Merakes Development Project: Floating Production Unit Upgrade EPCI-1

MERAKES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FLOATING PRODUCTION UNIT UPGRADE
EPCI-1
CHEMICAL INJECTION PACKAGE – STRUCTURAL CALCULATION NOTE

(INCLUDING LIFTING LUGS)
03 EX-DE 28/05/19 Final Issue FAJAR J.N ZEKI M. EFRIZAL

02 EX-DE 11/02/19 Issued for Review FAJAR J.N ZEKI M. EFRIZAL
Rev Validity
Number Status Date Description Prepared Checked Approved
Revision Index
Company logo and business name Project name Company Document ID
Merakes 220810DOCAWC014
Development Job N.
Eni East Sepinggan Ltd Project -
Contractor logo and business name Contractor Document ID
870126-WCS-001-STR-CAL-WC014
Contract N. 870126
Vendor/Subcontractor logo and business name Vendor/Subcontractor Document ID
J18-2036-01-SSCALC
PO/ Contract N. 1256125

Facility Sub Facility Name Scale Sheet of Sheets
Floating Production Unit n.a. 1 / 34
Document Title Supersedes N. n.a
STRUCTURAL CALCULATION NOTE (INCLUDING Superseded by N. n.a

LIFTING LUGS) Plant Area Plant Unit
Top Sides 001
This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd
It shall neither be shown to Third Parties not used for purposes other than those for which it has been sent.
Revision Index Sheet of
220810DOCAWC014 Sheets
Rev Validity
Number Status
2 of 34
Eni East Sepinggan,Ltd
STRUCTURAL CALCULATION 03 EX-DE
NOTE (INCL. LIFTING LUGS)
Project / Initiative name FPU Jangkrik Production Increase Capacity

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this document is to provide a structural calculation of skids including lifting
lugs and spreader bar with wire rope/slings and shackle selection base on offshore lifting
as per applicable rules for Chemical Injection Pump Skids of MERAKES Development
Project.
Document Verification
Prepared by Signature Date

Vendor Prepared
Fajarjoko Nugroho 28/05/2020
Checked by Signature Date

Zeki Midi 28/05/2020
Approved by Signature Date

Efrizal 28/05/2020
Checked by Unit Signature Date

Company
Checked
Checked by Unit Signature Date
Approved by Unit Signature Date

Approved
Company
Endorsed by Unit Signature Date

Rev Validity
Number Status
3 of 34
REVISION List
00 Issued for Review

03 Final Issue
HOLD List

Rev Validity
Number Status
4 of 34
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5
1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................... 5
1.2 Scope and Purpose ........................................................................................... 7
2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS .................................................................................. 9
2.1 Project Documents ........................................................................................... 9
2.2 Vendor Documents ........................................................................................... 9
2.3 Standard .......................................................................................................... 9
3 DEFINITION AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................ 10
3.1 Definition ....................................................................................................... 10
3.2 Abbreviation ................................................................................................... 10
4 DESIGN CONDITION ....................................................................................... 11
4.1 General Approach ........................................................................................... 11
4.2 Structural Idealization ................................................................................... 11
4.3 Materials ........................................................................................................ 11
4.4 Co-ordinate System ........................................................................................ 12
4.5 Design Lift Force ............................................................................................ 12
4.6 Acceptance Criteria ........................................................................................ 12
5 LIFTING SETS SELECTION AND PAD EYES CALCULATION ............................... 13
5.1 Boundary Condition and Load Application ...................................................... 13
5.2 Analysis Model and Support Location ............................................................. 13
5.3 Load Cases and C.o.G Location ....................................................................... 14
5.4 Lifting Sets Selection ...................................................................................... 15
5.5 Pad Eyes Calculation ...................................................................................... 16
5.5.1 Skid Pad Eyes ................................................................................................ 16
5.5.2 Spreader Bar Pad Eyes .................................................................................. 18
6 SKID BEAM AND SPREADER BAR CALCULATION (LIFTING) ............................ 19
6.1 Skid Beam Calculation .................................................................................... 19
6.2 Spreader Bar Calculation ................................................................................ 21
7 TRANSPORTATION AND OPERATING CONDITION LOAD CALCULATION .......... 23
7.1 Attachment-1 Shackle and Master Link Assembly Datasheet .......................... 24
7.2 Attachment-2 Transportation and Operating Condition Load Calculation ....... 27

Rev Validity
Number Status
5 of 34
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background
Merakes development is an important initiative for Eni that will contribute to regional
growth and consolidate leadership role in the offshore South Kutei basin.
The East Sepinggan Block (2,913 km2) is located offshore in the deep water area of the
Kutei Basin, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The Kutei Basin is one of the main producing
basin of Indonesia with more than 45 Tcf gas and 4,000 MMbbls oil reserves discovered,
mostly in Miocene/Pliocene sands.
Figure 1 - East Sepinggan Block
The block was included in the 1st Indonesian Bidding Round of 2012; it was awarded to
eni Indonesia on 20th July 2012, with working interest of 100%. The license type is a
Production Sharing Contract (PSC), with a six year exploration period (3+3 years).
Currently Pertamina has farmed in with a 15% quote.
East Sepinggan is adjoining the Muara Bakau & Makassar Strait PSC. In Muara Bakau eni
discovered Jangkrik and Jangkrik NE. In Makassar Strait PSC Chevron has Maha-
Gendalo4 discovery (Mean OGIP ~580 Bcf).

