Determination of Counterfeit Drugs

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

AF # 221E

Determination of Counterfeit Drugs


Counterfeit drugs are a
substantial and growing
problem, both in the
developed and in the
developing world.

The legal definition of “counterfeit drug” varies by


country, but one useful definition of that is that of the
World Health Organization, which “defines a counterfeit
pharmaceutical product as a product that is deliberately
and fraudulently mislabeled with respect to identity
and/or source.”

Counterfeit drugs represent a two-fold danger to the


public. On the one hand, counterfeits that do not contain
the proper active ingredient in the proper quantity result
in the patient’s condition going untreated. On the other
hand, counterfeits may contain toxic materials that result
in the patient being poisoned. In both cases, the patient
has been the victim of fraud, and the confidence that the
public places in the health-care system is undermined.

Determining whether a suspect product is genuine or


counterfeit is often done with wet-chemical procedures,
such as thin-layer chromatography. Accurate and
reliable performance of these techniques requires skilled
personnel and the appropriate laboratory facilities. Figure 1. FT-IR diffuse reflectance spectra (6200-5300
Furthermore, these methods often cannot be performed cm-1) of Zantac 75 (R) (top trace), and two generic
as rapidly as would be desired. ranitidine formulations (middle and bottom trace).

Determination counterfeit FT-NIR Tablet analysis OPUS/LAB is a user MPA spectrometer with
drugs using MPA friendly software package complete accessory

FT-NIR www.brukeroptics.com
An Example
Zantac 75® is a non-prescription, brand-name
pharmaceutical, used for treatment of excess stomach
acid. The active ingredient is ranitidine hydrochloride,
which is also available in generic formulations. The
differences between the formulations make it possible
to distinguish the brand-name drug from the generic
counterparts using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Experimental
Samples of Zantac 75® and two generic ranitidine
formulations were tested. Spectra were obtained using
a Bruker MPA equipped with an integrating sphere for
sampling in diffuse reflectance. Since diffuse
reflectance is a surface-sensitive technique, and Figure 2. Factor analysis graph demonstrating the
because some of the samples had printing on one side ability of the Opus software to distinguish between the
of the tablet, spectra were obtained of both sides of all name-brand pharmaceutical and the generic product.
-1
of the tablets tested. Spectra were taken at 8 cm
resolution, 32 scans per spectrum.

Spectra of the three samples are shown in Figure 1.


Substantial differences can be observed between the
Zantac (upper trace) and the two generic formulations
(middle and bottom traces). These can be used with a
conformity test to provide a yes/no identification of the
suspect product.

Automation and User Interface


The user interface to the spectroscopic system can be
simplified with the use of OpusLab, providing a system
usable by non-technical personnel that provides
unambiguous results.

Conclusion
Verification of the identity of a pharmaceutical product
has been demonstrated using a Bruker Optics FT-NIR
spectrometer. The speed and precision of this
analytical system can aid health authorities in their fight
to protect the public from the increasing trade in
counterfeit pharmaceuticals.

For more information contact us:

Bruker Optics Inc Bruker Optik GmbH Bruker Optics Asia Pacific Ltd.
+ 1 978 439-9899 + 49 7243 504-600 + 852 2796-6100
www.brukeroptics.com www.brukeroptics.de [email protected]

FT-NIR [email protected] [email protected]

You might also like