Supreme Court: Adultery Not A Crime, Women Not Property of Husbands, But Still Civil Wrong

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Supreme Court: Adultery not a crime, women not property of

husbands, but still civil wrong

The bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices R F Nariman, A M
Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra held that Section 497 is
unconstitutional.

The CJI and Justice Khanwilkar said: “We declare Section 497 IPC and Section
198 of CrPC dealing with prosecution of offences against marriage as
unconstitutional“.
The court said any provision treating women with inequality is not constitutional
and it’s time to say that husband is not the master of woman.

The CJI said section 497 of the IPC is manifestly arbitrary the way it deals with
women. The bench held that adultery can be treated as civil wrong for dissolution
of marriage.

There can’t be any social licence which destroys a home, the CJI said, but added
that adultery should not be a criminal offence.

The court said adultery can be a ground for civil wrong, a ground for divorce but
not a criminal offence. Justice Chandrachud said autonomy is intrinsic in dignified
human existence and Section 497 denudes women from making choices and held
adultery as a relic of past.

Legislature has imposed a condition on sexuality of women by making adultery as


offence, he said, adding that section 497 is denial of substance of equality. He said
Section 497 is held to be unconstitutional as adultery is manifestly arbitrary.
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/sc-declares-penal-provision-on-adultery-
unconstitutional/article25055821.ece#

You might also like