximum for Grades GTB, GTJ and GTK.
(3) Specific Heat from UCAR Carbon & Graphite Handbook.
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Tensile Strength
FIGURE 4 STRESS VS. STRAIN OF GRAFOIL SHEET
Generally, Grades GTA and GTJ have typical tensile strengths
AT DIFFERENT INITIAL DENSITIES
of 700 to 1000 psi (4,800 to 6,900 kPa) along the length and
MPa psi X 1000
width when measured on 1" by 4" (2.54 cm by 10.16 cm) 1.4 (90) 1.12 (70) 0.8 (50) Density
69100
10 g/cc (lb/ft3)
samples at a cross-head rate of 0.5 inches per minute (12.7 5
62 9
mm per minute). Grades GTB and GTK have typical tensile 55 80
8 2
strengths of 550 to 750 psi (3,800 to 5,170 kPa). 48 7
41 60
6
1
GRAFOIL laminate grade GHP can be used for high volume,
Stress
35 5 9
OEM applications, and where a certain degree of toughness 28 40
4
is required for handling, and in applications where stainless 21 3
steel is not recommended. This grade contains a 0.0015" 14 20
2
15
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
In a neutral, reducing, or vacuum environment, GRAFOIL flexible graphite stiffens slightly between the temperatures of 2000°F
(1095°C) and 3600°F (1980°C), but remains very usable. At 4980°F (2750°C), the vapor pressure is about 5 x 10-2 mm of Hg; at
5430°F (3000°C), the vapor pressure is approximately 0.4mm of Hg, as the flexible graphite begins to sublimate.
The useful temperature of reinforced laminates is influenced by the adhesives and inserted materials. For example, AISI 316
stainless steel limits the use temperature of Grades GHE and GHR to 1600°F (870°C), even in reducing or neutral atmospheres,
because of the characteristic limitation of the stainless steel inserts.
Friction Coefficient
The friction coefficient of homogeneous GRAFOIL flexible graphite was measured during a shear test. On a metal surface
with a 63 RMS or smoother finish, and a pre-load of 5000 psi (34.5 MPa) for 30 minutes, the friction coefficient was 0.2.
This test was performed two additional times, using the same test fixtures with residual graphite embedded in the surface
from the previous testing. In these two tests, the pre-load of 5000 psi (34.5 MPa) was held for five days. The friction coefficient
was reduced to 0.09. In an unrelated test with GRAFOIL sheet against stainless steel with an 8 psi (55 kPa) load, the friction
coefficient was measured at 0.05. Since the friction coefficient is a surface effect, the same values would apply to all
GRAFOIL laminates where the surfaces are the base grades of GRAFOIL sheet. Table IV shows the friction coefficient
of laminates made from GRAFOIL flexible graphite on stainless steel at various loads.
4 28 0.002 0.06
8 55 0.05 0.06
12 83 0.16 0.20
Impact Resistance
Impact resistance cannot be satisfactorily measured on standard GRAFOIL sheet. It is a ceramic material composed of
graphite crystals physically bonded together by a relatively low strength mechanical bond. This compressible structure
does not readily lend itself to standard impact tests designed to measure the impact resistance of brittle materials.
16
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Heat Transfer
The thermal conductivity of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is very directional or “anisotropic.” Along its length and width
(Figure 5) heat transfer may range from that of molybdenum to silver. Through its thickness, (Figure 6) GRAFOIL flexible
graphite will transfer heat in a manner that varies based on gasket density, flange finish, temperature, and clamping load
of the system. At very low density and load, the foil will conduct at a rate similar to stainless steel. At the load and density
obtained during its use in flange gaskets, heat transfer approaches that of aluminum (See Table V). This unique property
allows GRAFOIL flexible graphite to rapidly dissipate heat along the plane of the gasket and away from the surface of the
flange. At the same time, GRAFOIL flexible graphite can be used as a radiative heat barrier in high-temperature furnaces
(see the section on emissivity).
4.4 2000
30 1095 300 44 20 3
127um
60
40 90 um
2.9 20 20
The thermal conductivity when measured through the0thickness (Figure 6) decreases as temperature increases to 1500°F
(815°C), then remains relatively unchanged as the temperature is increased to 3500°F(1925°C). See Appendix 4, Thermal
and Electrical Conductivity, for additional in depth information.
0 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 ̊ F
-18 280 538 818 1084 1372 1850 1928 2208 2484 ̊ C
-18 280 538 818 1084 1372 1850 1928 2208 2484 ̊ C -18 280 538 818 1084 1372 1850 1928 2208 2484 ̊ C
Temperature Temperature
This value of linear thermal expansion through the thickness of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is similar to metals. Therefore,
in gasket applications, the sealing ability is little changed by temperature. The linear thermal expansion coefficients of
GRAFOIL laminates containing metallic interlayers will be influenced by the metal in the length and width dimension to
the extent that the metal will control the expansion. In the thickness dimension of the laminate, the thermal expansion
will be directly proportional to the thickness of the metal and its coefficient and to the thickness of GRAFOIL flexible
graphite and its coefficient.
Specific Heat
The specific heat of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is dependent on temperature. The specific heat from ambient to 3000°F
(1650°C) is shown in Figure 7. At ambient temperature, the specific heat of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is 0.17 BTU/lb•°F
(711 J/kg•°C), approximately that of steel.
J/kg ̊ C BTU/ lb • ̊ F
2000 0.5
1254 0.3
(815°C and 2480°C) is shown in Figure 8. The average emissivity over this temperature range is 0.5. This indicates that the
surface of GRAFOIL flexible graphite in this temperature range radiates half as much thermal energy as a perfect black
838 0.2
body. For this reason, GRAFOIL flexible graphite is an excellent reflector of thermal radiation. Therefore, GRAFOIL flexible
graphite is an excellent insulator when radiation is the principal mode
418 of
0.1heat transfer, i.e., above 1500°F (815°C). In
addition, the surface of GRAFOIL flexible graphite does not change with time in contrast to metals (such as molybdenum)
0 0.0
that are also used to reflect thermal radiation. The emissivity and radiative 0 reflectivity
400 800 of GRAFOIL
1200 flexible
1800 2000 2400 graphite
2800 3000 ̊ F
remain stable over long service periods. -18 205 427 649 872 1094 1317 1539 1850 ̊ C
Temperature
0.52
Emissivity
1254 0.3
0.50
838 0.2
0.48
18
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Electrical Resistivity
FIGURE 9 GRAFOIL FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE ELECTRICAL
The electrical properties of GRAFOIL flexible graphite are
RESISTIVITY THROUGH THICKNESS, LOAD AND
very directional and the resistivity along the length and
DENSITY VS RESISTIVITY
width is much less than that through the sheet. GRAFOIL
Load psi Load induced density, g/cc
flexible graphite is anisotropic and has higher electrical 1,000
resistance through the thickness of the sheet than in the psi micro-ohm-meter density, g/cc
100 14900 1.18
plane of the sheet, normally about 500 times higher. 800 300 6700 1.25
1.5
500 4600 1.33
Our lab did significant work to measure the resistance of 600
700 3700 1.43
1.4
900 3200 1.53
70 lbs/ft 3 (1.12 g/cc) GRAFOIL sheet in both the plane of the
sheet and through its thickness, 6.8 micro-ohm-meters 400 1.3
and from 15,000 to 3,200 micro-ohm-meters respectively.
The wide range of through thickness electrical resistivity 200 1.2
(15,000 to 3,200 micro-ohm-meters) of GRAFOIL flexible
graphite is dependent on the amount of clamping load 0
2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
applied to the sheet and the resulting density of the sheet
as a result of being compressed. As the density increases, Resistivity, micro-ohm-meters
GRAFOIL flexible graphite laminates containing polyester interlayers would have approximately the same electrical resistivity as
the homogeneous sheet in the length and width dimensions. However, in the thickness dimension, the electrical resistivity will
be controlled primarily by the plastic interlayer and is very high. The electrical resistivity of GRAFOIL laminates with metal
interlayers is reduced in all directions, but the amount of this reduction is influenced by the adhesive layer of the laminate.
19
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The constituents typically represent less than 2% of the weight, or less than 1% of the volume of grades GTB and GTK.
This small amount of ash will not create leak paths in a seal or gasket. Grades GTA and GTJ typically contain only 0.1% ash
in a similar oxide ratio.
The ash content of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is determined by completely oxidizing a sample of the material as instructed in the
ASTM Method C-561. Since the ash in the GRAFOIL sheet is mostly in stable oxides, it has little effect on the properties and end
use. However some of the trace element impurities in flexible graphite can behave as oxidation and corrosion catalysts. We
carefully control our raw material sources and processing to minimize these harmful elements. GRAFOIL flexible graphite
contains fewer of these harmful elements than most other brands of flexible graphite produced world wide.
Table VII shows the typical elemental analysis results for grades GTA and GTB obtained using inductively coupled plasma atomic
emission spectroscopy.
Table VII Typical Quantitative Analysis of Grades GTA and GTB Obtained by Inductively Coupled
Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
Na 15 142
Mg 78 1301
Al 68 962
Si 379 3972
K 32 356
Ca 93 1229
Ti 5.8 43
V 2.5 2.2
Cr 2.4 1.7
Mn 5.4 11
Fe 53 1336
Ni 1.2 2.0
Cu 1.5 2.3
Zn 18 2.4
Sr 1.2 3.9
Zr 11 10
Mo 1.7 11
Ba 1.9 3.4
Sulfur Content
The sulfur content of flexible graphite is influenced by the source and composition of the raw material and subsequent
processing steps. Thus there are small amounts of sulfur containing compounds in the ash component of all flexible
graphite. Sulfur can increase the corrosion rate of metals. The oxidation state (or valence state) of the sulfur compound
also reportedly influences the extent of corrosion. A valence value of +6 is considered particularly aggressive (see General
Electric Nuclear Specification D50YP12 Revision 2). While all GRAFOIL flexible graphite has a relatively low total sulfur content,
the levels in premium grades GTA and GTJ are especially low. Grades GTA and GTJ have maximum sulfur levels of 630 ppm
and typical levels of around 400 ppm. These levels will meet the most critical specifications within the nuclear power
generation industry. Standard industrial grades GTB and GTK have maximum sulfur levels of 1000 ppm and a typical level
of 500-700 ppm.
20
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Oxidation Rate
FIGURE 10 OXIDATION IN AIR OF VARIOUS GRADES
GRAFOIL flexible graphite has a carbon content which is
OF GRAFOIL FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE
typically 97-99.8%. The remainder is composed mainly of
inorganic oxides with very small amounts of other elements, 103
such as sulfur. The carbon begins to oxidize at temperatures GTA
GTK/GTB
over 450°F (230°C), in the presence of oxidizing gases, such 10
The degree of oxidation and subsequent useful life of GRAFOIL flexible graphite is a complex phenomenon depending on
many variables. For example, the extent of exposure to the atmosphere must be considered. In a gasketing application
between flanges of a pipe that is carrying an oxidizing atmosphere (or is exposed to air) the contact area of the atmo-
sphere with the gasket is very small. Also, the high thermal conductivity of the GRAFOIL flexible graphite can reduce the
temperature of the gasket in this application and, therefore, reduce the oxidation rate. The velocity of the oxidizing
atmosphere across the GRAFOIL flexible graphite is also important. High fluid or gaseous velocities break up the oxide
boundary layer and increase the oxidation rate.
The rate of oxidation is also related to the concentration, type, and amount of mineral impurities in the graphite. Some
elements, such as sodium and manganese, can act as oxidation catalysts. Therefore, the 850°F (455°C) temperature
should not be considered a maximum upper limit use temperature in air. This temperature could be higher or lower
depending on the application. The edge-plain of GRAFOIL gaskets has successfully withstood extended exposure to air at
process fluid temperatures up to 1500°F (815°C). Grades GTJ, GTB and GTK contain oxidation inhibitors which significantly
reduce graphite oxidation rates. The threshold temperature for these grades is about 975°F (525°C). These grades should
be considered where oxidation could pose a problem.
The weight loss of GRAFOIL flexible graphite when oxidized in flowing air at elevated temperatures is shown in Figure 10. The
graph shows the weight loss per unit area per hour over the temperature range of 840°F to 1380°F (450°C to 750°C) for the
standard GRAFOIL Grades GTA, GTJ, GTB, and GTK. These curves show, for instance, that at 600°C the weight loss per unit area
per hour of Grade GTA is 14 times that of Grade GTJ. The density of the GRAFOIL flexible graphite (between 50 and 90 lbs/ft3 (0.8
and 1.44 g/cc) has little effect on the weight loss per unit area caused by oxidation. But it must be remembered that at the lower
densities there is less material to oxidize and the effect on the performance will be more dramatic. The thickness of the GRAFOIL
sheet also has an effect on the weight loss per unit area; with the weight loss decreasing with increased thickness.
