Bennett Jones - Ontario and Toronto Land Transfer Tax
Bennett Jones - Ontario and Toronto Land Transfer Tax
Bennett Jones - Ontario and Toronto Land Transfer Tax
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................................1
9. Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................................................21
Notes.........................................................................................................................................................................................................22
The 2018 Ontario and Toronto Land Transfer Tax Update was originally presented
by Jane C. Helmstadter at the Definitive Tax-Planning Conference for Advisers to
Owner-Managed Businesses by the Canadian Tax Foundation on October 22-23, 2018.
bennettjones.com
3. Tax on Unregistered Dispositions: Section 3 Tax
is payable with respect to a transaction which may be statement of adjustments for the transaction, copy of
exempt from time to time under the Land Transfer Tax Act the agreement pursuant to which the beneficial interest
or any other statute of the Province of Ontario”, although, was conveyed (if distinct from the purchase agreement),
as of the date of publication of this paper, the city has not copy of the nominee agreement(s) pursuant to which the
updated its posted materials to speak to such quarterly nominee holds title for the beneficial owner, copies of the
filings. partnership agreement and register of partners for any
Note that part 4(d) of this paper discusses taxation of partnership beneficial owner (which is not in a prescribed
these interests in general, and part 7(c) of this paper form but can be similar to a shareholders’ register or
discusses the de minimis exemption that applies to these simply a list of partners), and forms authorizing a law
conveyances in certain circumstances. firm to represent the named transferee (if the return is
being submitted by a law firm). Guides to the preparation
of this material are available online.13
How is the Tax Paid?
2. Conveyances of interests in “layered” or “stacked’
1. Conventional conveyances partnerships or trusts
Unlike registered conveyances, tax payable under section Concurrently with the passage of the Timing Regulation,
3 must be paid by submitting a certified cheque, hard- the Ministry published an alternate form of hard-copy
copy return, and supporting materials to the Ministry, return which form must be used for conveyances
rather than to the land registry office.9 If the land in of interests in “layered” or “stacked” partnerships
question is located in the City of Toronto, true copies of or trusts (see part 3(c)(ii) of this paper for further
all documents submitted to the Ministry must also be details about these conveyances).14 This alternate form
submitted to the City of Toronto along with the municipal permits consolidated quarterly filings for these types
portion of the tax payable.10 The obligation to submit of conveyances and requires similar information to
a return lies with both the nominee and the beneficial the typical hard-copy return but, in schedule 2 of such
owner, although in practice many include in the covering form, also requires details about the type of disposition
letter to the Ministry enclosing the return a request that and the partner or beneficiary’s interest in the “layered”
the return by the beneficial owner be accepted as the or “stacked’ partnership or trust.15 As of the date of
return by the nominee.11 It is important, in the case of a publication of this paper the City of Toronto had not
nominee that is not owned or controlled by the beneficial published an updated form of return so the appropriate
owner, that nominee keep this obligation in mind. If, for return is, for the time being, the existing City of Toronto
example, in the case of a fund which is structured as a form (see note above).
limited partnership, a general partner consents to the
transfer of a partnership interest and the general partner
controls the nominee, it is incumbent upon the general
partner to ensure that the partner who acquires the
interest file its LTT return and note that the return is also
to satisfy the obligations of the nominee under section
5(8).
The form of hard-copy return under the Act is available
online, as is the form required by the Code.12 Along
with the hard-copy return, a copy of the agreement of
purchase and sale pursuant to which the transfer was
effected must be provided. Additionally, the Ministry will
typically request the following supporting documentation:
bennettjones.com
4. Taxation of Certain Transactions
Easements
An easement is a form of tenement, estate, or right to
land and, as such, falls within the definition of “land”
in the Act. A grant or transfer of easement is, therefore,
taxable under section 2 or section 3 just like a freehold
interest in land, with tax payable on the value of the
consideration exchanged.
