WaterSA 1998 02 Apr98 p147
WaterSA 1998 02 Apr98 p147
WaterSA 1998 02 Apr98 p147
Abstract
A mesophylic laboratory-scale upflow anaerobic sludge bed bioreactor design was evaluated for the treatment of a carbohydrate-
rich effluent from the canning industry. The bioreactor was inoculated with 500 g of anaerobic granules and after the system
had stabilised the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was set at 24 h and the substrate pH poised at 8.0 to prevent the effect of
rapid acidification. In the first experimental study the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was increased stepwise from 2 300
to a full strength of 4 000 mg·l-1. In the second study the organic loading rate was increased by shortening the HRT (24 to 8 h) to
give an organic loading rate increase from 3.95 to 10.95 kgCOD·m-3·d-1 with an average COD removal of 90 to 93% and
removal rate of 9.8 kgCOD·m-3·d-1. However, the recovery rate of the system at HTR values below 10 h was found to be very
slow suggesting that the system had reached its minimum HRT. This was confirmed by the stabilisation of the granule bed. An
HRT of 10 h was thus taken as the optimum operational HRT. Since neutralisation costs would influence economic aspects of
the process, the influence of lower pH values was investigated in the third study where the pH of the canning effluent was
lowered from 8.0 to 5.0. At the lower pH the COD removal dropped drastically, the biogas production decreased and the
digester effluent pH dropped to 6.2. It was clear from the slow recovery of the digester and the low COD removal (66.1%) that
the lower end of the operational pH had been reached and any further lowering of the substrate pH would lead to system failure.
The economic implication of being able to operate at pH 5.5 means that fresh canning effluent can be introduced into the
digester without any neutralisation, is considerable.
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. A laboratory-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket bioreactor
( (021) 808-3509; fax (021) 808-3510; e-mail [email protected] (UASB) was used. The digester had an operational volume of
Received 6 August 1997; accepted in revised form 5 January 1998 2.3 l (total height of 830 mm and internal dia. of 50 mm) and
Analytical methods
Canning effluent composition The substrates used during these experimental studies were a
dilution of the factory effluent given in Table 1. To prevent a
The average composition of 15 different batches from a local shortage of nitrogen and phosphorus, a 100 mg·l-1 of each of
fruit-canning factory is given in Table 1. The data clearly show ureum and K2HPO4 and 1.0 ml·l-1 of the trace element solution
that the composition of the effluent was fairly constant over the were added and the COD diluted to the required concentration.
whole canning season. During the study period only the COD of The pH was poised at 8.0 using a 1.0 N Ca(OH)2 solution as
this effluent was standardised. initially at the start of the study the digester showed signs of pH
instability with a tendency towards pH values below 6.5 units. A
summary of the operational conditions and digester efficiency is
TABLE 1 given in Table 2. The hydraulic retention time was kept constant
AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF THE FRUIT CANNING at 24 h and the OLR increased in 7 steps from 2.28 to 3.95
FACTORY EFFLUENT USED AS SUBSTRATE FOR kgCOD·m-3·d-1. The final value represented on average the full
THE UASB BIOREACTOR (mg·l-1) strength effluent as obtained from the factory and from these data
it was concluded that it could be treated directly without dilution.
Parameter Average SD
Study II - Shortening the hydraulic retention time
pH 5.45* 1.4
COD 4432* 297 During this study the HRT was shortened from 24 h to 8 h over
TS 2114* 625 14 steps (Table 3) with a subsequent increase in OLR from 3.95
TVS 1783* 169 to 10.95 kgCOD·m-3·d-1. Stable-state conditions plus 5 HRTs
TNVS 331* 152 were used as criterion for increasing the OLR. During the
PO4 5.32* 3.9 different steps the pH of the digester effluent remained fairly
TKN 21.4* 12.4 constant (7.5 to 8.1) with the alkalinity in the range of 1 800 to
Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 25* 6.5 3 200 at the end of each step. However, directly on changing the
Glucose 161.6+ 25.3 OLR it was usually found that the pH dropped from 0.2 to 0.8 units
Fructose 389.7+ 34.6 but within 5 d the pH increased and stabilised. The pH stability
Sorbitol 88.8+ 9.7 can probably be ascribed to the high alkalinity level (1 800 to
Ca2+ 21+ nd 3 200 mg·l-1). According to Duff and Kennedy (1982) and Lane
Co2+ <0.06+ nd (1984), alkalinity plays an important role in minimising over-
Fe (total) 7.9+ nd loading effects.
