Metallurgical Characterization of A Weld Bead Coating Applied by The PTA Process On The D2 Tool Steel
Metallurgical Characterization of A Weld Bead Coating Applied by The PTA Process On The D2 Tool Steel
Metallurgical Characterization of A Weld Bead Coating Applied by The PTA Process On The D2 Tool Steel
Abstract: In this investigation, a nickel-base powder mixed with tungsten carbide particles
Received: 26 Jan., 2016
Accepted: 10 June, 2016 was applied by Plasma Transferred Arc welding (PTA) on the surface of the D2 cold work tool
steel to improve surface quality and to extend its lifetime during applications. The Design of
E-mail: [email protected] (AT) Experiment (DoE) method was applied to obtain the appropriate combination of hardfacing
parameters and to run the minimum number of tests. Current, travel speed and preheat were
considered as variable parameters. These parameters are important to reach a final layer with
an appropriate bead geometry accompanied with good metallurgical properties. All samples
were prepared for metallurgical investigations and the effect of process parameters on the weld
bead geometry was considered. For each experiment run, weld bead geometry parameters
were measured including dilution, penetration and reinforcement. Microstructures and the
distribution of tungsten carbide particles after welding were analyzed by Optical Microscopy
(OM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) equipped with an EDS microprobe. In addition,
hardness tests were performed to evaluate the mechanical properties of the weld bead
layers. Finally, among all the experiments, the best sample with appropriate bead geometry
and microstructure was selected.
Key-words: Design of Experiment (DoE); Hardfacing; Nickel-base powder; PTA process; Tool
steel.
1. Introduction
The surface hardening processes can improve tribological, wear and corrosion
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of properties of industrial components working in harsh situations [1-3]. Among different
the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License
which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, welding processes, Plasma Transferred Arc (PTA) is a relatively new method compared to
and reproduction in any medium provided the original work
is properly cited. other conventional welding processes such as GTAW and GMAW [3]. In the PTA method,
Tahaei et al.
the filler material in the form of powders is carried from the powder holder to the weld pool [4]. By means of
this method, layers with different thicknesses and a strong metallurgical bond to the substrate can be produced.
In addition, it has high productivity and ability to automation for weld overlay applications [1,5]. In addition, in the
PTA method, the value of dilution can be kept at a minimum, and by adjusting the feeding rate a sound weld bead
is achievable [3,6]. The impact of the PTA process parameters on the microstructure and properties of the weld bead
has been investigated by many researchers [7-9]. Boulithis et al. [7] studied the effect of PTA surface treatments on
tool steel before and after applying heat treatment. Nouri et al. [10] worked on the effect of the welding parameters
on the properties of the hardface layer.
Chatterjee and Pal [11] worked on the deposition of various layers, considering the change of welding parameters
such as current and travel speed. Other authors [12-14] found that different values of these parameters cause the
change in the heat input and in the dilution as a consequence. Moreover, their studies demonstrated that nickel-base
powders used as hardfacing material can also improve the corrosion resistance of a steel product. For improving the
wear resistance properties of the substrate, tungsten carbides (WC) can be usefully added to the nickel-base powders.
After the deposition of the powders, the nickel matrix acts as a binder for the tungsten carbide particles. Carbides
of different elements, such as tungsten, vanadium, chromium and titanium, can be mixed in different proportions
to nickel-base powders and be applied on a steel product to improve its surface properties [15]. Balamurugan and
Murugan [16] studied the optimization of the PTA process for weld overlays reinforced by TiC particles. It should
be mentioned that several parameters in the PTA process, such as current, feeding rate and travel speed, have a
direct effect on surface quality [17,18].
Weld bead is an important geometric parameter able to define the properties of the hardfaced layer: several
studies demonstrated that there is a close relation between the weld bead shape and the quality of the layer [19-21].
Considering the different type of equipment, powder mixtures and process parameters, many combinations of the
specifications could be used to find an appropriate welding procedure. To minimize this combination of parameters,
it would be useful to use the Design of Experiment (DoE) method. As a result, it is possible to decrease the number
of test runs, to obtain an appropriate weld bead [16]. The effect of the feeding rate and travel speed on the quality of
a nickel-based hardfacing layer applied on low carbon steels was reported by Ming et al. [22] and Lim et al. [23]. Palani
and Murugan [24,25] investigated the optimization of parameters for the weld overlay of stainless steel on carbon
steel. Davis [16] tried to find appropriate dilution and weld bead geometry by changing the process parameters.