Rev Validity
Number Status
6 of 34
Merakes field is a dry gas discovery (very low CGR). The discovery is in around 1400 m
water depth. Merakes is located South in respect to Eni-operated Jangkrik field with a
linear distance of 35 km. Linear distance to shore instead is around 100 km.
Jangkrik is a deepwater project currently in execution, which started producing through

a Floating-Production Unit in the second quarter of 2017. It is constituted by a subsea
architecture with 5 manifolds, 10 gas production wells, 5 production risers, a local FPU
to process 450 MMSCFD of gas and associated water and condensate. Treated gas and
condensate are exported to shore for fiscal metering and selling via dedicated 24” gas
and 4” liquid pipeline. Gas final destination is local users and Bontang LNG plant in the
Kalimantan island.
Eni Indonesia drilled the Merakes-1 exploration well with success and successfully drilled
and tested also Merakes 2, the first appraisal well of the Merakes discovery.
The proximity of Merakes 2 discovery to the Jangkrik field will allow to maximizing the
synergies with existing nearby infrastructures as well as to reduce costs and time of the
execution of the future subsea development it confirms the success of Eni the “near field”
exploration and appraisal strategy.
The Merakes development is based on a 5-well submarine tie-back to the Jangrik FPU.
The production of Merakes will take place with 5 submarine wells (Merakes-3, Merakes-
4, Merakes-5, Merakes-6, Merakes-7) for which a phasing is planned and the rump-up
will follow the depletion of Jangkrik Main and Jangkrik North East.
The current architecture will allow an early start-up with 2 wells (XT available from the
JKK project) and a rigid pipeline or possibly with 3 or 4 wells by means of both pipelines..
The submarine wells of Merakes will be connected to the FPU by means of a double
production line, each with its own SSIV located at the base of flexible riser, commanded
by a common umbilical. A 6-slot and double-header submarine manifold will be used to
collect the production from 5 wells in Main Lobe and will allow the sorting of production
on the two production pipelines in order to manage any pressure differences between the
wells. The manifold will be controlled.
The double production line is recommended for flexibility: at high flow rates, both lines
will be used, while at the minimum turn-down, only one line will be in production. The
two-line configuration will solve (or mitigate) both the problem of the accumulation of
liquid at minimum sag and the problem of velocity at maximum flow.
The manifold will have a pigging loop that will close the Loop with FPU for intelligent
pigging.
The submarine control of the field will be provided by a electro-hydraulic umbilical.

Merakes topside system shall be designed to allow the tie-in of future developments, at
a maximum distance of 50km from Merakes and with a number of subsea equipment
similar to Merakes project.

Rev Validity
Number Status
7 of 34
It is important to highlight that the FPU is owned by a different JV (Muara Bakau),

therefore it is of primary importance to put in place a methodology on the FPU to allow
allocation from Jangkrik and Merakes.
1.2 Scope and Purpose
This document presents the structural calculation of each chemical injection pump skid
base frame, pump support frame including lifting pad eyes and spreader bar with wire
rope/slings and shackles selection base on offshore lifting application and also presents
the analysis during transportation to FPU, operating, test, and blast condition at FPU as
below:
a. Structural analysis is carried out by manual calculation in accordance to recognized

engineering calculation practice, i.e API RP 2A-WSA Section 2.4.2 in order to make
sure that skid structures have adequate strength during offshore lifting.
b. The factored lift chemical injection pump skid weight (FW) considered in calculation
already cover the full complete assembly system that consists of tubing and fitting,
filters, instruments and supports, valves, pumps and accessories and provide a plus
of weight contingency 15%. Then, the design lift chemical injection pump weight
(DW) as load combination between dead load and live load with design load factor
(DAF) is applied to calculate the lifting pad eyes and skid beam and also to select the
suitable wire ropes/slings and shackles. The dead load, live load information and
design load factor each skid is provided in Table 1.
However, to simplify the structure frame and pad eyes design calculation, wire
ropes/slings and shackle selection, all skids will be applied the highest design lift
weight (DW) in Table 1.
c. The skid structure to be lifted by using common spreader bar single point with four
lifting pad eyes on skid.
Table 1:
Dead Load Live Load
Design load
Tag No. Calc’d weight Factored weight Oil + support
factor (DAF)Note
(W), kg’s 15% (FW), kg’s packing
101200XX001 684.0 787.0 160.0 2.0
101200XX002 661.0 760.0 160.0 2.0
101200XX006 1,754.0 2,017.0 160.0 2.0

Note: The DAF refer to API RP 2A Section 2.4.2c.

Rev Validity
Number Status
8 of 34
d. During transportation to FPU and operating, test and blast condition at FPU after
installation, the calculation will result the selected size of anchor, foundation bolt on
skid and sea fasting requirement with considering below condition:
- Wind speed, V : 30 m/s
- Longitudinal distance from centre of rotation, Xcg : 0.0 m
- Transverse distance from centre of rotation, Ycg : 0.0 m
- Vertical distance from centre of rotation, Zcg : 14.0 m
- Roll angle, Øroll : 20°
- Time period, Troll : 10 second
- Pitch angle, Øpitch : 12.5°
- Time period, Tpitch : 10 second
- Heave period, Theave : 10 second
- Heave acceleration, aheave : 1.96 m/s2

Rev Validity
Number Status
9 of 34
2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
2.1 Project Documents
[1] 07079.EQP.MEC.STD Lifting Lugs to Lift Equipment up to 3 tons
[2] 220801DMSG27002 General Specification for Packages
[3] 220810DMSG26014 Specification for MERAKES CI Packages
2.2 Vendor Documents

N/A
2.3 Standard
[1] API RP 2A-WSD Recommended Practice for Planning,
Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore
Platforms-Working Stress Design
[2] AISC ASD Specification for Structural Steel Buildings-
Allowable Strength Design
[3] DNVGL-ST-E273 2.7-3 Portable offshore units

