4937442
4937442
4937442
CHULEEPORN LAEIDDEE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Chuleeporn Laeiddee
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to find out if a re-order point model can
improve the efficiency of drug inventory management at Ramathibodi Hospital by
using inventory performance data from the fiscal year 2006. Three case study drugs
were used in this research: Eprex Prefilled Syringe 4000 U injection, Metformin 500
mg tablets, and Vitamin B Complex tablets. The criteria for drug selection were cost,
storage space, and delivery time. The research procedure was divided into three parts.
First, we analyzed activity and cost of drug purchasing and inventory management,
Second, we defined the appropriate re-order point and order up to level by the (s,S)
inventory control model. Lastly, we compared the inventory performance indicators
of the drug inventory management base with the (s,S) model and existing method.
The results revealed that drug purchasing and inventory management has
6 activities: purchasing, dispensing, receiving, stock level checking, expensive and
narcotic drug checking, and nearly expired drug checking. The average purchasing
cost was 59.89 Baht per purchasing order. The carrying charge of drugs stored in a
refrigerator and drugs stored at room temperature was 1.25% and 1.20% of the
average inventory value, respectively. The inventory performance indicators based on
the (s,S) model had a lower average inventory value, higher inventory turnover rate,
and lower cost than the existing system.
The study concludes that if the (s,S) model was implemented, the
efficiency of drug inventory management would increase. The study results provide
basic information for pharmacist administrators to develop processes for drug
purchasing and inventory management in hospitals. In addition, there was not
constant optimal purchasing nor an inventory management model for all hospitals,
but that may depend on the size of the hospital, work environment, whether or not it
is a private or public hospital, and the purchasing and inventory management policy
of each hospital. So, implementation of this model should be considered.
82 pages
การพัฒนาจุดสั่งซื้อใหม่ในการบริหารยาคงคลังโรงพยาบาลรามาธิบดี
IMPROVEMENT OF RE-ORDER POINT FOR DRUG INVENTORY MANAGEMENT AT
RAMATHIBODI HOSPITAL
ภ.ม. (บริหารเภสัชกิจ)
บทคัดย่อ
งานวิจัยนี้มีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อศึกษาวิเคราะห์รูปแบบการควบคุมสินค้าคงคลังด้านการกาหนดจุด
สั่งซื้อใหม่ที่เหมาะสมเพื่อเพิ่มประสิทธิภาพการบริหารจัดการคลังยาของโรงพยาบาลามาธิบดี ในปีงบประมาณ
2549 โดยคัดเลือกยา 3 รายการเป็นกรณีศึกษา ได้แก่ Eprex Prefilled Syring 4000 U injection, Metformin 500
mg tablet และ Vitamin B Complex tablet การเลือกยาที่ใช้ในการศึกษาจะแบ่งตามปัญหาการจัดการสินค้าคงคลัง
รูปแบบการควบคุมสินค้าคงคลังแบบ (s,S) ได้ถูกนามาใช้ในกาพัฒนาการจัดการสินค้าคงคลัง ขั้นตอนการศึกษา
แบ่งเป็น 3 ส่วนคือ ขั้นตอนแรกทาการวิเคราะห์กิจกรรมและต้นทุนในการจัดซื้อยาและการบริหารจัดการคลังยา
ขั้นตอนที่สอง กาหนดจุดสั่งซื้อใหม่ และระดับที่สั่งซื้อภายใต้รูปแบบ (s,S) ขั้นตอนสุดท้าย เปรียบเทียบตัวชี้วัด
ระสิทธิภาพการจัดการสินค้าคงคลังของรูปแบบ (s,S) และรูปแบบเดิม
ผลการศึกษาพบว่า งานจัดซื้อยาและจัดการสินค้าคงคลังประกอบด้วย 6 กิจกรรม ต้นทุนในการ
จัดซื้อยาต่อใบสั่งซื้อคือ 59.89 บาท และต้นทุนการเก็บรักษายาที่ต้องเก็บในตู้เย็นและยาที่เก็บในอุณหภูมิปกติต่อ
มูลค่ายาคงคลังเฉลี่ยเท่ากับร้อยละ 1.25 และ 1.20 ตามลาดับ จากการเปรียบเทียบตัวชี้วัดประสิทธิภาพการจัดการ
สินค้าคงคลังตามรูปแบบ (s,S) พบว่ามูลค่ายาคงคลังเฉลี่ยลดลง อัตราการหมุนเวียนยาเพิ่มขึ้น และต้นทุนต่ากว่า
รูปแบบเดิมที่ใช้อยู่ในปัจจุบัน
จากการศึกษานี้สรุปได้ว่า ถ้านารูปแบบ (s,S) มาใช้ในการบริหารยาคงคลังในโรงพยาบาล จะ
ทาให้ประสิทธิภาพในการบริหารจัดการคลังยาดีขึ้น และผลที่ได้จากการศึกษานี้สามารถนาไปใช้เป็นข้อมูล
พื้นฐานสาหรับเภสัชกรในการพัฒนาระบบการจัดซื้อและจัดการสินค้าคงคลังในโรงพยาบาลให้ดียิ่งขึ้น อย่างไร
ก็ตาม ยังไม่มีรูปแบบการสั่งซื้อที่เหมาะสมสาหรับทุกโรงพยาบาลเนื่องจากขึ้นอยู่กับ ขนาดโรงพยาบาล ปัจจัย
สิ่งแวดล้อมขั้นพื้นฐาน , โรงพยาบาลรัฐบาลหรือเอกชน และนโยบายในการสั่งซื้อและการบริหารจัดการคลัง
ดังนั้นการนารูปแบบมาใช้ในการบริหารยาคงคลังในโรงพยาบาลจาเป็นต้องคานึงถึงปัจจัยเหล่านี้เป็นสาคัญ
82 หน้า
CONTENTS
Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
ABSTRACT (ENGLISH) iv
ABSTRACT (THAI) v
LIST OF TABLES viii
LIST OF FIGURES ix
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
Research question 2
General objective 2
Specific objectives 2
Expected outcomes and benefits 3
Definition of terms 3
Conceptual framework 4
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 6
Inventory management 6
Inventory control model 13
Activity-Based Costing (ABC) 21
Rationale on selecting the study site 24
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY 25
Study design 25
Study site 25
Study period 25
Drug selection criteria 25
Study procedure 27
CHAPTER IV RESULTS 32
Activity analysis 32
Cost analysis 34
CONTENTS (cont.)
