L - Theories of Punishment

THEORIES OF PUNISHMENT
Dr. Ravulapati Madhavi,

Associate Professor of Law,
Dr. MCR HRDI
Conceptual caravan
Act-Wrong-Offence-Crime
• Law of man is an uncaned liberty and Law of
God is a caned liberty. An accepted measure
of action is good and so “prescribed”, and
unaccepted act is “proscribed”.
• A proscribed act, in generic sense, is known as
‘wrong’ and public reason directs caging of
such misdemeanor.
Then
• Sovereign law transforms the social
disapprobation into defined “offence”.
• Such legally proscribed act i.e. “Offence” is
subjected to “just and fair” judicial
investigation, duly evidenced and established
is reckoned as “Crime”.
• Crime, a proved offence, impels caustic
consequences – PUNISHMENT.
DEFINITIONAL DILEMMA
• Punishment is identified by – infliction of pain,
forfeiture, chastisement, castigation or
penalty.
• Punishment to prevent the perpetration of
acts classified as criminal, to coerce or deter
culprits to realize and reform, to undo
injustice.
Ancestral analysis
• Hindu Law giver ‘MANU’ summerized the
object of punishment as –
• “Punishment governs all mankind;
punishment alone preserves them;
punishment wakes while their guards are
asleep; the wise considers the punishment
(Danda) as the perfection of justice.”
So punishment is warranted
• To protect the society from mischievous and
undesirable elements;
• by deterring potential offenders,
• By preventing the actual offenders from
committing further offences
• Transforming the tainted convicts into law-
abiding citizens.
THEORETICAL APPRISAL
For safe,orderly, peaceful and prosperous society
to exist and flourish – the following tools of theory
are found to be good guides:
1. Deterrent Theory
2. Preventive Theory
3. Retributive Theory
4. Reformative Theory
5. Expiatory Theory
6. Multiple Approach theory.
DETERRENT THEORY
• “I do not punish you for stealing the ship, but so that
the ship may not be stolen” – the central cynosure of
the theory.
• Not only to prevent the wrongdoer from doing a
wrong, but also to make him an example for others,
calculated to curb criminal tendency in others.
• At times, severe punishments like death by stoning or
whipping, mutilation of limbs etc are awarded even to
minor offences.
• This theory lives even to day in many muslim countries.
PREVENTIVE THEORY
• Concentrates on the prisoner to prevent him
from repetitive endeavors – to ward off
recidivism.
• Offenders disabled by punishments like death,
exile or forfeiture of office and incarceration.
• Found to be having undesirable effect on first
offenders or juvenile offenders.
RETRIBUTIVE THEORY
• “Tooth for Tooth, Eye for Eye, Limb for Limb
and Nail for Nail” – principle of this theory.
• Earlier, legal sanctions grounded in vengeance
and retaliation - revenge is justice gone wild.
• found to be archaic, inhuman and barbaric –
modern human rights philosophy condemns
this cruel concept.
REFORMATIVE THEORY
• “Condemn the Sin, not the Sinner” – Mahatma
Gandhi.
• Reformation process is like a surgeon operating
on a person to remove the pain.
• It is a craft or skill in bringing back the tainted and
condemned culprits to national mainstream and
civil society, as meaningful citizens.
• Critics hold the prisons as dwelling homes – a
satire.
EXPIATORY THEORY
• “To pay for the sin committed”
• Repentance, compunction, atonement and
reparation - conscience oriented cleansing of
hearts.
• Offender to serve the victims and their
dependents to compensate the deprivation.
• Held impracticable being too idealistic.
• Experimentation of this theory is too expensive in
terms of public safety and security.
MULTIPLE APPROACH THEORY
• Application of any single theory may not render
complete justice –
• The aforesaid theories are not mutually exclusive.
• hence judicious combination of theories is the
latest approach.
• “If the potentials of prisoner-person are
unfolded, a robber may become a Valmiki, and a
sinner may become a saint.” – Krishna Iyer. J.
(Rakesh Kaushik vs. Supdt. Central Jail)
PUNISHMENTS - INDIAN PENAL CODE.
• Ss- 53 to 75 of I.P.C. (Ch.III) refer to graded system
of punishments.
• 1. Death.
• 2. Imprisonment for Life.
• 3. Imprisonment – Rigorous and Simple.
• 4. Forfeiture of property.
• 5. Fine.
• In addition to the above, Ss-73 & 74 refer to
solitary confinement.
NEW OUTLOOK
• To exert social, psychological, moral impact on
criminals, new judicial tools are suggested –
1.Externment or Banishment.(habitual and
hardened criminals – Bombay Police Act, 1951,
Kerala Police Act,1964, Delhi Police Act, 1964,
M.P.Security Act, 1959 etc.)
2. Compensatory Jurisprudence. (S-357 of CrPC)
(Rudal Shah, Bhimsingh, Veena Sethi, etc.
Contd…
3. PUBLIC CENSURE or Social Censure.
– Followed in Russia and Columbia in cases of white
collar crimes, Food Adulteration offences.
– Indian Law Commission – 42nd. Report also
recommended in certain class of offences.
4. COMMUNITY SERVICE OR CORRECTIVE LABOR.
(extension of Expiatory theory)
5. DISQUALIFICATION FROM HOLDING PUBLIC
OFFICE AND CONTEST ELECTIONS. (R.P.Act,1951)

L - Theories of Punishment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

L - Theories of Punishment

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

L - Theories of Punishment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THEORIES OF PUNISHMENT

Dr. Ravulapati Madhavi,

You might also like