Rev Validity
Number Status
10 of 34
3 DEFINITION AND ABBREVIATIONS

The following definition and abbreviations are applied to this document:
3.1 Definition
COMPANY (CPY) ENI East Sepinggan Ltd.
CONTRACTOR PT. Saipem Indonesia
VENDOR PT. Wilmax Control Systems
3.2 Abbreviation
FPU Floating Production Unit

HIPPS High Integrity Pressure Protection System
JKK Jangkrik
JNE Jangkrik North East
MMSCFD Millions of Standard Cubic Feet per Day
NPS Nominal Pipe Size
TKL Trunkline

Rev Validity
Number Status
11 of 34
4 DESIGN CONDITION
4.1 General Approach

This analysis is performed to verify the structural strength (Calculation) of each skid
structure to withstand the design lift load encountered during offshore lifting.
The design lift load shall be load combination that consist of dead load (self-weight skid)
and live load (Small quantity of liquid and temporary support packing), as described on
Section 1.2, for simplicity the skid structure and pad eyes design calculation, wire
ropes/slings and shackle selection, all skids will be applied 2,177 x 2.0 is equal to
4,354.0 kg’s or 42,713.0 N.
Standard API RP 2A-WSA Section 2.4.2 as reference is to help us to design and produce
skid structure that safely can be handled during the offshore lifting from vessel to
platform. The each skid is considered to require single event offshore lifting.
4.2 Structural Idealization

Structural idealization of skid is based on relevant general arrangement drawing (Ref.
Doc. No. 220810DMDAWC013) with consideration as follows:
 All the structure are modeled as 2D-beam element with appropriate section.
 Some beams are offset according to the actual joint connection.
 The wire rope are modeled as tension beams with C.o.G base on relevant lifting
arrangement drawing (Ref. Doc. No. 220810DJ DCWC023).
 For simplicity of case, all skids will only be applied with the highest load as shown in
Table 1.
4.3 Materials
Steel materials are specified in the general arrangement drawing (Ref. Doc. No.
220810DMDAWC013). Pad eyes steel material are used material type S275J0. Skid
beam, spreader bar and the other support frame, drip pan steel material is used S275JR.
Mechanical properties:
Material Min. yield strength Tensile strength Elongation Impact strength
Type (Transverse), MPa (Transverse), (Transverse), % (Longitudinal), J
MPa
S275J0 275.0 410.0 – 560.0 21 27 at 0oC
S275JR 275.0 410.0 – 560.0 21 27 at 20oC

Rev Validity
Number Status
12 of 34
4.4 Co-ordinate System

X axis, along the long side of structural skid
Y axis, along the short side of structural skid
Z axis, positive upwards
Unit Length – m
Weight / Load – kg
Force – Newton
4.5 Design Lift Force

Design lift force is provided in formula,
F = (Live load + Dead load) * DAF * g (N) …(1)
Where, g = Standard acceleration of gravity in m/s2 (9.81)
The design lift force is calculated,

F = (2,017 + 160) * 2.0 * 9.81 = 42,713.0 N
4.6 Acceptance Criteria
Design for strength using allowable strength design (ASD) as described in standard AISC.
1. The allowable strength of each structural component equals or exceeds the required
strength determined on the basis of the ASD load combination.
Ra ≤ Rn/Ω ....(2)
Where, Ra = calculated strength using ASD load combinations
Rn = nominal strength of material base on yield strength material
Ω = safety factor
2. Allowable deflection is less than L/250.

Rev Validity
Number Status
13 of 34
5 LIFTING SETS SELECTION AND PAD EYES CALCULATION
5.1 Boundary Condition and Load Application

Following boundary conditions are analyzed for pad eyes strength and stiffness as follow.
 The skid is considered to fix at the lifting single point.
 Design lift force is applied the C.o.G of each skid as applicable.
5.2 Analysis Model and Support Location
Fixed Fixed
β = 30o
suppor suppor
Max. RSL5
RSL6
β = 30o Z
Y
Max.
X
RSL1, 2 RSL3, 4
Ø = 10o
Max.
[0, 0,0]
2D Model for Skid Tag No. 101200XX001 (Scale Inhibitor)
Fixed Fixed
β = 30o
suppor suppor
Max. RSL5
RSL6
β = 30o Z
Y
Max.
X
RSL1, 2 RSL3, 4
Ø = 10o
Max.
[0, 0,0]
2D Model for Skid Tag No. 101200XX002 (Corrosion Inhibitor)

Rev Validity
Number Status
14 of 34
Fixed Fixed
β = 30o
suppor suppor
Max. RSL5
Z RSL6
Y
β = 30o
Max.
X
RSL1, 2 RSL3, 4 Ø = 10o

Max.
[0, 0,0]
2D Model for Skid Tag No. 101200XX006 (Methanol)
5.3 Load Cases and C.o.G Location

Basic load case
Dead Load Live Load
Design load
Tag No. Calc’d weight Factored weight Oil + support
factor (DAF)Note
(W), kg’s 15% (FW), kg’s packing
101200XX001 684.0 787.0 160.0 2.0
101200XX002 661.0 760.0 160.0 2.0
101200XX006 1,754.0 2,017.0 160.0 2.0
Center of Gravity (C.o.G), mm
X Y Z
101200XX001 692.0 401.0 363.0
101200XX002 766.0 481.0 334.0
101200XX006 922.0 772.0 792.0

Rev Validity
Number Status
15 of 34
5.4 Lifting Sets Selection

Design of lift points, i.e. pad eye, shackle, wire rope sling, master link, spreader bar and
their connections shall be assessed using Resultant Sling Load (RSL).
The Resultant Sling Load (RSL) for lifting sets selection of more than 4 legs with spreader
bar is calculated,
RSL = 1.2 * 0.665 * F / Cos β …(3)
RSL = 1.2 * 0.665 * 42,713.0 / Cos 30o = 28,404.0 / 0.866 = 32,799.0 N
Where, β = Maximum 30o.