Page
Inventory model 42
Inventory performance 51
Summary of major finding 56
CHAPTER V DISCUSSION 58
Activity analysis 58
Cost analysis 59
Inventory model 61
Inventory performance 61
Limitation of this study 64
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65
Conclusion 65
Recommendations 66
REFERENCES 67
APPENDIX 71
BIOGRAPHY 82
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Number and value of monthly drugs dispensing from inventory during 26
fiscal year 2006
2. Activity dictionary of drug purchasing and inventory management 33
process
3. Total cost and activity cost of drug purchasing 35
4. Total cost of drug inventory management 37
5. Activity cost of drug inventory management 40
6. Activity cost per unit of drug purchasing and inventory management 41
7. Comparing MSE of Eprex between forecasting methods 43
8. Comparing MSE of Metformin between forecasting methods 46
9. Comparing MSE of Vitamin B Complex between forecasting methods 49
10. Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing 52
system and (s,S) model of Eprex
11. Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing 53
system and (s,S) model of Eprex
12. Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing 54
system and (s,S) model of Metformin
13. Comparing inventory performance between the existing system and 54
(s,S) model of Metformin
14. Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing 55
system and (s,S) model of Vitamin B Complex
15. Comparing inventory performance between the existing system and 56
(s,S) model of Vitamin B Complex
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Conceptual framework of this study 5
2. Carrying cost is linearly related to order size 14
3. Ordering cost is inversely and nonlinearly related to order size 14
4. The total-cost curve is U-shaped 14
5. Order point, Order quantity (s,Q) system 16
6. Order point, Order up to level (s,S) system 17
7. Periodic review, Order up to level (R,S) system 18
8. The existing system inventory situation of Eprex 42
9. Forecasting demand of Eprex and actual demand in fiscal year 2006 44
10. The (s,S) model inventory simulation of Eprex 45
11. The existing system inventory situation of Metformin 45
12. Forecasting demand of Metformin and actual demand in fiscal year 47
2006
13. The (s,S) model inventory simulation of Metformin 48
14. The existing system inventory situation of Vitamin B Complex 48
15. Forecasting demand of Vitamin B Complex and actual demand in fiscal year 50
2006
16. The (s,S) model inventory simulation of Vitamin B Complex 51
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The health care service grew over the past few years and the total world
spent 4.7 trillion U.S. dollars on health in 2005. At the same time, Thailand’s total
expenditure on health as percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was 3.5(1).
Many health care organizations are expected to grow in the next few years. Hospitals
are complex organizations providing a multitude of services to patients, physicians,
and staff. These services include dietary, linen, housekeeping, pharmacy, laboratory,
surgery, administration, and others. Each area has specific and often unique material
and supply need, creating a requirement in these facilities for supply management
system that can provide the necessary supplies when need. In the current climate of
increasing health care costs, systems inventory must be optimized without sacrificing
the level of service provided.
As a percentage of GDP, Thailand’s health expenditure rose from 5.43%
in 1995 to 6.14% in 2005, the growth rising at the rate faster than that for GDP. Most
of health spending was on curative care as evidenced by the fact that the proportion of
pharmaceutical spending rose to 42.8% of overall health spending in 2005(2). Since
drug is the important factor in curative care, study on cost containment of general
hospitals revealed that hospital pharmacy department had the highest proportion
between 25% to 27% of the total cost in hospital(3). In 1995 the value of hospital drug
inventory of nationwide under the Ministry of Public Health was 1,779.5 million Baht
and it was forecasted to exceed 2,121 million by 2004(4).
In an attempt to decrease the amount of hospital drug inventory, the
Ministry of Public Health has continually striven to develop the efficiency of drug
inventory management system. Reduction of drug inventory level will eventually
lower the carrying cost, but causes the purchasing frequency to arise, which in turn,
purchasing cost will increase by the number of purchasing time. And when drug
inventory decreases, there will be more chances of drug to be out-of-stock. In this
case, the responsible person will urgently procure those shortage drug items, thus, it
may cause some problem in the service system. In order to manage the various types
of inventory, attributes of items first must be analyzed in term of cost, lead time, past
usage, and the nature of demand (5). In many purchasing situations, there are number
of different considerations conflicting with one another that influence the final
purchasing decision. Improvement of drug inventory management can significantly
decrease the expenditure in great amount.
This research is begins to study with focus on order quantity and re-order
point of drug purchasing in hospital. The purpose of this study is to find out the re-
order point model can improve the efficiency of drug inventory management at
Ramathibodi Hospital by employing inventory performance indicators. The
information of drug purchasing would be beneficial for pharmacist administrators to
develop drug inventory management system.
Research question
Will the re-order point model improve the efficiency of drug inventory
management?
Objectives
General objective
The purpose of this study is to find out if re-order point model can
improve the efficiency of drug inventory management at Ramathibodi Hospital by
employing inventory performance data during the fiscal year 2006.
Specific objectives
1. Assess the activities of drug purchasing and inventory management at
Pharmacy department, Ramathibodi Hospital during the fiscal year 2006.
