Research Papers Involving The Tsi Respicon™ Sampler: Application Note Iti-080
Research Papers Involving The Tsi Respicon™ Sampler: Application Note Iti-080
Research Papers Involving The Tsi Respicon™ Sampler: Application Note Iti-080
INVOLVING THE
TSI RESPICON™
SAMPLER
APPLICATION NOTE ITI-080
1. Li Shou-Nan, Lundgren D.A., Rovell-Rixx D., Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers. American Industrial
Hygiene Assoc. Journal, Vol. 61(4), pg. 506-516 (2000).
Six inhalable aerosol samplers were evaluated experimentally as area samplers using monodisperse solid
particles with aerodynamic diameters ranging from 5 to 68 mm. Sampler performance and inside particle loss at
two test wind speeds (0.55 and 1.1 m/sec) and three wind orientations (0, 90, and 180 degrees) were
investigated. The six inhalable aerosol samplers tested were a RESPICON™ sampler, an Institute of
Occupational Medicine (IOM), a seven-hole, a conical inhalable sampler, a prototype button sampler, and a
closed-face 37-mm cassette. The area sampling performance of the RESPICON™ sampler matched the inhalable
convention fairly well. The sampling performances of the other five samplers depended on wind speed, wind
direction, and particle size, and they may not be appropriate for area sampling if the wind speeds are greater
than 0.5 m/sec.
2. Koch, W. Dunkhorst, W. Lodding, H., RESPICON TM-3 F: a new personal measuring system for size segregated
dust measurement at workplaces. Staub Reinhaltung der Luft. Vol. 57(5), pg 177-184 (1997).
In this paper a new device for health related dust measurement at workplaces is described. The instrument is a
personal dust monitoring and sampling system. The inhalable, the thoracic and the alveolar fraction of the
airborne dust are simultaneously sampled, and monitored on-line. The sampling characteristics of the device
follow the convention of the European Standard EN 481. The measuring principle is a combination of inertial
classification and concentration enrichment using a virtual impactor, filter sampling and aerosol photometry. The
instrument is described in detail and the results of test and calibration measurements as well as measurements
at workplaces are presented.
3. Koch, W. Dunkhorst, W., and Lödding, H., Design and Performance of a New Personal Aerosol Monitor. Aerosol
Sci & Tech., Vol. (31), pg.231-246 (1999).
Three particle size fractions of the airborne dust are defined in European and US standards for health-related
dust measurements at the workplace: the respirable, the thoracic, and the inhalable fraction. We developed a
novel instrument for personal, time-resolved concentration monitoring and sampling of these three fractions. The
instrument combines inertial classification, filter sampling and photometric aerosol detection. It consists of a two-
stage virtual impactor (cut-off diameters of 4 and 10 µm), three filters, and three light scattering photometers.
The virtual impactor serves as a particle size classifier and a coarse particle concentrator. This enrichment
compensates for the decreasing particle mass-based photometric sensitivity with increasing particle diameter.
The optical sensors are calibrated in-situ via the mass concentrations obtained gravimetrically from the filter
samples. The device operates at a flow rate of 3.1 l/min. There is good agreement between the experimentally
determined particle size-dependent collection efficiencies and the definition curves of the corresponding dust
fractions. The size dependence of the sensitivity of the inertial concentrator and photometric detection units
follow the definition curves qualitatively. Exposure data were obtained for different workplace environments
characterized by temporally and spatially highly fluctuating concentrations. The field measurements have shown
that the instrument is practicable under rough industrial conditions and that it enables a more comprehensive
and more realistic characterization of the individual exposure of workers to health-endangering dusts than was
previously possible.
4. Rando, R., Poovey, H., Mokadam, D., Glindmeyer, H., Performance of the RESPICON for size-selective sampling
of wood dust. 2000 American Industrial Hygiene Conference & Exposition, Orlando, FL, May 20–25, 2000.
The RESPICON™ sampler is a three-stage virtual impactor that simultaneously collects the ISO/CEN/ACGIH size
fractions of inhalable, thoracic, and respirable particulate. The device is especially attractive for sampling of wood dust
because virtual impaction onto glass-fiber filters minimizes dust overload and particle bounce, and the sampling inlet
geometry should prevent intrusion of large wood chips. The performance of the device for wood dust was evaluated
against reference size-selective samplers: the IOM sampler (inhalable dust), the GK 2.69 cyclone (BGI, Inc.) (thoracic
dust), and the SKC aluminum cyclone (respirable dust). Side-by-side personal monitoring of wood dust exposure using
the RESPICON™ sampler and reference samplers along with cascade centripeter area samples was performed in a
small woodworking shop. Eight sets of samples were collected in the breathing zone (BZ) of an individual sanding pine
and oak boards using an electric sheet sander. According to the reference samplers, the mean (range) dust levels for
3 3 3
sanding of pine were: inhalable, 9.19 mg/m (5.34-12.1); thoracic, 3.86 mg/m (2.76-4.58); and respirable, 1.79 mg/m
3 3
(1.50-2.26). For sanding of oak, the mean dust levels were: inhalable, 5.08 mg/m (2.43-8.09); thoracic, 1.75 mg/m
3
(1.46-2.17); and respirable, 0.94 mg/m (0.47-1.63). According to the centripeter, the MMADs of the dust averaged 7
mm and 6.4 mm, for pine and oak, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in the performance of the
RESPICON™ sampler for size-selective sampling of the dusts of the two wood types. Regression analyses of the results
from the RESPICON™ sampler against the respective reference sampler yielded the following slopes: inhalable dust,
0.98; thoracic dust, 1.0; and respirable dust, 0.80. These data suggest that the RESPICON is appropriate for size-
selective sampling of wood dust, although the respirable fraction may require an adjustment factor for improved
accuracy.