RSL = 1.2 * PLSKL * F / Cos β (DNVGL-ST-E273 Std.)
PLSKL = 0.665 (Percentage of loading F consider skew load effect 1.33 and
Un-certainty in C.o.G 0.5 or 50%, PLSKL = 1.33 * 0.5)
Note : 50% is considered the most extreme COG position
Configuration spreader bar with six legged steel wire rope sling consist of,
- 1 pc fabricated spreader bar.
- 1 pc 7/8” welded master link.
- 4 lgths 18mm dia. X 1800mm, 6x36 IWRC preformed galvanized, EIPS steel wire rope
c/w all ends turnback loop with aluminium ferrule and standard wire rope thimble.
- 2 lgths 18mm dia. X 1200mm, 6x36 IWRC preformed galvanized, EIPS steel wire rope
c/w all ends turnback loop with aluminium ferrule and standard wire rope thimble.
- 10 pcs 5/8” SWL 4.25 tonnes bolt type anchor shackles.
Sling leg dimensions:

- The minimum breaking load, MBL = 4 * RSLx.
- MBL = 4 * 32,799.0 = 131,196 N.
Select the minimum breaking load of sling leg at least, MBL = 131,196 N.
Shackle dimension:
- MBL = 3 * 32,799.0 = 98,397 N
Select a shackle with a WLL of at least 3,250 kg’s with minimum ultimate strength 8 time
WLL or equal to 255,060 N (See shackle datasheet in Attachment 1).
Master link dimension:


Rev Validity
Number Status
16 of 34
- MBL = 3 * 32,799.0 = 98,397 N

Select a master link with a WLL of at least 6,668 kg’s with minimum ultimate strength 5
time WLL or equal to 33,340 kg’s (See master link Assy. datasheet in Attachment 1).
5.5 Pad Eyes Calculation
5.5.1 Skid Pad Eyes

Material pad eyes used S275J0 with mechanical properties below,
Min. yield strength Tensile strength (Rm), Elongation Impact strength

(Re), MPa MPa (Transverse), % (Longitudinal), J
275.0 410.0 – 560.0 21 27 at 0oC
RSLVyz RSL
β = 30 o
RSLx Ø = 10o
Max. Max.
RSLH1xy FH2xy FH
Weldment
Typical Pad Eye Arrangement
From result calculation of formula (3), the resulting sling load on the pad eyes is applied,
RSL = 32,799.0 N

Rev Validity
Number Status
17 of 34
RSLx = 32,799.0 / cos Ø = 32,799.0 / Cos 10o = 32,799.0 / 0.985 = 33,298.0 N
RSLVyz = Pr = RSL * Cos 30o = 32,799.0 * 0.866 = 28,404.0 N
RSLH1xy = Vr = RSL * Sin 30o = 32,799.0 * 0.5 = 16,400.0 N
FHT = FH + FH2xy = (5% * 33,298.0) + (RSLx * Sin 10o) = 1,665.0 + 5,782.0 = 7,447.0 N
Mr = 7,447.0 * 47 = 350,009.0 Nmm
Check the combined force calculation as per ASD criteria,

[(Pr/Pc + Mr/Mc] + (Vr/Vc)2 ≤ 1
Pc = Pn/Ω = 396,000.0 / 1.67 = 237,126.0 N --- Allowable tensile strength

Where, Pn = 275 * (120 * 12) = 396,000.0 N
Vc = Vn/Ω = 237,600.0 / 1.67 = 142,275.0 N --- Allowable shear strength

Where, Vn = 0.6 * 275 * (120 * 12) = 237,600.0 N
Mc = Mn/Ω = 792,000.0 / 1.67 = 474,251.0 Nmm --- Allowable bending strength

Where, Mn = 275 * ([1/12 * 120 * 123]/6) = 792,000.0 Nmm
[(28,404.0/237,126.0 + 350,009.0/474,251.0] + (16,400.0/142,275.0)2 ≤ 1

[0.120 + 0.738] + (0.115)2 ≤ 1
0.87 ≤ 1 is accepted
Check weldment strength,
Pad eyes require full penetrant weld so that the allowable stress on weld is same as with base metal.
The von mises equivalent stress σe = 0.85 * Re = 0.85 * 275 = 233.7 MPa
Vr = 16,400.0 N Pr = 28,404.0 N
Tr = 2,320,600.0 Nmm
Weld lgth, l = 618 mm
thk w = 5 mm b=189mm
d=120mm
Shear stress due to torsion T, Str = (Tr * C) / Jw
Where, C = [b2 + d2]1/2 / 2, C = (35,721 + 14,400)1/2 / 2 = 112.0 mm

Jw = (d / 6)*(3 * b2 + d2) = 2,431,260.0 mm3
Tr = Vr * dist. force to c.o.g weldment = 16,400.0 * 141.5 = 2,320,600.0 Nmm
Str = (2,320,600.0 * 112) / 2,431,260.0 = 107.0 MPa
Shear stress due to Pr, Spr = 28,404.0 / (618 * 5) = 28,404.0 / 3,090

Rev Validity
Number Status
18 of 34
Sy = 9.2 MPa
Shear stress due to Vr, Svr = 16,400.0 / (618 * 5) = 16,400.0 / 3,090