2. Apply the re-order point model to calculate new re-order point, order
quantities and simulate the new drug inventory processes.
3. Compare the inventory performance indicators of drug inventory
management base on the re-order point model and existing method.
Definition of terms
Inventory
The total stock kept on hand at any storage point to protect against
uncertainty, permit bulk purchasing, minimize waiting time, increase transportation
efficiency and buffer against seasonal fluctuations.
Inventory management
The branch of business management concerned with planning and
controlling inventories.
Drug expenditure
Money spends for purchasing drug to dispense that occur in the hospital.
Safety stock
The buffer, cushion, or reserve stock keep on hand to protect against stock
outs caused by delayed deliveries or markedly increased demand.
Service level
The percentage of items requested that are supplied, in the quantity
requested, by pharmacy inventory.
Stock out
Complete absence of an item that is normally expected to be on hand.
Re-order Point
The inventory level set to trigger an order of a specific item.
Conceptual framework
In this study, the researcher is to find out if new inventory model can
improve the efficiency of drug inventory management at Ramathibodi Hospital by
employing inventory performance data during the fiscal year 2006. We conducted in 2
systems of the inventory management, which are the existing system and re-order
point model (s,S) model. The inventory performance is indicated by three parameters.
When the inventory performances of those 2 systems were done, the comparison
between 2 systems will be present. The conceptual framework of this study is shown
in Figure 1.
Problem
Problem
·· Regulation
Regulation
·· Cost
Cost
·· Storage
Storagespace
space
Inventory
Inventory
on
onhand
hand
Order
Orderup
uptotolevel
level Carrying
Carrying
Minimum
Minimum Inventory (S)
(S)
Monthly
Monthly Order
Order InventoryPerformance
Performance cost
cost
inventory
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ.
Lead
Leadtime
time
Reorder
Reorderpoint
point(s)
(s)
(s,S)
(s,S)model
model
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Inventory management
The American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS) define
inventory management as the branch of business management concerned with
planning and controlling inventories(6). The role of inventory management is to
maintain a desired stock level of specific products or items. The systems that plan and
control inventory must be based on the product, the customer, and the process that
makes the product available (7).
4. They come from the information of potential hospital that can record
the correct and reliable data. They can analyze and conduct information to use. They
are not the burden to collect and analyze.
5. They consist of the sets that cover structural, process, and outcome
indicators of health service and medical therapy. They are used for considering overall
hospital quality improvement.
$4,023,409. This was a 15% increase from the average of $3,485,492 reported in
1996/97. Reported total purchases ranged from $312,056 to $30,349,416, total beds
from 102 to 1999 and total patient days from 11,507 to 675,965. The data therefore
represents responses from hospitals with a broad range of services, programs and
specialties. The information and data presented here attempts to bring order to the
numbers that are representative of the diversity of respondents’ hospitals. They
provide valuable insight into trends and averages and allow readers to track changes in
their own facilities and make rough comparisons to national averages. They allow
readers to determine if their facility is keeping pace and offers some insight as to why
the changes are occurring.
Suchonwanich N. studied the inventory management at Mahasarakam
hospital in the fiscal year 1996 (17). Inventory values in the fiscal year 1996 were
10,093,483 Baht. The safety stocks of essential drug (3-6 months) were higher than the
safety stocks of non-essential drug (2-4 months). The essential drug values were
6,470,343.60 Baht, the non-essential drug values were 3,623,139.66 Baht. She
explained why safety stocks of non-essential drug were less than essential drug.
Because of the out- of-date hospital drug list, then the doctor turn to order more non-
essential drug. If this trend has continued, the hospital would face the over drug stock.
Kattiviriyaoinyo K. studied about assessment of drug procurement system
of private hospitals in 1998 (18). The study was conducted in two parts. In first part,
procurement procedures, all 422 private hospitals and clinics with beds for admission
in Thailand were surveyed by mailed questionnaire. In the second part, procurement
costs were collected using cost collecting from at two Bangkok and vicinity private
hospitals. The results of first part revealed that the larger hospitals and hospitals in the
Hospital Accreditation (HA) project had high percentages of good procurement
practices. The hospital with good procurement practices would have good
procurement outcomes. For the second part, labor cost was the largest proportion of
both purchasing and inventory carrying cost. In the larger hospital, the unit cost of
purchasing and inventory carrying cost were less. There were not constant optimal
procurement costs for all hospitals, but that they depended on the hospital’s
management.
TC = A / Q CP Q / 2 C H [1]
Where
A = Annual requirement
Q = Order size
CP = Cost of an order
CH = Unit inventory cost per year
To derive the minimum-cost lot size (EOQ), take the first derivative with
respect to Q and set it equal to zero. The calculus is used to determine the point of
inflection on the total cost curve where it is no longer decreasing and beginning to
increase.
TC A C
= CP + H = 0 [2]
Q Q 2
2
EOQ = 2 AC P / C H [3]
4. (R,s,S) system
This is combination of (s,S) and (R,S) systems. The idea is that every
review interval units of time to check the inventory position. If it is at or below the
reorder point s and order enough to raise it to the order up to level S. If the position is
above the reorder point, nothing is done until at least the next review instant.
traditional Maximum-Minimum system. The result shows that within a year time-
frame, the cost of inventory control can decrease by more than 10,000 US Dollars.
