Torts Assignment 3

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

TO: Professor

FROM: Barbara Brown

DATE: February 2, 2018

RE: Torts – Assignment 3

Jake, Alex and Ethan are teenagers out for a walk on Center Street when they spot a

bright and inviting Christmas display on the Smith’s property. Without meaning to

damage anything, they decide to walk across the lawn to get a closer look.

Unknown to them, there is a faulty electrical connection on one of the mini twinkle lights.

Mr. Smith had intended to repair the wiring, but he didn’t get around to it before

installing the display. In addition, there are a few groundhog holes on the front lawn that

Mr. Smith knows about but never worried about because he knows where each one is.

Jake steps right into a groundhog hole, twists his ankle and falls with a howl right into

the tree with the shorted wire, causing him to get a shock on his arm and shorting out all

the decorations on that circuit. Jake sues Mr. Smith.

1) For purposes of liability of land occupiers, what class of entrants is Jake

considered part of? What are the rights of this class of entrants?

Child trespasser; This duty of trespassers, the landowner owes a duty to undertake

actions to prevent bodily harm from happening to the trespasser. By the owners
knowing that the groundhog holes were their they had a duty to protect trespassers from

get hurt.

2) What special rule or doctrine could potentially lead to Mr. Smith’s liability to

Jake?

Landowner owes a duty not to undertake actions or allow artificial conditions that cause

a risk of death or serious bodily harm to the trespasser. Landowner don’t owe a duty to

trespasser, but they do when a known danger is detected to repair/fix any damage to

prevent danger to trespasser, which is the foreseeable trespasser. The Child trespasser

doctrine also indicates if these kids are under 18, they are teenagers; that a land owner

knows should know that children are likely to enter property, for that particular purpose;

the land owner has duty to protect/warn of the danger. The invitee is a person with

implied permission to enter parts of the property; which the land owner has a duty to

warn or protect the licensee from any latent dangers, the land owner has a reasonable

duty to when discover to prevent those dangers or adequately warn the invitee of the

danger; this duty extends to dangers that the land owner does actually know about,

posting warning sign is usually good enough. The licensees are the person with

permission and these trespassers didn’t have permission.

3) All things considered, do you think Mr. Smith will be liable? Why or why not?

Yes, because Mr. Smith was aware of the groundhog holes and neglected to fix the

damage to prevent any harm to trespassers. Any consistent trespasser on your property

the land owner owe a duty not to undertake actions or allow artificial conditions that

could cause a risk of death or serious bodily harm to the trespasser; if the land owner

know of danger and the need to repair condition on land he/she has a duty to
protect/warn of danger; there was a faulty electrical connection on one of the mini

twinkle lights. Mr. Smith had intended to repair the wiring, but he didn’t get around to it

before installing his display. There were a few groundhog holes on the front lawn that

Mr. Smith knew about but never worried about because he knew where each one was.

With this knowledge he had an obligation to prevent any danger to persons.

4) Mr. Smith wants to sue Jake for shorting out all the decorations and ruining the

circuit. For what tort would he do so? Trespassing, Will Jake be held liable? Yes, for the

damages he has done. Explain. Jakes was on his property without his permission and

did cause damage by shorting out all the decorations on the circuit.

You might also like