21
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
C + H2O = CO + H2
Therefore care must be taken when GRAFOIL flexible graphite is used in steam above this temperature.
Silver 136
Indium 141
Gallium 137-141
Germanium 139
Tin 149-153
Lead 138
Antimony 140
Bismuth 136
* From “Calculations of Interfacial Energy of Some Liquid Metals in Contact with Diamond or Graphite” by M.P. Doahov, Russian Journal of Physical
Chemistry, Vol. 55, pp. 623-1248, 1981.
22
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Durometer Hardness
The Shore Durometer Hardness A-2 for GRAFOIL flexible graphite is shown in Table IX:
10 30-35
30 80-85
50 85-90
70 90-95
90 95-98
Poisson’s Ratio
GRAFOIL flexible graphite does not have a Poisson's ratio. Under compression, it first compacts without sideways motion. As
the force becomes very high, there is sideways motion, but this essentially does not recover when the force is reduced.
107500 22
Surface Area, m 2/ g
23
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Leachable and Total Chlorides and Fluorides The typical total halide content of Grades GTA and GTJ is 70
ppm, with the typical total fluoride content less than the
GRAFOIL flexible graphite contains very small amounts of
detectable limit of 10 ppm. These grades are certified to
halides, i.e., chlorides and fluorides. Chlorides and fluorides
have a combined maximum of 50 ppm leachable chlorides
catalyze corrosion, and in critical applications, such as
and fluorides, with the typical value of each below the
nuclear power plants, the level must be kept very low.
detectable limit of 10 ppm. The leachable halogen content
Soluble or leachable halides are of greatest concern from is less than the total, since only a portion of the halides is
a corrosion standpoint. Leachable halides in aqueous removed by the leaching procedure. Both grades meet the
solutions accelerate pitting corrosion by permeating stainless General Electric Nuclear specification D50YP12 Revision 2.
steel’s chromium oxide film, greatly increasing electrical
Standard Industrial Grades GTB and GTK typically also
conductivity of the film at its weakest points and eventually
contain less than the detectable limits of 10 ppm leachable
causing its complete physical breakdown. The chloride ions
chlorides and fluorides, significantly lower than that of
act as a catalysts since they speed the reaction without
asbestos based sealing material.
actually entering into it. During the corrosion reaction of
stainless steel, no chlorides are formed, only iron oxides Test method ASTM F-1277 was developed by NeoGraf
and hydroxides. Solutions to determine leachable chlorides by an ion
selective electrode technique.
Table X Mechanical Properties of Radiated* GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite After 170 mega Rads Exposure
24
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
In chemical analysis for polynuclear aromatics (PNA), samples of GRAFOIL sheet were refluxed with benzene. No PNAs
were detected by sensitive gas chromatographic analysis. Other samples were extracted with chloroform and methanol
in sequence for infrared analysis. Again, no polynuclear aromatic compounds were detected.
Unlike most gasket material, GRAFOIL flexible graphite is electrically conductive. IT CANNOT BE USED FOR ELECTRICAL
ISOLATION. This should be considered in applications where electrical isolation is required.
If flexible graphite is ground or chopped up into dust, the airborne respirable nuisance dust has an ACGIH (TLV)
respirable exposure limit of 2.0 mg/m3. GRAFOIL flexible graphite also contains very low levels (<0.3%) of crystalline silica.
Crystalline silica has an ACGIH (TLV) respirable limit of 0.05 mg/m3. Personnel samples taken during cut-part fabrication
showed non-detectable levels of crystalline silica. There should be no silica hazards to product users or fabricators as long
as graphite dust levels are below the 2.0 mg/m3 respirable limit.
Please contact NeoGraf, GRAFOIL Products for the latest revision of the material safety data sheet (MSDS).
Material Compatibility
GRAFOIL flexible graphite is chemically resistant to attack from nearly all organic and inorganic fluids with the exception of
highly oxidizing chemicals and concentrated, highly oxidizing mineral acids. Homogeneous GRAFOIL sheet contains no resin
binders or organic fillers. Only graphite, which is highly resistant to chemical attack, is present. Also, because GRAFOIL
flexible graphite is all graphite, it can be used at high temperatures with most chemicals. When GRAFOIL laminates are used,
the non-graphite component will influence or limit the laminate's chemical resistance. Appendix 2 shows a list of materials that
have been evaluated for compatibility with graphite. Appendix 3 shows a list of materials that have been evaluated for compat-
ibility with the interlayer materials.
CARE MUST BE TAKEN, HOWEVER, IN SELECTING COMBINATIONS OF GRAFOIL FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE, INTERLAYER MATERIAL, AND
CHEMICALS. THE COMBINATIONS MAY NOT BE COMPATIBLE.
GRAFOIL flexible graphite is compatible with a number of unusual materials under unusual conditions. For example,
GRAFOIL Grades GTB, GTA, GHE, GHR, and GHV have been approved by a major chemical company for use with ethylene
oxide with no detrimental effect. These same grades have been approved by the U.S. Coast Guard for use with ethylene
oxide, propylene oxide, and butylene oxide. In addition, GRAFOIL flexible graphite can be used as a gasket with molten
aluminum at 1350°F (730°C) and 5000 psig (34.5 MPa) pressure and in piping conveying molten plastic at 600°F (315°C)
and 600 psig (4.1 MPa) pressure.
GRAFOIL Grades GTB, GHR, and GHE have been approved by a major industrial gas supplier, for use with both liquid and
gaseous oxygen service up to 2000 psig (13.7 MPa) pressure at a maximum temperature of 752°F (400°C). Produced as
both adhesive-backed crinkle tape and thread sealant, Grades GTF and GTH are approved for oxygen service up to 200
psig (1.4 MPa) and up to 140°F (60°C).
25
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Galvanic Corrosion
Galvanic corrosion is the result of an electrochemical reaction between two dissimilar metals, or between a metal and
graphite, in the presence of an electrically conductive fluid (such as water). The rate and degree to which the reaction
(pitting) will occur is dependent upon how widely separated the two materials are on the galvanic scale shown in Table XI.
Graphite or GRAFOIL flexible graphite is near the cathodic end of the galvanic scale, between silver and gold. The greater
the separation between the two materials in the table, the more rapid the corrosive attack on the anodic material.
Galvanic corrosion is not a problem unless an electronically conductive fluid is present.
Zirconium
GRAPHITE OR GRAFOIL
Gold
FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE
Platinum
CATHODIC
Figure 12 is a photograph of the surfaces of 420 stainless Some stainless steels are less vulnerable to pitting corrosion
steel after a seven-month corrosion test in deionized water. than others. The accepted ranking for some of the more
Grade 420 stainless steel is vulnerable to corrosion. common alloys is 17-4-PH, 316L, 316, 304, 347, and the most
Uninhibited flexible graphite was placed against the stainless vulnerable 410. A stagnant, conductive fluid can have a
steel sample on the left and the inhibited GRAFOIL flexible marked effect on galvanic corrosion. if the alloy is vulnerable
graphite Grade GTJ was placed against the stainless steel and conditions are conducive, then under the proper condi-
sample on the right. There was minimal visible pitting when tions pitting corrosion can take place in the presence of any
Grade GTJ was used; the maximum pit depth was 0.0007" material: asbestos, Teflon, even rubber. Cold, wet, stagnant
(0.018 m). When the uninhibited flexible graphite was used, films with good access to oxygen are most conducive to
there was extensive pitting with a maximum pit depth of corrosion. A condition where the system components are
0.0053" (0.13 mm). stored “wet” will increase the potential for galvanic corrosion.
26
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Usable pH Range
Homogeneous GRAFOIL sheet is unaffected by the pH range of 0-14. The nongraphitic component in a GRAFOIL laminate
(such as a steel inner layer) will influence and can limit the acceptable pH range for the laminate.
The functional properties, except for the “m” and “Y” factors and tightness factors are shown in Table XIV. All Standard
Industrial Grades of GRAFOIL sheets and gaskets are shown. The nominal thickness is displayed in the first column.
Sealability and the compressibility and recovery, creep relaxation were measured by the ASTM, BSI (British Standards
Institute) or DIN (Deutsches Institut Für Normung) method indicated in the table. The test results are compared to high
quality compressed asbestos sheet and compressed nonasbestos sheet.
Additional tests relating to the standard functional properties were also performed. These tests include: (1) creep at various
stress levels and the corresponding modulus of decompression (which relate to creep relaxation), (2) springback, (3) com-
pressive stress versus strain, and (4) temperature effect on load-bearing ability, which relates to the functional property
of compressibility and recovery.
Sealability
The sealability of GRAFOIL gaskets and sheets was measured by several methods. In ASTM Method F-37B both nitrogen gas
and Fuel “A” (iso octane) were used as the test fluid. For the non-interlayered GRAFOIL sheet (GTA, GTB, GHB and GHL),
compressed asbestos, and compressed nonasbestos, 1000 psi (6.9 kPa) was applied to the gasket during the test. For the
interlayered grades with a metal or polymer insert, the gasket was first flattened after die cutting using a load of 2000 psi
(13.8 MPa). The pressure was then removed and 1000 psi (6.9 MPa) reapplied as required in the ASTM Test. Sealability results
using the ASTM F-37B method are shown in table XII. Sealability of GRAFOIL sheets and gaskets as measured by the DIN 3535
method is also shown in Table XII. The DIN 3535 method uses a 90 mm OD x 50 mm ID test gasket. The clamping force on the
gasket is 4640 psi (32 MPa) and the internal nitrogen gas pressure is 580 psi (40 bars). The test is run at room temperature. This
test is a closer simulation of industrial gasket usage than is the ASTM test. In Table XII, sealability at 750°F (400°C) is shown. This
test uses the same condition as the DIN 3535 test except for the high temperature of the test. NeoGraf believes that this test is
more useful than the DIN 3535 test because many gasket applications are at elevated temperatures.
Results in Table XII show that thick gaskets will leak more than thinner gaskets. This is generally true for any material
because a thicker gasket will have more cross-sectional area for body leak paths. With nitrogen gas, GRAFOIL sheets and
gaskets leak 20 to 800times less than compressed asbestos gaskets of similar thickness. With Fuel “A”, GRAFOIL sheets
and gaskets leak 20 to 100 times less than compressed asbestos.
27
28
Table XII Typical Functional Test Performed on GRAFOIL Sheets and Gaskets Compressed Asbestos
and Compressed Nonasbestos Sheets and Gaskets
NOMINAL MEASURED BSI-F125 HI-TEMP(6)
F-38(4) CREEP NEOGRAF DIN 3535
GRADE THICKNESS THICKNESS F-37B(1) SEALABILITY F-36/806(3) CREEP DIN 3535
RELAXATION BLOWOUT TESTS(5) SEALABILITY
IN. (MM) IN. (MM) @400°C SEALABILITY
GHR(2)
1/16 (1.588) 0.0635 (1.6129) 35 < 0.5 40 16 <5 34.5+ /5000+ 1.5 2 0.4
1/32 (0.794) 0.0314 (0.7976) 40 < 0.5 25 30 <5 34.5+ /5000+
GHE
1/16 (1.588) 0.0538 (1.3665) 60 < 0.5 38 16 <5 34.5+ /5000+ 3.1 1.5 1.0
0.005 (0.127) 0.0063 (0.1600) 3 < 0.1 55 50 60 -
GTH
0.015 (0.381) 0.0161 (0.4089) 20 < 0.1 45 50 50 -
0.005 (0.127) 0.0610 (1.5494) 4 < 0.1 55 50 60 -
GTF
0.015 (0.381) 0.0160 (0.4064) 22 < 0.1 45 25 50 -
1/32 (0.794) 0.0321 (0.8153) 35 < 0.2 45 13 13 -
GHP
1/16 (1.588) 0.0621 (1.5773) 65 < 0.2 40 15 13 - 1.4 3.5 0.2
High Quality
1/16 (1.588) 0.0638 (1.6205) 516 1.2 15 55 45 35.5+ /5000+ 30 115
Com. Asbestos
High Quality
1/16 (1.588) 0.0601 (1.5265) 128 5.2 15 60 40 35.5+ /5000+ 0.1
Com. Nonasbestos
NOTE: All tests run per ASTM F-104 Type 5 Procedure for GRAFOIL flexible graphite unless noted
(1) For all laminates, 2000 psi (14 MPa) applied to flatten, then pressure reduced to 1000 psi (6.9 MPa) to test. Internal pressure used was 30 psi.
(2) GHR with 0.002" (0.0508 mm) stainless steel insert.
(3) Note change from ASTM F-36 to ASTM F-806 when laminates GHR and GHE are evaluated.
(4) Creep relaxation test performed at 212°F (100°C).
(5) Blowout test run at 11,000 psi (76 MPa) clamping force.
(6) Test run at 750°F (400°C).