Siva et al. [26] worked on the optimization of the PTA process by using nickel-base powders on stainless steel. Despite
many investigations, there is still a lack of information regarding the optimization of the welding conditions to obtain
appropriate weld bead geometries accompanied with high mechanical and metallurgical properties. The aim of this
study was to identify the best parameters (current, travel speed and preheat) to reach the appropriate hardfaced
layer of nickel base powder mixed with tungsten carbide on the D2 tool steel using the PTA process. Based on
the DoE method, twenty weld overlays with different parameters were performed on the surface of tool steel.
The microstructural properties of each layer were evaluated by means of Optical Microscopy (OM) and Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS). The mechanical properties were studied by
means of hardness tests. Finally, based on the metallurgical features and the weld bead geometry measurements
of the layers, the best-investigated process parameters were detected.
C Si Mn Cr Mo V P S Fe
D2 tool steel 1.58 0.37 0.48 11.52 0.89 0.56 0.017 0.029 Bal.
C Si Cr B W Ni
Hardfacing Matrix 0.6-0.8 3.9-4.9 14.0-16.0 3.0-3.4 - Bal.
powder alloy Reinforcement 6.0-6.2 - - - Bal. -
Figure 5. (a) Macrostructure of one weld overlay and (b) Microstructure of the three different zones.
Figure 6 shows the cross-sections of some selected layers. As can be seen, sample W19 presents more
regular weld bead geometry and a more homogenous distribution of tungsten carbides than the other samples.
In sample W19 the tungsten carbide particles are better distributed through the whole area of the deposited
layer. For most of the other samples, tungsten carbide particles are preferentially distributed at the bottom of
the weld pool. Moreover, different samples present different values of penetration and reinforcement due to the
different process parameters.
Figure 7 shows the microstructure of the D2 tool steel base metal, which mainly consists of Cr7C3 primary
carbides and secondary carbides dispersed in a tempered martensitic matrix [28]. The heat affected zone (HAZ)
is characterized by two different microstructures close to the fusion zone (Figure 8a) and close to the base metal
(Figure 8b), respectively. The reason for the formation of these zones is probably due to the different heating
and cooling rates during the hardfacing process. The typical microstructure of the nickel-based hardfacing layer
Figure 7. Microstructure of the base metal (a) 500X; and (b) 1000X.
is shown in Figure 9 and is characterized by a γ-Ni primary hypereutectic dendritic phase and a lamellar eutectic
structure in the interdendritic regions [29]. Blocky-shaped tungsten carbide particles are distributed in the layer and
are clearly visible in Figure 9a. Because of their high density, the volume fraction of tungsten carbides close to the
top surface of the layer is lower than in the area at the bottom of the weld pool close to the substrate (Figure 10).
Figure 8. Microstructure of the heat affected zone (a) close to the fusion zone and (b) close to the base metal.
Figure 9. Microstructure of the weld overlay: (a) WC particles in the matrix; (b) and (c) dendritic matrix at different
magnification.
is not at the top of the layer because, as explained before, tungsten carbides are mainly present at the bottom of
the layer due to their higher density compared to the matrix. Based on the measured data, for all the samples in the
heat-affected zone, hardness decreases from the fusion zone to the base metal, in agreement with the temperature
evolution during the hardfacing process. In sample W9, the maximum equal hardness value of 800 HV1 was observed
compared to other samples, with hardness of around 600 HV1. The increase in the hardness of sample W9 could
be due to the equal distribution of tungsten carbides and to a partial decomposition of tungsten carbides causing
a solid solution reinforcement of the matrix.