Chanchai C. studied costs of drug inventory management and drug
inventory performance at Khon Kaen Hospital in the fiscal year 2000, and then
compared the existing system with a simulated model using ABC classification and
Economic Order Quantity model (ABC/EOQ system) (24). The findings showed a
total inventory management cost of 3.34 million Baht, which was divided into
purchasing cost of 1.54 million Baht and carrying cost of 1.80 million Baht. The
inventory carrying fraction was 15.18 % and the purchasing cost was 421.38 Baht per
item. The inventory performance was indicated as inventory turnover of 7.9, a service
level of 81.3%, and expense ratio of 3.6%. When the service level was increased from
81.3 % of the existing system to 95 % of ABC/EOQ system, the inventory
management cost did not change. The costs of inventory management and inventory
performance derived from a simulated model (ABC/EOQ) were compared with those
of the existing system. For category A drugs, when the service level was adjusted from
82.75% to 95%, the cost of drug inventory management did not change. For category
B drugs, when the service level was adjusted from 83.73% to 95%, the cost of drug
inventory management increased by 15.19 %. For category C drugs, when the service
level was adjusted from 75.5% to 95%, the cost of drug inventory management
decreased by 13.84 %. The feasibility of implementing the ABC/EOQ system in real
practice was determined by the Delphi technique. It is possible to implement the
ABC/EOQ system in hospitals.
Jie Yang et al. considered an inventory control problem with multiple-
period replenishment lead time and nonstationary stochastic demand, and provided an
optimal policy for this kind of problem (25). This paper compared the expected total
costs performance of a nonstationary (s, S) policy with Sox’s method and Tarim and
Kingsman’s method. The expected total cost for this policy was lower than Sox’s
policy. And the expected total cost Tarim and Kingsman’s method was 2418.1, while
for this policy it was only 2179.2, which saves 9.88% total costs. This policy can
adjust both replenishment period and order quantity based on demand realization and
thus save cost.
- Customers
7. Calculation of product cost
Products cost is determined through a bill of activities that itemizes the
activities and quantity of each activity.
ABC method is applicable to accurately the cost, detected inefficient activities and
allowed to optimized costs in heart transplant process.
Methacanon, T. analyzed the activity cost of the pharmacy dispensing
service in the outpatient unit in Ladyao Hospital, Nakhonsawan Province, Thailand
(34). Research used an activity-based approach in the fiscal year 2005. The results
revealed that there were 18 activities of the outpatient pharmacy dispensing service in
Ladyao Hospital. The total cost was 12,223,331.27 Baht which was composed of
recurrent costs (96.46%) and capital costs (3.54%). The largest proportion of recurrent
cost was cost of drugs and medical supplies. Unit cost of dispensing service was 85.85
Baht/prescription or 19.10 Baht/drug item. If the cost of drugs and medical supplies
was excluded, unit cost was 11.76 Baht/prescription or 2.62 Baht/drug item.
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
1. Study design
This study was an analytical cross-sectional study.
2. Study site
This study was conducted at the drug purchasing and drug inventory
control unit of the pharmacy department, Ramathibodi Hospital.
3. Study period
The process activities of drug purchasing and inventory management were
collected from December 2007 to February 2008. Data during fiscal year 2006 were
collected for calculation new re-order point and order quantity.
Table 1 Number and value of monthly drugs dispensing from inventory during fiscal
year 2006.
Eprex Metformin Vit. B Cpx.
Date
(syringe) (tablet) (tablet)
Oct-05 894 347,500 130,000
Nov-05 1,380 438,000 180,000
Dec-05 846 437,500 221,000
Jan-06 1,254 377,500 192,000
Feb-06 780 438,500 111,000
Mar-06 1,640 438,500 162,000
Apr-06 960 334,000 170,000
May-06 1,560 437,000 121,000
Jun-06 1,140 585,000 304,000
Jul-06 1,500 347,000 86,000
Aug-06 1,380 437,000 224,000
Sep-06 1,026 481,500 90,000
Oct-06 1,314 384,500 200,000
Nov-06 1,158 559,000 119,000
Dec-06 1,176 453,000 240,000
Total (unit) 18,008 6,495,500 2,550,000
Total value (Baht) 32,630,496 6,495,500 1,275,000
5. Study procedure
This study procedure was divided into 4 phases; 1) Activity analysis,
2) Cost analysis, 3) Inventory model and 4) Inventory performance.
calculated by multiplying the electric power with working time used and was
computed by using government non-profit rate. The telephone cost allocated to
purchasing unit and drug inventory control unit by the number of personnel. The
electricity and telephone costs were allocated to activities by proportion of working
time and proportion of telephone used in each activity, respectively.
3. Capital cost
- Capital cost included depreciation value of buildings and long-lasting
equipments. The data collected from central supply unit. Useful life of buildings and
equipments criteria based on central supply unit. Cost accounting system was used to
calculate the depreciation cost based on straight-line method under the following
formula:
Carrying charge, the cost in one Baht of carrying one Baht of inventory for
one year.
Where
= Actual value - forecast value
= number of data
Drugs dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006 was forecasted from
number of drug dispensing per week in fiscal year 2005.
3. Data forecasting was used to calculate Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
following formula (20):
Where
Where
- When inventory position lower than reorder point, order quantity are
equal to Economic Order Quantity plus the difference between inventory position and
reorder point.
The actual order quantity is round number to packing size.
The data in this study were analyzed by using the Microsoft Excel 2003,
XLSTAT 2008 and SPSS software version 16.
