Memorandums: Name Clause
Memorandums: Name Clause
Memorandums: Name Clause
Name Clause:
The name of the company must be mentioned in the memorandum. It is the symbol of the
company’s existence. There are some rules regarding the selection of a name for the company
—
1. Undesirable names cannot be used which includes—
Resembling names that are calculated to deceive cannot be allowed. (Ewing vs. Buttercup
Margarine Co. Ltd. – 1917) But if the name though resembling, is not calculated to deceive
can be allowed. (Society of Motor Manufacturers vs. Motor Manufacturers & Trader’ Mutual
Insurance Co. Ltd – 1917)
Misleading and confusing names cannot be selected
Some names are prohibited by statute like, Red Cross, UN, Boy Scout, etc.
2. The term “Limited” must be used at the end of the name. [Section 6 (a)] Otherwise the
director will personally be liable, not the Company. (Basudeo Lal vs. Madan Lal – 1967). But
if the omission of Ltd is not intentional but accidental, the company will be liable, not the
directors)
Object Clause:
In the third clause the memo must state the objects for which the proposed company is to be
established. The clause indicates the object of the company as well as draw limitations on the
powers of the Company.
Choice of object lies with the subscribers to the memo and their freedom in this respect is
unlimited. The obvious restrictions include that object must not contradict any law of the land
or any provision of Companies Act 1994. For example, not company can be established for
the purpose of gambling.
Then Richie brought an action for damages for breach of contract. He contended that the
contract in question comes within the meaning of General Contractors, and therefore was
within the powers of the Company. He also contended that the contract was ratified by
majority of shareholders.But the court held that the contract was ultra vires and, therefore,
null and void. The Judge stated that, the term general Contractors must be taken to indicate
the making generally of such contracts as are connected with the business of the mechanical
engineers, otherwise it would authorize the contracts of any and every description, even fire
& marine insurance. Regarding ratification by the shareholders, the court said that a thing
cannot be ratified which is outside the powers of the company. Even all the shareholders
cannot attempt to do something, which by law, they are prohibited to do.The principle was
recognized in later cases and it became a famous principle of Company law. But in Attorney
General vs. Great Eastern Rly Co. 1880, House of Lords reduced the rigidity of the principle
and observed that, this doctrine should be reasonably applied. Whatever may be fairly
incidental to the objects authorized ought not to be held as ultra vires, unless it is expressly
prohibited.
Thus a company may do an act which is—
necessary for; or incidental to the attainment of its main object, or
Otherwise authorized by the Act.
Case Law:
Forest vs. Manchester Rly Co. 1861
A railway company having authority to keep steam vessels for the purpose of a ferry, may
use them for excursion trips to the sea when they were unemployed.
Evans vs. Burner, Mond & Co. -1921
A chemical manufacturer was allowed to distribute 100000 pound to universities and
scientific institutions for the furtherance of scientific education and research as it was
conducive to the continued progress of the Company as Chemical manufacturers.
Liability Clause:
The fourth clause has to state the nature of liability that the members incur. If the company is
to be incorporated with limited liability, the clause must state the liability of the members
shall be limited by share.
Capital Clause:
The next clause states the amount of the nominal capital of the company and the member and
value of the shares into which it is to be divided. There is no hard and fast rule regarding the
maximum or minimum amount of the capital. It depends on the nature of the business.
Association Clause:
The memorandum concludes with the subscribers’ declaration. The subscribers thus consent
to buy shares as set opposite to their names and form a company according to the
memorandum. The rules are—
1: Each subscriber must take at least one share [Section 6(b)]
2: Each subscriber must state the number of shares they are taking opposite to their names
[Section 6(c)]
3: Each subscriber must sign the document before two witnesses and get attested. [Section
9(c)]
Alteration of Memorandum
1. Alteration of Name:
According to section 11 of the Companies Act the procedure for alteration of name–
1: Special resolution
2: Written permission from High Court
Application to the Registrar with copies of resolution & court permission.
2. Alteration of Registered Office:
Ordinary Resolution
Notice to the Registrar
3. Alteration of Object:
According to section 12 (1) of the Companies Act 1994 a company can alter its object subject
to certain limitations which are –
a: To enable the company to carry on its business more economically or more efficiently
(Scientific Poultry Breeders Association, Re. -1933).
b: To enable the company to attain its main purpose by new or improved means
To enlarge or change the local area of the Company’s operation
c: To carry on some business which under existing circumstances or advantageously be
combined with the business of the company. (Cyclists’ Touring Club, Re – 1907)
d: To restrict or abandon any of the objects specified in the memorandum.
e: To sell or dispose of the whole or any part of the undertaking of the company.
f: To amalgamate with any other company or body of persons.
After considering all the limitations, the Company can alter its object clause according to the
following procedure—
a:Special resolution
b:Confirmation from High Court
c:Debenture-holders and creditors must be notified and it shall be ensured that they have no
objection
d: Court can allow total or partial alteration
4. Alteration of Capital:
Capital of a company may be altered with two different effects—
Increase of capital: According to section 53, capital may be increased by an ordinary
resolution passed in a General meeting