4. Conclusions
In this work a nickel-base powder mixed with tungsten carbide particles was applied by the Plasma Transferred
Arc (PTA) process on the surface of the D2 tool steel. To reach optimum weld bead geometry, a combination of
different process parameters (current, travel speed and preheat) were considered and the following conclusions
can be made:
- Design of experiments was an effective method to study the effect of process parameters on the weld
bead geometry in the PTA process. When the current, penetration and dilution increase, the reinforcement
decreases. When the travel speed increases, penetration decreases, maintaining dilution roughly constant
with a slight increase. The current was the most important process parameter influencing both the geometry
of the weld and the distribution of carbides in the layer;
- The distribution of WC particles in the weld pool was not so homogenous in the weld layer. The carbides
mainly accumulated in the lower part of the layer, close to the base metal. According to only one set of
parameters their distribution was quite uniform in the layer;
- SEM and EDX analysis of the samples showed that, in addition to blocky WC particles, tungsten was dissolved
in the matrix. Complex phases containing tungsten and other carbides former elements were detected in
the layers;
- From the microstructural and geometrical data obtained from the analyzed samples, the optimum parameters
for hardfacing were actually found as: current 86.36 A, travel speed 85 cm/min and preheat 350 °C. With these
parameters, the values of dilution, penetration, reinforcement and bead width were 30.52%, 0.69 mm,
1.43 mm and 6.53 mm, respectively. It is very difficult to find the optimum parameters to obtain high quality
weld bead geometries, but the authors are currently developing a mathematical model to guide the selection
of the best process parameters and more tests will be performed.
Acknowledgements
Ali Tahaei gratefully acknowledges IUSS 1391 of the University of Ferrara (Unife-ENDIF) for its financial
support. Special thanks should also be given to CONACYT for both its financial and experimental support during
the internship at Corporación Mexicana de Investigación en Materiales (Comimsa).
References
[1] Gruzdys E, Meskinis S. Influence of plasma transferred arc [6] Siva K, Murugan N. A study on the influence of PTAW process
process parameters on structure and mechanical properties parameters on pitting corrosion resistance of nickel based
of wear resistive NiCrBSi-WC/Co coatings. Materials Science. overlays. Procedia Engineering. 2013;64:1147-1156. http://
2011;17(2):140-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.17.2.482. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.193.
[2] Díaz VV, Dutra JC, D’Oliveira ASC. Hardfacing by plasma [7] Bourithis E, Tazedakis A, Papadimitriou G. A study on the surface
transferred arc process. Croatia: InTech; 2011 [access 26 jan. treatment of “Calmax” tool steel by a plasma transferred arc
2016]. Available from: www.intechopen.com (PTA) process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology.
[3] Deuis RL, Yellup JM, Subramanian C. Metal-Matrix composite 2002;128(1-3):169-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-
coating by PTA surfacing. Composites Science and Technology. 0136(02)00447-8.
1998;58(2):299-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266- [8] Sudha C, Shankar P, Rao RVS, Thirumurugesan R, Vijayalakshmi
3538(97)00131-0. M, Raj B. Microchemical and microstructural studies in a PTA
[4] Davis JR, Davis & Associates. Metals Handbook, Hardfacing, weld overlay of Ni–Cr–Si–B alloy on AISI 304L stainless steel.
Weld Cladding and Dissimilar Metal Joining. 10th ed. Materials Surface and Coatings Technology. 2008;202(10):2103-2112.
Park: ASM International; 1993. p. 699-823. (ASM Handbook: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.063.
Welding, Brazing and Soldering, 6). [9] Kim HJ, Yoon BH, Lee CH. Wear performance of the Fe-based
[5] Balasubramanian V, Lakshminarayanan AK, Varahamoorthy alloy coatings produced by plasma transferred arc weld-
R, Babu S. Application of response surface methodology to surfacing process. Wear. 2002;249(10-11):846-852. http://
prediction of dilution in plasma transferred arc hardfacing of dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00683-4.
stainless steel on carbon steel. Journal of Iron and Steel Research [10] Nouri M, Abdollah-Zadeh A, Malek F. Effect of welding parameters
International. 2009;16(1):44-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ on dilution and weld bead geometry in cladding. Journal of
S1006-706X(09)60009-1. Materials Science and Technology. 2007;23(6):817-822.
[11] Chatterjee S, Pal TK. Wear behaviour of hardfacing deposits on [21] Kim I-S, Son J-S, Jeung Y-J. Control and optimization of bead
cast iron. Wear. 2003;255(1-6):417-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ width for multi-pass welding in robotic arc welding processes.