bennettjones.com
5. Value of the Consideration
bennettjones.com
6. Nil Consideration: No Tax Payable
percent of the land. Since the disposition is for less than Gifts
the whole of the interest, the amount of the consideration Gifts of real property are not specifically excepted
attributable to such disposition is reduced in a like from taxation under the Act, but if the value of the
proportion. consideration passing between the parties is actually
In such situations, as with all beneficial dispositions, zero (absent the transaction being one in which the
a complete return must be filed in hard-copy with the value of the consideration is deemed to be the fair
Ministry, together with the supporting documentation market value of the land), no LTT will be payable. On a
mentioned earlier in this paper. In addition to such registered transfer, specific Teraview statements must be
supporting documentation the Ministry will also typically completed where the transaction is a result of a gift, and
request the partnership register(s) and partnership the relationship between the parties, as well as the reason
agreement(s) of the partnership(s) involved. If there is no for the conveyance, must be set out in the transfer. On
change in beneficial ownership, no return is required to an unregistered disposition, a hard-copy return must be
be filed because no tax is payable.42 filed.44
Relevant to this point, as well as being an interesting
illustration of the difference between section 2 tax and
section 3 tax, and of the increased flexibility that section
3 permits to a transferee, is the 2007 Ontario Court of
Appeal decision Woodbine Cachet West Inc. v. Ontario
(Finance) (“Woodbine”).43 In Woodbine, a nominee title
holder owned land for two beneficial owners; it had
also charged the land to the Bank of Nova Scotia. The
nominee defaulted on the mortgage and the bank sold
the land to a new nominee (Woodbine), who acquired
the land in trust for one of the existing beneficial owners.
The existing beneficial owner argued that it should only
have to pay LTT on the percentage by which it increased
its interest in the land. The Minister, and the court,
disagreed. The decision turned on the fact that the sale
was being completed by the bank through its power of
sale. The bank was not acting as agent for anyone, and it
was selling, pursuant to a registered conveyance under
section 2 of the Act, the entire interest in the property that
the original nominee had mortgaged to it. Accordingly, tax
was payable on the entire purchase price.
Woodbine had essentially been arguing that it should
have the benefit of the flexibility afforded under section
3 of the Act and the court, rightly in our opinion, denied
it that flexibility. In this scenario, it was perhaps not
possible for Woodbine or the bank to complete an
unregistered disposition under section 3, but the case is
illustrative of the differences between the two sections
and how proper tax planning and structuring can have an
important impact.
bennettjones.com
7. Exemptions and Deferrals: No Section 3 Tax Payable
In addition to the undertaking, the Ministry will also affiliate deferral purposes only) be deemed to continue
require a hard-copy submission of a return on the to be an affiliate of the transferee corporation. If a party
acquisition of a beneficial interest in land, a copy intends to rely on section 3(12) for this purpose, it is
of the agreement of purchase and sale, and other critical to keep in mind the following:
supporting documents. Prior to returning the security,
the Ministry will require evidence of the satisfaction of i. Transfer to a nominee: The affiliate deferral cannot
the undertaking, which may include: an affiliation chart be used to avoid section 2 LTT - it applies only to
showing the corporations graphically, details of any unregistered dispositions of a beneficial interest in
name change or amalgamation in the last three years, land under section 3.49 Prior to completing an affiliate
an affidavit of a director of the corporation making deferral, a corporation that holds both legal and
statements to support the information on the chart, beneficial title to land must complete a beneficial
copies of shareholders and directors ledgers, copies of owner to trustee transfer. Such transfer is, itself,
title abstracts, and copies of all registered instruments not taxable (see the section of this paper regarding
since the date of the disposition. situations where section 2 tax is not payable), but is
a prerequisite to completing an affiliate deferral. If,
As noted above in section 5(c)(ii), completion of an however, the corporation already holds only a beneficial
affiliate deferral will eliminate the transferee corporation’s interest in land, no preliminary step is required.
