Calibration Interval: How To Increase The Calibration Frequency of Instruments
Calibration Interval: How To Increase The Calibration Frequency of Instruments
Calibration Interval: How To Increase The Calibration Frequency of Instruments
ii. The organization shall determine if the validity of previous measurement results has been
adversely affected when measuring equipment is found to be unfit for its intended purpose, and
shall take appropriate action as necessary
If you read these requirements, there are no specific guides or standards that are required to
follow for calibration interval analysis or method, therefore, any methods that work for you are
ok. But it is better to have published documents or guides as a reference like the ILAC G24 which
is free to download.
“The so-called “engineering intuition” which fixed the initial calibration intervals, and a
system which maintains fixed intervals without review, are not considered as being
sufficiently reliable and are therefore not recommended. “
The decision on where to base the initial calibration interval depends solely on you as the
user. These could be based on below criteria:
1. Manufacturer Requirements – recommended by manufacturer
2. On the frequency of use – the more it is used, the shorter the calibration interval
3. Required by the regulatory bodies (example: required by the government)
4. Past experience of the user with the same type of instrument
6. Based on the criticality of use. – more critical instruments have higher accuracy or
very strict tolerance, therefore shorter calibration interval
7. Customer Requirements
8. Conditions of the environment where it is being used.
9. Published Documents
Initial calibration intervals in some cases could become the ‘fixed/final calibration interval’,
considering that we already have evidence to justify why we decide this calibration interval for a
specific instrument. I will share 1 method to be used for justification.. Just continue reading.
Remember that the above choices are the basis for an initial interval, our job is not finished here
yet. The next move is to determine or to establish the final or ‘fixed Interval of calibration’ using
a specific method or procedure. And this is where the method that I will present here will be used.
I will present here a modified method based on the principle of a control chart and a calendar-
time method as per ILAC G24 (OIML D 10:2007). I will call this method the ‘Floating Interval
Method’ because it can increase or decrease in a given condition.
To establish a fixed interval, below is the calibration interval analysis procedure:
1. Gather historical records of the instrument using its calibration report for the past 2 years or
more.
2. Choose at least 3 readings that are mostly used, for example, the min, middle, and max to
determine stability or drift.
3. Use excel to summarize the readings.
4. Using the specifications and the calibration results, create a chart with control limits (a control
chart)-see below the table using excel (there are many tutorials about control chart in Google that
you can follow).
5. Understand and analyze the trend.
> Based on the trend, you can decide whether to increase or decrease the calibration interval
based on the Implementation Rule that you created for the Floating Interval Method. (See below
presentation)
a. Implementation Rule #1: 100% Increased on the next calibration interval after the 2 years if
results are within 80% – Max 24 months interval
b. Implementation Rule #2: 50% reduced on the next calibration interval every time As-Found
results are within warning interval or OUT-OF-TOLERANCE (and adding back the 50% after
passing on the next recalibration) –see the flow below second scenario.
6. Determine the final interval.
CHART INTERPRETATION
B. For steps 4 to 7, see the below presentation. These will show on “HOW TO INCREASE OR
DECREASE A CALIBRATION INTERVAL’
This is the chart from the table above. It shows the stability trend of the Test Gauge with the
Implementation rule for Increasing a calibration Interval It shows the analysis in the FIRST
SCENARIO flow sequence table.
As a basis for increasing the calibration interval, if you observed that the readings are within the
control limits you specified, it means that the instrument is stable. Based on your history, the Test
Gauge is stable for 2 years, as per implementation rule, we can extend it for 1 year up to a
maximum of 24 months (this is as per my implementation rule, you can adjust it but don’t
overdo it.)
On the opposite side, if readings failed as per the As-found Data, then you need to decrease it. As
per my decision, I will decrease it by 50%. This is I believe the most suitable range. See below
presentation.
Thi
s is a Decreasing Calibration Interval Implementation as per the Implementation Rule. The
analysis of the chart is presented in the SECOND SCENARIO flow sequence table.
Please take note that this is not a one size fits all method. You can change or adjust based on your
own needs and implementation rule.
I also want to emphasize that I did not include the Measurement Uncertainty as part of
the Decision Rule to make the presentation much simpler.
This will tell us the importance of recording the history of the performance of our instruments for
this purpose. Past records are used to justify why we extend or reduce calibration intervals.