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
The results of this study were divided into three parts as follows:
Part1. Activity analysis
Part2. Cost analysis
Part3. Inventory model
Part3. Inventory performance
Nearly expired drug Check drug expiration date and record in report
checking
record with print document for committee 43,221.66 2.13 33,456.55 8.84 3,394.45 2.13 80,072.66 3.12
2. Check drug and record data in receiving
book by committee 185,670.52 9.15 30,410.41 8.04 14,581.78 9.15 230,662.71 8.99
3. Check drug by inventory staff 172,683.73 8.51 28,283.34 7.48 13,561.86 8.51 214,528.93 8.36
4. Place drugs on shelf 72,036.10 3.55 11,798.57 3.12 5,657.41 3.55 89,492.09 3.49
Drug
5. Record data in stock card 28,814.44 1.42 4,918.18 1.30 2,262.97 1.42 35,995.59 1.40
receiving
6. Record data in computer, print report
and transfer data to purchasing unit 14,407.22 0.71 4,008.33 1.06 1,131.48 0.71 19,547.03 0.76
7. Check and arrange drug receiving
document 21,509.37 1.06 5,720.96 1.51 1,689.26 1.06 28,919.58 1.13
8. Sign drug receiving document by chief
of inventory control unit 5,681.72 0.28 930.59 0.25 446.22 0.28 7,058.53 0.27
Results / 38
compare with report 30,234.87 1.49 4,952.08 1.31 2,374.52 1.49 37,561.47 1.46
1. Print out inventory level
Expensive and report 405.84 0.02 1,385.36 0.37 31.87 0.02 1,823.07 0.07
narcotic drug 2. Check drug quantity in
checking stock card compare with
report 1,623.35 0.08 265.88 0.07 127.49 0.08 2,016.72 0.08
Nearly expired Check drug expiration date
drug checking and record in report 129,664.99 6.39 26,951.42 7.12 10,183.34 6.39 166,799.75 6.50
Total 2,029,186.00 100.00 378,301.76 100.00 159,363.76 100.00 2,566,851.52 100.00
M.Sc. in Pharm. (Pharmacy Administration)
Results // 39
42
Drug inventory dispensing 1,323,029.27 65.20 224,527.40 59.35 103,905.17 65.20 1,651,461.84 64.34
Chuleeporn Laeiddee
Drug receiving 544,024.77 26.81 119,526.93 31.60 42,725.42 26.81 706,277.12 27.52
Stock level checking 30,437.79 1.50 5,644.76 1.49 2,390.46 1.50 38,473.01 1.50
Expensive and narcotic drug checking 2,029.19 0.10 1,651.25 0.44 159.36 0.10 3,839.80 0.15
Nearly expired drug checking 129,664.99 6.39 26,951.42 7.12 10,183.34 6.39 166,799.75 6.50
Table6 Activity cost per unit of drug purchasing and inventory management.
Total cost Unit cost
Activities Amount Output
(Baht) (Baht)
1. Drug purchasing 821,692.90 13,720 Purchasing order 59.89
2. Drug inventory
1,651,461.84 18,569 Requisition order 88.94
dispensing
3. Drug receiving 706,277.12 13,720 Invoice 51.48
4. Stock level checking 38,473.01 4 Time 9,618.25
5. Expensive and
3,839.80 1,440 Drug item 2.67
narcotic drug checking
6. Nearly expired drug
166,799.75 132 report 1,263.63
checking
1. Distribution test
Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test for number of Eprex dispensing
per week during fiscal year 2005-2007 were used. The null hypothesis was that the
number of Eprex dispensing was similar to the normal distribution. A statistical
significance level set at 0.05. The statistical significance was 0.2000 that greater than
0.05. So the number of Eprex dispensing was normal distribution.
2. Forecasting
The forecast method that yielded the least Mean Square Error (MSE) was
selected. The comparing MSE between forecasting methods was presented in Table7.
From Table7, the best forecasting method for forecast the number of Eprex
dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006 was simple exponential smoothing method.
The value Mean Square Error (MSE) was 8,267.43.
Number of Eprex dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006 was forecasted
from number of Eprex dispensing per week in fiscal year 2005 by using simple
exponential smoothing method. Figure9 presents forecasting demand of Eprex and
actual demand in fiscal year 2006. The MSE was 6,906.97.
Figure9 Forecasting demand of Eprex and actual demand in fiscal year 2006
1. Distribution test
Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test for number of Metformin
dispensing per week during fiscal year 2005-2007 were used. The null hypothesis was
that the number of Metformin dispensing was similar to the normal distribution.The
statistical significance of normality test was 0.0539 that greater than 0.05 so number of
Metformin dispensing was normal distribution.
2. Forecasting
The forecast method that yielded the least Mean Square Error (MSE) was
selected. The comparing MSE between forecasting methods was presented in Table8.
From Table8, the best forecasting method for forecast the number of
Metformin dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006 was Holt’s linear trend method.
The value Mean Square Error (MSE) was 172,438,983.73.
Number of Metformin dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006 was
forecasted from number of Metformin dispensing per week in fiscal year 2005 by
using Holt’s linear trend method. Figure12 presents forecasting demand of Metformin
and actual demand in fiscal year 2006. The MSE was 393,281,729.22.
Figure12 Forecasting demand of Metformin and actual demand in fiscal year 2006
1. Distribution test
Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test for distribution was used. The
null hypothesis was that the number of Vitamin B complex dispensing was similar to
the normal distribution. The statistical significance of normality test was 0.0001 that
less than 0.05 so number of Vitamin B Complex dispensing was non-normal
distribution. Thus, other distributions consider to fitting the data. The weibull
distribution befitted data: the statistical significance was 0.26241 that greater than
0.05.
2. Forecasting
The forecast method that yielded the least Mean Square Error (MSE) was
selected. The comparing MSE between forecasting methods was presented in Table9.
From Table9, the best forecasting method for forecast the number of
Vitamin B Complex dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006 was Brown’s linear trend
method. The value Mean Square Error (MSE) was 24,544,837.09.
Number of Vitamin B Complex dispensing per week in fiscal year 2006
was forecasted from number of Vitamin B Complex dispensing per week in fiscal year
2005 by using Brown’s linear trend method. Figure15 presents forecasting demand of
Vitamin B Complex and actual demand in fiscal year 2006. The MSE was
54,961,688.22.
