A Frequency-Reconfigurable Series-Fed Microstrip Patch Array With Interconnecting CRLH Transmission Lines
A Frequency-Reconfigurable Series-Fed Microstrip Patch Array With Interconnecting CRLH Transmission Lines
A Frequency-Reconfigurable Series-Fed Microstrip Patch Array With Interconnecting CRLH Transmission Lines
15, 2016
I. INTRODUCTION
from a single point and the radiating elements are connected
in series by using conventional transmission lines of suitable
R APID growth in the areas of WiMAX, WiFi, GPS,
Bluetooth, and UWB [1] has led to the development
of multiband platforms capable of accessing these wireless
length for the operating frequency. These transmission lines
can be replaced by meandered lines and drive the elements
of the array with the same voltage phase in order to achieve
services. A major benefit of a reconfigurable antenna is the
a broadside radiation pattern. However, at low microwave
capability to access multiple services in a device without the
frequencies, meander lines can be very large. A possible way
need of multiple antennas, thus potentially saving space. In
to overcome this size problem is to incorporate composite
many of the reconfigurable antenna designs in published litera-
right/left-handed transmission lines (CRLH-TLs) into the feed
ture, p-i-n diodes, RF microelectromechanical system (MEMS)
network of a series-fed antenna array [8]–[13]. Efforts have
switches, and optical switches have been used to reconfigure
been made previously to minimize the overall size of an array
the antennas [2]–[6]. Furthermore, microstrip patch antenna
using CRLH-TLs [14]–[16]. However, these designs were
arrays are of great interest because of their small size, low
limited to a single band of operation, and broadside radiation at
cost, light weight, ease of manufacturing, and useful radiation
two different frequencies may be difficult.
patterns [7]. Typically, series-fed antenna arrays are driven
In this letter, the benefits of metamaterial-based transmission
lines are combined with frequency reconfigurability to develop
a compact series-fed microstrip patch array. The layout of the
Manuscript received April 02, 2015; accepted May 24, 2015. Date of publi-
cation June 01, 2015; date of current version February 12, 2016. proposed array is shown in Fig. 1. It consists of three radiating
M. S. Khan is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, patches and two nonradiating CRLH-TL interconnections be-
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102 USA, and also with the De- tween the radiating elements. The p-i-n diodes activate one of
partment of Information Engineering, Padova University, 35131 Padova, Italy.
A.-D. Capobianco is with the Department of Information Engineering, the CRLH-TLs at a time along with the particular sections of
Padova University, 35131 Padova, Italy. the main microstrip patch. These electrical switches reroute the
A. Iftikhar and S. Asif are with the Department of Electrical and Computer current in a specific direction and alter the electrical lengths in
Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102 USA, and also
with the Department of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS IIT, Islamabad the overall array, hence controlling the operating frequency of
44000, Pakistan. the array and achieving broadside radiation at two frequencies.
B. Ijaz is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS IIT, Is- Furthermore, this work is related to the single-frequency design
lamabad 44000, Pakistan.
B. D. Braaten is with the Department of Electrical and Computer En- reported in [16].
gineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102 USA (e-mail:
[email protected]). A. Design of the Array
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this letter are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. The equivalent impedance model of a series-fed antenna
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LAWP.2015.2439637 array is shown in Fig. 2(a), which is classified as a standing
1536-1225 © 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
KHAN et al.: FREQUENCY-RECONFIGURABLE SERIES-FED MICROSTRIP PATCH ARRAY WITH INTERCONNECTING CRLH TRANSMISSION LINES 243
Fig. 3. (a) Layout of CRLH-TL unit cell 1. (b) Layout of CRLH-TL unit
Fig. 2. (a) Circuit representation of a 3-element series-fed array with conven- cell 2. (c) Circuit representation of CRLH-TL unit cells. Dimensions are:
tional microstrip interconnects and (b) circuit representation of a 3-element mm, mm, mm, mm, mm,
series-fed array with CRLH-TL interconnections showing the switching mm.
mechanism.
Fig. 5. (a) Photograph of the manufactured prototype. (b) Diode “ON” model
and (c) diode “OFF” model.
Fig. 7. Simulated and measured for the upper band with activated.
Fig. 6. Simulated and measured for the lower band with activated.