ability to complete a trustee to trustee for same beneficial
owner transfer at any point in the future until the ii. Organize affiliate entities before dissolution and
beneficial ownership changes hands and tax is paid. complete transfer before or concurrently with
The affiliate deferral provisions are useful for any dissolution: section 3(12) specifically states that the
number of restructuring purposes. A person may wish, corporations claiming the deferral must be affiliates
for example to organize a new investment vehicle which “immediately before the winding-up or dissolving”
will receive funds from investors and then acquire and that the deferral is available only in respect of
the beneficial interest to properties already owned by “any disposition of a beneficial interest in land made
affiliated parties. Or a person may wish to transfer the before the winding-up or dissolution of the corporation
beneficial interest in properties from one investment or in the course of any distribution of property of
vehicle to another. In each instance the affiliate deferral the corporation on the winding-up or dissolution.” If
mechanism permits these transactions on a tax-free the dissolution occurs before the affiliate structure
basis. In these examples registered title could be left in is organized, or if the beneficial disposition occurs
the original owner or, by completing a beneficial owner post-dissolution (for example, via a power of attorney
to trustee (or trustee to trustee) registered transfer, granted on dissolution), the deferral will not be
registered title could be transferred to another person to available.
be held for the new beneficial owner. An additional consideration when structuring and
The affiliate deferral provisions can also be used when completing an affiliate deferral is maintenance of clean
a party wishes to wind up or dissolve a corporation that title for the three year period. The Act is clear that if a
holds title to real property. Through section 3(9), the “conveyance or instrument evidencing the disposition
dissolving corporation can transfer its beneficial interest of the beneficial interest in land has been registered”
in real property to another corporation or a corporate the security will not be returned.50 But what exactly
shareholder and have the tax deferred and ultimately constitutes a conveyance or instrument evidencing
cancelled. section 3(12) permits for such a transfer-out the disposition of the beneficial interest in land? The
and subsequent dissolution of a transferor corporation, registration of a conveyance of legal title to the transferee
and provides that the dissolved corporation will (for corporation is such an instrument.51 Additionally, the
bennettjones.com
7. Exemptions and Deferrals: No Section 3 Tax Payable
The changes to the De Minimis Regulation apply equally Assuming that a transaction is structured properly in
to municipal tax pursuant to §760-14 of the Code order to make use of the exemption, the implication of
which states that “No tax is payable with respect to a the De Minimis Regulation and the Act is that no return
transaction which may be exempt from time to time is required to be filed in respect of an acquisition of
under the Land Transfer Tax Act or any other statute of the a beneficial interest in land that does not meet the de
Province of Ontario”. Likewise, if a party is entitled to a minimis threshold. Because the De Minimis Regulation
refund under the Act a refund is also available under the states that section 3 does not apply to transactions that
Code,60 and items that call for the judgment of the city meet the specified criteria, and because section 5(7) of
under the Code are deemed to be satisfied or determined the Act provides that only persons liable to pay tax under
in the same manner as decided by the Ministry under the section 3 must file a return, a partner acquiring a less
Act.61 Note, however, that the city has not published a than five percent entitlement to profit in a partnership
bulletin confirming that it will not reassess or prosecute (assuming the other criteria is met) is not required to file
transactions occurring prior to a certain date, and that notice of same nor a return to the Ministry.
the City has a general six year limitation period for
assessments or reassessments under §760-74 of the
Code.
The revised De Minimis Regulation does not eliminate
the exemption completely. Rather, the amended language
states that the exemption is not available “if the partner
who acquires the partner’s interest in the partnership is a
trust or another partnership”.62
As a result, the exemption may still be used, but not
by “layered” or “stacked’ partnerships or trusts. Where
real estate investment trusts hold their interests in
land through a limited partnership, for example, the
exemption is no longer (and is deemed never to have
been) available. In 2016, the retroactive nature of this
De Minimis Regulation was of serious concern and
parties who had completed such transfers scrambled
to review such transactions prior to the end of 2016 to
determine if additional disclosure and payment was
required. Going forward from 2016, greater care must be
taken in structuring new transactions to ensure that the
revised De Minimis Regulation is complied with and no
more than a single trust or partnership is involved in a
transaction that seeks to rely on this exemption (which
may have income tax implications for property owners,
depending on the structure used).
