Uob Q1 2019
Uob Q1 2019
Uob Q1 2019
Q1 2019
ASEAN Winners In The
US-China Trade Conflict
ASIA FOCUS FX STRATEGY
Are We Seeing Trade And Investment Cracks Start To Appear In
Diversion From US-China Trade Rift? The Strong US Dollar Armor
11 JAPAN � 36
ASIA FOCUS
Are We Seeing Trade And Investment Diversion MALAYSIA � 37
From US-China Trade Rift?
MYANMAR � 38
15 PHILIPPINES � 39
SINGAPORE FOCUS
The 2019 SGS Supply Schedule SINGAPORE � 40
SOUTH KOREA � 41
18
MYANMAR FOCUS TAIWAN � 42
Myanmar In Transition: Opportunities & Challenges
THAILAND � 43
20 VIETNAM � 44
US FOCUS
Assessing The Likelihood Of A US Recession In 2019
AUSTRALIA � 45
23 EUROZONE � 46
FX STRATEGY
Cracks Start To Appear In The Strong US Dollar Armor NEW ZEALAND � 47
UNITED KINGDOM � 48
27
COMMODITIES STRATEGY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA � 49
Crude Oil Takes Over The Volatility Baton
From Copper And Gold
FX TECHNICALS � 50
COMMODITIES TECHNICALS � 55
Source: OECD, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Source: Macrobond, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
0
World OECD US Eurozone Japan China
2017 2018 2019
Synchronized Slowdown, US growth will be the sustained job to end 2018 with 4 hikes. We expect the
But Far From Recession In 2019 creation and wage gains but the pace is Fed rate trajectory to remain at three
Global growth in 2018 turned out to likely to ease from around 3% in 2018 to more 25bps hikes in 2019 on the back of
be better than expected, and this was 2% in 2019 due to fading effects of fiscal continued positive growth outlook and US
despite the simmering trade tensions stimulus, softer business spending while wages. But Fed’s likely shift from the well
between US and China. Heading into US housing market may be another source communicated “gradual rate trajectory”
the New Year, we expect global pace to of weakness. to more emphasis on data dependency,
slow in 2019 and there is plenty of good will make the policy path more uncertain.
reasons for that: moderating trade flows, But to be clear, slower growth does If there is a significant weakening of US
continued slowdown in manufacturing not equate to a recession year. Recent economic data or re-escalation of trade
activity as reflected by the PMIs and global concerns about the US growth outlook tensions, then that could warrant a more
electronic cycle downturn, and global was sparked by the first UST yield curve cautious Fed and the risk could be lesser
trade tensions can flare up again which inversion (on 3 Dec) since 2007 as the yield hikes, from 3 to probably just 2, but
may hurt manufacturers both in terms of spread by the 5- and 2-year UST turned certainly not zero.
a slowdown in export orders and weaker negative. Meanwhile, the spread between
business sentiments. China’s GDP growth the 10- and 2-year UST – traditionally Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the
is expected to ease further to 6.3% in seen as a good predictor of recession 4 European Central Bank is finally on the
2019, the slowest pace since 1990, and to 6 quarters ahead– has been narrowing path of normalization, firstly with the end
that will weigh on activities in the rest of (to about 10-11 bps as of 6 Dec) but it is of QE in Dec 2018 followed by the long-
Asia while European growth is also likely still positive. While it is not inconceivable awaited rate hike which we project in
to ease to 1.6%. Japan’s outlook in 2019 that the 10s-2s spread may turn negative 4Q 2019. Bank of Japan is still the least
could be particularly challenging, likely at some point in 2019, putting a forecast likely to normalize its easy monetary
to be dampened to sub-1% given the timeframe of 4 to 6 quarters, that implies policy anytime soon, especially with its
headwinds of trade issues (i.e. potential a recession in 2020/21, not 2019. Like all challenges in growth and downside price
auto tariffs) and a looming sales tax hike good things, we believe that US growth pressures in 2019. Among Asian central
in Oct. will come to an end at some point (i.e. banks, some (like BI and BSP) will follow
business cycle), but that end is not in the Fed but the majority may stay on
2018 has been a robust year for US, 2019, in our view. pause, as growth retreats and inflation
and the economy is still on track to ebbs while trade uncertainty still looms.
expand in 2019 and bag a new record for As such, the US Federal Reserve is China may cut RRR once by early 2019.
uninterrupted expansion. Underpinning almost certain to hike once more in Dec
China 6.9 6.6 6.3 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.4 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.1
Eurozone 2.4 1.9 1.6 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7
Hong Kong 3.8 3.3 2.8 4.6 3.5 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.8
Indonesia 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.2
Japan 1.7 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.4 0.4 1.0 1.2 0.7 1.7 -0.3
Malaysia 5.9 4.8 4.8 5.4 4.5 4.4 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9
Philippines 6.7 6.2 6.5 6.6 6.2 6.1 6.0 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.5
India 7.1 6.7 7.2 7.7 8.2 7.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.2 7.1
Singapore 3.6 3.4 2.5 4.6 4.1 2.1 2.6 1.7 2.5 3.2 2.7
South Korea 3.1 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.8 2.5
Taiwan 2.9 2.7 2.3 3.1 3.3 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.4 2.3
Thailand 3.9 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.6 3.3 4.0 3.7 3.8 4.2 4.2
US (q/q SAAR) 2.2 2.9 2.0 2.2 4.2 2.3 2.5 1.2 2.0 1.2 0.8
Source: CEIC, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
FX 07 Dec 18 1Q19F 2Q19F 3Q19F 4Q19F RATES 07 Dec 18 1Q19F 2Q19F 3Q19F 4Q19F
USD/JPY 113 113 114 115 115 US Fed Funds Rate 2.25 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.25
EUR/USD 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.18 1.20 USD 3M LIBOR 2.77 2.95 3.20 3.45 3.45
GBP/USD 1.28 1.25 1.25 1.26 1.27 US 10Y Treasuries Yield 2.89 3.25 3.35 3.40 3.50
USD/PHP 52.68 53.00 54.00 55.00 55.00 KRW Base Rate 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
USD/SGD 1.37 1.39 1.40 1.41 1.41 VND Refinancing Rate 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.50 6.50
EUR/SGD 1.56 1.60 1.62 1.66 1.69 INR Repo Rate 6.50 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00
The escalation in trade tensions between US and China resulted in the first tranche of tariffs being implemented on US$50bn of goods
by US and China on 6 Jul 2018. The second and latest tranche took effect on 24 Sep when US imposed 10% tariff on US$200bn of
Chinese goods and China levied 5-10% tariff on US$60bn worth of US goods in retaliation.
Despite the temporary ceasefire on trade tariffs as both sides go into a 90-day negotiation period post-G20 (which started on 1 Dec
and will close around early March 2019), the lack of consistent details and even differences based on statements from the White
House and the Chinese government left markets weighing the prospects of a breakthrough in the trade impasse. While our base case
is for a long-drawn negotiation process well into 2019 (i.e. extension to the 90-day negotiation period), we think that there remains
significant risk that the US and China would fail to overcome their differences and are not be able to reach an eventual agreement,
leading to re-escalation in the trade tensions.
Given that Chinese goods will now cost more in the US and vice versa due to the additional tariffs that were already imposed, trade
and investment diversion away from China and the US will be inevitable. This could have a larger impact on China than the US due
to the sheer size of Chinese exports compared to the latter. The disruption to the supply chain will quicken if corporates are becoming
more convinced that the US-China trade dispute will be long-drawn and therefore warrant adjustments to their medium/long-term
strategies.