Figure15 Forecasting demand of Vitamin B Complex and actual demand in fiscal year 2006
syringes. Thus, the average inventory value was 1,053,953.52 Baht. For comparison of
the average inventory value between 2 system, the (s,S) model decreased average
inventory values was 958,071.42 Baht (47.62 %).
2. Inventory turnover
In the fiscal year 2006, Pharmacy department provided Eprex Prefilled
Syringe 4000 U injection at total annual value was 25,512,960.00 Baht. The average
inventory values base on existing system and (s,S) model from above. Thus, the
inventory turnover increased from 12.68 to 24.21 (90.90%).
3. Inventory costs
The existing system; the total drug inventory management costs of Eprex
Prefilled Syringe 4000 U injection in fiscal year 2006 were 25,796.30 Baht. These
included 718.68 Baht for purchasing cost and 25,077.62 Baht for carrying cost. The
(s,S) model; the total drug inventory management costs of Eprex Prefilled Syringe
4000 U injection tablet in fiscal year 2006 were 15,711.62 Baht. These included
2,575.28 Baht for purchasing cost and 13,136.34 Baht for carrying cost (Table 10).
Table10 Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing system
and (s,S) model of Eprex
Existing system (s,S) model
Cost (Baht) (Baht)
Purchasing cost 718.68 2,575.28
Carrying cost 25,077.62 13,136.34
Total inventory cost 25,796.30 15,711.62
The existing system incurred the purchasing cost lower than the (s,S)
model. In the opposite, (s,S) model had the carrying cost and the total costs of drug
inventory management lower than the existing system. Thus, the total costs of drug
inventory management were decrease 39.09%.
The result of comparing inventory performance between the existing
system and (s,S) model of Eprex Prefilled Syringe 4000 U injection was presented in
Table11
Table11 Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing system
and (s,S) model of Eprex
Difference
Performance indicator Existing system (s,S) model
(%)
Average inventory values
(Baht) 2,012,024.94 1,053,953.52 - 47.62
Inventory turnover 12.68 24.21 +90.90
Inventory cost (Baht) 25,796.30 15,711.62 -39.09
Table12 Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing system
and (s,S) model of Metformin
Existing system (s,S) model
Cost (Baht) (Baht)
Purchasing cost 1,018.13 1,257.69
Carrying cost 3,560.65 2,584.74
Total inventory cost 4,578.79 3,842.43
The existing system incurred the purchasing cost lower than the (s,S)
model. In the opposite, (s,S) model had the carrying cost and the total costs of drug
inventory management lower than the existing system Thus, the total costs of drug
inventory management were decrease 16.08 %.
The result of comparing inventory performance between the existing
system and (s,S) model of provided Metformin 500 mg tablet was presented in
Table13
Table13 Comparing inventory performance between the existing system and (s,S)
model of Metformin
Difference
Performance indicator Existing system (s,S) model
(%)
Average inventory values
(Baht) 297,591.78 216,027.10 -27.41
Inventory turnover 16.94 23.34 +37.76
Inventory cost (Baht) 4,578.79 3,842.43 -16.08
For comparison of the average inventory value between 2 system, the (s,S) model
decreased average inventory values was 66,008.47 Baht (57.05%).
2. Inventory turnover
In the fiscal year, Pharmacy department provided Vitamin B Complex
tablet at total annual value was 599,461.20 Baht. The average inventory values base on
existing system and (s,S) model from above. Thus the inventory turnover increased
from 5.18 to 12.06 (132.84 %).
3. Inventory cost
The existing system; the total drug inventory management costs of
Vitamin B Complex in fiscal year 2006 were 1,743.66 Baht. These included 359.34
Baht for purchasing cost and 1,384.32 Baht for carrying cost. The (s,S) model; total
drug inventory management costs of Vitamin B Complex in fiscal year 2006 were
1,073.66 Baht. These included 479.12 Baht for purchasing cost and 594.54 Baht for
carrying cost (Table 14).
Table 14 Comparing purchasing cost and carrying cost between the existing system
and (s,S) model of Vitamin B Complex
The existing system incurred the purchasing cost lower than the (s,S)
model. In the opposite, (s,S) model had the carrying cost and the total costs of drug
inventory management lower than the existing system. Thus, total drug inventory
management costs of Vitamin B Complex were decrease 38.43 %.
Table15 Comparing inventory performance between the existing system and (s,S)
model of Vitamin B Complex
Difference
Performance indicator Existing system (s,S) model
(%)
Average inventory values
(Baht) 115,698.63 49,690.15 -57.05
Inventory turnover 5.18 12.06 +132.84
Inventory cost (Baht) 1,743.66 1,073.66 -38.43
CHAPTER V
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study is to find out if re-order point model can
improve the efficiency of drug inventory management at Ramathibodi Hospital. The
re-order point model used in this study is (s,S) model.
The discussion presented in five parts as follows:
Part 1 Activity analysis
Part 2 Cost analysis
Part 3 Inventory model
Part 4 Inventory performance
Part 5 Limitation of this study
under supervised by the Ministry of Public Health used the same present regulation in
purchasing but methods and details of purchasing may be different. It happened
because of the different explanations. In some hospitals, executives created their own
systems to support regulation on procurement. This made the details of purchasing
was different.
The inventory management process comprises 5 activities following; drug
inventory dispensing, drug receiving, stock level checking, expensive and narcotic
drug checking, and nearly expired drug checking. Drug inventory dispensing activity
and drug receiving activity are main activities because of both activities are daily
routine. The average time spent of inventory dispensing activity and drug receiving
activity was 65.20% and 26.81% of total working time, respectively. The functional
flow diagrams of both activities were showed that the data of drug dispensing and
receiving was recorded in both stock card and computer. They were redundant work
that needed for considering. The activity time spent of drug purchasing and inventory
unit was the same way of the survey inventory activity time among public and private
hospitals (38). It found that they had spent the most time for receiving drug, ordering
drug, drug requisitioned order and checking inventory.
study, the purchasing cost analysis in the process of purchasing would assume that
cost of each method was equal.