For dispositions of interests in “layered” or “stacked’
partnerships or trusts which are widely held (meaning,
in which 50 or more persons hold an interest), special
timing and submission rules apply to the payment of the
applicable tax. See parts 3(c)(ii) and 3(d)(ii) of this paper
for a discussion about such rules.
bennettjones.com
8. Non-Resident Speculation Tax: Section 2(2.1) Tax
Canada and is controlled, directly or indirectly in any Payment, Reporting, and Statements
manner whatever, within the meaning of section 256
Since December 30, 2017, payment of NRST has been
of the Income Tax Act (Canada), by one or more of the
following: accepted through the Teraview registration system in the
same manner that payment of LTT is accepted, upon
iii. A foreign national. registration of a transfer. Pre-payment of NRST may
likewise be made in the same manner that prepayment
iv. A corporation that is not incorporated in Canada. of LTT to the Ministry of Finance’s offices in Oshawa,
and NRST is accepted along with the payment of LTT
v. A corporation that would, if each share of the
made in connection with an unregistered disposition of a
corporation’s capital stock that is owned by a
beneficial interest in land.
foreign national or by a corporation described in
paragraph 1 were owned by a particular person, One notable change accompanying the introduction
be controlled, directly or indirectly in any manner of NRST is the inclusion of additional statements to
whatever, within the meaning of section 256 of the be made by the transferee in each registered transfer
Income Tax Act (Canada), by the particular person;68 (or hard-copy affidavit for a paper transfer), and in
the hard-copy return required to be filed along with an
By virtue of reference to section 256 of the Income Tax
unregistered disposition of a beneficial interest in land.
Act one must look not only at the de jure control of the
The transferee must state that he/she/it has considered
corporation but also at the de facto control.
the new definitions and terms related to the NRST in
A taxable trustee is a trustee that is itself a foreign entity the Act, and that the conveyance is either subject to the
or that acts as a trustee for a foreign entity, however NRST or not subject to the NRST. If the conveyance is
trustees acting for the following types of trust are not subject to the NRST then the transferee must state
specifically excluded: mutual fund trusts, real estate why - whether because the land is not in the specified
investment trusts, and SIFT trusts (all as defined in region, is not designated land, or the transferee is not
specified sections of the Income Tax Act).69 There are a foreign entity or taxable trustee. If the transferee is a
certain exemptions for persons who are refugees or fall foreign entity or taxable trustee but is stating that tax
under certain immigration programs. There are also is not payable he/she/it must explain the exemption
certain rebates that may be available for persons who being relied upon. Clients and practitioners alike must
become Canadian citizens or permanent residents, are carefully consider these questions, their responses, and
full-time students, or who work full-time in Ontario for ensure proper documentation is obtained and retained to
certain periods. In each case, the property must have support the answers given.71
been used as the principal residence of the person.70
These definitions are purposefully broad and force
institutional investors who acquire NRST-subject lands on
behalf of others to be particularly careful in determining
who their investors are and to what extent the nature of
their investors will affect the tax payable. Though section
2.1(6) of the Act provides a mechanism for apportioning
the consideration between residential and non-residential
lands, there is no such mechanism for apportioning the
consideration between purchasers of lands, only one of
which might be a foreign entity; the existence of a single
foreign entity will subject the entire consideration paid to
NRST. Furthermore, section 3(4.1) of the Act specifically
provides that all purchasers are jointly and severally liable
for the full amount of the NRST payable relating to the
conveyance.
9. Conclusion
Despite being a relatively short piece of legislation flexibility inherent in off-title dispositions, not to mention
focused on a very specific form of taxation, the Act is to the specific rules for affiliate deferrals. Given the host
not as simple as it might first appear. The provisions of of recent changes to the Act, to curb the de minimis
the Act are at times counter-intuitive and often forego exemption, to increase tax rates, and to introduce the
clarity in favour at affording maximum flexibility to the NRST, it seems that LTT disputes and structures will
Ministry. It comes as a surprise to many, for example, become more complex before they become simpler,
that the Land Transfer Tax Act taxes more than just especially if Ontario real estate continues as one of the
transfers of land, including transfers of chattels and driving forces in the provincial economy. Our hope is that
interests in partnerships or trusts that happens to own this paper has provided food for thought and a roadmap
Ontario real estate. Parties also frequently fail to consider of things to consider when structuring transactions and
the specific provisions of section 3 of the Act and the preparing to comply with the Act and its many rules.
4. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(1). 20. Legislation Act, 2006, SO 2006, c 21, Schedule F.
5. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(2). 21. See, for example, Superstars Mississauga Inc. v Ambler-Courtney Ltd., [1993]
OJ No 1871, 15 OR (3d) 437 at para 5.
6. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(3).
22. Unregistered Guide, supra note 15 at part 7.
7. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(2).
23. Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “A Guide for Real Estate Practitioners - Land
8. See: Timing of Tax Payable under Subsection 3(2) of the Act O Reg 343/18 Transfer Tax and the Registration of Conveyances of Land in Ontario”
[Timing Regulation] at s 1(2) and 1(3). (Published June 2010), online: www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/guides/ltt/3250.html
[Registration Guide] at part 3.
9. Act, supra note 1, at s 5(7).
24. Registration Guide, supra note 25.
10. Code, supra note 1, at § 760-42(A).
25. Unregistered Guide, supra note 24 at part 10.
11. Act, supra note 1, at s 5(8); In Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Land Transfer
Tax “De Minimis” Partnership Exemption: Clarifying Amendments for 26. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1).
Certain Dispositions”, (Published February 2016), online: www.fin.gov.
on.ca/publication/ltt-deminimis-amendments-en.pdf [De Minimis Bulletin], 27. CSH Aurora Resthaven Inc. v Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2012 ONSC 4376
the Ministry acknowledges its acceptance of this practice under the heading [CSH] at para 13.
“Filing Returns”, specifically stating: “To help facilitate compliance and
in accordance with its usual practice, the ministry accepts returns and 28. 472601 Ontario Ltd. v Ontario (Minister of Revenue), 1987 Carswell Ont 689,
payments made by a partner on behalf of other partners, as well as by 36 DLR (4th) 738, 47 RPR 91; CSH, supra note 29.
trustee(s) on behalf of beneficiaries.”
29. CSH, supra note 29 at paras 15 and 16.
12. Forms available online: www.forms.ssb.gov.on.ca/mbs/ssb/forms/
ssbforms.nsf/GetFileAttach/013-0775E~1/$File/0775E.pdf; Forms available 30. Assaly v Ontario (Minister of Revenue) (1986), 41 RPR 309, 56 OR (2d) 30, 30
online: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/8e8d-MLTT- DLR (4th) 291.
Return-Acquistion-Beneficial-Interest-Land-Appln-2015.pdf.
31. OPTrust Amaranth 1 Inc. v Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2016 ONSC 3648
13. For provincial guides see: Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Land Transfer Tax [OpTrust].
and the Treatment of Unregistered Dispositions of a Beneficial Interest
in Land” (Published May 2006), online: www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/guides/ 32. Optrust, supra note 33 at para 31.
ltt/guidenote1.html [Unregistered Guide]; for municipal guides see: City
of Toronto, “Instructions for Lawyers”, online: https://www.toronto.ca/ 33. Registration Guide, supra note 25 at s 2.
services-payments/property-taxes-utilities/municipal-land-transfer-tax-mltt/
municipal-land-transfer-tax-mltt-resources-for-lawyers/ 34. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1).
14. Forms available online: http://www.forms.ssb.gov.on.ca/mbs/ssb/forms/ 35. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1), definition of “value of the consideration”, para
ssbforms.nsf/GetFileAttach/013-10016E~1/$File/10016E.pdf (b) and (b.1).
15. See the following bulletin for additional information: “Quarterly Reporting 36. Ibid.
Periods for Land Transfer Tax on Qualifying Unregistered Dispositions
of a Beneficial Interest in Land” at: https://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/tax/ltt/
37. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1), definition of “value of the consideration”, para
(f).
quarterlyreporting.html
bennettjones.com
Notes
38. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1), definition of “value of the consideration”, para 58. For a discussion of the changes to the De Minimis Regulation and their
(g). retroactive effect, see: Jane C. Helmstadter and Martin A.U. Sorensen,
“Ministry of Finance Ready to Party like it’s 1989: Retroactive Changes to
39. Ibid. Ontario Provincial Land Transfer Tax” (22 February 2016), Bennett Jones
Thought Network (blog), online: blog.bennettjones.com/2016/02/22/
40. See the following for details: Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Conveyances ministry-of-finance-ready-to-party-like-its-1989-retroactive-changes-to-
Involving Trusts”, Bulletin LTT 1-2005 (Published March 2005), online: ontario-provincial-land-transfer-tax/
www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/bulletins/ltt/1_2005.html
59. De Minimis Bulletin, supra note 13.
41. See the complete description for the text of the affidavit at: Ontario,
Ministry of Finance, “Guide to the Requirements to Evidence NIL Value of 60. Code, supra note 1, at 760-58.