The American Chamber of Commerce in South China published a recent survey report on the impact of the US-China trade tensions
on businesses and investment decisions. Not surprisingly, nearly 80% of surveyed companies have experienced “serious impact or
negative impact” of the combined tariffs on various business operations. Nearly half of the respondents reported loss in markets to
companies from other countries due to the trade dispute. According to the findings, the top three competitor countries are Vietnam,
Germany and Japan (in order of importance). This will have impact on their investment decisions as more than 60% of the companies
are delaying or canceling investments into China and a similar proportion are considering relocation of some or all manufacturing
out of China. Southeast Asia is the first choice for most respondents planning relocation, suggesting some silver lining for the region.
Even before the US-China trade relations took a turn for the worse, foreign and Chinese companies alike were already looking to the
ASEAN countries for investment opportunities, which include the China-led Belt & Road Initiative. The attractiveness of the ASEAN
region was due in part to the lower wage and production costs, tax incentives and better access to the regional markets. Any further
worsening in US-China trade relations will likely accelerate the flows of investment to the region.
The manufacturing sector in ASEAN could be the biggest beneficiary, having received the largest share of China’s outward direct
investment in the last two years. By industry, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) sees Malaysia and Vietnam as the key beneficiaries
in the information and communications technology (ICT) products segment as the presence of major electronics companies in these
countries will allow for easier redeployment of production and investment to these destinations. Using the same reasoning, Thailand
and Malaysia will stand to gain most in the automotive segment given established export networks in these countries while Vietnam
which is already an important garment production centre, will be able to scale up in the midst of the ongoing US-China tensions.
Based on the preliminary data on trade and investment so far, we believe that trade diversion has yet to become evident (due to front-
loading activities) whereas there are nascent signs of investment pick-up in places such as Thailand, Taiwan and Vietnam, suggesting
diversion of some manufacturing activities into these economies due to the US-China trade tensions. These markets could potentially
benefit most from a shift in supply chain if US-China trade tensions drag on.
As part of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) which will come into effect on 30
Dec 2018, ASEAN countries including Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore and Brunei have a further edge to attract these investments
given the additional benefits to exporters and importers operating from these markets.
US-China Trade Tension: Export Performance (USD, y/y %) China, Foreign Trade, Import, Countries, Import, Value, USD
Source: CEIC, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Source: Macrobond, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
25
15.8
20
14.8
12.6
15
9.6
8.9
8.1
8.0
10
6.4
0
-2.1
-5
-10
PH SK TW TH ID SG CN VN MY
2016 2017 2018 YTD y/y
600 20%
500 16%
10.2%
9.9%
400
8.3%
12%
5.7%
300
5.0%
4.7%
4.0%
3.7%
8%
3.0%
200
100 4%
0 0%
CN EU US JP SK SG MY HK TH ID
US$bn % of total
China: Foreign Direct Investment and Outward Direct Investment Wage Costs In ASEAN Are Mostly Lower Than In China
Source: Macrobond, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Source: CEIC, ILO, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
* Minimum wage
3,788
3,332
2,026
1,639
937
774
405
284
240
207
183
170
133
Japan
Singapore
Hong Kong
Taiwan
Indonesia
Myanmar
Malaysia
South Korea
Cambodia*
China
Philippines
Thailand
Laos
Vietnam
Manufacturing Receives
US-China Trade Tension: Signs of Investment Diversion?
Largest Share Of China’s Investment In ASEAN
Source: CEIC, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Source: CEIC, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
VN FDI: Total Registered Cap (Oct) 27.9 35.9 China's ODI to ASEAN by key sectors (% of total)
100%
21.9
ID Inv Realization: Foreign (Sep) 32.2
80%
19.2 5.4
SK Inward Direct Inv Permitted (Sep) 22.9 13.4
60%
19.0 15.2
MY Funds Inflow: FDI (Jun) 35.3 40%
8.4 17.3
TH Net FDI (Aug) 8.0 20%
22.5
TW Approved Foreign Investment 8.0
7.5 0%
(Oct)
2.6
MM Permitted Enterprise FDI -20%
7.9
Approved (Sep)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
0.9
PH FDI Approved (Jun) USD billion Manufacturing Wholesale and Retail Trade
2.1 Leasing and Commercial Service Construction
Transport, Storage and Postal Service Financial Intermediation
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 Real Estate Electricity, Gas & Water Production and Supply
Farming, Forestry, Animal Husbandry, Fishery Mining
2018 YTD latest 2017 2016 Others
Relocation of supply chain activities to Vietnam is likely to be most pronounced in more basic industries such as wood product furniture,
textile and apparels. For more sophisticated industries with more complex supply chains such as mobile phones, automotive, laptops
and electronics, we may see the shift of activities with lower value-added in the realms of production and assembly, as an initial response
Vietnam in supply-chain adjustment.
1. Intel, Foxconn, LG, and Samsung have recently relocated some parts of their manufacturing to Vietnam.
2. Goertek, the Chinese company assembling Apple’s AirPods, has rerouted all production of the earbuds to Vietnam.
There is potential to increase exports of computer parts to the US and farm products to China such as cassava chips, soybean, seafood,
processed food and frozen food. Potential relocation of investment to Thailand are in industries producing aviation parts, automobile and
parts, computers and parts, electronics, energy equipment, and agricultural machinery.
Indonesia has absolute advantage in resource-based sectors and her commodity exports to China are estimated to arrive as final
consumption products vis-à-vis a raw or intermediate products for re-exporting. It is also expected to see some mild benefits in
ICT and automotive production relocation as a result of the US-China trade tensions. Investments are also rising in the areas of
telecommunications and provision of consumer products, notably dairy-based consumption products.
The top 5 sector investments based on the latest FDI reports suggested the areas of energy provision (electricity, gas, and water supply),
transportation and storage as well as telecommunication, construction-related (real estate, industrial, an office buildings), mining, and
Indonesia non-machinery metal industries continue to be the areas of great interest. These areas are somewhat less affected by the direct effect
of the trade tensions, although indirectly it has been affected through the slowing down of the FDI’s momentum that is seen notably in
Q3 this year
Key iPhone assembler, Taiwan-based electronics manufacturer Pegatron is preparing to shift production of non-iPhone products
(including set-top boxes and other smart devices) hit by U.S. tariffs on Chinese exports to a rented factory on Indonesia's Batam Island
within the next six months.
Based on the central bank’s study, the products that Malaysia would likely gain from trade substitution opportunities are mostly in the
E&E industry, such as electrical machines, electronic integrated circuits and semiconductors for solar panels cells.
1. Large entry of Chinese semiconductor assembly and test player into Malaysia’s semiconductor firm Unisem.
Malaysia 2. MNCs’ enquiries to local outsourced semiconductor and test companies (OSAT) have risen. These include enquiries for the
possibility for OSAT to go downstream in electronics manufacturing and transfer of MNCs’ matured products in China to Malaysia,
which the local companies are not keen due to the labour intensiveness and lower margins.
3. A number of MNCs with existing operations in Penang are in the midst of expanding or planning for expansion. Higher demand for
machines from MNCs operating in Malaysia.
There is increasing interest to establish manufacturing and production facilities in Thilawa Special Economic Zone (SEZ) among the
firms.
Myanmar signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with China in September 2018 agreeing to establish the China-Myanmar
Economic Corridor (CMEC), part of the Belt and Road Initiative. Under the MoU, the governments agree to collaborate in several
Myanmar industries such as transport, basic infrastructure, construction, manufacturing, agriculture and telecommunications.
In November 2018, the Myanmar government and China’s state-owned CITIC Group signed the framework agreement for the proposed
US$1.3 billion deep-sea port in Kyaukphyu. Myanmar is also in the midst of finalizing an agreement to export cattle to meet increasing
Chinese demand.
Economic Planning Secretary Ernesto Pernia said that the US-China trade war should benefit the Philippine economy, helping increase
exports by 5% as the country becomes an alternative source of products and even a site for supply chains. He added that there are
already signs electronics and computer components, previously sourced from China, are now going to the Philippines.