S0043-1648(03)00101-7. Austrian Welding Journal. 2001;46:43-46.
[12] Kesavan D, Kamaraj M. The microstructure and high temperature [22] Ming Q, Lim LC, Chen ZD. Laser cladding of nickel-based hardfacing
wear performance of a nickel base hardfaced coating. Surface alloys. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1998;106(2-3):174-182.
and Coatings Technology. 2010;204(24):4034-4043. http://dx.doi. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00524-6.
org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.05.022.
[23] Lim LC, Ming Q, Chen ZC. Microstructures of laser-clad nickel-
[13] Ramachandran CS, Balasubramanian V, Varahamoorthy R. based hardfacing alloys. Surface and Coatings Technology.
Evaluation of dry sliding wear behaviour of plasma transferred 1998;106(2-3):183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-
arc hardfaced stainless steel. International Journal of Iron and 8972(98)00525-8.
Steel Research. 2009;16(4):49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
[24] Palani PK, Murugan N. Optimization of weld bead geometry for
S1006-706X(09)60060-1.
stainless steel claddings deposited by FCAW. Journal of Materials
[14] Zikin A, Hussainova I, Katsich C, Badisch E, Tomastik C. Advanced Processing Technology. 2007;190(1-3):291-299. http://dx.doi.
chromium carbide-based hardfacing. Surface and Coatings org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.035.
Technology. 2012;206(19-20):4270-4278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
surfcoat.2012.04.039. [25] Palani PK, Murugan N. Development of mathematical models
for prediction of weld bead geometry in cladding by flux cored
[15] Yaedu AE, D’Oliveira ASCM. Cobalt based alloy PTA hardfacing arc welding. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
on different substrate steels. Materials Science and Technology. Technology. 2006;30(7-8):669-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
2005;21(4):459-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174328 s00170-005-0101-2.
413X13789824293380.
[26] Siva K, Murugan N, Raghupathy VP. Modelling, analysis and
[16] Balamurugan S, Murugan N. Design of experiment and optimization optimization of weld bead parameters of nickel based overlay
of plasma transferred arc hardfacing on structural steel with deposited by plasma transferred arc surfacing. Computational
Titanium Carbide. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering Materials Science and Surface Engineering. 2009;1(3):174-182.
and Technology. 2014;7(11):2362-2370.
[27] Chandler HE. Heat treater’s guide: practices and procedures
[17] Conde A, Zubiri F, Damborenea YJ. Cladding of Ni–Cr–B–Si coatings
for irons and steels. Materials Park: ASM International; 1994.
with a high power diode laser. Materials Science and Engineering
A. 2002;334(1-2):233-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921- [28] Roberts G. Tool steels. 5th ed. Materials Park: ASM International;
5093(01)01808-1. 1998.
[18] Tobar MJ, Álvarez C, Amado JM, Rodríguez G, Yáñez A. Morphology [29] Fu JW, Yang YS, Guo JJ. Microstructure selection of Fe–Cr–Ni
and characterization of laser clad composite NiCrBSi–WC coatings alloy during directional solidification. International Journal of
on stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2006;200(22- Cast Metals Research. 2010;23(2):119-123. http://dx.doi.org/
23):6313-6317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.093. 10.1179/136404609X12572514498892.
[19] McGlone JC. Weld bead geometry prediction: a review. Metal [30] Li Q, Lei TC, Chen WZ. Microstructural characterization of WC
Construction. 1982;14:378-384. reinforced Ni–Cr–B–Si–C composite coatings. Surface and
Coatings Technology. 1999;114(2-3):285-291. http://dx.doi.
[20] García-Vázquez F, Aguirre A, Arizmendi-Morquecho A, Hernández-
org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00056-0.
García HM, Santiago-Bautista L, Acevedo J, et al. Analysis of weld
bead parameters of overlay deposited on D2 steel components by [31] Bhaskarananda Dasgupta E, Mukherjee S. Optimization of weld
plasma transferred arc (PTA) process. Materials Science Forum. bead parameters of nickel based overlay deposited by plasma
2013;755:39-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ transferred arc surfacing. International Journal of Modern
MSF.755.39. Engineering Research. 2013;3(3):1330-1335.