Consideration for Conveyances Involving Trusts - Land Transfer Tax Act”,
(Published April 2004), online: www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/guides/ltt/0693.html. 61. Code, supra note 1, at 760-1.
42. Act, supra note 1, at s 5(7). 62. De Minimis Regulation, supra note 9 at s 1(3).
43. Woodbine Cachet West Inc. v. Ontario (Finance), 2007 ONCA 809. 63. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1).
44. Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Transactions for Nominal Consideration”, 64. Act, supra note 1, at s 2.1(2)
Bulletin LTT 10-2000 (Published November 2000), online: www.fin.gov.
on.ca/en/bulletins/ltt/10_2000.html 65. Ibid.
45. Unregistered Guide, supra note 24. 66. Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Non-Resident Speculation Tax”, (Published
April, 2017), online: https://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/bulletins/nrst/ [NRST
46. Unregistered Guide, supra note 24. Bulletin]
47. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(9). 67. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1) and Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC
2001 c 27 at s. 2(1).
48. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(11).
68. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1).
49. Unregistered Guide, supra note 24 at part 6.
69. Act, supra note 1, at s 1(1).
50. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(11).
70. See Tax Payable under Subsection 2(2.1) of the Act by Foreign Entities and
51. Act, supra note 1, at s 3(13.1); Contrast the current legislation with the Taxable Trustees, O Reg 182/17.
decision in 932292 Ontario Inc. v Ontario (Minister of Finance), 1997
Carswell Ont 2418, [1997] OJ No. 2276, 30 OTC 394 (affirmed at the Ontario 71. From a practitioner’s perspective, LawPro recommends reviewing and
Court of Appeal in 932292 Ontario Inc. v Ontario (Minister of Finance), making copies of original and independent source documents, such
1998 Carswell Ont 3578, 82 ACWS (3d) 813), where the court permitted as a passport, birth certificate, permanent resident card, or articles of
an affiliate deferral and tax cancellation using the nominee as the affiliate incorporation. Although it arose in a different context, the recent judgment
transferee through a registered transfer followed by a beneficial disposition. of the Tax Court in the case of Kau v The Queen, 2018 TCC 156, is instructive
This decision is arguably no longer relevant given the provisions of Section on this issue.
13.1 of the Act.
53. 2143569 Ontario Inc v. Ontario (Minister of Revenue), 2014 ONSC 4628, 242
ACWS (3d) 970, 44 RPR (5th) 285.
57. Exemptions From Tax Under Section 3 of the Act O Reg 70/91 as it appeared
on 17 February 2016 at s 1(2).
For more information on Bennett Jones’ Commercial Real Estate group services and lawyers, please visit
BennettJones.com/CommercialRealEstate
bennettjones.com
Ontario and Toronto Land Transfer Tax, December 2018
Bennett Jones is an internationally recognized Canadian law firm founded and focused on principles of professional
excellence, integrity, respect and independent thought. Our firm’s leadership position is reflected in the law we
practise, the groundbreaking work we do, the client relationships we have, and the quality of our people. In keeping
with this standard, our Commercial Real Estate group is known for their unsurpassed depth and breadth of practical
experience and litigation expertise.
For more information about the firm, please visit online at BennettJones.com
Disclaimer
Although the information contained in this report has been obtained from sources which Bennett Jones LLP
believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy. A significant portion of the information in this report has
been compiled from press releases and other publicly available disclosure documents of oil sands producers and
is subject to the same qualifications set forth therein. We caution that we are not qualified to verify, and have not
independently verified, the financial information presented herein. The information presented herein may have been
paraphrased or condensed.