1. Ayala Corp is in talks to provide land to a Chinese company planning to build one of the world’s biggest tile factories in the
Philippines Philippines.
2. Chinese steel company Panhua Group will build a 305-hectare integrated steel manufacturing plant at an industrial estate in
Misamis Oriental Special Economic Zone, with an investment of US$3.5bn.
3. China Gezhouba to invest initial US$2bn in New Clark City to develop 500-hectare mixed-used industrial park in Clark, north of the
capital, which is expected to attract electronics manufacturing companies, technology firms and light industries.
4. New Kinpo Group, a Taiwanese contract electronics maker, looks to build new facilities in the Philippines.
We expect SGS bonds outstanding to increase in line with the 6% average growth rate experienced since implementation of Liquidity
Coverage Ratio (LCR) in 2015.
A 6% growth rate equates to around SGD 7bn of net supply or SGD 23bn of gross supply in 2019.
SG rates are expected to continue their track higher in 2019 while the yield curve could see some steepening impulse from supply
in the first half of the New Year.
Outstanding SGS bonds grew by about 5% per annum on Over the past few years, outstanding SGS bonds have grown
average over the past five years. In the past one to two years, steadily, at around 5% - 8% per annum. Market conditions
there has been increased demand for high quality liquid have been supportive, driven by an increased demand for
assets from financial institutions. Subject to prevailing market high quality liquid assets from financial institutions. MAS
conditions, MAS plans to grow outstanding SGS at a slightly intends to maintain a similar pace of growth for SGS bonds
faster rate in 2018 to meet the higher demand. MAS will in 2019, subject to prevailing market conditions. Increasing
continue to monitor market conditions and calibrate issuance the amount of outstanding SGS bonds will meet the demand
sizes to facilitate an efficient and liquid secondary market. for high quality liquid assets from financial institutions and
improve secondary market liquidity. MAS will continue to
monitor market conditions and calibrate issuance sizes to
facilitate an efficient and liquid secondary market.
MAS released the 2019 SGS auction calendar on the 12th supply growth received a boost stemming from regulatory driven
November. Overall there was no major surprise, but it does contain demand. The implementation of Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
a few tweaks in response to market dynamics seen this year. acted as a demand shock for High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)
which resulted in a doubling of net supply that year to SGD 7.1bn.
In the table above, we’ve highlighted the main difference in language The average annual growth rate in SGS since 2015 has been
between 2019 and 2018’s announcements that accompanies more volatile, ranging from 3.9% to 7.9%, compared to the
the auction calendar. Our takeaway from the statements is that previous period due to the tiered transition phase for regulatory
demand for SGS is expected to mean revert back to historical compliance. This transition period to the LCR regime will be
averages after having experienced above average growth in 2018 complete by 01 January 2019, and with that we are expecting to
and especially in 2015. see year on year SGS growth rates become less volatile. Average
growth rate going forward is likely to oscillate around 6.0% in the
Annual growth in the SGS market from 2008 to 2014 had absence of new demand shocks. Supply shocks, i.e. fiscal deficit
been fairly stable and ranged from 4.0% to 5.6% or around an financing requirements, do not apply since SGS proceeds are ring
average of SGD 3.6bn of net supply each year. In 2015, SGS fenced and cannot be used to pay for Government expenditures.
01/10/2021 3 3,200,000,000
Mini-auctions option for longer maturities 01/04/2022 3 3,400,000,000
Schedule for mini-auctions has been pushed closer together in
01/09/2022 4 6,300,000,000
2019 and coincides with the 2Y SGS re-opens. This offers an
option for alternatives in the event that demand for 2Y bonds turn 01/02/2023 4 2,900,000,000
out to be below expectations. The trade-off is that it leaves the 01/07/2023 4 8,800,000,000
last quarter of the year without a pressure relief valve if demand 01/02/2024 5 New
for SGS duration were to pick up during the supply drought period
01/09/2024 6 6,400,000,000
between Q4 2019 and Q1 2019.
01/06/2025 6 3,900,000,000
Historical seasonality unperturbed 01/06/2026 7 4,200,000,000
The messaging from 2019’s auction calendar is similar to this year 01/03/2027 8 8,300,000,000
when bucketed into quarterly tranches. Seasonal tendencies have
01/05/2028 9 3,000,000,000
not been significantly altered by next year’s supply pipeline. The
30Y re-open in 1Q will remain the focal point from now till auction 01/07/2029 11 2,200,000,000
day and should keep yields at the longer end of the curve supported 01/09/2030 12 4,200,000,000
baring an external shock. Historically, Q2 tends to be associated 01/09/2033 15 5,900,000,000
with a swoon in yields, broadly driven by diminished euphoria from
01/08/2036 18 3,800,000,000
the start of the year; this may turn out to be shallower in 2019 in
light of a mini-auction as well as due to the flatter yield curve. 01/07/2039 21 New
01/04/2042 23 5,100,000,000
Expecting incremental net duration increase for 2019 01/03/2046 27 5,800,000,000
Overall, we expect duration injection in 2019 to be marginally
Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
higher than in 2018. Given the adaptations in the 2019 calendar
with LCR requirements in mind, we see a reasonable likelihood of
mini-auctions being optioned for a longer maturity bond (> 10Y). The SGS Market In 2018
This possibility will increase if issuances from statutory boards SGS Curve
and quasi government entities in 2019 fail to satiate investors Year to date (mid Nov), SGS yields have broadly risen in response
demand for good quality long duration assets. to an ongoing FED tightening cycle. The curvature is flatter with
the 2s30s at 111bps in January falling to 79bps as of 16 November.
However, the aforementioned masks the bifurcation that has
SGS Tenor 2018 Auctions 2019 Auctions Change
occurred in the SGS curve. Specifically, tenors between 10Y
2 2 2 - to 30Y have essentially repriced their yields higher in a parallel
5 2* 3* 1 fashion over the year such that current levels in 10s15s, 10s20s,
and 10s30s are effectively unchanged when compared to their
7 1 1 -
January levels. SGS curve flattening has therefore been driven by
10 1* 2 1
yield gains in the shorter maturities and with the back end of the
15 1 0 -1 curve locked, the 2s10s30s butterfly has richened from 25bps in
20 1 1* 0 January to parity as of 16 November.
30 1 1 0
* Tenor with New Issue
Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
1.20
Jan
2018 SGS vs. UST Spread Range
Apr
20Y Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
Jul
10Y
Oct 0.20
2Y
-0.20
Bondswaps And SGS Discount To UST
SGS performance vs. UST is on track to put in a credible showing -0.40
%
for 2018 as the SGS yield discounts hover close to their year
-0.60
to date range lows across all the benchmark tenors. Deeper
discounts has been the path of least resistance given that the
-0.80
SGS market in this FED hike cycle has generally held onto its
lower beta sensitivity towards overnight changes in UST prices. -1.00
Back to back steepening of the SGD NEER slope by MAS in April 2Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y 30Y
and October has also helped to bolster the appeal of SG assets. 15-Nov-18
0.10
%
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
-0.15
2Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y 30Y
15-Nov-18
Myanmar’s GDP is expected to expand by 6.9% in 2018, mainly driven by improving exports and FDI and manufacturing expansion.
Going forward, the local currency is expected to weaken against the USD as a result of current account deficit and the strengthening USD.
The government passed the Myanmar Investment Law 2016 and the Myanmar Companies Law 2018 so as to attract more foreign
investment.
Myanmar also signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with China for the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC) which
would connect China’s landlocked Yunnan through Mandalay to Yangon and Kyaukphyu on new roads and a high-speed railway.
Although Myanmar is rich with opportunities in many sectors, investors faced several economic and technical challenges that need to be
addressed by the government.