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Creep Relaxation
Creep relaxation is the tendency of a material under load to move laterally in the flange, thereby reducing the applied
load on the gasket. Creep relaxation is measured by three methods: ASTM F-38B, British Standards Institute (BSI) F-125,
and Deutsches Institut Für Normung (DIN) 28090. When measured by the standard ASTM F-38B method, the creep relaxation
of GRAFOIL flexible graphite sheets and gaskets is less than 5%. Grades GTH and GTF are adhesive-backed products which
have a creep relaxation of only 7 to 8%. The polymer-inserted laminated product, Grade GHP, also demonstrates creep
relaxation values in the 7-8% range. Laminates with low creep relaxation are important for applications that require multiple
layers to achieve greater gasket thicknesses.
Because many materials are extremely sensitive to increases in temperature and load, creep relaxation must also be measured
at the higher temperatures representative of real-use applications. The BSI-125 and DIN 28090 creep tests are normally
conducted at 572°F (300°C). NeoGraf also conducts the BSI F-125 and DIN 28090 creep tests at 752°F (400°C) because of
the importance of knowing gasket creep at even higher temperatures. In the 570°F to 750°F (300°C to 400°C) temperature
range all GRAFOIL flexible graphite gasket grades that do not contain polymers have a creep relaxation between 2% and
2.5% when measured by either method. This is in stark contrast to many gasketing materials, where the degree of creep
relaxation increases dramatically with temperature and load. The stability of GRAFOIL sheet and laminate assures consistent
performance through a range of operating conditions, and makes it a better gasket material.
Table XIII Creep Relaxation for 1/16" (1.6 mm) Thick GRAFOIL Laminates
(1) Sample held at constant stress level for one hour at room temperature and deflection measured. Not ASTM F-38 method.
29
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
A graphical representation of the compressibility and recovery measurement is given in Figure 13. ASTM Method F-36 requires
that both the initial and final thicknesses (A and C, respectively) be measured with a load of 100 psi (0.69MPa) on the gasket.
For the compressibility measurement, the load is increased to 5000 psi (34.5 MPa) and the new gasket thickness (B) is measured.
The compressibility is calculated by dividing the decrease in the gasket thickness (A-B) by the original thickness (A), and
expressing the result as a percent. The recovery is calculated using the increase in the gasket thickness (C-B) when the 5000
psi (34.5 MPa) load is reduced. This value is divided by the decrease in the gasket thickness from the compressibility
measurement (A-B), and is again expressed as a percent.
psi x 1000
C 41 6
A A A 35 5
28 4
21 3
14 2
7 1
100 psi 5000 psi 100 psi
0
(690 KPa) (34.5 MPa) (690 KPa) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Strain – %
The density of GRAFOIL flexible graphite affects the compressibility and recovery values, as shown in Figure 14. A reduced
density material will have a higher compressibility and lower recovery, whereas a material with a higher density will have
lower compressibility and higher recovery.
GRAFOIL flexible graphite grades without metal or polymer layers normally have 35-45% compressibility and 10-15% recovery.
Grade GHE, interlayered with tang metal, has a slightly lower compressibility (and higher recovery) because the stainless steel
tangs are perpendicular to the surface of the GRAFOIL sheet and resist compression. The GRAFOIL sheet and laminates grades
have higher values for compressibility than either compressed asbestos or compressed nonasbestos because GRAFOIL flexible
graphite is designed to compact and seal. Because GRAFOIL flexible graphite has very low creep relaxation and is thermally
stable, recovery is virtually unaffected by service conditions. The result is an effective, long-term seal.
30
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Springback
The compressibility and recovery measurement described FIGURE 15 SPRINGBACK RESILIENCE OF
85 LBS/FT3 ( 1.36 G/CC) DENSITY GRAFOIL FLEXIBLE
above represents a single cycle where a load is applied and
GRAPHITE COMPRESSIVE STRESS VERSUS STRAIN
removed. However, GRAFOIL flexible graphite can recover,
or “springback” from the same compressive load millions MPa psi
89 10000
of time. A graphic representation of the single cycle
compressibility/recovery experiment and how it relates 82 9000
Compressive Stress
A,B, and C have the same meaning as those shown in the 48 7000
compressibility/recovery experiment. As the first compressive 41 6000
load is applied, the sample thickness decreases along the 35 5000
curve AB. Upon removing the load the thickness increases as 28 4000
shown by the line BC. Any subsequent loading of the sample, 21 3000
as long as it does not exceed point B, will still recover to D
14 2000
B
thickness C. If the applied load is increased further to point
7 1000
D, the material thickness decreases along the curve CBD. A
0 E
0
Removing the load now results in an increase in thickness 100 C 90 80 70 60
along the line DE. Repeated loading and unloading of the Strain % of Original Thickness
gasket will now cause the thickness to vary along the line
labeled DE.This repeated springback of GRAFOIL flexible
graphite results in excellent durability and performance for
seals exposed to thermal or mechanical cycling.
83 12000
Compressive Stress
69 10000
69 10000
55 8000
55 8000
41 6000
41 6000
28 4000
28 4000
14 2000
14 2000
0 0
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 0 0
Compressive Strain % 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Compressive Strain %
31
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Compressive Stress
compressed nonasbestos, and cork asbestos. These other 83 12000 Flexible Graphite
gasket materials bear much less stress than GRAFOIL flexible 69 10000
Compressed
graphite as temperature increases. Therefore, the non- 55 8000 Asbestos
graphite materials are limited with respect to the internal 41 6000 Compressed
Nonasbestos
pressure that can be sealed as the temperature increases. 28 4000
The clamping force must also be increased as the internal Cork
14 2000 Asbestostos
pressure is increased; this will be limited by the load-bearing
0 0
ability at the temperature required. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 °F
-18 38 93 149 205 260 316 371 427 483 538 °C
Temperature
If a joint is pressurized, an additional load will be required to maintain the integrity of the seal. The additional load
requirement is usually defined in terms of the internal pressure, multiplied by a maintenance factor, or “m.” All GRAFOIL
grades of sheet and laminates have a maintenance factor of 2. By comparison, 1/16" compressed asbestos sheet has a
maintenance factor of 2.75 and a yield factor of 3700 psi, (25.5 MPa), and therefore requires higher loads to seal.
“m” and “Y” values can be used to calculate the minimum net unit load needed to maintain a good seal. In general, the
minimum load required is equal to the yield factor “Y” plus “m” times the internal pressure (leak pressure). This relationship
is shown in Table XIV for the various grades of GRAFOIL flexible graphite. The typical recommended net unit load should
be twice these minimum values. The total flange clamping load must also overcome the hydrostatic end loads developed
by the internal pressure. Call your NeoGraf Applied Technology representative if you have any questions on determining
recommended bolt torques for a specific application.
32
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
GRADE Gb A GS
N/m2 PSI N/m2 PSI
GHB 6.69 970 0.384 0.00034 0.05
GHR 5.62 816 0.377 0.00046 0.066
GHT 5.62 816 0.377 0.00046 0.066
GHV 5.62 816 0.377 0.00046 0.066
GHW 5.62 816 0.377 0.00046 0.066
GHE 9.65 1400 0.324 0.00007 0.01
GHO 9.65 1400 0.324 0.00007 0.01
GHP 6.69 970 0.384 0.00034 0.05
33
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Blowout Tests
The ASTM test for gasket blowout (F-434) only evaluates the gasket to 1000 psi (6.9 MPa) internal pressure. Since GRAFOIL
flexible graphite gaskets are often used at much higher pressures, a more stringent 5000 psi (34.5 MPa) test was developed.
In this test, a standard size gasket with 2-5/8" OD and a 1-5/16" ID (6.67 cm OD and a 3.33 cm ID) was used. The test gasket
was held between heavy steel flanges that were machined to ASME B16.5 standards. This standard uses a cutting tool with a
1.52 mm (0.06") radius. Serrated-concentric grooves [24 to 40 per inch (9.4 to 15.7 per cm)] are machined in the faces to provide
a surface roughness of 125-250 micro-inch.
For the blowout test, flanges are placed in a small 30-ton (27 Mg) press, which is used to hold the flanges together. After the
clamping force is applied to the gasket, a partial vacuum is pulled on the inside of the gasket to remove air. The internal
pressure is applied with an air-over-water high-pressure pump. The pump is then started and the center of the gasket is
filled with water.
The clamping force (gasket unit load) needed for the 5000 psi (34.5 MPa) internal pressure (leak pressure) is 12,500 psi
(86.2 MPa) for grades GHE and GHR and 10,900 psi (75.1 MPa) for all other grades based o “m” and “Y” values. The internal
pressure is increased in 1000 psi (6.9 MPa) increments from 0 psi to 5000 psi (34.5 MPa) with a 30-second hold at each
pressure and a one-minute hold at 5000 psi (34.5 MPa). Since creep relaxation does not effect the test results when this
method is used, only a short hold period is required. None of the GRAFOIL grade gaskets evaluated “blew out” at 5000 psi
(34.5 MPa) internal pressure and the appropriate clamping force.
34
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Homogeneous Sheet
GRADE
TYPICAL SIZES DESCRIPTION TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
DESIGNATION
Sheet for fabrication. Used to make Ribbon
Rolls
Pack grade GTR and die molded rings for
0.005" (0.127 mm) to 0.030" (0.762 mm) Premium nuclear grade
nuclear valve and pump packings. Used as
Thick 24" (610 mm) & 39.4" monolithic sheet. Has
facing material to make high-purity
GTA (Premium (1.0 m) Width < 50 ppm max, leachable
laminated gaskets, nuclear form-in-place
nuclear grade) 100' (30.48 m) Long, chlo-rides, <630 ppm
gaskets and thread sealant tape (GTF).
Tol: ±0.002" (0.05 mm) Thickness sulfur and max. ash
Meets the GE Nuclear Specification
±1/16" (1.6 mm) Width content of 0.5%.
D50YP12 (Rev 2). Nuclear, fossil fuel,
+ 2.0' (610 mm)/-0 (0.0 mm) Length
aerospace and electronic applications.
Standard industrial
Sheet for fabrication. Used to make
grade monolithic sheet.
industrial Ribbon Pack grade GTZ and die
Rolls Meets material portion
molded rings for industrial valve and pump
0.005" (0.127 mm) to 0.060" (1.5 mm) of MIL-P-24503 B
packings. Used as facing material to make
Thick 24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m), specification. Has <1000
industrial laminated gaskets (GHB , GHL,
GTB (Standard 60" (1524 mm) Width ppm sulfur, and max. ash
GHE, GHR, GHO, GHT, GHV, GHW, GHP,
industrial grade) 100' (30.48 m) Long, content of 2.0%.
GRAFKOTE®), industrial form-in place
Tol: ±0.002" (0.05 mm) Thickness Contains a nonmetallic,
gaskets, and thread sealant tape (GTH).
±1/16" (1.6 mm) Width inorganic passivating
Used as filler material for spiral wound
+ 2.0' (610 mm)/-0 (0.0 mm) Length inhibitor to increase the
gaskets. Chemical, petro chemical,
resistance to corrosion
refinery, and metallurgical applications.
and oxidation.
Rolls
0.003" (0.076 mm) Thick
Same properties as Used in industrial heat sink and aerospace
24" (610 mm) Wide
GTY (Extra thin monolithic sheet applications. Can also be used as a thinner
100' (30.48 m) Long
flexible graphite) material but made from adhesive backed tape when combined with
Tol: ±0.0006" (0.015 mm) Thickness
a finer flake material. an adhesive backing.
± 1/16" (1.6 mm) Width
+ 2.0' (610 mm)/-0 (0.0 mm) Length
35
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Adhesive-Backed Sheet
GRADE
TYPICAL SIZES DESCRIPTION TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
DESIGNATION
Plain or crinkled
adhesive-backed GTB
Rolls
grade sheet containing Industrial form-in place gasketing and
0.005" (0.127 mm), 0.010" (0.254 mm),
less than 50 ppm thread sealant tape. Use flat tape for
0.015" (0.381 mm), 0.020" (0.508 mm),
leachable chlorides. straight runs or as pipe thread sealant and
GTH (Adhesive- 0.025" (0.635 mm), 0.030" (0.762 mm)
Bonded to a 0.0015" the crinkle for the curved lay. Can be used
backed sheet) Thick 24" (610 mm) & 39.4" (1.0 m) Wide
(0.0381 mm) thick in applications requiring up to two layers
Can also be slit to width with minimum
polymer with pressure of thickness. Also available in grade GTK
quantity equal to parent roll width.
sensitive adhesive using for oxidation and corrosion resistance.
100'(30.48 m) Length
a siliconized release
paper on one side.
36
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Non-Metallic Laminates
GRADE
TYPICAL SIZES DESCRIPTION TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
DESIGNATION
Gasket Sheet
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm)
1/8" (3.18 mm) Thick Adhesive-bonded and
Used in aerospace, chemical, and
GHA (All Also made to order thickness. thermally carbonized
metallurgical applications where high
Flexible Graphite) 24" (610 mm) Square laminate made from
purity gaskets are required.