K 84+ nd During this study it was found that at HRT values of shorter
Mg 15+ nd than 10 h, the recovery rate in terms of pH and COD removal
Na 65+ nd stabilisation was slower than found with the longer HRTs with up
Ni2+ <0.3+ nd to 14 h before the two parameters stabilised. The decrease in pH
SO42- 12.8+ nd after increasing the OLR, as one of the indicators of impending
S2- 0.03+ nd digester failure, has been intensively studied (Hill and Bolte,
1989). According to Dohanyos et al. (1985), any change in
* = Data are means of 15 batches operational parameters, such as organic loading, causes simulta-
+
= Average of two determinations neous increase in the concentration of all the volatile fatty acids
resulting in a decrease in the pH. Once the microbial biomass has
recovered and stabilised the extra VFAs are normally metabo-
lised and the pH stabilises (Myburg and Britz, 1993). Based on
the extended stabilisation time at these HRTs, it was concluded
TABLE 2
OPERATING CONDITIONS AND DIGESTER EFFICIENCY DURING EXPERIMENTAL STUDY I WHERE THE
ORGANIC LOADING RATE WAS INCREASED
Parameter Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Substrate COD (mg·l-1) 2 300 2 500 3 000 3 200 3 500 3 700 4 000
COD removal (%) 88 92 90 91 89 90 91
HRT (h) 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
OLR (kgCOD·m-3·d-1) 2.28 2.5 3.0 3.22 3.49 3.73 3.95
Digester pH 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.7 8.0
Alkalinity (mg·l-1 CaCO3) 1 800 1 850 1 950 1 125 1 225 2 010 2 125
Biogas (l·d-1) 1.1 1.37 2.36 1.84 2.27 2.35 2.52
Methane (%) 62 63 64 64 65 64 64
4 161
3 200
10.95
8.7
7.9
93
64
14
taken as the optimum operational conditions (Table 3).
8
Study III - Lowering of the substrate pH
4 099
2 700
6.68
7.9
9.8
91
64
13
9
OPERATING CONDITIONS AND DIGESTER EFFICIENCY DURING EXPERIMENTAL STUDY II WHERE THE HRT WAS SHORTENED
2 350
5.72
8.68
7.6
the third experimental study. In this study, based on the data
90
62
10
12
obtained during Study II, the HRT was kept constant at 10 h and
the substrate pH lowered in 7 steps over 60 d from 8.0 to 5.0.
4 125
2 625
6.39
8.25
The data (Table 4) show that at substrate pHs of 6.0 and 5.5,
8.1
93
64
11
11
2 450
64
12
10
Britz, 1986). When the substrate pH was lowered to 5.0 the COD
removal dropped drastically (Table 4) and the biogas production
3 967
2 600
started to decrease. It was also found that just after the change to
7.55
5.58
6.84
91
64
13
9
pH 5.0 the digester effluent pH dropped to 6.2 and once the system
reached stable state slowly increased to 6.7. It was clear from the
slow recovery of the digester and the low COD removal (66.1%)
3 953
3 800
5.33
6.27
7.7
90
63
14
8
that the lower end of the operational pH had been reached and any
further lowering of the substrate pH would lead to system failure.
The substrate pH was then reset at 5.5 which is near the average
Steps
3 912
3 200
4.5
7.5
6.2
88
62
15
2 200
4.72
6.13
7.6
94
65
16
2 250
4.7
8.1
5.6
64
17
5
1 800
4.74
65
18
4
2 100
64
20
3
2 250
64
22
2
2 125
2.52
3.95
8.0
91
63
24
1
definite increase in the bed height was found, suggesting that the
bioreactor had not reached its loading capacity. Around day 90,
once an HRT of 10 h had been reached, the bed growth stabilised
and remained stable for the rest of the study. At HRT values
Alkalinity (mg·l-1 CaCO3)
OLR (kgCOD·m-3·d-1)
might have taken place but since 4 000 mg·l-1 was the maximum
Parameter
Parameter Steps
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Substrate COD (mg·l-1) 3 937 3 980 4 096 3 834 4 018 4 104 4 352
COD removal (%) 90.7 88.5 90.5 90.2 88.3 89.4 66.1
HRT (h) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
OLR (kgCOD·m-3·d-1) 8.75 9.48 9.75 9.13 9.57 9.77 10.4
Substrate pH 8.0 7.5 7.3 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0
Digester pH 8.0 7.6 7.89 7.95 6.82 6.91 6.7
Alkalinity (mg·l-1 CaCO3) 3 475 2 550 2 775 2 175 1 150 1 150 1 050
Biogas (l·d-1) 4.88 5.72 6.45 7.7 8.75 9.43 8.12
Methane (%) 64 63 63 64 65 65 63
Conclusions
Acknowledgements