10 5,000 0
8 4,500 200
6 4,000
400
3,500
4
3,000 600
2
2,500 800
0
2,000 1,000
-2
1,500
1,200
-4 1,000
-6 500 1,400
-8 0 1,600
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018F 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Current Account (% Of GDP) GDP Growth (%) Net FDI Inflows (Million USD) USD-MMK Exchange Rate - inverted (RHS)
Exhibit 3: Development Zones In The MIL 2016 Table 1: Investment Benefits For Promoted Industry
69
27
1,705
128
1,241
90.5
Based on the latest Fed Reserve’s US recession probability and excess bond premium (EBP) forward looking indicators, we are unlikely
to see the US economy enter into a downturn in 2019, even as the US Treasury markets saw its first yield curve inversion in more than a
decade on 3 Dec 2018.
Looking ahead into 2019, the current US monetary policy cycle will be on course to converge with the long term neutral rate and the UST
yield curve will also be approaching an inflection point where flattening is no longer the path of least resistance.
What lies ahead at this late cycle phase will depend on how markets manage the transition into an investment environment that is less
forgiving due to diminished liquidity amidst a backdrop of slowing economic activity. The tricky part with transitions, even in the best of
times, is that the process is seldom smooth or linear.
%
increasingly clear that curve flattening 1.0
tailwinds from the rate hike cycle and 0.5
a global hunt for yield are diminishing
0.0
while steepening pressures are
building from deficit financing and -0.5
2. Financial Conditions chart Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
Index
13
incentivized a global hunt for yield
and compression of risk premiums 12
-0.5
has reached a turning point when the
11
FED balance sheet reduction program
-1.0
began in October 2017 and is set 10
to decline more measurably when
the ECB ends its net asset purchase 9 -1.5
2015 2016 2017
program at the end of 2018. Investors G3 Central Bank Balance Sheet (lhs) World Financial Conditions Index (rhs)
should therefore be cognizant of a
possible dawning scenario where the
price of risk undergoes a symmetric
unwind.
3. Volatility table
There has been a nascent reawakening
2018 Late Cycle (since 2000)
of volatility across equity, rates and Indicator Current
currency markets this year and it is a Average Max Average Max
reasonable proposition to make that
Equity Volatility (VIX) 16.4 15.7 37.3 16.7 33.5
the halcyon days for volatility may
be behind us. What lies ahead at 53.1
this late cycle phase will depend on Rates Volatility (MOVE) 53.4 71.8 80.1 123.8
how markets manage the transition 7.7
Currency Volatility (CVIX) 7.5 8.7 8.4 9.3
into an investment environment that
is less forgiving due to diminished Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
liquidity amidst a backdrop of slowing
economic activity. The tricky part with
transitions, even in the best of times,
is that the process is seldom smooth
or linear. Thus, aside from potentially
higher average volatility levels during
late cycles, episodes of volatility spikes
in the later stages can also reach more
extreme levels.
Asia FX Tried Its Best To Steady In 4Q After An Intense Year Of Sell-Off Growth To Stall Or Moderate In 2019
For China And Asean 5
Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
GDP Forecasts 2018 2019
114
China 6.6% 6.3%
112
Singapore 3.4% 2.5%
110
Malaysia 4.8% 4.8%
108
102
Philippines 6.2% 6.5%
Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
Source: UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
Asia Dollar Index (ADXY)
Across October and November, the weakness in most Asian FX Heading into 2019, as negative effects of the protracted trade
panned out largely as anticipated, anchored by further declines in stand-off between Beijing and Washington begin to sink in more
the CNY. Despite dropping for a third straight quarter, the pace of materially, growth slowdown in the most Asia economies would
decline has moderated. become more evident. Amidst this cautious backdrop, regional
central banks are likely to hike rates more carefully and the wide
The Asia Dollar index (ADXY), a popular gauge of Asia FX declined monetary policy gap with the Fed would still underpin a defensive
by 0.3% to 104.46 over the past two months, after dropping 4.2% tone in Asia FX for most part of 2019.
(in 2Q18) and 2.1% (in 3Q18) respectively. Also, volatility in most
Asian FX pairs remains muted, smoothed by measures by various Overall, we are still projecting a further 2.4% to 4.5% slide in most
central banks to mitigate capital outflows and FX interventions. Asia FX against the USD in the first half of 2019. Thereafter, USD
Average implied volatility of USD/Asian FX (SGD, MYR, IDR, strength against Asia FX may taper off in the second half of 2019
THB, CNH) steadied around 6% across October – November, with once we head towards the tail end of the FED’s hiking cycle.
little pass-through from the turbulent equity markets correction
occurring in the same period. Over in G-10, a recovery in the EUR is our conviction view for next
year. We see EUR/USD bottoming and rising gradually across
A swift reversal of the popular consensus trades was the standout next year from 1.15 to 1.20. With that, the Dollar Index (DXY) is
of this quarter. Markets returned to buy PHP, IDR and INR in expected to retreat gradually from 96 to about 93 in the same
November due to oversold conditions and high carry after a year- period. In addition, despite concerns over growth slowdown in
long selloff. The pace of their recovery was also accentuated by a China, the AUD/USD may take advantage to recover above the
rapid fall in oil prices which eased the pressure on their respective 0.77 level.
current-account deficits. With the move, hedging costs and levels
for PHP, IDR and INR have become more attractive for investors
to hedge against further weakness into 2019.
it has not announced any official shift from its “prudent and neutral” New Export Orders Manufacturing PMI
policy. The PBoC has cut the Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR)
for the fourth time this year in early Oct, with the latest cut releasing
RMB 750 billion of liquidity back into the banking system. We Yield Advantage Of China's 10Y Bonds At Its Narrowest
continue to see scope for further RRR cuts in the months ahead, To The US 10Y Treasuries Since 2010
possibly around early 2019 ahead of the Spring Festival. On the Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
other hand, we expect the Fed to hike once more this year (Dec)
4.0
and three times in 2019, bringing the Fed funds rate to a range of
3.7
3.00 – 3.25% by end 2019. 3.4
3.1
Despite the clear divergence in economic data and monetary policy 2.8
2.5
as pointed above, the pace of further RMB weakness may still be 2.2
measured. Markets probably took into account the various targeted 10Y UST yield 10Y CGB yield
measures implemented by the PBoC in the last few months. A 200
20% reserve margin ratio for forward sales of CNY as well as the
reintroduction of Counter Cyclical Factor (CCF) have discouraged 100
speculation and dampened extreme moves in the domestic
currency. Barometers of RMB devaluation pressures such as the
0
CNH forward points and the gap between CNY and CNH remain Dec Mar Jul Nov
low and stable. 10Y China-US yield gap (bps)
5000 1.50
Firstly, the EUR 2.6 trn bond-buying programme will draw to a close
1.45
by the end of December. To a certain extent, the massive stimulus 4500
1.40
plan by the European Central Bank’s (ECB) has kept the EUR/USD
4000 1.35
pinned within a 1.05 to 1.25 range since its implementation in early
2015. So, once the ECB’s balance sheet stops expanding in 2019, 1.30
3500
one of the key pressure point on the EUR could start to alleviate. 1.25
3000
Also, as suggested by ECB President Draghi recently (26-Nov), 1.20
the recent weakening in euro-area growth momentum is likely to 2500 1.15
be “temporary” and unlikely to scupper the withdrawal of monetary 1.10
2000
stimulus. 1.05
1500 1.00
Next, with policymakers still largely confident that they would Dec-08 Jul-10 Mar-12 Nov-13 Jun-15 Feb-17 Oct-18
weather the slowdown, discussions by the ECB about its maiden ECB Balance Sheet (million euros) EUR/USD (RHS)
rate hike would eventually begin in 2019. This is likely to a key
upside catalyst for the EUR especially where pricing for a rate move
higher is very modest now. According to Bloomberg, markets are
Rise In Italian BTP Yield Tops Out,
only pricing in a 6 bps hike in ECB’s deposit rate to -34 bps from Providing A Floor To EUR/USD At 1.12
-40 bps currently. Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
350 1.26
Aside to the growth slowdown, increased risks related to Italy’s
fiscal sustainability also weighed on the EUR over the last couple 1.24
of months. The European Commission had rejected Italy’s draft 300
1.22
budget of a 2.4% (of GDP) deficit for 2019 in Oct and Italy replied
that it would stick to its original spending plans. The stalemate has 250
1.20
resulted in 10-year Italian bonds (BTP) widening to as much as 326
bps above 10-year German bonds (Bunds) on 20-Nov, the widest 1.18
200
since Apr 2013. 1.16
150
That said, the probability of a euro break-up within the next 12 1.14
months is still at a low 12% in Nov, according to latest sentix survey.
