Managing Hemoptysis What To Do or What Not To Do
Managing Hemoptysis What To Do or What Not To Do
Managing Hemoptysis What To Do or What Not To Do
27]
Letters to Editor
Letters to Editor
breathlessness, and loss of appetite or weight. There were and was advised surgery in view of persistent hemoptysis,
no unusual food or animal exposures. He received empiric significantly restricting young patients’ life; however,
treatment for pulmonary TB (on radiological basis but bilateral disease led to confusion among physicians and
bacteriologically not confirmed) 2 years back for 9 months. surgeons about the side to operate, and he was left on
He did not regularly use any other significant medication wait and watch policy. The patient had no indications
such as aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory of respiratory distress or stigmata of recent massive
drugs or drug abuse. He had no history of trauma, rash, hemoptysis at the time of admission. His vital signs
kidney disease, hematuria, or known autoimmune were stable: afebrile, blood pressure 120/80 mmHg,
disease. The patient underwent workup for hemoptysis heart rate 92/min, respirations 20/min, and oxygen
at different hospitals and underwent bronchoscopy saturation 96% on room air. Head and neck examination
which was unremarkable, and high‑resolution computed revealed dry mucosa with no evidence of trauma and
tomography (HRCT) thorax showed thick‑walled cavities no lymphadenopathy. Oropharyngeal examination was
in bilateral upper lobes. He was treated conservatively normal. Systemic examination was normal. The patient’s
a b c d
e f g h
Figure 1: (a) Chest skiagram revealed haziness in right (yellow vertical arrow) and left (black vertical arrow) upper lobes. (b‑f) High‑resolution
computed tomography thorax showed small area of cavitation with calcification in apical segment of the right upper lobe as well as apicoposterior
segment of left upper lobe along with surrounding ground‑glass opacity seen exclusively in the left upper lobe (black vertical arrow in e) suggestive of
active source of bleeding. (g and h) The presence of calcified opacity likely broncholith (black horizontal arrow in h) in dilated bronchi communicating
with cavity of left upper lobe especially observed in sagittal section
a b c d
e f g h
Figure 2: (a and b) Gross examination of the resected specimen of lung tissue revealed smooth‑walled cavity measuring 2 cm × 2 cm × 1 cm
with a small broncholith of 0.3 cm (indicated by yellow vertical arrow in a). (c‑h) Microscopic histopathological examination of sections from the
cavity showed granulomas (black vertical arrow in g) with giant cells (white horizontal chevron in d, g, h), foci of calcification (yellow vertical arrow
in f), and mononuclear inflammation suggestive of granulomatous inflammation suggestive of tuberculosis. Lung parenchyma showed alveoli with
hemorrhage and occasional hemosiderin‑laden macrophages (blue horizontal arrow in e) (H and E, ×40 and × 100 respectively)
Letters to Editor
hemoglobin level was 14.9 g/dL, and the hematocrit was approach in this case, but it is not definitive as probability
41.2%. Rest laboratory parameters including platelet of recurrences are high especially with broncholith as a
count, coagulation as well as vasculitis profile were posttubercular sequelae.[5]
within normal limits. The fecal occult blood test was
negative. Two‑dimensional echocardiography showed a Another issue is that what will be the treatment of
normal ejection fraction and no valvular defect. Chest choice if the same patient reports again with massive or
skiagram revealed nonhomogeneous opacity in the left recurrent hemoptysis from lesion on opposite side, i.e.,
upper lobe. HRCT thorax showed small area of cavitation apical segment of the right upper lobe. It is a matter of
with calcification in bilateral upper lobes along with open debate whether this patient should be treated with
surrounding ground‑glass opacity seen in left upper conservative strategy and observation, bronchoscopic
lobe and a calcified opacity likely broncholith in dilated techniques, BAE, or surgery. All these interventions have
bronchus communicating with cavity of the left upper lobe their own merits and demerits with weak evidence‑based
as shown in Figure 1. Triple‑phase computed tomography support. The choice of treatment depends on several
angiography did not reveal any abnormal vascular origin factors such as age, comorbid illnesses, etiology,
of bleeding. Repeat bronchoscopy confirmed focal pulmonary function status, localization of bleeding,
source of active bleeding from apicoposterior segment response to different methods, and availability or
of the left upper lobe. Bronchoalveolar lavage was taken feasibility of technical expertise.[5] Good clinical practice
from left upper lobe and was freshly hemorrhagic. guides surgical modality to be preferred in clear scenarios,
The microbiological profile including GeneXpert was for example, unilateral disease with good functional
negative for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). status of the patient and no significant co-morbidities
Case was reviewed with interventional cardiologist tilting risk–benefit ratio in its favor. However, it is
for bronchial artery embolization (BAE) together with difficult to convince majority of patients for a feasible
thoracic surgical opinion for segmentectomy. Informed option in real life situations despite proper counselling.