Tol: ± 10% Thickness GTA sheet.
+ 1/2" (12.7 mm),-0" Width
+ 1/2" (12.7 mm),-0" Length
Gasket Sheet
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm),
Used in elevated temperature
1/8" (3.18 mm) Thick Adhesive-bonded and
industrial applications where outgas-
GHB (All Also made to order thickness thermally carbonized
sing of adhesives could present a
Flexible Graphite) 24" (610 mm) Square laminate made from
problem. Vacuum, chemical, and
Tol: ±10% Thickness GTB Sheet.
metallurgical applications.
+ 1/2" (12.7 mm),-0" Width
+ 1/2" (12.7 mm),-0" Length
Gasket Sheet
1/16" (1.59 mm),
1/8" (0.3 mm) Thick
24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m),
60" (1524 mm) Square
Used in industrial applications where
Tol: ±10% Thickness Industrial laminate
outgassing of adhesives is not a
GHL (All ±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width made from adhesively
problem and a metallic or nonmetallic
Flexible Graphite) ±1/8" (3.18 mm) Length bonding monolithic
interlayer is not needed. Chemical and
Rolls: GTB sheet.
metallurgical applications.
1/16" (1.59 mm) Thick
24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m) Width 100'
(30.48 m) Length
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width
+5.0' (1.52 m)/-0' Length
Gasket Sheet
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm),
1/8" (3.8 mm) Thick
24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m), General purpose industrial laminate
60" (152 4 mm) Square having low seating stress. Used as an
Tol: ±10% Thickness economical high volume gasket for the
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width GTB sheet thermally OEM (Original Equipment
GHP ±1/8" (3.18 mm) Length bonded on each side of Manufacturers) markets.
(Polymer insert) Rolls: a 0.0015" (0.0381 mm)
0.030" (0.76 mm), 0.060" (1.52 mm) thick polymer interlayer. Especially suitable where metallic
Thick 24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m) Wide inserted gaskets cannot be used. Also
25' (7.62 m), 50' (15.24m), used as a filler material for spiral
100' (30.48 m) Lengths wound gaskets.
Tol: ±10% Thickness
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width
+5.0' (1.52 m)/-0' Length
37
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
GRADE
TYPICAL SIZES DESCRIPTION TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
DESIGNATION
Gasket Sheet
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm),
Used where lower seating stress and
1/8" (0.3 mm) Thick GTB sheet thermally
handleability are needed. Very easy to
GHW (Woven 40" (1016 mm) x 60" (1524 mm) Sheet bonded to a high
cut “in house” as an emergency
glass fiber insert) 60" (1524 mm) x 60" (1524 mm) Sheet temperature woven
replacement gasket. Used where metal
Tol: ±10% Thickness glass fiber interlayer.
inserted gasket are not acceptable.
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Length
38
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
GRADE
TYPICAL SIZES DESCRIPTION TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
DESIGNATION
Gasket Sheet
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm),
1/8" (3.18 mm) Thick
24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m) and 60"
Industrial gasketing used where ease of
(1.5 m) Square
cutting, and large one piece gaskets are
39.4" (1.0 m) X 78.8" (2.0 m) Sheet
GTB sheet required. Stainless steel interlayer aids in
Tol: ±10% Thickness
GHE (0.004" adhesively providing improved handleability and
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width + 3/4" (19.1
316L/ 316 SS bonded to a blowout resistance. Recommended or heat
mm)/-1/8" (3.18 mm) Length Rolls:
tanged 0.004" (0.10 mm) exchangers with pass partitions. Will make a
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm),
metal insert) thick flat 316/316L high-strength, corrosion-resistant one-
1/8" (3.18 mm) Thick
SS foil. piece gasket for ASME 150 and 300 class
39.4" (1.0 m) Width
flanges. Chemical, petro-chemical and
100' (30.5 m), 250' (76.2 m),
refinery applications.
500' (152.4 m) Length
Tol: ±10% Thickness
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width
+ 5' (1.52 m)/-0' Length
Gasket Sheet
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm),
1/8" (3.18 mm) Thick
24" (610 mm), 39.4" (1.0 m) and
60" (1.5 m) Square
39.4" (1.0 m) X 78.8" (2.0 m) Sheet Industrial gasketing having a stainless steel
Tol: ±10% Thickness GTB sheet interlayer which provides handleability and
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width adhesively blowout resistance. Will make a high-strength,
GHR (0.002"
+ 3/4" (19.1 mm)/-1/8" (3.18 mm) Length bonded to a corrosion-resistant, one-piece gasket for
316/ 316L SS
Rolls: 0.015" (0.38 mm) ASME 150 and 300 class flanges. Excellent
flat foil)
1/32" (0.79 mm), 1/16" (1.59 mm), thick flat 316/316L replacement for flexible graphite coated
1/8" (3.18 mm) Thick SS metal. corrugated metal gaskets. Chemical,
39.4" (1.0 m) Width petrochemical and refinery applications.
100' (30.5 m), 250' (76.2 m),
500' (152.4 m) Length
Tol: ±10% Thickness
±1/8" (3.18 mm) Width
+5' (1.52 m)/-0' Length
39
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
GRADE
TYPICAL SIZES DESCRIPTION TYPICAL APPLICATIONS
DESIGNATION
Premium nuclear
Tubes grade thread sealant Nuclear certifiable, will meet GE Nuclear
GTS® (Thread Available in 125 gram, net wt paste made of a Specification D50YP12 (Rev 2). Has many
sealant paste) squeezable tubes, 12 tubes colloidal mixture of industrial applications as well, such as bolt
per carton. graphite flake and a thread lubricant / antiseize compound.
proprietary carrier.
40
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
GRAFOIL flexible graphite is resistant to attack from nearly all organic and inorganic fluids with the exception of highly
oxidizing chemicals and concentrated, highly oxidizing mineral acids such as nitric or sulfuric acids. GRAFOIL flexible
graphite is an extremely chemically resistant material. The classes of organic chemicals that should not be used with
GRAFOIL flexible graphite are those that are highly oxidizing, such as nitrates, persulfates, perbenzoate, and peroxides.
Unacceptable compatibility for inorganic chemicals would include molten sodium or potassium hydroxide and chlorine dioxide.
If these chemicals are used in a critical or dangerous process, we always recommend their evaluation in a test loop since
we do not have control over the environment or process in which the GRAFOIL flexible graphite gaskets are used.
It is much easier to list the chemicals which GRAFOIL flexible graphite is not compatible with instead of listing all of the
chemicals it is compatible. Table XVI lists the strong oxidizers in which GRAFOIL flexible graphite would not be compatible
and Table XVII lists the vast majority of chemicals which are compatible and could possibly come in contact with GRAFOIL
flexible graphite during industrial use.
Table XVI Strong Oxidizers (Not recommended with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite)
*GRAFOIL flexible graphite may be acceptable in specific temperature/concentration ranges. Call NeoGraf to discuss your specific application.
** See special limitation notes on page 30.
41
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII is a listing for many of the chemicals which are chemically compatible with GRAFOIL flexible graphite. The
information has been taken from various sources of information.
Again, if these chemicals are used in a critical or dangerous process, we always recommend their evaluation in a test loop,
since we do not have control over the environment or process in which the GRAFOIL gaskets are used.
Care must be taken of what combinations of GRAFOIL flexible graphite, interlayer material, chemicals, temperature and
concentration are used together. The combination may not be compatible.
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
42
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
43
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
DDT Solution (Toluene Solv) Dioctyl Phthalate Ethyl Ether (Ethyl Oxide)
44
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
45
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
Mesityl Oxide (Ketone) Miscella 20% Soya Oil Oil, Animal, Sperm
46
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
Oil, Diesel, #3D Oil, Vegetable, Rosin Plating Solutions (Not Chrome)
Oil, Diesel, #5D Oil, Vegetable, Soya Bean Poly Vinyl Acetate
Oil, Fed. Spec #9170, #9250l, #9370, #9500 Oleums Potash (Plant Liquor)
Oil, Fed. Spec #10, #20, #30 Orthodichloro Benzene Potash Alum
Oil, Fed. Spec SAE 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 90, 140, 250 Oxygen, Liquid and Gaseous (below 600°F) Potash, Sulfide
Oil, Fuel #1, #2, #3, #5A, #5B, #6 Paracymene Potassium Bicarbonate
47
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
Sal Ammoniac (Ammonium Chloride) Sodium Sulfate Tar & Ammonia w/Water
48
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XVII Chemicals which are Compatible with GRAFOIL Flexible Graphite (continued)
CHEMICAL REAGENTS
49
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 Comparative Chemical Resistance Chart of Gasket Metals to Various Corrosive Media
The charts on the following pages will serve as a rough guide in the selection of the proper interlayer alloy for a given type
of corrosive service. The main value of this data is in narrowing down the choice of alloy to be used in the gasket laminate.
In the tables, the effects of complicating factors such as aeration, galvanic action, contamination and erosion are not
taken into account. In some instances, the data was compiled from the availability of only a few sources.
For these reasons, the information in the tables is not to be construed as a recommendation either for or against using
any alloy as a gasket interlayer under any given conditions. The only reliable method for making a final choice of a material
is actual field testing of the alloy. Special attention should be made as to what combinations of GRAFOIL flexible graphite
and metallic interlayer materials are used in respect with the chemical media when used together. The combination in a
laminate form may not be compatible.
Appendix 3
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
ACETIC ACID
A A B B B A U A
- ROOM TEMP
ACETIC ANHYDRIDE
A A B B A A B A
-RM TEMP
ACETONE A A A A A A A A
ALUM CHLORIDE
U B - B B U U C
-RM TEMP
ALUM FLUORIDE
B B - B B U B -
-RM TEMP
ALUMINUM SULFATE B B B B B A U A
AMMONIA (ANHYDROUS) A A A B B A B A
AMMONIUM CHLORIDE U U A B B B B A
AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE B U A U U A A A
AMMONIUM NITRATE A U B U U A A A
AMMONIUM PHOSPHATE A B B B B A U A
AMMONIUM SULFATE U B B B B A A A
AMYL ACETATE A A A A A A B A
50
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 (continued)
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
ANILINE B A B B B A A A
BARIUM CHLORIDE B B A - B A B A
BEER A A A A A A A A
BENZENE A A A A B A A A
BENZOL A A B A B A A A
BORAX A A A A - A A A
BORIC ACID A A B B B A U -
BROMINE A A A A A U U A
BUTYL ALCOHOL A A A A A A A A
CALCIUM CARBONATE A A A A A A A A
CALCIUM CHLORIDE B A A B B A A A
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE B A B B B B A A
CALCIUM
U U U U B A U A
HYPOCHLORITE
CARBOLIC ACID A A B B B A U A
CARBON
B B A A A A U A
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLORINE-DRY A A A A A U A A
CHLORINE-WET U U B B B U U A
CHROMIC ACID B U B U U A - A
CITRIC ACID A A B B B A U A
51
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 (continued)
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
COPPER CHLORIDE U U U U U B B -
COPPER SULFATE U B B B B A U A
CRUDE OIL A B - B - A A A
ETHER A A B B B A A A
ETHYL ACETATE A A A A A A A A
ETHYL CHLORIDE B A - B B A A C
FERRIC CHLORIDE U U U U U U U A
FERRIC SULFATE B B U U U A U A
FORMALDEHYDE B A A A A A B C
FORMIC ACID U A B B B A U A
FURFURAL A A B A B A A A
GASOLINE A A A A A A A A
GLUE A A A A A A A A
GLYCERIN A A A A A A A A
HYDROBROMIC ACID U U U U U U U A
HYDROCHLORIC
U U U U U U U A
ACID < 100° F
HYDROCHLORIC
U U U U U U U C
ACID > 100° F
HYDROCYANIC ACID A C - B - A B -
52
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 (continued)
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
HYDROFLUORIC ACID U U A A A U U C
HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID - U B - B U U -
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE A C B B B A U A
HYDROGEN SULFIDE A A B B B A U A
KEROSENE A A A A A A A A
LACTIC ACID B A B U U B U A
LINSEED OIL A B A A A A A A
LYE (CAUSTIC) U B A A A A A -
MANGANESE
A A B B B A - -
CARBONATE
MANGANESE CHLORIDE U B B B B A U -
MAGNESIUM
B A A A A A - -
CARBONATE
MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE B B A A A A B A
MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE U A A A A A A A
MAGNESIUM NITRATE A B B B - A B A
MAGNESIUM SULFATE A A B B B A A C
METHYLENE CHLORIDE U U U U U U B -
MERCURIC CHLORIDE U U U U U U U C
MERCURY U U A B B A A A
MURIATIC ACID U U U U U U U A
NITRIC ACID-DILUTED U U U U U A U A
53
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 (continued)
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
NITROUS ACID B B B - - A - -
NITROUS OXIDE A A U A U - B -
OLEIC ACID A A A B B A B A
OXALIC ACID B A B B B A U A
PETROLEUM
A U A A A A A A
OILS-CRUDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID U B B B B A U A
PICRIC ACID A C U U U A A -
POTASSIUM BROMIDE A B A B A B A
POTASSIUM CARBONATE B A B A B A B C
POTASSIUM CHLORIDE B B B B B A A A
POTASSIUM CYANIDE U U B B B A A -
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE U U B A A A B C
POTASSIUM SULFATE A A B B B A A -
POTASSIUM CYANIDE U U B B B A A -
SEA WATER B B B B B A B A
SEWAGE B B - - - A B A
SILVER NITRATE U U B U U A U -
SOAPS B B A A A A A -
SODIUM BICARBONATE B A A A A A B A
54
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 (continued)
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
SODIUM BISULFATE B B B B B A U C
SODIUM BROMIDE B A B B B A B -
SODIUM CARBONATE B A B B B A A A
SODIUM CHLORIDE B A A A A A A A
SODIUM HYDROXIDE U B A A A A A A
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE U U U U U A U A
SODIUM NITRATE A A A B B A A C
SODIUM PEROXIDE A B B B B A B C
SODIUM PHOSPHATE A A B B B A B A
SODIUM SILICATE B A - B - A A A
SODIUM SULFATE A A B B B A A A
SODIUM SULPHIDE U U B - B - A A
STEAM A B A A A A A A
STEARIC ACID A A B B B A B -
STANNIC CHLORIDE U U B B B A - -
SULFUR CHLORIDE U A - B B U B -
SULFUR DIOXIDE-DRY A A A A A A A A
SULFURIC ACID -
B B U B B B U A
<10% - COLD
SULFURIC ACID -
U U U B U U U A
<10% - HOT
55
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Appendix 3 (continued)
A – Good Resistance B – Moderate Resistance C– Poor Resistance U – Unsatisfactory - No Data Available
SULFURIC ACID-FUMING A U U U U A B C
SULFUROUS ACID B U U U U B A A
SULFUR-MOLTEN A U A U U A A U
TANNIC ACID B A B B B A U A
TARTARIC ACID B A B B B A U A
VINEGAR B B A A A A B A
ZINC CHLORIDE U B B B B U B A
ZINC SULFATE B A B B B A B A
56
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
For graphite to a temperature of 1400°C (2552°F), the product of thermal conductivity and the electrical resistivity (the
reciprocal of the conductivity) at a given temperature is a straight line function of 1/K.