Fig. 8. Surface current distribution for (a) 1.97 and (b) 2.37 GHz.
and is shown in Fig. 5(a). The CRLH-TL unit cells were con-
nected to the array elements with switches consisting of sur-
face-mount voltage-controlled p-i-n diodes. The control voltage B. Surface Current
( V) was applied to the conducting surface with RF The simulated surface current distribution at both operating
chokes. The p-i-n diodes chosen were manufactured by Sky- frequencies is shown in Fig. 8. When the array is operating at
works [19] (part number: SMP 1322), and to isolate the se- the lower band, the current travels through the small patches
ries-fed antenna array from the dc power source supplying the to the CRLH-TL unit cell 2. There is a small induced current
bias voltage, the RF chokes manufactured by Mini-circuits (part on CRLH-TL unit cell 1 as well, but it does not contribute to
number: ADCH-80A) [20] were used. the lower resonant band due to its weak intensity. Similarly,
The p-i-n diodes were modeled using the equivalent circuit when the array is operating at the upper band, the current flows
defined in the data sheet, and the lumped elements were used through CRLH-TL unit cell 1 and there is much less current
in HFSS in a manner to the methods reported in [11] and induced on the small patches and CRLH-TL unit cell 2.
[12]. For the ON state, the diodes were modeled using the
equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 5(b), and for the OFF state, the C. Radiation Patterns, Gain, and Efficiency
diodes were modeled using the circuit in Fig. 5(c). Figs. 6 and Next, the normalized radiation pattern of the array was mea-
7 show the comparison of the -parameters of the array with sured in both the lower and upper reconfigurable bands. In par-
measurements. When switch was activated by biasing the ticular, the component in the -plane was measured at 1.97
lower diodes series and unbiasing the upper diode series, the and 2.37 GHz. The results from the measurements are shown in
antenna had a smaller electrical length and the current was the Fig. 9, and a broadside radiation has been demonstrated at
passing through the CRLH-TL unit cell 1, hence resonating both switching frequencies.
at the higher resonant frequency of 2.37 GHz (as shown in Next, the gain of the proposed reconfigurable antenna array
Fig. 7). When was turned “OFF” (i.e., when the lower diodes was measured in a fully calibrated anechoic chamber and com-
were unbiased) and was turned “ON” (i.e., upper diodes pared to the simulated gain values from HFSS. When the array
were biased), then a longer current path through the CRLH-TL was configured for the lower band, the measured gain at the
unit cell 2 was introduced. This then resulted in the lower 1.97 GHz (resonant frequency) was 1.9 dBi while the simulated
reconfigurable frequency of 1.97 GHz (as shown in Fig. 6). A gain was 2.45 dBi. Also, while still configured for 1.97 GHz,
fair comparison between simulated and measured results can the gain at 2.37 GHz (nonresonant frequency) was measured
be seen. Differences between the results in Figs. 6 and 7 could to be 6.0 dBi and simulated to be 5.2 dBi. This illustrated
be due to: 1) the placement of the diodes during manufacturing; that the radiation from the antenna is in the desired lower re-
2) the machine milling of the CRLH sections; 3) the nonideal configurable band. Similarly, when the array was reconfigured
RF chokes; and 4) the additional losses in the diodes (which is for the upper operating band, the measured gain at 1.97 GHz
shown by the lower measured curves). (nonresonant frequency) was 5.5 dBi and the simulated gain
KHAN et al.: FREQUENCY-RECONFIGURABLE SERIES-FED MICROSTRIP PATCH ARRAY WITH INTERCONNECTING CRLH TRANSMISSION LINES 245
REFERENCES
[1] S. Yang, C. Zhang, H. K. Pan, A. E. Fathy, and V. K. Nair, “Frequency
reconfigurable antenna for multiradio wireless platforms,” IEEE Mi-
crow. Mag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 66–83, Feb. 2009.
[2] C. W. Jung, M. Lee, G. P. Li, and F. De Flaviis, “Reconfigurable scan-
beam single-arm spiral antenna integrated with RF-MEMS switches,”
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 455–463, Feb. 2006.
[3] D. E. Anagnostou et al., “Design, fabircation, and measurements of
an RF-MEMS-based self-similar reconfigurable antenna,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 422–432, Feb. 2006.
[4] S. Shelley, J. Costantine, C. G. Christodoulou, D. E. Anagnostou, and
J. C. Lyke, “FPGA-controlled switch-reconfigured antenna,” IEEE An-
tennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 355–358, 2010.