100 1.12
The same measure was as high as 73% at the height of the Greek Nov 17 Feb 18 May 18 Aug 18 Nov 18
debt crisis in 2012. Currently, the BTP-Bund spread has stopped 10Y BTP-Bund spread (bps) EUR/USD (RHS)
widening and is steady just below 300 bps and a further stabilization
in 2019 could conversely benefit the EUR.
Recent Italian Budget Crisis Is Less Intense
Going forward, while spot EUR/USD has been attempting to bottom Than The Greek Crisis In 2012
at 1.12 in Nov, risk reversals have already bottomed in Aug and has Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
been grinding higher since. Unless there is a severe escalation in
80
the EU-Italy row, further downside in EUR/USD is limited and the
positive factors mentioned above are likely to spur a sustained rally 70
in 2019. Overall, we see EUR/USD bottoming and rising gradually 60
across next year from 1.15 in 1Q19 to 1.20 in 4Q19.
50
40
%
30
20
10
0
Jun-12 Oct-13 Feb-15 Jun-16 Oct-17
Probability of Euro Break-Up in 12 Months
2.20
As the Fed approaches its neutral rate, which we estimate is at about
3% (current: 2.00% - 2.25%), there is increased market speculation 2.00
of a further graduation in hiking trajectory or even a rate pause in
1.80
the coming year. On 29-Nov, FOMC Chairman Jerome Powell said
interest rates remain “just below” the neutral rate, which is seen as 1.60
a significant departure from his hawkish comments made on 3 Oct Dec 17 Feb 18 Apr 18 Jun 18 Aug 18 Oct 18
when he said “we may go past neutral”. Powell reiterated there is Fed Funds Rate in Dec 2019 (%, as implied by OIS)
no pre-set policy path and the Fed is paying “very close attention”
to data. Should US data start to underperform estimates in the
coming year, the Fed could hike lesser than expected. Our base A Sudden Plunge In Oil Prices Over The Last 2 Months
case remains that of 3 rate hikes across 2019. Further downward May Cap Any Runaway Inflation Expectation Next Year
expectation of Fed rate hikes may put downside risks to our USD Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
forecasts.
90
55
Nov 17 Feb 18 May 18 Aug 18 Nov 18
Brent Crude, USD per barrel
Acute Correction Wipes Out All Of Brent Crude Oil's Gains For The Year
130
125
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Apr 18 May 18 Jun 18 Jul 18 Aug 18 Oct 18 Nov 18
Gold Spot (USD / oz) Brent Crude Oil (USD / bbl) 3M LME Copper (USD / MT)
As the US Federal Reserve continued to hike into the on-going Elsewhere, in the energy space, crude oil stole the limelight for
US-China trade row, investor concerns over the potential negative all the wrong reasons. Global investors and industry players were
impact on global growth and activity intensified. All these cumulated completely blindsided by the last minute “leniency” from the Trump
in the intense sell-off in crude oil across 4Q in which all of its administration which granted temporary waivers for continued
painstaking gain made since the start of the year was erased in just import of Iranian crude oil. The conversation for crude oil suddenly
under 6 weeks. As volatility in crude oil spiked, gold and copper flipped from a potential supply deficit due to the Iran export sanction
were contend to stay out of the limelight and instead consolidated to the renewed supply overhang due to global growth slowdown.
around familiar levels without much fanfare across 4Q. As such, both Brent and WTI crude oil collapsed by more than 1/3
from their respective peaks in Oct. Have we seen the worst for
Specifically in the precious metals space, gold performed much- crude oil?
better-than expected as it managed to stay afloat over the past 2
months above the psychological USD 1,200 / oz level. This was Finally, in the industrial metals space, LME Copper was the exact
after it successfully fought off an initial sell-off in mid-August to antithesis of crude oil. After suffering an earlier heart stopping 20%
as low as USD 1,160 / oz. It would appear that the long running sell-off across 3Q as prices collapsed from as high as USD 7,300
inverse relationship between ever rising US rates and lower gold / MT in early Jun to as low as USD 5,800 / MT in mid Aug, LME
prices has now weakened. Is there now a new driving factor for Copper has so far managed to stay out of the limelight, spending
gold? the past 3 months obediently range trading within a very tight band
from USD 6,000 / MT to USD 6,300 / MT. There was no news of
any labor unrests in key copper mines. Neither was there any news
of large ticket stop losses from speculative trading positions. Has
Copper turned over a new leaf?
US-China Uncertainty
Increasingly Weighing On
Trade And Consumption Demand
Hong Kong’s GDP growth continued to
be marked lower as expected, falling to
2.9% y/y in 3Q18 from 3.5% in 2Q18. This
3-Month Interbank Rates, Daily, (%)
was the slowest quarterly growth pace in
two years. Other than the US-China trade Source: Macrobond, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
tensions related drag, Typhoon Mangkhut
which hit in September was likely to have
contributed to the weaker tourism and
consumption data in 3Q18. And despite
sustained strength in the labour market
(the seasonally adjusted unemployment
rate has remained at a 20-year low of 2.8%
in 3Q18), sentiment soured due to the
weakness in the financial markets as the
Hang Seng index entered a bear market
in the 3Q after dropping 20% from its peak
in January. The positive surprise came
from fixed investment which was helped
by a low base but the cautious economic
outlook will likely cap further gains ahead.
The government noted that the negative
impact from US-China trade tensions have
started to surface, affecting re-exports of Inflation To Stay Largely Stable a result, the aggregate balance though still
mainland origin goods to the US that are Hong Kong’s headline composite inflation at the lowest since 2008, was stable since
implemented with additional tariffs, though edged higher to 2.4% y/y in January- at about HKD 76 bn.
these constituted only about 15% of Hong October from average 1.5% in 2017. This
Kong's total exports to the US in 3Q18. had been mainly driven by higher utilities Going forward, Hong Kong’s economic
and food prices while durable goods growth is expected to moderate further
All in all, we foresee a weaker growth trend maintained a deflationary trend. The in 2019, to 2.8% from 3.3% in 2018. In
for Hong Kong ahead as the negative inflation is likely to stay reasonably stable addition, the high dependency on trade
impact from the trade tensions is expected in 2019 despite weaker economic growth makes Hong Kong’s economy vulnerable
to become more evident ahead while as higher domestic costs and feedthrough to further deterioration in US-China trade
the tightening financial conditions could from the upward adjustment in the ceiling relations. Also, a widening gap between
increase market volatility. Higher domestic of the government’s rates concession from local (3M Hibor) and US (3M Libor) rates,
interest rate environment is set to weigh 2Q18 will continue to exert some mild currently at 71bp is likely to buoy the USD/
on the outlook as Hong Kong banks hiked upward pressure in the coming months. HKD towards the top end of its 7.75 to 7.85
their prime rates in September for the first We expect inflation rate of 2.4% in 2018 convertibility band. Then, the HKMA will
time in more than a decade. and 2019. need to resume its regular intervention to
ensure that the rise in HKD Hibor keeps
Looking ahead, we see further moderation USD/HKD To Stabilize Around 7.80 pace with further projected US rate hikes.
in 4Q18 GDP growth to 2.4% with our full- Since late August, as the HKD shied As for the USD/HKD, it is still expected to
year growth forecast at 3.3%. We maintain away from 7.85, the weak side limit of its be capped at 7.85 and average 7.80 for the
our 2019 growth rate at 2.8%, with risks convertibility band against the USD, the next 4 quarters. Prevailing spot of USD/
tilted to the downside. Hong Kong economy Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) HKD is 7.81.
is amongst the most vulnerable to the US- had not conducted any FX intervention. As
China trade conflicts.