Because of this relationship, anything that effects the electrical conductivity also effects the thermal conductivity.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Conductivity (k) is a property measured within a material.
The thermal conductivity of a material is defined as the quantity of heat transferred within that material per unit area per
unit temperature gradient. This is written:
k = WL
AΔT
where k is the thermal conductivity, W is the heat transferred per unit time, A is the area at right angles to the direction of
heat flow, L is the length of the sample along which the heat flows, and ΔT is the temperature differential along that length.
Some handbook values for k are shown in Figure 19. Thermal conductivity (in W/mK) ranges from 0.02 for a down comforter,
to 0.2 for paper, to 15 for stainless steel, to 210 for aluminum, and to 420 for silver.
15
4 Aluminum Carbon Eider Down
0.6 210 W/m•K 4 W/m•K 0.02 W/m•K
0.2 Graphite Brick
0.11 125 W/m•K 0.6 W/m•K
0.1
0.02 Iron Rubber
0.01 0.1 1 10 700 1,000 75 W/m•K 0.2 W/m•K
Log Scale Thermal Conductivity-W/m•K
57
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Heat Transmission
Overall heat transmission coefficient (U) is a property having identical units to thermal conductivity but measured on a
composite structure.
When measuring energy (heat) transfer through a composite structure, the thermal resistance (R) can be looked upon as a
series resistance, and every change in thermal resistance must be included. For example, there are five components to
model heat transmission from one aluminum block to another: (1) aluminum, (2) the aluminum oxide surface coating, (3)
contact fluid (gas or liquid) separating imperfect surfaces, (4) the aluminum oxide surface coating, and (5) aluminum.
1 1
k comp = U = =
RT R 1 + R 2 + R 3 + R4 + R 5
The heat transmission for aluminum to aluminum may be Flexible graphite has low contact resistance and, like gold,
less than 1% of the k depending upon the surface condition does not have a stable oxide coating.
and pressure at the contacting surfaces.
For a GRAFOIL Grade GHR gasket with a metal interlayer, there
Metals used in gasket and flange construction generally are 13 thermal resistors in the heat transmission model: five
have stable oxide surface coatings. The oxide and/or the from the above paragraph plus (6) GRAFOIL sheet (7) point-
“fluid” layer (that is, the point-to-point contact between two point contact resistance, (8) metal oxide, (9) metal, (10) metal
less than perfect surfaces) presents most of the resistance to oxide, (11) contact resistance, (12) GRAFOIL sheet, and (13)
heat flow. contact resistance. For this system,
1
U = RTwhere RT equals the total of the 13 resistances
Single Layer
sample of Grade GHE included for comparison. Based on 10
k (the thermal conductivity within a material), steel and Steel
Single Layer
aluminum are 8 and 40 times higher in through the 1
thickness thermal conductivity than GRAFOIL sheet. GHE*
Triple Layer
However, the U (overall heat transmission) for GRAFOIL .0
GRAFOIL GHE
gaskets. The gasket samples were GRAFOIL GHE, GRAFOIL
10
GHR, aramid fiber-reinforced with metal foil interlayer, and Lam/Steel
three layers of stainless steel. 1
GRAFOIL GHR
.0
.01
*GHE=GRAFOIL GTB-perforated steel-GRAFOIL GTB measured at points 0 250 500 750 1,000
only-NeoGraf system Contact Pressure – PSI
58
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Note that heat transmission increases with increasing load and that GRAFOIL GHR is better at transferring energy at
higher load than GRAFOIL GHE. This is probably due to the tangs or protrusions resulting from the perforations keeping the
GRAFOIL facing from conforming as well to the mating surfaces. The three layers of uncoated stainless steel are poorest at
transferring energy, possibly because the surfaces are rigid and non-conforming and provide few points of contact and lots
of “fluid” resistance.
If the data is extended to a load of 200 psi (1.4 MPa) and GRAFOIL GHR conducts one unit of energy, the GRAFOIL GHE
would conduct 0.5 units, aramid 0.08 units, and laminated steel only 0.07 units of energy.
Data are shown in Table XVIII for electrical contact resistance between manufactured graphite and other materials. In general,
a greater than 10-fold reduction in resistance is achieved as clamping load is raised from 25 to 1000 psi (0.17-6.9 MPa).
The values must be considered as typical only since the absolute electrical contact resistance for any given situation will
depend upon the individual pieces and their exact surface condition.
Table XIX is a list of conversion factors; if you do not like the units reported, for example, W/m•K, and prefer “cal” units,
multiply “W” by 0.002389 to convert.
59
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
APPENDIX 5 GENERAL GASKET DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF GRAFOIL FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE
What is a gasket?
A gasket is a material or combination of different materials usually combined or “laminated” with one another, and placed
between two stationary members of a flanged connection for the specific purpose of preventing a liquid or gaseous leak into
the atmosphere. The gasket material selected must be chemically compatible with the internal medium, compatible with the
metallic valves, piping and pumps, and able to withstand the application temperatures and pressures.
Gaskets are used to provide the sealing element in flanged connections and should not be used to correct any design
flaws or shortcomings within the engineered piping system.
When a gasket is compressed, it must be capable of overcoming two main types of flanged imperfections. It must be able
to flow into minor flange surface imperfections and it must be capable of withstanding non-parallel flanges, distortions
and deep surface scorings caused by continued maintenance of the flanged connections. Therefore, sufficient force must
be available for pre-load to initially seat the gasket. In order to ensure the maintenance of the seal throughout the life
expectancy of the assembly, sufficiently high stresses must remain on the gasket surface to ensure that the leakage does
not occur over time.
The resultant bolt load on the gasket materials should always be greater than the hydrostatic end force acting against it in
order to effect a seal. The hydrostatic end force is the force produced by the internal pressure that acts to separate the
flanges from each other.
Gasket Selection
Not much thought was given to gasketing applications, testing or differentiation prior to the decade of the 60's when
asbestos gasketing was predominantly the sealing material of choice by virtue of availability. Compressed asbestos sheet
was considered the performance standard for nonmetallic gasketing materials used in valves and flanges. Asbestos was
well known and dependable material with many years of operating data.
The 1980's brought significant changes to the way everyone thought about and used gasketing materials. Gasketing and
bolted joint behavior became a focal point when in the United States, and elsewhere around the world, asbestos became
suspect as a health hazard. Instantly, users began the search for nonasbestos materials and at the same time, environmental
regulations got tougher. Suddenly, flanged connections were looked at as a source of fugitive emissions and by and large,
gasket users and manufacturers alike were caught off guard by the impact of this asbestos issue.
As the availability of asbestos gaskets decreased, a multitude of substitute products claiming comparable performance to
asbestos appeared in the market. Every manufacturer of gasketing material began producing alternative asbestos-free
materials whose room temperature and short-term properties were almost identical to asbestos. Users of these new
products saw varying degrees of success and some notable failures, especially for elevated temperature services where
detailed long term performance data was lacking. It now became very clear that there were no meaningful testing standards or
qualification procedures for these new materials due to years of inattention while asbestos was the standard.
All of the claims of the so-called nonasbestos gasketing materials were made largely on short-duration, in-house quality
type property testing. End users became alarmed when they experienced disappointing performance, including some
major failures resulting in loss of life and property.
Currently, new gasket materials and combinations of materials are being manufactured regularly as the trend for
asbestos substitutes and tighter gaskets improve. This rapidly changing environmental climate together with higher
performance needs continue to make gasket selection a challenge.
60
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
There are many factors that effect the sealability of a flanged connection so the selection of a gasket material must
be such that:
1. The material will withstand the pressures exerted upon the gasket. This includes the tensile, crush strength, resilience
and the amount of seating stress required to effect an initial seal.
2. The gasket must satisfactorily resist the entire temperature range in which it will be exposed to. This includes the heat
resistance, thermal conductivity, creep relaxation at elevated temperatures and thermal cycling of the gasket.
One of the most important considerations in the selection of a gasket material is its response to elevated temperature
service. Tensile strength, blowout resistance, creep relaxation, recovery, and general sealability are all affected by
increases in temperature. This has become more and more clear to end users in recent years who attempt to replace
the old compressed asbestos gasketing from their facilities.
Many of the asbestos substitutes consist of a clay or other inorganic base material which is added as a filler for improved
strength, flexibility, and improved processing. Aramid, acrylic, glass, and cellulose fibers have been added as well, but not
to the same degree in which the asbestos fiber contributed to the overall composition of the gasket material. Only glass
has the heat resistance of asbestos, but it lacks the intertwining compressible structure of asbestos.
Some of the proposed substitutes are equal or even better than asbestos at room or moderately elevated temperatures,
however, they tend fail mechanically when temperatures are raised. Elastomeric bonded sheet materials consist of a base
polymer with the addition of vulcanizing agents, fillers, chopped fibers, pigments and various additives. Table XX shows
the temperature limits of various elastomeric compounds.
61
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
3. The gasket must withstand corrosive attack from the confined medium. This is the chemical resistance and workable pH
range of the gasket material.
Included in Appendix 3 - Comparative Chemical Resistance Chart of Gasket Metals to Various Corrosive Media - are some
general recommendations for metallic materials against various corrosive media. Although this chart gives general
recommendations, there are many additional factors that have an influence on the corrosion resistance of a particular
semi-metallic material at operating conditions. Among them are:
• The concentration of the corrosive agent can be tricky and will have an effect on the gasket selection. A full 100%
concentration of a corrosive agent may not necessarily be more corrosive than those of dilute proportions, and of
course, the reverse is also true.
• The purity of the corrosive agent is another factor to consider. For example, a solution of dissolved oxygen in what one
would consider pure water, may cause a rapid oxidation in steam service generation equipment at high temperatures.
• The temperature of the corrosive agent will accelerate the corrosive attack. In general, higher temperatures of corrosive
agents will cause this to occur.
As a consequence of the above three influential factors that have an influence on the corrosion resistance, it is often
necessary to “field test” materials for resistance to corrosion under normal operating conditions to determine if the
material selected will have the required resistance to corrosion. The only reliable method for making a final choice of a
materials is actual field testing of the alloy with the chemical medium.
4. In addition to the above, considerations associated with the decision as to which grade or style of gasket to use for a
particular joint also includes:
• As a replacement for a 1/16" thick asbestos composition • Availability.
gasket, is a joint design review needed? • Purchase price of the gasket.
• Ease of installation. • Basic design considerations.