Sy = 5.3 MPa
Total shear stress, St = Str + Spr + Svr = 121.5 MPa
Tension stress due to bending moment, Sm = (M / Sw) and axial force, Ss = FHT / A * 5
Where, M = FHT * dist. force to c.o.g weldment = 7,447.0 * 141.5 = 1,053,751.0 Nmm
Sw = (d * b3/12) – ((d-2*w) * (b-2*w)3/12) = 14,938,749.0 mm4
A = l * w = 618 * 5 =3,090 mm2
Tension stress by bending moment, Sm = 1,053,751.0 / 14,938,749.0 = 0.07 MPa

Tension stress by axial force, Ss = 7,447.0 / 3,090 = 2.4 MPa
Total tension stress, Sts = Sm + Ss = 2.47 MPa
Von mises stress (Combined stress),

Maximum stress, σ1 = (2.47 + 0)/2 + sqrt (((2.47 - 0)/2)2 + (121.5)2)
Maximum stress, σ1 = 122.7 MPa
Minimum stress, σ2 = (2.47 + 0)/2 - sqrt (((2.47 - 0)/2)2 + (121.5)2)
Minimum stress, σ2 = -120.3 MPa
Von mises stress, σvm = sqrt (σ12 + σ22 + σ1*σ2)

Result σe (233.7 MPa) > 121.52 MPa is accepted.
5.5.2 Spreader Bar Pad Eyes

Pad eyes calculation at spreader bar may be considered the same as calculation performed at skid
pad eye in section 5.5.1. The pad eyes weldment require full penetrant so that the allowable stress on
weld is same as with base metal.

Rev Validity
Number Status
19 of 34
6 SKID BEAM AND SPREADER BAR CALCULATION (LIFTING)
6.1 Skid Beam Calculation

Material skid beam used S275JR with mechanical properties below,

275.0 410.0 – 560.0 21 27 at 20oC
Modulus elasticity of steel, E = 210,000 MPa
The skid frame that is considered as common strength calculation base on the longest span beam
with attached pad eyes have length 1,500 mm and distance between pad eyes 1,200 mm at skid tag
no. 101200XX002 in general arrangement drawing (Ref. Doc. No. 220810DMDAWC013).
42,713.0 N
2D Modelling for A-B Skid Beam Analysis
Section properties:
1. Beam size: D = 200 mm, B = 80 mm, t = 7.5 mm, T = 11 mm

2. Moment inertia, Ix = 19,500,000 mm4 and Iy = 1,770,000 mm4
3. Section area, A = 3,130 mm2

Rev Validity
Number Status
20 of 34
Beam Section
At point A, shear force FA = (22,168.0 * 584) / 1,200 = 12,946,112.0 / 1,200 = 10,788.0 N

At point B, shear force FB = 22,168.0 – 10,788.0 = 11,380.0 N
Maximum bending moment, Mmax = (22,168 * 616 * 584) / 1,200 = 6,645,671.0 Nmm
Tension stress by bending moment, Sm = Mmax * 100 / Ix
= 6,645,671.0 * 100 / 19,500,000
= 34.0 MPa
Shear stress by shear force, Ss = FB / A = 10788 / 3130 = 3.45 N/mm2= 3.45 Mpa

Minimum stress, σ2 = -17 MPa
Check weldment strength,
Skid beam connection (Bottom frame) require full penetrant weld so that the allowable stress on weld
is same as with base metal.
FA1=FH+FH2xy
MA1=(FH+FH2xy)*147
Applied Force at Skid Beam Connection

Rev Validity
Number Status
21 of 34
d=80mm
Weld lgth, l = 360 mm

thk w = 7.5 mm b=200mm
FA1 = 7,447.0 N MA1 = 1,094,709.0 Nmm
Tension stress due to bending moment MA1, Sm = MA1 * 100 / Ix
Where, Ix = moment inertia of weldment is same as beam 19,500,000 mm4

Sm = (1,094,709.0 * 100) / 19,500,000.0 = 5.6 MPa
Tension stress due to FA1, St = FA1 / A = 7,447.0 / 3,130 = 2,4 MPa
Total tension stress, Sts = Sm + St = 8.0 MPa

Maximum stress, σ1 = (8.0 + 0)/2 + sqrt (((8.0 - 0)/2)2 + (0)2)
Minimum stress, σ2 = (8.0 + 0)/2 - sqrt (((8.0 - 0)/2)2 + (0)2)

6.2 Spreader Bar Calculation

Material spreader bar used S275JR or equivalent with mechanical properties below,

275.0 410.0 – 560.0 21 27 at 20oC
Modulus elasticity of steel, E = 210,000 MPa
The spreader bar is considered as common spreader that can use for all skids. The detail of spreader
bar refers to general arrangement drawing (Ref. Doc. No. 220810DMDAWC013).
FSB1=22,158 N FSB2=20,555 N
2D Modelling for Spreader Bar Analysis

Rev Validity
Number Status
22 of 34
Section properties:
4. Beam size: D = 100 mm, B = 100 mm, t = 5 mm, T = 7 mm

5. Moment inertia, Ix = 3,440,000 mm4 and Iy = 1,170,000 mm4
6. Section area, A = 1,920 mm2
Beam Section
At point 1, shear force F1 = (22,158.0 * 1,128+20,555*116) / 1,244 = 27,378,604.0 / 1,244
= 22,009.0 N
At point 2, shear force F2 = 42,713.0 – 22,009.0 = 20,704.0 N
Maximum bending moment, Mmax = 22,158 * 116 = 2,570,328.0 Nmm

Tension stress by bending moment, Sm = Mmax * 50 / Ix
= 2,570,328.0 * 50 / 3,440,000
= 37.0 MPa
Shear stress by shear force, Ss = F1 / A = 22,009.0 / 1,920 = 11.5 MPa


Rev Validity
Number Status
23 of 34
7 TRANSPORTATION AND OPERATING CONDITION LOAD CALCULATION
Load calculation in this section for each skid will become basis of determining the size of
anchor bolt, foundation bolt and sea fastening during transportation to FPU and
operating, test and blast condition at FPU after installation. The load calculation refers to
Attachment 2.