3.0 12500
2.0 12000
Growth Slowed In Q3 And May 1.0 11500
Extend Into 2019 Amidst Tighter 0.0 11000
Policies May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17 Nov-17 May-18 Nov-18
Indonesian economy grew by 5.17% BI Policy Rate (%) Rupiah (vs USD)
yoy in Q3 2018 versus 5.27% in the
preceding quarter. Growth is driven by all
components, where the highest growth Where The Fed Goes, face some downside risks if US economic
is recorded by imports growth at 14.1% BI Will Likely Follow data weakens significantly or the US-
yoy, followed by exports at 7.5%. As for Indonesia’s inflation remained stable so China trade tension re-escalates. For
domestic demand, investment spending far as no supply disruption was evident now, we keep our 25bps/quarter rate hike
growth continue to be robust at close to and as volatile prices component remain forecast, each in Q1, Q2, and Q3 2019
7% yoy growth, exceeding government manageable even as we enter year-end consecutively to reach 6.75% by the end
spending at 6.3% and household festivities and holiday season. Our inflation of 2019.
consumption at 5.0% despite strong forecast (year-average) of 3.5% remains
imports growth. We remain cautious on unchanged and it is right in the middle of IDR Outlook: The Worst May Be Over
the uncertainty in the external front as the Bank Indonesia’s (BI) inflation target of But Still Expect Gradual Weakness
US-China trade tension continue and the 2.5-4.5%. Bank Indonesia (BI) has thus far Towards 14,800 In 2019
US Fed continue on its hiking trajectory for raised the BI 7-day Reverse Repo Rate by To a certain extent, BI’s pre-emptive, front-
the rest of this year and going into 2019, a cumulative 175bps to reach the current loading, and ahead-of-the-curve strategy
though recent rhetoric suggested less level of 6.00% since May 2018. The series of managing IDR’s weakness has paid
hawkish stance. of rate hikes decision remain consistent off in 4Q18. Since early Nov, IDR has
with BI’s pre-emptive, front-loading, and strengthened abruptly from 15,200 per
We kept our 2018 GDP growth forecast ahead-of-the-curve strategy to anchor the USD to current levels of around 14,400.
unchanged at 5.3% although now we stability of the domestic financial market
may see growth momentum to be stalled against increased uncertainty in the global Notwithstanding the near-term strength,
in 2019 on the back of tighter monetary financial markets. In specific, BI’s decision the macro backdrop behind IDR remains
policy and lower fiscal deficit amidst was made to keep current account challenging next year. Domestically,
consolidation in 2019. We continue to deficit (CAD) from widening further and Indonesia’s current account and fiscal
hold a cautiously optimistic view of the has resulted into more financial stability account are expected to remain in deficit
Indonesian economy in 2019 as domestic in terms of rupiah exchange rate. BI’s albeit some improvements, at -2.5% and
demand remains robust and stability in strategy to keep as minimal a currency -2.0% respectively. This makes the IDR
the external front and the rupiah are more volatility as possible is also complemented vulnerable alongside other Emerging
entrenched. Even though the external by its policy direction in providing domestic Market currencies as the Fed continues its
uncertainty remains, policy mix introduced NDF (DNDF) and FX swap rate at a gradual rate hikes. Externally, Indonesia is
by the government, the central bank, and more competitive pricing as part of its also not spared from trade headwinds due
related policymakers have started to bear ongoing efforts to alleviate spillover from to the protracted trade dispute between
fruits as evident from the capital reversals the external volatility unto the domestic US and China. That said, BI matching of
into Indonesia in the past few weeks in financial market while at the same time the pace of Fed’s tightening in 2019 may
November. Indonesia’s large domestic deepen the financial market further. alleviate pressure on the IDR.
markets and its high private consumption
spending may continue to underpin the Our expectation for the Fed Reserve Overall, we expect the IDR to continue to
growth of the economy, coupled with remains at three 25bps rate hikes in weaken alongside other Asian currencies.
steady investment growth, and a likely 2019 but the Fed policy path is more We forecast USD/IDR at 14,600 in 1Q19,
support from higher exports growth. Our uncertain next year as the Fed shifts 14,700 in 2Q19 and 14,800 in 3Q and
growth forecast for 2019 is currently set at emphasis to data dependence. So our 4Q19. Prevailing spot of USD/IDR is
5.2%. 75bps cumulative rate hike in 2019 may 14,400.
Other Services
Power
Communication
Industrial Estate
Real Estate
Construction
Manufacturing
Oil & Gas
Mining
Livestock &
Agriculture
Transport &
Fishery
Strong Growth Amid Trade Tensions
Myanmar’s economic outlook is still
favorable, with expected growth around
6.9% in 2018. The economic growth is
driven by a recovery in agriculture and
expansion in manufacturing activities.
Looking ahead, the economic expansion The Ease Of Doing Business has To Be Improved To Attract More FDI
is expected to pick up further to 7% for Source: World Bank, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research
2019 on the back of higher public spending
and improving exports in agricultural
172
products, garments and light manufactured
goods. The fiscal spending will focus on
infrastructure development, particularly in
electricity, energy, and transportation, and 171 171 171
Current account (% of GDP) 7.0 5.1 4.7 4.2 Steel Pdt (share: 6.0%) -0.4
Petroleum Pdt (share: 6.1%) 36.3
Fiscal balance (% of GDP) -2.3 -1.7 -1.8 -1.8
Auto (share: 7.3%) -4.1
Vessel (share: 7.4%) -54.4
Petrochem (share: 7.8%) 13.9
Gen Machinery (share: 8.5%) 11.4
No Strong Growth Catalyst Ahead
Semicon (2017 export share: 17.1%) % change y/y 33.5
South Korea’s GDP growth moderated to
2.0% y/y in 3Q18 from stable growth rate -80.0 -60.0 -40.0 -20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
of 2.8% in each of the three preceding Jan-Nov 2018 2017
quarters. This was also the slowest pace of
growth since 3Q09, due largely to a deeper
contraction in investment in building BOK Delivers First Rate Hike KRW Outlook: Near Term Strength
construction and civil engineering as well For The Year, Extended Pause Ahead Unlikely To Persist
as reduction in machinery investment. The Bank of Korea (BOK) raised its Despite strengthening to its strongest
benchmark base rate by 25 bps to 1.75% levels in 2 months against the USD at about
The lack of a strong growth catalyst in November, a year after its previous hike 1,108, the KRW still faces a long list of
ahead is expected to keep the economic in November 2017. The rate hike was challenges going into next year. Economic
expansion tepid. Private consumption primarily meant to address risk of financial growth has moderated starting 3Q18
is likely to be weighed down by a imbalance and also to narrow the gap with and should remain weak as the negative
fragile outlook in the domestic labour US rates. effects of the protracted trade dispute US
market as the unemployment rate rose and China show up more prominently in
to an 8-year high in 3Q18, averaging Inflation remains contained with the 2019 (barring a significant breakthrough
4.0% from 3.8% in 2Q18. The hike in central bank reiterating in November that in negotiations). A concurrent slowdown
minimum wages which was intended to inflationary pressures on the demand in the global electronics cycle would also
spur demand (under President Moon’s side will not be high for the time being. weigh on the KRW.
