Ancient Letter, Modern Mystery: The "Secret Mark" Translation
Ancient Letter, Modern Mystery: The "Secret Mark" Translation
Ancient Letter, Modern Mystery: The "Secret Mark" Translation
Mark” Translation
TALKBACK Add Your Comment
Folio I From the letters of the most holy Clement, the author of the
Recto Stromateis. To Theodore.
You did well in silencing the unspeakable teachings of the
Carpocratians. For these are the “wandering stars” referred to in the
prophecy, who wander from the narrow road of the commandments
into a boundless abyss of the carnal and
5 bodily sins. | i For, priding themselves in knowledge, as they say, “of
the deep things of Satan,” they do not know that they are casting
themselves away into “the nether world of the darkness” of falsity,
and, boasting that they are free, they have become slaves of servile
desires. Such men are to be opposed in all ways and altogether. For,
even if they should say something true, one who loves the truth
should not, even so, agree with them. For not all true things are
10 the truth, nor should | that truth which merely seems true according
to human opinions be preferred to the true truth, that according to
the faith. Now of the things they keep saying about the divinely
inspired Gospel according to Mark, some are altogether falsifications,
and others, even if they do contain some true elements, nevertheless
are not reported truly. For the true things being mixed with
inventions, are falsified, so that, as the saying goes, even the
15 salt | loses its savor.
As for Mark, then, during Peter’s stay in Rome he wrote an account
of the Lord’s doings, not, however, declaring all of them, nor yet
hinting at the secret ones, but selecting what he thought most useful
for increasing the faith of those who were being instructed. But when
Peter died a martyr, Mark came over to
20 Alexandria, bringing both his own notes and those of Peter, | from
which he transferred to his former book the things suitable to
whatever makes for progress toward knowledge. Thus he composed
a more spiritual Gospel for the use of those who were being
perfected. Nevertheless, he yet did not divulge the things not to be
uttered, nor did he write down the hierophantic teaching of the Lord,
but
25 to the stories already written he added yet others and, moreover,
brought in certain | sayings of which he knew the interpretation
would, as a mystagogue, lead the hearers into the innermost
sanctuary of that truth hidden by seven veils. Thus, in sum, he
prepared matters, neither grudgingly nor incautiously, in my
I verso opinion, and, dying, he left his composition to the church in |
Alexandria, where it even yet is most carefully guarded, being read
only to those who are being initiated into the great mysteries.
But since the foul demons are always devising destruction for the
race of men,
5 Carpocrates, instructed by them and using deceitful arts, | so
enslaved a certain presbyter of the church in Alexandria that he got
from him a copy of the secret Gospel, which he both interpreted
according to his blasphemous and carnal doctrine and, moreover,
polluted, mixing with the spotless and holy words
10 utterly shameless lies. From this mixture is drawn off | the teaching
of the Carpocratians. To them, therefore, as I said above, one must
never give way; nor, when they put forward their falsifications,
should one concede that the secret Gospel is by Mark, but should
even deny it on oath. For, “Not all true things are to be said to all
men.” For this reason the Wisdom of God, through Solomon, advises,
15 “Answer the fool from his folly,” | teaching that the light of the truth
should be hidden from those who are mentally blind. Again it says,
“From him who has not shall be taken away,” and, “Let the fool walk
in darkness.” But we are “children of light,” having been illuminated
by “the dayspring” of the spirit of the Lord “from on high,” and
“Where the Spirit of the Lord is,” it says, “there is liberty,” for “All
things are pure to the pure.”
20 To you, therefore, I shall not hesitate to answer the questions you
have asked, | refuting the falsifications by the very words of the
Gospel. For example, after “And they were in the road going up to
Jerusalem,” and what follows, until “After three days he shall arise,”
the secret Gospel brings the following material word for word: “And
they come into Bethany. And a certain woman whose brother had
died was there. And, coming, she prostrated herself before Jesus
25 and says to him, ‘Son of David, | have mercy on me.’ But the
disciples rebuked her. And Jesus, being angered, went off with her
into the garden where
2 recto the tomb was, and | straightway a great cry was heard from the
tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of
the tomb. And straightway, going in where the youth was, he
stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the
youth, looking upon him, loved him and | began to beseech
5 him that he might be with him. And going out of the tomb they came
into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days Jesus
told him what to do and in the evening the youth comes to him,
wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him
that night, for | Jesus taught him the mystery of
10 the kingdom of God. And thence, arising, he returned to the other
side of the Jordan.” After these words follows the text, “And James
and John come to him,” and all that section. But “naked man with
naked man,” and the other things about which you wrote, are not
found. And after the words, “And he comes into Jericho,” the secret
Gospel adds only,
15 And | the sister of the youth whom Jesus loved and his mother and
Salome were there, and Jesus did not receive them.” But the many
other things about which you wrote both seem to be and are
falsifications. Now the true explanation and that which accords with
the true philosophy