Attachment 1 – Shackle and
Master Link Assembly Datasheet
[email protected]
Page 24 of 34
Welded Master Links with Engineered Flat
• Alloy Steel — Quenched and Tempered.

• Individually Proof Tested to values shown, with certification.
• Proof Tested with 60% inside width special fixtures sized to prevent
localized point loading per ASME A-952 , reference page 276.
• Forgings have a Product Identification Code (PIC) for material
traceability, along with the size, the name Crosby and USA in raised lettering.
• Selected sizes designated with “W” in the size column have enlarged
inside dimensions to allow additional room for sling hardware and crane
hook.
• Crosby 1 ¼” to 2” 344/347 master links are type approved to DNV
Certification Notes 2.7-1- Offshore Containers. These Crosby master
links are 100% proof tested, MPI and impact tested. The tests are
conducted by Crosby and 3.1 test certification is available upon request.
A-347
Refer to page 164 for Crosby COLD TUFF® master links that meet the
Welded Master
additional requirements of DNV rules for certification of lifting appliances -
Links
Loose Gear.
Ultimate Load is 5 times the Working Load
• Incorporates patented QUIC-CHECK® deformation indicators.
Accessories
Limit. Applications with wire rope and
Rigging
synthetic sling generally require a design
factor of 5. Based on single leg sling (in-line • Meets or exceeds all requirements of ASME B30.26 including
load), or resultant load on multiple legs with identification, ductility, design factor, proof load and temperature
an included angle less than or equal to 120
degrees. ** Proof Test Load equals or requirements. Importantly, these links meet other critical performance
exceeds the requirement of ASTM requirements including fatigue life, impact properties and material
A952(8.1) and ASME B30.9. For use with
chain slings, refer to page 240 for sling traceability, not addressed by ASME B30.26.
ratings and page 245 for proper master
link selection.
A-347 Welded Master Link Assembly with Engineered Flat

Dimensions
Size (in.)
A-347 Working Load Engineered Flat Size
Stock Weight Each Limit Proof Load for S-1325A
(in.) (mm) No (lbs.) (lbs.)* (lbs.)** A B C D E F G (in.)
1/2 13/12 1257692 1.80 5300 13200 .51 2.36 4.72 .47 3.35 1.77 .24 –
11/16 17/13 1257762 3.40 9000 22700 .67 3.54 6.30 .51 4.72 2.36 .26 1/4
3/4 19/13 1257832 4.00 9300 23400 .75 3.54 6.30 .51 4.72 2.36 .26 1/4
7/8 22/17 1257972 7.20 14700 36800 .87 3.94 7.10 .67 6.30 3.54 .33 5/16
1-1/8 28/22 1258142 15.4 31900 79800 1.10 5.71 10.83 .87 7.10 3.94 .41 3/8
1-7/32 31/25 1258182 20.8 37500 93700 1.22 5.71 10.83 .98 8.10 4.53 .53 1/2
1-9/16 40/31 1258332 40.5 61900 154900 1.57 6.30 11.80 1.22 10.63 5.50 – –
1-3/4 45/36 1258402 58.2 84400 211100 1.77 7.10 13.40 1.42 11.20 6.10 – –
2 51/45 1258462 95.0 99200 248000 2.00 7.50 13.80 1.80 13.40 7.10 – –
*Ultimate Load is 5 times the Working Load Limit. Applications with wire rope and synthetic sling generally require a design factor of 5. Based on single leg sling (in-line load), or resultant load on
multiple legs with an included angle less than or equal to 120 degrees.**Proof Test Load equals or exceeds the requirement of ASTM A952(8.1) and ASME B30.9.
For use with chain slings, refer to page 246 for sling ratings and page 240 for proper master link selection.
Copyright © 2017 The Crosby Group LLC All Rights Reserved 163
Page 25 of 34
Crosby® Bolt Type Shackles
• Capacities 2 to 17 metric tons.

• Meets or exceeds all requirements of Grade 8 shackles.
• Working Load Limit permanently shown on every shackle.
• Forged Alloy Steel – Quenched and Tempered, with bow and bolt.
• Hot Dip galvanized.
Shackles
• Shackles can be RFID EQUIPPED.
• Meets or exceeds all requirements of ASME B30.26 including identification,
ductility, design factor, proof load and temperature requirements.
Importantly, G-2130A meet other critical performance requirements
including impact properties and material traceability, not addressed by
G-2130A ASME B30.26.
Bolt Type Anchor shackles with thin
head bolt – nut with cotter pin. Meets • Shackles can be furnished proof tested with certificates to designated
the performance requirements of standards, such as ABS, DNV, Lloyds, or other certification when requested
Federal Specification RR-C-271F
Type IVA, Grade B, Class 3, except at time of order.
for those provisions required of the • Type Approval and certification in accordance with DNV 2.7-1 Offshore
contractor. For additional information,
see page 452. Containers.
• Shackles are Quenched and Tempered and meet DNV impact requirements
of 42 joules (31 ft.-Ibs.) at -40 degrees C (-40 degrees F).
®
SEE APPLICATION INFORMATION
On Page 92 of the General Catalog
Para Español: www.thecrosbygroup.com
G-2130A Alloy Bolt Bolt Type Shackles Grade 8