Gasket Composition
Gaskets can be categorized into three main segments or styles; nonmetallic, semimetallic and metallic types. It should be noted
that the mechanical characteristics, performance and seating stresses of a gasket will vary, depending upon the type of gasket
selected and the materials from which it is manufactured. Although the mechanical properties are an important factor when
considering a gasketing material, the primary selection of a gasket is influenced by the temperature and pressure of the media
to be contained together with the corrosive nature of the application.
There are many factors that effect the performance of a flanged connection and a gasket is nothing more than another variable
in the “big picture” equation. In addition to the gasket properties, the overall application detail and parameters listed in Table
XXI should be considered as well.
Nonmetallic gaskets are usually composed of compressed sheet materials that are used in low pressure class applications.
They are particularly suitable for a wide range of general and corrosive chemical and steam applications. The products listed
in Table XXII are typically referred to as soft sheet gasketing materials.
GRAFKOTE GRAFOIL flexible graphite and 0.0015" thick polymer coated surface
A semimetallic gasket usually consists of both nonmetallic and metallic materials. The metal generally provides the
strength, and blow out resistance while the nonmetallic facing material provides resilience and sealing. These gaskets can
be used for high pressure and high temperature applications.
GHT GRAFOIL flexible graphite and 0.002" thick alloy C-276 foil
Semimetallic gaskets also include GRAFOIL flexible graphite filled spiral wound and double jacketed gaskets.
Metallic gaskets can be fabricated from a single metal or a combination of metallic materials in a variety of shapes and
sizes. These gaskets are generally suited for very high temperatures and pressure applications. Very high loads are
required to seat an all-metallic gasket and they are usually found in the form of ring type joints, lens rings, welded
gaskets and clamp joints.
63
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Under certain special conditions where a spiral wound or double jacketed gasket would not be suitable for an application,
semimetallic gasket grade GHE has been used successfully in applications as high as 1,500 psig (10.3 MPa) and with coincident
temperatures up to 650°F (343°C). It is normally recommended to consult with the manufacturer for these applications over
and above 300 class flanges.
One must also consider: 1) the nature of the fluid or gaseous media and the consequence of leakage from a health, safety
and environmental standpoint, 2) the cost of a possible shutdown to replace the gasket, 3) if a metal or metal-reinforced
gasket would generally be considered desirable, 4) if the joint design should be of the confined type (e.g. male/ female,
tongue and groove) to further provide blowout protection, and 5) if the gasket should be made from a fire safe material.
Considerations to the history of the joint should not be overlooked. How does the proposed replacement of the gasket
compare with the gasket that has given reliable, leak-free service? How about unreliable, leak-prone service? If the later case
prevails, does a careful review of the joint system design indicate that a gasket change alone will rectify the problem? The
gasket is an important part of, but only a part of, the complete joint system.
The question of which type of gaskets are appropriate to use in gasketed joints needs further clarification of the application
itself. Thermal cycling, thermal shocks, vibration and erosion need to be considered when designing a flanged connection.
The flatness of the flange surface is essential to good gasketing practice. If gasketed surfaces are perfectly flat under operating
conditions, then the average unit load on the gasket is also the minimum unit load. If the flange surface is not flat while in
service, the gasket unit load can be less at some point or points than the amount required to seal operating or test pressures.
In general, if a 0.001" (0.03 mm) thick feeler gage cannot be inserted anywhere around the circumference of the flange
faces when they are brought together, then a gasket as thin as 0.015" (0.38 mm) can be used to seal this flange. If this
criteria cannot be met or if the flanges warp under loaded conditions, then a thicker gasket is required.
64
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Flange Design:
Paying attention to details of flange design is critical when designing a gasket for a jointed connection. The very configuration of
the flange, the available bolt load and construction materials all have an effect on the gasket selection. The basic dimensions
of a gasket are taken from the flange configuration and the total bolt load available are the basis for calculating whether the
gasket will seal or not. Then the possibility of corrosion enters the picture when looking at the compatibility between the
flange and the gasketing material.
If corrosion is a possibility, NeoGraf Solutions recommends using one of our inhibited grades (GTB, GTK, GTJ) as the
gasket facing.
When a jointed connection is designed for service, there are basically three forces that become critical in affecting the
sealing characteristics of a gasket.
END FORCE This is the pressure of the confined gases or liquids which tend to separate the flange faces.
This comes from the available bolting or other means which applies force upon the flange faces
GASKET UNIT LOAD
to compress the gasket.
INTERNAL PRESSURE This is the force which can move, permeate or bypass the gasket.
In taking the three above factors into consideration, one of the most important hurdles to overcome is the initial pre-load force
applied to the jointed connection. This force must be enough to seat the gasket to the flange faces and it must be enough to
compress and conform the gasket material into any surface imperfections or misalignment. It must also be sufficient enough to
compensate for the internal pressures acting against the flange assembly, commonly referred to as the hydrostatic end force.
Lastly, the applied force must be sufficient enough to maintain a correct amount of residual load upon the jointed connection.
Call NeoGraf's Applied Technology team to assist you in determining the correct loads to seal a GRAFOIL gasket.
Ease of Installation:
One should consider the location and position of the joint and the associated gasket handling requirements, and raise
these questions; How will the gasket be centered and held in position? Should a male/female or tongue and groove facing
be provided to minimize installation problems in the field? Consider the weather conditions. Will the tendency of the
gasket to flex and/or bend create installation problems under the expected access and environmental conditions? Will
working (e.g. joint access) conditions detract from the likelihood of getting a proper level of uniform pre-load on the
bolts? Will a tube bundle have to be removed or will major vessel sections be separated (with attendant pipe spool
removal or separation) to replace a gasket?
It is likely that in many cases the ease of handling and/or replacement will be the dominant consideration(s) in the gasket
selection for a particular joint.
NeoGraf recommends using a light spray of 3M Super 77 adhesive to hold a gasket in the correct position, if necessary,
while assembling a joint. Do not use tape to hold a gasket in position.
Availability:
One needs to consider if the gasket is readily available from plant stores or from a local supplier? Must the gasket be
ordered from an out-of-town gasket manufacturer, thus requiring significant lead time to obtain in time for the outage?
Can overtime/hotshot transport of a gasket be used to expedite the delivery?
In estimating the total cost associated with a gasket replacement, one must consider the unit shutdown costs, labor to
dismantle the equipment, gasket cost, and labor to reassemble and leak test the joint.
Almost always, the purchase price of the gasket itself, even the most expensive, is a very small percentage of the total cost
of installing the gasket. Therefore, the gasket which initially costs more, but withstands handling abuse better, is easier to
install, and is more forgiving of joint and joint make-up deficiencies (and hence less likely to need retorquing or replacement),
often proves to be the most economical choice over the long run.
65
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The gasket wall thickness, being the width of the gasket measured from the ID to the OD, usually opens up the discussion
to controversy and past practices. Studies have shown only a very weak correlation between GRAFOIL gasket width and
sealability. Handleability and flange size constraints usually dictate the gasket width. Very narrow width (1/4" or less) GHR
or GHE gaskets that are cut with a steel rule die may require flattening after punching to reduce the rollover of the insert
metal around the edges of the gasket. Typical gasket widths are often based on the nominal joint diameter.
≤ 24" 1/2"
> 24" < 48" 3/4"
> 48" < 96" 1"
> 96" 1 1/4"
The “Y” stress factor is the initial gasket stress or surface pressure required to pre-load or seat the gasket to prevent leakage in
the joint without any internal pressure. We know that the actual seating stress is a function of the flange surface finish, gasket
material, gasket density, gasket thickness, fluid or gas to be sealed and the allowable leak rate. The need for varied “Y”
values is determined by variables such as rough or irregular flange finish, the ease or harshness of containing fluids and
the specified allowable leak rates in the joint.
Appendix II, Section VIII, of the Boiler Code under paragraph VA-49 makes the statement; “the “m” factor is a function of
the gasket material and construction.” Another interpretation of “m” is the ratio of the residual gasket contact pressure to
the internal pressure required for a gasket material not to leak. It can be viewed as the safety margin above the internal
pressure required to affect a gasket seal. Two things must occur in order to maintain a satisfactory ratio of gasket contact
pressure to the internal pressure. The flanges must be sufficiently rigid to prevent unwanted unloading of the gasket due
to flange rotation when the internal pressure is introduced and the bolts must be adequately pre-stressed. The Boiler Code
recognizes the importance of pre-stressing the bolts sufficiently to withstand the hydrostatic test pressure. Appendix S, in the
Code, discusses this problem in greater detail.
We know from experience that when the system is pressurized, the contact pressure on the gasket material is reduced,
depending upon the elastoplastic behavior of the gasket and its relationship to the elasticity of the joint. So therefore, the
contact pressure on the gasket must generally be larger than the internal pressure in the system.
The ratio of contact pressure to contained pressure is called the “m” factor, and may be different for various types of
gaskets as suggested below.
66
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XXVI “m” Factor and “Y” Seating Stress for Various Gasket Materials
GASKET MATERIAL THICKNESS ASME “M” FACTOR ASME “Y” STRESS (PSI)
The “m” and “Y” factors, respectively, claim to define the amount of assembly stress which must be applied to a gasket
and the amount of residual stress that must be provided to prevent the gasket from leaking after the system has been
pressurized. Both of these gasket stresses – initial seating stress and the in-service stress– are equally important.
Bolt Loading:
Consideration must be given to the effective stretching length of the bolts. Is the effective stretching length such that the
joint will be unacceptably sensitive to expected bolt load relaxation due to embedment losses? Although GRAFOIL flexible
graphite has the most favorable creep relaxation characteristics of any gasket material available today, there will still be
some creep relaxation of the gasket and the other highly stressed parts in the bolted joint.
When an axial tensile load (stress) is applied to a bolt in a bolted-joint system, the bolt will stretch just as any elastic
material will. The amount of stretch (ΔL) is directly proportional to the effective stretching length. In a bolted-joint
system, we use the distance between mid thickness of the nuts as the effective stretching length. Also, the bolt strain ΔL
over L is proportional to the tensile load (stress) on it, with the constant of proportionality being the modulus of elasticity,
E. This is know as Hooke's Law.
Bolts in most customer-designed joints should be pre-loaded to 2 times the ASME Code allowable stress at room tem-
perature. This factor is derived by using a factor of 1.5 for the hydrostatic test condition and a factor of 1.3 to cover for the
pre-load losses due to gasket, thread, nut-to-flange, etc., embedment. This 1.3 factor is also intended to cover the fact
that the actual response of the flanged system to the loading departs somewhat from the theoretical analysis model.
Combining these factors, the total pre-load factor becomes 1.5 X 1.3 = 1.95, say 2.
ΔL (in) = Stress on bolt Root Area (psi) X Effective Stretching Length (in)
Modulus of Elasticity (psi)
When we have additional losses in a joint system which occur over time while the joint is in service, such as reduction of
gasket thickness, this reduces the amount of stretch in the bolt, ΔL, in proportion to the loss of thickness. By rearranging
the above formula, and solving for stress on bolt,
67
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
As an example, assume a SA-193, GR-B7 bolt with an effective stretching length of seven inches. The modulus of elasticity is
29.7 X 106 psi and the Code allowable design stress is 25,000 psi. The recommended initial pre-load would be 2 (25,000) = 50,000
psi, and the bolt stretch would be 50,000 X 7 = 0.012".
29.7 X 106
Assuming the total design embedment loss does take place, the resulting initial stretch in the bolt will reduce to 0.012/1.3
or approximately 0.009 inches. If the gasket has an additional loss in thickness during operation of 0.001 inches, the final
bolt stress is (0.009-0.001) X 29.7 X 106/7 = 33,900 psi which is comfortably above the design value of 25,000 psi. Therefore,
this joint would not be expected to leak during normal operation but very likely would leak during a subsequent hydrotest
at 1.5 X MAWP since the theoretical required bolt pre-stress would be approximately 1.5 X 25,000 or 37,500 psi.
Obviously, the sensitivity to embedment loss can be reduced by increasing the effective stretching length of the bolts,
which in turn can be accomplished by adding a segmented backing ring behind each flange (this is considered better
practice than either adding washers or a heavy tube over each bolt at the back of the flanges). For example, had the
effective stretching length of the bolts in the above example been 12 inches instead of seven inches, the comparative
values in the above example would be as follows:
This sensitivity analysis clearly shows the advantages of a relatively long stretching length, and, conversely, illustrates the
disadvantages of joints with relatively short bolts. Clearly, there are occasions when adding backing rings are needed to
ensure reliable, leak-free performance.
The initial bolt load required to seat a gasket sufficiently to hold any pressure at all is defined in this equation:
Wm2 = π b GY
The “b” in this formula is defined as the effective gasket width, G is the gasket diameter at the effective width, and “Y” is
defined as the minimum seating stress in psi that depends upon the type of gasket (see Table XXIX for a complete list of
symbols and definitions). It should be noted that these are suggested values for “Y”, not mandatory.