Total cost of drug inventory management was 2,566,851.52 Baht. The
labor cost became as the largest portion was 79.05% of total cost. The drug inventory
dispensing activity cost was the highest (1,651,461.84 Baht), which accounted for
64.34% of total cost. The record data in stock card sub activity cost was the highest
(728,061.18 Baht), which accounted for 28.36% of total cost. The drug inventory
dispensing was the highest activity cost from the most staff and time to perform this
activity. The record data in stock card activity; staffs that responsible on each drug
were count and record quantities of drug remain in inventory after drug dispensing and
receiving. This sub activity was the highest cost. Since, this sub activity is a manual
record that takes time to find stock card of each drug.
The carrying charge of drugs stored in refrigerator and drugs stored in
room temperature were 0.0125 and 0.0120 (Baht/Baht/year) on average, respectively.
This carrying charge implied that the carrying cost was 1.25% and 1.20% of the
average inventory value. In this study assumes that more expensive items are apt to
be riskier to carry and more expensive to handle or store.
In Thailand, The past studies of the cost of purchasing and inventory
management, they were studied both private hospitals and public hospital. Some
studies determined full cost of both direct and indirect cost but some concerned only
direct cost. The studies were conducted in Sena hospital (39) and Chachoengsao
hospital (40) revealed that the full cost drug stock was 751,422.22 Baht and
2,210,929.42 Baht respectively. Kattiviriyaoinyo K. studied about assessment of drug
purchasing system of private hospitals in 1998 (18). The study conducted in 2 private
hospitals showed that the direct cost of purchasing was 592,733 and 432,946 Baht.
And the direct cost of inventory control was 2,294,497 Bath and 530,160 Baht.
In this study, the capital cost was the smallest portion because the drug
purchasing unit and drug inventory management unit was located at building over 20
years, thus depreciation cost was determined as one Baht. The smallest portion of
capital cost was similar to the study in Sena and Chachoengsao hospital (39) (40). The
results of studies come out different. Thus, there were not constant optimal purchasing
and inventory management costs for all hospitals, but that they may depend on size of
hospital, basic environment, private or public hospital and purchasing and inventory
management.
The purpose of this study is to find out if re-order point model can
improve the efficiency of drug inventory management at Ramathibodi Hospital by
employing inventory performance data during the fiscal year 2006. Inventory
management indicators were indicated the performance of inventory management.
Indicators indicated only how well drug inventory system performance. Drug
inventory indicators in this study were average inventory values, inventory turnover
and inventory cost. It is widely accepted that good inventory management could be
shown by the low inventory value, high turnover rate and low cost. The comparison of
inventory performance indicators between the existing system and (s,S) model
performed in this study.
Inventory turnover
Inventory turnover equals the ratio of the total number of items used per
year to the average daily inventory. The Ministry of Public Health suggested an
indicator in the development of the inventory management of a hospital. That
indicator was inventory turnover. A good inventory system of hospital should have the
inventory turnover not less than 4.
In this study, Eprex, Metformin and Vitamin B Complex showed that the
inventory turnover of the existing was 12.68, 16.94 and 5.18 while the inventory
turnover of the (s,S) model was 24.21, 23.34 and 12.06, respectively. The comparison
of the inventory turnover between two systems found that in the (s,S) model increase
the inventory turnover of Vitamin B Complex was the highest (132.84 %), Eprex was
lower (90.90%) and Metformin was lowest (37.76%).
The survey inventory turnover value studied among hospital in Thailand
founds that the inventory turnover of public hospital was 6-9.3 and private hospital
was 8.8-10.2 (38). Khon Kaen hospital had the inventory value 7.89. For all 3 drugs
had the inventory turnover higher than the amount suggested by the Ministry of Public
Health. Eprex and Metformin had the inventory turnover higher than range of the
other hospitals except Vitamin B Complex.
Inventory cost
The objective of an inventory control system is to make that minimize the
total cost of inventory. Most pharmacy inventory decisions involve replenishment.
There are costs associated with pharmacy inventory such as ordering cost and carrying
cost (41).
The comparison of total costs of drug inventory management between two
systems among selected drugs showed that the (s,S) model decrease total costs of drug
inventory management of Eprex was the highest (39.09%), Vitamin B Complex was
lower (38.43 %) and Metformin was lowest (16.08%). The (s,S) model; the highest
decreasing total costs of drug inventory management was Eprex . Due to Eprex was
the high inventory value. If the inventory level reduction would lead to low cost of
inventory management too.
Analysis of purchasing cost and carrying cost found that in the existing
system incurred the purchasing cost lower than the (s,S) model. In the opposite, (s,S)
model had the carrying cost and the total costs of drug inventory management lower
than the existing system. Because the frequency of drug purchasing in the (s,S) model
was higher than the existing system.
From the result of this study found that the (s,S) model reduced the
average inventory value and inventory cost of Eprex equal 958,071.42 and 10,084.69
Baht in fiscal year 2006. So, this model appropriate saving budget for high value drug.
For bulkiness drug are Metformin, inventory turnover rate would be considered. The
increment of inventory turnover rate that would be reflects the problem of storage
CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations
There are some recommendations occur from the study.
1. For higher performance of inventory management hospitals should be
more concerned with the quantity of drug purchasing.
2. The regulations for drug purchasing some obstacles for drug
purchasing and inventory management in both the existing and (s,S) model. So to
become successful in implement, the government should modify the regulations
related to drug purchasing. They could set the frequency of purchasing in each item as
many times as required such as of the price agreement purchasing method.