decision for surgical option was reached by the family A very intuitive and detailed analysis of each case is
and patient after risk versus benefit of both options were required before assigning an individual option. This
explained in multidisciplinary meeting among all medical has to be decided by a multidisciplinary team including
and family members involved in decision‑making. The clinicians of different specialities. The patients along
patient underwent left apicoposterior segmentectomy with family members should also be made part of the
without any complication and the specimen was sent for team. This will facilitate decision-making process easy
histopathological examination. Gross examination revealed as they will be made well aware of all available options
smooth‑walled cavity measuring 2 cm × 2 cm × 1 cm, with with risk-benefit ratio. In our case, although the patient
a small broncholith of 0.3 cm being the source of bleeding was young and needed to live life without constant fear of
as shown in Figure 2. Microscopic examination showed life‑threatening hemoptysis and had broncholith beyond
evidence of granulomatous inflammation, but GeneXpert reach of bronchoscope, the decision to operate was still
as well as culture was negative for MTBC. The patient was not easy. The patient had multiple hospitalizations and
discharged after 7 days and is under regular follow‑up opinions, but clear advice could not be reached.
for the last 1 year and reported no further episodes of
hemoptysis. There are still many controversies and unresolved issues
regarding the management of massive or recurrent
Such situations are of common occurrence in day‑to‑day hemoptysis from center to center as there is lack of
practice and a matter of concern is that what should have consensus‑based practical guidelines. Various treatment
been the approach if bleeding could not have been localized options are currently practiced depending on the
to broncholith as both lungs had pathological findings in physician’s discretion, expertise, and available resources.[2]
this case? Here, determining the cause and the location Therefore, there is a need to develop guidelines in near
of bleeding becomes an important issue. Mostly patients future for managing massive or recurrent hemoptysis
in our country with bilateral disease are not even sent for systematically and also to emphasize on multidisciplinary
thoracic surgical review. However, scrupulous radiologic as approach. There is urgent need for research in this area,
well as bronchoscopic examinations may provide valuable and we think multidisciplinary approach in all cases with
information regarding surgically correctable cause, recurrent moderate‑to‑severe hemoptysis can only bring
for example, mycotic ball in a cavity or broncholiths[3] best outcomes till then.
even if disease is bilateral, but definitive treatment
remains surgery only. All endobronchial interventions Declaration of patient consent
(e.g., cold saline solution lavage, endobronchial balloon The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate
tamponade with or without endobronchial instillation of patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given
epinephrine, bronchoscopic instillation of thrombin or his consent for his images and other clinical information
fibrinogen–thrombin infusion, laser photocoagulation, to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that
endobronchial blockers, and radiotherapy) or BAE are name and initials will not be published and due efforts
temporalizing procedures[4] with surgical therapy being will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot
only “curative.” BAE could have been an alternative be guaranteed.
Letters to Editor
Financial support and sponsorship tuberculosis: The phoenix of thoracic surgery? J Thorac Dis 2013;5:198‑9.
5. Radchenko C, Alraiyes AH, Shojaee S. A systematic approach to
Nil.
the management of massive hemoptysis. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:S1069‑86.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License,
which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially,
as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under
Abhijeet Singh, Sanjeev Singhal, Nitin Jain, the identical terms.
Deepak Talwar
Access this article online
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Metro Centre
Quick Response Code:
for Respiratory Diseases, Metro Multi Speciality Hospital, Noida, Website:
Uttar Pradesh, India www.lungindia.com
E‑mail: [email protected]
REFERENCES
DOI:
1. Stedman TL. Stedman’s Medical Dictionary. 28th ed. Baltimore, MD: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_82_18
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 872.
2. Dixit R, Singh N, Gupta RC. Management issues in haemoptysis:
More questions than answers. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci
How to cite this article: Singh A, Singhal S, Jain N, Talwar D.
2013;55:237‑8.
Managing hemoptysis: What to do or what not to do?. Lung India
3. Halezeroğlu S, Okur E. Thoracic surgery for haemoptysis in the context
2018;35:449-52.
of tuberculosis: What is the best management approach? J Thorac Dis
2014;6:182‑5.
© 2018 Indian Chest Society | Published by Wolters Kluwer ‑ Medknow
4. Bertolaccini L, Viti A, Di Perri G, Terzi A. Surgical treatment of pulmonary