The required operating bolt load must be at least sufficient, under the most severe operating conditions, to contain the
hydrostatic end force and in addition, to maintain a residual compression load on the gasket that is sufficient to assure a
tight joint. ASME defines this bolt load in the following equation:
Wm1 = π G2 P + 2 b π G m P
4
68
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Where P = internal design pressure and where m = maintenance factor for the gasket material. This equation states the
minimum required bolt load for operating conditions and is the sum of the hydrostatic end force plus a residual gasket
load on the contact area of the gasket times a factor times internal pressure. Stated another way, this equation requires
the minimum bolt load be such that it will maintain a residual unit compressive load on the gasket area that is greater
than internal pressure when the total load is reduced by the hydrostatic end force.
After Wm1 and Wm2 are calculated, the minimum required bolt area A m is determined as follows:
WM1
AM1 = S where Sb is the allowable bolt stress at operating temp, and
b
WM2
AM2= Sa
where Sa is the allowable bolt stress at ambient temp
Bolts are then selected so that the actual bolt area Ab is equal to or greater than Am
AB = (Number of Bolts) x (Minimum Cross-Sectional Area of Bolt in Square In)
Ab greater than or equal to Am
At this point, it is important to realize that the gasket must be capable of carrying the entire compressive force applied by
the bolts when pre-stressed unless provisions are made to utilize a compression stop in the flange design or by the use of
a compression gauge ring.
The maximum unit load S g (max) on the gasket bearing surface is equal to the total maximum bolt load in pounds divided
by the actual sealing area of the gasket in square inches.
A bS a
Sg (max) = π [(OD)2 - (ID)2]
4
Except as noted, the following symbols and definitions below are those given in Appendix II of the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vellel Code, Section VIII.
69
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Ab Actual total cross-sectional area of bolts at root of thread or section of least diameter under stress, square inches.
Am Total required cross-sectional area of bolts, taken as the greater of Am1 or Am2, square inches.
Total cross-sectional area of bolts at root of thread or section of least diameter under stress, required for the
A m1
operating conditions.
A m2 Total cross-sectional area of bolts at root of thread or section of least diameter under stress, required for gasket seating.
ID Inside Diameter.
Width, in inches, used to determine the basic gasket seating width bo, based upon the possible contact width of
N
the gasket.
OD Outside Diameter.
Y Gasket or joint-contact surface unit seating load, minimum design seating stress, psi.
70
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The results of their effort is a methodology which recommends the minimum levels of gasket assembly stress to fulfill the
operational requirements of the user. The new procedure is similar to the existing ASME Section VIII calculation, except it
incorporates new gasket factors (Gb), (a), (Gs) and (Tp) to replace the traditional “m” & “Y” gasket factors.
The suitability of the traditional “m” and “Y” factors, in use since the early 40's, has been questioned over the years and
although they were defined by most engineers to assume leakage behavior of pressure vessel gaskets, they had no real
bearing on leakage as we know of it today. They were basically intended by the Code authors to be used solely for the
design of flanged connections, and not supposed to be used to predict or explain leakage, nor to define assembly bolt
loads. The “m” and “Y” did however, at least provided some insight for the engineers to the relationship between assem-
bly or working stress on the gasket and a leak-free behavior.
Knowing the questionable validity of the existing gasket constants, the ASME Subcommittee on Design made a request of
the PVRC of the Welding Research Council in New York City, to investigate the revision of the traditional “m” and “Y” values.
With this task in mind, the PVRC initiated an exploratory program and has continued since it's introduction in 1974.
The traditional “m” and “Y” factors only considered the gasket material, but the PVRC findings showed very clearly that
there are other variables, including the acceptable leak rate, the contained fluid, the gasket stress achieved at assembly,
the internal pressure, and the flange surface finish. There is no question that the work done by the PVRC has provided a
better understanding of all the variables which affect the reliability of a bolted gasket joint.
(G b) and (a) represent the initial gasket compression characteristics and relate to bolt behavior, while (G s) represents
the unloading characteristics which typically are associated with operating behavior. (Tp) is also related and means
tightness parameter.
In the PVRC tests, data is obtained simultaneously on the mechanical and leak behavior of the gasket material. After
the gasket is first loaded, a partial seating stress to the gasket is made and a leak test is conducted at that point. After
loading the gasket to some maximum seating stress, the gasket would be unloaded and again, checked for a leak rate.
By the end of a given test series, the leak rate will have been checked at all of the points shown in Figure 22. In some
tests, the gasket is loaded and unloaded at several different initial stresses. After the initial unloading and reloading
cycles, the seating stress is raised, followed by further unloading and reloading tests.
Tp =
P
( L*rm a
)
Gasket Stress (Sg)
P* Lrm Dt
unload
initial
pre-load reload
71
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
reference mask leak rate (0.2 lb/hr • in, 1 mg/sec • mm) which is keyed to a normalized reference gasket
L*rm
of 5.9 in (150 mm) outside diameter.
A experimentally determined exponent (e.g., 0.5 if the contained fluid is a gas, 1.0 if it's a liquid).
A tightness parameter of 100 means that it takes a contained pressure of 100 atmospheres (1470 psi or 10.1 MPa) to create
a total leak rate of about 1 mg/sec from a gasket having a 5.9" (150mm) outer diameter. Note that the tightness parameter
is expressed in terms of mass leak rate rather than a volumetric leak rate. This allows the lumping together of test data
representing a variety of test fluids which could be gaseous or liquid. Since mass leak rates are rather difficult to visualize,
the following tables list some equivalents in terms of volumetric leak rates and some bubble equivalents for gaseous leaks.
Water 1 x 10 -3 0.008
Nitrogen 0.86 6.5
The PVRC also felt that it is necessary to define “acceptable leak rates” in terms of tightness. Three levels of tightness were
developed, called economy, standard, and tight as listed on the following page.
Tightness Classification (mg/sec•mm) (lbm/hr•in) Constant C Tightness parameter pressure ratio (Tpmin / Pr)
Economy might be used for a low-pressure water line. Standard would be the most common choice and tight might often be
required to combat fugitive emissions.
72
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Gasket Stress
Notice the three gasket factors (Gb), (a) and (Gs). Part A
These PVRC gasket constants Gb, a and Gs are based on the interpretation of leakage test data and define the leak behavior
of a gasket. (Gb) represents the loading of the gasket. The (a) represents the slope of the loading of the gasket as the gasket
stress changes. The (a) constant describes the rate at which the gasket develops tightness with increasing stress. (Gs)
represents the unloading of the gasket.
Low values of “Gb” and “a” indicate that the gasket requires low levels of gasket stress for initial seating. A low value for Gs
indicates less sensitivity to unloading or a material which can tolerate the unloading better. The test data is best summarized by
use of a dimensionless parameter called a “tightness parameter”, represented by Tp, expressed in terms of mass leak rate.
Tp is the pressure (in atmospheres) required to cause a helium leak of 1 mg/sec for a 150mm (5.9") OD gasket in a jointed
connection. A tightness parameter of 100 would mean that it takes an internal pressure of 1,470 psi (10.1 MPa) to create a
total leak rate of about 1 mg/s from a 5.9" OD (150 mm) gasket. A leak rate of 0.01 mg/s at 1,470 psi would mean a tenfold
increase in the tightness parameter to Tp = 1,000. Conversely, a tenfold decrease in the Tp will result in 100 times more leakage
from the gasket at the same stress and internal pressure. Tp is proportional to pressure and inversely proportional to the
square root of leak rate. A higher value of Tp indicates a tighter joint.
It is estimated that a new nonmandatory Appendix will appear in the revised ASME Code in the near future.
Although the three new gasket constants are intended primarily for the use of flange designers, they have been used by
people trying to analyze existing flanges or trying to decide how much torque to apply to the flange bolts. More than
likely, they will continue to be used until some other way to relate assembly preload and/or working loads on the gasket
are developed.
73
74
Table XXX Bolt Torque Requirements for GRAFOIL GHR & GHE ASME BI6.21 Gaskets
CALCULATED USING THE MAXIMUM PRESSURE RATING FOR A 316 STAINLESS
USED M AND Y FACTORS (M=2, Y=900 FOR GHR, Y=2500 FOR GHE)
STEEL FLANGE AT UP TO 100F
RECOMMENDED
CLASS 150 MINIMUM SEATING FORCE MINIMUM SEATING FORCE
GASKET LOAD
GASKET / MAX GHR GHR TORQUE REQUIRED
GHR TOTAL GHR GHE
PIPE SIZE BOLT SIZE FLANGE GASKET GASKET INTERNAL TORQUE/ GHE TOTAL TORQUE/ TO DEVELOP 5000 PSI
# BOLTS FORCE TENSION/ TENSION/
(IN) (IN) RAISED ID (IN) AREA (IN2) PRESSURE BOLT FORCE (LBS) BOLT NET GASKET TRESS
FORCE (LBS) BOLT (LBS) BOLT (LBS)
FACE OD (IN) (PSI) (FT•LBS) (FT•LBS) (FT•LBS)
0.5 0.5 4 1.38 0.84 0.941 275 1518 379 3 3024 756 6 9
0.75 0.5 4 1.69 1.06 1.360 275 2216 554 5 4393 1098 8 13
1 0.5 4 2 1.31 1.793 275 2972 743 6 5842 1461 11 17
1.25 0.5 4 2.5 1.66 2.743 275 4575 1144 9 8966 2242 16 26
1.5 0.5 4 2.88 1.91 3.647 275 6080 1520 11 11918 2980 21 34
2 0.625 4 3.62 2.38 5.840 275 9697 2424 22 19046 4762 43 68
2.5 0.625 4 4.12 2.88 6.814 275 11677 2920 26 22584 5646 50 79
3 0.625 4 5 3.5 10.009 275 17166 4292 38 33188 8298 73 117
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
*maximum torque limited by stress limit of bolting, not by stress limit of gasket material
75
Table XXX Bolt Torque Requirements for GRAFOIL GHR & GHE ASME BI6.21 Gaskets (continued)
CALCULATED USING THE MAXIMUM PRESSURE RATING FOR A 316 STAINLESS
USED M AND Y FACTORS (M=2, Y=900 FOR GHR, Y=2500 FOR GHE)
STEEL FLANGE AT UP TO 100F
RECOMMENDED
CLASS 300 MINIMUM SEATING FORCE MINIMUM SEATING FORCE
GASKET LOAD
GASKET / MAX GHR GHR TORQUE REQUIRED
GHR TOTAL GHR GHE
PIPE SIZE BOLT SIZE FLANGE GASKET GASKET INTERNAL TORQUE/ GHE TOTAL TORQUE/ TO DEVELOP 5000 PSI
# BOLTS FORCE TENSION/ TENSION/
(IN) (IN) RAISED ID (IN) AREA (IN2) PRESSURE BOLT FORCE (LBS) BOLT NET GASKET TRESS
FORCE (LBS) BOLT (LBS) BOLT (LBS)
FACE OD (IN) (PSI) (FT•LBS) (FT•LBS) (FT•LBS)
0.5 0.5 4 1.38 0.84 0.941 720 2602 651 5 4108 1028 8 9
0.75 0.625 4 1.69 1.06 1.360 720 3820 955 9 5997 1500 14 17
1 0.625 4 2 1.31 1.793 720 5168 1292 12 8038 2010 18 22
1.25 0.625 4 2.5 1.66 2.743 720 7980 1995 18 12372 3093 28 34
1.5 0.75 4 2.88 1.91 3.647 720 10603 2651 31 16441 4111 46 56
2 0.625 8 3.62 2.38 5.840 720 16877 2110 19 26226 3279 30 36
2.5 0.75 8 4.12 2.88 6.814 720 20643 2581 30 31550 3944 44 54
3 0.75 8 5 3.5 10.009 720 30360 3795 42 46382 5798 64 79
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
A gasket will normally provide a reliable seal if recommended installation procedures are followed. However, in most cases,
the performance of any gasket is not entirely dependent on the gasket, but on a combination of variables which are outside
the normal control of the gasket material manufacturer. Any leakage in a gasketed joint is not necessarily an indication of a
faulty gasket, but rather, a faulty joint. A faulty joint could be the result of improper joint assembly or bolting procedures,
damaged flanges, gasket failure, or a combination of many variables that comprise the bolted joint assembly.
To ensure that the optimum quality of a seal is achieved, there are certain assembly procedures that should be employed.
The following procedure should be employed each and every time a gasket is installed.
