Right of Transit Passage
Right of Transit Passage
Right of Transit Passage
The right of transit passage is defined as the exercise of the freedoms of navigation and overflight,
solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit through an international strait between
one part of the high seas or an EEZ and another part of the high seas or an EEZ, in the normal modes
of operation utilized by ships and aircraft for such passage. An exception to the right of transit
passage declares that the right “shall not apply if the strait is formed by an island of a State bordering
the strait and its mainland” and “there exists seaward of the island a route through the high seas or
through an exclusive economic zone of similar convenience with respect to navigational and
hydrographical characteristics.” Transit passage cannot be hampered or suspended by the coastal
22
State for any purpose during peacetime. This also applies to transiting ships, including warships, of
States at peace with the bordering coastal State but involved in armed conflict with another
State. The right of transit passage applicable in peacetime, along with the laws and regulations of
23
States bordering straits adopted in accordance with international law, continue to apply during armed
conflict. However, during transit belligerents must not conduct offensive operations against enemy
forces, nor use such neutral waters as a place of sanctuary or as a base of operations. 24
It is important to note a few key differences between innocent passage and transit passage that are
particularly relevant to military operations and to highlight the fact that fewer restrictions may be
imposed on transit passage when compared to innocent passage. While there is no right to innocent
passage for aircraft, and coastal States may deny entry to aircraft attempting to traverse airspace over
their territorial waters, they may not deny transit passage to aircraft over an international strait.
In addition, while coastal States may require submarines to conduct innocent passage on the surface
and showing their flag, they may not prohibit submarines from conducting transit passage
submerged. Another difference is that transit passage may not be suspended by the coastal State,
25
navigational practices and the security of the force, including the use of their electronic detection and
navigational devices such as radar, sonar, and depth sounding devices, formation steaming, and the
launching and recovery of aircraft. 28
bordering straits have the authority to establish sea lanes and traffic separation schemes where
necessary to promote the safe passage of ships in straits used for international navigation. Warships,
30
auxiliaries, and government ships operated on exclusive government service, i.e., sovereign-immune
vessels, are not legally required to comply with such sea lanes and traffic separation schemes while
in transit passage, but they must exercise due regard for the safety of navigation. Coastal States may
not prohibit transit or otherwise impair the right of transit passage of nuclear-powered sovereign
vessels. 31
Coastal States have the authority to adopt laws and regulations relating to transit passage through
straits, with respect to all or any of the following:
(a) The safety of navigation and the regulation of maritime traffic, as provided in Article 41;
(b) The prevention, reduction and control of pollution, by giving effect to applicable international
regulations regarding the discharge of oil, oily wastes and other noxious substances in the strait;
(c) With respect to fishing vessels, the prevention of fishing, including the stowage of fishing gear;
(d) The loading or unloading of any commodity, currency or person in contravention of the customs,
fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations of States bordering straits.
32
States bordering straits have the duty not to hamper transit passage and to give appropriate publicity
to any danger to navigation or overflight within or over the strait of which they have knowledge. 33