3. Electronic database and computer technology of the hospital is an
important source of information and knowledge for hospital management. It can help
in management and administration creates a system. For that reason, it should be
continuously developed for improvement system of hospital.
REFERENCES
12. Bernstein S. J., Hilborne L. H. Clinical indicators: the road to quality care?
Jt Commm J Qual Improv 1993; 19(11):501-9.
13. Quick JD, et al. Managing drug supply. 2nd ed. West Hartford: Kumarian Press;
1997.
14. Carrol NV. Financial Managements for Pharmacist: A Decision-making Approach. 2nd
ed. Baltimore: William and Willkins; 1998.
15. Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP technical assistance bulletin. on hospital
drug distribution and control. Am J Hosp Pharm 1980; 37:1097–103.
16. Long S. 1997/98 Annual report: Hospital pharmacy in Canada survey report.
Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 1999; 52(1):s1-40.
25. Jie Y HD, Wei W, Jin D. A New Optimal Policy for Service System with
Nonstationary Stochastic Demand. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE
International Conference on Services Computing 2008 2008: IEEE
Computer Society; 2008. p. 595-596
38. Chuenpitikul K. Third party logistics provider (3PLs) for drug inventory management
among Thai people [M.Sc. Thesis in Pharmacy Administration]. Bangkok:
Mahidol University; 2009.
39. Thadtapong K. Unit cost analysis of Pharmacy Department services at Sena Hospital
[M.Sc. Thesis in Pharmacy Administration]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 1998.
40. Rangpholsumrit M. Unit cost of pharmacy service in 1998 at Chachoengsao Hospital
[M.Sc. Thesis in Hospital Pharmacy]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 1999.
41. Thimas F. Hughes. Objectives of an effective inventory control system. American
Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 1984; 41:2078-85.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
FUNCTIONAL FLOW DIAGRAM OF DRUG PURCHASING AND
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT
drug purchasing
Drug
Central
Finance inventory
Drug purchasing unit GPO Supplier Director inventory
unit control
unit
unit
Start
Update stock
Drug under
limit list
Receive request
Determine drug list Write in GPO
form by drug
by pharmacist request form
representative
Inform drug
Record list that can
purchasing data deliver
Yes
Purchasing Fax Purchasing Fax
order order reply
Head of purchasing
unit sign in
purchasing order
Head of pharmacy
department sign in
purchasing order
Send Proceed in
document purchasing
Proceed in
Determine purchasing
and Sign in
purchasing
order
Proceed in
purchasing
Receive document
representative
receive representative
Record permit purchasing receive
purchasing order order purchasing
order
Record date of
supplier
representative
receive purchasing Deliver
order drug
Receive
Deliver drug
drug
Check
No Revise
document
Yes
Head of pharmacy
department sign in
Send document to
central inventory unit
Finish
Purchasing
Drug rooms Drug inventory control unit
unit
Start
Request
2
order 2 Original
Consider narcotic Arrange drug and
Yes record quantity in
drug request order
Copy request order and
stock card
No
Copy Original
Pharmacist
Arrange check drug , record
drug and and check correction of
record No original and copy
request order
Check drug
No Revise
and record
Yes Yes
Revise
Record data in
Yes computer
Receive Deliver drug with
drug copy request order
Summary Summary drug can not
dispensing report Dispensing report
Check
correction of record and drug
Revise No
cannot dispensing list
by pharmacist
Pharmacist
Pharmacistsign
signinin
original
originalrequest
requestorder
order Yes
and
andrecord
recordreport
report
Send
Sendoriginal
originalrequest
requestorder
order
and
andrecord
recordreport
reporttoto
purchasing
purchasingunit
unit
Update
Update
stock
stock
Finish
Finish
Drug
Druginventory
inventorycontrol
controlunit
unit Central
Central
Purchasing
Purchasing
Supplier
Supplier inventory
inventory
unit
unit department
department
Start
Invoice : original
and 8 copies
Document for
Quality report commitee
No
(reject) Invoice copy22
Revise Record data for drug
receiving Invoice copy 1
1
Drug
deliver
Check drug by
committee from
No Yes
pharmacy
department
Check drug by
committee from other Yes
Reject drug ,return Yes department
document and delete data
Record in Check drug
receiving by inventory
book No staff
Yes
Yes
Central
Central
Supplier
Supplier Drug
Druginventory
inventorycontrol
controlunit
unit Purchasing
Purchasingunit
unit inventory
inventory
department
department
Drug receiving
1 list Report 1
Drug receiving
list Report 2
Record
Recorddrug
drug
receiving
receivinglist
list
Drug receiving
list Report 3
Transfer data to
purchasing unit
Summary report
Check and
arrange No Revise
document
Yes
Sign in by head
of inventory
Proceed for
control unit
normal
purchasing
method Proceed for
Send special
document purchasing
method
Update
stock
Finish
Start
Report stock
level
Yes
Pharmacist sign in
stock card
Yes
Stamp date
Start
Yes
Pharmacist sign in
stock card
Inventory
Inventorycontrol
controlunit
unit
Start
Checking nearly
No Record in report
expired drugs
Yes
Record in report
Proceed in exchange
nearly expire drug
APPENDIX B
DEMAND DISTRIBUTION
Normality test of Eprex demand per week during fiscal year 2005-2007 by
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig.
0.0477 156 0.2000
Normality test of Metformin demand per week during fiscal year 2005-2007 by
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig.
0.0708 156 0.0539
Normality test of Vitamin B complex demand per week during fiscal year
2005-2007 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig.
0.1126 156 0.0001
Histogram of Vitamin B complex demand per week during fiscal year 2005-2007
Weibull distribution test of Vitamin B complex demand per week during fiscal year
2005-2007 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig.
0.07981 156 0.2624
BIOGRAPHY