76
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
5. Install nuts hand tight, making sure that all nut threads WARNING:
are engaged. You are now ready to generate the required Nuts must be tightened in the sequence and incremental
bolting stresses on the joint. steps indicated. If this is not done, the flanges may become
cocked relative to each other, resulting in joint leakage. This
6. Tighten the joint.
is particularly true the smaller the flange bolt circle and the
• In order to achieve and maintain a leak tight seal on a fewer the number of bolts. By following the above sequence,
bolted flange connection, it is very important to provide reasonably even compression of the gasket will be achieved.
adequate bolt stress to meet both the operating and the
hydrostatic test conditions. The correct level of bolt stress • After final torque is reached, tighten the bolts in a
can be determined as detailed under the section headed rotational order in a clockwise direction followed
“ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Criteria.” One of by a round in the counterclockwise direction.
the major causes of joint leakage is from the inability to • Repeat the rotational clockwise and counterclockwise
adequately achieve the correct level of stress required for rotations after a minimum dwell time of four (4) hours.
the flanged connection. (A large percentage of embedment loss occurs during the
first few hours after initial tightening.) Because of the
• Start tightening, using a rotating cross-pattern sequence
varying frictional conditions of neighboring bolts and the
as shown in the following examples. Use a torque wrench
fluctuations in stress levels of bolts which occur as the
or other method to insure loading levels are correct.
bolts are individually tightened around the flange, the
• The first round should be 30% followed by increments final level of stress in all of the bolts around the flange
of 60%, 90%, and 100% of the final torque value. See can vary considerably. Tests have shown that the final
Table XXX for minimum and recommended torque values stress levels around the flange can vary as much as
for standard ASME class 150 & class 300 GRAFOIL gaskets. +/- 20% from the average, even under ideal conditions.
This table comprises the use of “m” and “Y” values. The • Apply the required leak test. If the joint leaks at low
recommended torque values are calculated at a 5000 psi pressure, carefully disassemble the joint and determine
gasket stress. The torque values are based on clean and the problem. If the joint shows minimal leakage at test
well lubricated bolting and nut-bearing surfaces. pressure, the joint should be retighten to two times the
Code allowable stress for the stud material (50,000 psi
for SA-193, GR-B7 studs). If the joint still leaks, consult
Process Vessel Engineering.
77
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Table XXXI Torque Values to Obtain 50,000 psi Tensile Stress for Various Size Bolts
(for SA-193, GR-B7 alloy steel bolts)
NOMINAL BOLT SIZE TORQUE (FT•LBS)
5/8" 100
3/4" 185
7/8" 285
1" 435
1 1/8" 560
1 1/4" 875
1 3/8" 1190
1 1/2" 1545
1 5/8" 2000
1 3/4" 2500
1 7/8" 3085
Sheet Gaskets GHR GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.002" SS Foil 816 0.377 0.066
Sheet Gaskets GHE GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.004" SS Tang 1400 0.450 0.01
Sheet Gaskets GHO GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.004" Tang C-276 1400 0.450 0.01
Sheet Gaskets GHL All GRAFOIL flexible graphite 970 0.384 0.05
Sheet Gaskets GHV GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.015" SS Sheet 1750 0.274 0.0123
Sheet Gaskets GHW GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.0025" E-Glass Insert 816 0.377 0.066
Sheet Gaskets GHP GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.0005" Polyester 970 0.384 0.05
Sheet Gaskets GHT GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.002" C-276 Foil 816 0.377 0.066
Sheet Gaskets GRAFKOTE GRAFOIL flexible graphite & 0.0005" Polyester facing 970 0.384 0.05
Spiral Wound Stainless Steel GRAFOIL flexible graphite Filler 2300 0.237 13
Corrugated Metal Jacket Corrugated Metal with Metal Jacket 8500 0.134 230
Note: All of the data presented in this table is based on the most current available published information. Values are subject to further review or
alteration since the PVRC continues to refine its data reduction techniques.
78
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
It is generally understood that it is the users responsibility to follow prescribed ASME Code calculations, and to ensure that
a sufficient amount of pre-load is applied to withstand the internal pressure, properly seat the gasket, and compensate for
any bolt relaxation.
Table XXXIII reflects the results of many tests to determine the relation between bolt torque and bolt stress. These values
are based on steel bolting being well lubricated with a mixture of oil and graphite.
79
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
260° C max
BRASS Commercial copper/ zinc alloy. Approx 60 General corrosion resistance.
(500° F)
315° C max
COPPER Commercially pure copper. Approx 80 General corrosion resistance.
(600° F)
80
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
Working pressures for material group number 1.1, carbon steel are listed first, then material class number 2.3, types
304L/316L stainless steels. This table was excerpted from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American
National Standards Institute Inc. (ANSI) B16.5 - 1996 standard.
Since the early 1970's, a major research program aimed at solving the problem of leakage of gasketed flanged joints has
been undertaken by the Pressure Vessel Research Council (PVRC). The program had the following goals:
• better understand the sealing mechanism.
• develop more meaningful gasket design factors.
• develop a standard leakage test procedure at room temperature.
• develop a design procedure to minimize leakage of gasketed flanged joints.
81
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The following acronyms represent an update of the recent tests in the area of gasket testing, specifically on the testing of
flexible graphite, elastomeric sheet gaskets and fugitive emissions gasket characteristics.
This hot tightness test serves gasket users and producers for product
Aged Hot Operational qualification. AHOT/HOTT tests evaluates the sealing performance of
AHOT
Tightness test gasketing products exposed to simulated long term service conditions
(exposure periods of several days to weeks or months).
Measures the weight loss of a gasket, creep relaxation, leakage, and adhesion
Aged Relaxation Leakage
ARLA to the flange surfaces under thermal exposure in an air oven. Similar to the
Adhesion test
ATRS test, but uses ring gaskets so leakage can be measured.
Aged Tensile Relaxation Dumbbell-shaped test specimens are tested for creep during and tensile
ATRS
Screen test strength after up to 42 days of exposure to 750°F (400°C).
Emission Hot Operational A room-temperature leakage test followed by a 3-day HOTT test, followed by
EHOT
Tightness Test an elevated-temperature leakage test.
Specimen subjected to 1200°F (649°C) for 30 min, then tested for tensile
FIRS FIRe Simulation screening test
strength and relaxation properties.
Gasket subjected to 1200°F (649°C) for 15 min. The leak rate is measured
FITT simulated FIre Tightness Test
during and after the test.
Same as the HOTT/AHOT test and then gauges for blow-out resistance under
HBOT Hot Blow-Out Test
extreme relaxation conditions.
Gasket tested for leak tightness and blowout resistance under contained
HOTT Hot Operational Tightness Test
pressure, gasket stress, and temperatures (up to 800°F) (450°C).
ROom Temperature Determines gasketing product constants (Gb, “a”, and Gs) for their use in the
ROTT
Tightness test proposed ASME Code Bolted Joint Revised Rules
The goal of the PVRC is to develop the technology for standardized performance testing methods and criteria. It is hoped that
these developments will lead to the adoption of standard performance tests by national standard bodies, such as the ASTM.
NeoGraf Solutions financially supports, and is actively involved with the research efforts of the ASME's Pressure Vessel
Research Council (PVRC) to update the current gasket design methodology. The PVRC has conceived a new philosophy that
addresses the mechanisms of sealing that will benefit gasket manufacturers, vessel designers and the operators of
pressure vessels. This has taken many years of research and development involving hundreds of actual gasket tests. The
new design factors are anticipated to appear in upcoming revisions of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
82
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS: Any fluid solution containing water. (See further discussion under pH.)
ASH: Residual product following oxidation of the base carbon as determined by prescribed methods.
BEATER ADD A manufacturing process for making nonmetallic sheet employing a paper-making process,
(BEATER SATURATED): using Fourdrinier or cylinder-type paper machines.
CALENDER: A machine equipped with two or more rolls, which is used for forming sheet gasket materials.
An element, atomic number 6, symbol C, molecular weight 12.01115, which exists in several
CARBON:
allotropic forms.
The continued deformation without additional stress, usually a natural property of the
COLD FLOW:
material. Also see CREEP.
A gasketing material primarily containing fibers, rubber, and fillers manufactured on a special
COMPRESSED SHEET: calender, known as a “sheeter” in such a manner that the compound is “built up” under high
load, on one roll of the “sheeter”, to a specified thickness.
The quality or state of being compressible. In the case of gasketing, deformation of thickness
COMPRESSIBILITY:
when subjected to a compressive stress for a period of\ time at a prescribed temperature.
The deformation that remains in gasketing after it has been subjected to, and released from, a
COMPRESSION SET:
specific compressive stress for a period of time at a prescribed temperature.
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: A property of solid material that indicates its ability to withstand a uniaxial compressive load.
CREEP: A transient stress-strain condition in which the strain increases as the stress remains constant.
83
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
A transient stress-strain condition in which the strain increases concurrently with the
CREEP RELAXATION:
decay of stress.
DENSITY: The ratio of mass of a body to its volume or mass per unit volume.
Abbreviation for Deutsche Industrie Norman. English translation is German Industry Standard.
DIN:
Is one of the European equivalents to ASTM.
The extent to which a body may be deformed and yet return to its initial shape after removal
ELASTIC UNIT:
of the deforming force.
Any of various elastic substances resembling rubber. These man-made rubbers (also called
ELASTOMER:
polymers) are produced by the combination of monomers. See also RUBBER.
FATIGUE: The weakening or deterioration of a material caused by cyclic or continuous application of stress.
FLANGE: The rigid members of a gasketed joint that contact the sides or edges of the gasket.
FLEX LIFE: The number of cyclic bending stresses a material can withstand before failure.
FLEXURAL STRENGTH: A property of solid material that indicates its ability to withstand a flexural or bending load.
FULL-FACE GASKET: A gasket covering the entire flange surface extending beyond the bolt holes.
A deformable material, which when clamped between essentially stationary faces, prevents
GASKET:
the passage of matter through an opening or joint.
GASKETING: Material in any form from which gaskets may be cut, formed, or fabricated.
GASKETING SHEET: Refers to a specific flat form of gasketing material from which gaskets are cut and/or fabricated.
The collective total of all members used to effect a gasketed seal between two separate
GASKETED JOINT:
pipes or vessels. Includes the bolts, flanges & gaskets used together to form the joint.
The designation given a material by a manufacturer such that it is always reproduced to the
GRADE:
same specifications established by the manufacturer.
IMPREGNATION: Partial filling of the open pore structure with another material.
84
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
LEAK: The passage of matter through interfacial openings or passageways, or both, in the gasket.
The quantity, either mass or volume, of fluid passing through and/or over the faces of gaskets
LEAKAGE RATE:
in a given length of time.
The factor that provides the additional pre-load capability in the flange fasteners to
MAINTENANCE “M” FACTOR:
maintain sealing pressure on a gasket after the internal pressure is applied to the joint.
A bonded granular carbon body whose matrix has been subjected to a temperature typically
MANUFACTURED CARBON:
between 900 and 2400°C.
A bonded granular carbon body whose matrix has been subjected to a temperature typically
MANUFACTURED GRAPHITE:
in excess of 2400°C and whose matrix is thermally stable below that temperature.
MSS: Abbreviation for Manufacturers Standardization Society of the valve and fittings industry.
PERMANENT SET: The amount by which an elastic material fails to return to its initial form after deformation.
PLASTICIZER: A compounding ingredient which can change the hardness, flexibility, or plasticity of an elastomer.
POROSITY: The percentage of the total volume of a material occupied by both open and closed pores.
A method of vulcanizing rubber by use of heated platens, which can be brought together and
PRESS CURE: separated by hydraulic pressure or mechanical action, between which sheet can be cured
under pressure.
A numerical value resulting from the multiplication of the internal pressure (psi) by the
PT VALUE:
temperature of the fluid being sealed. Used only as a rough safety guide for limited gasket usage.
85
G R A F O I L® E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N M A N U A L
The measure of fluid leakage through and/or across both faces of a gasket. Measured either
SEALABILITY:
by using ASTM F-37, ROTT, or DIN 3535 standard test procedures.
SPRINGBACK: Expressed as a percent, the distance a gasket recovers from an initial compressive load.
STRAIN: The deformation of a gasket specimen under the action of applied force or stress.
A transient stress-strain condition in which the stress decays as the strain remains constant.
(This condition is encountered in grooved-face gasketing joints in which metal-to-metal
STRESS-RELAXATION:
contact occurs. This condition is also approached in flat-face gasketing joints when the bolt
is practically infinitely rigid.)
The relationship of load and deformation in a gasket under stress. In most nonmetallic
STRESS-STRAIN:
gasketing, this is commonly the relationship of compressive load and compression (strain).
TENSILE STRENGTH: A property of solid material that indicates its ability to withstand a uniaxial tensile load (pulling).
That temperature at which one square meter of 70 lbs/ft 3 (1.12 mg/m3) density, 15 mil (.38
THRESHOLD OF OXIDATION:
mm) thick GRAFOIL will lose 1% of its weight in 24 hours.
WORKING PRESSURE: The maximum operating pressure encountered during normal service.
The minimum design seating stress on the gasket in either psi or megapascals that is
YIELD “Y” FACTOR:
required to provide a sealed joint with no internal pressure in the joint.
86