[5] C. J. Panagamuwa, A. Chauraya, and J. C. Vardaxoglou, “Frequency
and beam reconfigurable antenna using photoconductive switches,”
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 449–454, Feb. 2006.
[6] Y. Tawk, A. R. Albrecht, S. Hemmady, G. Balakrishnan, and C. G.
Christodoulou, “Optically pumped frequency reconfigurable antenna
design,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 280–283,
2010.
[7] M. M. Alam, M. M. R. Sonchoy, and M. O. Goni, “Design and perfor-
mance analysis of microstrip array antenna,” in Proc. Prog. Electro-
magn. Res. Symp., Moscow, Russia, Aug. 18–21, 2009, pp. 1837–1842.
[8] A. Lai, T. Itoh, and C. Caloz, “Composite right/left-handed transmis-
sion line metamaterials,” IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 34–50,
Sep. 2004.
[9] T. Jang et al., “Switchable composite right/left handed (S-CRLH)
transmission line using MEMS switches,” IEEE Microw. Wireless
Compon. Lett., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 804–806, Dec. 2009.
Fig. 9. Simulated and measured radiation pattern in the -plane for (a) 1.97 [10] G. Monti, R. De Paolis, and L. Tarricone, “Design of a 3-state recon-
and (b) 2.37 GHz. figurable CRLH transmission line based on MEMS switches,” Prog.
Electromgn. Res., vol. 95, pp. 283–297, 2009.
[11] B. D. Braaten et al., “A cascaded reconfigurable RH/CRLH-zero-phase
microstrip transmission line unit cell,” in Proc. IEEE ICWITS, Maui,
was 4.75 dBi. Then, the measured gain at 2.37 GHz (resonant HI, USA, Nov. 11–16, 2012, pp. 1–4.
frequency) was 3.5 dBi and the simulated gain was 3.95 dBi. [12] M.-I. Lai, T.-Y. Wu, J.-C. Hsieh, C.-H. Wang, and S.-K. Jeng, “Design
of reconfigurable antennas based on an L-shaped slot and PIN diodes
Finally, the efficiencies of the proposed series-fed array were for compact wireless devices,” Microw., Antennas Propag., vol. 3, no.
simulated in HFSS. The efficiency at 2.37 GHz was determined 1, pp. 47–54, 2009.
to be 0.785, and at 1.97 GHz, it was reduced to 0.47. This was [13] M. Hashemi, N. Yuan, and T. Itoh, “Dual-band composite rigth left-
handed matematerial concept,” IEEE Microw. Wireless compon. Lett.,
due to the diodes used in switching at the lower band. Thus, one vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 248–250, May 2008.
drawback of using RF p-i-n diodes on an antenna array is a re- [14] Z. Zhang and S. Xu, “A novel parellel-series feeding network of mi-
duction in efficiency. However, the array shows reasonable gain crostip patch arrays with composite right/left-handed transmission line
for millimeter wave applications,” Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves, vol.
at both operating frequencies in the broadside direction, and effi- 26, no. 9, pp. 1329–1341, Sep. 2005.
ciency can be improved using better diodes or MEMs switches. [15] M. A. Antoniades and G. V. Eleftheriades, “A metamaterial series-fed
linear dipole array with reduced beam squinting,” in Proc. IEEE Int.
Symp. Antennas Propag., Albuquerque, NM, USA, Jul. 2006, pp.
4125–4128.
III. CONCLUSION [16] B. Ijaz et al., “A series-fed microstrip patch array with interconnecting
crlh transmission lines for WLAN applications,” in Proc. 7th EuCAP,
Gothenburg, Sweden, Apr. 12–18, 2013, pp. 2088–2091.
In this letter, a new frequency-reconfigurable series-fed array [17] T. Yuan, N. Yuan, and L. Li, “A novel series-fed taper antenna array
based on zero-phase composite right/left-handed transmission design,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 362–365,
2008.
lines (CRLH-TLs) was presented. Also, by the use of p-i-n [18] W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, 2nd
diodes, the CRLH-TLs were activated and the current path ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1998.
was provided for the three interconnected microstrip patches. [19] Skyworks, Inc., “Skyworks, Inc.,” [Online]. Available: http://www.
skyworksinc.com
Simulated and measured results of the -parameters and gain at [20] Mini-Circuits, “Mini-Circuits,” [Online]. Available: http://www.mini-
both operating frequencies showed fair agreement. It was also circuits.com