signature “income-driven growth” policy) There had been little translation of the
had instead burdened small businesses higher minimum wage to core inflation. In addition, the KRW is not expected to
and contributed to more cautious hiring. Core inflation remained mild at 1.3% y/y in receive any near-term support from the
The minimum wage is set to rise a further November and is expected to rise gradually BoK, which is likely to stay on hold through
10.9% in 2019 after the 16.4% in 2018. in 2019. Meanwhile, headline inflation 1H2019. Overall, we expect KRW to pare
had been driven by higher food prices recent gains and eventually weaken past
The concurrent cyclical downturn in the in the last few months and is expected 2018 low of 1,145 to the USD. We forecast
tech sector (semiconductor exports have to “remain near the target level for some USD/KRW at 1,130 in 1Q19, 1,150 in
been the largest contributor to export time, and then fall slightly and fluctuate in 2Q19 and 1,160 in both 3Q and 4Q19.
growth this year) and weaker Chinese the mid- to upper-1% range.” Our headline Prevailing spot reference is 1,110.
growth as well as trade uncertainties will inflation forecasts for 2018 and 2019 are
also be negative for the external demand. at 1.6% and 1.9% respectively.
On a 3mma basis, exports have remained
in low growth territory, consistent with a While BOK Governor Lee pointed out that
moderate outlook. The temporary 15% the policy rate is not at a neutral level
fuel tax cut, KRW15 tn of financial support yet, the weaker growth and contained
to SMEs and support for companies in the domestic inflation should see the BOK
shipbuilding and auto sectors undergoing retaining its very gradual pace in monetary
restructuring, may only provide a small normalization. We expect the central
respite to growth. bank to stay on hold through 1H2019.
There remains a small chance of a hike
With GDP growth at 2.5% y/y in Jan-Sep, in 2H2019, assuming no major surprises
we forecast that the full-year 2018 growth in domestic economic conditions or rate
will be around 2.5% and the economy is normalization trajectory in the major
likely to maintain growth at 2.5% in 2019. economies.
This is below the BOK’s October forecast
of 2.7% in both 2018 and 2019.
1.7
Robust Growth But Challenges Ahead 1.1
Australia Economy:
Weak Spending And Trade To Weigh
Australian economic growth slowed in the
July-September quarter, driven largely
by a slowdown in household spending.
GDP grew by 0.3% q/q in seasonally
adjusted chain volume terms, missing Household Consumption Remains Weak
forecasts for an increase of 0.6% q/q.
Source: Macrobond, UOB Global Economic Economics & Markets Research
It was the weakest quarterly expansion
since the economy contracted in the
September quarter of 2016. The economy
grew by 0.9% q/q in the prior quarter,
unchanged from the previous estimate.
On a yearly basis, GDP expanded 2.8%
y/y in 3Q, again missing expectations for
3.3% y/y, and down from a revised 3.1%
gain in the three months prior. Weaker
household spending and investment
weighed on growth. Private consumption
slowed to 2.5% y/y in 3Q from 2.9% y/y
in 2Q. Private investment fell 1.2% y/y in
3Q following an increase of 9.1% in 2Q.
Whilst net exports strengthened, a sharp
slowdown in imports was seen. Part of
this was due to the lower cost of imported
fuel. Imports of capital goods also slowed. return to target is expected, although this lows of 0.7021 and sustain spot above
Government consumption and investment progress is likely to be gradual. Taking 0.71 ever since. The recent tariff truce
both picked up, but not sufficient to offset account of the available information, the reached between US and China on 1-Dec
the slowdown in private demand. The Board judged that holding the stance of also fueled a further recovery towards
latest result means the RBA’s forecast for monetary policy unchanged at this meeting 0.74.
the economy to grow 3.5% y/y in 2018 is would be consistent with sustainable
unlikely to be achieved. We expect GDP growth in the economy and achieving the Although the macro backdrop both
growth of 3.0% for the year, and then for inflation target over time”. The latest GDP domestic and external remains
the economy to slow further to 2.8% in print is certainly a big miss relative to RBA challenging, it appears that the bulk of
2019. expectations. Whilst the bigger picture of the AUD weakness may be behind us.
a gradually tightening labour market and The negative positioning (as per CFTC)
RBA: To Extend Record Spell a slow lift in wages growth remains intact, against the AUD is already showing signs
Of Steady Rates we see no change in policy until at least of reversing from the most extreme levels
The RBA held its OCR at 1.5% at its last end-2019. The first RBA meeting for 2019 in over 3 years, setting the stage for a
meeting for the year. The concluding is scheduled for 5 February. more sustainable recovery in AUD. Going
paragraph of December’s accompanying forward, we expect AUD to draw support
statement was exactly the same as the AUD: On Track across 2019 from improved pricing for an
one in November, with the central bank For A Modest Recovery In 2019 eventual rate hike by RBA. Our updated
saying that: “The low level of interest rates A “long and very good conversation” forecasts for AUD/USD are 0.74 in 1Q19,
is continuing to support the Australian between President Trump and President 0.75 in 2Q19, 0.76 in 3Q19 and 0.77 in
economy. Further progress in reducing Xi on trade in early Nov was the key 4Q19. The prevailing spot is 0.73.
unemployment and having inflation catalyst that jolted AUD/USD off 32-month
Eurozone Economy:
To Slow Even Further In 2019
Growth in the Eurozone slowed
significantly in the third quarter, as Italy’s
economic troubles weighed and car
production in Germany was disrupted.
GDP in the 19-country single currency area Euro Area Inflation Eases As ECB Approaches End Of Bond Buying
rose just 0.2% q/q from July to September,
Source: Macrobond, UOB Global Economic Economics & Markets Research
confirming its earlier preliminary flash
estimate from 30 October. This was the
slowest rate of economic growth since the
second quarter of 2014. The economy of
Germany contracted by 0.2%, France’s
was 0.4% stronger, whilst Italy’s was
unchanged in the quarter. It was also
confirmed that the year-on-year GDP
growth rate was 1.7% y/y, the lowest level
since the fourth quarter of 2014. Overall,
GDP growth in the Eurozone is likely to
be slower in 2019 than this year. Whilst
monetary policy will continue to remain
supportive of domestic demand, factors
that may slow down economic growth in
the region include the lack of structural
reform in the Eurozone, including fiscal
fragilities, and in some countries, public for policy rates, we are not anticipating any Nov, said the recent weakening in euro-
and private debt overhang. rate increases until much later in 2019 – area growth momentum is likely to be
which will lift the deposit rate to 0% (from “temporary” and unlikely to scupper the
ECB: Policy Moves To Be Gradual -0.4% currently) and the refi rate to 0.25% withdrawal of monetary stimulus.
At its 25 October meeting, the ECB (from 0% currently) by the end of 2019.
reaffirmed that its asset purchase scheme With policymakers still largely confident
will end in December 2018 and that EUR: Ingredients For A Sustained that they would weather the slowdown,
interest rates could rise after next summer, Recovery Are Falling In Place discussions by the ECB about its maiden
sticking to guidance first unveiled in June EUR/USD continues to drift lower for a rate hike would eventually begin in 2019.
and repeated at every meeting since. third straight quarter in 4Q18, weighed by This is likely to a key upside catalyst for
At the press conference, Draghi did not worries about Italy’s fiscal sustainability the EUR especially where pricing for a
answer the question of what the ECB and a slowdown in euro-area growth. rate move higher is very modest now.
would do in the event that no consensus However, these negative factors seem According to Bloomberg, markets are only
on reinvestment policy could be reached to be abating. Recent news report said pricing in a 6 bps hike in ECB’s deposit
in December. We are of the view that the Italian Deputy Premier Matteo Salvini rate to -34 bps from -40 bps currently.
