Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide (H S) From Wastewater Using Chemical Oxidation and Red Mud-A Comparative Study
Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide (H S) From Wastewater Using Chemical Oxidation and Red Mud-A Comparative Study
Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide (H S) From Wastewater Using Chemical Oxidation and Red Mud-A Comparative Study
Methodology:
The method applicable to remove Hydrogen sulphide from wastewater is chemical oxidation.
The chemical oxidants preferred are:
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE:
Generally, 6% of the peroxide is reacted within 15 to 150 minutes, with the reaction
completed in 180 TO 210 minutes. Peroxide also reacts with other components of wastewater
that exhibit an oxygen demand such as BOD and ammonia nitrogen. For this purpose an
additional amount of H2O2 must be added to the required amount needed for H2S so that the
demand of the other oxygen-requiring substances may be satisfied.
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE:
Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) may be considered a liquid form of chlorine, kept in
solution by the incorporation of caustic Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH). Throughout this study a
12% concentration of NaOCl was utilized. It is used to oxidize H2S and organic leaving a
byproduct of Hydrogen Sulfate (H2SO4) and Sodium Chloride (NaCl).
POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE:
5% KMnO4 was employed to oxidize H2S as well as other organic odors in a wastewater
sample. It is available in crystalline form and can be added to the system in its dry form or in a
concentrated solution prepared onsite. There is a fast reaction between H2S and KMnO4.
RED MUD:
Red mud is used as adsorbent. Red mud of about 1 gm, 2 gm, 3gm and so on, was used to
check the absorbance of H2S and the dose was increased and experiment was repeated
0.5
0.45
0.4
Absorbanace at 470nm
0.35
0.3
0.25
y = 0.311x - 0.011
0.2
R² = 0.993
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Concentration of H2s in PPM
Fig 1: Calibration graph for the determination of Hydrogen sulphide under optimized experimental
condition.
RESULTS:
EXPERIMENTAL
1. Hydrogen peroxide is found to be more efficient than other 2 chemicals to remove H2S.
The removal efficiency is 100% for contact period of 120 min. As the dosage was
increased the time of removal was decreased.
2. Sodium Hypochlorite has removal efficiency of 91% for contact time period of 150 min.
To improve the efficiency some other parameters like pH and temperature should be
considered.
3. Potassium permanganate has removal efficiency of 81.6% with contact time period of
165 min and is less efficient than the above chemicals.
4. Red mud acts as a good adsorbent with the removal efficiency of 100%. As the dose of
red mud was increased, the surface area and adsorbing capacity increased, as it contains
40% of NaOH.
Response surface methodology
It is a Statistical method for optimization of process. The above experiments were
optimized by using Central composite Design (CCD) and Response Surface
Methodology(RSM). The experiments were statistically verified and the model equation is
developed which is used to predict percentage removal of H2S by using chemical oxidation and
red mud.
Expected outcome of the project:
We have successfully completed chemical oxidation method for the removal of H2S (100%). We
found that the chemical methods are relatively costlier since the costs of chemicals involved in
the process are relatively high.
Our basic objective was to show removal of H2S with economic feasibility, therefore, red
mud is a waste produced from alumina industry, it is better option than chemical oxidation
method. We try to develop economical process to remove H2S by using red mud. Optimization
process will be shown in detail for developing further process. Removal of H2S can be
successful by treatment using chemical oxidation, and Red mud. The comparison of the
efficiencies of oxidants and reducing the concentrations of H2S from water.