5. D. Stephenson, D., Spear, T., Seymour, M., Comparison of Methods for Personal Sampling of Inhalable and
Total Abrasive Blasting Aerosol, 2001 American Industrial Hygiene Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA,
June 2–7, 2001.
Inhalation of occupational aerosols remains a significant cause of mortality in the work environment. During the
29-year period from 1968 to1996 NIOSH has documented over 113,000 workplace related pneumoconiosis
deaths among United States (U.S.) residents, age 15 and over. Exposure to occupational aerosols is estimated
by the physical sampling of air in a worker's breathing zone. The traditional approach to evaluating worker
exposure to aerosols that pose a health risk when particulate matter is deposited at any site within the
pulmonary system is commonly referred to as "total aerosol" sampling. In the United States, the traditional
method for collecting "total aerosol" is through the use of a 37-mm, closed faced sampling cassette. Since the
late1970's "total aerosol" sampling using this device has been scrutinized because of its decreased collection
efficiency when used with aerosols having relatively large particle sizes (approximately 45 µm or greater). This
limitation has resulted in a new aerosol size fraction termed "inhalable aerosol" which is expressed as a
sampling convention, which samplers for this fraction must emulate. The RESPICON™ sampler is a sampling
device marketed as having the ability to accurately collect an aerosol's inhalable fraction. This research uses
aerosol data collected during abrasive blasting operations to perform a side-by-side comparison study
investigating differences in the collection efficiencies of the 37-mm total aerosol sampler and the RespiCon™
inhalable aerosol sampler. Research results include the estimation of total and inhalable aerosol exposure by
the quantification of TWA mass concentration values, the determination of statistically significant differences
between TWA concentration results obtained from each total and inhalable aerosol sampler, and the estimation
of a conversion factor between the two measures of exposure.
-2-
6. Roy Rando, Halet Poovey, Dinkar Mokadam, Joseph Brisolara, Field Performance of the RESPICON™ for Size-
Selective Sampling of Industrial Wood Processing Dust. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene,
Vol. 2, 219-226 (2005).
The RESPICON™ sampler is a multistage virtual impactor that simultaneously collects the ISO/CEN/ACGIH size
fractions of inhalable, thoracic, and respirable particulate matter. The field performance of the device for
measurement of industrial wood processing dust was evaluated against reference size-selective samplers: the
IOM sampler (inhalable dust), the GK 2.69 cyclone (thoracic dust), and the SKC aluminum cyclone (respirable
dust). Seventy-one sets of area samples were collected from 10 wood processing plants, with the samplers
mounted either in the free-field or on a two-dimensional “bluff body.” The geometric mean (range) dust levels
3
across all plants measured by the reference samplers were: inhalable, 1.35 mg/m (0.11–11.06); thoracic, 0.31
3 3
mg/m (0.05–1.38); and respirable, 0.10 mg/m (0.02–0.54). In comparing the RESPICON™ sampler with the
reference samplers, there was no significant difference between sampling in the free-field versus bluff-body
modes. For inhalable dust, there was no significant difference between the RESPICON™ sampler and the IOM
sampler after applying a correction factor of 1.5× to the extrathoracic data obtained from the RESPICON™
sampler. Without the correction factor, the RESPICON™ sampler undersample inhalable dust by an average of
23%. For thoracic dust, the RESPICON™ sampler was shown to oversample the extrathoracic dust fraction
resulting in an overall error of 48%. A simple correction based on the inhalable and thoracic dust levels reported
by the RESPICON™ sampler is proposed. For respirable dust, there was a significant difference between the
RESPICON™ sampler and the SKC cyclone, but the data were equivocal due to imprecision in measurement of
the low respirable dust concentrations encountered and the likelihood of bias in the reference sampler. Overall,
the RESPICON™ sampler sampler appears to be a suitable size-selective sampling device for industrial wood
processing dust, although adjustments should be made to the inhalable and thoracic dust results.