ECB will not be in any rush to give clearer seek to reach an accord with the EU on
guidance, especially given the uncertain the country’s budget that will avoid an Overall, with easing headwinds against the
economic backdrop. In fact, we think excessive deficit procedure against Italy. EUR and the gradual pricing of monetary
that economic forecasts will be revised As a result, the BTP-Bund spread has tightening in Europe, a sustained recovery
down in December, which will offset an stopped widening and is steady just below in EUR is our conviction view within G10
earlier rate hike expectation than what is 300 bps (high of 326 bps on 20-Nov) currencies. Overall, we see EUR/USD
currently priced in (around October 2019). and a further stabilization in 2019 could bottoming and rising gradually across next
Nonetheless, we still expect net asset conversely benefit the EUR. In addition, year from 1.15 in 1Q19 to 1.20 in 4Q19.
purchases to end in December 2018. As ECB President Draghi, as recent as 26- Prevailing spot of EUR/USD is 1.13.
11 December 2018
UK Parliament Vote
Early 2019
EU Withdrawal
YES Agreement
Introduced
NO
REJECTED PASSED
21 days for UK
Government to put
forward new plan
USD/SGD touched 1.3872 in mid-October and retested the level in early-November with a high of 1.3873. In view of the overbought
condition and waning upward momentum, the inability to break clearly above the strong 1.3880/1.3900 resistance zone was not exactly
surprising. At the time of writing in early-December, USD/SGD just broke below the strong rising trend-line support at 1.3685. The break
of this support does not bode well for USD/SGD as it suggests that the 1.3873 high is a significant peak. Going into the first quarter of
2019, USD /SGD is unlikely to threaten the 1.3880/1.3900 zone. However, any weakness is considered as a corrective pull-back and
USD/SGD is unlikely to accelerate lower. That said, there is scope for USD/SGD to move below the late-August low of 1.3607 but the
prospect for a sustained move below the next support at 1.3530 is not high.
EUR/USD: 1.1350
After failing to break above the strong 1.1850 resistance in in late-September (high of 1.1815), EUR/USD dropped to hit a year-to-date
low of 1.1213 in mid-November. Despite the relatively rapid decline, we do not detect a significant improvement in downward momentum.
That said, there is room for EUR/USD to extend its weakness to 1.1150. At the time of writing in early-December, a sustained move below
the next support at 1.1000 within the first quarter of 2019 seems unlikely. On the upside, only a move above the declining trend-line
resistance at 1.1620 would indicate the weakness in EUR/USD has stabilized.
The rebound in GBP/USD from the mid-August low of 1.2662 touched 1.3295 in mid-September. The subsequent price action since mid-
September has been choppy but at the time of writing in early-December, downward momentum has picked up and a break of 1.2662
would not be surprising. A break of this level could pressure GBP/USD further even though the next support near 1.2450 may not yield
so easily. Resistance is at 1.2930 but only a move above 1.3000 would indicate the weakness in GBP/USD has stabilized.
AUD/USD: 0.7370
The round-number 0.7000 support level remains intact as AUD/USD staged a robust rebound after touching a low of 0.7021 in late-
October. AUD/USD has likely found an intermediate bottom at 0.7021 and a move back below this level within the first three months of
2019 seems highly unlikely (0.7140 is already a strong support level). At the time of writing in early-December, the strength in AUD/USD
is deemed as a corrective rebound and for the next 2 to 3 months, any further up-move could be limited to a test of major resistance near
0.7580 (0.7578 is the 50% retracement of the drop from 0.8136 to 0.7021, see chart above). Looking further ahead, AUD/USD could
strengthen further to 0.7680 but this level is unlikely come into the picture within the first quarter of 2019.
USD/JPY rose to a high of 114.54 in early-October but failed to make a clear break of the November 2017 high of 114.72. The rapid pull-
back from 114.54 and the subsequent ‘listless’ price action suggests USD/JPY is still trading within a broad consolidation range. At the
time of writing in early-December, there is no indication that USD/JPY is ready to embark on a directional move. In other words, USD/JPY
is expected to trade sideways in the first quarter of 2019 even though the underlying tone has improved slightly and this could translate
into a higher trading range of 111.50/115.50.
EUR/SGD: 1.5530
EUR/SGD traded in a choppy manner in Q3 as it rose to a high of 1.6112 in late-September before dropping swiftly and sharply. At the
time of writing in early-December, EUR/SGD appears to be poised to move below the June’s 2018 low of 1.5495. Downward momentum
has improved and not only would a break of 1.5495 not be surprising, we also see chance of EUR/SGD moving below the 1.5400 level.
The next major support at 1.5200 is however, likely out of reach. All in, we expect EUR/SGD to stay under pressure in the first quarter
of 2019 and only a move back above 1.5750 would indicate that the weakness has stabilized.
At the time of writing in early-December, GBP/SGD just edged below 1.7445 and hit a fresh 2018 low. The break of the strong 1.7445
level coupled with the rapid pick-up in downward momentum suggests further GBP/SGD weakness in the first quarter of 2019. Barring
a move above 1.7750, GBP/SGD is expected to move below the next support at 1.7300. Further decline to the next support at 1.7105 is
not ruled out but at the time of writing, the prospect for a break of this level is not that high.
AUD/SGD: 1.0070
AUD/SGD attempted but failed to break below the 2016 low near 0.9700. The relatively sharp and swift rebound from the late-October low
of 0.9706 suggests AUD/SGD has likely found a bottom and in the first quarter of 2019, we do not expect 0.9700 to come into the picture
(0.9800 is already a strong support level). At the time of writing in early-December, AUD/SGD just broke above the strong declining trend-
line resistance near 1.0070. Further AUD/SGD would not be surprising even though any strength is viewed as a ‘corrective recovery’ and
the major 1.0240 resistance is unlikely to break so easily. The next resistance above 1.0240 is closer to 1.0330.
JPY/SGD just broke below the major rising trend-line support at 1.2040 at the time in early-December. While the break of the trend-line
suggests further JPY/SGD weakness in the coming few months, no significant improvement in downward momentum is detected and
the 2016 low near 1.1708 is unlikely to come under threat. That said, JPY/SGD is expected to stay under pressure and only a break of
1.2300 would indicate that downward pressure has eased.
Disclaimer
This publication is strictly for informational purposes only and shall not be transmitted, disclosed, copied or relied upon by any person for whatever
purpose, and is also not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country where such distribution or use would be contrary to its laws or
regulations. This publication is not an offer, recommendation, solicitation or advice to buy or sell any investment product/securities/instruments. Nothing in
this publication constitutes accounting, legal, regulatory, tax, financial or other advice. Please consult your own professional advisors about the suitability
of any investment product/securities/ instruments for your investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs.
The information contained in this publication is based on certain assumptions and analysis of publicly available information and reflects prevailing
conditions as of the date of the publication. Any opinions, projections and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or performance of,
including but not limited to, countries, markets or companies are not necessarily indicative of, and may differ from actual events or results. The views
expressed within this publication are solely those of the author’s and are independent of the actual trading positions of United Overseas Bank Limited, its
subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers and employees (“UOB Group”). Views expressed reflect the author’s judgment as at the date of this publication
and are subject to change.
UOB Group may have positions or other interests in, and may effect transactions in the securities/instruments mentioned in the publication. UOB Group
may have also issued other reports, publications or documents expressing views which are different from those stated in this publication. Although every
reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy, completeness and objectivity of the information contained in this publication, UOB Group makes
no representation or warranty, whether express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness and objectivity and accept no responsibility or liability relating
to any losses or damages howsoever suffered by any person arising from any reliance on the views expressed or information in this publication.
United Overseas Bank Limited
Company Registration No.: 193500026Z
Head Office
80 Raffles Place
UOB Plaza
Singapore 048624
Telephone: (65) 6533 9898
Facsimile: (65) 6534 2334
www.uobgroup.com