Working Dimensions Tolerance
Nominal Load Weight (in) +/-
Size Limit G-2130A Each
(in.) (t)* Stock No. (lbs.) A B C D E F H L M N C A
1/2 2 1219472 .79 .81 .63 1.88 0.50 1.31 1.19 3.29 2.30 2.80 0.50 0.13 0.06
5/8 3-1/4 1219491 1.37 1.06 .75 2.38 0.63 1.69 1.50 4.18 2.94 3.56 0.69 0.25 0.06
3/4 4-3/4 1219516 2.71 1.25 .88 2.82 0.75 2.01 1.81 4.96 3.51 4.15 0.81 0.25 0.06
7/8 6-1/2 1219534 3.95 1.44 1.00 3.31 0.88 2.29 2.09 5.83 4.02 4.82 0.97 0.25 0.06
1 8-1/2 1219552 5.03 1.69 1.10 3.76 1.00 2.70 2.38 6.58 4.69 5.39 1.06 0.25 0.06
1-1/8 9-1/2 1219578 8.27 1.81 1.25 4.26 1.13 2.92 2.70 7.49 5.16 5.90 1.25 0.25 0.06
1-1/4 12 1219598 11.7 2.03 1.38 4.69 1.25 3.25 2.99 8.27 5.75 6.69 1.38 0.25 0.06
1-3/8 13-1/2 1219614 15.8 2.25 1.50 5.24 1.38 3.62 3.31 9.18 6.38 7.21 1.50 0.25 0.13
1-1/2 17 1219632 19.0 2.38 1.63 5.75 1.50 3.88 3.62 10.0 6.90 7.73 1.62 0.25 0.13
* NOTE: Maximum Proof Load is 2.0 times the Working Load Limit. Minimum Ultimate Strength is 8 times the Working Load Limit. For Working Load Limit
reduction due to side loading applications, see page 94.
Testing the Limits

In 2013, Sir Ranulph Fiennes and five colleagues
set out to test the limits of human endurance and
achieve the feat of becoming the first individuals
to cross the continent of Antarctica in winter. As
a proud partner in this endeavor, Crosby provided
its full range of COLD TUFF® products, which
are specifically manufactured to function in
extreme environments such as those encountered
throughout the expedition—including temperatures
as low as -90° C.
Copyright © 2017 The Crosby Group LLC All Rights Reserved 81

Page 26 of 34
Attachment 2 – Transportation and
Operating Condition Load Calculation
[email protected]
Page 27 of 34
TRANSPORTATION AND OPERATING CONDITION LOAD CALCULATION
Eni East Sepinggan Ltd
PROJECT : MERAKES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

END USER : ENI EAST SEPINGGAN LTD REV : 03
JOB NO. : J18-2036-01
A. Environmental Criteria: Wind Speed 30 m/s
C.o.G (Skid)
Wind load, Fa
Anchor bolts Anchor bolts
B. Force and Acceleration Criteria: Ship movement
Heave load, Fh
Roll load, Fr Roll load, Fr
C.o.G (Skid)
Anchor bolts Anchor bolts
FPU dimension and Centre of Gravity (Refer to Doc. No. 220801DNCS37504)
Page 28 of 34

QUOTATION NO. : J18-2036-01
1. ANCHOR BOLT SELECTION AND PROPERTIES

Skid Description : Scale Inhibitor Skid (101200XX001)
General Specifications
a). Size : Hex. Bolt M20-13 UNC with Hole Dia. 22mm, quantity 4 units
b). Material : Bolt DIN 934, stainless steel 316
E= Elasticity Modulus
E= 193000 N/mm2
Fy = Proof Load Test
Fy = 800.0 N/mm2
c). Dead load (W) : Load Factor * Gross weight
: 1.15 * 684 = 786.6 kg
2. CHECK STRESS CAUSED WIND LOAD

Wind Speed, V 30 m/s (Assumed heavy storm)
Panel Area, A 1.54 m2
Air densy@30oC, R 1.164 kg/m3
Drag coeff. (Panel), Cd 1.05
Force (Fa) = 847.0 N Fa = Cd *(R/2)*A*V2
Shear (each bolt) = 1.7 N/mm2
3. CHECK STRESS CAUSED DEAD LOAD (COMBINED FORCE MOTION)
Longitudinal distance from centre of rotation, Xcg 0.0 m

Transverse distance from centre of rotation, Ycg 0.0 m
Vertical distance from centre of rotation, Zcg 14.0 m
o
Roll angle, Øroll 20
Time period, Troll 10 second
o
Pitch angle, Øpitch 12.5
Time period, Tpitch 10 second
Heave period, Theave 10 second
Heave acceleration, aheave 1.96 m/s2
Force Summary
1. Roll Forces (Static)
1.a Vertical Roll Force FZRS = W * Cos Øroll 739.2 kg
1.b Horizontal Roll Force FYRS = W * Sin Øroll 269.0 kg
2. Pitch Forces (Static)
2.a Vertical Roll Force FZPS = W * Cos Øpitch 768.0 kg
2.b Horizontal Roll Force FXPS = W * Sin Øpitch 170.3 kg
3. Roll Forces (Dynamic)

3.a Vertical Roll Force FZRD = W * 4 * π2 * Ycg * Øroll / (Troll2 * g) 0.0 kg
3.b Horizontal Roll Force FYRD = W * 4 * π2 * Zcg * Øroll / (Troll2 * g) 154.5 kg
4. Pitch Forces (Dynamic)
4.a Vertical Roll Force FZPD = W * 4 * π2 * Xcg * Øpitch / (Tpitch2 * g) 0.0 kg
4.b Horizontal Roll Force FXPD = W * 4 * π2 * Zcg * Øpitch / (Tpitch2 * g) 96.6 kg
5. Heave-Roll Forces
3.a Vertical Force FZHRD = W * aheave * (Cos Øroll / g) 157.2 kg
3.b Horizontal Force FYHRD = W * aheave * (Sin Øroll / g) 53.8 kg
6. Heave-Pitch Forces
3.a Vertical Force FZHPD = W * aheave * (Cos Øpitch / g) 153.4 kg
3.b Horizontal Force FXHPD = W * aheave * (Sin Øpitch / g) 34.0 kg
Page 29 of 34

4. SUMMARY OF FORCES
Maximum Motion Force in Longitudinal and Transverse Directions

Transverse, FTM (FYRS + FYRD + FYHRD) 477.3 kg The higher value
Longitudinal, FLM (FXPS + FXPD + FXHPD) 300.9 kg
Combined Vertical Forces

Roll to Stb Heave Down (FZRS + FZRD + FZHRD) 896.4 kg
Roll to Stb Heave Up (FZRS + FZRD - FZHRD) 582.0 kg
Transverse
Roll to Port Heave Down (FZRS - FZRD + FZHRD) 896.4 kg
Roll to Port Heave Up (FZRS - FZRD - FZHRD) 582.0 kg
Pitch to Fwd Heave Down (FZPS + FZPD + FZHPD) 921.4 kg The higher value
Pitch to Fwd Heave Up (FZPS + FZPD - FZHPD) 614.6 kg
Longitudinal
Pitch to Aft Heave Down (FZPS - FZPD + FZHPD) 921.4 kg
Pitch to Aft Heave Up (FZPS - FZPD - FZHPD) 614.6 kg
F = 2259.7335 N
A 314 mm2
τ FPU Motion = 7.20 N/mm2
τ Wind Speed = 1.70 N/mm2
τ Bolt total = Stress FPU Motion + Stress Wind Speed

= 8.90 N/mm2
Allowable stress 0.66 Fy

528 N/mm2
Base on above calculation, the actual stress far below than allowable stress
Base on above calculation, the bolt M20 with qty 4 pcs, properly to support the CIS
Page 30 of 34


Skid Description : Corrosion Inhibitor Skid (101200XX002)
E= 193000 N/mm2
Fy = 800.0 N/mm2
: 1.15 * 661 = 760.15 kg


o
o
Force Summary

Page 31 of 34



Transverse
Longitudinal
F = 2183.706 N
A 314 mm2

= 8.65 N/mm2

528 N/mm2
Page 32 of 34


Skid Description : Methanol Skid (101200XX006)
E= 193000 N/mm2
Fy = 800.0 N/mm2
: 1.15 * 1754 = 2017.1 kg


o
o
Force Summary

Page 33 of 34



Transverse
Longitudinal
F = 3864.6495 N
A 314 mm2

= 14.01 N/mm2

528 N/mm2
Page 34 of 34

Merakes Development Project: Floating Production Unit Upgrade EPCI-1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Merakes Development Project: Floating Production Unit Upgrade EPCI-1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Merakes Development Project: Floating Production Unit Upgrade EPCI-1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MERAKES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

FLOATING PRODUCTION UNIT UPGRADE

CHEMICAL INJECTION PACKAGE – STRUCTURAL CALCULATION NOTE

03 EX-DE 28/05/19 Final Issue FAJAR J.N ZEKI M. EFRIZAL

PO/ Contract N. 1256125

Document Title Supersedes N. n.a

STRUCTURAL CALCULATION NOTE (INCLUDING Superseded by N. n.a

Project / Initiative name FPU Jangkrik Production Increase Capacity

Prepared by Signature Date

Fajarjoko Nugroho 28/05/2020

Checked by Signature Date

Approved by Signature Date

Checked by Unit Signature Date

Checked by Unit Signature Date

Approved by Unit Signature Date

Endorsed by Unit Signature Date

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

00 Issued for Review

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

Figure 1 - East Sepinggan Block

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

Jangkrik is a deepwater project currently in execution, which started producing through

The submarine control of the field will be provided by a electro-hydraulic umbilical.

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

It is important to highlight that the FPU is owned by a different JV (Muara Bakau),

1.2 Scope and Purpose

a. Structural analysis is carried out by manual calculation in accordance to recognized

101200XX001 684.0 787.0 160.0 2.0

101200XX002 661.0 760.0 160.0 2.0

101200XX006 1,754.0 2,017.0 160.0 2.0

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

2.2 Vendor Documents

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

3 DEFINITION AND ABBREVIATIONS

FPU Floating Production Unit

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

4.1 General Approach

4.2 Structural Idealization

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

4.4 Co-ordinate System

4.5 Design Lift Force

Where, g = Standard acceleration of gravity in m/s2 (9.81)

The design lift force is calculated,

4.6 Acceptance Criteria

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

5 LIFTING SETS SELECTION AND PAD EYES CALCULATION

5.1 Boundary Condition and Load Application

5.2 Analysis Model and Support Location

2D Model for Skid Tag No. 101200XX001 (Scale Inhibitor)

2D Model for Skid Tag No. 101200XX002 (Corrosion Inhibitor)

This document is property of Eni East Sepinggan Ltd

RSL1, 2 RSL3, 4 Ø = 10o

2D Model for Skid Tag No. 101200XX006 (Methanol)

5.3 Load Cases and C.o.G Location

101200XX001 684.0 787.0 160.0 2.0

101200XX002 661.0 760.0 160.0 2.0

101200XX006 1,754.0 2,017.0 160.0 2.0

Sw = (d * b3/12) – ((d-2w) (b-2*w)3/12) = 14,938,749.0 mm4